|
[00:00] <dakira> mgrandi: argh.. I think I see what happened |
|
[00:00] <mgrandi> oh? |
|
[00:01] <mgrandi> did addpatch add a bunch of files? |
|
[00:02] <dakira> bzr lp-propose automaticalle selected lp:ubuntu/compiz as the branch to merge with. That is the branch where the development takes place. lp:compiz is where the merge should happen (it only contains the debian directory) |
|
[00:03] <mgrandi> ah yeah |
|
[00:03] <mgrandi> it did seem like there were a bunch of files that were present and got added |
|
[00:04] <mgrandi> because the branches diverged |
|
[00:04] <mgrandi> so what is lp:compiz then if dev happens at ubuntu/compiz |
|
[00:04] <poolie> upstream development ought to be in lp:compiz |
|
[00:04] <poolie> well |
|
[00:04] <poolie> that ought to be a mirror, i suppose |
|
[00:05] <mgrandi> ah makes sense |
|
[00:05] <dakira> https://code.launchpad.net/~compiz/compiz/ubuntu |
|
[00:05] <mgrandi> so yeah, just change the merge proposal dest and you should be good |
|
[00:05] <dakira> this branch is listed in debian/control under the Vcs-Bzr tag |
|
[00:06] <mgrandi> hmm |
|
[00:07] <mgrandi> im not too familiar with how lp-propose works |
|
[00:07] <mgrandi> but poolie can help hehe! |
|
[00:07] <mgrandi> i have to go, gl |
|
[00:13] <dakira> poolie: so what do I have to enter as the target branch if I want the above to be the target branch? |
|
[00:15] <dakira> When I try to propose my branch to be merged back into lp:compiz I get "This branch is not mergeable into lp:compiz." |
|
[00:29] <dakira> okay.. this looks better https://code.launchpad.net/~mniess/ubuntu/precise/compiz/fix-screenshot/+merge/100539 |
|
[07:03] <vila> hi all |
|
[08:23] <mgz> morning |
|
[08:24] <lifeless> ok look, its wgz renamed :P |
|
[08:27] <fullermd> He's not renamed, he's just on the other side of the world from you, so he looks upside-down. |
|
=== quicksil1er is now known as quicksilver |
|
[08:37] <mgz> we are certainly each other's evil twin |
|
[08:49] <fullermd> That's just the sort of thing an evil twin would WANT us to believe. |
|
[09:37] <lifeless> spiv: https://code.launchpad.net/~spiv/ubuntu/lucid/paramiko/address-families-579530-lucid/+merge/25297 |
|
[09:37] <lifeless> spiv: perhaps that needs a 'delete' button clicked on it or something. I imagine its still in your activereviews list |
|
[10:34] <jelmer> mgz, vila: are we hanging out now? |
|
[10:34] <vila> jelmer: waiting for poolie ? |
|
[10:35] <mgz> jelmer: that's the general plan |
|
[10:37] <poolie> hi all |
|
[10:37] <jelmer> hi.. |
|
[10:37] <vila> h... |
|
[10:37] <vila> hi poolie |
|
[10:40] <poolie_> hi |
|
[10:40] <poolie_> am i here? |
|
[10:40] <jelmer> poolie_: hi |
|
[10:57] <jml> how can I eliminate this warning? 2012-04-03 10:57:12,217 - udd.scripts.mass_import - WARNING - Error accessing max threads file /srv/package-import.canonical.com/new/max_threads: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/srv/package-import.canonical.com/new/max_threads' |
|
[11:46] <poolie_> jml, hi, does the file exist? |
|
[11:47] <jml> poolie_: no. when I create it empty the error goes away. useful error huh? |
|
[12:11] <poolie_> :/ |
|
[12:11] <poolie_> it's a bit hardcoded |
|
[12:11] <poolie_> whack james |
|
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel |
|
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan |
|
[14:59] <ErwinM> Hi, I am looking for the automv plugin, but it seems gone |
|
[15:00] <ErwinM> http://bzr.oxygene.sk/bzr-plugins/automv/ <-- empty |
|
