| [00:00] <NCommander> oh | |
| [00:00] <NCommander> er | |
| [00:22] <porthose> csilk: look at man dpkg-buildpackage :) | |
| [00:22] <csilk> will do | |
| [01:00] <csilk> why does the latest packaged version of dh-make auto include a standards version of 3.7.3 then 2.8.0 is the current standard (according to lintian)? | |
| [01:01] <csilk> *when 3.8.0 | |
| [01:04] <lfaraone> james_w: ping | |
| [01:04] <lfaraone> james_w: I'm getting an odd error when trying to build sugar on intrepid: | |
| [01:04] <lfaraone> fakeroot debian/rules clean | |
| [01:04] <lfaraone> debian/rules:15: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk: No such file or directory | |
| [01:04] <lfaraone> make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk'. Stop. | |
| [01:38] <LaserJock> lfaraone: install quilt | |
| [01:52] <csilk> If I'm packaging an app I got through CVS, should I remove all cvs related files form the app's directory structure before I make a .orig.tar.gzip ? | |
| [01:52] <csilk> *.gz | |
| [02:05] <porthose> csilk: yes:) | |
| [02:06] <csilk> porthose, hi, time for another quick question? | |
| [02:06] <porthose> sure | |
| [02:07] <csilk> I'm packaging a new app. the app has a 'bug' which causes a compilation error udner the newer versions of GCC, upstream advise (in their install instructions) that users add 2 lines of code to the top of a C++ source file. If I do this in the package do I just note that in the changelog or is modifying the code a big no no? | |
| [02:08] <csilk> porthose, ^ | |
| [02:09] <porthose> hmm not sure about that one | |
| [02:10] <csilk> Yeah, I'm not too sure how to proceed with this | |
| [02:10] <porthose> maybe someone with more experience could help out? | |
| [02:10] <csilk> hopefull | |
| [02:10] <csilk> y | |
| === txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger | |
| [03:09] <Awsoonn> are there any known plans to release a desktop CD for the ppc? or are they only going to be given an alternitive install disc with intrepid? | |
| [03:18] <csilk> is there a way to stop debuild from trying to sign a dsc file? | |
| [03:18] <TheMuso> Awsoonn: There are ports disks available for PowerPC, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ports | |
| [03:18] <TheMuso> csilk: -uc -us | |
| [03:19] <csilk> thanks | |
| [03:19] <TheMuso> csilk: Welcome. | |
| [03:20] <csilk> TheMuso, would you have any idea about my previous questiona few posts up? | |
| [03:20] <Awsoonn> ahah! I was in the daily dir and not the daily-live, thank you for the calification | |
| [03:20] <Awsoonn> :) | |
| [03:28] <ScottK> csilk: You can patch it. It's strongly preferred to do that with a patch system rather than just a direct modification. | |
| [03:28] <ScottK> For testing your package direct modification work fine. | |
| [03:30] <csilk> ScottK, any standard patching system commonly used that you would suggest? | |
| [03:31] <ScottK> Let me dig you up a link. | |
| [03:32] <ScottK> csilk: There are choices. Up to you. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/PatchSystems | |
| [03:32] <csilk> Thanks | |
| === txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger | |
| [03:51] <csilk> bug patched | |
| [03:51] <csilk> brilliant | |
| [03:51] <csilk> now I just gotta get the menu icons working ;) | |
| [03:51] <NCommander> ScottK, so I'll be there for the entirity of UDS it seems | |
| [03:51] <ScottK> Congratulations. It's a good experience. | |
| [03:53] <NCommander> I'm going to be there because a professor kicked me out of his class for BS reasons | |
| [03:53] <NCommander> Just confirms to me to leave on sabatical winter quarter | |
| [03:53] <Hobbsee> sweet | |
| [03:54] <TheMuso> NCommander: While that sounds good for UDS, thats not so good for your studies. | |
| [03:54] <NCommander> The problem was the professor took issue with me helping other students in lab | |
| [03:54] <NCommander> "You are a student, if someone else needs help, have them come to me" | |
| [03:54] <Hobbsee> wow... | |
| [03:54] <NCommander> Yeah | |
| [03:54] <NCommander> Its not my first time taking this class | |
| [03:54] <ajmitch> oh dear | |
| [03:54] <ajmitch> that's just retarded | |
| [03:54] <NCommander> (I was in a car wreck the day of the final and was unable to get credit for it) | |
| [03:55] <NCommander> ^the first time around | |
| [03:55] <NCommander> I had a B+ then | |
| [03:55] <Hobbsee> car accidents aren't acceptable reasons for delaying exams there? ouch! | |
| [03:55] * ajmitch was helping students in class one semester, the next year I was paid to help tutor in the lab | |
| [03:55] <NCommander> Hobbsee, New York State finals are held very irregularly | |
| [03:55] <NCommander> and I didn't pass when I retook it six months later | |
| [03:55] <Hobbsee> oh, right | |
| [03:55] * NCommander simply couldn't retain the skills without praticing them for that long | |
| [03:56] <NCommander> so I retook the class | |
| [03:56] <NCommander> Just to get this load of ****shit | |
| [03:56] <NCommander> er | |
| [03:56] <NCommander> I censored the wrong part | |
| [03:56] <ajmitch> heh | |
| [03:56] <TheMuso> hehe | |
| [03:56] <ScottK> Were these perishable skills censoring skillz? | |
| [03:56] * NCommander hits ScottK with a lawn GNOME | |
| [03:57] <ScottK> Sorry. It had to be said. | |
| [03:57] <ajmitch> no, it really didn't | |
| [03:57] <ajmitch> that's like leaping on the first available pun | |
| [03:59] <NCommander> ajmitch, he's from the navy, they don't know better ;-) | |
| [03:59] <LaserJock> TheMuso, ScottK: you guys on MOTU Release? | |
| [03:59] * NCommander runs really fast | |
| [04:00] <ajmitch> hey LaserJock | |
| [04:02] <LaserJock> ajmitch: hola | |
| === txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger | |
| [04:08] * NCommander sighs | |
| [04:08] <NCommander> I feel like .... I dunno | |
