|
=== Guest61848 is now known as samurai2 |
|
=== Guest11851 is now known as samurai2 |
|
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel |
|
[15:52] <roasted> hello! |
|
[15:52] <roasted> anybody active? |
|
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC |
|
[18:29] <ecanals> I'm having a driver related issue and want to know where I should post my question |
|
[18:29] <ecanals> I'm using Edubuntu 12.04 |
|
[18:37] <highvoltage> ecanals: http://askubuntu.com/ is usually very responsive |
|
[18:37] <ecanals> thanks |
|
[18:37] <highvoltage> ecanals: you could ask here too and if someone happens to know, they could help, but IRC is usually a mixed bag and people come and go |
|
[18:37] <ecanals> I'll try that now |
|
[18:41] <ecanals> yea, I know how it is |
|
[18:41] <ecanals> I've been searching for this for 2 days now to no avail |
|
[18:44] <brunolambert> "this" being? |
|
[18:46] <ecanals> I need to find the drivers for an Intel Atom Integrated Graphics processor |
|
[18:47] <ecanals> the card is compatible with |
|
[18:47] <ecanals> Atom D2500 |
|
[18:47] <ecanals> D2700 |
|
[18:47] <ecanals> N2100 |
|
[18:47] <ecanals> N2600 |
|
[18:47] <ecanals> and N2800 |
|
[18:48] <ecanals> or Intel UMA integrated graphics controller |
|
[19:22] <ecanals> well now my graphics card shows as Vesa Intel XX |
|
[19:22] <ecanals> but I can't adjust the screen resolution |
|
[19:23] <ecanals> its stuck at 800x300 |
|
[19:23] <ecanals> 4:3 |
|
[20:10] <highvoltage> ecanals: ah, that's interesting |
|
[20:15] <highvoltage> ecanals: so is this some new integrated gpu that's different to the old atom ones? |
|
[20:35] <stgraber> ecanals: can you paste the output of "lspci -nnn | grep VGA" please? |
|
[20:36] <stgraber> I'm wondering if you don't happen to have a cedarview intel graphic card |
|
[20:36] <stgraber> if you do, then you'll have to wait a few more weeks as the enablement for these in 12.04 is still ongoing and scheduled to land within the next month |
|
[20:43] <ecanals> ok |
|
[20:43] <ecanals> will do |
|
[20:43] <ecanals> I'm not on the machine at the moment |
|
[20:46] <ecanals> out of curiosity |
|
[20:46] <ecanals> what would be considered the optimal desktop UI for edubuntu |
|
[20:47] <ecanals> unity, gnome, or KDE |
|
[20:47] <ecanals> ? |
|
[20:48] <highvoltage> ecanals: unity and gnome-fallback is currently supported. gnome-shell and kde works fine but the edubuntu developers don't explicitely support them |
|
[20:48] <ecanals> I see |
|
[20:49] <highvoltage> ecanals: basically, all of those are fine. we're mostly targeting unity for future features that we want to introduce since it's the default in both ubuntu and edubuntu |
|
[20:49] <ecanals> just wondering, as there are several packages for the edubuntu bundle that are specifically for KDE |
|
[20:49] <highvoltage> ecanals: yep, they rely on KDE libraries, but don't require a KDE desktop |
|
[20:50] <ecanals> ok then |
|
[20:50] <ecanals> good to know |
|
[20:51] <ecanals> I'm curious about something else... |
|
[20:51] <ecanals> I've seen other versions of ubuntu that have been re-branded, so to speak |
|
[20:52] <ecanals> Kimo is one of them I believe |
|
[20:52] <ecanals> sorry |
|
[20:52] <ecanals> Qimo |
|
[20:53] <highvoltage> ecanals: you could probably look at the edubuntu-artwork package as an example of rebranding |
|
[20:53] <ecanals> is this in violation of any of Ubuntu terms of use |
|
[20:53] <ecanals> i see |
|
[20:54] <highvoltage> ecanals: nope, you may change all the branding |
|
[20:55] <ecanals> so it would ok to rebrand the boot screen, lock, screen, etc. with company branding |
|
[20:55] <highvoltage> yep |
|
[20:55] <ecanals> lock screen* |
|
[20:56] <ecanals> ok |
|
[20:59] <ecanals> I'm still working on this graphics card issue |
|
[21:00] <ecanals> I shotgunned the synaptic, which wasnt a good idea, and had to reformat |
|
[21:00] <ecanals> finishing up now |
|
[22:05] <ecanals_> sorry for the delay |
|
[22:05] <ecanals_> output for lspci -nnn | grep VGA |
|
[22:06] <ecanals_> Intel Corporation Atom Processor D2xxx/N2xxx Integrated Graphics Controller |
|
[22:06] <ecanals_> [8086:0be1](rec09) |
|
[22:06] <ecanals_> (rev09)* |
|
[23:10] <ecanals_> stgraber: it is a cedarview chipset |
|
[23:11] <ecanals_> I'm trying to work through it right now with the sarvat/cedarview ppa |
|
[23:29] <ecanals_> well, it works |
|
[23:30] <ecanals_> had to tweak a few ofthe steps in this guide http://daily.siebler.eu/2012/06/ubuntu-12-04-driver-for-intel-cedarview-atom-n2000-und-d2000-serie/ |
|
[23:30] <ecanals_> and this one:http://askubuntu.com/questions/163448/fixing-800x600-resolution-in-toshiba-nb510-gma-3650-with-vesa-driver |
|
[23:30] <ecanals_> but it seems to be working for now |
|
|