|
[00:00] <asac> Volans: i don't test if it works, but it builds properly at least |
|
[00:00] <fta> mozilla bug 426565 |
|
[00:00] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 426565 in Plug-ins "Firefox 3 crashes with Java applets" [Blocker,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426565 |
|
[00:00] <Volans> good! I'm checking the other extension for the control file |
|
[00:00] <asac> Volans: take a look at a few |
|
[00:00] <asac> not that you accidentially look at one of the few bad examples |
|
[00:00] <asac> ? |
|
[00:00] <asac> ;) |
|
[00:01] <Volans> ok ;) |
|
[00:02] <asac> fta: i don't think thats related to the crashes you see |
|
[00:02] <fta> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=746777 |
|
[00:03] <fta> i don't see java crashes, i barely use java |
|
[00:03] <fta> i see frequent flash crashes |
|
[00:04] <asac> fta: since you see issue, can you see if you can reproduce with instructinos on bug 212883 |
|
[00:04] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 212883 in firefox-3.0 "firefox crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() - Flashplugin nonfree" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212883 |
|
[00:04] <asac> is that guy seeing the same crash? |
|
[00:07] <asac> fta: does that forum thing crash X for you too? |
|
[00:08] <fta> i haven't tried.. I have zillions of windows opened on my desktop |
|
[00:08] <fta> ;P |
|
[00:11] <fta> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6541/ |
|
[00:13] <fta> asac, i think we should keep our patch, it's too late for hardy, what do you think? |
|
[00:13] <asac> yeah i think we should stay buggy ;) |
|
[00:14] <asac> i doubt that its gone |
|
[00:14] <asac> which version do we have |
|
[00:15] <fta> 1.4.0.90 or something like that |
|
[00:16] <asac> yeah |
|
[00:16] <asac> i think its obvious |
|
[00:16] <asac> :) |
|
[00:17] <asac> they align with fedora release? |
|
[00:20] <asac> fta: yay, toolkit@mozilla.org works |
|
[00:20] <asac> now i am happy ;) |
|
[00:20] <fta> what for ? |
|
[00:20] <fta> bug 211791 |
|
[00:21] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 211791 in cairo "Please sponsor cairo 1.5.16-0ubuntu1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/211791 |
|
[00:21] <asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6543/ |
|
[00:22] <fta> oh |
|
[00:22] <asac> fta: you attached the wrong debdiff ;) |
|
[00:22] <fta> when will the langpacks be released ? |
|
[00:22] <asac> 23 apr :) |
|
[00:22] <fta> no, it's my old bug, i'm updating it |
|
[00:23] <asac> k |
|
[00:23] <fta> 23 apr ?? |
|
[00:23] <asac> one day before release ;) |
|
[00:23] <asac> just kidding |
|
[00:24] <asac> asap is the only answer i have right now ;) |
|
[00:24] <Volans> asac: I don't know if here is the right place, I have noticed that if the it_IT locale is set on hardy, FF3beta5 has the english layout and the Lithuanian (lt) welcome page at start. I don't know where is checked the current locale in the installation process |
|
[00:24] <asac> Volans: thats expected |
|
[00:24] <asac> its our contribution to the worlds level on english education ;) |
|
[00:25] <asac> Volans: no, like what we just talked about ... langpacks are baking longer than expected ;) |
|
[00:25] <Volans> for english no problem... but Lithuanian welcome page??? I think is a mistyping between "lt" and "it", the welcome pages are all correctly created |
|
[00:26] <asac> Volans: yes thats an ubufox bug iirc |
|
[00:26] <asac> its fix committe |
|
[00:26] <asac> d |
|
[00:26] <asac> next upload will fix that bug |
|
[00:26] <Volans> ok, I have searched in the bugs but non found it, my fault |
|
[00:27] <asac> bug 212446 |
|
[00:27] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 212446 in ubufox "[Hardy] Ubufox locale for IT-it set to lt (Lithuanian)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/212446 |
|
[00:27] <asac> well, fixed in upstream branch for now |
|
[00:28] <asac> but given that next release will be 0.5 final, thats fix committed |
|
[00:28] <asac> bug 212446 |
|
[00:29] <asac> fta: your extension script ... maybe it should be included in a mozilla-extensiontools branch/package ;) |
|
[00:29] <asac> hehe |
|
[00:30] <asac> or just mozilla-devscripts;) |
|
[00:30] <fta> why not. |
