| [02:35] <andersk> This Mercurial import failed with a strange error; anyone know why? https://code.launchpad.net/~edwardzyang/urweb/default | |
| [02:35] <andersk> “RuntimeError: if we move self._source_infos, then we need to change all of the index pointers as well.” | |
| [06:51] <crass> I keep getting a "Could not be uploaded correctly" failure, for a recipe build. Here's the log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/111260367/buildlog.txt.gz | |
| [06:52] <crass> I don't see any errors, just some warnings building the source package, but I don't think they are causing the failure | |
| [06:53] <crass> unless source packages need the newer 3.0 format... but I don't think they do | |
| [06:54] <wgrant> crass: If you click on the build link you'll see a separate link to the upload loag | |
| [06:54] <wgrant> log | |
| [06:55] <wgrant> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/111260396/upload_3989462_log.txt | |
| [06:55] <wgrant> INFO Processing upload wader_0.5.12+svn20120727+r842-0~r843~crass~quantal1_source.changes | |
| [06:55] <wgrant> INFO Upload was rejected: | |
| [06:55] <wgrant> INFO wader_0.5.12+svn20120727+r842-0~r843~crass~quantal1.dsc: Unknown section '-' | |
| [06:55] <wgrant> INFO wader_0.5.12+svn20120727+r842-0~r843~crass~quantal1.tar.gz: Unknown section '-' | |
| [06:55] <wgrant> INFO Further error processing not possible because of a critical previous error. | |
| [06:56] <wgrant> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~crass/wader/rename-debian/view/head:/debian/control | |
| [06:56] <wgrant> There's no Section field in the source stanza | |
| [06:56] <crass> thanks wgrant, hadn't noticed that. So is that referring to the '-' in the version part of the file name? | |
| [06:57] <crass> oh, ok, got it | |
| [06:57] <wgrant> It's referring to the Files section of the changes file that debuild produces from debian/control and that you'd normally upload | |
| [06:57] <wgrant> In this case it's generated automatically, but if you build the package locally you should see the issue in the .changes file | |
| [06:58] <wgrant> To fix, just add the Section field to the Source stanza | |
| [07:01] <crass> it would be nice to have the upload log linked incase of an upload error, as oppose to the buildlog (or even better have it in one log) | |
| [07:02] <wgrant> They have to be separate logs, but indeed it should be linked. | |
| [07:02] <crass> they have to be because they are on separate machines? | |
| [07:02] <wgrant> Pretty much. | |
| [07:03] <wgrant> (upload failures like this are pretty rare, so it wasn't a priority to shown the log prominently) | |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: czajkowski| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | |
| [12:28] <jonathanj> hrm, is something up with launchpad at the moment? trying to do a bzr merge i get "Unexpected end of message. Please check connectivity and permissions, and report a bug if problems persist." | |
| [12:28] <jonathanj> and push (from another machine) seems to either be taking a really long time or is doing nothing (i'm not sure how to tell which of those it is) | |
| [12:30] <jelmer> jonathanj: we're looking into it | |
| === Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark | |
| === nigelbabu is now known as nigelb | |
| === ev_ is now known as ev | |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: czajkowski| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad Help contact:-| Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | |
| === zyga is now known as zyga-afk | |
| [17:09] <abentley> sinzui: AIUI, there are 5 information types. Why not six? (i.e. adding "Public proprietary") Or four? (i.e. removing "Public Security") | |
| [17:53] <sinzui> abentley: Each information type represents who owns the data and how we expect to to change or not change. | |
| [17:53] <sinzui> abentley: we expect private security to become public security | |
| [17:53] <sinzui> proprietary will never be public | |
| [17:54] <sinzui> private could be public if the personal information is scrub from the bug or branch | |
| [17:54] <sinzui> abentley: and we might need 6 or 7 if PES believe there are several kinds of proprietary | |
| [17:55] <sinzui> I am have anxiety attacking over the very matter | |
| [17:55] <abentley> sinzui: Well, there are cases like Staroffice -> Openoffice and the open-sourcing of Netscape. | |
| [17:56] <abentley> sinzui: they may not be common enough to worry about, though. | |
| [17:56] <sinzui> abentley: product strategy did that to all webapp projects 7 days ago | |
| [17:59] <sinzui> abentley: They had to decide if they could reveal the entire commit history of the repository and decide if the bugs could be seen by other people | |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | |