| [03:28] <TheMuso> c | |
| === amitk_ is now known as amitk | |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | |
| === BenC1 is now known as BenC | |
| [13:58] <apw> does anyone have a toshiba laptop who might be interested in testing out an intrepid based forward port of the hardy toshiba_acpi module? | |
| === sconklin1 is now known as sconklin | |
| [16:05] <Kw4h> i have a question regarding the gspca drivers on ubuntu | |
| [16:05] <Kw4h> in the sourcecode from both the official gspca driver, and the gspca-source package, my webcam sensor isn't defined right | |
| [16:05] <Kw4h> after changing it, building the source, and reloading the driver the logs show that it still loads the wrong sensor | |
| [16:06] <Kw4h> now I changed the 'gspca' module, but the module responsible for the webcam is 'gspca_vc032x' (which is depandant on 'gspca_main') | |
| [16:06] <Kw4h> does anyone know how those two (gspca and gspca_main) interact? | |
| [17:02] <BenC> Kw4h: sounds like you have a lot of cruft modules...you should clean things up a bit | |
| [17:02] <BenC> amitk: ubuntu-jaunty raw rebase pushed | |
| [17:02] <Kw4h> BenC - this is pretty much a clean Kubuntu installation | |
| [17:02] <amitk> sweet, cloning now | |
| [17:03] <BenC> Kw4h: no idea how those things interact then...you are compiling external modules to what we supply stock, so you are bound to get some conflicts | |
| [17:04] <Kw4h> the 'gspca' module already existed | |
| [17:04] <Kw4h> I merely recompiled it | |
| [17:04] <Kw4h> also the gspca_main module came with kubuntu out of the box | |
| [18:29] <Kw4h> so, what gspca version is distributed by ubuntu then? gspca v2? | |
| [18:33] <Kw4h> ah... moinejf.free.fr - that one | |
| === Guest37439 is now known as fddfoo | |
| === emgent_ is now known as emgent | |
| === cropalato_ is now known as cropalato | |
| === cropalato is now known as ricardo-cropalat | |
| === ricardo-cropalat is now known as croaplato | |
| === croaplato is now known as cropalato | |
| === kirkland` is now known as kirkland | |
| [23:32] <mkrufky> i know there is a nice command that generates a perfectly formatted git pull request against a target tree / branch ... i thought it was git-pull-request, but i thought wrong | |
| [23:32] <mkrufky> anybody know offhand? | |
| [23:34] <ogasawara> mkrufky: I think it's git-request-pull ? | |
| [23:34] <mkrufky> ah, lol | |
| [23:34] <mkrufky> thanks | |
| [23:54] <trv__> hello. I have noticed that by doing a " cat /proc/kallsyms | grep sys_call_table " it returns you the symbol and the address of the sys_call_table. BUT, doing so in debian/redhat(and derivatives), even in vanilla kernel also, returns nothing ! | |
| [23:54] <trv__> what's going on ? | |