|
=== Varka_ is now known as Varka |
|
[05:19] <mruiz> @schedule Santiago |
|
[05:38] <ubotu> Schedule for America/Santiago: 12 Mar 17:00: Server Team | 14 Mar 16:00: MOTU | 14 Mar 17:00: REVU Coordination | 19 Mar 17:00: Server Team | 26 Mar 17:00: Server Team |
|
=== cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson |
|
[06:57] <calc> hi |
|
[06:57] <ogra> yawn |
|
[06:57] <evand> hello |
|
[06:57] <TheMuso> Greetings. |
|
[06:57] * ogra feels like sh*t |
|
[06:57] * asac waves (in time) |
|
[06:58] <bryce> heya |
|
[06:58] <cjwatson> we are out of coffee! argh |
|
[06:58] <asac> lol |
|
[06:58] * cjwatson attempts to survive on juice alone |
|
[06:58] * ArneGoetje waves |
|
[06:58] <ogra> hard thing |
|
[06:58] <TheMuso> cjwatson: I've always found a morning walk gets me woken up. :) |
|
[06:58] <cjwatson> bit late :) |
|
[06:58] <TheMuso> Yeah I know, but nevertheless, its the suggestino that counts. |
|
[06:58] <TheMuso> suggestino |
|
[06:58] <TheMuso> ugh |
|
[06:58] <cjwatson> ta :) |
|
[06:58] <TheMuso> suggestion |
|
[06:59] <ogra> el suggestino ? |
|
[06:59] <cjwatson> so just waiting for doko |
|
[06:59] <ogra> he was in distro ... |
|
[06:59] <calc> evand: early enough for you? :) |
|
[06:59] <TheMuso> ogra: yeah slip of the fingers.... twice. |
|
[06:59] <cjwatson> doko: ping |
|
[07:00] <ogra> TheMuso, sounds like some kind of southamerican pimp :) |
|
[07:00] <doko> good morning |
|
[07:00] <TheMuso> ogra: I know. |
|
[07:00] <TheMuso> :) |
|
[07:00] <evand> calc: pff, a cakewalk |
|
[07:00] <cjwatson> aha, welcome |
|
[07:00] <cjwatson> right, I only have two activity reports this week; I hope that the rest are stuck in a mail queue (I think my mail reception doesn't work so well overnight for some reason) |
|
[07:01] * cjwatson blinks and realises he clearly can't count |
|
[07:01] * TheMuso saw a lot on the ml./ |
|
[07:01] <ArneGoetje> I just submitted mine a few minutes ago... sorry for that |
|
[07:01] * ogra just sent his ... with wrong date first place ... |
|
[07:01] <calc> cjwatson: more coffee? |
|
[07:01] <cjwatson> ah, I counted ogra twice and made it nine without bothering to check all the names :) sorry Steve |
|
[07:01] <slangasek> :-) |
|
[07:02] <cjwatson> ok, somebody else will have to say if there are agenda items in activity reports |
|
[07:02] <ogra> yeah, we're easy to mix up :P |
|
[07:02] <ArneGoetje> 2 in my one |
|
[07:03] <cjwatson> so I wanted to talk first about scim, since there has been a lot of user confusion about scim accidentally being enabled for them, and I want to make sure we have a clear plan to ensure this is fixed for beta |
|
[07:03] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: it is fixed already |
|
[07:03] <cjwatson> at the moment it looks like live CDs and fresh installs don't have it switched on, but that users sometimes get it enabled on upgrade |
|
[07:03] <cjwatson> ArneGoetje: somebody reported breakage on upgrade just yesterday |
|
[07:03] <asac> i don't know if i forcefully uninstalled it, but its not enabled for me anymore. it was rather annoying a week ago. |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> * scim enabled by default for non-CJK locales: This has been resolved |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> with the latest scim and scim-bridge updates. On a current Live CD the |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> old behaviour, where scim is by default disabled for non-CJK locales can |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> be observed. Upgrading from Gutsy to Hardy should work fine also, |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> however I haven't tested it yet. For users who followed the Hardy |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> development manual interaction is required though. Calling |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> Language-selector, unchecking the checkbox and doing a re-login should |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> be sufficient. |
|
[07:04] <calc> i had to go back to gutsy for my vmware session for other reason so i didn't see if it got fixed for my issue |
|
[07:04] <cjwatson> ArneGoetje: ah, is that a change since yesterday? |
|
[07:04] <calc> but it hasn't seemed to have affect my two hardy systems |
|
