| [00:02] <ScottK> Done. | |
| [00:03] <Darkwing> :D | |
| [02:14] <rbelem> ScottK, ping | |
| [02:17] <rbelem> is there a tag for kde 4.8.2? | |
| [02:26] <rbelem> bulldog98_, there wasn't a branch for active untill some days ago, that's why i did not get the patches | |
| [03:16] <ScottK> rbelem: 4.8.2 is in precise. | |
| [03:22] <rbelem> ScottK, i forgot to mention git :-) | |
| [03:22] <ScottK> No idea. | |
| [03:22] <rbelem> ScottK, upstream git | |
| [03:22] <ScottK> I'd assume so. | |
| [03:23] * ScottK is Kubuntu guy, not upstream. | |
| [03:23] <rbelem> :-) | |
| [03:24] <rbelem> i updated a patch for kdelibs from plasma active | |
| [03:26] <ScottK> It's really too late. How critical is it? | |
| [03:26] <ScottK> We'll probably have to do it as a post-release update now. | |
| [03:27] <ScottK> (unless it's really critical) | |
| [03:29] <rbelem> ScottK, some apps are not behaving properly in plasma-active | |
| [03:29] <rbelem> ScottK, i think it is ok to release a fix later | |
| [03:29] <ScottK> Unless it prevents a successful install, that sounds like something we could do post-release. | |
| [03:29] <ScottK> Good. | |
| [03:29] <rbelem> :-) | |
| [03:30] <ScottK> We can ask to have the Kubuntu Active ISO redone at 12.04.1 if we have some good fixes and people to test it even though it's not LTS. | |
| [03:31] <rbelem> that would be really nice :-) | |
| [03:32] <ScottK> Excellent. | |
| [03:39] <ScottK> Shouldn't be a problem. | |
| [03:50] <rbelem> thanks ScottK | |
| [03:50] <rbelem> :-) | |
| === jalcine is now known as JackyAlcine | |
| [07:40] <Riddell> ScottK: I've added kubuntu-docs to the desktop CD, I recon they fit easily, how did you calculate that they don't? | |
| [08:30] <yurchor> Hi! Will it be asking too much if I ask to fix typos in Kubuntu own docs (last night package)? (Yes, I filed bug report (Bug 852519), but there was zero reaction on it. Does it really matter to file bug reports at all?) | |
| [08:30] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 852519 in kubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) "Typos and missing entity in Kubuntu 11.10 documentation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/852519 | |
| [08:31] <Riddell> yurchor: it all depends if the person incharge of the package is crazy busy or not | |
| [08:32] <Riddell> alas most of us are crazy busy most of the time | |
| [08:32] <Riddell> fixing typos is of course welcome | |
| [08:32] <Riddell> although better would be to check if it still exists in 12.04 | |
| [08:34] <yurchor> Riddell: Ok. They stiil exist. And David added the new ones. So if Darkwing have no time to fix this, just mark it as WONTFIX and I will forget about it. ;) | |
| [10:43] <Riddell> Darkwing: that guy was a omg writer! http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/04/kubuntu-they-have-invested-millions-in-it/ | |
| [10:44] <Riddell> Darkwing: I haven't seen littlegirl on irc for a bit, is she still around? | |
| [10:49] <ScottK> Riddell: They fit now, but if they get translations again they may not fit for the point releases. | |
| [10:50] <ScottK> If you use the size of the docs in oneiric then the images are all at or over 702. | |
| [10:50] <Riddell> ScottK: mm yes, I wonder if it's an idea to split out the translations in that case | |
| [10:50] <ScottK> I'm OK either way if you decide not to worry about it, we can cross that bridge when we come to it. | |
| [10:51] <ScottK> Riddell: Did you see the ping from skaet about filling out the rest of the manifest? | |
| [11:07] <Riddell> ScottK: yes thanks | |
| [11:07] <Riddell> ScottK: the amd64+mac images I think we have no testers for and should not release | |
| [11:07] <ScottK> Agreed, but I'd wait and see for sure. We've had occasional testers. | |
| [11:07] <Riddell> I was wanting to give one more test to armhf+omap4 before I'm happy to say we expect to release that | |
| [11:08] <ScottK> shadeslayer has said he might do it if he didn't have exams. | |
| [11:08] * ScottK needs to go. Back in an hour or so. | |
| [11:08] <Riddell> kubuntu-active I've been testing this morning and does work but has a pesky 5 minute pause on startup (I think soprano to blame) | |
| [11:08] <ScottK> rbelem said he had a new active patch for kde4libs. We agreed it could go post-release. | |
| [11:09] <ScottK> I also talked to skaet about respinning active for 12.04.1 and she was fine with it as long as we had testers. | |
| [11:09] <ScottK> now really leaving | |
| === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch | |
| [11:49] <BluesKaj> Howdy all | |
| [11:56] <ScottK> Back. Sort of (really laggy connection). | |
| === greyback|lunch is now known as greyback | |
| [13:16] <Darkwing> Riddell: Yeah, he pinged me last night about doing a writeup... | |
| [13:16] <Darkwing> Riddell: and littlergirl hops on and off... I think she is waiting to be unleased on docs again. | |
| [13:21] <afiestas> I wonder if ubuntu is aware of this bug: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2771 | |
| [13:21] <afiestas> can we check taht in launchpad? launchpad connects to bugtracks,. right? | |
| [13:26] <debfx> not to every bugtracker software | |
| [13:27] <debfx> bug #965371 | |
