| [00:23] <infinity> cvanvliet_: Using them from where? | |
| === unknown|2 is now known as yangster | |
| === gildean_ is now known as gildean | |
| === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti | |
| === cvanvliet_ is now known as cvanvliet | |
| [06:38] <cvanvliet> infinity, http://elinux.org/BeagleBoardUbuntu#SGX_armel.2Farmhf_v3.4.x.2B | |
| [06:39] <LetoThe2nd> hm. tried the omap4 netboot installer, but board does not boot afterwards. 12.10's boot.img-serial.gz should be right? | |
| [06:40] <LetoThe2nd> or rather boot.img-fat-serial? | |
| [06:44] <infinity> LetoThe2nd: boot.img-serial.gz should be fine if you zcat it to a card. If the installer ran all the way through, the image was fine. | |
| [06:44] <infinity> LetoThe2nd: But it's entire possible that it doesn't produce a bootable system in quantal. | |
| [06:44] <infinity> ogra_: Is flash-kernel-installer not doing nice things in quantal? I've heard a few reports of netboot not producing bootable systems. | |
| [06:45] <LetoThe2nd> infinity: it ran all the way. ah, i see. will give it one more try with 12.04 for now | |
| [06:45] <infinity> LetoThe2nd: 12.04 should be just fine. We use it all the time. | |
| [06:45] <LetoThe2nd> infinity: yeah, i just hoped i could already give 12.10 some testing | |
| [06:47] <LetoThe2nd> ah, and one more thing - do the arm port repos also provide rt-enabled kernels like for x86, or is there opportunity for playing? | |
| [07:04] <cvanvliet> infinity, I have asked in #beagle as well, I will let you know if I get any follow up, (afk) | |
| [07:55] <LetoThe2nd> hm, netinstall with precise also did not result in a bootable sd card. :( | |
| [08:59] <LetoThe2nd> ok, now i am pretty convinced that there is something fishy with the netboot installer taken from http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/precise/main/installer-armhf/current/images/omap4/netboot/boot.img-serial.gz | |
| [09:00] <LetoThe2nd> tried now twice with different sd cards, two times system is not booting anymore after successfully completing the installer. | |
| [09:00] <ogra_> file a bug, attach as many logs as you cnan find :) | |
| [09:00] <LetoThe2nd> image was written to block device using zcat image > device... everything correct so farß | |
| [09:01] <ogra_> right, but that image is a single partition image, flash-kernel doesnt know how to write to a device instead of to a partition | |
| [09:01] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: hence? | |
| [09:01] <ogra_> well, at least for omap4 it expects to have mmcblk0p1 | |
| [09:02] <ogra_> you could check if it still boots when you partition your SD first and then dd to the first partition | |
| [09:02] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: can do that. | |
| [09:03] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: something like creating a 60M fat16 partition on the blockdevice and then zcatting to that? | |
| [09:03] <ogra_> right | |
| [09:04] <LetoThe2nd> will do. report back in some minutes | |
| [09:04] <ogra_> thx | |
| [09:05] <LetoThe2nd> using the automagic partitioning afterwards is ok? | |
| [09:05] <ogra_> yes | |
| [09:06] <ogra_> it shouldnt care about the SD | |
| [09:06] <ogra_> only flash-kernel will in the end | |
| [09:06] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: does not even boot. | |
| [09:07] <ogra_> ah, sad | |
| [09:07] <LetoThe2nd> indeed. | |
| [09:07] <ogra_> i'll look into it | |
| [09:07] <LetoThe2nd> thx | |
| [09:07] <ogra_> thanks for telling me | |
| [09:08] <LetoThe2nd> np. | |
| [09:08] <LetoThe2nd> shall i walk though the process once more using the block directly for zcatting, so i can inspect the card afterwards? | |
| [09:08] <ogra_> that would be helpful, yes | |
| [09:09] <LetoThe2nd> np, will be ready after lunch i guess. | |
