|
=== asac_ is now known as asac |
|
=== asac_ is now known as asac |
|
=== asac_ is now known as asac |
|
=== mdz_ is now known as mdz |
|
=== mvo_ is now known as mvo |
|
[11:23] <davmor2> morning heno |
|
[11:24] <heno> morning davmor2 |
|
[11:55] <stgraber> hello |
|
[11:56] <davmor2> hello stgraber |
|
[11:56] * heno does a sanity check of kub oem |
|
[11:57] <davmor2> heno: check you got the right cd riddell only uploaded an hour ago |
|
[11:57] <heno> ok, thanks |
|
[12:00] <davmor2> heno: made the same mistake the fiwes are in 1.10.8 of ubiquity |
|
[12:02] <davmor2> s/fiwes/files |
|
[12:10] <davmor2> heno: direct install works |
|
[12:30] <Zombieff> hi all |
|
[12:31] <davmor2> Hi |
|
[12:31] <Zombieff> I've just installed Intrepid on my Eee PC 701 and found eeepc-acpi-scripts package broken |
|
[12:32] <Zombieff> it requires acpi-support package, which is not present |
|
[12:35] <Zombieff> does anyone use 8.10 on Eee PC? |
|
[12:36] <davmor2> nope |
|
[12:36] <davmor2> acer aspire one |
|
[12:36] <davmor2> but it works on that |
|
[12:40] <Zombieff> ok, this bug is already reported at launchpad |
|
[12:54] <davmor2> heno: oem works here |
|
[14:21] <slangasek> first candidate ISOs for final posted |
|
[14:22] <stgraber> cool |
|
[14:24] <IrishDavid> how can i upgrade 8.04 to 8.10 RC1? |
|
[14:27] * stgraber takes Ubuntu alternate amd64 |
|
[14:32] <davmor2> slangasek: Ahead of yourself aren't you ;) |
|
[14:32] <slangasek> ? |
|
[14:33] <davmor2> First candidate cd's......Wasn't expecting any till at least tomorrow :) |
|
[14:34] <slangasek> that means we're on schedule |
|
[14:34] <davmor2> :) |
|
[14:39] <davmor2> slangasek: is it only alt's at the minute then? |
|
[14:39] <stgraber> slangasek: that's great, should happen more often :) |
|
[14:39] <slangasek> davmor2: yes, alternates always finish quicker |
|
[14:39] <slangasek> (desktop CD build started at the exact same time) |
|
[14:40] <davmor2> slangasek: Okay cool :) |
|
[14:40] <stgraber> I take: Ubuntu alt amd64 -> erase disk / erase disk + lvm / LTSP / free software only / expert |
|
[14:59] <slangasek> oops, kubuntu alternate oversized, respinning |
|
[14:59] <muibe> wlan works oddly - it takes many minutes until I'm able to get the connection |
|
[14:59] <muibe> my wlan is atheros 5006 |
|
[15:00] <muibe> the driver i use is madwifi-hal-0.10.5.6-r3835-20080801 |
|
[15:01] <muibe> it worked all ok before but i've had these problems since i upgraded the os yesterday |
|
[15:06] <slangasek> muibe: this is not the best channel on which to seek help for such issues; you may want to try #ubuntu-kernel instead |
|
[15:07] <slangasek> muibe: but if you upgraded the OS to Ubuntu 8.10 RC, there are known problems with ath5k in the 2.6.27 kernel - you're probably lucky that it worked at all(!) |
|
[15:11] <slangasek> kubuntu alternate respun; first desktop images posted |
|
[15:13] <muibe> slangasek: thanks for the advice ;) |
|
[15:15] * heno syncs |
|
[15:17] * davmor2 stops syncing as bandwidth is being killed by wubi upgrade |
|
[15:19] * pedro_ syncing desktop i386 |
|
[15:20] * davmor2 thinks netboot can wait till I have bandwidth in the morning :) |
|
[15:24] <kwwii> ok, someone tell me what to test :-) |
|
[15:25] <davmor2> kwwii: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/all/all any of these |
|
[15:26] <kwwii> davmor2: cool, rysnc-ing now |
|
[15:29] <davmor2> heno: How many minimum tests each? |
|
[15:30] <heno> davmor2: we'll aim for two of each |
|
[15:30] <davmor2> Cool :) |
|
[15:32] * heno grabs some food |
|
[15:43] <slangasek> xubuntu alternates got built with some out-of-date packages due to an archive sync issue; trying a respin |
|
[15:56] <slangasek> ok, xubuntu alternates appear fixed |
|
[16:21] <ad_> hey anyone here |
|
[16:33] <davmor2> ad_: yes |
|
[16:33] <ad_> hey im trying to install yelp-dbgsym=2.24.0-0ubuntu2.8.10 to backtrace a bug on intrepiud but cant seem to install it |
|
[16:37] <davmor2> ad_: That's cause it's not there. I'm not sure if it got integrated into the yelp package itself |
|
[16:37] <ad_> ok then well I run this could you taek a look |
|
[16:37] <ad_> http://pastebin.com/m38d2d98a |
|
[16:38] <ad_> maybe you know whats going wrong |
|
[16:38] <davmor2> Hmmm no hang on |
|
[16:38] <ad_> is that correctly backtraced is my first question |
|
[16:40] <davmor2> ad_: what's the bug? |
|
[16:41] <ad_> edit will not function after upgrading to Intrepid from Hardy - either running gedit from the menu or terminal renders the same output. |
|
[16:41] <ad_> *gedit |
|
[16:59] <mvo> could someone please check if the spx file in the example folder plays for them? I just did a test install on a system with no soundcard (VM) and totem hangs for me when I try to open it |
|
[17:12] <kwwii> mvo: works for me |
|
[17:13] <stgraber> half of Ubuntu alternate amd64 is now done |
|
[17:14] <mvo> kwwii: thanks, I think its because I have no working soundcard in the test system (somewhat unusual :) |
|
[17:16] <kwwii> yeah, that cannot be the way things should work |
|
[17:22] <tuxxy__> hey anyone here, I wondering if my open/close compiz animations being faulty is worth a bug report |
|
[17:23] <davmor2> tuxxy__: what happens |
|
[17:24] <tuxxy__> none of the clos/opene animations work with this error in .xsession |
|
[17:24] <tuxxy__> /usr/bin/compiz.real (animation) - Error: Animation settings mismatch in "Animation Selection" list for Close event. |
|
[17:24] <tuxxy__> this was an upgrade |
|
[17:24] <davmor2> mvo: ^ |
|
[17:25] <tuxxy__> /usr/bin/compiz.real (animation) - Error: Animation settings mismatch in "Animation Selection" list for Open event. |
|
[17:25] <tuxxy__> etc |
|
[17:26] <mvo> tuxxy__: I check it out |
|
[17:26] <tuxxy__> no bug then |
|
[17:26] <tuxxy__> thanks |
|
[17:27] <mvo> tuxxy__: thank you! did you change the animation settings or did you stick with the hardy defaults ? |
|
[17:28] <tuxxy__> yes I enabled the new animations plugin and everything seems to work fine except open/close animations and also I get a little distortion with some effects when I minimize/maximize |
|
[17:28] <tuxxy__> usually distortion is in the top window frame maybe an issue with emerald I dont kno |
|
[17:29] <tuxxy__> I plan to fresh install again in 3 days so hopefully that should fix it all although I have my /home partition seperate so I hope it doesnt happen again |
|
[17:30] <tuxxy__> *frsh install |
|
[17:31] <tuxxy__> hardly any animations worked at first until I enabled the enw animations plugin in compiz then my minimize/maximize worked fine but not the open/close |
|
[17:33] <tuxxy__> i also tried the old nvidia driver v173 but no luck |
|
[17:36] * stgraber takes Ubuntu Desktop amd64 |
|
[17:36] <mvo> tuxxy__: please add a bugreport just so that this information does not get lost and let me know about the bugnumber when its finished, I'm running a test to see if I can reproduce it |
|
[17:37] <tuxxy__> ok will do, this is on AMD64 - nvidia 8600GTS |
|
[17:37] <tuxxy__> upger |
|
[17:37] <tuxxy__> upgrade to Ibux from Hardy |
|
[17:49] <tuxxy__> mvo: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/289966 |
|
[17:49] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 289966 in compiz "Open/Close animations do not function after upgrade to Intrepid" [Undecided,New] |
|
[17:56] <TedC> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/289952 |
|
[17:56] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 289952 in update-manager "[8.10] update-manager ignores sources.list during hardy->intrepid upgrade" [Undecided,New] |
|
[18:12] <stgraber> OEM tests successful on both desktop and alternate (Ubuntu) |