| [04:08] <NCommander> Doing something sane | |
| [04:08] <NCommander> like watching TV | |
| [04:08] <txwikinger> wow.. all the dns server for my domain are down | |
| [04:08] <ScottK> LaserJock: Yes. | |
| [04:09] <LaserJock> ScottK: I'd like to upload a bug fix to desktop-multiplier | |
| [04:09] <txwikinger> ScottK: I got your message.. I will take care of it asap | |
| [04:10] <LaserJock> ScottK: it's technically a bug-fix new upstream release as its closed source | |
| [04:10] <LaserJock> pretty minor changes though from what I got from the author | |
| [04:12] <cody-somerville> Hey LaserJock :) | |
| [04:13] <LaserJock> hi cody | |
| === fabrice_sp_ is now known as fabrice_sp | |
| [04:22] <ScottK> LaserJock: If it's bug fix you can just upload it. | |
| [04:23] <LaserJock> ScottK: ok, just wanted to run it by MOTU Release first, even if it's just a FYI | |
| [04:24] <ScottK> LaserJock: Yes. Thanks. Sometimes we get queried by ubuntu-release, so it's helpful. | |
| [04:38] <ScottK> I've heard it said that Ubuntu moves more quickly than Debian because it's more IRC centered and Debian is more ML centered. | |
| [04:39] <ScottK> So last night we had a bit of a flamefest over bluetooth and its' over. | |
| [04:39] <NCommander> ScottK, sounds about right | |
| [04:39] <NCommander> hey persia | |
| [04:39] <ScottK> The Debian ML thread on non-free firmware in the kernel show's no sign of ending. | |
| [04:39] <ScottK> So I guess that's a case in point. | |
| [04:39] <StevenK> On -devel? | |
| [04:39] <ScottK> Yeah | |
| [04:40] <StevenK> Right. Glad I'm unsubscribed | |
| [04:40] <ScottK> I'm not particularly reading them anymore, but I still notice the subject when I hit delete. | |
| [04:40] <StevenK> I'm waiting for -private to have a large flamewar, it's overdue | |
| [04:40] <persia> ScottK, Note that Debian also has flamefests on IRC, and close coordination on IRC for some teams, but that's considered not to count. | |
| [04:41] <ScottK> persia: Yes. I even participate in those sometimes. | |
| [04:41] * NCommander is waiting for the one on d-devel to hit critical mass | |
| [04:41] <NCommander> Its not quite there yet | |
| [04:41] <ajmitch> it's at the threatening GRs stage | |
| [04:41] <LaserJock> is there such a thing in Debian? | |
| [04:41] <ScottK> The last time was someone complaining Ubuntu patches sucked and I volunteered to show them where my patches from Ubuntu sucked so badly they'd be reused without any credit or attribution. | |
| [04:41] <persia> Yes. When a flamefest reaches critical mass, there is a GR. | |
| [04:42] <cody-somerville> GRs? | |
| [04:42] <ScottK> be reused/been reused | |
| [04:42] <StevenK> General Resolution | |
| [04:42] <StevenK> How the Debian project "solves problems" | |
| [04:43] <ScottK> StevenK: I thought the Debian process was spew hate until one side quits and leaves. | |
| [04:43] <ajmitch> good, looks like they're at the filing annoying bugs stage... | |
| [04:43] <ajmitch> bugs.debian.org/502959 | |
| [04:43] <ScottK> That was a couple of days ago. | |
| [04:43] <StevenK> ScottK: That is the long term plan | |
| [04:43] <ScottK> I think GR drafts are coming soon. | |
| [04:43] <ScottK> Ah. | |
| [04:43] <ajmitch> I don't wade into flamefests too often | |
| [04:44] <persia> ScottK, GRs are used to force the side that won't quit to do so. | |
| [04:44] * StevenK remembers this coming up when he worked with Herbert and he was still maintaining the kernel | |
| [04:44] * ScottK notes that that's exactly why he suggested rough consensus for MOTU decisions rather than 51 percent. | |
| [04:46] <persia> ScottK, My only issue with formalising rough consensus was that it was just documentation of existing practice, yet the formalisation itself confused many people. | |
| [04:46] <ajmitch> and if badly run, 'rough consensus' can be browbeating enough people until objections are silenced | |
| [04:46] <ScottK> persia: OK. Hopefully we can get it clearly written down in a way that won't do that. | |
| [04:46] <ScottK> ajmitch: True. | |
| [04:46] <persia> ScottK, Yep. | |
| [04:47] <persia> ajmitch, Indeed, but it's better to emphasise that we seek consensus than to just have everyone bow before the browbeater because they did so in the past. | |
| [04:48] <ScottK> I'm actually quite fond of the IETF idea of "Rough consensus and running code". The IETF would work a lot better if they used it. | |
| [04:48] <ajmitch> persia: of course, browbeating must be done politely if at all possible :) | |
| [04:48] <ScottK> If you have to be mean, stay off logged channels. | |
| [04:48] <ScottK> I messed that one up once. | |
| [04:49] <ajmitch> heh | |
| [04:49] <ajmitch> did it return to bite you? | |
| [04:49] <ScottK> A little bit. | |
| [04:49] <ScottK> I got pretty direct CoC warnings from some senior people in the project. | |
| [04:50] <ScottK> They were right too. | |
| [04:50] * ScottK does, however, note that the meaness was threating to do everything in my power to get a certain someone ejected from the project. | |
| [04:51] * ScottK looks around and doesn't see that someone. | |
| [04:51] <ScottK> So it didn't bit too badly. | |
| [04:51] <ScottK> bit/bite | |
| [04:51] <persia> Well, it's also a time of day issue. This channel is still in autojoin for that person. | |
| [04:51] <ScottK> Yes. I checked before I mentioned it. | |
| [04:52] <ScottK> AFAIK they're still silenced on the channel in any case. | |
| [04:52] * StevenK blinks. | |
| [04:52] * ajmitch is not surprised | |
| [04:52] <persia> Yes. I was hoping to be able to lift that soon, but some of the support building in Debian washed away during the Lenny freeze, so it maybe a while yet. | |
| [04:53] <persia> s/maybe/may be/ | |
| [04:53] * ScottK notes that he did file a good bug the other day. | |
| [04:54] <ajmitch> ScottK: the problem wasn't the few good ones, sadly | |
