| [00:07] <sistpoty> aaaaahhh... all my mail seems to be gone | |
| [00:08] <sistpoty> dear kmail, please don't shock me like this, sincerely yours, stefan. | |
| [00:14] <cyberix> If I send a patch for Hardy, should I send the patch for Intrepid too? | |
| [00:17] <persia> cyberix: The general rule is that nothing not fixed in intrepid will be uploaded to hardy. | |
| [00:17] <geser> cyberix: for an SRU? | |
| [00:17] <persia> To avoid confusion, I'd recommend putting both patches in the same bug. | |
| [00:18] <cyberix> no, just a small patch | |
| [00:18] <cyberix> Actually there is no use to ship this for Hardy | |
| [00:18] <persia> cyberix: Any change to hardy at this point is an SRU, even a just a 1-bit change | |
| [00:18] <cyberix> I'm just trying to understand how the processes work | |
| [00:18] <cyberix> k | |
| [00:19] <cyberix> so it is stable instead of source :-) | |
| [00:24] <geser> has someone an idea what went wrong during this build? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15562990/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.libgnupg-interface-perl_0.36-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | |
| [00:26] <sistpoty> geser: hm... "which gpg ... gpg (GnuPG) not found at Makefile.PL line 21." might give some clue? | |
| [00:27] <persia> sistpoty: But build-essential depends on dpkg-dev, which depends on gnupg | |
| [00:27] <sistpoty> persia: which doesn't mean that Makefile.PL is correct thought ;) | |
| [00:27] <persia> sistpoty: True. | |
| [00:28] <geser> sistpoty: it builds in my pbuilder | |
| [00:28] <sistpoty> geser: hm... strange | |
| [00:28] * persia tries in sbuild, to see if it is due to pbuilder-satisfybuilddepends | |
| [00:29] <sistpoty> persia, geser: oh, dpkg-dev doesn't b-d on gnupg | |
| [00:30] <persia> ! | |
| [00:30] <sistpoty> (at least not 1.14.20ubuntu1) | |
| [00:30] <persia> How did that become Suggests: ? That's rather unexpected. | |
| [00:30] <geser> but gnupg is installed (see the gpg signature check after the source is extracted) | |
| [00:31] <persia> No, that's just me reading apt-cache output wrong. | |
| [00:33] <persia> geser: There's something very odd: that buildlog also has "sh: gcc: not found" | |
| [00:33] <sistpoty> hm... dear kmail, don't disconnect me from the outside world, by not letting me receive mails from a local mbox. thanks. | |
| [00:33] <persia> Builds cleanly in my intrepid sbuild chroot. | |
| [00:34] <sistpoty> persia: hm... however it has: "Setting up g++-4.3 (4.3.1-1ubuntu2) ..." | |
| [00:34] <persia> sistpoty: Right, which is why I thought "sh: gcc: not found" was odd. | |
| [00:35] <persia> I find it especially odd right after "Toolchain package versions: ... gcc-4.3_4.3.1-1ubuntu2" | |
| [00:35] <geser> if I understand the Makefile.PL correnctly the second "gpg" in the line "which gpg ... gpg" should come from the system() call, right? | |
| [00:36] <persia> geser: Right. I would have expected "/usr/bin/gpg" | |
| [00:37] <persia> I think that system($gpg_find) is returning nothing, and the second gpg is coming from 'die "gpg (GnuPG) not found";' | |
| [00:38] <geser> yes, you are correct | |
| [00:38] <geser> perl -e "system('which gpg')" returns here /usr/bin/gpg | |
| [00:39] <persia> Looks like this was the first build since edgy. Maybe this is a case of someone hand-adjusting things. | |
| [00:39] <geser> persia: gcc-4.3 only provides /usr/bin/gcc-4.3, /usr/bin/gcc is in gcc but that's also installed | |
| [00:39] <persia> geser: Still, it's odd to see a report that gcc is not found. | |
| [00:40] <geser> true | |
| [00:40] <geser> someone messing with $PATH? | |
| [00:41] <persia> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3087635/buildlog_ubuntu-edgy-i386.libgnupg-interface-perl_0.33-6_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz looks rather different: Makefile.PL likely changed a bit upstream. | |
| [00:41] <persia> Could be the common situation with arch:all that the Debian build wasn't run in a sanitised chroot... | |
| [00:43] <geser> but why does the same source package build in my pbuilder and your sbuild but not on the buildd? | |
| [00:43] <persia> Do you have gnupg installed in your chroot? It seems to be in mine. | |
| [00:44] <bobbo> sistpoty: thanks for sponsoring my memaker upload :) | |
| [00:44] <sistpoty> bobbo: thanks for providing a debdiff in the fisrt place ;) | |
| [00:44] <bobbo> sistpoty: hehe, my pleasure | |
| [00:46] <geser> persia: I have, but how did dpkg-source (on the buildd) check the gpg signature without gnupg? (gpg: Signature made Tue Jun 24 07:31:19 2008 BST using DSA key ID 9725F63B) | |
| [00:46] * sistpoty goes to bed now... gn8 everyone | |
| [00:49] <geser> persia: the "sh: gcc: not found | |
| [00:49] <geser> " seems to be normal now | |
| [00:50] <geser> it's also in successfully build logs, e.g. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15590444/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.apache2_2.2.9-2ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz | |
| [00:51] <persia> That's very odd. Maybe the "gcc" package isn't installed, or poorly configured, or something. | |
| [00:53] <geser> "Setting up gcc (4:4.3.1-1ubuntu2) ..." seems ok to me | |
| [00:54] <persia> geser: I have to agree that gpg is installed. I don't know why "which gpg" wouldn't work. | |
| [00:54] <geser> persia: n8, I'll try to ask the buildd admins if they have an idea why libgnupg-interace-perl FTBFS (and also about the "sh: gcc: not found" thing) | |
| [00:54] <LaserJock> is anybody using sbuild+some apt cacher with both Debian and Ubuntu ? | |
| [00:54] * persia checks the default /bin/sh in the sbuild schroot | |
| [00:55] <persia> No, I seem to have dash, so that's not it. | |
| [00:55] * persia is baffled | |
| [00:56] <geser> persia: a reason why gcc and gpg are not found could be that /usr/bin is not in the PATH for some reason on the buildd | |
| [00:57] <persia> geser: Maybe, but why would it be able to call dpkg-source (also in /usr/bin)? | |
| [00:57] <persia> Further, dpkg-source checks for the existence of /usr/bin/gpg, but then calls gpg without a prefix path. | |
| [00:58] <persia> It's backticks rather than system(), but that oughtn't be sufficient to make it work or fail. | |
| [01:01] <geser> does it get called as "dpkg-source" or "/usr/bin/dpkg-source"? | |
| [01:02] <geser> hmm, dpkg-source calls gpg without the full path to do the signature check, so PATH seems to be ok | |
| [01:02] <persia> Right. | |
| [01:05] <geser> what about giving it back to the buildds and hope that it gets tried on a different buildd? | |
| [01:06] <persia> That's why they put the button there :) | |
| [01:11] <geser> nothing changed :( still FTBFS | |
| [01:12] * geser goes to bed now | |
| [01:13] <persia> geser: Sleep well. | |
| === macd_ is now known as macd | |
| === rockstar` is now known as rockstar | |
| [07:56] <RAOF> Hm. Gnome-do-plugins in Ubuntu has a do-plugins as its source package, but gnome-do-plugins in Debian has gnome-do-plugins as its source package. I'm rebasing the Ubuntu package on the Debian package; do I upload as gnome-do-plugins and ask for removal of do-plugins? | |
| [08:11] <wgrant> RAOF: Please... do. | |
| [08:12] <RAOF> wgrant: :P | |
| [08:16] <RAOF> wgrant: Do you know if I need to ask for the removal of do-plugins source before uploading gnome-do-plugins? Otherwise there'll be a binary package name conflict, and I'm not sure how those get dealt with. | |
| [08:16] <wgrant> RAOF: As long as the version is greater, it will be fine. | |
| [08:17] <wgrant> They'll go through binary NEW, but then dominate the old binaries, so your new ones won't be removed with the old source just because they have the same name.\ | |
| [08:24] <wgrant> Grmph. Why is Full Circle Magazine recommending Webmin? | |
| [08:24] <wgrant> And 'sudo su'? | |
| [08:36] <wgrant> Ehem, and they used a pre-Hardy interview... | |
| [08:38] <wgrant> And they recommend using Debian packages. Ew ew ew. | |
| [08:49] <Flannel> wgrant: Where? | |
| [08:50] <wgrant> Flannel: To which bit? | |
| [08:51] <\sh> moins | |
| [08:51] <Flannel> wgrant: Um, all of them if theyre convienent | |
| [08:51] <jpds> wgrant: I think you can find them lurking in #fullcirclemagazine ;-= | |
| [08:51] <jpds> moin \sh | |
| [08:51] <wgrant> jpds: Ah, perhaps. | |
| [08:51] <wgrant> Flannel: I glanced through the latest edition (#14). | |
| [08:52] <wgrant> They're fairly easy to find with any search functionality. | |
| [08:52] <Flannel> wgrant: Alright, thats all I needed to know | |
| [08:52] <Flannel> Didn't want to start from 0 | |
| [09:03] <Iulian> G'morning | |
| [12:07] <sistpoty> hi folks | |
| [12:11] <geser> hi sistpoty | |
| [12:12] <sistpoty> hi geser | |
| [12:12] <sistpoty> hm... last nights dist-upgrade with many kde parts getting upgraded left me with a gnome session... epic fail *g* | |
| [12:13] <geser> sistpoty: it's part of the hidden master plan to convert all kde users to gnome :) | |
| [12:13] <sistpoty> haha | |
| [12:14] <elky> i like the sound of this plan... | |
| [12:15] <RAOF> Hm. I'm just trying Intrepid KDE. Again. | |
| [12:16] <RAOF> Is the display settings panel _meant_ to do anything, or just look (not) pretty? :) | |
| [12:16] <jussi01> someone remind me of the build a .dsc command? | |
| [12:17] <RAOF> sbuild -d intrepid foo.dsc ? :) | |
| [12:17] <RAOF> On the other hand: dear GTK: please implement something like the smooth animation of the output list. | |
| [12:17] <jussi01> no, the dpkg one? | |
| [12:17] <RAOF> Is there one? | |
| [12:18] <jussi01> hrm... /me goes to google more | |
| [12:18] <RAOF> You dpkg-source -x it, then dpkg-buildpackage the extracted source. | |
| [12:18] <RAOF> (or debian/rules binary, if you're confident it's policy-compliant :)) | |
| [12:18] <jussi01> RAOF: ahh, yeah thats the one | |
| [12:19] <jussi01> RAOF: its just a personal thing, nothing for ubutnu atm. | |
| [12:19] <RAOF> Um. Why does Kubuntu default to playing a 'ding' every time I press a button? | |
| [12:29] <wgrant> RAOF: Because it's kool. | |
| [12:29] <RAOF> Gah! KDE is so easy to break! | |
| [12:30] <RAOF> I seem to have created a panel covering my entire second monitor. | |
| [12:31] <wgrant> Nice! | |
| [12:31] <wgrant> KDE4 or not? | |
| [12:33] <RAOF> Kwin now believes that maximise about 30x20 pixels in the top left corner, too. | |
| [12:33] <RAOF> KDE4 | |
| [12:35] <RAOF> Hm. It is apparently imperitive that I don't alt-tab, lest kwin consume 100% cpu and lock the desktop. | |
| [12:36] <persia> RAOF: Just use the panel on your second monitor to control which app you are using. That way you won't need the keyboard at all :) | |
| [12:37] <RAOF> The panel on my second monitor is entirely empty, and unresponsive to mouse clicks :) | |
| [12:38] <RAOF> Maybe it's not even a panel? Maybe something just decided to fill my second monitor with all black. | |
| === Kopfgeldjaeger2 is now known as Kopfgeldjaeger | |
| [12:39] <RAOF> Oooh, maximising works again! | |
| [12:42] <RAOF> I was going to spend some time using kde to file some bugs, but kubuntu appears to be composed entirely of bugs. I must be an expert kde-breaker. | |
| [12:42] <StevenK> "I'd file bugs, but maybe what I think are bugs are really features." | |
| [12:43] <persia> Everything in a feature, for the right use case... | |
| [12:43] <RAOF> The biggest "feature" seems to be semi-awareness of dual head. | |
| [12:43] <RAOF> It knows my laptop's running at 1680x1050, so the panel is 1680 wide. | |
| [12:44] <RAOF> However, when it started up my two monitors were cloned. Thus, the desktop is the size of the smaller of the two. | |
| [12:44] <RAOF> Sadly, this means that the left hand side of the panel, containing, among other things, the launcher, is offscreen. | |
| [12:44] <StevenK> Teehee | |
| [12:45] <RAOF> W.T.F? | |
| [12:45] * RAOF blinks again. | |
| [12:45] <persia> Right-justification is always correct :) | |
| [12:46] <RAOF> Pressing the "configure this panel" button (not labelled as such in any way, of course) brings up, among other things, 3 arrows. | |
| [12:46] <RAOF> In some as yet undiscovered way, these three arrows influence the size of the panel. | |
| [12:47] <StevenK> That sounds intutive. | |
| [12:47] <RAOF> As well as some left/centre/right justification boxes. | |
| [12:47] <RAOF> Also intuitively: selecting the text which is left justified causes the panel to be right justified on my right hand monitor. | |
| [12:48] <RAOF> Centre works as expected, but the right-justification button causes it to be right-justified on my left monitor. | |
| [12:51] <RAOF> Hm. How do I make the clock show 12h time? Hint: it doesn't involve right clicking on the clock, apparently. | |
| [12:52] <StevenK> RAOF: You switch to Ubuntu? | |
| [12:52] <RAOF> Entirely possible, yes. I'd like to file at least _some_ bugs first, though. | |
| [12:52] <RAOF> Such as "has no concept of multi-head" | |
| [13:00] <persia> Could anyone explain why pycentral might report "pycentral: pycentral pkginstall: not overwriting local files", as in http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14327059/DpkgTerminalLog.txt? Is this likely due to user customisation, or is it a packaging issue? | |