|
[00:30] <asac> but actually i woul dlikel to keep devscripts something oyu have in build-dependencies |
|
[00:30] <asac> so maybe use mozilla-devtools ;) |
|
[00:30] <asac> for binary helpers of all kind |
|
[00:30] <asac> binary aka executable |
|
[00:32] <asac> mozillateam-tools ;) |
|
[00:32] <fta> but this is still a script useful only to us |
|
[00:32] <asac> yes |
|
[00:32] <asac> so using a team name ... for now just a branch |
|
[00:33] <asac> but i want to throw my LP bugs python scripts in there as well |
|
[00:33] <asac> which might be useful for others |
|
[01:23] <fta> mozilla bug 419715 |
|
[01:23] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 419715 in GFX: Thebes "Upgrade cairo to 1.6 final or as-close-as-possible" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419715 |
|
[01:24] <fta> but backed out just after... |
|
[01:39] <asac> ok night |
|
[05:54] <[reed]> asac: still need me? |
|
=== asac_ is now known as asac |
|
=== rzr is now known as rZr |
|
[08:54] <asac> [reed]: yeah ;) |
|
[08:54] <[reed]> oh? |
|
[08:54] <asac> [reed]: but let me get some coffee first ;) |
|
[08:55] <asac> ~5 min |
|
[09:02] <asac> mozilla bug 386844 |
|
[09:02] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 386844 in Plug-ins "Crash when running Java Applets [@ XSync - JavaPluginInstance5::SetWindow]" [Critical,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386844 |
|
[09:03] <asac> bug 207907 |
|
[09:03] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 207907 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 Beta 4 crashed while displaying a flash-popup" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207907 |
|
[09:04] <asac> [reed]: look at the comment in launchpad bug please |
|
[09:05] <[reed]> so, file a new a bug, mark it as a regression, make it block that bug |
|
[09:05] <asac> so why was the window setting code moved after CreateXEmbedWindow is called in the moz bug above |
|
[09:05] <[reed]> and request blocking |
|
[09:05] <[reed]> and cc karlt |
|
[09:05] <asac> hey ;) |
|
[09:05] <[reed]> if you want to talk to karlt first, ping him :p |
|
[09:06] <asac> yeah |
|
[09:06] <[reed]> just because I land a patch doesn't mean I have anything to do with it :) |
|
[09:06] <asac> hehe |
|
[09:07] <fta> mozilla bug 427385 |
|
[09:07] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 427385 in GFX: Thebes "april 6th ff3 trunk crash when opening this huge PNG [XError: 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)']" [Critical,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427385 |
|
[09:08] <fta> hi |
|
[09:11] <[reed]> hi, fta |
|
[09:17] <asac> fta: do you see any messages on console when flash crashes for you? |
|
[09:18] <fta> none that i remember |
|
[09:18] <fta> and gdb stack is often unusable |
|
[09:19] <fta> it even often crashes gdb |
|
[09:21] <asac> fta: can you break at http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/modules/plugin/base/src/nsPluginNativeWindowGtk2.cpp#176 |
|
[09:21] <asac> ? |
|
[09:21] <asac> and see whats parent_win at that point? |
|
[09:22] <asac> or add some printf |
|
[09:27] <fta> i will but not now, i'm working |
|
[09:28] <asac> yeah |
|
[10:07] <asac> fta: debian bug 449448 closed :/ |
|
[10:07] <ubotu> Debian bug 449448 in xulrunner "Please package xulrunner 1.9 in the upstream way" [Wishlist,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/449448 |
|
[10:11] <asac> apparently mike decided to not use a patch system |
|
[10:11] <asac> great |
|
[10:11] <asac> have fun |
|
[11:45] <asac> carlos: did the b5 upload go well? |
|
[11:45] <carlos> asac: no, it was not extracted from the package |
|
[11:45] <carlos> did pitti installed the updated script on buildds? |
|
[11:45] <asac> ydes |
|
[11:46] <carlos> hmm |
|
[11:46] <asac> carlos: pkgstriptranslations: preparing translation tarball xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_i386_translations.tar.gz...done (1 files) |
|
[11:46] <asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13134827/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.xulrunner-1.9_1.9~b5%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz |
|
[11:47] <carlos> I'm working on some open bugs for firefox, I will review the process in our side, maybe we are assuming .po or .pot files... |