[07:04] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: no, I updated the packages a few days ago. |
|
[07:05] <cjwatson> ArneGoetje: there have been reports since then; the evidence suggests that upgrades are still broken |
|
[07:05] <cjwatson> somebody just yesterday reported upgrading from alpha-6 to current and having scim enabled |
|
[07:05] <ogra> i didnt have any trace of scim on yesterdays classmate image |
|
=== _czessi is now known as Czessi |
|
[07:06] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: for users who follow Hardy for a longer period, manual interaction is required to fix this. Language-selector -> uncek the checkbox -> re-login should fix it. |
|
[07:06] <slangasek> well, presumably neither I nor the other bug reporter followed the "calling language-selector" step? |
|
[07:06] <ogra> i mean of it getting in my way ... its installed indeed |
|
[07:06] <slangasek> OTOH, where *is* language-selector? I don't seem to have it on my system |
|
[07:06] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: Live CD from Mar 9 had it fixed already |
|
[07:06] <cjwatson> ArneGoetje: OK, I'll be happy if gutsy->hardy (and ideally also dapper->hardy) are tested for this before beta |
|
[07:06] <cjwatson> ArneGoetje: could you organise that? |
|
[07:07] <ArneGoetje> slangasek: System -> Administration -> Language Support |
|
[07:07] <cjwatson> slangasek: we should add Arne's comment above to the release notes |
|
[07:07] <slangasek> cjwatson: ack |
|
[07:07] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: will do. |
|
[07:07] <cjwatson> ArneGoetje: is there any way to sanely spot the breakage and revert it without also overwriting user customisations? |
|
[07:08] <cjwatson> three's been a lot of noise on #ubuntu-devel, #distro, #canonical, well just about everywhere about it |
|
[07:08] <cjwatson> Scott has been taking a lot of heat for it too |
|
[07:08] <cjwatson> (since everyone assumes it's a desktop thing) |
|
[07:08] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: not really... see my comments in bug #199030 |
|
[07:08] <slangasek> override the alternative on upgrade only if it's set to the expected value and we're upgrading from the problematic version? |
|
[07:09] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: short explanation: |
|
[07:10] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: some time in the past the function to enable/disable scim in language-selector broke and the link in /etc/X11/xinit/xinout.d/ for all_ALL was set by default. |
|
[07:11] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: as we cannot detect which user enabled it on purpose and who didn't, we cannot fix it by script, can we? |
|
[07:12] <ogra> you could ask |
|
[07:12] <slangasek> by "set by default", you mean "update-alternatives was misused from a maintainer script"? |
|
[07:12] <slangasek> or something else? |
|
[07:12] <ogra> like the directory conversion tool does |
|
[07:12] <ogra> its ugly but helps |
|
[07:12] <ArneGoetje> slangasek: I'm not sure what caused it actually.. I just remember that I couldn't uncheck the checkbox anymore... |
|
[07:12] <cjwatson> I'm not convinced that all these users had ever seen the language-selector UI |
|
[07:13] <slangasek> I hadn't :) |
|
[07:13] <cjwatson> it feels much more like an update-alternatives accident to me |
|
[07:13] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: as I said, I'm not sure what caused the breakage... |
|
[07:13] <calc> it affected my vmware image when i hadn't done anything with it, of course it wasn't a local fresh install (got it off the site) |
|
[07:13] <cjwatson> that means we need to be extra-careful about testing it |
|
[07:13] <calc> it was a image that was upgraded from gutsy |
|
[07:13] <cjwatson> if you aren't sure what caused it, it doesn't seem that you can say that it happened during hardy development |
|
[07:14] <cjwatson> and we should probably put some effort into tracking down what *did* cause it |
|
[07:14] <cjwatson> report is that alpha-6 -> current reproduces it, so perhaps we should start there |
|
[07:14] <ArneGoetje> the bug was triggered recently with the seeding of im-switch. when im-switch is not installed on the system, scim can't be started at all. that's why it hadn't surfaced earlier. |
|