|
[18:29] <heno> I'm getting a black screen on kub oem 64-bit (kvm) |
|
[18:30] <heno> but in a different place this time, after the user config |
|
[18:30] <heno> davmor2 reported success earlier though |
|
[18:31] <heno> could someone try that on hw, vm or vbox? |
|
[18:31] <heno> to rule out kvm-isms |
|
[18:56] * heno starts xubuntu 64 alt |
|
[19:06] * stgraber takes edubuntu amd64 |
|
[19:07] <stgraber> failed |
|
[19:07] <stgraber> slangasek: ^ |
|
[19:07] <stgraber> it tried to get packages from the internet (as usual) |
|
[19:07] <stgraber> libgsm1 and libavcodec51 |
|
[19:08] <stgraber> slangasek: what do we expect from the edubuntu addon ? being able to install without internet or just to install (I did have internet enabled when installing so I have it in my sources.list) |
|
[19:09] <stgraber> heno: ^ |
|
[19:10] <heno> hm, it worked here, but I had network |
|
[19:11] <stgraber> yeah, with network it'd have downloaded these two packages |
|
[19:11] <stgraber> my question is: Is it supposed to install without internet ? |
|
[19:11] <stgraber> IIRC it was supposed to but never quite did |
|
[19:11] <heno> how ungracefully does it fail? |
|
[19:11] <stgraber> (since we turned the recommends on) |
|
[19:12] <heno> I guess you can install most apps individually |
|
[19:12] <stgraber> heno: "Some softwares can't be installed because the installer is unable to get some needed packages" or something similar |
|
[19:12] <stgraber> so only part of it won't be installed |
|
[19:12] <heno> I guess those two packages should be seeded |
|
[19:13] <stgraber> and I suspect that if I didn't have internet when doing the install it wouldn't even have tried to download these |
|
[19:13] <heno> sounds like a fairly simple fix - there is certainly space now |
|
[19:13] <stgraber> yeah, IIRC we have some free space on the edubuntu CD |
|
[19:13] <heno> 300+MB |
|
[19:13] <heno> WinFOSS has been removed now |
|
[19:14] <stgraber> oh, ok I'll add that to my testcase change list, so they get removed |
|
[19:14] <heno> I've counted removed winfoss as a PASS :) |
|
[19:15] <stgraber> yeah because it was successfully removed :) |
|
[20:08] <mvo> bdmurray: do you think you could squeeze in a SRU verification ? (for #289855 and #255545)? |
|
[20:10] <bdmurray> mvo: I'll get with sbeattie and see what we can work out |
|
[20:10] <bdmurray> mvo: bug 289855 seems the more important of the two is that right? |
|
[20:13] <bdmurray> mvo_: did you see my last msg? |
|
[20:18] <mvo_> bdmurray: no, looks like I disconnected before :/ |
|
[20:18] * mvo_ kicks his network |
|
[20:20] <bdmurray> I'll get with sbeattie and see what we can work out |
|
[20:20] <bdmurray> bug 289855 seems the more important of the two is that right? |
|
[20:20] <mvo_> thanks! its hopefully really easy/straightforward |
|
[20:20] <mvo_> the apt one is slightly more important, but they are roughtly equal |
|
[20:21] <bdmurray> okay |
|
[20:42] <bdmurray> sbeattie: mvo was looking for some help with sru verification of a hardy2intrepid upgrade |
|
[20:43] <bdmurray> sbeattie: actually 2 of them |
|
[20:43] <bdmurray> maybe we can split them between us? |
|
[20:43] <sbeattie> bdmurray: sure. |
|
[20:44] <bdmurray> sbeattie: actually dependent on each other |
|
[20:44] <sbeattie> the update-manager one and the apt one? |
|
[20:44] <bdmurray> hmm, actually they seem dependent on each other |
|
[20:45] <bdmurray> yeah, that's them |
|
[20:45] <bdmurray> I have a hardy vm I could do it with |
|
[20:46] <sbeattie> I don't mind, I was going to do some more upgrade testing today. |
|
[20:47] <sbeattie> if nothing else, it's also useful to an upgrade from a system with hardy-proposed enabled as well. |
|
[20:51] <bdmurray> It might be good for the SRU screencast too - or maybe bug 270777. I have hardware for that |
|
|