| [01:01] <ubotu> New bug: #212709 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "atieventsd crashed with SIGSEGV in _XSend()" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212709 | |
| [01:31] <ubotu> New bug: #215449 in xorg (main) "Keyboard becomes unresponsive in X" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215449 | |
| [07:46] <tjaalton> damn atieventsd.. it should probably be disabled | |
| [08:06] <ubotu> New bug: #207108 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "ATI driver enabled 8.04 don't start" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207108 | |
| [08:40] <tjaalton> mvo: I've noticed a possible problem with x11-common and dapper->hardy upgrades.. x11-common Replaces xrgb (<= 1.0.0-0ubuntu2) but the package in dapper has an epoch, so the rule doesn't work? | |
| [08:41] <tjaalton> this is also bug 212672 | |
| [08:41] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 212672 in xorg "couldn't upgrade to hardy from dapper" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212672 | |
| [08:41] <mvo> tjaalton: good catch, the epoch is needed | |
| [08:42] <tjaalton> mvo: ok, I'll add it | |
| [08:45] <ubotu> New bug: #215456 in update-manager (main) "Upgrade failed (dup-of: 205079)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215456 | |
| [08:51] <mvo> bug 215456 makes me slightly nervous, it seems to be nvidia releated | |
| [08:51] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 215456 in update-manager "Upgrade failed (dup-of: 205079)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215456 | |
| [08:51] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 205079 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 "kubuntu Hardy Heron could not install libc6" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205079 | |
| [08:51] <mvo> do you know if we had tls in gutsy too? | |
| [08:55] <tjaalton> nvidia-glx installed the non-tls version in /usr/lib until a few weeks ago | |
| [08:56] <mvo> hm, ok | |
| [08:56] <mvo> I wonder how these people got the bug then | |
| [10:27] <seb128> bug #196464 | |
| [10:27] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 196464 in gdm "After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196464 | |
| [10:27] <seb128> interesting comment | |
| [10:28] <seb128> what is atieventsd and why does it .Xauthority? | |
| [10:28] <tjaalton> sigh | |
| [10:28] <seb128> does it change | |
| [10:28] <tjaalton> it's some crappy daemon for multihead | |
| [10:30] <tjaalton> I'm all for disabling it by default | |
| [10:30] <tjaalton> it only generates grief from what I can tell | |
| [10:31] <seb128> ok, I'll wait to see if other people have the same issue | |
| [10:31] <seb128> and reassign | |
| [10:35] <tjaalton> ok | |
| [11:01] <ubotu> New bug: #215585 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "[Hardy] Complete system freeze when scrolling using fglrx" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215585 | |
| [11:35] <ubotu> New bug: #196464 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "After gdm upgrade no X cliens can be run" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/196464 | |
| [13:11] <ubotu> New bug: #206703 in kdebase (main) "[hardy] kde fail to start if keyboard native langage maps are activated (dup-of: 205979)" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206703 | |
| [13:17] <seb128> james_w: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215396 | |
| [13:17] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 215396 in gnome-control-center "gnome-display-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in _start() [when running xgl]" [Medium,New] | |
| [13:18] <james_w> seb128: I'm just testing a "fix" for that. | |
| [13:18] <james_w> it's the same issue we solved for g-s-d and Xgl I think | |
| [13:18] <seb128> james_w: ok, good ;-) | |
| [13:18] <james_w> however the capplet is missing a NULL check so it crashes. | |
| [13:19] <seb128> scr=0x0 | |
| [13:19] <seb128> indeed | |
| [13:28] <Q-FUNK> hm. dak@debian seems to be in limbo. got the upload ack mail more than 3 hours ago, but still no install mail. | |
| [13:35] <jcristau> Q-FUNK: you built with the new dpkg | |
| [13:35] <jcristau> Q-FUNK: and dak didn't like that until a few minutes ago | |
| [13:41] <Q-FUNK> oh? | |
| [13:41] <jcristau> see the thread on -devel | |
| [13:41] <Q-FUNK> ok | |
| [13:42] <Q-FUNK> jcristau: title of the thread? | |
| [13:43] <jcristau> something with dak in it | |
| [13:43] <Q-FUNK> Are Sha* checksums accepted by dak ? | |