[07:14] <cjwatson> indeed |
|
[07:15] <cjwatson> but it's a very serious problem when it does show up, so it is our responsibility to understand it as much as we can |
|
[07:15] <slangasek> * debian/scim.postinst: disable u-a calls for all_ALL; remove the |
|
[07:15] <slangasek> scim-bridge entries again... they should go into the scim-bridge package. |
|
[07:15] <cjwatson> while I'm happy with "hardy users have to do some magic to recover" if that's necessary, it would be better for that not to be required |
|
[07:16] <slangasek> ArneGoetje: that's from the most recent changelog on scim; what was the u-a call being disabled? |
|
[07:16] <ArneGoetje> slangasek: that was the fix, yes |
|
[07:16] <cjwatson> also, was the removal of those alternatives from postinst accompanied by a prerm change to remove existing alternatives on upgrade? |
|
[07:16] <slangasek> ArneGoetje: "what" was the u-a call being disabled? :) |
|
[07:17] <cjwatson> hmm, apparently those alternatives are unconditionally removed on upgrade |
|
[07:18] <cjwatson> slangasek: it's the one that's commented out in scim.postinst at the moment |
|
[07:18] <cjwatson> #ua_inst all_ALL scim 0 |
|
[07:18] <cjwatson> #ua_inst all_ALL scim-immodule 0 |
|
[07:18] <ArneGoetje> slangasek: before it was set to scim-bridge, as well as additiinal entries to scim and scim-immodule, but with lower priority. that was amistake |
|
[07:18] <slangasek> ok, those are just removals of calls to ua_inst(), which currently DTRT |
|
[07:18] <cjwatson> oh, no, I'm wrong |
|
[07:18] <slangasek> so it's not the culprit for the manual u-a |
|
[07:18] <cjwatson> ArneGoetje: we have some empirical evidence that update-alternatives has ended up in manual mode for the xinput-all_ALL alternative |
|
[07:18] <cjwatson> in the buggy cases |
|
[07:19] <cjwatson> this class of problem is traditionally an absolute bastard to track down, but usually worth it |
|
[07:19] <cjwatson> (and sometimes is a bug in update-alternatives, which is one of the least reliable programs in the dpkg toolchain) |
|
[07:19] <ArneGoetje> cjwatson: they will also be removed in prerm |
|
[07:20] <cjwatson> worst case, as ogra suggests, a debconf question on upgrade might be the least ugly solution |
|
[07:20] <slangasek> hrm, I don't remember if u-a --remove DT"R"T if called for an alternative in manual mode that's pointed at the entry you're removing |
|
[07:21] <slangasek> so the alternative was reported to be wrong in the alpha-6 liveCD? |
|
[07:21] <cjwatson> if ($mode eq "manual" and $state ne "expected" and (map { $hits += $apath eq $_ } @versions) and $hits and $linkname eq $apath) { |
|
[07:21] <cjwatson> &pr(_g("Removing manually selected alternative - switching to auto mode")); |
|
[07:21] <slangasek> should be traceable in that case |
|
[07:21] <cjwatson> $mode = "auto"; |
|
[07:21] <cjwatson> } |
|
[07:21] <cjwatson> it's supposed to, at least |
|
[07:21] <cjwatson> I'm not sure if it was desktop or alternate, the report wasn't detailed enough |
|
[07:22] <slangasek> cjwatson: well, that means that every package upgrade resets the value... |
|
[07:22] <slangasek> since they're all being unregistered in prerm and reregistered in postinst |
|
[07:22] <cjwatson> hah, yes, apparently |
|
[07:22] <cjwatson> this is one of the broken modes of update-alternatives use |
|
[07:22] <slangasek> yep |
|
[07:22] <cjwatson> (which is UNDOCUMENTED, gah policy rant) |
|
[07:23] <slangasek> so I'll dig into the livefs and see if I can confirm the broken alternative there |
|
[07:24] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 199030 in scim "Can't close SCIM" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199030 |
|
[07:24] <doko_> fixing bugs in update-alternatives for hardy+1 would be nice ... |
|
[07:24] * cjwatson would just like to say http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=71621 |
|
[07:24] <ubotu> Debian bug 71621 in debian-policy "No policy on calling update-alternatives (was Re: update-alternatives)" [Wishlist,Fixed] |
|
[07:24] <cjwatson> (which Manoj closed out of hand) |
|
[07:25] <slangasek> heh |
|
[07:25] <slangasek> you could reopen it now that Russ is a policy maintainer :-) |
|
[07:25] <cjwatson> I think I might |
|
[07:26] <cjwatson> slangasek: could you continue to work with Arne to try to nail this down? |
