| [00:59] * PrivateVoid waves to everyone | |
| === BaD-CrC is now known as BaD-Laptop | |
| [07:58] <FD_F> Hello i want start testing packages can anyone give me start point ? | |
| === mdz_ is now known as mdz | |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | |
| [12:29] <heno> does anyone know how to connect to a kvm instance running on a remote machine with -vnc? | |
| [12:30] <mathiaz> heno: you need to get the vnc port and then point your vnc client to the vm_host_ip:vnc_port | |
| [12:30] <mathiaz> heno: the default port is 5900 | |
| [12:31] <mathiaz> heno: I usually use: vinagre vm_host_ip:5900 | |
| [12:38] <heno> mathiaz: right, that was my guess too, but it doesn't work :( I can vnc into the desktop of the machine (isis:5900) itself from this box (hp) but not into the kvm session running on isis:5901. I can reach the kvm from isis itself though at localhost:5901 | |
| [12:38] <mathiaz> heno: is the vnc client listening on all the ip or the just localhost? | |
| [12:39] <mathiaz> heno: there may be a firewall in between also | |
| [12:39] <mathiaz> heno: what I usually do is to do local port forwarding with an an ssh client | |
| [12:42] <heno> mathiaz: I don't know where it's listening, but the vnc session made by the normal vnc-server comes through just fine. The machines are both under my desk and there are no firewalls running on either AFAICT | |
| [12:43] <heno> I can try port forwarding | |
| [12:43] <mathiaz> heno: kvm -vnc may only listen on localhost by default | |
| [12:46] <mathiaz> heno: you may wanna try starting the kvm process with -vnc 0.0.0.0:5901 | |
| [12:47] <heno> mathiaz: actually '0.0.0.0' or the IP of he machine? (is it an IP mask?) | |
| [12:48] <mathiaz> heno: the ip is the list of host that are allowed to connect to the vnc server | |
| [12:48] <mathiaz> heno: 0.0.0.0 means - anyone can connect to the vnc server | |
| [12:52] <heno> mathiaz: no luck. with that it won't connect from the local machine either. Nor does -vnc actual-ip:5901 work | |
| [12:54] <mathiaz> heno: hm - what does netstat on the vm host says when kvm is started? | |
| [12:55] <mathiaz> heno: it seems that local port fowarding is the other option you have | |
| [12:58] <heno> netstat says it's listening to 5900 (regular vnc-server) but not 5901 (kvm) | |
| [12:58] <heno> mathiaz: is 'ssh -L 5902:proxy:5902 henrik@isis-ip the command I should use? | |
| [12:59] <heno> where isis is the machine kvm is running | |
| [13:00] <stgraber> heno: vncviewer -via henrik@isis-ip localhost::5902 | |
| [13:00] <mathiaz> heno: hm - the problem is that 5901 isn't opened | |
| [13:00] <mathiaz> heno: so it seems that kvm isn't running a vnc server at all | |
| [13:01] <mathiaz> heno: are you using kvm directly or libvirt to manage your vm guests? | |
| [13:05] <heno> mathiaz: I'm running it directly. I think it's running a server because it works fine on the local machine. Port forwarding worked btw, thanks! | |
| === davmor2 is now known as davmor2_lunch | |
| [13:08] <heno> now I just need to get it working in vinagre | |
| [13:23] <ara> morning all :-) | |
| [13:47] <heno> morning ara! | |
| [13:47] <ara> morning heno :-) | |
| === davmor2_lunch is now known as davmor2 | |
| [14:22] <heno> testing on hardware of bug 246269 would be appreciated | |
| [14:23] <heno> boot with the option vga=792 set in grub | |
| [14:33] <persia> stgraber, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases updated. Is that what you wanted, or are you looking for something different? | |
| [14:34] * persia fixes a copy & paste error | |
| [14:36] <stgraber> persia: well, that's only one testcase but I guess in your case it covers everything (you don't have different ways of installing, do you ?) so that should be good | |
