|
[00:10] <fta> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2) Gecko/20081126 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Shiretoko/3.1b2 |
|
[00:12] <fta> asac, your distribution.ini says firefox even if the branding is not firefox :( |
|
[00:13] <asac> oh completely forgot about that ;) |
|
[00:14] <asac> distribution.ini.firefox distribution.ini.abrowser ... dont think we need a template |
|
[00:15] <fta> it should match the desktop, ie, firefox/abrowser/minefield/shiretoko |
|
[00:15] <fta> so a template is better |
|
[00:16] <asac> gnome-terminal consumes 600M mem |
|
[00:16] <asac> have to close it i guess |
|
[00:17] <fta> that's why i'm using xterms |
|
[00:17] <fta> strangely, ff is using 12% cpu while idle |
|
[00:17] <asac> i think X has a huge mem leak here ;) |
|
[00:18] <asac> i closed everything ... and still 1.5G in use |
|
[00:20] <asac> omg geyes_applet2 uses 100 ;) |
|
[00:20] <asac> tomboy 65 |
|
[00:20] <fta> RES ? or VIRT ? |
|
[00:21] <asac> RES |
|
[00:21] <asac> bzr-notify 25 RES |
|
[00:21] <asac> that has to go |
|
[00:21] <asac> i never installed |
|
[00:21] <asac> it |
|
[00:21] <asac> now i have to find it and purge it |
|
[00:22] <asac> ok bzr-gtk uninstalled ;) |
|
[00:22] <fta> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND |
|
[00:22] <fta> 27772 fta 20 0 556m 385m 30m S 18 19.0 3:25.03 firefox-3.1 |
|
[00:22] <fta> 10384 root 20 0 218m 172m 15m S 1 8.5 49:32.14 Xorg |
|
[00:22] <fta> 8511 fta 20 0 208m 61m 23m S 0 3.0 10:11.08 rhythmbox |
|
[00:22] <fta> 10576 fta 20 0 162m 58m 21m S 0 2.9 3:12.31 liferea-bin |
|
[00:22] <fta> 10850 fta 20 0 91476 47m 14m S 0 2.3 0:30.10 evince |
|
[00:22] <fta> 10568 fta 20 0 140m 36m 18m S 0 1.8 0:47.21 nautilus |
|
[00:23] <asac> oh ... i have two Xorg ;) |
|
[00:23] <asac> 5517 root 20 0 553m 152m 13m S 4 7.6 131:33.30 Xorg |
|
[00:23] <asac> 5877 root 20 0 553m 152m 13m S 0 7.6 0:00.00 Xorg |
|
[00:29] <asac> too bad. this ended in a reboot ;) |
|
[00:30] <fta> eheh |
|
[00:31] <asac> 13997 root 20 0 54716 2560 1952 S 0 0.1 0:00.04 NetworkManager |
|
[00:31] <asac> sry |
|
[00:31] <asac> 2560 |
|
[00:31] <asac> thats cool |
|
[00:31] <asac> i blame python apps for most bloat ;) |
|
[00:31] <asac> why does jockey-backend need 20m res? |
|
[00:31] <asac> NM doesnt even use 2.5m |
|
[00:32] <asac> fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/77255/ |
|
[00:32] <asac> thats the ordered "root" process list |
|
[00:33] <asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/77256/ |
|
[00:33] <asac> thats the user process list |
|
[00:33] <asac> (more or less virgin sys) |
|
[00:39] <fta> trackerd, bbaaaaaahh |
|
[00:41] <fta> prism is still broken, no idea why |
|
[00:42] <fta> jaunty only, intrepid is fine |
|
[00:46] <asac> fta: intrepid == same version as in jaunty, just built on intrepid is fine? |
|
[00:47] <asac> fta: maybe a maxVersion thing? |
|
[01:14] <fta> same problem after a rebuild, even with fresher sources |
|
[01:15] <fta> Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND) [nsIXPCComponents_Utils.import]" nsresult: "0x80520012 (NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://webrunner/content/webrunner.js :: <TOP_LEVEL> :: line 31" data: no] |
|
[01:15] <fta> Error: WebRunner is undefined |
|
[01:15] <fta> Source File: chrome://webrunner/content/webrunner.xul |
|
[01:15] <fta> Line: 167 |
|
[01:22] <asac> fta: xul 1.9.1? |
|
[06:37] <wiki> Is it possible to upload a hidden release to my ppa without it affecting/superseding my other releases.I want to test if my pkg is building properly on all platforms. |
|
[10:34] <james_w> asac: how do I turn an xpi in to an orig.tar.gz? |
|
[10:52] <asac> james_w: med-xpi-unpack |
|
[10:53] <asac> james_w: makes a standard structure out of it |
|
[10:53] <asac> james_w: thats in mozilla-devscripts |
|
[10:53] <directhex> clever! |
|
[10:53] <james_w> is it normal to have a get-orig-source rule? |
|
[10:54] <asac> james_w: not in our extension branches atm |
|
[10:54] <james_w> I would have thought that would be a good idea, rather than having a watch file that downloaded something that couldn't be used straight away |
|
[10:54] <asac> james_w: volans has developed a set of script that might be helpfule here |
|
[10:54] <directhex> get-orig-source is a joyous thing. except when repacking to tgz, which causes pain |
|