| [04:54] <persia> Yeah. He's been getting a lot better, which is why the gag is starting to seem superfluous, but it requires certain criteria to be met before it can be lifted. | |
| [04:54] <ScottK> ajmitch: Agreed. | |
| [04:54] <ajmitch> even I can file a good bug, if the moon is in the right phase | |
| [04:55] <ScottK> persia: clamtk finds the clamav test files just fine, BTW. | |
| [04:55] <persia> Anyway, we've all spent enough bytes on this issue over the past 18 months. More doesn't help. | |
| [04:55] <persia> ScottK, Yep. I tested that last night, although after the sync due to excellent service on the part of the archive-admins. | |
| [04:56] <StevenK> persia: Are you sure? Debian seems to follow the reverse. | |
| [04:56] <persia> At this point, all the pending translations from the Japanese team are included, which is a good thing. | |
| [04:57] <persia> StevenK, One of the ways we aren't Debian is that we tend to accept when something is over, and only re-raise it when there are new changes that make it relevant. | |
| [04:59] <slangasek> one wonders if you meant to type "Sven" instead of "Debian" | |
| [04:59] <persia> slangasek, I'm trying not to point at specific individuals, but that's an example. | |
| [05:01] <slangasek> persia: as a DD, I find it kind of insulting that you're making such a generalization about Debian, particularly if Sven is one of the "examples" since he's not part of Debian... | |
| [05:02] <slangasek> (there are other examples who are - but I still don't think it's a fair generalization of the project) | |
| [05:02] <ScottK> In other news, the libhdf5-serial NBS could use a little working on. | |
| [05:03] <StevenK> octave-gpc? | |
| [05:03] <persia> slangasek, Fair. My experience with most people actually working in Debian is that they are fairly quick to do things well. My experience with d-d@ is that some things drag on for months with no useful input. | |
| [05:03] <StevenK> It's busticated, and I can't fix it | |
| [05:04] * slangasek hides from hdf5 | |
| [05:04] <ScottK> StevenK: That and libgdal-ruby and libdgal1-1.5.0 on lpia and opctave-plplot of hppa | |
| [05:04] <StevenK> ScottK: hppa is on NBS-ignore | |
| [05:04] <ScottK> StevenK: Removal would fix it. | |
| [05:04] <StevenK> ScottK: I'm also ignoring gdal on lpia | |
| [05:04] <StevenK> That leaves octave-gpc, which I tried to fix | |
| [05:05] <ScottK> Mayve NCommander would take a whack at it. He loves pain. | |
| [05:05] <ScottK> Mayve/Maybe. | |
| [05:05] <NCommander> StevenK, as a side note, the DYMANIC_FTRACE kernel upload to lpia was done | |
| [05:05] <StevenK> Its configure script is written assuming that $major_version == 2, and it requires porting to a new octave API | |
| [05:05] * NCommander is being absorbed into the kernel team | |
| [05:06] <StevenK> At this point, I think we don't care, but it's slangasek's call | |
| [05:06] <ScottK> OK. How much do we care about uninstallable? | |
| [05:07] <ajmitch> porting to a new API at this late stage? | |
| [05:07] <slangasek> which part is it we don't care about? | |
| [05:07] <StevenK> slangasek: If octave-gpc is installable/works | |
| [05:07] <ajmitch> ScottK: is that pretty much it for uninstallable packages? | |
| [05:07] <ScottK> ajmitch: Yes. Often because it's in Main and a Dependency is not. | |
| [05:08] <slangasek> StevenK: "would be nice" but if not, them's the breaks | |
| [05:08] <StevenK> I think it's comatose upstream, too | |
| [05:08] <ajmitch> ScottK: oh, just for main, or is everything installable in universe now? | |
| [05:09] <ScottK> ajmitch: I think if something in Universe is actually uninstallable it comes up, but the cases I've looked at have been depends in Universe. | |
| [05:09] * ScottK beats the drum for removal. | |
| [05:10] * NCommander reads from the Book of Dead Packages | |
| [05:11] * persia has 60 uninstallable packages in the amd64 local apt cache. | |
| [05:12] <ajmitch> persia: too late for most of those to be fixed? | |
| [05:13] <persia> ajmitch, Not at all. None of them are on CDs (well, except for some ichthux stuff but that's not an official CD), so no reason we can't push them now. | |
| [05:13] <persia> ajmitch, apt-cache unmet -i should give you a list. | |
| [05:13] * ajmitch wasn't up on when universe is frozen | |
| [05:13] <ScottK> LaserJock: Accepted. | |
| [05:13] <ajmitch> yeah, I've used that in the past | |
| [05:13] <ajmitch> not entirely accurate, since it looks at installed packages as well | |
| [05:13] <NCommander> is it too late to zap a package? | |
| [05:14] <persia> universe is getting more and more frozen as time passes, but stuff that would be SRU-worthy is typically accepted as late as possible. | |
| [05:14] <persia> NCommander, Nope. | |
| [05:14] <NCommander> persia, care to ack a removal request for iceweasel-vimperator? | |
| [05:14] <NCommander> (for obvious reason?) | |
| [05:14] <NCommander> s/\?/s/g | |
| [05:15] <StevenK> How did that manage to get in? | |
| [05:15] <NCommander> Deep magic | |
| [05:15] <persia> NCommander, I don't see the obvious reasons. Is there some good reason why this shouldn't be treated as a bug needing attention of the mozilla-extensions team? | |
| [05:15] <NCommander> we don't have iceweasel in Ubuntu? | |
| [05:15] <StevenK> No | |
| [05:15] <persia> Is it known not to work with firefox? | |
| [05:16] <fabrice_sp> HI. I filed a bug for vimperator, and Mozilla team is having a look at it | |
| [05:16] <NCommander> well | |
| [05:16] <NCommander> That answer sthat | |
| [05:16] <fabrice_sp> Bug #286225 | |
| [05:16] <NCommander> The package explicately depends on iceweasel, but no iceweasel | |
| [05:16] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 286225 in vimperator "[intrepid] iceweasel-vimperator: Depends: iceweasel (>= 3.0~) but it is not instalable" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/286225 | |