| === zyga is now known as zyga-afk | |
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | |
| [11:05] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: back with the sd card :) | |
| [11:05] <ogra_> so what does it show ? | |
| [11:06] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: after the finished install process, the favorite symptoms of any pandaboard user: power on -> status led 2 solid on. | |
| [11:06] <ogra_> hwo does the SD look like ? | |
| [11:06] <ogra_> *how even | |
| [11:07] <LetoThe2nd> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1098130/ | |
| [11:08] <LetoThe2nd> besides that, black and on the front side is printed "micro sd card 4gb class 10", on the back side it has some copper coloured contacts. | |
| [11:08] <LetoThe2nd> *SCNR* | |
| [11:09] <ogra_> oh, wait, you installed *to* the SD ? | |
| [11:10] <ogra_> janimo, ac100 images work fine now, thanks for all the help (the tegra driver in the archive makes lightdm end up in a restart loop though, i just uploaded the new tegra driver, lets see if that works) | |
| [11:10] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: roger that | |
| [11:11] <ogra_> hmm | |
| [11:11] <ogra_> i assume /dev/sdd1 contains /boot ? | |
| [11:12] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: i guess so, its what installer automagic created. | |
| [11:12] <ogra_> right | |
| [11:13] <ogra_> LetoThe2nd, bug 872525 | |
| [11:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 872525 in partman-uboot "No option for u-boot partition on armel omap/omap4 platforms" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/872525 | |
| [11:14] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: want me to try gruemasters suggestion? | |
| [11:14] <ogra_> that would be helpful | |
| [11:14] <ogra_> if that works i'll take a look at how we can default to that setting with a default preseed entry | |
| [11:15] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: will take some time, probably about an hour. gonna report back then. | |
| [11:15] <ogra_> great, thanks | |
| [11:15] * ogra_ will meanwhile take a look at the preinstalled server images | |
| [11:17] <TheMuso> ogra_: What was the reason for changing the panda images from preinstalled to live? | |
| [11:18] <ogra_> TheMuso, bad user experience due to bad I/O on SD cards | |
| [11:18] <ogra_> TheMuso, and the fact that it takes some effort to maintain the preinstalled stuff separately ... with the switch to live we just use what all other arches use | |
| [11:19] * TheMuso nods. | |
| [11:19] <ogra_> which reminds me ... | |
| [11:20] * ogra_ needs to update the alsa UCM stuff for the pandaboard, seems they renamed the device *AGAIN* ! | |
| [11:20] <TheMuso> UCM stuff is still very much in development it seems. | |
| [11:20] <ogra_> i hope they run out of names at some point | |
| [11:21] <ogra_> well, it worked (kind of) in precise and oneiric on the panda and the ac100 | |
| [11:21] <TheMuso> Well I'll be able to help with testing at least... Jason got panda boards for all desktopt team members, so as soon as I get a USB drive box, my panda will be running quantal. | |
| [11:21] <ogra_> yippie ! | |
| [11:22] <TheMuso> I probably still need to get extra bits, as I'd like to try and test 5.1 HDMI audio if possible. Got a stereo HDMI monitor, but I'd rather make sure everything works. | |
| [11:22] <TheMuso> ogra_: And are the gstreamer bits for omap4 available in precise? I see there is a driver via jockey, but what about the rest? | |
| [11:23] <ogra_> no, TI didnt make them available for the kernel we have in precise | |
| [11:23] <TheMuso> Shame. | |
| [11:23] <ogra_> there is a TI PPA that has them and an unsupported TI kernel package | |
| [11:23] <TheMuso> Ah ok. | |
| [11:34] <janimo> ogra_, \o/ for the final tegra graphics drivers! | |
