| [08:40] <danwee> hello everybody, need help as usual for juju | |
| [08:42] <danwee> i copy pasted the error i m getting if anyone be kind to check it out : http://paste.ubuntu.com/844334/ | |
| [11:09] <danwee> anybody can help with juju ? | |
| [11:11] <koolhead11> danwee: try mailing list. As not every developer is present every time, because of the timezone constrain | |
| [11:34] <danwee> mmm ok | |
| [14:19] <jamespage> anyone having problems using the local provider with juju from ppa on precise today? | |
| [14:19] <jamespage> can't seem to get more that one lxc instance started :-( | |
| [14:21] <koolhead11> jamespage: the juju path migh have log about the services you wanted juju to execute. the container log might help :) | |
| [14:23] <jamespage> hmm; well container.log does not contain anything useful | |
| [14:23] <jamespage> I can see from the unit logs that the first lxc instance is fine; | |
| [14:23] <jamespage> I then: juju add-unit | |
| [14:24] <jamespage> the second instance never manages to connect to zookeeper | |
| [14:24] <jamespage> the first instance drops its connections | |
| [14:24] <jamespage> and I can't access either the first or second instance :-( | |
| [14:34] <jamespage> I think the second lxc instance networking trounces the first - I get DUP pings back | |
| [14:41] <jamespage> hmm - both instances have the same mac address - that sounds bad... | |
| [14:49] <jamespage> looks like the template configuration gets a hwaddr which then propagates elsewhere | |
| [15:03] <jamespage> ah - I see - lxc-clone does not scrub the hwaddr | |
| [15:03] <jamespage> oooppps | |
| [15:10] <danwee> bitte helfen sie mie mit juju | |
| [15:13] <danwee> help needed with juju | |
| [15:19] <jamespage> danwee, what help do you need? | |
| [15:30] <danwee> jamespage, when i try to connect juju to a machine i get this error http://paste.ubuntu.com/844334/ | |
| [15:30] <danwee> juju installed on orchestra server | |
| [15:30] <jamespage> danwee, OK - so what command did you run previous to that one? | |
| [15:30] <jamespage> juju bootstrap maybe? | |
| [15:30] <danwee> juju bootstrap | |
| [15:31] <danwee> and it finished successfuly | |
| [15:32] <danwee> any ideas | |
| [15:38] <hazmat> jamespage, oops indeed | |
| [15:39] <jamespage> hazmat, bug 934256 raised | |
| [15:39] <_mup_> Bug #934256: lxc-clone should replace/change hwaddr when cloning containers <amd64> <apport-bug> <precise> <lxc (Ubuntu):New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/934256 > | |
| [15:40] <jamespage> danwee, OK - so that just means it initiate the process - not that it completed | |
| [15:40] <jamespage> can you see that the remote host being used at the bootstrap node is running? | |
| [15:42] <danwee> yes its running, i net booted it with cobbler and aquired by juju | |
| [15:43] <danwee> it can see the node , but you can see on the log that the server itself is refusing the connection to the client | |
| [15:44] <danwee> my guess is that juju is the client , and the server refusing the connection juju trying to make | |
| [15:45] <danwee> why , i dont know | |
| [15:47] <jamespage> danwee, so the juju client is trying to connect to "testata" on port 2181 | |
| [15:48] <jamespage> thats the bootstrap node | |
| [15:48] <jamespage> can you see if that is up and running? | |
| [16:31] <danwee> jamespage, i think juju client trying to connect to the orchestra server on port 53402, but is failing , i think that after the juju command , the server ssh to the machine and succeeds but when juju tried to make a connection to this machine using the local port 53402 on the server inorder to connect to the remote port , the server refuses the connection from juju | |
| [16:53] <jamespage> danwee, it would indicate that zookeeper is not running on the boostrap node | |
| [16:54] <jamespage> rather than the node not running at all | |
| [16:54] <jamespage> weird | |
| [16:54] <jamespage> can you ssh to testata and take a look | |
| [16:55] <danwee> take a look at ? | |
| [16:56] <danwee> i got to go, you take care and thanks for help | |
| [16:56] <danwee> we ll be in touch | |
| [17:00] <jamespage> bye :-) | |
| [17:23] <_mup_> Bug #934350 was filed: Upgrade charm should work from any state <juju:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/934350 > | |
| [19:30] <danwee> hello, need help in juju | |
| [19:58] <SpamapS> danwee: what can we do for you? | |
| [20:00] <danwee> SpamapS, tell me what you think http://paste.ubuntu.com/844334/ | |
| [20:26] <danwee> SpamapS, any ideas ? | |
| [20:41] <SpamapS> danwee: sorry I'm on phone calls | |
| [20:43] <danwee> SpamapS, guess no help is coming | |
| [22:37] <hazmat> SpamapS, do you have manual tests in any of the charms extant? | |
| [22:38] <hazmat> SpamapS, nevermind i see some | |