| [05:17] <persia> NCommander, Yes, but iceweasel is special, because firefox is nearly the same codebase. | |
| [05:17] <NCommander> I thought iceweasel and firefox extensions were incompabitable | |
| [05:17] * NCommander knows very very little about iceweasel though in Debian | |
| [05:17] <persia> NCommander, Only in rare cases, but they can usually be patched to work. | |
| [05:18] <NCommander> oh, I wasn't aware | |
| [05:18] * NCommander takes a gunshot to his idea to remove the package | |
| [05:18] <NCommander> Was firefox 2 finally killed? | |
| [05:19] <ScottK> NCommander: Yes. | |
| [05:19] <NCommander> cause we still have firefox-theme-ubuntu Depends firefox2 | |
| [05:19] <persia> Is the eog-dev issue just publisher skew? That looks like main. | |
| [05:19] <ScottK> NCommander: Feel free to ask for it's removal then. | |
| [05:19] <coppro> is there no utility that can scan the database for dead dependencies? | |
| [05:20] <StevenK> NCommander: Madison on cocoplum disagrees with you | |
| [05:20] <persia> coppro, https://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck is probably a good place to look. | |
| [05:20] <NCommander> StevenK, disagrees with me on what? | |
| [05:21] <coppro> persia: can't connect to the server | |
| [05:21] <StevenK> NCommander: I can't find 'firefox-theme-ubuntu' | |
| [05:21] <NCommander> firefox-themes-ubuntu | |
| [05:21] <NCommander> :-P | |
| [05:21] <ajmitch> NCommander: if using apt-cache, it has a habit of looking at packages that are/were installed | |
| [05:21] <persia> coppro, Sorry. My fault : http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck/ | |
| [05:21] <NCommander> ajmitch, that was a matter of a missing s | |
| [05:22] <coppro> persia: ah, clever. Someone should really go through that prior to a release | |
| [05:22] * coppro bookmarks | |
| [05:23] <persia> coppro, Lots of people do, but it clearly needs more people. The goal is to get all the numbers to 0 at some point. | |
| [05:23] <StevenK> NCommander: File a bug, and subscribe asac | |
| [05:23] <coppro> persia: yeah, I'm bookmarking it so I can help work on it | |
| [05:23] <coppro> too late to get for intrepid now, though | |
| [05:24] <ajmitch> there's always too much to do before release | |
| [05:24] <coppro> heh | |
| [05:24] <coppro> too true | |
| [05:24] <LaserJock> does anybody remember the email about this error: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated | |
| [05:24] <ajmitch> LaserJock: one sec, let me hunt | |
| [05:25] <ajmitch> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-September/026520.html | |
| [05:26] <ajmitch> I think that's related | |
| [05:27] <ScottK> coppro: Not entirely too late for Intrepid for Universe. | |
| [05:27] * ajmitch just refreshed the rc bugs list after breaking it again last night | |
| [05:28] <ScottK> That's a good source too. | |
| [05:28] <coppro> ScottK: yeah, but /me doesn't have that kind of time probably | |
| [05:28] <coppro> I'll do what I can though! | |
| [05:28] <ajmitch> upgraded to intrepid, new libapt-pkg ABI, rc bugs list breaks | |
| [05:29] <ScottK> ajmitch: Don't worry. If it wasn't that, the new Django API would have gotten you. | |
| [05:30] <ajmitch> oh this is just for the processing side | |
| [05:30] <coppro> on the plus side, my Intrepid is working fine | |
| [05:30] <ajmitch> completely detached from django | |
| [05:30] <coppro> on the down side, there is some changes I'd like to see in the upgrade process, but they are in Main | |
| [05:30] <ajmitch> the django stuff was just an experimental frontend to existing data | |
| [05:30] <coppro> so probably not going to happen :( | |
| [05:33] <NCommander> its weird | |
| [05:34] <NCommander> for the entire time I've been a developer, I've been targetting intrepid | |
| [05:34] <NCommander> and now thats going away as the main target | |
| [05:34] * NCommander feels very strange | |
| [05:35] <ScottK> NCommander: You still have some time to go wild on intrepid SRUs before Jaunty opens. | |
| [05:35] <ajmitch> you'll get used to it | |
| [05:36] <NCommander> I'm just use the eternal sid | |
| [05:40] <ScottK> Good night everyone. | |
| [05:40] <NCommander> good night ScottK, until another day | |
| [05:40] <ScottK> No, it'll still be this one. | |
| [05:41] <NCommander> wow | |
| [05:41] <NCommander> its 00:42 already | |
| [05:43] <persia> NCommander, No, it's 4:43. You're just too far west. | |
| [05:43] <LaserJock> heh, only 21:43 here | |
| [05:44] <LaserJock> I'm still in yesterday | |
| [05:44] <NCommander> LaserJock, that's just lag ;-) | |
| [05:48] <LaserJock> persia: you have any idea what this means in a strace: futex(0x8460110, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL) = ? ERESTARTSYS (To be restarted) | |
| [05:49] <persia> LaserJock, Sorry, no. I understand stack traces, but system call traces usually confuse me. | |
| [05:50] <fabrice_sp> Hi. compilation of gambas2 in amd64 has be changed in P-a-s, but the package still shows as non installable in amd64. Should I fill a bug to force compilation of the package? | |
| [05:50] <fabrice_sp> Hi persia :-) | |
| [05:57] <slangasek> LaserJock: it means "threads". If it hangs there, it means "thread error". | |
| [05:57] <slangasek> LaserJock: if it's for a process you just attached to, it means "strace sucks" | |
| [05:57] <slangasek> s/strace/ptrace/ | |
| [05:58] <LaserJock> slangasek: ok, thanks | |
| [07:10] <dholbach> good morning | |
| [07:15] <ajmitch> hi | |
| [07:17] <dholbach> hi ajmitch | |
| [07:24] <iulian> Hey dholbach :) | |
| [07:24] <dholbach> hi iulian | |
| [08:08] <didrocks> good morning | |
| [09:17] <geser> Hi dholbach, didrocks | |
| [09:35] <Woody86> Hello everybody :) | |
| [09:36] * Hobbsee waves | |
| [09:37] * Woody86 high-fives Hobbsee | |