[15:00] <jelmer> ErwinM: it's now in bzr core I think |
|
[15:00] <jelmer> ErwinM: "bzr mv --auto" |
|
[15:00] <ErwinM> Aha, thanks |
|
[15:01] <ErwinM> Yes, that worked just fine. :-) |
|
[15:02] <jam> jml: echo 5 > /..../max_threads ? |
|
[15:03] <jam> I believe it does a live check to allow you to turn up and down the number of running threads |
|
[15:03] <jam> (udd uses it to lower throughput when LP is under high load) |
|
[15:03] <jam> I think warning is probably useful for UDD, since it indicates a configuration error. |
|
[15:04] <jam> Not as useful for your project, though. |
|
[15:04] <jam> anyway, EOD here, have a good evening to all. |
|
[15:04] <jml> jam: it runs when the file is empty |
|
[15:04] <jml> jam: so it's a bogus warning. |
|
[15:04] <jam> jml: well, I'm sure there is a default num threads. |
|
[15:04] <jam> But not having the file would be a misconfiguration for UDD |
|
[15:04] <jml> pha |
|
[15:05] <jam> jml: I can see your point, it is just a "how generic is this code" issue. It isn't super-duper useful for UDD |
|
[15:05] <jam> other than if we set a value and it doesn't take |
|
[15:05] <jam> a warning helps understand if we accidentally have the file owned as "root" for example |
|
=== lool- is now known as lool |
|
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] |
|
[16:51] <Merwin_> Hey, I've got would like to make patch using diff of a revision range A..B but excluding the rev XXX, how can I do this ? |
|
[16:51] <Merwin_> I would like* |
|
[16:52] <mgz> I would... make a new branch -r B, merge -rXXX...(XXX-1), and diff -rA.. |
|
[16:53] <Merwin_> Hum good idea, I'll try, thank you |
|
[16:59] <Merwin_> Erf, I tried to remove a colo-branch with bzr rmbranch and know my depo is unusable... |
|
[17:00] <Merwin_> I had no pushed commits... |
|
[17:00] <Merwin_> bzr: ERROR: No repository present: "file:///home/thibaut/OpenERP%206/OpenAssur/addons-opas/" |
|
[17:00] <Merwin_> Seriously, I lost everything ? |
|
[17:01] <mgz> hm, and I'm not sure the fix for bug 922953 has been landed on 2.5 |
|
[17:01] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 922953 in Bazaar "rmbranch should refuse removing active branch" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/922953 |
|
[17:02] <Merwin_> I used bzr rmbranch mycolobranch |
|
[17:02] <Merwin_> How can I fix that mgz ? I had work I didn't pushed, is it lost ? |
|
[17:02] <mgz> welcome to the git way of working, I guess... |
|
[17:02] <mgz> am checking to see if pre-fix there was a way of recovering or not |
|
[17:03] <Merwin_> I don't understand why it removed my trunk branch wheras I told him to remove a colo branch Oo |
|
[17:04] <mgz> see also bug 920653 |
|
[17:04] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 920653 in Bazaar ""bzr rmbranch" doesn't handle colocated branches" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/920653 |
|
[17:05] <Merwin_> ... |
|
[17:06] <Merwin_> Here, I don't even have a branch, brz branches prints nothing... |
|
[17:06] <mgz> I did recover from doing various daft things with colo, but don't recall which issue was which |
|
[17:06] <mgz> jelmer: any suggestions? |
|
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck |
|
[17:08] <Merwin_> or vila maybe ? |
|
[17:09] <Merwin_> Please tell me I'll be able to push my last 2 hours work I just commited before doing this :D |
|
[17:11] <mgz> there's always the filesystem recovery tool route |
|
[17:12] <Merwin_> At least it didn't removed the files... |
|
[17:13] <mgz> just the repo and branch metadata, not the tree, right? |