| [11:34] <ogra_> well, lets see if they work :) | |
| [11:35] <ogra_> they already built, waiting for the publisher | |
| [11:35] <janimo> let's see how the new nvidia rebased kernel works, there may be regressions compared to precise | |
| [11:35] <ogra_> there surely is an issue with the alsa parts | |
| [11:35] <ogra_> i see a lot related messages | |
| [11:35] <janimo> marvin24, I went ahead and rebased our packaging tree (so your patches included in last package) on nvidia's l4t-15 branch | |
| [11:36] <janimo> I'll do a new rebase or cherry-picking for the changes you have added since sometimes soon | |
| [11:37] <janimo> I do not use the ac100 enough to know what kernel things still need fixing, so am a bit surprised to see new commits still being added as if there were actual issues :) | |
| [11:37] <ogra_> "tegra-alc5632.0: only stereo is supported in I2S mode" is what i get over and over in dmesg | |
| [11:37] <ogra_> (until i run sudo alsa force-unload to quieten it) | |
| [12:04] <LetoThe2nd> ogra_: nope, does not help | |
| [12:04] <ogra_> ok | |
| [12:05] <ogra_> probably partman-uboot is completely missing or so | |
| [12:05] <ogra_> i'll inspect it, as i said ... | |
| [12:05] <LetoThe2nd> the choice item was labeled a bit different "use longest contiguous free space" or so, it didn't fix it. | |
| [12:05] <TheMuso> ogra_: I should have my USB box tomorrow, so plan to do a net install then, if I get the same problem I'll do some digging as well, that is if you don't get to it today. | |
| [12:05] <ogra_> janimo, oh, disregard the moaning about alsa, i didnt run the new kernel yet, it was not on todays image | |
| [12:06] <ogra_> TheMuso, great, thanks | |
| [12:06] <janimo> oh, so it may actually be much worse :) | |
| [12:06] <ogra_> lets see ... rebooting | |
| [12:06] <janimo> I just ran a simple zImage to see it boot till tarbgall installer | |
| [12:06] <TheMuso> ogra_: TO confirm, in d-i, do I mark the first partition on the SD card as bootable? | |
| [12:07] <ogra_> janimo, hmm, looks like it hangs in fsck | |
| [12:07] <ogra_> TheMuso, doesnt matter we dont run DOS ;) | |
| [12:07] <ogra_> janimo, yeah, definitely | |
| [12:07] <TheMuso> ogra_: So I just ignore the SD card at partitioning time? | |
| [12:08] <ogra_> janimo, now it prints a message: "rcu_sched_state detected stall on CPU 1 (t=6000 jiffies)" | |
| [12:10] <ogra_> janimo, hmm second try works (still the same issue with lightdm constantly respawning though) | |
| [12:11] <janimo> ogra_, is this after a successful install with the previous kernel and ext2? | |
| [12:11] <ogra_> and the alsa messages are back as well | |
| [12:11] <ogra_> janimo, right, todays image | |
| [12:11] <janimo> can lightdm respawning be related to l4t or is this with fbdev? | |
| [12:11] <ogra_> then i installed the tegra driver, updated it ... and then pulled linux-ac100 | |
| [12:11] <ogra_> well it started with l4t | |
| [12:12] <ogra_> (before i upgraded the kernel) | |
| [12:12] <ogra_> but it can indeed be a missing bit in our kernels | |
| [12:12] <ogra_> which the final driver uses | |
| [12:13] <ogra_> hmm, intresting, startx works | |
| [12:13] <ogra_> and opening a terminal crashes it ... then it spills about 2000 alsa errors on the consile | |
| [12:15] <ogra_> *console | |
| [12:16] * ogra_ purges the nvidia driver | |
| [12:19] <ogra_> janimo, ok, without the driver i get lightdm to work, but still have the alsa errors (sound works though, its just extremely niosy in dmesg) | |
| [12:20] <janimo> ogra_, so it worked with the newest tegra driver and the previous kernel? | |
| [12:20] <ogra_> yes | |
| [12:20] <ogra_> err, no | |
| [12:20] <ogra_> sorry | |
| [12:21] <ogra_> Xorg.0.log only has a segfault, no further errors | |
