| [04:52] <lifeless> jelmer: bug 755241 still needs a little polish I think | |
| [04:52] <_mup_> Bug #755241: subunit-filter ability to change fail to xfail based on external list <subunit:In Progress by jelmer> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/755241 > | |
| [08:27] <rick_h__> StevenK: lp:~rharding/launchpad/use-convoy is my branch with some small changes | |
| === wgrant is now known as Guest57052 | |
| [08:32] <StevenK> wgrant_: loloptus | |
| [08:32] <wgrant_> Nah | |
| [08:33] <wgrant_> I think my terrible ARM server at home has died this time. | |
| [08:38] <wgrant_> gary_poster: sudo mount -t overlayfs -o upperdir=foo,lowerdir=bar none baz | |
| [08:39] <StevenK> overlayfs *and* LXC? What Could Possibly Go Wrong | |
| [08:39] <lifeless> wgrant_: AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE | |
| [08:45] <wgrant_> well, aufs is dead, so we need to use overlayfs instead on precise | |
| [08:53] <lifeless> I believe it got put back into precise :) | |
| [08:53] <lifeless> anyhoo | |
| [08:53] <lifeless> we can all upgrade to precise easily enough :) | |
| [08:54] <wgrant_> lifeless: Colin said otherwise | |
| [08:54] <wgrant_> And it works in Oneiric | |
| [08:54] <wgrant_> And we can use aufs on old series. | |
| [08:54] <lifeless> ah good, ok | |
| [08:54] <lifeless> wgrant_: hmm, I saw chatter go by in #ubuntu-kernel couple days back | |
| [08:59] <wgrant_> It was killed and revived back in Lucid, but AFAIK it's really gone now. | |
| [09:05] <lifeless> wgrant_: '06:11 #ubuntu-kernel: < apw> tgardner, that is our desire, we are starting to see some problems, which i want to look at at rally, seems pbuilder won't work for instance which is a bit of a problem | |
| [09:05] <lifeless> ' | |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | |
| === danilo_ is now known as danilos | |
| [10:08] <jtv> wgrant_: grar, nasty traceback. Looks very much as if the pending change was a holdover from either a previous scan cycle or a different builder whose work got interleaved with the failing one. | |
| [10:09] <wgrant_> jtv: Hm. It's possible that concordia was doing stuff, but I don't think so. The full log is at carob:/srv/launchpad.net-logs/staging/buildmaster/buildd-manager.log or so | |
| [10:11] <jtv> Or wait… builder.Build..? | |
| [10:11] <jtv> Sorry: builder.updateBuild | |
| [10:12] <jtv> Calls the build behavior's updateBuild. | |
| [10:12] <wgrant_> Yes, that's where the problem is most likely to be. | |
| [10:16] <jtv> wgrant_: yup, one of the status handlers again, I suspect. | |
| [10:18] <StevenK> Melbourne | |
| [10:23] <jtv> wgrant_: Builder.failBuilder | |
| [10:24] <jtv> wgrant_: in _handleStatus_BUILDERFAIL | |
| [10:25] <jtv> lp.buildmaster.model.packagebuild.PackageBuildDerived._handleStatus_BUILDERFAIL needs a read/write database policy. | |
| [10:26] <wgrant_> Aha | |
| [10:26] <wgrant_> But wasn't this PACKAGEFAIL? | |
| [10:28] <jtv> wgrant_: dunno — haven't looked at the log yet. The traceback doesn't say. | |
| [10:28] <wgrant_> Look at the first line of the paste. | |
| [10:28] <wgrant_> 2012-01-11 08:41:19+0000 [QueryProtocol,client] Templates generation job blah-5194310 for lp://staging/checkbox finished with status PACKAGEFAIL. | |
| [10:29] <jtv> Ah. Any chance that that might be exactly because the status update was preempted by this failure? | |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | |
| [13:04] <rick_h__> StevenK: https://pastebin.canonical.com/57967/ | |
| === wgrant_ is now known as Guest21768 | |
| [13:11] <mhall119> who can I talk to about https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/188564 ? | |
| [13:12] <_mup_> Bug #188564: Build also packages for Debian in PPA's <feature> <lp-soyuz> <ppa> <soyuz-core> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/188564 > | |
| [13:13] <deryck> mhall119, what sort of talking to are you looking for? | |
| [13:13] <deryck> uncle_ian, lp:~deryck/launchpad/remove-unused-getContentArea | |
| [13:14] <mhall119> deryck: I'd like to get an update on how far the conversation has gone about giving resources to this, and if any decisions have been made | |
| [13:15] <deryck> mhall119, so see mrevell or flacoste | |
| [13:16] <mhall119> deryck: thanks | |
| [13:17] <deryck> mhall119, np! | |
| [13:18] <nigelb> So, I was thinking of doing a hacking on LP sesion at the next ubuntu developer week, can anyone co-host the session with me? :) | |
| [13:20] * mhall119 hides | |
| [13:21] <lifeless> nigelb: depending on the timing, sure | |
| [13:21] <nigelb> \o/ | |
| [13:23] <nigelb> lifeless: Pick one that works for you from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek/Timetable. I'll adjust my schedule around :) | |
| [13:26] <lifeless> 2100UTC on tuesday is probably good | |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | |
| [13:30] <nigelb> 0230, not bad. | |
| [13:30] <nigelb> I'll book that | |
| [13:31] <nigelb> I'm guessing we need at least 1 hour? | |
| [13:34] <lifeless> depends on what you want to show folk | |