|
[17:13] <mgz> comma after repo. |
|
[17:13] <Merwin_> Yep I guess, I've got a .bzr dir and my files are still there |
|
[17:14] <Merwin_> So, I've got to call my boss est tell him why I can't push the things we were supposed to put in production tonight (I was making a patch for this) |
|
[17:14] <mgz> but no repository/ or branch/ inside, right? |
|
[17:14] <Merwin_> branch branches branch-format branch-lock checkout README |
|
[17:14] <Merwin_> In .bzr |
|
[17:16] <mgz> Merwin_: so, you have your actual changes, so this isn't a complete disaster |
|
[17:16] <mgz> can either branch from previous location, copy tree across and commit for now |
|
[17:17] <mgz> or.. it was a fresh project? recreate and copy tree, add and commit |
|
[17:17] <Merwin_> I can't commit |
|
[17:17] <mgz> in that branch. |
|
[17:17] <mgz> you can make a new one. |
|
[17:17] <Merwin_> Hum |
|
[17:17] <mgz> which unblocks you for tonight. |
|
[17:17] <Merwin_> I try |
|
[17:18] <Merwin_> Don't seems to work: bzr branch actual_dir new_dir |
|
[17:18] <Merwin_> Same error: bzr: ERROR: No repository present: "file:///home/thibaut/OpenERP%206/OpenAssur/addons-opas/" |
|
[17:18] <mgz> Merwin_: so, did you create this from scratch 2 hours ago, or branch from an origin? |
|
[17:19] <Merwin_> Nope, it's a long time branch I used for weeks |
|
[17:19] <mgz> but you have no other version of the same base project anywhere? |
|
[17:19] <Merwin_> Yes, on our dev server |
|
[17:20] <Merwin_> Where I regulary push |
|
[17:20] <mgz> okay, so branch from that. |
|
[17:20] <Merwin_> But I won't have the last commit I made in my branch (the one I did't pushed yet) |
|
[17:20] <mgz> then copy in your changes from today, and do one big commit. |
|
[17:21] <Merwin_> Ok |
|
[17:21] <mgz> you lose any little commits you did along the way, but the changes are still there. |
|
[17:21] <mgz> and +affectsmetoo that bug I linked :) |
|
[17:21] <Merwin_> That's enought for tonight |
|
[17:22] <Merwin_> I did it thank you. It's a hudge repo, it's downloading I keep you informed :) |
|
[17:23] <mgz> :) |
|
[17:30] <Merwin_> mgz, while it's downloading, could you tell me how I'm supposed to remove a colo-branch ? |
|
[17:30] <mgz> that would be the way, it's just buggy in 2.5.0 |
|
[17:31] <mgz> it should be roughly equivalent to removing the dir .bzr/branches/NAME though |
|
[17:31] <Merwin_> ok... |
|
[17:37] <mgz> not your fault, basically |
|
[17:39] <Merwin_> mgz, merge -r 552.1.1...X => What should I put at X? |
|
[17:39] <Merwin_> I want to undo the commit 552.1.1 |
|
[17:40] <mgz> 552 |
|
[17:40] <Merwin_> Looking at qlog, it seems that its 'ancestor' is 552. |
|
[17:40] <Merwin_> Ok |
|
[17:40] <mgz> it's easy in that case, .1 follows from the without-dot form always |
|
[17:42] <Merwin_> Hum, my patch contains binary files that I want to have |
|
[17:42] <Merwin_> It doesn't seems to handle binary files (OpenOffice .sxw, models for generating PDF) |
|
[17:43] <Merwin_> I'll have to add them manually ? |
|
[17:44] <mgz> you mean the textual patch only says "binary file added" but you want to be able to apply it and have the files added? |
|
[17:44] <Merwin_> Yes, exactly :) |
|
[17:45] <Merwin_> I don't have a lot I can push them via SFTP, it's not a problem, I'm just curious if there is a way to handle this |
|
[17:46] <mgz> you can just use a different diff format I think. |
|
=== CardinalFang is now known as qengho |
|