|
[07:26] <slangasek> yes |
|
[07:27] <cjwatson> great, thanks |
|
[07:27] <cjwatson> * Beta status |
|
[07:27] <cjwatson> I know we aren't quite frozen yet - anything interesting to report? |
|
[07:27] <TheMuso> Wubi installs onto FAT32 partitions are currently a non-event. |
|
[07:27] <cjwatson> I wonder if those should just plain be blacklisted |
|
[07:28] <cjwatson> "doctor, it hurts when I do this" |
|
[07:28] <slangasek> beta is the milestone where aaaaaall the bugs have landed that weren't critical for the alphas |
|
[07:28] <TheMuso> Spent time with Agostino today debugging a few things, but still an issue somewhere, where abouts I'm not sure yet. |
|
[07:28] * ogra is heavily disappointed by ram usage of the i810 driver on the classmate ... |
|
[07:28] <slangasek> so there's some triaging to be done, but more importantly there's plenty of bugfixing we should be doing too :) |
|
[07:28] <TheMuso> cjwatson: Sounds sane to me, since NTFs allows for much larger files, and we can now write to it anyways. |
|
[07:29] <ogra> i tried the intel driver by accident, it takes over 30M less reserved ram :( |
|
[07:29] <slangasek> (.oO wubi to umsdos...) |
|
[07:29] <TheMuso> slangasek: Yes, installing onto FAT32 bails out on first attempted boot from the loop mounted FS. |
|
[07:30] <slangasek> TheMuso: oh, sorry, I thought I was making a umsdos joke |
|
[07:30] <cjwatson> that is rather a lot of bugs |
|
[07:30] <calc> ugh no umsdos die die die |
|
[07:30] <evand> ZipSlack will make a comeback someday ;) |
|
[07:31] <ogra> yay |
|
[07:31] <calc> umsdos on fat16... really good way to eat up all clusters |
|
[07:31] <cjwatson> bug 193842 looks complex, and better sooner than later if it's going to land |
|
[07:31] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 193842 in acpi-support "Please sponsor cherrypicked fixes for acpi-support into Hardy" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/193842 |
|
[07:33] <ogra> are we sure these scripts are executed at all with the new power management structure ? |
|
[07:33] * ogra knows modules he lists in /etc/default/acpi-support are definately not unloaded anymore |
|
[07:33] <slangasek> well, I know things aren't firing that I'm expecting to on my Thinkpad |
|
[07:34] <slangasek> but I'm not sure whether that's a kernel issue |
|
[07:34] <ogra> all i know is that with hardy the PM structure changed a lot leaving everything to hal, having mjg59 taking a look at that bug would be a good thing imho |
|
[07:34] <calc> btw are systems supposed to make noise now on sleep/wake? |
|
[07:34] <cjwatson> it wouldn't hurt, but since he's formally left the project we cannot rely on him to do it |
|
[07:34] <calc> i noticed my laptop started doing that a while back |
|
[07:35] <doko_> had a lot of problems with the lcd brightness not coming up again after sleeping |
|
[07:35] <doko_> but current kernel works |
|
[07:35] <ogra> calc, it does that on lid open/close as well ... gpm doesnt have a fine grained scheme for it and just makes noise for everything or nothing |
|
[07:35] <calc> ogra: ah |
|
[07:35] <slangasek> calc: there's a g-p-m change, if you look under preferences there's "Use sound to notify in event of an error"... it seems to believe that everything is an error |
|
[07:35] <dholbach> acpi-support has ~18 bugs with patches attached: http://daniel.holba.ch/really-fix-it |
|
[07:36] <ogra> i had disabled it in the past because i didnf fid it suitable without being able to tag events for noise specifically |
|
[07:36] <cjwatson> ok, we could probably keep on looking at ACPI bugs all day, but I gathered there were a few other agenda items |
|
[07:36] <calc> slangasek: yea it always claims my system doesn't suspend properly but it seems to afaict |
|
[07:36] <slangasek> who else do we have that's versed in the current power management structure then? |
|
[07:36] <slangasek> pitti? |
|
[07:36] <ogra> slangasek, ted does the frontend and matthew the acpi and parts of the kernel stuff |
|
[07:36] <cjwatson> pitti is usually a good start for matters of hardware-from-userspace |
|
[07:37] <bryce> it suddenly got awfully quiet - is this thing still on? *pff pff* |
|
[07:37] <ogra> for hardcore kernel things amit is also a good resource |
|
[07:37] <cjwatson> and as ogra says Ted has been taking on gnome-power-manager maintenance |