|
[11:55] <carlos> asac: btw, did you manage to get back an .xpi file from the export I gave to you? |
|
[11:55] <asac> carlos: i am currently working on the process to prodduce the packages we want to ship for hardy |
|
[11:55] <carlos> from the language pack, right? |
|
[11:56] <asac> carlos: yes |
|
[11:56] <asac> a script that produces .deb package structures from the complete export |
|
[11:56] <asac> ... doing that i will see if it something broke |
|
[11:57] <asac> but i could get a working .xpi from the previous exports you gave me |
|
[11:57] <carlos> cool! |
|
[11:57] <asac> so i hope that it didn't change anything (except improvements) |
|
[11:57] <carlos> :-) |
|
[11:57] <asac> i had some issue with accesskeys ... but i have to look closer whats going on |
|
[11:58] <asac> i think it were just untranslated ones |
|
[11:58] <carlos> if you have something I can debug, is the right time |
|
[11:58] <carlos> I'm going to request a patch cherry pick into production for some remaining problems with xpi support |
|
[11:58] <asac> carlos: ok ... ill give you feedback today |
|
[11:59] <carlos> so is a good time to get that fixed now or will need to wait until the end of the month (only minor fixes, please) |
|
[11:59] <carlos> asac: cool |
|
[11:59] <asac> what are the problems you are seeing? |
|
[12:05] <asac> carlos: the really bad thing is that i couldn't go through german translations still |
|
[12:05] <asac> nobody replied |
|
[12:05] <asac> so i am not a translator |
|
[12:05] <asac> carlos: does the cherry pick include to use the suggestion if there is only one suggestion? |
|
[12:05] <asac> that should eliminate a lot of those not auto translated keys |
|
[12:07] <carlos> no, that's nothing I can do in a reliable way because that's only true today, but when translators start doing suggestions, I cannot control that... |
|
[12:08] <asac> carlos: right ... but it would give us a better start |
|
[12:09] <asac> now we have 500 untranslated strings per language |
|
[12:09] <carlos> asac: the problem is that Launchpad production is nothing that could have some code running and then easily disable it. I don't have direct access to the server and I need to follow some procedures |
|
[12:10] <asac> carlos: but if ... after import of translation ... there is no translation, but only one translation that was just imported, we could auto approve that ;) |
|
[12:10] <carlos> which is good for a good QA, but makes impossible those fast and easy temp hacks |
|
[12:10] <asac> s/one translation/one suggestion/ |
|
[12:10] <carlos> asac: that's not completely true, even if that's what it shows in the UI |
|
[12:10] <asac> ? |
|
[12:10] <carlos> the problem is that we are getting a context string |
|
[12:10] <carlos> that shouldn't be there |
|
[12:11] <carlos> so the messages are different in our database |
|
[12:11] <carlos> however, the suggestion system ignores that context string |
|
[12:11] <carlos> and that's why it appears there |
|
[12:11] <asac> k |
|
[12:11] <carlos> but we cannot ignore the context string to approve automatically translations |
|
[12:12] <carlos> or that would make useless the context feature. The proper fix is to stop adding those context string... but that' snot trivial to fix as a cherrypick, it needs to wait until the next rollout (end of the month) |
|
[12:12] <asac> ok ... lets hope that translators are more responsive than the leads of the german team |
|
[14:10] <asac> carlos: we already fixed that accesskey-accept was empty right? |
|
[14:11] <carlos> well, it should be fixed. Did you get it again in the tarball I gave you last week? |
|
[14:11] <carlos> if it's still there, it may be something else |
|
[14:12] <asac> carlos: no ... i ended up approvin suggestions and found that its still on lp |
|
[14:12] <carlos> I see |
|
[14:13] <carlos> ok, I will take a look to it too |
|
[14:14] <asac> carlos: i still see a bunch of ... uk.po:msgid "accesskey-accept" |
|
[14:14] <asac> in the tarball you gave me |
|
[14:14] <carlos> if there is at least one, it's normal that we get more of one.... |
|
[14:14] <asac> sure |
|
[14:14] <asac> s/bunch// |
|
[14:14] <asac> :) |
|
[14:15] <asac> appears they are still processed like accesskeys were processed in the past |