| [13:27] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 965371 in openssl (Ubuntu Precise) "HTTPS requests fail on some sites on Ubuntu 12.04" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/965371 | |
| [13:31] <Riddell> i don't have a login for that rt.openssl.org site | |
| [13:31] <Riddell> jdstroud is the security guy for ubuntu and likely to know about that stuff | |
| [13:33] <debfx> that lp bug has all the information | |
| [14:01] <afiestas> debfx: thansk! I did looked for the bug but it has many different names depending on the distro | |
| [14:01] <afiestas> it doesn't seems medium to me xD | |
| [14:02] <afiestas> anyway, I need to rebuild webaccounts but including the packags in this ppa: https://launchpad.net/~cyberspace/+archive/cyber-stuff | |
| [14:02] <afiestas> I klnow is not the first time I ask this, but, how can I add that ppa to the recipe? | |
| [14:02] <afiestas> I need libakonadi-dev to build webaccounts | |
| [14:05] <shadeslayer> ScottK: afaik the mac images don't have anything different than the standard images, I'll be able to test it though :) | |
| [14:06] <ScottK> They do. They boot differently. | |
| [14:06] <ScottK> Riddell: ^^^ Tester ahoy. | |
| [14:13] <apol> can somebody tell me what should I do to apply a patch to a package? | |
| [14:26] <Riddell> shadeslayer: are you able to do a smoketest today? | |
| [14:27] <Riddell> afiestas: I'm not sure what you mean, adding a dependency to the webaccounts's package is done by adding it to debian/control in the packaging bzr branch | |
| [14:27] <Riddell> apol: several ways depending on package but generally you put it in debian/patches and add the filename to debian/patches/series | |
| [14:28] <apol> Riddell: it's for muon in çcyberspace | |
| [14:28] <apol> ok | |
| [14:28] <shadeslayer> Riddell: ofcourse, I just need some time to download the ISO | |
| [14:29] <shadeslayer> my old laptop bit the dust after 4 years | |
| [14:29] <shadeslayer> just because nVidia cheaped out on the thermal paste *grumble* | |
| [14:29] <shadeslayer> ( Could have just as easily been Dell ) | |
| [14:29] <apol> Riddell: and it's a normal git patch... is that ok? | |
| [14:31] <Riddell> apol: unified diff format at -p1 level is what it needs | |
| [14:31] <Riddell> which is what git produces | |
| [14:31] <apol> ok | |
| [14:31] <apol> cool | |
| [14:31] <Riddell> apol: the patches are managed using a command called quilt | |
| [14:31] <Riddell> so if you want to test that it works you can run quilt push | |
| [14:31] <Riddell> (and quilt pop to undo) | |
| [14:32] <apol> ok thx | |
| [14:32] <apol> 9 | |
| [14:32] <apol> oops | |
| [14:37] <BluesKaj> Riddell, any truth to the rumours about the "Kubuntu" name being witheld by Canonical from use by Blue Systems? | |
| [14:39] <ScottK> BluesKaj: I suspect any rumors that anyone knows anything for sure are wrong. | |
| [14:41] <BluesKaj> ScottK, rumours were circulating yeserday and it would be nice if they were put to rest | |
| [14:41] <ScottK> Sure, but the only way to do that would be a definitive announcement. | |
| [14:41] <ScottK> I'd imagine if things were ready for that, it would have been announced. | |
| [14:42] <ScottK> In the meantime, rumors are rumors. | |
| [14:42] <ScottK> If you read the Ubuntu Trademark policy, it clearly says that commercial use requires permission from Canonical. | |
| [14:43] <BluesKaj> a debian derivative using kde is fine with me ..."a rose by any other name " | |
| [14:45] <BluesKaj> Canonical has plotted a different course for it's distro with unity etc , so kde is being left behind in the dust | |
| [14:47] <tsimpson> that's a little unfair | |
| [14:48] <Riddell> BluesKaj: the trademark licence is available for all to see | |
| [14:50] <Darkwing> I wouldn't go as far to say that it is unfair though... | |
| [14:50] <Darkwing> Ubuntu and the related names is a Brand owned and paid for by Canonical. It would not be unfair of them to enforce something that they have paid for. That is buisness. | |
| [14:50] <tsimpson> I mean the comment was unfair | |
| [14:51] <Darkwing> ahhh yeah. | |
| [14:52] <BluesKaj> policy declarations ar fine , but a kubuntu sign on an OS , doesn't mean the ports are open :) | |
| [14:57] * ScottK isn't sure what that means. | |
| [15:03] <BluesKaj> oh i think you do..you just don't want to add fuel to the fire being an ubuntu member etc..it's understandable | |
| [15:04] <BluesKaj> anyway ...it's just rumours and ltes hope hey're baseless | |
| [15:04] <BluesKaj> lets | |
| [15:07] <ScottK> BluesKaj: No. Actually I don't. | |
| [15:07] <ScottK> I don't intend to contribute to the rumors either way though. | |
| [15:09] <BluesKaj> ScottK, understood | |
| [15:09] * Darkwing reads up | |
| [15:13] <ScottK> Riddell: Main only Lucid -> Precise works. | |
| [15:19] <Riddell> ScottK: great thanks | |
| === mck182 is now known as mck182|afk | |
| === mck182|afk is now known as mck182 | |
| === jalcine is now known as Guest31570 | |
| [20:02] <cmagina> anyone else notice that gstreamer0.10-plugins-good now causes the gnome-keyring to be installed? (it gets pulled in by the libsoup-gnome2.4-1 dependency) | |
| [20:21] <debfx> cmagina: libsoup pulls in libgnome-keyring0 but not gnome-keyring | |
| === jalcine_ is now known as JackyAlcine | |