|
[07:37] <cjwatson> bryce: there's been pretty steady conversation for the last 30+ minutes |
|
[07:38] <bryce> weird, irc was being hangy. seems better now |
|
[07:38] <dholbach> g-p-m has 14 bugs open on http:/daniel.holba.ch/really-fix-it - if we can't review them, maybe we should forward them upstream and see what hughsie says |
|
[07:39] <cjwatson> could somebody volunteer to review and sponsor that acpi-support change, please? |
|
[07:39] <cjwatson> I suspect that, if it's any good, Daniel Hahler may end up as the de facto acpi-support maintainer ;-) |
|
[07:39] <slangasek> I've already followed up to an acpi-support sponsor request, because some of the proposed changes affect my hardware |
|
[07:39] <slangasek> I can follow through |
|
[07:40] <cjwatson> much appreciated |
|
[07:41] <cjwatson> ArneGoetje: you said you had some other agenda items? |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> * There is a crash report for scim-bridge which has lots of duplicates |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> by now. However, I cannot reliably reproduce it. People claim |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> scim-bridge crashes on startup. However, on a recent Live CD and also on |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> my local system, there is no crash. |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> When installing the Live CD from 3 days ago, after reboot, I activated |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> scim support in Language-Selector and did a reboot. After then I opened |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> a terminal and toggeled scim repeatedly by pressing crtl+space multiple |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> times. The crash happened once and never again. Also inputting complex |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> scripts with scim worked. So, as I cannot reliably reproduce this crash, |
|
[07:41] <ArneGoetje> I'm asking for help. |
|
[07:42] <slangasek> no apport retracer data on it |
|
[07:42] <slangasek> ? |
|
[07:42] <ArneGoetje> slangasek: the bug has apport data attached. |
|
[07:42] <slangasek> bug #? |
|
[07:43] <ArneGoetje> bug #199592 |
|
[07:44] * slangasek whimpers |
|
[07:44] <slangasek> that looks like conflicting libstdc++ versions to me |
|
[07:45] <ArneGoetje> So, basically my question is, why it happens only in some situations, and whether it really is a scim-bridge bug or libscim, which is in the scim package, or somewhere else... |
|
[07:45] <ArneGoetje> I noticed there were some linstdc++ updates in the past days... |
|
[07:46] <slangasek> I'm thinking of the class of crash that's caused by having two different libstdc++ sonames loaded in memory at the same time |
|
[07:46] * ArneGoetje has no idea about that |
|
[07:46] <slangasek> it classically affects XIM because XIM is one of the few things that's dynamically loaded by a large range of apps, *and* is written in C++ |
|
[07:46] <cjwatson> this is the actual scim-bridge process though, not a random client |
|
[07:47] <doko_> but even the fglrx driver now uses libstdc++.so.6 |
|
[07:47] <slangasek> right; I don't know for sure that's the same problem here, but it's the first thing I think of when I see unreproducible crashes in a C++ deconstructor |
|
[07:47] <cjwatson> could of course be a poorly-written destructor |
|
[07:47] <slangasek> true |
|
[07:48] <doko_> hmm, when was scim-bridge built the last time? |
|
[07:48] <slangasek> 6 days ago |
|
[07:48] <doko_> ok |
|
[07:49] <cjwatson> scim::Module::unload is not exactly trivial ... |
|
[07:49] <cjwatson> calls a bunch of other stuff, does dlclose, etc. |
|
[07:50] <cjwatson> but the crash doesn't always seem to be there, either |
|
[07:50] <cjwatson> it might be worth running scim-bridge under valgrind |
|
[07:51] <cjwatson> doko_: could you help Arne out with this? |
|
[07:51] <doko_> cjwatson: trying, but probably not before Tuesday |
|
[07:52] <cjwatson> ok, if the other problems with scim being started by default get fixed, then it will only affect CJK users (for whom presumably it isn't a regression) |
|
[07:52] <ArneGoetje> for CJK users it's expected behaviour |
|
[07:53] <cjwatson> a crash is not expected behaviour |
|
