| [02:48] <MxxC> hggdh: am i wrong in understanding that triage is to get all the relevant information so that dev/package maintainers can quicker find the problem? | |
| [02:49] <xaitec> how do i help in doing the triage? | |
| [02:51] <MxxC> hggdh: i'm not in front of that computer right now, but i just looked up at the changelog of b43-fwcutter and that package was updated on 2011-12-08. i submitted my bug on 2011-12-30 and at that point my install was fully up to date | |
| [02:52] <MxxC> so b43-fwcutter version is 1:015-9 | |
| [02:56] <MxxC> i'm sorry, i mean 1:014-9 | |
| [03:20] <trinikrono> MxxC, whats the bug can i have a look | |
| [03:25] <MxxC> trinikrono: 909996 | |
| [03:26] <trinikrono> bug 909996 | |
| [03:26] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 909996 in b43-fwcutter (Ubuntu) "firmware-b43legacy-installer errors "17: missing" (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/909996 | |
| [03:28] <MxxC> yes, that's the one | |
| [03:29] <trinikrono> well the first thing i see is no apport info | |
| [03:30] <trinikrono> so you should run is : apport-collect 909996 in a terminal | |
| [03:31] <trinikrono> and let attach the files the bug report | |
| [03:33] <trinikrono> MxxC, did you get that | |
| [03:34] <MxxC> ok,i'll have to do it when i get home in front of that laptop | |
| [03:35] <MxxC> i'm remote right now | |
| [03:35] <trinikrono> qkie good luck | |
| [03:36] <MxxC> thank you for the help | |
| [04:09] <benonsoftware> Hello | |
| [04:10] <trinikrono> bug triage central how may i direct your call | |
| [04:10] <benonsoftware> Does someone need to know any programming to help triage bugs? | |
| [04:11] <trinikrono> just read the triage guide first | |
| [04:11] <trinikrono> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage/ | |
| [04:11] <benonsoftware> Ok | |
| [04:11] <trinikrono> and ask lots of questions | |
| [04:11] <benonsoftware> Sure :P | |
| [04:13] <Mxx> why is sky blue? :p | |
| [04:15] <trinikrono> because of debian :D | |
| [04:15] <benonsoftware> What is Ubuntu? :P | |
| [04:25] <astraljava> benonsoftware: http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Ubuntu | |
| [04:26] <benonsoftware> :P | |
| [04:58] <trinikrono> guys is there a master bug with ubiquity crashing when trying to copy resolv.conf i found a few so far and was wondering it there is a master bug for this | |
| [10:27] <s9iper1> who deals with network manader | |
| [10:27] <s9iper1> \manager | |
| [10:27] <s9iper1> ? | |
| [10:28] <s9iper1> hggdh:who deals with network manager | |
| [10:28] <s9iper1> ? | |
| === s9iper1 is now known as bil21al | |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | |
| === meetingology` is now known as meetingology | |
| === bigbash is now known as zz_bigbash | |
| [16:07] <dlentz> anyone using precise that can confirm this? bug 923068 | |
| [16:07] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 923068 in wine1.3 (Ubuntu) "Installing wine, package manager wants to remove libvisual-0.4-plugins (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/923068 | |
| [16:14] <astraljava> dlentz: wine is not installable for me at the moment | |
| [16:14] <astraljava> dlentz: http://paste.ubuntu.com/820197/ | |
| [16:16] <dlentz> i see, if you try to install wine1.3, i guess it's the same? | |
| [16:17] <astraljava> A little more elaborate, but yeah. http://paste.ubuntu.com/820200/ | |
| [16:21] <Ampelbein> astraljava, dlentz: for amd64 and wine you have to enable multiarch and explicitly install wine1.3:i386 | |
| [16:22] <dlentz> Ampelbein, installing wine1.3 works for me though | |
| [16:22] <dlentz> it automatically pulls ia32-libs | |
| [16:23] <Ampelbein> dlentz: ia32-libs is a transitional package now, for ia32-libs-multiarch, which isn't installable | |
| [16:23] <dlentz> ah | |
| [16:23] <dlentz> are you running precise? | |
| [16:24] <Ampelbein> Of course. | |
| [16:24] <dlentz> can you have the two packages in that bug installed at the same time? | |
| [16:24] <dlentz> wine1.3 and libvisual-0.4 | |
| [16:26] <Ampelbein> dlentz: On amd64, wine1.3 can't be installed currently. That's bug 889778 | |
| [16:26] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 889778 in wine1.3 (Ubuntu) "Wine needs multiarch support (affects: 9) (heat: 41)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/889778 | |
| [16:27] <Ampelbein> Or to be more correct, there is no native amd64 build for wine1.3 anymore | |
