| === Jacky is now known as GLaDOS | |
| === GLaDOS is now known as Guest12539 | |
| === emma is now known as em | |
| === samsul_ is now known as kacung | |
| [02:35] <Bluefoxicy> bluefox@icebox:~$ sudo fstrim -v / | |
| [02:35] <Bluefoxicy> [sudo] password for bluefox: | |
| [02:36] <Bluefoxicy> /: 10519232512 bytes were trimmed | |
| [02:36] <Bluefoxicy> how about running fstrim in a cron job? | |
| === IAmNotThatGuy is now known as M0hi | |
| === Guest12539 is now known as Jacky | |
| [10:42] <Fudge> howdy | |
| === skynet-2000 is now known as skynet | |
| === skynet is now known as Guest32951 | |
| [15:12] <BluesKaj> hey all | |
| [20:11] <rrva> hi! I want to slim down on memory usage on my ubuntu precise laptop. What the best route to go? I use gnome3 desktop but there are waaay to many processes running after I did a default install. There are many things I personally do not need. Any common guides on what packages to purge? | |
| [20:12] <penguin42> rrva: This channel is for the next ubuntu - quantal - Precise is in #ubuntu | |
| [20:13] <rrva> ok what would quantal guidelines be? | |
| [20:14] <genii-around> They would be the same. You are better to ask in the correct channel | |
| === Guest32951 is now known as skynet-2000 | |
| [20:45] <MrChrisDruif> jbicha; what section should I definitely read on http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/ before I try to tackle my own bug? | |
| [21:07] <jbicha> MrChrisDruif: you definitely need getting set up, but there are several other parts that are probably important too | |
| [21:09] <MrChrisDruif> Yeah. I'm curious btw who decided to give epiphany-browser in quantal version number 3.5.1-0ubuntu1 ....debian sid is still at 3.4.2-1 | |
| [21:11] <MrChrisDruif> jbicha; packages are grabbed from debian sid right? | |
| === wilee-nilee is now known as trollpro | |
| === trollpro is now known as protroll | |
| [21:15] <jbicha> MrChrisDruif: not really, epiphany-browser is part of GNOME and 3.5.1 is the first development snapshot of what will be GNOME 3.6 | |
| [21:17] <MrChrisDruif> And gnome 3.6 will be included in 12.10? If so, why is only epiphany-extensions updated and the rest not? <_<" | |
| [21:18] <jbicha> GNOME didn't release a version 3.5.1 of epiphany-extensions | |
| [21:20] <MrChrisDruif> That's what making me curious why Ubuntu does have one | |
| [21:20] <jbicha> when it is time for a release, some parts of GNOME haven't changes, or the developer might be busy | |
| [21:21] <jbicha> here's a list of all of the GNOME releases in May: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ftp-release-list/2012-May/thread.html | |
| [21:22] <MrChrisDruif> Well, -extensions is still 3.4.0-2 while -browser is at 3.5.1-0ubuntu1 O_O | |
| [21:22] <jbicha> right and that's fine, the extensions still work, right? | |
| [21:23] <jbicha> you'll also need http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/fixing-a-bug.html | |
| [21:24] <jbicha> and the part that needs fixing is in debian/control.in and debian/control | |
| === wilee-nilee is now known as Fyodorovna | |