| [00:01] <asac> crimsun: can you hold back on the major refactoring due to the amd64 plugin that came up until UDS | |
| [00:01] <asac> ? | |
| [00:01] <asac> there are a few things we should consider when seriously touching that package again | |
| [00:01] <crimsun> asac: sure | |
| === fabrice_sp_ is now known as fabrice_sp | |
| [09:32] <gnomefreak> anyone have the master hotmail bug handy? | |
| [10:09] <gnomefreak> bug 155459 | |
| [10:09] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 155459 in firefox "login hotmail.com" [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155459 | |
| [10:18] <gnomefreak> i give up i cant find that bug to save my life | |
| === directhe` is now known as directhex | |
| [12:59] * asac yawns | |
| [15:27] <rzr> asac: hi, I need your advice | |
| [15:27] <rzr> asac: about flashblock, upstream never pull real version into repository's files | |
| [15:27] <rzr> he uses alpha versions all the time | |
| [15:28] <rzr> so should we set this by hand (as he does) or uses alpha versions ... | |
| [15:28] <rzr> #2 option is better for me | |
| [15:54] <Volans> Hi all :) | |
| [15:55] <Volans> asac: did you remember that you can't contact all members of a LP group if someone of them hide the email address to others? | |
| [15:55] <Volans> There was an LP bug open and now a fix was released.... see LP bug 66105 | |
| [15:56] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 66105 in launchpad-registry "Team admin can't contact prospective member who hides e-mail addresses" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/66105 | |
| [15:56] <Volans> ;) | |
| [16:11] <asac> Volans: oh | |
| [16:11] <asac> and what about actual members that are not prospective? | |
| [16:11] <asac> does that work too? how? | |
| [16:24] <Volans> asac: sincerly I don't have investigated, just at work now and when I have received the email from LP I have remember that we have spoken about that when organizing the mozillateam meetings ;) | |
| === stevel_ is now known as stevel | |
| === stevel is now known as stevel-smegging- | |
| === stevel-smegging- is now known as stevel | |
| [17:18] <nxvl> hi! | |
| [17:18] <nxvl> where can i put an ini that goes to ./usr/lib/firefox-$VERSION/distribution/ so it's version independient? | |
| [18:45] <Lns> asac: hey, is the newly released FF 3.0.4+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 including the /dev/urandom fix ? I don't see it in the changelog, but i might just not be seeing it.. | |
| [18:55] <nxvl> asac: ping | |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | |
| [20:25] <saivann> asac : ping | |
| [20:26] <nxvl_> fta: ping | |
| [20:50] <fta> nxvl_, pong | |
| [20:51] <nxvl_> fta: hi! i'm fighting with a binary package for firefox, which is installing everything into /usr/lib/firefox-VERSION, i already moved the extension to where it should be to be version independendt | |
| [20:51] <nxvl_> fta: but still don't know where to put the distribution.ini | |
| [20:52] <nxvl_> which is installed in /usr/lib/firefox-VERSION/distribution | |
| [20:52] <nxvl_> fta: did you have any idea of where it should go? | |
| [20:53] <fta> hm, i don't think you should use /usr/lib/firefox-VERSION at all. it's not stable as it changes for each version. | |
| [20:53] <nxvl_> yup | |
| [20:53] <nxvl_> that's why i want to move it from there | |
| [20:53] <nxvl_> but i don't know where to put it | |
| [20:53] <fta> what do you mean by "binary package for firefox" ? | |
| [20:53] <nxvl_> as in i'm trying to get rid of it | |
| [20:53] <fta> what project is that? | |
| [20:53] <nxvl_> is a google toolbar binary package | |
| [20:55] <fta> it's not an extension? | |
| [20:56] <nxvl_> containing an extension | |
| [20:56] <fta> we have stable paths for extensions and plugins | |
| [20:56] <nxvl_> i'm not sure what it does or has | |
| [20:57] <nxvl_> fta: did you have a wiki page or something i take a look at? | |
| === nxvl_ is now known as nxvl | |
| [20:57] <fta> hm, not for that i'm afraid. we have one for extensions, and one for xulapps | |
| [20:58] <fta> do you have an install.rdf ? | |
| [21:02] * nxvl checks | |
| [21:03] <nxvl> yes i have | |
| [21:04] <fta> so it's an extenson | |
| [21:04] <fta> you can use the xpi feature from mozilla-devscripts | |
| [21:04] <fta> i should automagically do everything for you | |
| [21:08] <fta> -i+it | |
| [21:09] <fta> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions | |
| [21:12] <fta> [reed], mconnor: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/jpeg/MOZCHANGES "Lots of undocumented changes. :(" bad :( | |
| [21:12] <[reed]> talk to glennmp | |
| [21:12] <[reed]> oh | |
| [21:12] <[reed]> jpeg | |
| [21:12] <[reed]> I dunno | |
| [21:12] <[reed]> yeah | |
| [21:12] <[reed]> don't use system-jpeg | |
| [21:12] <[reed]> ;) | |
| [21:13] <fta> we don't, but we should | |
| [21:13] <mconnor> I don't know if that's even still current | |
| [21:13] <mconnor> that's a five year old comment, likely | |
| [21:13] <fta> chromium took yours, so it's another copy, bad | |
| [21:14] <mconnor> hmm | |
| [21:14] <mconnor> neat | |
| [21:14] <mconnor> maybe we should be the new system-jpeg :) | |
| [21:14] <fta> yep maybe, afaik, upstream is dead | |
| [21:15] <fta> README for release 6b of 27-Mar-1998 | |
| [21:16] <[reed]> there's a lot of good patches still in bmo for our libjpeg | |
| [21:16] <[reed]> so, yeah, we probably are the best new owners of system jpeg | |
| [21:16] <[reed]> :) | |
| [21:16] <fta> my point is that if those patches are so good, they should be in system lib | |
| [21:17] <fta> but your patches are not documented | |
| [21:18] <[reed]> they are in bonsai ;) | |
| [21:18] <[reed]> and bugzilla | |
| [21:19] <fta> somewhere in zillions of bugs... | |
| [21:22] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/74007/ | |
| [21:23] <[reed]> I know our libjpeg is faster than everybody else's | |
| [21:23] <[reed]> some smart guy at Intel worked on it | |
| [21:23] <[reed]> :) | |
| [21:24] <fta> with your sse/sse2/mmx code, i have no doubt about it | |
| [23:03] <fta> individual changes are lost :( big merges from the early days | |
| [23:39] <fta> mozilla bug 299200 | |
| [23:39] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 299200 in Menus "context menu is out of window" [Normal,Verified: duplicate] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299200 | |
| [23:43] <fta> mozilla bug 1025 | |
| [23:43] <ubottu> Mozilla bug 1025 in GFX "NGLayout crashes on this URL" [Critical,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1025 | |