[07:53] <cjwatson> without loss of generality |
|
[07:53] <ArneGoetje> I mean scim being started by default :P |
|
[07:53] <cjwatson> right, but I didn't :-) |
|
[07:53] <ArneGoetje> got it |
|
[07:53] <cjwatson> I meant that the crash has presumably been around for a while |
|
[07:54] <cjwatson> I'll un-private that bug and stick it on the hardy list |
|
[07:54] <ArneGoetje> thanks |
|
[07:54] <cjwatson> any other business? |
|
[07:54] <asac> two quick questions: |
|
[07:54] <TheMuso> Yes, a quick one re minutes. |
|
[07:54] <TheMuso> asac: go |
|
[07:54] <asac> NetworkManager: does anyone experience issues since 0.6.6? i am especially interested in ipw2X00, madwifi and broadcom things. |
|
[07:55] <cjwatson> broadcom seems OK for me so far |
|
[07:55] <doko_> cjwatson: some things ... |
|
[07:55] * ogra is very happy with it on his laptop and on the classmate |
|
[07:55] * TheMuso hasn't used his ipw2100 for a fair while, but will try with the latest daily. |
|
[07:55] <ogra> (laptop == broadcom as well) |
|
[07:55] <asac> TheMuso: please do |
|
[07:55] <asac> i dropped a bunch of driver tweaks |
|
[07:55] <doko_> do we want to have bash-completion installed on the desktop? |
|
[07:55] <asac> and its hard to judge from bugs if that is just after-upgrade-"noise" |
|
[07:55] <asac> 2nd. did anyone retrieve my activity report last week? |
|
[07:55] * ArneGoetje has ipw2200... will try tonight... (no wireless here right now) |
|
[07:56] <doko_> some users think so, but others disagree. if it's installed, it is enabled by default |
|
[07:56] <ogra> doko_, is it big ? does it do any harm sitting on the disk ? |
|
[07:56] <cjwatson> 3010 Mar 05 Alexander Sack ( 74) [ACTIVITY] Feb 27 - Mar 04 (asac) |
|
[07:56] <cjwatson> 3069 L Mar 12 Alexander Sack ( 59) [ACTIVITY] Mar 05 - Mar 11 |
|
[07:56] <doko_> no harm on the list |
|
[07:56] <asac> ArneGoetje: highly appreciated. i have reports about it being broken |
|
[07:56] <Hobbsee> asac: wfm, ipw3945 (know it's not exactly your target group) |
|
[07:56] <slangasek> wasn't it installed by default before (as part of bash)? |
|
[07:56] <ArneGoetje> asac: orz |
|
[07:56] <doko_> 120k |
|
[07:56] <cjwatson> doko_: I never wanted it enabled by default in the first place, but considered that I'd lost that battle |
|
[07:56] * TheMuso wondered where his useful completion went. |
|
[07:56] <TheMuso> s/his/the/ |
|
[07:56] <asac> cjwatson: ok thanks. i still didn't get that. just want to be sure because it contained some valuable content about mozilla translations imo |
|
[07:57] <TheMuso> I can live with not having it by default. |
|
[07:57] <ogra> doko_, pfft |
|
[07:57] <doko_> slangasek: yes, but I got tired, never getting any replies from upstream |
|
[07:57] <ogra> thats nothing |
|
[07:57] <asac> ok if you could try all the chipsets you have around i would be happy to receive feedback |
|
[07:57] <ogra> imho we should have it ... its comfortable |
|
[07:57] <TheMuso> asac: Will keep you posted. |
|
[07:57] <asac> TheMuso: go |
|
[07:57] <cjwatson> the only thing that ever concerned me about bash-completion was shell startup time |
|
[07:57] <doko_> in the case we still want it, I'd like to seed it for desktop, so that people can uninstall it on the server |
|
[07:58] <calc> asac: not sure if this is expected but it seems nm still drops connection on upgrades |
|
[07:58] <cjwatson> mainly affecting people like us who start lots of shells |
|
[07:58] <TheMuso> Ok. re minutes, this is the 4th week I've done it. While I don't mind doing them, I wonder if people would be up for doing 4 weekly stints of minutes, and then moving onto someone else? |
|
[07:58] <asac> calc: thats expected. i will fix that for final (e.g. don't restart at all) |
|
[07:58] <calc> asac: ok |
|
[07:58] <doko_> ok, but the lots of you can then remove or disable it |
|
[07:58] <ogra> cjwatson, well, give that the terminal we use already grabs 20-25M and is slow anyway, who cares ... |
|
[07:58] <ogra> *given |
|
[07:58] <asac> not restarting is the official advice from upstream :( |
|
[07:58] <cjwatson> ogra: might be the terminal *you* use :-P |
|
[07:59] <ogra> cjwatson, i use the one *we* install by default :) |
|
[07:59] <doko_> any disagreement to seed bash-completion again? |
|
[07:59] <ogra> the one our users use :) |
|