| [09:37] <Woody86> so what's everybody up to, sleeping or something?? | |
| [09:38] <Hobbsee> probably | |
| [09:40] <directhex> the sleep of the just | |
| [09:41] <geser> Hi Hobbsee | |
| [09:41] <Hobbsee> hey geser! | |
| [10:29] <james_w> bug 287369 | |
| [10:29] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 287369 in gambas2 "[Intrepid] Gambas2 now works on amd64 platform" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/287369 | |
| [10:29] <james_w> how do we go about that? | |
| [10:29] <james_w> A rebuild? | |
| [10:38] <porthose> Woody86: Congrats! You have a mentor. I am sending you an email with your mentors contact info :) | |
| === asac__ is now known as asac | |
| [11:26] <highvoltage> what does cdbs stand for? | |
| [11:26] <cody-somerville> common debian build system I believe | |
| [11:29] <ScottK> james_w: Yes. | |
| [11:29] <james_w> ScottK: excuse me? | |
| [11:29] <viviersf> highvoltage, jou noobie :P | |
| [11:30] <ScottK> james_w: Rebuild gambas2 | |
| [11:31] <james_w> ScottK: aha, thanks. I forgot I had asked a question :-) | |
| [11:31] <james_w> So I should just push a build1? | |
| [11:32] <highvoltage> viviersf: I just couldn't remember what it stands for | |
| [11:32] <viviersf> highvoltage, just a joke :) | |
| [11:33] <DktrKranz> ScottK, james_w, probably I'm wrong, but wasn't 2.8 compatible with amd64? | |
| [11:33] <DktrKranz> gambas2 --^ | |
| [11:33] <james_w> The P-a-s commit message was "gambas2 2.1.0 and later have 64-bit support" | |
| [11:34] <DktrKranz> oh, so p-a-s is adjusted already? | |
| [11:34] <ScottK> DktrKranz: Yes. | |
| [11:34] <ScottK> So now we need a new upload to trigger a build for amd64 | |
| [11:34] <DktrKranz> and no amd64 builds? | |
| [11:35] <DktrKranz> I guess it's automatic, unless Arch: field does not include amd64 | |
| [11:35] <ScottK> No. You'd need a trigger | |
| [11:35] <ScottK> PAS overrides what's in the control file. | |
| [11:36] <DktrKranz> I was sure adjusting p-a-s would be enough, but I am probably wrong | |
| [11:36] <ScottK> I may be wrong, but I don't think soyuz automatically scans PAS looking for new stuff it can build. | |
| [11:38] <DktrKranz> lamont told me soyuz needs 12 to 24 hours to notice p-a-s changes | |
| [11:38] <DktrKranz> if no builds since then, you're right | |
| [11:38] <ScottK> DktrKranz: Well if lamont told you, then I believe him over my guesses. | |
| [11:39] <DktrKranz> when such changes have been committed to p-a-s? | |
| [11:39] <DktrKranz> (no browser handy, sorry) | |
| [11:40] <james_w> 20th apparently | |
| [12:05] <james_w> it will not be automatic, but a buildd admin may have some magic apparently | |
| [12:05] <james_w> we are advised to upload a no-change rebuild, as that is sure to work | |
| [12:05] <james_w> which I have just done | |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | |
| [13:06] <james_w> The gambas2 issue was fixed by the soyuz devs waving a magic wand | |
| [13:08] <Hobbsee> hurrah! | |
| === txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger | |
| [13:17] <lfaraone> Anybody have a spare intrepid box they don't mind giving a ssh account to? | |
| [13:17] <jorgenpt> lfaraone: virtualbox it. | |
| [13:19] <lfaraone> jorgenpt: I don't have root access to the local machine, so I can't install VMs. | |
| [15:13] * RainCT points to http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/14689/ | |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | |
| [15:53] <jcastro> \sh: would you be interested in running a leonov session for openweek? | |
| [15:54] <\sh> jcastro: when is it? | |
| [15:54] <jcastro> 3 Nov to 7 Nov | |
| [15:54] <jcastro> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuOpenWeek/Prep | |
| [15:54] <jcastro> prep page if you want to add a session | |
| [15:55] <jcastro> actually, that goes for any MOTU who wants to run a session | |
| [15:55] <\sh> jcastro: I would love too...but I'm on the road during this week...from 3rd (Monday) to Sunday :( | |
| [15:55] <jcastro> :-/ | |
| [15:55] <\sh> jcastro: on the road means: I'm working @ our DC during nightimes, which means sleeping time is during the day | |
| [16:04] <nxvl> \sh: maybe you can send someone from your team to run a session | |
| [16:05] <\sh> nxvl: good idea...trying to catch thekorn ;) | |
| [16:29] <thekorn> \sh: very late pong | |
| [16:36] <\sh> thekorn: would you like to run a leonov session during openweek? | |
| [16:36] <\sh> thekorn: I'm somehow busy work related (working nightshifts in our DCs) | |
| [16:37] * \sh is brb ... 15 mins | |
| [16:37] <thekorn> \sh: I'll think about it tonight, off for sport right now, let's discuss it in #leonov | |
| === slicer_ is now known as slicer | |
| === k00n is now known as Koon | |
| [17:38] <ScottK> persia: I'd be curious to know if "Discussion of the MC application processes." included review of the feedback from some tech board members? | |
| [17:39] <persia> ScottK, No. It wasn't about criteria. More about the fact that it *shouldn't* take months to process an application. Applicants should get approved or denied. | |
| [17:40] <persia> The comments from the tech board are interesting, and I am anxiously awaiting mdz to start the thread asking MOTU to define ourselves. | |
| [17:40] <ScottK> persia: Thanks. I'd like to suggest that the TB comments should be discussed. | |
| [17:40] <persia> I don't think they should be discussed within MC. I think mdz is correct that it's a wider thing, and should be discussed within MOTU. | |
| [17:41] <persia> MC should take guidance from MOTU when determining the appropriate criteria. | |
| [17:41] <ScottK> OK. I guess I took it as MC is acting as a TB delegate on such decisions and so that's where MC should look. | |
| [17:42] <persia> I agree with that : that's why I asked for clarification in the TB meeting. | |