| [12:32] <ogra_> janimo, for whatever reason my syslog is full of "fuse.ko: Invalig Argument" | |
| [12:32] <ogra_> *invalid | |
| [12:50] <ogra_> oh, i just noticed the new driver ships new udev rules and an upstart init script | |
| [12:50] <ogra_> SHRIEK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111 | |
| [12:51] <ogra_> first command in that initscript is: chmod 0666 /sys/power/state | |
| [12:52] <ogra_> oh, intresting ... all hardcoded sysfs paths in there have tegra3 in their pathname | |
| [12:54] <ogra_> seems even though it is a ventana package it expects tegra3 devices | |
| [13:03] <ogra_> janimo, hmm something is definitely weird with the fuse module | |
| [13:04] <ogra_> it complains that fuse is loaded already if gvfs tries to load it on desktop startup ... but lsmod disagrees | |
| [13:10] <janimo> ogra_, I'll do an install myself today or tomorrow and look at the issues that piled up. | |
| [13:10] <ogra_> k | |
| [13:10] <janimo> I need to start using the ac100 myself it has been just standing there doing nothing for a good while | |
| [13:11] <ogra_> i'll try to find out why the tegra driver fails ... | |
| [13:11] <ogra_> yeah, i moved to a shiny new desktop myself | |
| [13:11] <janimo> ogra_, so you're back on x86 again :) | |
| [13:12] <ogra_> didnt touch the ac100's for a while, quad core, 16G and a super fast SSD somewhat spoiled me :) | |
| [13:12] <janimo> mumble, mumble, kernel cross-compilation, mumble mumble | |
| [13:12] * ogra_ even started plaing games again in the evenings | |
| [13:12] <ogra_> ya ya ... i'll set up a cross env some day | |
| [13:13] <janimo> I keep saying that for almost 2 years but I should probably get myself one of those fast systems too. I do too much building and that would help | |
| [13:13] <ogra_> atm i try to fiull my 3TB HDD with images and a debmirror ... iÄ'll surely add several kvm's and cross chroots | |
| [13:13] <janimo> ogra_, it is not much of a cross env, no need for qemu and other junk for kernel. Just cross-gcc and you're done, so a single apt-get install :) | |
| [13:14] <ogra_> well, i want to keem the host system completely clean and do all work in chroots | |
| [13:14] <ogra_> *keep | |
| [13:14] <janimo> for full package builds yes, chroots and whatnot is needed, but kernel builds are really simple | |
| [13:14] <ogra_> preferably having them tarred up and unpacking them on the fly to a tmpfs | |
| [13:14] <janimo> having fast ssd and lots of RAM allows such complicated setups I guess | |
| [13:14] <ogra_> somehow i cant get the system to use more than 9-10G of the ram ... | |
| [13:15] <ogra_> so i can eat the rest with tmpfses | |
| [13:15] <janimo> isn't there something like SETI at home but which eats RAM instead of CPU cycles? You should try that | |
| [13:15] <marvin24> <ogra_> "tegra-alc5632.0: only stereo is supported in I2S mode" is what i get over and over in dmesg | |
| [13:15] <ogra_> that should allow cross builds in minutes :) | |
| [13:15] <marvin24> or pull ;-) | |
| [13:16] <ogra_> marvin24, pull ? | |
| [13:16] <janimo> git pull? | |
| [13:16] <ogra_> oh, a fix ! | |
| [13:16] <ogra_> great | |
| [13:16] <ogra_> i just blacklises all sound stuff for now ... | |
| [13:16] <ogra_> *blacklisted | |
| [13:17] <ogra_> concentrating on the xorg issue | |
| [13:17] <ogra_> i wonder if that driver is supposed to work with this kernel at all | |
| [13:17] <ogra_> startx actually gets me a full desktop but X crashes as soon as i click something | |
| [13:18] <janimo> marvin24, I tried cloning your tree again yesterday but gitorious would not let me. I'll try again these days | |
| [13:18] <ogra_> and all info i can get is "Segfault at 0x86" | |
| [13:18] <ogra_> in Xorg.0.log | |
| [13:20] * marvin24 didn't tried the new driver yet | |
| [13:20] <marvin24> I only heard of troubles so far ... | |
