| [08:42] <aviksil> Spads: ping | |
| [08:47] <Spads> er, hello | |
| [09:24] <aviksil> Spads: Is this build error due to QEMU ARM test builder: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/overlay/+build/3285688 | |
| [09:26] <Spads> qemu: Unsupported syscall: 336 | |
| [09:26] <Spads> ^-- This would suggest it was. | |
| [09:26] <Spads> Do you have a link to the actual build page, rather than just the log? | |
| [09:26] <Spads> oh n'mind, I'm the one who followed the log link :) | |
| [09:28] <aviksil> ok. so what should be the workaround? or is there any way to schedule build on real armel builder? | |
| [09:30] <aviksil> Spads: ^^^ | |
| [09:31] <Spads> you'd have to ask IS about access to physical builders, but I'm filing a bug against qemu-linaro now | |
| [09:31] <aviksil> Spads: ok | |
| [09:33] <aviksil> Spads: and also, on a similar note, are these armel build failures due to QEMU builder too: https://code.launchpad.net/~aviksil/+recipe/lttng-ust-daily? | |
| [09:35] <Spads> possibly. I recommend you file bugs against qemu-linaro about them. | |
| [09:35] <aviksil> Spads: ok, thanks, will do | |
| [09:49] <DNX> hi guys! Do I have any chance to change my username with another already existing but unused? | |
| [09:50] <DNX> here is the account: https://launchpad.net/~dnx | |
| [09:51] <DNX> RoMiONeT is not an active member of any Launchpad teams. | |
| [09:51] <DNX> Karma: 0 | |
| [09:51] <DNX> since 2009-09-28 | |
| [09:51] <czajkowski> DNX: you could mail them just because they don't have karma doesnt really mean they don't use LP | |
| [09:52] <DNX> of course czajkowski, thank you! | |
| [09:52] <czajkowski> np | |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging | |
| [09:52] * benonsoftware only got benny as the username because he emailed the old benny :P | |
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | |
| === menesis1 is now known as menesis | |
| === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell | |
| === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell | |
| [15:20] <czajkowski> what would you like hear more about from launchpad? https://www.facebook.com/questions/326779177369296/ | |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | |
| === Quintasan is now known as trolllogger | |
| === trolllogger is now known as Quintasan | |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | |
| [17:02] <cjohnston> so I see that the work items part of BPs is now live.. are they going to be migrated? | |
| [17:06] <czajkowski> cjohnston: yes after the release of 12.04 | |
| [17:08] <cjohnston> hrm.. so an email should probably go out to Ubuntu MLs telling them status.u.c won't pick up items that are in the new field | |
| [17:09] <czajkowski> mrevell: can you comment ? | |
| [17:10] <czajkowski> salgado isn't around | |
| [17:10] <mrevell> cjohnston, status.u.c does pick up work items that are in the new field. It picks up the work items whether they're in the whiteboard or the new work items box. | |
| [17:11] <cjohnston> I just found that mrevell.. wasn't aware that it had been updated. must have missed that MP.. thanks | |
| [17:11] <mrevell> np :) | |
| [17:11] <czajkowski> cjohnston: sorted :) | |
| [17:11] <czajkowski> mrevell: thanks | |
| [17:12] <cjohnston> ty czajkowski | |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | |
| [17:35] * mgedmin got more launchpad email about bug 190848, all without the bug title in the subject | |
| [17:35] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 190848 in Fontconfig "font in terminal does not resemble font in preview" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190848 | |
| [17:38] <czajkowski> mgedmin: thats the same bug as before right ? | |
| [17:39] <mgedmin> yes | |
| [17:40] <czajkowski> mgedmin: and did you change your bug mail settings, | |
| [17:40] <mgedmin> no | |
| [17:40] <czajkowski> :) | |
| [17:53] <dobey> mgedmin: i'm pretty certain that's a bug in launchpad's upstream bug watcher code. you should file a bug against launchpad itself | |
| [17:55] <mgedmin> oh, it looks like somebody already did: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/138775 | |
| [17:55] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 138775 in Launchpad itself "Notification subject included bug number but no summary" [Low,Triaged] | |
| [17:55] <dobey> ah, ok | |
| [17:55] <dobey> that is pretty old | |
| [18:10] <bdmurray> czajkowski: I'm trying to file a bug with apport and I'm consistently getting an oops report and I'd like to find out if it is something with apport or Launchpad. | |
| [18:10] <czajkowski> hmm | |
| [18:11] <czajkowski> haev you got a oops number? | |
| [18:11] <bdmurray> Error ID: OOPS-784b24ada04f53ab155d80242075ed70 | |
| [18:11] <ubot5> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=784b24ada04f53ab155d80242075ed70 | |
| [18:13] <czajkowski> bdmurray: wondering is it to do with apport as lp is fine | |
| [18:13] <czajkowski> but I'm unsure | |
| [18:14] <czajkowski> rick_h: are you about ? | |
| [18:15] <jokerdino> hello people.. | |
| [18:15] <jokerdino> the translation for this template https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/sound-theme-freedesktop/+pots/sound-theme-freedesktop/ta/+translate?show=untranslated does not update for Tamil | |
| [18:16] <jokerdino> it keeps saying one string hasn't been translated when it has already been done with. | |
| [18:16] <rick_h> czajkowski: what's up? | |
| [18:17] <czajkowski> rick_h: could you help bdmurray please as unsure | |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | |
| [18:17] <rick_h> looking at the oops | |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | |
| [18:19] <czajkowski> thanks you | |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging | |
| [18:20] <rick_h> bdmurray: so it looks like LP is rejecting it because the description on the bug report is > 50000 characters long | |
| [18:20] <jokerdino> happy weekend then czajkowski | |
| [18:20] <rick_h> I'm guessing apport submitted the description or did you write it out? | |
| [18:20] <rick_h> bdmurray: if it's apport, then probably need to file a bug that they need to keep the descriptoin under that limit | |
| [18:21] <rick_h> bdmurray: if you wrote it, any chance of shortening it up? | |
| [18:21] <bdmurray> rick_h: do you mean field.comment in the oops report? | |
| [18:22] <rick_h> bdmurray: no, that's under 50k characters | |
| [18:23] <rick_h> bdmurray: must be in an attachment or something I guess from apport | |
| [18:23] <rick_h> bdmurray: I can't see it from the oops | |
| [18:25] <bdmurray> rick_h: so if one of the attachments is > 50000 characters this would cause an oops? | |
| [18:26] <rick_h> bdmurray: looking, I don't think so. It's only on the description field. I'm not 100% sure how apport fills in the value | |
| [18:26] <rick_h> deryck: ping, know how apport gets lp the descriptoin field in a bug report? | |
| [18:27] <rick_h> deryck: in this oops I don't see any description value, but guess it submits an attachment perhaps? https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=784b24ada04f53ab155d80242075ed70 | |
| [18:27] <deryck> rick_h, no, actually I don't know. I would have thought bdmurray did. ;) hi bdmurray :) | |
| [18:27] <rick_h> hah! | |
| [18:27] <bdmurray> hey deryck | |
| [18:28] <deryck> let me look at the OOPS and see what's up. The issue is bdmurray can't update a bug report? | |
| [18:28] <deryck> oh, oops on filebug. | |
| [18:28] <bdmurray> deryck: I keep getting an oops trying to submit one via apport | |
| [18:28] <rick_h> it's filing a bug from apport right bdmurray ? | |
| [18:28] <bdmurray> rick_h: right | |
| [18:28] <rick_h> right, triggering an sql condition where the description is too long, but I don't see the description set in the oops | |
| [18:29] * deryck is looking into it.... | |
| [18:33] <deryck> so sane_description is meant to block an empty string and a too long description. | |
| [18:34] <rick_h> ah, it could be empty/missing not long...doh | |
| [18:34] <bdmurray> and the description we are referring to here is a combination of comment in the oops report and my attachments right? | |
| [18:35] <deryck> I think it's just the comment. | |
| [18:36] <deryck> I don't see anything to indicate what's going wrong here. Looks like you filled out the form and hit submit and boom. | |
| [18:36] <deryck> bdmurray, this happens consistently? Even now, you get the same error? | |
| [18:36] <bdmurray> if you look at an apport bug, bug 956524, you'll see information that is included by apport and doesn't appear in my comment | |
| [18:36] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 956524 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "The release notes link on the first screen of the installer do not open the release notes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956524 | |
| [18:37] <bdmurray> notice the lines ProblemType ... UpgradeStatus | |
| [18:38] <deryck> ah hmmm | |
| [18:38] <deryck> bdmurray, did you fill out anything in the form when you went to submit it? | |
| [18:38] <deryck> and yeah, trying the link, it doesn't fill out the title as apport filed bugs normally do. | |
| [18:39] <bdmurray> deryck: the information in field.comment and field.title I put in | |
| [18:39] <bdmurray> deryck: apport only prefills the title for crashes or package install failures | |
| [18:39] <deryck> ah ok | |
| [18:41] <deryck> I'm honestly not sure what's wrong. If I'm reading the constraint correctly, it's just a simple "is it an empty string or too long" check. And what bdmurray has filed in meets that check.... | |
| [18:41] <deryck> though clearly createBug is hitting that error. | |
| [18:41] <deryck> I don't see how what apport does or doesn't do would affect this constraint | |
| [18:42] <bdmurray> I wouldn't be surprised if the information apport was putting in was more than 50k | |
| [18:42] <bdmurray> what happens to the data that apport sends? | |
| [18:43] <deryck> ah | |
| [18:43] <deryck> right, that's it probably. and it's not reflected in the OOPS. | |
| [18:44] <deryck> bdmurray, so I think we need a bug against apport and lp that apport shouldn't try to append more characters to the description than the description + apport < 50k chars. | |
| [18:45] <deryck> bdmurray, and I think the data goes to the librarian, and is unpacked via the token in the url. | |
| [18:46] <bdmurray> deryck: is this constraint new or changed? and do you have an idea of how many times this has happened? | |
| [18:46] <deryck> bdmurray, I don't know how often we hit this, and I don't think it's new or changed. | |
| [18:48] <bdmurray> deryck: okay, thanks | |
| [18:49] <deryck> bdmurray, that OOPs says past week count was 13. | |
| [18:50] <bdmurray> deryck: oh, I see that now - thats kind of neat | |
| [18:51] <deryck> I forgot about it a lot myself :) | |
| [18:59] <bdmurray> deryck: could you look at bug 957326 and add to it? | |
| [18:59] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 957326 in apport (Ubuntu) "apport should ensure description is less than 50k characters" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/957326 | |
| [19:00] <deryck> bdmurray, sure. looking now... | |
| [19:01] <deryck> bdmurray, I don't think I need to add anything. that seems perfect. | |
| === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away | |
| === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm | |
| [20:59] <m4n1sh> jelmer: ping | |
| === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away | |
| === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm | |
| [21:35] <jelmer> m4n1sh: pong | |