| [03:09] <[reed]> fta: lol | |
| [03:09] <[reed]> fta: now, what are you going to do? | |
| [03:31] <gnomefreak> crimsun: if your are still awake can you give me a hand on why my colume gets muted all the time even arter canging it? | |
| [04:11] <gnomefreak> asac: fta: im only here checking email. Did you find anything wwrong with the extensions, ive been trying to get someone to upload them to universe for 2/3 months. i would like to know why. | |
| [04:37] <gnomefreak> anyway im gonna have a drink in hopes i sleep tonight. | |
| [11:09] <armin76> asac: i was wrong...1.9 sigbuses...i think it was beta5 the one that worked fine | |
| [11:20] <BUGabundo_work> hi | |
| [11:20] <BUGabundo_work> http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2008/11/now_supporting_16_exabytes.html | |
| [11:20] <BUGabundo_work> mozzila has release an alpha version of flash 64 bits | |
| [11:20] <BUGabundo_work> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/ | |
| [11:20] <BUGabundo_work> can we have it packaged on a PPA so we can test it on jaunty? | |
| [11:29] <armin76> quick | |
| [11:30] <BUGabundo_work> sorry armin76? | |
| [11:30] <armin76> nothing *g* | |
| [12:28] * directhex melts | |
| [12:28] <directhex> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/releasenotes_64bit.html | |
| [12:29] <directhex> 64 motherloving bits! | |
| [12:30] <BUGabundo_work> too late directhex | |
| [12:30] <BUGabundo_work> already mention it | |
| [12:30] <BUGabundo_work> even emailed the MLK | |
| [12:30] <BUGabundo_work> *ML | |
| [12:31] <directhex> poot | |
| [12:35] <armin76> asac: hrm...and beta5 did as well...weird | |
| [14:51] <asac> fta: did you trash i386 build for nspluginwrapper? | |
| [14:51] <asac> 1.1.0 is available on i386 .... 1.2.0 not | |
| [14:52] <asac> strange | |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | |
| [16:47] <fta2> asac, i didn't, we talked about that already, it's blocked somewhere i don't remember | |
| [16:47] <asac> fta2: yeah. it was added to p-a-s :( | |
| [16:48] <asac> fta2: http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?rev=1.712&root=dak&view=markup | |
| [16:48] <fta2> yes, pas | |
| [16:48] <asac> i sent mail to the folks that can commit there | |
| [16:48] <fta2> i asked for it to be fixed a while ago, no new since | |
| [16:49] <asac> fta2: how did you ask? | |
| [16:49] <fta2> irc, they directed me to a list of 3 emails | |
| [16:50] <asac> fta2: yeah most likely the ones in the file | |
| [16:50] <asac> i sent there too now | |
| [16:51] <asac> infinity is in that list. but he is on holiday after the jaunty bootstrapping | |
| [17:00] <mconnor> that sentence is so much funnier before you realize jaunty is 9.04 | |
| [17:03] <asac> mconnor: must be native speaker fun ;) | |
| [17:04] <mconnor> asac: its just the idea of jaunty bootstrapping | |
| [17:04] <asac> hehe | |
| [17:04] <asac> is jaunty a rarely used word? | |
| [17:13] <mconnor> asac: its rather uncommon these days | |
| [17:20] <fta2> asac, kees sent me a debdiff to support the new native 64bit flash plugin | |
| [17:20] <fta2> it's also in his ppa | |
| [17:38] <asac> fta: yeah. cant do that until its final | |
| [18:02] <asac> at least till beta | |
| [18:24] <philsf> is asac's word on bug #279802 final? (i.e. nothing to be done in Ubuntu's FF3.0.3, it's a hotmail bug) will the change from 3.0.2 that causes this "regression" will not be reverted? | |
| [18:24] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 279802 in ubuntu "hotmail blocks ubuntu users (we knew it!)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/279802 | |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | |
| [19:33] <armin76> asac: hows is it possible that beta5 doesn't sigbuses when running with gdb? | |
| [22:41] <asac> armin76: not sure ;) | |
| [22:46] <fta> asac, not even in jaunty? | |
| [22:51] <asac> fta: alpha flash? | |
| [22:51] <asac> not sure. we need to discuss that | |
| [22:51] <asac> there are a bunch of things | |
| [23:44] <crimsun> fta: I also have a new source package for the 64-bit Flash | |
| [23:45] <crimsun> fta: i.e., I've refactored debian/{config,postinst} to handle both 32- and 64-bit, so if installing on 32, you get the stable, and on 64 the alpha. I've tested it for new installs and upgrades on hardy and intrepid for both i686 and amd64. | |
| [23:46] <crimsun> asac: yes, it's one thing to consider whether to continue using nspluginwrapper for Flash | |
| [23:49] <asac> crimsun: we want it | |
| [23:49] <asac> have to discuss with nspluginwrapper upstream | |
| [23:49] <asac> want it == not mandatory of course | |
| [23:49] <asac> the idea why we brought this is to prevent crashes of ffox | |
| [23:50] <asac> brough this to i386 i mean ;) | |
| [23:50] <asac> crimsun: are you working on a new package? | |
| [23:50] <asac> crimsun: we have to talk then ;) | |
| [23:50] <asac> crimsun: will you be at UDS? | |
| [23:54] <crimsun> asac: yes, Sunday through Wednesday | |
| [23:55] <fta> crimsun, maybe talk with kees then. and i assume there's no point in me touching that too. | |
| [23:57] <crimsun> fta: just figuring out a local bzr issue, thanks | |
| [23:57] <crimsun> I'll need to add the nspluginwrapper bit back in, then | |