|
[14:27] <asac> carlos: intl.charset.detector is a not accesskey that has the same issue |
|
[14:27] <carlos> as I said, the fact that you have the key maybe just that, for some reason, we are missing the translation from en-US |
|
[14:27] <carlos> so my bet is that is not really related with accesskeys |
|
[14:28] <asac> ok |
|
[14:28] <asac> carlos: ok ... thought it was a left over from accesskey special treatment in the past |
|
[14:29] <asac> ok, i assume you don't need more examples/infos about untranslated english texts then :) |
|
[14:31] <carlos> I hope there is only one single cause for that problem ;-) |
|
[15:09] <asac> carlos: there are also others that have a valid english text, but the right translation doesn't show up as suggestion: |
|
[15:09] <asac> Located in en-US.xpi/en-US.jar!/locale/browser/pageReport.dtd(caption.label) |
|
[15:09] <asac> English: Copy text |
|
[15:10] <asac> Blocked Pop-ups |
|
[15:10] <asac> but those appear to be really rare |
|
[15:11] <asac> hmm at least there is a line. the next that has this problem has as key "caption.label" ... as well |
|
[15:12] <asac> carlos: do you wnat a few examples for such keys? |
|
[16:20] <carlos> asac: if you you think they follow the same failure pattern, a single example is enough |
|
[16:21] <asac> carlos: i cannot tell. most are like accesskey: "the key is in english text" |
|
[16:21] <asac> carlos: but some have an english text that is valid, but no suggestion at all |
|
[16:21] <asac> and others have two suggestions that don't fit |
|
[16:22] <asac> either only two suggestions are displayed (?) or the german translation was not parsed |
|
[16:23] <carlos> if you talk about lack of translations, but not that the English string is the ID |
|
[16:23] <carlos> forget about it |
|
[16:23] <carlos> that's all the same problem |
|
[16:23] <carlos> and it will make no sense when you look at the data, the problem depends on how the translator prepared the original .xpi file |
|
[16:23] <asac> ok ... so: 1) lack of translation -> triaged |
|
[16:23] <asac> 2) keys as english text -> Not yet known? |
|
[16:24] <carlos> that's why I told you we cannot do the autoapproval as you suggested |
|
[16:24] <carlos> asac: right |
|
[16:24] <asac> carlos: but lack of suggestions falls into 1) ? |
|
[16:29] <carlos> asac: I think so, yes |
|
[17:53] <Volans> asac: in LP to create the brach for my extension, I have to register a branch here? https://code.edge.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions/+branches |
|
[17:53] <Volans> s/brach/branch |
|
[17:53] <asac> Volans: no you just need to push |
|
[17:53] <asac> Volans: look at the push instructions documented on other branches |
|
[17:54] <asac> well .. bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~$USERID/firefox-extensions/YOUREXTENSION.ubuntu |
|
[17:54] <asac> well .. bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~$USERID/firefox-extensions/YOUREXTENSION.upstream |
|
[17:54] <asac> thats where you need to push |
|
[17:54] <asac> USERID is your launchpad accountname |
|
=== rZr is now known as Rz |
|
=== Rz is now known as RzR |
|
[18:05] <shirish> asac: fta: either of u guys online |
|
[18:06] <shirish> asac: any idea when we will have firebug? |
|
[18:10] <asac> shirish: isn't it avail? |
|
[18:11] <shirish> asac: nope, it isn't, I just did a search |
|
[18:11] <shirish> aptitude search firebug |
|
[18:11] <shirish> no results |
|
[18:12] <asac> shirish: its still in binary NEW |
|
[18:12] <asac> be patient for another day or so |
|
[18:12] <shirish> ok, will do :( |
|
[18:13] <shirish> try to catch an archive admin (perhaps hobbsee and see if it can put up) |
|
[18:15] <asac> shirish: yes, if hobsee is around that would be a good thing |
|
[18:16] <cwong1> asac: morning |
|
[18:16] <asac> cwong1: hi |
|
[18:16] <cwong1> asac: how can I tell the package that I uploaded last Friday to ppa built ok? |
|
[18:17] <asac> cwong1: did you get an "Accept" mail? |
|
[18:17] <cwong1> yes |
|
[18:17] <asac> cwong1: if so, not getting a "failed to build" is a good indicator that it worked |
|
[18:17] <cwong1> asac: ok |
|
[18:17] <asac> cwong1: otherwise you can look at the +archive webpage |
|
[18:17] <asac> and see the .debs there |
|
[18:17] <cwong1> asac: tx |