[07:59] <cjwatson> doko_: remove/disable> indeed, I do, but still |
|
[07:59] <cjwatson> doko_: bash-completion is a Recommends at present, so it looks like it can be removed already |
|
[07:59] <doko_> we can keep it in universe as well |
|
[08:00] <cjwatson> in fact, I appear not to have it installed, presumably by accident |
|
[08:00] <cjwatson> ogra: (yeah, this is my one deviation from that rule which I normally do apply to myself) |
|
[08:00] <doko_> next thing: shorewall - do we want to have this in main? |
|
[08:01] <cjwatson> I have no objection to bash-completion either being seeded or unseeded; if it is seeded, it should be as a recommends (" * (bash-completion)") |
|
[08:01] <ogra> i use xterm on the classmate i must admit :) |
|
[08:01] <cjwatson> hang on, let's serialise these agenda items |
|
[08:01] <ogra> doko_, i thought that was gone after th discussion a month ago |
|
[08:01] <cjwatson> 07:58 <TheMuso> Ok. re minutes, this is the 4th week I've done it. While I don't mind doing them, I wonder if people would be up for doing 4 weekly stints of minutes, and then moving onto someone else? |
|
[08:02] <cjwatson> I have no objection to rotating the secretary job if there are other volunteers |
|
[08:03] <cjwatson> TheMuso: BTW, as a small tweak, it would be good to have an explicit Actions section at the end with any specific follow-on tasks that have been agreed; I find that useful when it comes to the next meeting |
|
[08:03] <TheMuso> cjwatson: Ok thanks for feedback. |
|
[08:03] <cjwatson> would anyone else like to do this after Luke, with the knowledge that it's for a bounded time? |
|
[08:04] <TheMuso> Ok, I'm quite happy to keep doing them for the time being. |
|
[08:04] <doko_> I volunteer, but not for the next two weeks |
|
[08:05] <bryce> I can take May |
|
[08:05] <cjwatson> thanks, I'm sure even a rotation of three will help; sort it out among yourselves :-) |
|
[08:05] <cjwatson> doko_: so, shorewall |
|
[08:05] <cjwatson> as contrasted with ufw, presumably |
|
[08:06] <doko_> ok, I'll re-add it to the seeds, with a comment |
|
[08:06] <cjwatson> ... (I didn't think that was a decision) |
|
[08:06] <doko_> oops |
|
[08:06] <cjwatson> shorewall was in main up to gutsy, so I certainly have no objection to it being added back |
|
[08:07] <doko_> once the bashims were fixed it looks rather stable |
|
[08:07] <cjwatson> you removed it, I see |
|
[08:07] <cjwatson> - remove shorewall from server-ship (ufw is in main) |
|
[08:07] <slangasek> it's not the killer firewall, but ufw isn't today either; and shorewall gives users functionality that ufw doesn't |
|
[08:07] <doko_> yes, but it's still referenced in Kubuntu hardy |
|
[08:07] <cjwatson> my gut feeling is that ufw is rather new and relatively untried compared to shorewall, and, while ufw may well turn out to be the future once it's well-integrated, a lot of people will still want to use shorewall for good reasons |
|
[08:08] <cjwatson> so I think we should ship it |
|
[08:08] * ArneGoetje is happily using shorewall on all my machines, including laptop :) |
|
[08:08] <cjwatson> technically it should be a server team decision, mind you |
|
[08:09] <doko_> I'll bring it to their attention |
|
[08:10] <doko_> next: any actions about duplicates/unnecessary files on the CDs? |
|
[08:10] <cjwatson> but I think it's fine to go for status quo (i.e. ship shorewall, as in gutsy) until they explicitly say otherwise |
|
[08:10] <cjwatson> which would correspond to "use ufw in all cases, damn your eyes" |
|
[08:11] <cjwatson> can we carry on discussing duplicates/unnecessary files on the list? |
|
[08:11] <cjwatson> or perhaps on ubuntu-devel@, since it's currently distro-team@ |
|
[08:11] <cjwatson> just conscious that we're over time |
|
[08:11] <doko_> fine with me, sending then to u-d |
|
[08:11] <asac> i have another quick one about seeds: the crash reporter of mozilla upstream builds doesn't work in default installs, because we don't ship ca-certificates. any arguments against shipping them? |
|
[08:11] <asac> (or make curl depend on ca-certificates) |
|
[08:12] <cjwatson> I'm sure we used to ship ca-certificates? |
|
[08:12] <ogra> didnt we ship the before ? |
|
[08:12] <asac> i think so ... i guess one rdepends got removed from cd |
|