| [13:44] <jcristau> yes | |
| [13:45] <Q-FUNK> ok | |
| [13:45] <Q-FUNK> except that I never received the rejection mail. I received the confirmation for the upload, then nothing. | |
| [13:45] <jcristau> the upload was probably put on hold | |
| [13:46] <jcristau> and reinjected after the dak fix | |
| [13:47] <Q-FUNK> hopefully :) | |
| [13:47] <Q-FUNK> thanks for the pointer, anyhow | |
| [13:53] <ubotu> New bug: #215584 in xserver-xorg-video-ati "compiz freeze with ATI Radeon X600" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215584 | |
| [15:07] <ubotu> New bug: #215702 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "Hardy: fglrx + compiz (dexktop effects) not working right" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215702 | |
| [15:50] <Q-FUNK> hm. still nothing from the damn buildd. | |
| [15:57] <ubotu> New bug: #215728 in xorg (main) "High CPU Consumption" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215728 | |
| [16:12] <komputes> Q-FUNK: any progress of the geode driver? | |
| [16:12] <Q-FUNK> komputes: yes, waiting for debian to get its package builders back into shape | |
| [16:13] <komputes> Q-FUNK: great, if you need me to test it I have the hardware, so just ping me when that time comes | |
| [16:15] <jcristau> geode isn't autobuilt, so 'package builders' have nothing to do with that... | |
| [16:16] <Q-FUNK> hm? | |
| [16:16] <Q-FUNK> the buildd have a deprecated dpkg-dev and silently reject packages that use a recent one. | |
| [16:17] <Q-FUNK> and whoever was supposed to re-queue packages evidently missed one | |
| [16:17] <jcristau> no | |
| [16:18] <Q-FUNK> how else do you explain this then? | |
| [16:20] <jcristau> i don't know why you're talking about buildds | |
| [16:27] <Q-FUNK> then don't say no. | |
| [16:44] <ubotu> New bug: #24582 in xkeyboard-config ""Back" and "Forward" buttons should work out of the box in Firefox" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24582 | |
| [16:48] <james_w> seb128: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6770/# | |
| [16:49] <james_w> do you think the message is ok? | |
| [16:51] <seb128> james_w: there is already a message displayed when the capplet can't be used no? | |
| [16:51] <james_w> yes, there is | |
| [16:52] <james_w> I'm not sure exactly what the problem here is though. It has already checked that xrandr 1.2 is available | |
| [16:52] <james_w> but it still doesn't work, it's probably a driver bug I think | |
| [16:52] <seb128> I think that's a xgl issue | |
| [16:52] <james_w> or Xgl in this case | |
| [16:52] <seb128> the driver is likely xrandr capable | |
| [16:52] <seb128> but xgl might not be | |
| [16:52] <seb128> or something | |
| [16:53] <seb128> james_w: about the message, why do you need a new one if we already have one? I'm concerned about translations | |
| [16:54] <james_w> ah yes | |
| [16:54] <james_w> it's just the way the code is layed out | |
| [16:54] <james_w> also I wasn't sure about re-using it if it's not the same problem. | |
| [16:55] <seb128> what is the other problem? | |
| [16:55] <seb128> and I think your message is too technical | |
| [16:55] <seb128> users don't know what xrandr is | |
| [16:56] <seb128> we should just display a "your graphical setup doesn't support dynamic configuration change" or similar | |
| [16:56] <james_w> "The X Server does not support the XRandR extension. Runtime resolution changes to the display size are not available." | |
| [16:56] <james_w> "The version of the XRandR extension is incompatible with this program. Runtime changes to the display size are not available." | |
| [16:57] <james_w> that's the two existing messages. | |
| [16:57] <seb128> bah | |
| [16:57] <seb128> I would use the first one | |
| [16:58] <james_w> ok, I'll change it | |
| [16:59] <seb128> do you agree about the not breaking translations? | |
| [16:59] <james_w> yeah, that's important. | |
| [16:59] <seb128> I don't want to dictate decisions ;-) | |
| [16:59] <seb128> ok, cool | |
| [19:57] <ubotu> New bug: #215778 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "2.6.24-16.30 kernel update - nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215778 | |
| [21:26] <ubotu> New bug: #215399 in firefox-3.0 (main) "firefox beta 3 does not always display images (dup-of: 182038)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215399 | |
| [23:01] <ubotu> New bug: #215976 in ubuntu "nvidia driver not found with 2.6.24-16 kernel(64 bit) (dup-of: 215778)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/215976 | |