|
[18:18] <asac> cwong1: you can get to that page from the teams sstartpage on launchpad |
|
[18:18] <asac> cwong1: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mobile |
|
[18:18] <asac> cwong1: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mobile/+archive |
|
[18:19] <cwong1> asac: got it |
|
[18:19] <asac> looks like there are debs available |
|
[18:19] <asac> are those xul builds? |
|
[18:19] <asac> look pretty big to me |
|
[18:19] <asac> (for system-xul) |
|
[18:20] <cwong1> I modified the debian/rule file to build with system-xul. so it should be unless I screwed up somehow |
|
[18:20] <cwong1> I will look into it. |
|
[18:20] <asac> looks lke there are at least parts of xul |
|
[18:21] <asac> $ ls /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b3/chrome/*.manifest |
|
[18:21] <asac> /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b3/chrome/browser.manifest /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b3/chrome/en-US.manifest |
|
[18:21] <asac> /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b3/chrome/classic.manifest /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b3/chrome/reporter.manifest |
|
[18:21] <asac> thats what is in firefox 3.0 system-xul build in chrome |
|
[18:22] <fta> yop |
|
[18:22] <asac> hmm definitly a full build judging from the build times |
|
[18:23] <asac> cwong1: did you push that to git yet? |
|
[18:24] <asac> hmm .... git has --with-libxul-sdk=$(ls -d /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9*) |
|
[18:24] <cwong1> asac: I pushed it to the hardy branch last friday and did a release. |
|
[18:24] <Volans> asac: another quite stupid question, the extension is compatible also with Flock, I have to do something special for that? The deb actually install only in FF obviously |
|
[18:24] <asac> fta: do you see anything that might break system-xul in tree: http://www.moblin.org/repos/?p=projects/mobile-browser.git;a=tree;h=hardy;hb=hardy |
|
[18:24] <asac> well go to hardy branch (bottom of page) |
|
[18:24] <cwong1> asac: does the build system use my debian directory for the build? |
|
[18:25] <asac> cwong1: it will whatever you uploaded |
|
[18:26] <asac> use |
|
[18:27] <asac> cwong1: i see the fault :) |
|
[18:27] <asac> cwong1: look at the build log: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13124817/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.midbrowser_0.3.0b5a-1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz |
|
[18:27] <asac> and search for --with-libxul-sdk |
|
[18:27] <asac> what do you see ;) |
|
[18:28] <cwong1> asac: blank |
|
[18:28] <asac> cwong1: you should really really consider to use the debian/ dir of our firefox tree |
|
[18:29] <asac> especially because we are late in release ... there are other tweaks in like overwriting LDFLAGS |
|
[18:29] <asac> because you might end up in crashes otherwise |
|
[18:29] <asac> at least unset LDFLAGS in rules |
|
[18:29] <asac> cwong1: why is it blank ;)? |
|
[18:30] <asac> cwong1: hint, build-dependencies (without looking) |
|
[18:30] <cwong1> asac: I think it didn't like it becuase it was in a variable assingment.. bad idea |
|
[18:31] <asac> cwong1: you lack xulrunner-1.9-dev in control (thats my guess). so it falls back to in-source xul |
|
[18:32] <asac> cwong1: pbuilder is a good tool to test local builds in a buildd like environment |
|
[18:33] <cwong1> asac: I am sure I have xulrunner-1.9-dev in my control file |
|
[18:33] <asac> hmm ... $$ ? |
|
[18:33] <asac> cwong1: we have |
|
[18:33] <asac> DEBIAN_XUL_DEV := $(wildcard /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9*) |
|
[18:33] <asac> and --with-libxul-sdk=$(DEBIAN_XUL_DEV) |
|
[18:34] <cwong1> asac: I am going to set up a local build system to do the test build before I upload a fix. |
|
[18:34] <cwong1> asac: I will fix it do a test build before my next upload today...:( |
|
[18:34] <Volans> asac: I have to add and commit only the pure code or also the ./debian/ folder and/or other files? (I have seen various preactice in other extensions) |
|
[18:35] <asac> cwong1: if that doesn't consume much time ... good. otherwise as long as its not like 10 tries uploading to ppa should be fine ;) |
|
[18:35] <asac> or pbuilder |
|
[18:35] <asac> Volans: take a look at the packagin page in wiki |