| [13:23] <ogra_> so lets see how well hrw did his job ... | |
| [13:23] * ogra_ installs gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf for the first time evar | |
| [13:25] <hrw> ;) | |
| [13:25] <hrw> ogra_: if you want to build !kernel then also 'apt-get install libc6-dev-armhf-cross' | |
| [13:25] <ogra_> will do | |
| [13:29] <janimo> ogra_, hmm I may have lied when telling you there's a single package needed. I remember hrw telling me I need that too but now I do not recall why it was needed for exactly | |
| [13:29] <ogra_> http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2012/03/26/ubuntu-12-04-precise-and-cross-compilation-of-arm-kernels/ | |
| [13:30] <ogra_> thats enough for me :) | |
| [13:30] <janimo> ogra_, you mean to build full debs not just zImages? | |
| [13:31] <janimo> ogra_, this is what I usually use debuild -eDEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="parallel=3" -eskipabi=true -eskipmodule=true -eCROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- -b -aarmhf -us -uc -nc | |
| [13:32] <janimo> you can make the parallel much more I guess | |
| [13:33] <janimo> I also usually set tools=false in debian.*/rules.d/armhf so I don't have to cross install other deps for linux-tools | |
| [13:33] <janimo> but for quick testing I just build zImage | |
| [13:37] <ogra_> yeah | |
| [13:48] <ogra_> hmm, so our kernel doesnt have NVHDCP enabled | |
| [13:49] <ogra_> and there seem to be a few new NVMAP options to play with | |
| [13:49] <ogra_> oh, and we dont have /dev/nvram enabled at all | |
| [13:56] <ogra_> hmm, building definitely doesnt work as advertised | |
| [13:56] <ogra_> (cross building that is) | |
| [13:57] <ogra_> nope, cant make it build | |
| [13:58] <ogra_> aha, only works if CROSS_COMPILE is set | |
| [13:58] <ogra_> janimo, i think there was something added to the linux package scripts to automatically set that in ubuntu kernels when cross building a package ... are we missing a merge ? | |
| [13:59] <janimo> ogra_, CROSS_COMPILE needs setting in env when doing simple make zImage | |
| [14:00] <ogra_> janimo, it shouldnt for the package | |
| [14:00] <janimo> also in the debuild line I pasted above | |
| [14:00] <ogra_> yes, but not in hrw's howto | |
| [14:00] <janimo> not sure if we are missing something, I did not work on other arm kernel packages | |
| [14:00] <ogra_> and i think the kernel team enhanced the scripts to auto xport that var during package builds | |
| [14:00] <janimo> I know, no idea really I just stuck to what works and what I learned last year here: https://wiki.linaro.org/Resources/HowTo/PackageYourOwnKernel | |
| [14:01] <janimo> ogra_, they may have done that, in which case I did not know about it to incorporate in our scripts | |
| [14:01] <janimo> I will if I find out :) | |
| [14:01] <ogra_> there was a ML discussion a while ago during precise | |
| [14:01] <janimo> I pasted that line to show what I used all the time and what worked for me for ac100 and armadaxp kernels too | |
| [14:02] <ogra_> right, that works here too (despite the fact that i dont like debuild and use dpkg-buildackage) | |
| [14:04] <ogra_> wow, that was fast (failed in tools since i didnt suppress them) | |
| [14:09] <ogra_> wow, i actually got all four cpu cores at 50°C ... havent seen them above 30 since i built that thing | |
| [14:10] <hrw> ;) | |
| [14:12] <hrw> curse m4 for lack of ifndef | |
| [14:27] <ogra_> grrr | |
| [14:27] <ogra_> i cant get past the failing tools | |
| [14:27] <ogra_> do_tools=false as documented everywhere doesnt seem to have any effect | |
| [14:40] <ogra_> oh CRAP ! | |
| [14:40] <ogra_> so debian.linaro overrides all defaults ? | |
| [14:40] <ogra_> *SIGH* | |
| [14:48] <ogra_> real 5m49.016s | |
| [14:48] <ogra_> user 13m47.740s | |
| [14:48] <ogra_> sys 1m23.897s | |