| [13:05] <geser> persia: looking into /usr/bin/pycentral this seems to be set from the option "overwrite-local" in /etc/python/debian_config | |
| [13:06] <geser> I don't have it set in my /etc/python/debian_config | |
| [13:06] <wgrant> persia: I've seen the problem with a Dapper upgrade. | |
| [13:07] <geser> man pycentral mentions this option in the FILES section | |
| [13:07] <wgrant> But it doesn't look like it could be the problem here. | |
| [13:07] <persia> So, do I need to do anything to the package to fix it, or just leave it alone? (I'm processing NBS, so like to minimize actual changes) | |
| [13:07] <wgrant> In my case, python-opengl didn't conflict with python2.4-opengl, so pycentral refused to overwrite the python2.4 opengl bits. | |
| [13:08] <wgrant> Adding a conflicts against it was the solution there, but it could be a local installation in this case. | |
| [13:09] <persia> Should python-csound conflict with python2.5-csound, just to be sure? | |
| [13:10] <persia> It currently Provides: it, which makes me think that such a package used to exist (or maybe python2.4-csound) | |
| [13:12] <geser> the provides are generated: Provides: ${python:Provides} | |
| [13:13] <emgent> morning | |
| [13:15] <persia> geser: Right. I'm just wondering if it needs a conflicts, or if bug #227651 is not really valid. | |
| [13:15] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 227651 in csound "package python-csound 1:5.08.0.dfsg2-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/227651 | |
| [13:21] <persia> Grumble. Publisher appears out of date for glib2.0-dev on archive.ubuntu.com :( | |
| [13:25] <wgrant> persia: Hm? | |
| [13:26] <wgrant> There is no glib2.0-dev, is there? | |
| [13:27] <wgrant> And all right libglib2.0-devs are there.. | |
| [13:27] <persia> Err. Right. libglib2.0-dev. 1ubuntu2 is in packages for amd64, and 1ubuntu3 is in the pool (1ubuntu2 is gone). I presume it will catch up soon. | |
| [13:27] <wgrant> Oops. | |
| [13:27] <wgrant> That is a bug. | |
| [13:28] <wgrant> Though it may be a sysadmin bug. | |
| [13:28] <persia> Yep. The first package I ran worked, but the ~12:00 UTC run seems to have befuddled it. | |
| [13:28] <persia> Is the bug likely to be a Packages.gz construction issue, or just a timing issue? | |
| [13:29] <wgrant> Um, glib2.0 has been a sync for three weeks now. | |
| [13:29] <wgrant> No ubuntuX. | |
| [13:31] <geser> persia: hardy or intrepid? | |
| [13:31] <wgrant> Oh, right, Hardy makes more sense. | |
| [13:31] <wgrant> I forget that it still exists. | |
| [13:32] <persia> geser: intrepid. I'm tesing bare package install now, rather than looking at a build failure, just in case I did something wrong. | |
| [13:32] <wgrant> What's the full version you want? | |
| [13:33] <wgrant> 'Version: 2.17.2-1' | |
| [13:33] <wgrant> That's in amd64 Packages.gz on a.u.c. | |
| [13:34] <persia> Right. I'm not sure where I got the error. I may have inadvertantly spelled intrepid h-a-r-d-y. | |
| [13:34] <wgrant> Heh | |
| [13:37] <krzysz01> A have a project readfile. i have made .debs for it and they are in my ppa (krzysdrewniak on launchpad) check it out. | |
| [13:37] <krzysz01> what should i do now? | |
| [13:37] <krzysz01> i made a .deb of wine 1.0 | |
| [13:37] <persia> krzysz01: What is your goal? | |
| [13:38] <krzysz01> i'm trying readfile into the repos, but it needs some polishing still | |
| [13:39] <persia> krzysz01: Are you up for polishing it, or do you need review? | |
| [13:40] <krzysz01> i am adding some new features before i submit it for review | |
| [13:40] <krzysz01> i'm still working on it | |
| [13:41] <persia> krzysz01: Then the answer to the question "what should i do now?" is "add some new features before submitting it for review". | |
| [13:41] <krzysz01> stay tuned it will probably be good when i get to 1.0 | |
| [13:41] <krzysz01> see ya | |
| [13:42] <DktrKranz> bah... packages.{ubuntu.com,debian.org} are not responding | |
| [13:44] <persia> DktrKranz: packages.qa.debian.org, launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/$(pkgname) | |
| [13:45] <DktrKranz> unluckily, I needed them for some tests, so I guess I have to wait | |
| [13:45] <devfil> persia: can you please take a look at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crystalspace/+bug/242961 ? I need 2 sponsors for it | |
| [13:45] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 242961 in crystalspace "Please update crystalspace to 1.2.1" [Undecided,Confirmed] | |
| [13:46] <persia> devfil: I really know nothing about crystalspace, except that it's a mess. Anyway, why do you need two sponsors? | |
| [13:46] <devfil> persia: it is a new package | |
| [13:47] <DktrKranz> NEW? mmh | |
| [13:47] <devfil> persia: a new huge work as wxwidgets2.8 | |
| [13:47] <devfil> not new package, new version, sorry | |
| [13:47] <DktrKranz> probably it deserves four eyes to look at it, but it's not NEW :) | |
| [13:49] <rzr> there are a few RC in crystal space affecting debian's release | |
| [13:50] <devfil> rzr: this is why I upgraded it to the latest stable version | |
| [13:50] <rzr> good job | |
| [13:53] <devfil> rzr: I also asked Debian maintainer to let me work at it (NMU), but I didn't receive any reply for now | |
| [13:53] <rzr> i know him personnaly | |
| [13:53] <rzr> he's offline now | |
| [13:53] <rzr> can you NMU it ? | |
| [13:54] <devfil> rzr: yes | |
| [13:54] <bliZZardz> what is NMU? | |
| [13:55] <devfil> bliZZardz: Non Maintainer Upload in Debian | |
| [13:55] <geser> Non-Maintainer Upload (Debian) | |
| [13:55] <rzr> only DD can NMU packages right? | |
| [13:55] <bliZZardz> and does that mean that people who do not maintain it, contribute a patch/feature? | |
| [13:56] <devfil> rzr: I don't know, if I do it, probably, Debian maintainer should sponsor it | |
| [13:57] <DktrKranz> rzr, DD can upload packages, but everyone can propose a NMU if there's RC or release-goal bugs | |
| [13:57] <rzr> devfil: well I would attach a debdiff to the bug first | |
| [13:57] <bliZZardz> i was exploring Dbus yday, i need some mentor to help me out understand it better. Would this be the right forum? | |
| [13:58] <persia> rzr: A debdiff of a new upstream? Isn't that hard to read (and might it be impossible to generate given binary changes in the upstream tarball)? | |
| [13:58] <persia> bliZZardz: For some very limited types of questions, yes. For deeper questions, probably not. | |
| [13:59] <bliZZardz> persia : and that would be? | |
| [13:59] <bliZZardz> persia: you :) ? | |