| [13:34] <lifeless> nigelb: 0230 isn't bad?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??! | |
| [13:34] <nigelb> I can stay awake that long :) | |
| [13:35] <nigelb> 0400 on the other hand... | |
| === wgrant is now known as Guest18217 | |
| [13:35] <nigelb> Would setting up local instance of launchpad and hcaking on a small bug be too hard? | |
| [13:35] <lifeless> well, we can set up a VM the ycan download | |
| [13:36] <StevenK> Depends. You may have to fix it to document how long it takes. | |
| [13:36] <lifeless> it would take an hour to bootstrap a dev environment from scratch | |
| [13:36] <nigelb> boo | |
| [13:37] <nigelb> how about we announce that we expect people to already have their environments setup? (yeah, that's hard as well) | |
| [13:37] <lifeless> yeah | |
| [13:37] <lifeless> we should | |
| [13:37] <lifeless> but we should also make that easay | |
| [13:38] <nigelb> is it harder than it used to be? | |
| [13:38] <lifeless> no harder, no | |
| [13:38] <nigelb> I only had trouble with hanving enough bandwidth to download everything rf wanted to download ;) | |
| [13:44] <lifeless> jml: you are confusing me. And I want to talk to you about ui result objects. Can has voice? | |
| [13:47] <jml> lifeless: not *right* now. in 1hr15 though. | |
| [13:49] <mhall119> hey lifeless , would you be able to give me any insights into how far the discussions went on https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/188564 ? | |
| [13:49] <_mup_> Bug #188564: Build also packages for Debian in PPA's <feature> <lp-soyuz> <ppa> <soyuz-core> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/188564 > | |
| [13:50] <lifeless> mhall119: I don't think they have gone anywhere | |
| [13:50] <lifeless> jml: ping me. | |
| [13:50] <mhall119> lifeless: it sounds like it's not technically difficult, just resource expensive, am I reading that right? | |
| [13:52] <lifeless> there are technical things too, like having a debian archive to build against and publishing the results properly | |
| [15:30] * cjwatson wonders why lp-remove-package.py bothers taking a lock | |
| [15:30] <cjwatson> Oh well, I guess it'll be moot once that's moved to the API ... | |
| [16:10] <jam> I just got some failures trying to push to bazaar.launchpad.net: "ConnectionReset reading response for 'BzrDir.open_2.1', retrying | |
| [16:10] <jam> ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host" | |
| [16:10] <jam> It is working right now, though. But I'm wondering if we are having capacity issues | |
| [16:18] <wgrant> rvba: Does the PPA notifications thing really delete the PCJ? | |
| [16:27] <StevenK> rick_h__: activateConstrainBugExpiration mochi death is live on qas. | |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | |
| [17:52] <lifeless> jml: yo | |
| [20:58] <mwhudson> "Delete MochiKit.js since it's no longer used" \o/ | |
| [21:04] <StevenK> Oh yes | |
| [21:04] <StevenK> We can't kill YUI 2 yet, sadly. | |
| [21:05] <mwhudson> is that going to happen this week? | |
| [21:05] <StevenK> Unlikely. The YUI 3 Calendar widget didn't appear until 3.4, and we're still on 3.3. | |
| [21:06] <mwhudson> ah right | |
| [21:06] <StevenK> And switching to 3.4 using our current system is *painful* since they reorganised the entire bloody tree. | |
| [21:06] <mwhudson> argl | |
| [21:06] <mwhudson> so not difficult, but massively tedious and has to be done in one bit hit? | |
| [21:06] <mwhudson> *big | |
| [21:07] <StevenK> We're looking at being clever and using a combo loader. | |
| [21:07] <mwhudson> ah, that can translate old to new locations? | |
| [21:08] <StevenK> So the class names didn't change, just their locations. This is the YUI combo loader, just not Yahoo's own. | |
| [21:08] <mwhudson> right | |
| [21:09] <StevenK> And let's face it. Our JS is a right mess. | |
| [21:10] <StevenK> We combine all of our JS files in a particular order, and then add YUI onto the end and then minify the entire lot. | |
| [21:10] <StevenK> It is utterly disgusting. | |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | |
| [22:28] <timrc> not sure you can see this, https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloudberry because it's private but the results which should be showing all bugs for this project are not matching up with the statistics in the sidebar... for example there are 3 results returned, but the side bar says there are 9 open bugs... | |
| [22:29] <timrc> am I missing something? | |
| [22:30] <timrc> clicking on the "9 open bugs" link takes me https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloudberry/+bugs which is still displaying only 3 bugs | |
| [22:31] <mwhudson> timrc: i think that's sort of expected, but i can't remember why | |
| [22:32] <mwhudson> timrc: ah, found the mail | |
| [22:33] <mwhudson> timrc: it's because you probably have multiple paths to visibility on those bugs | |
| [22:33] <mwhudson> i.e. directly subscribed and also in a team that is subscribed | |
| [22:34] <mwhudson> timrc: https://lists.launchpad.net/launchpad-dev/msg06914.html | |