| [14:48] <ogra_> nice ! | |
| [15:26] <janimo> ogra_, did you only use parallel=3? user/real suggests something like that | |
| [15:26] <ogra_> =8 | |
| [15:27] <janimo> or maybe kernel builds is more deb packaging and linking that parallelizable compilation | |
| [15:27] <ogra_> i thought 4 cores should be able to handle 8 threads :) | |
| [15:27] <janimo> ogra_, they do, but the last bits - the packaging ones - are likely only using 1 thread | |
| [15:27] <ogra_> indeed | |
| [15:27] <janimo> probalby with plain make zImage you'd get a much better ratio :) | |
| [15:28] <janimo> but anyway, nice to have such fast turnaround now | |
| [15:28] <ogra_> oh, definitely, but with 13min for a package build i wont complain :) | |
| [15:28] <janimo> 13 user, real was 5 no? | |
| [15:29] <ogra_> yep | |
| === Ursinha` is now known as Ursinha | |
| === npitre_ is now known as npitre | |
| === gildean_ is now known as gildean | |
| [21:18] <infinity> ahs3`: *poke* | |
| [21:19] <infinity> ahs3`: That python-greenlet patch probably shouldn't be using uname to set CFLAGS in setup.py, since that's depending on the buildd environment, rather than the target. | |
| [21:20] <infinity> ahs3`: (In our case, it'll just get set universally for armel/armhf, since all our machines have that uname, but it still seems sketchy in the case where that's not true) | |
| [21:20] <ahs3`> infinity: hrm. is that the part that adds -fomit-frame-pointer? | |
| [21:20] <infinity> ahs3`: Yeah. | |
| [21:21] <infinity> ahs3`: I could just as easily be building on an armv5 machine with -mcpu=armv7-a, and that flag then wouldn't get set, though it should be. | |
| [21:22] <infinity> ahs3`: Seems harmless for the SRU and for our current buildds, but still inappropriate (IMO) for upstreaming. | |
| [21:22] <infinity> ahs3`: Then again, upstream seems to suffer that issue elsewhere too, so.. | |
| [21:23] <ahs3`> infinity: right. latest upstream has already moved well past this version and it's not needed there. but, there are several other ARM patches in 0.3.4 | |
| [21:23] <infinity> ahs3`: Mmkay. Then it doesn't bug me *as* much. | |
| [21:23] <infinity> ahs3`: (I note that upstream makes the same mistake with a uname=i386 check, so at least it's consistently broken) | |
| [21:23] <ahs3`> infinity: well, and bumping versions for SRU is a no-no, yeah? | |
| [21:24] <infinity> ahs3`: I assume this omitting of frame pointeryness won't break armel while fixing armhf? | |
| [21:24] <ahs3`> infinity: lol. oh, goody, we're consistently broken :) | |
| [21:24] <infinity> ahs3`: Yeah, bumping upstream versions is a no-no unless absolutely needed. I'm much happier with the backported patch option, as long as it works. | |
| [21:25] <ahs3`> infinity: i don't believe this will hurt armel; this only shows up in armhf | |
| [21:25] <ahs3`> (the bug, that is) | |
| [21:26] <infinity> Except, wait... | |
| [21:26] <infinity> -fomit-frame-pointer is included by default in -O2 anyway. | |
| [21:26] <infinity> Is there somewhere else where this is being forced to -O0 or something? | |
| [21:27] <ahs3`> not that i ever found :(. the only reason that's there is that it was not showing up on the gcc line when building | |
| [21:27] <ahs3`> i presumed that was being echoed correctly | |
| [21:28] <infinity> Right, it's in the default set. | |
| [21:28] <infinity> You'd need to use -fno-omit-frame-pointer to explicitly ask for the inverse. | |
| [21:28] <infinity> So, that part of the patch is probably a no-op. | |
| [21:29] <ahs3`> probably so; re-running the tests would confirm | |
| [21:29] <infinity> Anyhow, it's harmless either way, I'm not going to make anyone retest and reupload, if you know this version works. | |
| [21:29] <infinity> And if upstream no longer has that bit of code, all the better. | |