[10:55] <asac> james_w: well. get-orig-source doesnt help us as we have upstream in the branches |
|
[10:55] <james_w> it's separate from that in my opinion |
|
[10:55] <james_w> it's about getting the .orig.tar.gz to build against |
|
[10:55] <asac> james_w: why would you want that? |
|
[10:56] <asac> james_w: it feels like redundancy |
|
[10:56] <asac> we already have the orig in the bzr branch |
|
[10:56] <james_w> because we need an .orig.tar.gz |
|
[10:56] <asac> only problem is "how" to spot the right revision |
|
[10:56] <asac> james_w: imo bzr bd --export-upstream --export-upstream-rev=... is the right thing to do |
|
[10:57] <asac> james_w: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~volans/firefox-extensions/med-auto-scripts |
|
[10:57] <asac> thats what volans did so far |
|
[10:58] <james_w> if export-upstream is the best way to do it why don't you set up the branches like that? |
|
[10:58] <asac> james_w: what do you mean? |
|
[10:59] <james_w> why isn't the config of the branch set up to do that automatically? |
|
[10:59] <asac> james_w: how? |
|
[10:59] <james_w> though it doesn't work too well at the moment for uploading a -2 |
|
[10:59] <asac> james_w: a while back we talked about it |
|
[10:59] <james_w> with a .bzr-builddeb/default.conf |
|
[10:59] <asac> (e.g. how to find the right revision for upstream) |
|
[11:00] <asac> i thought there was no "generic" solution |
|
[11:00] <james_w> you can set the revision in there |
|
[11:00] <asac> james_w: cool |
|
[11:00] <james_w> then when you want to work on a new upstream change that, add a changelog entry, fix up anything else and commit it |
|
[11:00] <asac> james_w: and i suppose that that file gets also committed? |
|
[11:00] <james_w> it will then start building from the revision |
|
[11:00] <james_w> then I could just grab the branch and run "bzr bd" |
|
[11:01] <asac> james_w: ok. lets take a step back: |
|
[11:01] <james_w> however, as I said it is currently broken for uploading a -2 |
|
[11:01] <james_w> or -0ubuntu2 |
|
[11:01] <asac> lets assume i have a .ubuntu branch (e.g. full source packaging) ... now i merge a new .upstream into it: |
|
[11:01] <asac> cd test.ubuntu; bzr merge ../test.upstream; bzr commit -m "* new upstream release X.y.Z" |
|
[11:01] <james_w> yep, I forgot that bit |
|
[11:02] <asac> how can i know up front what revision the merge will have |
|
[11:02] <asac> ? |
|
[11:02] <asac> e.g. |
|
[11:02] <james_w> do a "vi .bzr-builddeb/default.conf" before commit |
|
[11:02] <asac> and what shall i add there? i dont know the revision the commit will be before? |
|
[11:02] <james_w> no |
|
[11:03] <asac> (its not the top level revision which i could guess afaik, its the nested version) |
|
[11:03] <james_w> you don't tell it the revision in *this* branch, you tell it the revision in the upstream branch that you are working off |
|
[11:03] <james_w> in your example it's the last revision of ../test.upstream |
|
[11:03] <asac> james_w: ok. but that requires to keep upstream ? |
|
[11:03] <james_w> no, just to know the revision id of it |
|
[11:04] <james_w> once you have that and you have merged it you can delete the upstream branch |
|
[11:04] <asac> james_w: ok so i guess bzr bd sees the branch nick and then finds the right merge revision? |
|
[11:04] <james_w> eh? |
|
[11:04] <asac> james_w: if i delete .upstream after that |
|
[11:05] <asac> how will bzr bd be able to produce a orig? |
|
[11:05] <asac> i assumed it would use --export-upstream=. --export-upstream=magic-revision |
|
[11:05] <asac> err |
|
[11:05] <asac> i assumed it would use --export-upstream=. --export-upstream-revision=magic-revision |
|
[11:05] <james_w> yep |
|
[11:06] <asac> james_w: so. from what i understand its not magic-revision i add to default.conf ... but just "upstream-revision" |
|
[11:06] <asac> how does bzr bd find the magic-revision in the .ubuntu branch ;)? |
|
[11:06] <james_w> the revision id of the tip revision of the upstream branch when you merge it |
|
[11:06] <asac> james_w: revision id != revno? |
|
[11:06] <james_w> exactly |
|
[11:07] <asac> james_w: ok that makes sense. how can i see revision id? |
|
[11:07] <james_w> revision id is a uuid which won't change when you merge |
|
[11:07] <james_w> bzr log --show-ids |
|
[11:07] <asac> nice |
|
[11:07] <james_w> talking with you has made me see that this could be improved |
|
[11:08] <asac> james_w: ok. so what exactly is needed in default.conf? |