| [13:59] <persia> Not I, no :) | |
| [14:05] <devfil> rzr: why Debian maintainer of crystalspace is offline? | |
| [14:05] <rzr> he probally has a life :) | |
| [14:06] <DktrKranz> not so bad, after all | |
| [14:06] <sistpoty> bah, rl is overrated *g+ | |
| === bliZZardz is now known as bliZZardz_ | |
| [14:07] <DktrKranz> bliZZardz_, I guess the most qualified person is pitti, but he's on holidays at the moment and he's a very busy developer | |
| [14:08] <bliZZardz_> DktrKranz : presently i am doing some triaging, but i would like to get into Dev - hence am looking out for some mentors. I am comfy with Python. | |
| [14:09] <DktrKranz> whoa! I've just become a DM! \o/ | |
| [14:09] <persia> DktrKranz: Congratulations! | |
| === bliZZardz_ is now known as bliZZardz | |
| [14:09] <DktrKranz> persia, thanks | |
| [14:10] <bliZZardz> DM? (deb mentor?) | |
| [14:10] <DktrKranz> bliZZardz, well... if you're comfortable with dbus (or utopia-related stuff), pitti has some mentoring slots available | |
| [14:11] <bliZZardz> DktrKranz: just started with DBus..need some initial pointers | |
| [14:12] <DktrKranz> so I guess triaging bugs should be good at the moment | |
| [14:12] <DktrKranz> personally, I haven't any documentation available | |
| [14:13] <bliZZardz> DktrKranz: what abt projects(in python) that have mentoring slots available? | |
| [14:14] <DktrKranz> bliZZardz, for python related bugs, you may want to look at pythonistas bugs | |
| [14:15] <bliZZardz> DktrKranz : yes - am there. | |
| [14:15] <DktrKranz> cool :) | |
| [14:16] <bliZZardz> just getting a feel of the bugs ; looks like most of them need complete module knowledge | |
| [14:16] <DktrKranz> I'm sure there are some entry-level bugs | |
| [14:17] <DktrKranz> eventually, you can look at bugs marked as bitesize | |
| [14:31] <\sh> we made it ! http://leonov.tv/content/leonov-launchpad-desktop-client-first-coming | |
| [14:32] <persia> \sh: Congratulations. Nice job. | |
| [14:32] <\sh> persia: thx :) | |
| [14:32] * \sh is sweating like hell | |
| [14:33] <devfil> \sh: great job! | |
| [14:33] <persia> \sh: The bugs will come. Have no fear :) | |
| [14:33] <bliZZardz> persia : LOL ") | |
| [14:33] <\sh> persia: seele was reviewing our work already...so I have a lot of them already :) and no, I don't fear any bugs :) | |
| [14:34] <sistpoty> \sh: apt-cache showsrc leonov doesn't yield a result... please fix :P | |
| [14:35] <persia> sistpoty: Please file a needs-packaging bug to request new software :p | |
| [14:35] <DktrKranz> ACK from me, please upload to NEW queue :D | |
| [14:36] <\sh> sistpoty: lol | |
| [14:42] * sistpoty is now off again, enjoying the weekend... cya | |
| [14:43] <tacone> \sh: congratulations :) when will we be able to download bug informations for offline usage? (ok ok.. jocking) | |
| [14:43] <\sh> tacone: please file a wishlist report (seriously) :) | |
| [14:44] <\sh> tacone: I thought about that already, tbh | |
| [14:44] <tacone> \sh: I feared you would have asked that. | |
| [14:44] <tacone> ehehe | |
| [14:47] <tacone> \sh: seems I can't mark it as wishlist myself https://bugs.launchpad.net/leonov/+bug/243960 | |
| [14:47] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 243960 in leonov "Please store bug information for offline usage" [Undecided,New] | |
| [14:48] <\sh> tacone: done :) | |
| [14:48] <tacone> \sh: nice | |
| [14:48] <\sh> ah da nixternal | |
| [14:52] <\sh> phew... | |
| [14:52] <nixternal> yay power | |
| [14:53] <persia> nixternal: You're one of those kubuntu folk right? Are you guys chasing NBS yet? There seems to be a few packages listed... | |
| [14:54] <\sh> nixternal: dude, you are also mentioned in our announcement :) | |
| [14:55] <nixternal> what announcement? | |
| [14:55] <\sh> nixternal: check p.u.c | |
| [14:55] <nixternal> persia: dunno, ask Riddell...I have been working to much lately, so unfortunately I haven't been that close to what is going on | |
| [14:58] <nixternal> hehe, \sh...that has come along quick man...I liked reading the posts seeing how much it changed almost daily | |
| [14:58] <nixternal> good job! | |
| [14:59] <geser> \sh: p.u.c is ambiguous: people.u.c, packages.u.c, planet.u.c :) | |
| [14:59] <\sh> nixternal: that's only the beginning of something really bug^Wbig | |
| [14:59] <wgrant> popcon as well! | |
| [14:59] <wgrant> I wonder if any other letter is as ambiguous. | |
| [14:59] <nixternal> geser: ya, I did packages.ubuntu.com at first :P | |
| [14:59] <\sh> damn...b.u.c is missing...beer.ubuntu.com ;) | |
| [14:59] <nixternal> then I went, OH! Planet! | |
| [15:00] <\sh> packages is pkg.u.c. ;) | |
| [15:29] <Riddell> persia: NBS? | |
| [15:38] <geser> siretart: Hi, as you seem to care about ffmpeg-free: should "ffmpeg-config --libs avformat" result in the same output as "pkg-config --libs libavformat"? | |
| [15:38] <geser> I ask because I stumbled about a package which FTBFS (moc) because ffmpeg-config still lists "-la52" | |
| [15:42] <persia> Riddell: http://people.ubuntu.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ | |
| [15:42] <persia> Looks like either there's a lot of changes expected, or lots of rebuilds to process. | |
| [15:45] <Riddell> changes are expected, since we moved to KDE 4 | |
| [15:47] <persia> Riddell: OK. I won't poke them then. Thanks. | |
| [15:50] <siretart> geser: ffmpeg-config will go away in the next upload. please make the package use pkg-config instead | |
| [15:55] <geser> siretart: I've done that. I just wondered if the output of ffmpeg-config should match the output of pkg-config as long as ffmpeg-config still exists. | |
| [16:04] <siretart> geser: it probably should. that's one of the reasons why we want to get rid of ffmpeg-config | |
| [16:20] <persia> Does anyone have a good ddeb recovery hook for sbuild? I'm generating ddebs, but throwing them away, which doesn't seem ideal. | |
| === wolfger__ is now known as wolfger | |
| [16:26] <devfil_> persia: wow, a lot of upload today | |
| [16:27] <persia> devfil_: Trying to clean up some of the outstanding transitions for universe. | |
| [16:27] <devfil_> persia: good job | |
| [16:27] <AnAnt> Hello | |
| [16:27] <devfil_> hi AnAnt | |
| [16:28] <persia> Bah. Uploaded things out of order again :( At least the retry button works. | |
| [16:29] <AnAnt> persia: that brainstorm discussion is dead ? | |
| [16:29] <devfil_> persia: nobody is perfect | |
| [16:29] <persia> AnAnt: I think so. | |
| [16:40] <AnAnt> persia: ok, I know I'm asking for a big thing, I mean about glibc | |
| [16:41] <persia> -ECONTEXT | |
| [16:41] <AnAnt> huh ? | |
| [16:41] <AnAnt> what's that ? | |
| [16:41] <persia> Context error, meaning I have no idea about what you are writing | |
| [16:42] <AnAnt> persia: the suggestion I mentioned on brainstorm post | |
| [16:42] <laga> persia: i prefer this: http://heresabunnywithapancakeonitshead.com/ | |
| [16:42] <AnAnt> is packages.ubuntu.com working ? | |
| [16:48] <persia> AnAnt: Oh, right. Alternate calendars. I have no idea how that might work, but think it deserves it's own idea on brainstorm, rather than getting mixed in with that one. | |
| [16:49] <AnAnt> is there a problem with packages.ubuntu.com ? | |
| [16:52] <i4x> hi everyone! | |
| [16:55] <i4x> I want to use a .deb package to install some files, but I'm not sure where to put them. I'm using the openweakhardy/PackagingA tutorial and the only problem I have is to install that files! | |
| [16:56] <i4x> where do I put them? in ed-0.9/debian/ folder?? | |
| [16:58] <i4x> I created 'ed-0.9/debian/tmp/mp/' and 'ed-0.9/debian/tmp/database/' folders. made the 'debuild -us -uc' and it returned no errors! | |
| [16:59] <persia> i4x: What kind of files? | |
| [16:59] <i4x> but when installing, the postinst can't find the folders and .... | |
| [17:00] <i4x> persia: I need to install: /tmp/database/mp.sql and /tmp/mp/runner (script) | |
| [17:01] <bobbo> AnAnt: yeah package.ubuntu.com is down for me too | |
| [17:02] <bobbo> s/package/packages | |
| [17:02] <nhandler> I have a quick question. The package I am working on comes with .desktop files (not the debian directory). The package does not have a patch system in place. Should I add a patch system to the package in order to modify the .desktop files? If so, which type of patch system should I use? Or should I just modify the .desktop files in the debdiff? | |
| [17:02] <persia> i4x: You really don't want to install anything to /tmp. Why not install the sql into /usr/share/$(package)/$(package).sql, and embed the script in the postinst? | |
| [17:03] <geser> nhandler: I'd only add a patch system for big changes | |
| [17:03] <nhandler> geser, So for this instance, it would be better to modify something outside of the /debian directory in the debdiff than to add a patch system? | |
| [17:03] <persia> nhandler: I'd recommend checking other packages by the same maintainer, and possibly introducing a patch system that matches their style. | |
| [17:04] <geser> nhandler: especially if the package has already some changes (from Debian) adding a patch system isn't wise (for small changes) as you end with some changes as patches (Ubuntu) and some changes applied directly (Debian) | |
| [17:04] * persia very strongly agrees with geser about packages with changes in diff.gz | |
| [17:05] <i4x> persia: the script will be installed to init.d to run at startup, and the database will only be used once by postinst that installs the database and then removes it. | |
| [17:05] <geser> nhandler: depending how much you want to change, I wouldn't add a patch system just to change a few lines in a .desktop file | |
| [17:06] <persia> i4x: For the init script, investigate dh_installinit. For the sql, I still think it belongs in /usr/share/$(package)/$(package).sql for later reference by the user. | |
| [17:06] <nhandler> geser, It looks like I'll just be adding Icon lines to a few .desktop files that are in the package. I might also be making a few minor changes to the .desktop files to make them validate. | |
| [17:06] <persia> geser: I've had more success getting patches into Debian when I follow the maintainer's style, which is why I recommend that research. | |
| [17:08] <i4x> persia: I know there are some .ex files as init.d.ex .. but I don't understand so much to use them. and, are you saying to install the sql to /usr/share/$(package)/$(package).sql ? if so, how? | |
| [17:09] <persia> i4x: Put it in debian/ then add it to your $(package).install file. | |
| [17:10] <i4x> persia: hm, ok.. I'll search for the *.install file.. | |
| [17:10] <persia> i4x: read the manual pages for dh_install and dh_installinit | |
| [17:10] <nhandler> persia and geser: It looks like the Debian maintainer only has 7 packages. I'll look at them and see if I can find a preferred patch system. If I can't, I think I'll just include the changes in the debdiff | |
| [17:11] <i4x> persia: thx, I'll do that! (y) | |
| [17:18] <nhandler> persia, I just checked all 7 of the Maintainer's packages. None of them use a patch system. In this case, do you agree that I should just include the changes to the files that are outside of the debian directory in the debdiff? | |
| [17:18] <persia> nhandler: Very much so. | |
| [17:18] <nhandler> geser and persia: Thank you for your help. I'll go and make the changes now. | |
| [17:32] <porthose> warp10: ping | |
| [17:38] <alex-weej> i'm looking to build the debian package for nautilus-open-terminal on Hardy | |
| [17:38] <alex-weej> the version for Debian Experimental requires a newer version of libpango (i guess because it was just built against it) | |
| [17:38] <alex-weej> how do i get the source from DebExp? | |
| [17:39] <ScottK-laptop> If it's in experimental, it's probably there for a good reason. | |
| [17:39] <alex-weej> there's nothing much experimental about nautilus-open-terminal | |
| [17:39] <alex-weej> it gets about 3 commits a year | |
| [17:39] <ScottK-laptop> One was is to go to packages.qa.debian.org, find the package package page, and then dget -x the .dsc. | |
| [17:40] <alex-weej> thanks, i see the DSCs | |
| [17:40] <ScottK-laptop> It might be building against the new libpango is the only reason it's there. | |
| [17:41] <alex-weej> ScottK-laptop: that got me a .orig.tar.gz and a .diff.gz | |
| [17:41] <ScottK-laptop> Did you use -x? | |
| [17:41] <alex-weej> (sorry, i'm used to apt-get source wiping my bottom for me) | |
| [17:42] <alex-weej> yes | |
| [17:42] <ScottK-laptop> It should have unpacked the source too then. | |
| [17:42] <ScottK-laptop> If it didn't, you can dpkg-source -x filename.dsc to unpack it. | |
| [17:42] <alex-weej> it bombed here" dscverify: can't find any Debian keyrings | |
| [17:43] <ScottK-laptop> So it couldn't verify the signature. | |
| [17:43] <ScottK-laptop> IIRC, the package with the Debian Keyring in it is deceptively called debian-keyring. | |
| [17:44] <ScottK-laptop> I've got a little X windows problem here, so I'll be back (hopefully) in a little bit. | |
| [17:48] <ScottK-laptop> Hopefully that will be better. | |
| [17:48] <alex-weej> OK, nautilus-open-terminal package in Debian Experimental builds fine on Hardy | |
| [17:48] <alex-weej> and works as expected | |
| [17:48] <alex-weej> what do i need to do to get it pushed into Hardy Universe? | |
| [17:48] <ScottK-laptop> It needs to get into Intrepid. | |
| [17:49] <alex-weej> can it then go via hardy-backports->hardy-updates? | |
| [17:49] <ScottK-laptop> Not usally. | |
| [17:49] <ScottK-laptop> What bug are you fixing to get it updated? | |
| [17:49] <alex-weej> the on-desktop behaviour drops you in $HOME previously | |
| [17:49] <ScottK-laptop> Is there a bug? | |
| [17:49] <alex-weej> it was fixed, with the old behaviour being in a gconf option | |
| [17:49] <alex-weej> a long time ago | |
| [17:50] <alex-weej> and 0.9 was released on 28 February 2008, so the debian packages have just been lagging | |
| [17:50] <ScottK-laptop> Intrepid already has 0.9 | |
| [17:51] <alex-weej> oh... hmm... i probably should have just used that | |
| [17:51] <alex-weej> haha, oh well | |
| [17:52] <alex-weej> yay, now to just drop the habit of typing cd ~/Desktop every time i open a terminal | |
| [17:53] <ScottK-laptop> alex-weej: I don't think this qualifies for -updates. It's not a regression, data loss, or crash issue. | |
| [17:53] <ScottK-laptop> You could get the new version in -backports. | |
| [17:54] <alex-weej> ok, is it a lot of effort? | |
| [17:54] <ScottK-laptop> No. | |
| [17:55] <alex-weej> what do i do? | |
| [17:55] <ScottK-laptop> You've already done virtually all the work (testing). | |
| [17:55] <ScottK-laptop> !backports | alex-weej | |
| [17:55] <ubottu> alex-weej: If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging | |
| [17:55] <ScottK-laptop> You file a bug against the hardy-backports project as described above. | |
| [17:55] <alex-weej> got it, thanks | |
| [17:56] <ScottK-laptop> alex-weej: Ping me when it's done and I'll approve it. | |
| [17:56] <alex-weej> well... i haven't really tested it properly... :S | |
| [17:56] <alex-weej> i mean, it works | |
| [17:56] <alex-weej> maybe i should use it for a bit first | |
| [17:57] <ScottK-laptop> For backports, the standard is "Builds, installs, runs" - You pass that. | |
| [17:57] <ScottK-laptop> More testing is welcome, but you've done the minimum. | |
| [17:57] <ScottK-laptop> Note that backports is not enabled by default for what are generally considered good reasons ... | |
| [17:57] <ScottK-laptop> Actually we have very few problems. | |
| [17:57] <alex-weej> yeah of course | |
| [17:58] <alex-weej> ok just a mo | |
| [18:03] <alex-weej> ScottK: you beat me to the original bug :P | |
| [18:03] <ScottK-laptop> ;-) | |
| [18:03] <alex-weej> i will link it in the backport request | |
| === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde | |
| [18:06] <alex-weej> ScottK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/244017 | |
| [18:06] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 244017 in hardy-backports "Backport nautilus-open-terminal 0.9 from Intrepid to Hardy" [Undecided,New] | |
| [18:07] <ScottK-laptop> alex-weej: Mark it confirmed to show you've tested it. | |
| [18:08] <alex-weej> done | |
| [18:10] <ScottK-laptop> alex-weej: Approved and passed to the archive-admins. It should get backported the next time the process backports. | |
| [18:10] <alex-weej> cheers | |
| [18:13] <i4x> ppl, I'm trying to understand how to use 'dh_install', but I'm confused.. anyone knows how to use it and gives me an example? I just need to understand how the package recognizes the folders/files to install and moves them! | |
| [18:14] <ScottK-laptop> i4x: Did you read man dh_intall? | |
| [18:16] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: yes, I did! | |
| [18:17] <ScottK-laptop> i4x: Did you see the bit about "debian/package.install"? | |
| [18:19] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: I've no '($package).install' file.. | |
| [18:19] <ScottK-laptop> Make one that lists the files you want installed. | |
| [18:20] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: do I have to modify anything in rules? | |
| [18:20] <i4x> ok, but where do I create it? debian/ ? | |
| [18:21] <ScottK-laptop> Yes. | |
| [18:21] <i4x> and what should I put there? | |
| [18:21] <ScottK-laptop> A list of the files to install. | |
| [18:22] <i4x> '/folder/to/create/file' ?? only? | |
| [18:25] <i4x> and will the 'package.install' be recognized automatic while debuilding? or should I run 'dh_install' something? | |
| [18:25] <ScottK-laptop> Is your debian/rules cdbs or debhelper? | |
| [18:26] <ScottK-laptop> If it's CDBS, it's automatic magic. If it's debhelper, dh_install needs to be called, but it's in the standard template. | |
| [18:31] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: "# Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper." | |
| [18:31] <i4x> 'standard template'? | |
| [18:32] <ScottK-laptop> Yes. | |
| [18:33] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: what do you mean with 'standard template'? | |
| [18:34] <ScottK-laptop> When you run dh_make to start making a debhelper based package, it makes a standard rules file. That's what I mean. | |
| [18:37] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: "dh_install needs to be called, but it's in the standard template." it means that the rules (standard template) calls 'dh_install' ? | |
| [18:37] <i4x> if so, my problem is resolved. if not, how when and how do I call dh_install? | |
| [18:38] <ScottK-laptop> i4x: Please pastebin your debian/rules. | |
| [18:41] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: http://pastebin.com/d400d5b5d | |
| [18:42] <ScottK-laptop> Looking | |
| [18:43] <ScottK-laptop> i4x: Look at line 74. It's commeted out. Remove the "#" and you should be good. | |
| [18:50] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: ok, I'll do that! another 2 questions: since the package has the name 'ed-0.9', should I create 'debian/ed-0.9.install' ? and to use 'dh_installinit' is the same thing as 'dh_install', isn't it? | |
| [18:51] <ScottK-laptop> No and No. | |
| [18:53] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: so, what name I call the 'package.install' file? | |
| [18:54] <ScottK-laptop> ed.install | |
| [18:54] <ScottK-laptop> -0.9 is the version. | |
| [19:09] <ScottK-laptop> jdong: Just because it's summer vacation for you doesn't mean you're off duty on backports. | |
| [19:09] * ScottK-laptop just ack'ed ~20 for Hardy. | |
| [19:16] <nxvl> siretart: around? | |
| [19:23] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: I'm having this problem: "cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//tmp/mp/runner': No such file or directory" after 'dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp' | |
| [19:24] <ScottK-laptop> i4x: Try it without the /tmp | |
| [19:25] <i4x> * "cp: cannot stat `debian//tmp/mp/runner': No such file or directory" | |
| [19:25] <ScottK-laptop> I suspect you also need $(curdir)/debian (that's from memory so the syntax may not be perfect. | |
| [19:31] <i4x> the problem is in the both '/' in the middle! | |
| [19:31] <i4x> 'rules' has 'dh_install --sourcedir=debian' | |
| [19:31] <i4x> and the 'ed.install' has 'tmp/mp/runner' . | |
| [19:31] <i4x> but it puts 2 '/' in the middle! | |
| [19:36] <i4x> but ScottK-laptop, do you know why it puts the // between 'debian' and 'tmp/mp/runner' ? | |
| [19:38] <nxvl> ScottK-laptop: is there any doc somewhere on how to test you .debs? | |
| [19:39] <ScottK-laptop> i4x: No, but I don't think it matters. | |
| [19:39] <ScottK-laptop> nxvl: Context please? | |
| [19:40] <nxvl> ScottK-laptop: i still have an rpath issue with augeas, but i don't know how to test the .debs to see if they still have it | |
| [19:40] <ScottK-laptop> How do you know you still have it? | |
| [19:41] <nxvl> ScottK-laptop: because siretart say i still have it (after reviewing it) | |
| [19:41] <ScottK-laptop> Ah. | |
| [19:41] <ScottK-laptop> Does lintian run against the .deb complain about it? | |
| [19:41] <nxvl> and i don'y want to try to fix the problem, upload it, and wait for someone to tell me it's already fixed or not | |
| [19:41] <nxvl> i have run it | |
| [19:41] <nxvl> but nothing shows up | |
| [19:44] <ScottK-laptop> nxvl: Have you seen http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue | |
| [19:45] <nxvl> ScottK-laptop: yep | |
| [19:47] <ScottK-laptop> nxvl: What happens when you grep aclocal.m4, configure.in or configure.ac for hardcode_into_libs | |
| [19:47] <i4x> ScottK-laptop: it makes the 'cp' return: "cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//tmp/mp/runner': No such file or directory". So I think that the problem is there! | |
| [19:47] <i4x> * "cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//mp/runner': No such file or directory" | |
| [19:48] <ScottK-laptop> i4x: At this point I usually login to my pbuilder chroot, use debuild to build the package and then see what dirs/files are present when it dies. | |
| [19:49] <nxvl> ScottK-laptop: a lot of "yes" show up | |
| [19:50] <ScottK-laptop> nxvl: Then based on that wiki page, I'd say that's how you know. | |
| [19:51] <nxvl> ScottK-laptop: yes, but the problem is: should i use a patch system? or should i run sed on the debian/rules (this hasn't worked early) | |
| [19:52] <ScottK-laptop> nxvl: I'm not sure. I'd tend to go with patch system. | |
| [19:53] <nxvl> ScottK-laptop: but patch is before configure | |
| [19:58] <warp10> porthose: pong | |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | |
| [20:03] <porthose> warp10: can I send you a pm :) | |
| [20:03] <warp10> porthose: for sure! BTW, I'm just reading your mail :) | |
| [20:04] <porthose> cool that's what it's about | |
| [20:07] <porthose> warp10: email me with what you decide please, have to get ready for work (sigh) | |
| [20:08] <warp10> porthose: no problem at all about a new mentee for me. BTW, once big Cesare expressed some concerns about people mentoring people speaking the same mother-tongue | |
| [20:09] <norsetto> warp10: I'm not big, I'm just weight-challenged | |
| [20:09] <warp10> norsetto: heh... speaking about the devil... | |
| [20:11] <norsetto> warp10: yes, its part of the guidelines we discussed, try to avoid mentor-mentee of the same mother-tongue | |
| [20:13] <porthose> norsetto: np have another I can send warp10 after I do the work thing | |
| [20:13] <porthose> warp10: would that be Ok | |
| [20:13] <warp10> norsetto: I definitely agree. BTW, no problem for me on taking a new mentee (also because David is a little busy at now) | |
| [20:14] <warp10> porthose: sounds good! | |
| [20:14] <norsetto> porthose: sure, how are things going? having fun :-) ? | |
| [20:15] <porthose> norsetto: getting organized and trying to make my first match | |
| [20:17] <porthose> norsetto: but alas duty (work) calls, bye | |
| [20:17] <norsetto> porthose: bye | |
| [20:18] <warp10> bye porthose | |
| [20:19] <norsetto> warp10: say the truth, you are also looking forward to working on Sunday, or Christmas Eve | |
| [20:19] <warp10> norsetto: I like to work on Sunday, but not on Christmas Eve, indeed! | |
| [20:21] <bobbo> warp10: hey Andrea! | |
| [20:21] <warp10> Ciao bobbo! How do you do? | |
| [20:22] <bobbo> warp10: un-banned from the computer :D | |
| [20:22] <bobbo> unfortunately im on holiday for a week tomorrow, then have a job all summer, but at least i can check my emails | |
| [20:23] <warp10> bobbo: unbanned? great! Intrepid really needs your help to be a rocking distro! | |
| [20:24] <bobbo> warp10: hehe, 30 uploads so far in Intrepid, itll be rocking already :P | |
| [20:25] * norsetto didn't even know there was a way to see how many uploads one did | |
| [20:26] <warp10> bobbo: 30, really? sounds great! | |
| [20:26] <bobbo> norsetto: i wrote my own PHP+MySQL app to log my uploads, i add the details into the db then it shows a load of statistics etc about it | |
| [20:27] <bobbo> warp10: hehe, i think its around 28 at the moment, but i have some to add in when my server gets back up | |
| [20:27] <warp10> norsetto: Dktrkranz wrote a small python script to get the ranking | |
| [20:28] * warp10 runs the script | |
| [20:28] <norsetto> bobbo, warp10: interesting, how do these scripts work? bobbo one I guess is local, but the dktrkranz one I guess is operating on the LP db? | |
| [20:29] <bobbo> norsetto: yeah mine is local, Dktrkranzes sounds interesting | |
| [20:30] <warp10> norsetto: nope, it gets data from <distro>changes@ mailing list | |
| [20:30] <norsetto> warp10: ah, I didn't know the uploader was in those emails | |
| [20:30] <bobbo> warp10: have you got a link to that script? | |
| [20:31] <warp10> norsetto, bobbo: http://paste.beeseek.org/36 | |
| [20:31] <bobbo> warp10: thanks :D | |
| [20:32] <warp10> bobbo: ;) | |
| [20:32] <norsetto> warp10: ah, ok, thats not the uploader then | |
| [20:33] <warp10> norsetto: nope, it's just the "changed by" field. | |
| [20:33] <warp10> bobbo: you are 23rd in the list, with 26 packages | |
| [20:33] <bobbo> 26 packages, almost 30 (ish) :P | |
| [20:33] <norsetto> warp10: I guess one could also see the uploader by checking the gpg key though | |
| [20:34] <bobbo> 1 Jonathan Riddell (266 packages) o.0 | |
| [20:34] <warp10> norsetto: well, I would like to modify that script using gpg keys to make a sponsors ranking, indeed | |
| [20:35] <warp10> norsetto: it shouldn't be that difficult | |
| [20:35] <norsetto> warp10: the difficult bit would be to collect all the gpg keys | |
| [20:36] <warp10> norsetto: indeed. That would probably require some work with Launchpad | |
| [20:38] * norsetto wonders who root was | |
| [20:39] <warp10> norsetto: the real mysterious one is 141 ??????? (1 packages) | |
| [20:40] <norsetto> warp10: also, i was surprised to see that siretart had only 1 upload, until I saw that he is uploading with his real name too :-) | |
| [20:40] <warp10> :D | |
| === bmk789__ is now known as bmk789 | |
| [21:37] <i4x> norsetto: are you there? | |
| [21:38] <norsetto> i4x: yes sir | |
| === pgquiles_ is now known as pgquiles | |
| [22:23] <i4x> norsetto: already there? I'm having problems building a package.. because it puts 2 '/' between 'debian' and 'tmp/mp/database.sql', returning error. | |
| [22:24] <i4x> *still there? | |
| [22:25] <norsetto> i4x: that shouldn't be a problem; anyhow, check dir names in debian/rules (and perhaps also debian/*.install) | |
| [22:27] <i4x> I checked! | |
| [22:29] <i4x> norsetto: debian/rules has ' dh_install --sourcedir=$(CURDIR)/debian' and debian/ed.install has 'tmp/mp/database.sql' | |
| [22:30] <i4x> I can't understand why appears '//' between 'debian' and 'tmp/...' | |
| [22:33] <i4x> norsetto: | |
| [22:33] <i4x> dh_install --sourcedir=/home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian | |
| [22:33] <i4x> cp: cannot stat `/home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian//tmp/mp/temporario': No such file or directory | |
| [22:34] <i4x> any idea? | |
| [22:36] <norsetto> i4x: the path seem wrong, you should use relative paths only unless you want things to fails in chroot, pbuilder, etc. | |
| [22:37] <warp10> Any REVU admin around? | |
| [22:43] <jpds> warp10: key sync? | |
| [22:44] <geser> i4x: and that path is really there? | |
| [22:44] <warp10> jpds: no, REVU still sees me as a contributor, I would like to fix that | |
| [22:45] <jpds> warp10: One moment please. | |
| [22:46] <i4x> norsetto and geser: this is the path: '/home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian/tmp/mp/' | |
| [22:47] <i4x> but I just need one '/', not 2. | |
| [22:48] <jpds> warp10: "Altering warp10@ubuntu.com to level reviewer"- | |
| [22:50] <geser> i4x: what gives "ls -l /home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian//tmp/mp" ? | |
| [22:51] <warp10> jpds: mmm... my login is warp10@libero.it, but if you can change it to warp10@ubuntu.com I would prefer it. If I try to login with @ubuntu.com, it says "There is no REVU account for warp10@ubuntu.com, yet." | |
| [22:51] <i4x> geser: that returns: ls: cannot access /home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian//tmp/mp: No such file or directory | |
| [22:51] <jpds> warp10: You'll have to upload a package with that email. | |
| [22:51] <jpds> warp10: Unless you'd prefer to use the old login. | |
| [22:52] <warp10> jpds: I am seen as a contributor with the old login. BTW, I should upload a package within days, that should fix everything | |
| [22:53] <jpds> warp10: OK, ping me when you've uploaded with the new email and I'll bump the level. | |
| [22:54] * jpds goes to bed. Night all. | |
| [22:54] <nxvl> why do we install recommends by default | |
| [22:54] <nxvl> is a mess | |
| [22:54] <nxvl> :S | |
| [22:54] <geser> i4x: the extra / should hurt, does "ls -l /home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ed-0.9/debian//tmp" work? | |
| [22:54] <warp10> jpds: great. Thank you so much! | |
| [22:54] <norsetto> i4x: the problem is surely not the doubl / | |
| [22:54] <geser> nxvl: :) just file bugs about wrong recommends | |
| [22:55] <i4x> norsetto and geser: it seems that 'debuild' removes the folder debian/tmp !! | |
| [22:56] <i4x> and then, when needed, it can't find it! | |
| [22:56] <geser> yes, the clean target gets called before build | |
| [22:57] <i4x> geser: what should I do? | |
| [22:57] <i4x> :S | |
| [22:57] <nxvl> geser: all? | |
| [22:57] <nxvl> :D | |
| [22:57] <geser> nxvl: if all are wrong then yes | |
| [22:57] <nxvl> yes | |
| [22:57] <nxvl> they ALL are wrong | |
| [22:57] <nxvl> :P | |
| [22:58] <geser> i4x: can you pastebin your debian/rules? | |
| [22:58] <geser> nxvl: now you have a good reason to fix it now :) | |
| [22:58] <i4x> sure! | |
| [22:58] <i4x> geser: ..a moment, please! | |
| [23:00] <i4x> geser: http://pastebin.com/d312c383d | |
| [23:01] <nxvl> geser: i mean, the recommends are not strictly necesary and they affect the choose option | |
| [23:01] <nxvl> it's just wrong | |
| [23:01] <i4x> geser: should I move 'dh_install --sourcedir=$(CURDIR)/debian' before 'dh_clean' ? | |
| [23:04] <geser> no, your rules file looks ok | |
| [23:05] <i4x> geser: do you have any idea? | |
| [23:08] <geser> not yet | |
| [23:08] <albert23> i4x: do you have a file debian/compat? If so, which value is in it? | |
| [23:08] <i4x> albert23: 5 | |
| [23:09] <geser> i4x: can you make the whole source package available? so I can look at it | |
| [23:10] <i4x> iupiiiiiii!! | |
| [23:10] <i4x> it seems it worked!! | |
| [23:11] <i4x> geser and albert23: I changed debian/rules with 'dh_install --sourcedir=/home/i4/Desktop/final/package2' | |
| [23:12] <i4x> and moved the folder 'tmp' from debian/ to /home/i4/Desktop/final/package2/ | |
| [23:13] <i4x> now the tmp is available to dh_install ! | |
| [23:14] <geser> how did you create the files in debian/tmp before? | |
| [23:15] <geser> i4x: I guess you don't need the --sourcedir anymore which has also the advantage that other people can build the package too | |
| [23:16] <i4x> geser: before, I moved the files to debian/tmp.. | |
| [23:19] <geser> i4x: which is bad as dh_clean removes the debian/tmp dir as that's where usually make install temporarily installs the build source and dh_install moves the files from there to the specified locations | |
| [23:20] <i4x> and this is only a practice exercise. I'm making a mini-project to Sistem Programming (school).. but as I ever wanted to know how the packages are made, I decided to deliver de mini-project in one package! so I don't need to burn virtual-machines nor a big manual to the teacher evaluate! now, the teacher just installs the package! | |
| [23:26] <i4x> geser and albert23: thank you a lot for the help and time spent! See you someday.. I hope have some time to start building some decent packages! and learn how to fix some bugs! :D | |
| [23:30] <nxvl> siretart: around? | |