| [17:42] <persia> On the other hand, if TB seeks input from MOTU, I don't think the MC should be the sole source of that input, and I'm not sure it's productive for MC to establish a separate consensus from that of MOTU generally. | |
| [17:44] <persia> To me, it seems clear that some members of TB consider MOTU to be independent of universe. I thought that the statements by the TB were clear, but do not object to TB polling MOTU if they think that is the appropriate solution. | |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | |
| [17:46] <persia> ScottK, Of particular note are the comments by a majority of TB at 16:03 (from irclogs.u.c) which seem to establish a consensus, and mdz's comment from 16:06. | |
| [17:47] <persia> I interpret 16:06 as overriding the previous consensus of 16:03. | |
| [17:47] <ScottK> Looking | |
| [17:49] <ScottK> persia: I agree that where we are now is waiting for mdz to complete his action. | |
| [17:49] <persia> As I stated at the time, I'm happy to go with 16:03, although it doesn't match my gut feeling. On the other hand, I think completing the previous incomplete discussion has value, especially considering that many of the most prolific contributors in intrepid are not MOTU, and have not applied to be MOTU. | |
| [17:50] <ScottK> Additionally, if you go with what keybuck said at 16:06, then for people who only want to upload to Main, there is no path to core-dev. | |
| [17:50] <persia> ScottK, Do you also agree that the discussion would benefit from a larger group than just MC? | |
| [17:50] <ScottK> persia: Yes. | |
| [17:51] <persia> ScottK, Yeah. Keybuk's 16:06 comment confuses me, especially given his previous support for ArchiveReorganisation, which seems to be a mechanism to establish just that. | |
| [17:52] <RainCT> porthose: ping | |
| [17:52] <persia> Further, rtg is a counter-case to that statement : in at least one case there is someone with ACL upload rights to main who does not have upload rights to the rest of the archive. | |
| [17:54] <ScottK> Yes. | |
| [17:55] <ScottK> It seems the major distinction between him and (I'm blanking on the name) the emacs-snapshot case is insider versus outsider and I don't think that's a good way to decide. | |
| [17:56] <persia> I think you're thinking of the ltsp stuff, rather then emacs-snapshot. | |
| [17:57] <persia> for emacs-snapshot, I think the problem is our sponsoring process. For rus-ispell/xserver-xorg-video-nsc I think the problem is our SRU process. | |
| [17:58] <persia> Both of those need lower latency, and special casing doesn't help that much. There are exceptional cases (and emacs-snapshot may be one), but there are also core concerns. | |
| [17:58] <ScottK> Perhaps. | |
| [17:59] <persia> For ltsp, there's a clear need for a known active ubuntu member to upload only a small set of packages, and that individual has little interest in upload access to the rest of the archive. | |
| [18:00] <persia> To me, having that person jump through the hoop of being MOTU seems odd, especially given their leadership in other areas, but that needs discussion. | |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | |
| === mathiaz_ is now known as mathiaz | |
| [18:07] <persia> jcastro, Just signed up for Open Week : I'll take the 15:00 Wednesday slot to discuss "Polishing a package" meaning review the bugs, grab any available fixes, and submit a candidate for review. | |
| [18:08] <jcastro> persia: sounds excellent. | |
| [18:13] <jcastro> persia: please don't forget a description at the bottom! | |
| [18:13] <persia> Erps. Thanks :) | |
| [18:47] * RainCT notes that REVU is going down for maintenance | |
| [18:48] <sebner> RainCT: yeah, time to b0rk something :D# | |
| [18:48] <RainCT> sebner: yep, REVU has been working fine for too long already :D | |
| [18:49] <sebner> \o/ | |
| [18:50] <RainCT> (is any psql wizard around?) | |
| [18:50] <sebner> RainCT: fixed your gnome? (though my theorie is that gnome is unfixable and because of that just GREAT) :D | |
| [18:50] <RainCT> sebner: nope | |
| [18:50] <RainCT> still freezing :( | |
| [18:51] <sebner> RainCT: bah, be b0rken is one thing but freezing is just crap :\ | |
| [18:51] <RainCT> well, it's not normal freezing: it freezes the whole computer at startup and I have to hard-reboot :/ | |
| [18:59] <fabrice_sp> RainCT: I have the same problem. In my case, It seems that it's during network connection with wifi | |
| [19:03] <Awsoonn> is ther a way to put data on the clipboard from a bash script? | |
| [19:03] <RainCT> fabrice_sp: oh. but I've no wifi here | |
| [19:03] <cody-somerville> yup | |
| [19:03] <RainCT> Awsoonn: yes | |
| [19:04] * Awsoonn smiles @ RainCT do you happen to have an example? | |
| [19:04] <fabrice_sp> So, ho do you debug this kind of thing (freeze on startup, with hard reboot)? I tried to boot from another partition, but no strange messages in logs... | |
| [19:04] <RainCT> Awsoonn: look at xsel | |
| [19:04] <RainCT> (I had to look it up, didn't remember the name :)) | |
| [19:05] <RainCT> fabrice_sp: I don't know :) | |
| [19:05] <Awsoonn> so cool, thanks RainCT, I found some good stuff to read on it | |
| [19:05] <RainCT> Awsoonn: you're welcome :) | |
| [19:18] <pochu> sebner: btw, does amule need a FFe? I thought 2.2.1->2.2.2 was bugfix only | |
| [19:22] <RainCT> he first to get a traceback on REVU gets a prize :P | |
| [19:22] <RainCT> *the | |
| [19:22] <persia> RainCT, What's the prize? | |
| [19:23] <RainCT> dunno.. an image of a cake? XD | |
| [19:24] <persia> Not worth hitting it with a pentest then :) | |
| [19:24] <RainCT> porthose: you've got moderator status now :) | |
| [19:25] <RainCT> heh | |
| [19:25] <RainCT> persia: well, it's basically just trying that all the stuff (post comments, delete comments, advocate, etc.) still works | |
| [19:26] <iulian> RainCT: Do you still have that biscuit? | |