| [16:27] <dlentz> i don't think that the user in the bug report i linked to is using 64-bit | |
| [16:27] <dlentz> not sure though | |
| [16:28] <astraljava> Ampelbein: Right, ok, thanks. With that it is installable, but then it does _not_ want to remove libvisual-0.4-plugins. | |
| [16:28] <Ampelbein> I don't have a i386 chroot/vm to test that. | |
| [16:28] <astraljava> So, dlentz, I can _not_ confirm that. | |
| [16:28] <astraljava> Then again, it wouldn't, I suppose. Different archs. | |
| [16:28] <dlentz> ok, thanks folks, hopefully someone with 32-bit can confirm | |
| [16:28] * astraljava facepalms | |
| [16:29] * dlentz consoles astraljava | |
| [16:29] <astraljava> Hehe, thanks. :) | |
| [16:29] <Ampelbein> dlentz: I suggest asking for the complete command and output from the reporter. The report is really vague ("package manager wants to remove" - which package manager). | |
| [16:29] <astraljava> dlentz: I can create an i386 schroot pretty quickly, if you like. | |
| [16:37] <dlentz> astraljava, if it is reproducible, i'm sure someone else will run into it sooner than later | |
| [16:38] <dlentz> thanks again | |
| [16:39] <astraljava> No probs. | |
| === udienz__ is now known as udienz | |
| [18:55] <hggdh> MxxC: indeed, triage is getting all relevant data in the bug | |
| [18:56] <hggdh> MxxC: this is why I asked you if you had tried the link I gave | |
| [19:04] <TiMiDo> Hey good Morning, | |
| === JackyAlcine_ is now known as JackyAlcine | |
| [19:51] <Mxx> hggdh: yes, i tried it when i originally tried to resolve this problem. i don't remember the specific error but apparently it didn't work either.. | |
| [19:56] <trinikrono> hggdh: do you know about a resolv.conf issue in ubuquity i found a lot of dupes of the bug no master as yet | |
| [19:56] <trinikrono> like bug 922907 | |
| [19:56] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 922907 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Installer crashed towards the end... Ubuntu 12.04 alpha nightly (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/922907 | |
| [19:57] <trinikrono> i want a master to mark the dupes too | |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | |
| [20:01] <penguin42> trinikrono: Why don't you just dupe them all to the lowest number one you can find | |
| [20:03] <trinikrono> hey penguin42 | |
| [20:03] <trinikrono> i think the lowest is bug 922794 | |
| [20:03] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 922794 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "install step broken during network configuration (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/922794 | |
| [20:03] <trinikrono> they are all apport bugs so i think ill just dupe the rest | |
| [20:04] <trinikrono> can you set the main one to triaged ? | |
| [20:06] <penguin42> trinikrono: Ah, bug 922640 seems to be the master | |
| [20:06] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 922640 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Precise Pangolin Installer crashed with: Error: `/etc/resolv.conf` and `/target/etc/resolv.conf` are the same file (affects: 17) (dups: 18) (heat: 146)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/922640 | |
| [20:10] <trinikrono> i did not see it since it was fix released :D | |
| [20:11] <trinikrono> okie thanks penguin42 i am going to mark the rest as dupes | |
| [20:11] <trinikrono> seems they used a older iso | |
| [20:11] <trinikrono> the lastest iso should have the fix in it right | |
| [20:12] <penguin42> trinikrono: Not sure the exacty timings; if the current one doesn't I guess the next one should | |
| [20:16] <trinikrono> i only was able to mark the dupes on 3 of them since someone started to mark them dupes aswell | |
| [20:18] <metasansana> bugs | |
| [20:30] <jibel> trinikrono, ubiquity 2.9.12 has the fix, and 2.9.13 is in the latest image. | |
| [20:33] <trinikrono> yes i saw that | |
| [20:33] <trinikrono> i was reading the changelog | |
| [20:33] <trinikrono> if i read the changelog last night i would marked a few more lol | |
| [20:52] <TiMiDo> lol | |
| [20:52] <TiMiDo> ;P | |
| [20:56] <dlentz> is anyone else frustrated by launchpad timeouts? | |
| [20:57] <jtaylor> I can live with the timeouts but that the browser back button does not work anymore really sucks ._. | |
| [21:02] <dlentz> that too, it mostly doesn't work for me | |