| [14:37] <persia> stgraber, That's really all we wanted. The main goal is to make sure that some humans have actually looked at the images and that we can select a known-good-image for beta, RC, etc. | |
| [14:38] <persia> Things working would be neat, but the basic image and install tests most of the essential bits. | |
| [14:38] <persia> And no, there's no alternate CD. | |
| [14:48] <persia> stgraber, Also, how would it impact you to remove the "Mobile Testing" section from w.u.c/Testing/Cases ? As I understand it, those are out of date and not maintained. | |
| [14:49] <persia> The pages themselves are probably interesting to be resurrected at some point : they just aren't a current set of tests. | |
| [15:06] * heno is away for a bit | |
| [15:13] <PrivateVoid> anyone having any success with getting intrepid's flash to work with ustream.tv or 12seconds.tv? | |
| [15:14] <PrivateVoid> I got discon after asking... so here goes the questions again... sorry for the duplicate | |
| [15:14] <PrivateVoid> anyone having any success with getting intrepid's flash to work with ustream.tv or 12seconds.tv? | |
| [15:15] <persia> PrivateVoid, Which flash do you have installed? | |
| [15:15] <PrivateVoid> the one from the repos -- I believe it is version 10 | |
| [15:16] <persia> Well, I suspect you have flashplugin-nonfree. Some people find adobe-flashplugin works differently. I don't use either, so I'm just guessing. | |
| [15:32] <liw> is ISO testing going on? or not yet? | |
| [15:33] <davmor2> not yet | |
| [15:33] <liw> ook, then I'll return later | |
| [15:33] <persia> Doesn't that usually start after the tuesday builds (so ~ 3:00 UTC, or in ~ 12 hours) | |
| [15:34] <davmor2> persia: we were hoping to get in early so we could get better testing coverage under less pressure, but it was not to be :) | |
| [15:36] <persia> davmor2, Yeah : you would have had to prep the developers, as there were too many changes today. | |
| [15:37] <davmor2> persia: I think heno sent out a mail to those lines :) | |
| [15:37] <persia> Oh. I haven't seen it yet. I did see a lot of changes, so I suspect others haven't seen it either. | |
| [15:37] <davmor2> ce la vie anyway :) | |
| [15:38] <persia> changes to core things like the installer too :) | |
| [15:38] <davmor2> persia: I know that's why I'm waiting on the email to say I can start testing for real :) | |
| [15:39] <davmor2> oh and tested upgrade on my main machine too :) | |
| [15:40] <PrivateVoid> yes... I have non-free persia... | |
| [15:40] <PrivateVoid> there is an adobe-flashplugin in the repos for 64bit? | |
| [15:41] <davmor2> persia: I have adobe installed too | |
| [15:42] <PrivateVoid> davmor2 - my issue with adobe is that streaming does not function when I try to broadcast on ustream.tv or 12seconds.tv | |
| [15:42] <davmor2> Pass | |
| [15:42] <PrivateVoid> it works fine under 8.04 and flashplugin-nonfree | |
| [15:43] <PrivateVoid> but with 8.10 and the Adobe 10 version of flashplugin-nonfree it does not... | |
| [15:43] <PrivateVoid> but if there is a different option as persia said then I will try that when I get hom tonight | |
| [15:43] <PrivateVoid> the rest of flash 10 works better... no more menus going under images, etc. | |
| [16:15] <ara> have you noticed lately that apport gives "wrong" close messages? like "firefox closed unexpectely" and alike, that are not true? | |
| [16:15] <persia> ara, Are you sure they aren't true? Maybe it crashed when closing when you logged out last time? | |
| [16:16] <ara> persia: i just tried that in a fresh installed intrepid | |
| [16:17] <persia> ara, So you got that message when firefox had *never* run? | |
| [16:18] <ara> persia: yes, I think so. I will double check that, though | |
| [16:19] <persia> ara, Please file that bug before you do : I'm *really* curious to see what crashed. | |
| [16:19] <persia> (as apport is surely reacting to *something* in /var/crash | |
| [16:19] <ara> persia: ok, will do | |
| [16:20] <davmor2> I don't have it here | |
| [16:22] <persia> davmor2, Which is precisely the interesting bit :) Luckily, apport should show us exactly what crashed. Whether we care is an entirely different matter. | |
| [16:22] <davmor2> :) | |
| [16:24] <ara> persia: I cannot report, as it is so freshly installed intrepid, that it needed to get updates. If it happens again after the update, I will report again | |
| [16:26] <persia> ara, Why can't you report it? apport doesn't let you? | |
| [16:26] <persia> ara, Really, I'm only curious how firefox got started if you say it didn't start, and the apport data was the easiest way to check. | |
| [17:27] <sbeattie> persia: if she was trying to report something else via apport and firefox crashed... | |
| [17:32] * ara -> lunch | |
| [17:32] <persia> sbeattie, Exactly. That's why I was curious. Anything apport reports should be true, although it may be confused. | |
| [17:33] <sbeattie> right, but its a bit problematic if firefox's configuration is hosed enough that it fails on every restart... | |
| [17:35] <persia> Or even just the first restart after an install. That's why I wanted the apport report, rather than waiting for upgrade, and seeing if it still happens. While it might not need fixing, it at least shows what crashed, and maybe why. | |
| [18:35] <kryptomorf> I am trying to install ubuntu 8.10 beta on an acer machine, but there is some trouble loading gdm, is this something the testing team is interested in? | |
| [19:16] <ara> kryptomorf: do you get the live cd up and running? | |
| [19:28] <kryptomorf> no thats the problem | |
| [19:37] <heno> kryptomorf: could you try the latest daily image? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ | |
| [19:39] <kryptomorf> sure | |
| [19:40] <heno> (the 32-bit one is slightly over-sized) | |
| [19:42] <kryptomorf> yes I see, ill see if I can find an empty DVD | |
| [20:15] <slangasek> first RC test images up | |
| [20:15] <slangasek> will definitely have some rerolls yet, I already know of at least one critical bug on them | |
| [20:17] <kryptomorf> heno: i have tested with the daily image, and its still the the same - gdm crashed and ubuntu drops to some tty | |
| [20:34] * afflux grabs alternate-amd64 | |
| [20:42] <mathiaz> stgraber: It seems that the list of test cases on the qa tracker hasn't been updated with the latest version of the ServerInstall wiki page | |
| [20:42] <mathiaz> stgraber: tests have been added to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases/ServerInstall | |
| [20:43] <mathiaz> stgraber: and they haven't been added to the qa tracker. | |
| [21:30] <stgraber> mathiaz: yeah, I know. I have the new Ubuntu mobile one only since this morning, I'll be updating them tonight and ping a sysadmin to do the SQL update. | |
| [22:43] <stgraber> mathiaz: around ? | |
| [22:43] <stgraber> mathiaz: you added the JeOS testcase, we currently have a separate image with that testcase on the tracker is this one obsolete ? | |
| [22:44] <mathiaz> stgraber: you can remove the JeOS images | |
| [22:44] <stgraber> ok | |
| [22:44] <mathiaz> stgraber: as of intrepid JeOS is part of the -server iso and not an separate iso anymore | |
| [22:44] <stgraber> ok, and these JeOS testcases are for both amd64 and i386 ? | |
| [22:44] <stgraber> (the previous JeOS was i386 only) | |
| [22:53] <stgraber> mathiaz: ^ | |
| [22:54] <mathiaz> stgraber: yes - both amd64 and i386 are supported | |
| [22:54] <stgraber> ok | |
| [22:56] <stgraber> persia: ping | |
| [22:56] <stgraber> persia: Ubuntu Mobile and Ubuntu MID, what arch is that ? | |
| [22:58] <stgraber> lpia ? | |
| [23:00] <stgraber> hmm, that doesn't really matter in fact as there is only one image anyway, I'll just not specify an architecture | |