| [19:26] <RainCT> iulian: yeah! XD | |
| [19:26] <iulian> I'm in then! | |
| [19:28] <sebner> pochu: Good question. ScottK told me "Make a FFe for amule". I'll quickly recheck and decide then what todo. | |
| [19:30] <sebner> pochu: This is a stable release which features mainly bug fixes and improvements upon the 2.2.x series of aMule. | |
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | |
| [19:33] <RainCT> Jazzva: have you uploaded iceweasel-itsalltext or should I do? | |
| [19:33] <Jazzva> RainCT, I'm not a MOTU. Please do it. Thanks :) | |
| [19:33] <Awsoonn> RainCT: xsel seems pretty cool, but after about 10 minutes I realized I'm logged in via ssh and I was beign silly. | |
| [19:50] <RainCT> iulian: no luck? :) | |
| [20:17] <ScottK> RainCT and Jazzva: I got it accepted this time, but renaming packages and as a result stuffing them into the New queue really isn't a great idea this close to release. | |
| [20:17] <sebner> ScottK: pingeling :) | |
| [20:18] <ScottK> sebner: Pong | |
| [20:18] <sebner> ScottK: I'm wondering if we really need a FFe for amule | |
| [20:19] <ScottK> sebner: Perhaps not. | |
| [20:19] <ScottK> It's been some time since I looked at it. | |
| [20:19] <sebner> ScottK: depending on how strict we are. 99% are bugfixes and the remaining 1% are minor minor new things | |
| [20:19] <ScottK> sebner: At this point make the FFe then. | |
| [20:20] <sebner> ScottK: kk, just wanted to recheck with you | |
| [20:20] <ScottK> sebner: I have to justify accepts to ubuntu-release, so it'll help. | |
| === lionel_ is now known as lionel | |
| [20:20] <sebner> ScottK: I see. Not long than 30 minutes then it'll be ready to ACK | |
| [20:21] <ScottK> Great | |
| [20:27] <ScottK> sebner: Does the ssmtp bug apply to earlier releases too? | |
| [20:28] <sebner> ScottK: yep, /me will prepare SRU's the next days | |
| === jono_ is now known as jono | |
| [20:30] <sebner> ScottK: btw, /me is still impressed how long amule takes to build ^^ | |
| [20:36] <Woody86> hello everybody :) | |
| [20:41] <ScottK> sebner: It won't be SRU, it'll be -security, won't it? | |
| [20:42] <sebner> ScottK: of course but Stable release update is nearly the same for me since it's an update or a stable release. security or not ^^ | |
| [20:42] <sebner> *or = for | |
| [20:42] <ScottK> OK. | |
| [20:42] <ScottK> sebner: Is it all the releases affected? | |
| [20:43] <sebner> ScottK: unfortunately yes, back to dapper | |
| [20:43] <ScottK> OK | |
| [20:44] <sebner> ScottK: ha! me is still in time. 6 minutes left =) | |
| [20:44] <Woody86> ember - hello :) | |
| [20:44] <ScottK> sebner: Looks like nxvl is beating you too it. | |
| [20:44] <ScottK> too/to | |
| [20:44] <slytherin> james_w: I have just updated attachment for bug #268930, are you planning to sponsor it (since you added the comment about dependencies) or should I ask someone else? | |
| [20:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 268930 in fop "FOP fails with java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.w3c.dom.svg.SVGDocument" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/268930 | |
| [20:45] <sebner> ScottK: why? It was my decision to make SRU's ;) | |
| [20:45] <ScottK> sebner: I see one debdiff in the bug already from him. | |
| [20:46] <sebner> ScottK: true because he thought my changelog was not made in the correct way but it was (expect the versionsnumber) | |
| [20:47] <ScottK> Ah. | |
| [20:47] <sebner> *exept | |
| [20:47] <sebner> *except | |
| [20:47] <sebner> grrr | |
| [20:49] <slytherin> geser: there? | |
| [20:58] <sebner> ScottK: grr, damn icq. ready now :) | |
| === DktrKranz2 is now known as DktrKranz | |
| [21:04] <ScottK> sebner: Bug #? | |
| [21:04] <sebner> ScottK: bug #260471 , DO something. They stole my ssmtp SRU's :( :( :( | |
| [21:04] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 260471 in amule "[FFe] Merge amule (2.2.2-1) experimental" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/260471 | |
| [21:05] <ScottK> sebner: Why do we need replaces amule-common? | |
| [21:06] <sebner> ScottK: I talked to pochu (last uploader). because in our svn version we had stuff there what was moved to amule to reduce the debian delta | |
| [21:07] <ScottK> sebner: In what release did amule-common last exist? | |
| [21:07] <ScottK> As a real package, not virtual. | |
| [21:07] <pochu> ScottK: if you remove it, it will break upgrades | |
| [21:08] <pochu> amule-common is a real package | |
| [21:08] <sebner> ScottK: webserver stuff | |
| [21:08] <pochu> it's a replaces because some files where moved from amule-common to amule | |
| [21:08] <ScottK> When? | |
| [21:09] <sebner> ScottK: our svn version -> debian resync | |
| [21:09] <pochu> ScottK: in hardy it's in amule-common | |
| [21:09] <ScottK> pochu: OK. It's needed then. | |
| [21:09] <ScottK> Thanks. | |
| [21:10] <pochu> I can ask dato to add it to the Debian package, so we can sync in the future | |
| [21:10] <sebner> pochu: sync \o/ :) I'll file it then :P | |
| [21:11] <sebner> ScottK: are you happy that I made a screenshot? Bonus points? ^ ^ | |
| [21:11] <ajmitch> hi | |
| [21:14] <ScottK> sebner: Ack'ed. | |
| [21:14] * sebner hugs ScottK =) | |
| [21:14] <ScottK> DktrKranz: Would you have a look at bug #260471 | |
| [21:14] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 260471 in amule "[FFe] Merge amule (2.2.2-1) experimental" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/260471 | |
| [21:15] <sebner> ScottK: It is possible. <--- HAHA :) | |
| [21:15] <ScottK> It's not there yet. | |
| [21:15] <pochu> sebner: btw, tango icons look nicer ;) | |
| [21:16] * DktrKranz looks | |
| [21:16] <pochu> sebner: switch to them in preferences :) | |
| [21:16] <sebner> pochu: lol | |
| [21:16] <pochu> sebner: feel free to subscribe to amule bugs, it's low traffic lol :P | |
| [21:16] <sebner> pochu: hehe | |