|
[11:08] <james_w> jelmer uses this mode and keeps hitting the -2 problem |
|
[11:09] <james_w> and I think I may be able to make it work for him, make it easier for you, and still work for the other use case that is why we have these problems |
|
[11:09] <james_w> I need to think about it a bit more first though |
|
[11:09] <asac> james_w: sure |
|
[11:09] <asac> james_w: actually. we have those auto scripts i pointed you to |
|
[11:09] <james_w> http://jameswestby.net/bzr/builddeb/user_manual/export_upstream.html |
|
[11:10] <asac> james_w: those are atomic things helpful to auto sync with AMO repository |
|
[11:10] <james_w> I think "export-upstream = ." should work |
|
[11:10] <asac> james_w: ok. is there a convenience script that allows me to branch "upstream" from a .ubuntu branch? |
|
[11:10] <james_w> I reckon you should hold off from using this in anger until I have fixed it up though |
|
[11:10] <asac> that would help me to upgrade the .upstream branches |
|
[11:10] <james_w> there is code, but no script |
|
[11:11] <asac> e.g. bzr branch-upstream lp:~mozillateam/firefox-extensions/extension1.ubuntu |
|
[11:11] <asac> err |
|
[11:11] <asac> e.g. bzr branch-upstream lp:~mozillateam/firefox-extensions/extension1.ubuntu extension1.upstream |
|
[11:11] <asac> that would be quite cool i think |
|
[11:13] <asac> james_w: so i can export-upstream-revision = <revno-upstream-head> ... and bzr commit would look at the export-upstream = ... field, then guess the upstream revision-id ... and remember that in the commit somewhere? |
|
[11:14] <asac> sounds like massiv magic ;) |
|
[11:17] <asac> james_w: or do I need to use tag: ... for now? (in export-upstream-revision) |
|
[11:17] <asac> (would work too here i guess) |
|
[11:30] <james_w> there's no magic to remember a revision id |
|
[11:31] <james_w> if you put a revision number in export-upstream-revision then it will look up that revision number in whatever you have for export-upstream whenever it needs that revision |
|
[11:34] <asac> james_w: ok. how is the syntax for a revision-id? |
|
[11:34] <asac> is there some prefix like: tag: |
|
[11:34] <asac> or just the revision id? |
|
[11:34] <james_w> revid: |
|
[11:38] <asac> cool |
|
[11:38] <asac> that will work |
|
[14:12] <fta2> asac, why did you remove the shlib from nspr ? |
|
[14:26] <asac> fta2: whats the prob? |
|
[15:10] <fta2> http://package-import.ubuntu.com/x/xulrunner-1.9/ |
|
[15:11] <asac> yeah |
|
[15:11] <asac> i looked at those |
|
[15:11] <asac> as outlined in mail its not really for us yet ;) |
|
[15:12] <asac> but a good start |
|
[15:12] <fta2> indeed. it should identify VCS-* and try to merge that with what has been really pushed. tricky. |
|
[15:13] <asac> fta2: heh |
|
[15:13] <asac> fta2: yeah. well. do you have scrollback? |
|
[15:13] <asac> fta2: i talked about it with james |
|
[15:13] <fta2> not here. only at home |
|
[15:13] <asac> fta2: we need to add a meta file that refers to upstream branch and revision-id |
|
[15:14] <asac> we would then commit that when we bump the changelog |
|
[15:14] <asac> unfortunate that we dont have a .upstream branch |
|
[15:14] <asac> but we actually could use something like the import .upstream branch |
|
[15:14] <asac> fta2: i wonder how long branching xulrunner .upstream takes ;) |
|
[15:14] <asac> its quite a bunch of files |
|
[15:16] * asac runs time bzr branch http://package-import.ubuntu.com/x/xulrunner-1.9/intrepid-upstream |
|
[15:16] <fta2> i gave up on imports of upstream branches in lp for chromium, always broken :( |
|
[15:18] <fta2> and locally, git-svn is many times faster than bzr-svn |
|
[15:18] <fta2> so i work in git now |
|
[15:18] <asac> yeah |
|
[16:54] <fta2> asac, bug 302859 |
|
[16:54] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 302859 in epiphany-browser "Epiphany: Failed to instantiate LoginManager" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/302859 |
|
[16:57] <fta2> same for me |
|
[17:04] <fta2> this is related to 1.9.1 |
|
[17:34] <asac> fta2: yes. maxVersion issue too here |
|
[17:38] <fta2> yep, i've mentionned that in the bug already, i'll prepare a patch for seb |
|
=== Nukeador_ is now known as Nukeador |
|
=== ZrZ is now known as RzR |
|
=== Nukeador_ is now known as Nukeador |
|
=== Nukeador_ is now known as Nukeador |
|
=== fta_ is now known as fta |
|
=== RzR is now known as rZr |
|
|