|
[18:35] <asac> Volans: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Firefox3Extensions/Packaging |
|
[18:36] <asac> in short: you should create an .upstream branch with only your extension files in ... and a .ubuntu branch based on that ... with the debian/ dir |
|
[18:38] <Volans> ok, thanks, I'm checking in the wiki |
|
[19:14] <fta> asac, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devtools |
|
[19:16] <asac> fta: cool ;) |
|
[19:16] <asac> a glorious start |
|
[19:22] <fta> :) |
|
[19:31] <Jazzva> asac, have you took a look at foxyproxy? (Maybe you missed it yesterday, I mentioned it was done while you were away) |
|
[19:32] <fta> Jazzva, http://paste.ubuntu.com/6571/ |
|
[19:33] <Jazzva> Great work, fta :). That will help a lot with new upstream versions checking :)... |
|
[19:33] <Jazzva> BTW, I forgot to ask you yesterday... Mind if I take a look at the source? I would like to learn something from it... |
|
[19:33] <fta> my code is now a new branch: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devtools |
|
[19:34] <fta> +in |
|
[19:34] <Jazzva> aaah, great... Will branch it and take a look :). |
|
[19:36] <Jazzva> btw, is it possible to push extensions in backports, once new upstream versions come out? |
|
[19:36] <Jazzva> *to backports... |
|
[19:37] <fta> for gutsy ? |
|
[19:37] <Jazzva> no, I meant for hardy... |
|
[19:38] <Jazzva> Once hardy comes out, we start packaging new upstream versions for interpid (not too catchy :)). Is it possible to push them to hardy too? |
|
[19:39] <fta> i don't really know the backports rules |
|
[19:39] <Jazzva> Hmm... maybe wiki knows something... or ubotu |
|
[19:39] <Jazzva> !backports |
|
[19:39] <ubotu> If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging |
|
[19:39] <Jazzva> ahhh :) |
|
[19:39] <fta> :) |
|
[19:44] <fta> so, did you learn something ? |
|
[19:44] <Jazzva> It might... |
|
[19:44] <fta> it's not rocket science |
|
[19:45] <fta> kind of hackish |
|
[19:45] <Jazzva> Candidates for version updates are primarily desktop applications, such as your web browser, word processor, IRC client, or IM client. |
|
[19:45] <Jazzva> Extensions are browser related ... :) |
|
[19:46] <fta> I meant, from my script ;) |
|
[19:46] <Jazzva> Oh... haven't seen it yet... |
|
[19:46] <Jazzva> :ashamed: |
|
[19:47] <Jazzva> branching... |
|
[19:48] <fta> there's just 1 file |
|
[19:49] <Jazzva> and it's still not done, for some reason unknown to me :/ |
|
[19:49] <Jazzva> looking in the browser... |
|
[19:50] <Jazzva> typo... "porject" :) |
|
[19:51] <fta> ? |
|
[19:51] <Jazzva> PORJECT=firefox-extensions |
|
[19:51] <fta> oh |
|
[19:51] <Jazzva> nothing big :) |
|
[19:53] <fta> strange that it worked... |
|
[19:53] <Jazzva> You used it in second line too ;) |
|
[19:54] <fta> and later |
|
[19:54] <Jazzva> but then, there are lines which say "project" |
|
[19:54] <Jazzva> interesting :) |
|
[19:55] <fta> fixed |
|
[19:55] <jetsaredim_> anyone here an ebay user? I seem to get firefox to crash consistently when I try to login to ebay |
|
[19:55] <Jazzva> Funny ... Xchat is still crashing for me, when I right click on a nickname... I might report a bug |
|
[19:58] <Jazzva> Script is cool :)... |
|
[19:58] <Jazzva> And there's a lot for me to learn :) |
|
[20:22] <fta> http://glandium.org/blog/?p=191 |
|
[20:50] <asac> Jazzva: usully backports are constrained by the man power available to do them |
|
[20:52] <Jazzva> so, we can at least try? :) |
|
[20:56] <fta> with a script, it requires low man power :) |
|
[20:56] <Jazzva> at our side... there are testers that need to test it... I think that's mentioned on backport wiki page |
|
[20:58] <fta> just create a ff-extension-backport ppa and push to there whenever you have a new release in ubuntu+1, this is quite easy to script |
|
[22:38] <fta> asac, it crashes also when playing several video files with either totem or vlc plugins. The 1st video is fine, the 2nd crashes |
|
[22:45] <fta> damn, xul trunk crash on startup |
|
[22:49] <fta> my prism profile is corrupted :( |
|
[23:23] <asac> fta: damn |
|
[23:23] <asac> why is the crash not that frequent here |
|
[23:23] <asac> hmm |
|
[23:24] <asac> i could reproduce one flash on youtube |
|
[23:24] <asac> but never after |
|
|