| [06:30] <PaoloRotolo> Good morning | |
| [09:08] <dpm> morning PaoloRotolo :) | |
| [09:52] <PaoloRotolo> hi dpm | |
| [10:37] <coolbhavi> hi PaoloRotolo dpm :) good noon! | |
| [10:41] <PaoloRotolo> hey coolbhavi | |
| [12:55] <dpm> hey coolbhavi :) | |
| [12:56] <coolbhavi> hey dpm | |
| [12:56] <coolbhavi> how have you been? | |
| [12:57] <dpm> busy busy, but well :) | |
| [12:57] <dpm> how's the voting coming along? | |
| [12:57] <coolbhavi> almost done around 90 apps | |
| [12:58] <coolbhavi> still to go | |
| [12:58] <coolbhavi> yours? | |
| [13:02] <coolbhavi> dpm, how to test time widget for harvest? | |
| [13:27] <dpm> coolbhavi, sorry, I don't know, I haven't come to that one | |
| [13:27] <dpm> slow progress here while I'm doing other things | |
| [13:28] <coolbhavi> dpm, no issues figured out it needs a harvest account on getharvest.com | |
| [13:30] <dpm> ok, cool | |
| [15:30] <mhall119> highvoltage: would it be considered bad form for me to review my own app submission and submit it for voting? | |
| [15:36] <mhall119> quickly-gtk is the only app showdown submission in "Needs Review" | |
| [15:37] <dpm> \o/ | |
| [15:37] <dpm> I guess you know how to contact the author :) | |
| [15:38] <mhall119> yeah, but I don't want to be the one to give it the green-light for voting | |
| [15:38] <mhall119> unless everyone else is okay with that | |
| [15:51] <dpm> makes sense :) | |
| [15:51] <stgraber> I don't have a problem with that, we're still going to review it as part of the voting process | |
| [15:52] <stgraber> it's not like you're voting on it or anything like that and I'm sure you passed it through the same checks as the rest of the lot | |
| [15:55] <mhall119> stgraber: cool,thanks | |
| [15:59] <mhall119> Pending Review == 0 \o/ | |
| [16:17] <highvoltage> mhall119: I can't see a reason why it would be bad form | |
| [16:17] <highvoltage> mhall119: actually I'm fine with any author giving their app up for voting, in an ideal world I guess that's how it would work | |
| [16:18] <highvoltage> mhall119: I think the only reason we mostly do things the way we do now is so that submitters can have an extra step where they get some guidance with their package | |
| [16:27] <mhall119> highvoltage: thanks, I've sent it to the ML | |
| [17:50] <jvrbanac> If someone has a spare moment, could someone move (On Trello) Wizz RSS over to Voting? I re-reviewed the app and the issues have been fixed. | |
| [18:00] <dpm> jvrbanac, done | |
| [18:04] <jvrbanac> dpm, Thanks! | |
| [18:46] <highvoltage> steam4linux!? | |
| [18:46] <highvoltage> and it's gplv3? | |
| [18:49] <stgraber> you didn't read the description apparently ;) | |
| [18:50] <highvoltage> yeah it was rather dissapointing :( | |
| [19:10] <jono> highvoltage, man, you are rocking the voting :-) | |
| [19:14] <pratik_narain> I would like to help reviewing the showdown apps | |
| [19:34] <mhall119> highvoltage: thanks for the votes, can you put your concerns about RedThat and Trading Cards as feedback on their MyApps page? | |
| [19:41] <highvoltage> mhall119: I can't see redthat in myapps, do you have a link? | |
| [19:48] <mhall119> highvoltage: https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/1138/ | |
| === achuni_ is now known as achuni | |
| [20:50] <Phoenix87> hallo | |
| [20:50] <Phoenix87> mhall119: hallo! you here? | |
| [20:51] <Phoenix87> i have received your comment on the feedback tab | |
| [20:54] <mhall119> Phoenix87: here | |
| [20:55] <Phoenix87> mhall119: do I have to change my branch or repackage the app again? | |
| [20:55] <Phoenix87> or both | |
| [20:55] <mhall119> Phoenix87: you should make the changes to debian/rules in your branch | |
| [20:56] <Phoenix87> mhall119: you mean debian/control ? | |
| [20:56] <mhall119> but you don't need to resubmit until you have other changes you want to submit, I've sent the current code + my changes for voting to get it into the Software Center | |
| [20:56] <mhall119> yes, sorry, debian/control | |
| [20:57] <Phoenix87> mhall119: ok. I have just merged your changes into my branch | |
| [20:57] <Phoenix87> thank you | |
| [20:59] <Phoenix87> mhall119: anyway, is there some sort of ubuntu arb policy about how "clean" lintian should be? In the past I had quite a hard times with debian mentors complaining about any warning spitted out by lintian | |
| [21:00] <Phoenix87> *time | |
| [21:03] <mhall119> Phoenix87: for ARB apps lintian will always spit out a bunch of file-or-dir-in-opt errors | |
| [21:03] <mhall119> but other than that I try and fix everything else | |
| [21:03] <mhall119> unless there's a good reason for not fixing it | |
| [21:04] <mhall119> the ARB is generally more lenient than DMs and DDs (though some of them are DMs or DDs I think) | |
| [21:04] <Phoenix87> mhall119: ok, good to know that. I should probably try to correct them myself then in order to ease your reviewing process. I just didn't know you were also aiming for a reasonable clean lintian | |
| [21:06] <mhall119> I think "reasonably clen" is a good standard :) | |
| [21:20] <Phoenix87> mhall119: :) | |