| [21:29] <ahs3`> it does. tested on armadaxp, on precise | |
| [21:30] <ahs3`> yup, plus other ARM fixes that would be nice to have, but oh well | |
| [21:30] <infinity> Well, feel free to backport more fixes. :P | |
| [21:31] <infinity> Unless the new upstream is really just "nothing but more ARM fixes", then we can talk version bumps. | |
| [21:31] <infinity> ahs3`: For now, accepting this into proposed. | |
| [21:31] <ahs3`> infinity: thx. unfortunately, it's a bunch more than just ARM stuff | |
| [21:32] <infinity> Well, even if the new upstream is "nothing but bugfixes with no new features", we could perhaps talk about that. | |
| [21:32] <infinity> But it's not even in quantal yet, so... | |
| [21:32] <infinity> We'll cross that bridge if anyone feels the urge to later. | |
| [21:32] <ahs3`> actually, it's already in quantal | |
| [21:33] <infinity> Is it? I thought Q was 0.3.3... You were talking 0.3.4 | |
| [21:33] <ahs3`> hrm. lemme look. i thought zul had gone to 0.3.4... | |
| [21:34] <infinity> Nope, and Debian's still at 0.3.3 as well. | |
| [21:35] <infinity> Bah, and the mips ASM is broken too. Is that fixed in 0.3.4 as well? | |
| [21:35] <infinity> If so, I might just NMU the new upstream. :P | |
| [21:35] <ahs3`> d'oh. yup. 0.3.3. | |
| [21:35] <ahs3`> lemme check the changelog. i don't recall seeing mips fixes, but i wasn't looking for them | |
| [21:37] <infinity> platform/switch_mips_unix.h: In function 'slp_switch': | |
| [21:37] <infinity> platform/switch_mips_unix.h:43:1: error: $fp cannot be used in asm here | |
| [21:37] <infinity> error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 | |
| [21:37] <infinity> It's so lovely when people write assembly blind. | |
| [21:37] <infinity> (I can only assume it was blind, since it's pretty obviously broken) | |
| [21:38] <ahs3`> looks like the last mips change (at least in the switcher code) was in 2010 :( | |
| [21:38] <infinity> Yeah, I'm seeing that. | |
| [21:38] <infinity> So, something externally broke it. | |
| [21:38] <infinity> Oh well. | |
| [21:39] <infinity> I don't have any mips machines to test on, and I can't see obvious breakage at a glance. | |
| [21:40] <infinity> Can I just go on the record as saying that python modules with hand-tuned assembly are a bit of a giggle? | |
| [21:41] <zul> ahs3`: 3.3 | |
| [21:41] <ahs3`> lol. absolutely. it is one of the more amusing bits of code i've seen | |
| [21:42] <ahs3`> zul: nod. i got 0.3.4 stuck in my head for some reason | |
| [21:42] <infinity> Anyhow. I might NMU ARM fixes into Debian, which would bring us in line (except for the dh_python2 switch), but that won't actually help the RCness in Debian, due to the mips breakage. :/ | |
| [21:43] <infinity> And if ARM is fixed upstream in 0.3.4 anyway, that seems like it might be wasted effort on my part. | |
| [21:43] <infinity> Erk. | |
| [21:44] <infinity> ahs3`: Is the testsuite still disabled in precise due to this breakage? | |
| [21:44] <infinity> ahs3` / zul: I may prefer to see "turning the testsuite back on" as part of the SRU, to prove it's all better. | |
| [21:44] <ahs3`> infinity: dunno. i don't think it was ever ENabled | |
| [21:44] <infinity> ahs3`: It's enabled in Debian, it's disabled in our packages because it was segfaulting on ARM. | |
| [21:45] <ahs3`> infinity: ah. then you should be able to enable it again; that's what was used to test the patch | |
| [22:04] <infinity> ahs3`: Alternately, this package is too much of a mess for me to try to make sense of. :P | |
| [22:04] <infinity> ahs3`: If someone tests the output of the buildds, I'll just scream LA LA LA and ignore the testsuite still being off. | |
| [22:05] <ahs3`> infinity: fair enough. testing we can do. | |
| === TheMuso` is now known as TheMuso | |
| === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | |