| [00:24] <quentusrex> Wow, figuring out dput and the launchpad requirements to upload my package is really difficult... | |
| [00:27] <awmcclain> If I'm setting up some launchpad branches from which to build packages using autoppa, what's the best way to do that? Create a new project and branch for each new release I want to do? Import the svn to a new project and create branches for each release? | |
| === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | |
| [06:35] <Hobbsee> PriceChild: you'll have to file a launchpad question. That functionality (to remove an email address from a team) got removed a while ago. | |
| [06:35] <Hobbsee> an admin will need to fix that | |
| [06:36] <Hobbsee> (to get it removed from ~u-i-cloaks | |
| [06:36] <Hobbsee> ) | |
| === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | |
| === gord_ is now known as gord | |
| [12:57] <laterix> I get email everytime someone assigns/comments a bug in the project that I've been participating. How can I disable this feature? Can't find it anywhere | |
| === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | |
| [15:19] <PriceChild> Thanks Hobbsee. | |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | |
| [17:37] <bpierre> hi | |
| [17:37] <bpierre> I just pushed a branch to launchpad (without errors), but now I get these kind of errors: Unknown repository format: 'Bazaar RepositoryFormatKnitPack6 (bzr 1.9) | |
| [17:38] <bpierre> I pushed with the following command: push lp:~benoit.pierre/bzr/shelve_relpath_files --use-existing-dir | |
| [17:38] <bpierre> and the local branch does use the 1.9 format | |
| [17:39] <beuno> bpierre, Launchpad hasn't been upgraded to bzr 1.9 yet, so it doesn't recognize the format | |
| [17:39] <bpierre> but the push worked! | |
| [17:39] <beuno> yes, that's how smart bzr is ;) | |
| [17:39] <bpierre> what can I do? delete the branch and recreate it? | |
| [17:39] <beuno> yeah, only in an older format | |
| [17:39] <beuno> 1.6 or pack-0.92 | |
| [17:40] <beuno> sorry for the hassle, the upgrade to 1.9 is scheduled, but there where a few issues that needed solving before deploying | |
| [17:40] <beuno> you can always peak and see what version of bzr we're using in: https://code.launchpad.net/ | |
| [17:41] <bpierre> no problem, but since my local branch is in 1.9, how can I do that? init lp:~benoit.pierre/bzr/shelve_relpath_files --format 1.6 | |
| [17:41] <bpierre> ? | |
| [17:41] <bpierre> because launchpad automatically created a stacked branch | |
| [17:41] <bpierre> *create | |
| [17:41] <beuno> I think bzr upgrade --1.6 on your branch may downgrade it | |
| [17:47] <bpierre> ok, it worked, thanks beuno | |
| [17:48] <beuno> bpierre, welcome | |
| [18:36] <javaJake> How would I create a child branch in Launchpad? | |
| [18:45] <rockstar> javaJake, what do you mean child branch? | |
| [18:46] <javaJake> rockstar: as I see it, when you checkout/update a branch, it does the same on its children. However, revisions are specific to each branch. | |
| [18:47] <javaJake> rockstar: basically, instead of a huge list of branches, we'd like to organize it. | |
| [18:47] <javaJake> (We're splitting up the code into multiple self-contained parts.) | |
| [18:47] <rockstar> javaJake, I'm still not sure what you mean by "children." Do you mean branches of a branch? | |
| [18:48] <javaJake> rockstar: right, so, for instance: | |
| [18:48] <rockstar> Like, a branch of trunk? | |
| [18:48] <javaJake> rockstar: perhaps :) | |
| [18:48] <javaJake> rockstar: say we have program A, and library B and C. | |
| [18:49] <javaJake> trunk/ contains global stuff (docs, etc.) | |
| [18:49] <javaJake> trunk/programA contains code for programA | |
| [18:49] <javaJake> trunk/libraryA and trunk/libraryB contains imported code plus some customizations | |
| [18:50] <rockstar> javaJake, so programA, libraryA, etc. is all part of one branch? | |
| [18:50] <rockstar> The trunk branch? | |
| [18:50] <javaJake> rockstar: right | |
| [18:50] <javaJake> rockstar: but I don't want a change in libraryB to be an unrelated, unnecessary revision for programA and libraryC | |
| [18:51] <rockstar> javaJake, it's all in the same branch. | |
| [18:51] <javaJake> rockstar: sure, but it's more organized, and each child branch can be accessed on their own | |
| [18:51] <javaJake> rockstar: why, is there a better way? | |
| [18:52] <javaJake> I'm open to ideas :) | |
| [18:52] <rockstar> javaJake, no, bzr doesn't support what you're calling "child branches" | |
| [18:53] <javaJake> OK | |
| [18:53] <javaJake> Any alternative? | |
| [18:54] <javaJake> Besides scripting the automatic branch pull's | |
| [18:54] <javaJake> ;) | |
| [18:54] <rockstar> javaJake, nope. The Launchpad team works like that. We have a script that updates all our bzr branches of dependencies. | |
| [18:55] <javaJake> rockstar: "dependencies" in a Launchpad team? | |
| [18:55] <bpierre> how do you handle going back to an earlier revision? do save the revision needed for each dependency? | |
| [18:57] <rockstar> javaJake, dependencies for the project. | |
| [18:57] <rockstar> bpierre, they are separate branches. | |
| [18:58] <javaJake> rockstar: OK. Is there any documentation on that? | |
| [18:58] <bpierre> yeah, but the point of 'child branches', or what bazaar developers call nested-trees, is also to be able to track the revision of each child tree | |
| [18:58] <rockstar> bpierre, but nested trees are not yet supported. | |
| [18:59] <rockstar> So, while that sounds like a good plan, there is no support for any such feature. | |
| [18:59] <bpierre> yeah, and separate branches means no tracking of their revisions | |
| [18:59] <bpierre> so if want to build an earlier version of the master branch, how do you know which revision you should get for each child branch? | |
| [19:00] <bpierre> *if you | |
| [19:00] <rockstar> bpierre, you'd have to keep some sort of record for that. | |
| [19:00] <bpierre> yeah, how do you (the launchpad team) handle that? | |
| [19:00] <bpierre> I'm just curious | |
| [19:01] <bpierre> because I too am missing the fact that nested trees are not supported | |
| [19:01] <bpierre> do you use config-manager? | |
| [19:03] <rockstar> bpierre, we never have to go back like that. | |
| [19:04] <bpierre> ok | |
| [19:25] <javaJake> rockstar: alright, looks like I'll have to get creative | |
| [20:33] <j^> hi, on launchpad i choose a name long ago | |
| [20:33] <j^> now if i try to change my details, launchpad gives me an error that my name would not be valid | |
| [20:33] <j^> i do not intend to change my name | |
| [21:08] <beuno> j^, you should file a question requesting to get that fixed: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | |
| [21:36] <bpierre> beuno: recreating the branch means I can now interact with it with bzr, but launchpad still tells me it's not a branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~benoit.pierre/bzr/shelve_relpath_files | |
| [21:39] <beuno> bpierre, you just deleted it and re-pushed with 1.6 format? | |
| [21:39] <bpierre> well, a while ago yes | |
| [21:40] <beuno> ugh | |
| [21:40] <bpierre> and I was waiting for launchpad to rescan it | |
| [21:40] <beuno> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bzrlib/repository.py", line 1651, in iter_reverse_revision_history | |
| [21:40] <beuno> parents = graph.get_parent_map([next_id])[next_id] | |
| [21:40] <beuno> KeyError: 'pqm@pqm.ubuntu.com-20081129023747-31a9su43tijw8p3r' | |
| [21:40] <bpierre> thinking the message would disapear | |
| [21:42] <beuno> bpierre, looks like bug 259275 | |
| [21:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 259275 in bzr "pushing a non-stacking format into a non-repo bzrdir with a default stacking policy creates broken branch" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/259275 | |
| [21:42] <beuno> maybe not | |
| [21:42] <beuno> what version of bzr are you using? | |
| [21:43] <bpierre> mmm, the thing is it works fine as far as bzr is concerned | |
| [21:43] <bpierre> 1.11dev | |
| [21:43] <beuno> bpierre, could you file a bug in: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bazaar-launchpad | |
| [21:44] <bpierre> sure | |
| [21:45] <beuno> bpierre, also, check to see what output you get with: bzr log lp:~benoit.pierre/bzr/shelve_relpath_files | |
| [21:45] <beuno> you should get the same traceback as me | |
| [21:45] <beuno> that'll be useful for figuring out the bug :) | |
| [21:45] <bpierre> nope | |
| [21:45] <bpierre> it works | |
| [21:45] <bpierre> info/pull/missing | |
| [21:45] <beuno> ah | |
| [21:46] <bpierre> work too | |
| [21:46] <beuno> uhm | |
| [21:46] <beuno> try: bzr log http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~benoit.pierre/bzr/shelve_relpath_files | |
| [21:46] <beuno> that should blow up | |
| [21:46] <bpierre> Repository branch (format: unnamed) | |
| [21:46] <beuno> and, if it does, then I kinda know where it's breaking | |
| [21:46] <bpierre> when I use info | |
| [21:46] <bpierre> is that normal? | |
| [21:47] <beuno> yeah, getting info through bzr+ssh always says unknown. If you get it through http it will tell you the truth :) | |
| [21:47] <bpierre> ok, so it's the location format that triggers the problem | |
| [21:47] <bpierre> using bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ebenoit.pierre/bzr/shelve_relpath_files/ works | |
| [21:48] <beuno> right, well, LP mirrors it internally | |
| [21:48] <beuno> to where you see it from http | |
| [21:48] <beuno> "the puller" | |
| [21:48] <beuno> so that's what's breaking | |
| [21:48] <beuno> wheny uo file the bug, let me know the # and I'll add that bit in | |
| [21:49] <bpierre> ok | |
| [21:49] <bpierre> btw, I get an error with https://bugs.launchpad.net/bazaar-launchpad | |
| [21:50] <beuno> ay | |
| [21:50] <beuno> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar | |
| [21:50] <beuno> I get dizzy on weekends | |
| [21:50] <bpierre> thanks :) | |
| [21:52] <bpierre> I will add 2 bugs: one about the fact that my first push created a branch with the wrong format, and the second about recreating the branch, ok? | |
| [21:53] <beuno> well, the first one is pretty clear, since you uploaded with a 1.9 format | |
| [21:53] <beuno> but sure | |
| [21:53] <beuno> Launchpad should tell you that it doesn't support that format yet | |
| [22:12] <bpierre> beuno: #303560 and #303562 | |
| [22:12] <bpierre> I hope the descriptions are clear | |
| [22:13] <quentusrex> I have an error from dput | |
| [22:13] <quentusrex> It crashed out on me. | |
| [22:14] <quentusrex> pbxbuntu-freepbx_2.5.0-1_source.changes: done. | |
| [22:14] <quentusrex> Traceback (most recent call last): | |
| [22:14] <quentusrex> File "/usr/bin/dput", line 922, in <module> | |
| [22:14] <quentusrex> main() | |
| [22:14] <quentusrex> File "/usr/bin/dput", line 871, in main | |
| [22:14] <quentusrex> files_to_upload, debug, ftp_mode, progress=progress, port=port) | |
| [22:14] <quentusrex> File "/usr/share/dput/ftp.py", line 71, in upload | |
| [22:15] <beuno> bpierre, thanks | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> ftp_connection.quit() | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/ftplib.py", line 534, in quit | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> resp = self.voidcmd('QUIT') | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/ftplib.py", line 246, in voidcmd | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> return self.voidresp() | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/ftplib.py", line 221, in voidresp | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> resp = self.getresp() | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/ftplib.py", line 207, in getresp | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> resp = self.getmultiline() | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/ftplib.py", line 193, in getmultiline | |
| [22:15] <beuno> quentusrex, please don't do that | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> line = self.getline() | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/ftplib.py", line 183, in getline | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> if not line: raise EOFError | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> EOFError | |
| [22:15] <quentusrex> beuno: ok. | |
| [22:16] <quentusrex> Any idea of the reason for the crash? | |
| [22:17] <beuno> not really, no | |
| [22:18] <quentusrex> :( | |
| [22:21] <beuno> bpierre, bugs look good enough to triage, I'll leave them as-is | |
| [22:21] <bpierre> ok | |
| [22:24] <quentusrex> bpierre: any idea what could be causing my bug? | |
| [22:24] <bpierre> nope | |
| [22:24] <quentusrex> :( | |
| [23:08] <quentusrex> Is anyone awake??? | |
| [23:15] <javaJake> Is anyone here able to help me delete a branch? | |
| [23:16] <javaJake> It got really messed up, to the point Launchpad errors out on deletion | |
| [23:16] <javaJake> I meant to ask, are there any administrators here able to help me :P | |
| [23:31] <Ursinha> hi javaJake | |
| [23:31] <javaJake> Ursinha: hey | |
| [23:31] <Ursinha> to delete a branch you should click on the red circle on the right of it | |
| [23:31] <Ursinha> can you see that? | |
| [23:32] <javaJake> Hehehehe, yes :) | |
| [23:32] <Ursinha> :) | |
| [23:32] <javaJake> Then it confirms the deletion | |
| [23:32] <Ursinha> it will delete the branch in launchpad | |
| [23:32] <javaJake> Yes, I click delete... | |
| [23:32] <javaJake> *click* | |
| [23:32] <javaJake> And I wait... | |
| [23:32] <javaJake> And it sits there for a good 15 seconds or so | |
| [23:33] * javaJake waits some more | |
| [23:33] <Ursinha> well | |
| [23:33] <wgrant> Is this on edge? | |
| [23:33] <Ursinha> it should return something | |
| [23:33] <javaJake> "Oops!" | |
| [23:33] <Ursinha> or the confirming of deletion or a | |
| [23:33] <javaJake> wgrant: no | |
| [23:33] <Ursinha> erm | |
| [23:33] <javaJake> "Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad." | |
| [23:33] <Ursinha> oops | |
| [23:33] <Ursinha> :/ | |
| [23:33] <javaJake> "(Error ID: OOPS-1064B2793)" | |
| [23:33] <ubottu> https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/1064B2793 | |
| [23:33] <javaJake> NICE! | |
| [23:33] <Ursinha> javaJake, it's a timeout | |
| [23:33] <javaJake> Ursinha: yea, I know | |
| [23:33] <javaJake> But something isn't happy behind the scenes. | |
| [23:34] <Ursinha> javaJake, how many times have you tried? | |
| [23:34] <javaJake> Quite a few. | |
| [23:34] <javaJake> :P | |
| [23:34] <javaJake> Not a whole lot, just a few ;) | |
| [23:34] <Ursinha> javaJake, not good | |
| [23:34] <Ursinha> have to see the oops | |
| [23:34] <javaJake> OK | |
| [23:35] <Ursinha> javaJake, have to wait a few minutes to the report to be available, I'll be right back in a few minutes | |
| [23:35] <javaJake> Ursinha: OK | |
| [23:36] <javaJake> Well, my partner mentioned he "commited without establishing bzr init and then used --use-existing-dir" | |
| [23:37] <javaJake> He also mentioned that he couldn't "push" because there was "no common ancestry". | |
| [23:37] <javaJake> I can get more detailed information if you need it, he's away right now. | |