[19:11] <mgrandi> hey jelmer if you are there, i remember you saying yesterday that you took out the fast export from x stuff from bzr-fastimport, does that include the bzr fast import (from svn dumpfile)? |
|
[19:12] <jelmer> mgrandi: bzr fast improt never supported importing from a svn dump file |
|
[19:12] <jelmer> mgrandi: bzr-svn supports importing from a dumpfile |
|
[19:12] <mgrandi> hmm, does that get called by bzr fast-import? |
|
[19:12] <jelmer> mgrandi: no, they're unrelated |
|
[19:12] <mgrandi> just trying to understand the structure a bit |
|
[19:13] <mgrandi> how did i import that svn dumpfile then |
|
[19:13] <jelmer> mgrandi: bzr-fastimport only deals with the fastimport/fastexport format used by git-fastexport |
|
[19:13] <jelmer> mgrandi: with bzr-svn I think? "bzr svn-import <dumpfile> <target>" ? |
|
[19:14] <mgrandi> yeah |
|
[19:14] <mgrandi> that seems like it, ok. I was going to say since import from dumpfile seemed important |
|
[19:15] <jelmer> mgrandi: it doesn't read the dumpfile directly |
|
[19:15] <jelmer> mgrandi: it creates a svn repo first from the dumpfile, and then uses that |
|
[19:15] <mgrandi> yeah |
|
[19:16] <mgrandi> i meant the general concept of importing from a dumpfile since svn doesn't seem to have fast-export |
|
[19:16] <mgrandi> at least i think |
|
[19:17] <jelmer> mgrandi: subvertpy has a 'subvertpy-fast-export' command that can generate a fast-export stream |
|
[19:18] <mgrandi> ah ok. |
|
[19:19] <mgrandi> also, before you dissapear again, i was wondering if there was anything to kinda 'verify' the integrity of a branch, or is it just bzr check |
|
[19:20] <jelmer> mgrandi: just 'bzr check' |
|
[19:21] <jelmer> mgrandi: generally, it's better to just talk to the svn repo directly rather than using a dumpfile |
|
[19:21] <mgrandi> yeah that makes sense. let svn worry about the dump file. |
|
[19:21] <mgrandi> but i was wondering cause im going to see if this bzr plugin for a IDE works, but it hasn't been updated in like a year so i have no idea if it still works |
|
[19:32] <jelmer> mgrandi: the svn dumpfile is a distraction, it just adds two extra steps to the process |
|
=== r0bby is now known as robbyoconnor |
|
=== ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch |
|
[22:34] <poolie_> hi all |
|
[22:37] <jelmer> 'morning poolie_ |
|
[22:37] <LeoNerd> Can I somehow "bzr ignore" files in a directory that don't have an extension (i.e. a "." in their name). These will be compiled binaries, but I don't want to ignore e.g. the .c source for them |
|
[22:38] <mgrandi> should be able to with regular expressions |
|
[22:39] <mgrandi> which i believe bzr uses for bzrignore |
|
[22:39] <LeoNerd> Mhmm? |
|
[22:40] <mgrandi> bzr ignore "RE:^#" |
|
[22:40] <mgrandi> so to do a reg exp you put RE: |
|
[22:40] <mgrandi> you can also look at 'bzr help ignore' for some more examples, you can also tell it to nOT ignore .c files |
|
[22:40] <mgrandi> so, tell it to ignore everything in that directory, but not c files maybe? |
|
[22:41] <LeoNerd> Oooh that might work too |
|
[22:41] <bob2> or just ignore them all and add -f the source |
|
[22:41] <LeoNerd> Nah, 'cause I'd still like to be reminded about new files in case I forget :) |
|
[22:42] <wgz> LeoNerd: `bzr help ignore` |
|
[22:43] <mgrandi> so add "somedirectory/*", and then "!somedirectory/*.c" |
|
[22:43] <wgz> ...and I was scrolled up a little |
|
[22:44] <mgrandi> time to go, laterz |
|
[22:46] <wgz> can also do exactly "that don't have a dot in the name" with /[^.]*/ |
|
[22:46] <LeoNerd> That got it :) |
|
[22:46] <LeoNerd> RE:examples/demo-[^.]+ |
|
|