| [21:17] <ScottK> jdong: You around? I've got a backports policy question. | |
| [21:18] <sebner> pochu: tango = tangerine? ^^ | |
| [21:19] <pochu> sebner: dato is committing the replaces bit to git | |
| [21:19] <pochu> will be available in the next upload | |
| [21:19] <DktrKranz> sebner, ScottK: fine for me too. | |
| [21:19] <sebner> pochu: great. /me is already keen to sync stuff for jaunty :D | |
| [21:19] <sebner> DktrKranz: thanks ;D | |
| [21:19] <pochu> hehe | |
| [21:20] <DktrKranz> sebner, now get superpowers and upload it yourself, Y.R.B. | |
| [21:20] <sebner> pochu: DktrKranz : I still need a sponsors ACK | |
| [21:20] <sebner> DktrKranz: S. I. K. Y. , Not enough time to be added to the group :P | |
| [21:21] <DktrKranz> please grant sebner a MCe (MOTU Council exception) | |
| [21:21] <sebner> ROFL | |
| [21:22] <sebner> DktrKranz: What about a Se? Sebner expection ^^ | |
| [21:22] <DktrKranz> sebner, I don't like the name | |
| [21:23] <sebner> bah :P | |
| [21:24] <ScottK> pochu: Would you do the amule upload? | |
| [21:25] <DktrKranz> pochu, if you lack time, I could have a look later | |
| [21:25] <DktrKranz> (but not too sure about it) | |
| [21:25] * pochu doesn't have where to test ATM | |
| [21:25] <pochu> so if you can, that would be great | |
| [21:26] <pochu> sebner: what about applying for MOTUship? | |
| [21:26] <DktrKranz> well... my ISP is blocking amule connections, so I can test if it builds and installs only | |
| [21:26] <sebner> pochu: why? | |
| [21:26] <sebner> DktrKranz: what about my nice picture :P | |
| [21:26] <DktrKranz> sebner, we are *scared* of your future sync/merge requests for jauntyu | |
| [21:27] <pochu> sebner: to not need sponsors ;) | |
| [21:27] <sebner> pochu: hehe, at least forget it for intrepid cycle (not that long though ^^) | |
| [21:27] <sebner> DktrKranz: YOU or the archive admins? ^^ | |
| [21:27] <pochu> haha | |
| [21:28] <DktrKranz> sebner, they don't get queried | |
| [21:28] <DktrKranz> as you do with me :D | |
| [21:28] <pochu> lol | |
| [21:28] * sebner hides | |
| [21:28] * pochu goes to study | |
| [21:28] <sebner> pochu: hf if possible ^^ | |
| [21:29] <DktrKranz> sebner, no hideout for you, I know them all | |
| [21:29] <pochu> boson - core package for Boson | |
| [21:29] <pochu> lol at the description | |
| [21:29] <pochu> bbl | |
| [21:29] <DktrKranz> pochu, what about "boson - boson, what else you need to know?" | |
| [21:30] <DktrKranz> gah, my i386 debomatic machine is down, so I need to push it to PPA to have it tested :/ | |
| [21:33] <DktrKranz> sebner, are you able to open packages.u.c ? | |
| [21:33] * DktrKranz not | |
| [21:33] <sebner> DktrKranz: yep, b0rken. was working some hours ago though | |
| [21:34] * DktrKranz hopes in rmadison now | |
| [21:34] <sebner> DktrKranz: rmadison? | |
| [21:35] <DktrKranz> rmadison -u ubuntu amule-common | |
| [21:36] * sebner learns everyday something new =) | |
| [21:36] <ScottK> DktrKranz: Did that one a while ago http://paste.ubuntu.com/61197/ | |
| [21:36] <ScottK> DktrKranz: BTW, -u ubuntu is default now. | |
| [21:36] <sebner> hrhr | |
| [21:37] <sebner> ScottK: what wlan do you have? | |
| [21:37] <ScottK> What do you mean? | |
| [21:37] <DktrKranz> ScottK, ah... need to adjust my aliases then | |
| [21:37] <sebner> ScottK: wlancard | |
| [21:37] <sebner> ScottK: ah sry, ignore me | |
| [21:38] <pkern> Sadly Debian's rmadison doesn't know about -u. | |
| [21:38] <ScottK> Ah. I'm on a desktop here, but my laptop is intel 4965 | |
| [21:38] <DktrKranz> pkern, really? | |
| [21:39] <sebner> ScottK: he missread something. I thought you didn't use intrepid earlier because of br0ken wlan support. But it's about kde and nm | |
| [21:40] <ScottK> sebner: Yes. That was fixed around beta time. | |
| [21:40] <sebner> ScottK: he = me xD | |
| [21:40] <ScottK> It was due to NetworkManager 0.7 getting uploaded before KNetworkManager had been updated to the new API. | |
| [21:40] <sebner> ScottK: using unstable isn't that bad. AFAIK xorg only broke 2 times. Ok, Nvidia around 10 times but that's not necessary for life ^^ | |
| [21:41] <ScottK> sebner: It's one thing if you are a student. It's another when you need these boxes for $WORK. | |
| [21:41] <DktrKranz> sebner, testbuilding amule right now | |
| [21:42] <sebner> ScottK: a student also has to use them. ok work is different but 1 or 2 days with broken Xorg in 6 months is pretty good :D | |
| [21:42] <sebner> DktrKranz: \o/ | |
| [21:42] <ScottK> Yes, but you know that after, not before. | |
| [21:42] <sebner> ScottK: to make it more funny /me only has *1* box/laptop | |
| [21:43] <DktrKranz> sebner, I hope it will bypass my ISP filters, or borrow me some free internet, please | |
| [21:43] <sebner> DktrKranz: letter is already on his way :P | |
| [21:43] * DktrKranz is angry when a State decide to block *illegal* peer-to-peer traffic | |
| [21:43] <sebner> hrhr | |
| [21:43] <DktrKranz> where "illegal" = "I need to test if something works" | |
| [21:43] <sebner> DktrKranz: proxies doesn't work? | |
| [21:43] <pkern> DktrKranz: rly | |
| [21:46] <sebner> DktrKranz: amule takes pretty long to build :\ | |
| [21:46] <DktrKranz> how long? | |
| [21:47] <sebner> DktrKranz: /here 5-10 minutes | |
| [21:47] <sebner> DktrKranz: more likely around 10 ^^ | |
| [21:47] <DktrKranz> not too bad, I uploaded to PPA | |
| [21:48] <DktrKranz> since my i386 box is out of business for now | |
| [21:48] <sebner> DktrKranz: well for a small desktop app it's pretty long :\ | |
| [21:48] <DktrKranz> Finished: 2008-07-01 (took 24 minutes) | |
| [21:48] <DktrKranz> porc... | |
| [21:49] <sebner> hehe | |
| [22:34] <pochu> sebner: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/amule.git;a=commitdiff;h=73d577f5b4c7bc0d8d9add33b429eb6881fc6db4 | |
| [22:43] <DktrKranz> mh, my PPA builds have stalled... | |