[08:12] <cjwatson> no objection to shipping them provided that its (crazy) debconf question doesn't get asked by default |
|
[08:12] <cjwatson> unfortunately I suspect it does get asked by default on upgrades, worth checking its priority |
|
[08:12] <asac> yes. afaik you don't get asked about that |
|
[08:13] <asac> hmm ... really? i never saw any question. but maybe thats because the packages wasn't updated for a while |
|
[08:13] <asac> i can check that |
|
[08:13] <asac> thanks |
|
[08:13] <cjwatson> I'm just going on vague memory, I'm afraid |
|
[08:13] <cjwatson> ca-certificates was in dapper/desktop |
|
[08:14] <cjwatson> dependency of libcurl3 |
|
[08:14] <cjwatson> apparently it fell out in gutsy |
|
[08:14] <asac> hmmm ... libcurl3-gnutls has a recommends on it now |
|
[08:15] <cjwatson> might have to duplicate that recommendation in the seeds, then, until such time as we do recommends-by-default |
|
[08:15] <asac> yep |
|
[08:15] <asac> thanks |
|
[08:15] <cjwatson> which I think fell out of hardy because the ball was in too many people's courts |
|
[08:15] <cjwatson> ok, 15 minutes over time, so let's adjourn |
|
[08:15] <cjwatson> thanks all |
|
[08:15] <TheMuso> Thanks. |
|
[08:15] <asac> thanks all |
|
[08:15] <slangasek> thanks |
|
[08:15] <ogra> thanks |
|
[08:15] <TheMuso> Minutes will be out tomorrow. |
|
[08:16] * asac hugs TheMuso |
|
[08:16] <bryce> thanks |
|
[08:16] <cjwatson> great |
|
[08:16] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 199592 in scim-bridge "scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::Module::unload()" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199592 |
|
[08:16] <ArneGoetje> thanks |
|
[08:18] <evand> thanks |
|
[08:18] <calc> goodnight :) |
|
[08:19] <cjwatson> sleep well, USians |
|
[08:19] * bryce zzz's |
|
[08:19] <bryce> (early meeting tomorrow) |
|
[08:21] <evand> heh, thanks |
|
=== doko_ is now known as doko |
|
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh |
|
=== ogra_cmpc_ is now known as ogra_cmpc |
|
[12:04] <RichEd> hello ... who's here for the education meeting ? |
|
[12:04] * stgraber waves |
|
[12:04] <RichEd> hi stgraber :) |
|
[12:05] * ogra_cmpc waves ... very tired |
|
[12:06] <ogra_cmpc> only us three ? |
|
[12:06] <RichEd> well apart from the passive lurkers ... looks like it |
|
[12:07] <RichEd> let's whip through a tech status then ... |
|
[12:07] <ogra_cmpc> well, i somewhat lost track with edubuntu the last days, was sitting in a cave and finishing the autobuilder and writing the new installer |
|
[12:07] * Hobbsee waves |
|
[12:08] <ogra_cmpc> on my for fixes i have the edubuntu-addon metatdata ... there is still the xfce entry in there which doesnt do anything anymore |
|
[12:09] <ogra_cmpc> and te edubuntu entry needs a proper short descritipon ... |
|
[12:09] <RichEd> ahhh .. |
|
[12:09] * RichEd spots the delayed wave from Hobbsee all the way from oz |
|
[12:10] <Hobbsee> RichEd: :) |
|
[12:10] <ogra_cmpc> there is still some gfxboot work i didnt manage yet (adding LTSP to the modes menu and somehow find a way to prevent teh addon cd from looking like a install cd if you boot it) ... i was pondering to ask cjwatson for help here |
|
[12:10] <ogra_cmpc> gfxboot is a beast and takes more time than i want to understand it atm |
|
[12:11] <ogra_cmpc> s/want/have/ |
|
[12:11] <ogra_cmpc> beyond that the cds should be pretty much in shape |
|
[12:11] <ogra_cmpc> s/cds/cd/ |
|
[12:11] <ogra_cmpc> :D |
|
[12:12] <ogra_cmpc> you will have seen me throwing around classmate images ... so classmate is also starting to look pretty well ... better and better every day |
|
[12:14] <ogra_cmpc> for ltsp i plan a final upload for tonight or tommorw, there are a bunch of bugs with fixes i want to include before we freeze to deep .... |
|
[12:14] <ogra_cmpc> well, thats about it from the tech side |
|
[12:14] <ogra_cmpc> i'd like to note that artwork freeze is tomorrow |
|
[12:14] <RichEd> gimme a sec ... getting power |
|
[12:14] <ogra_cmpc> which means we'll likely not have anything new in hardy |
|
[12:15] <ogra_cmpc> and there are a bunch of edubuntu-doc bugs that need a helping hand (not sure if laserjock went over them already) |
|
[12:15] <RichEd> is that an absolute art final, or is there a sneak it in route i've heard mentioned :) |
|
[12:16] <ogra_cmpc> the artwork thing is quite bad btw .... |
|
[12:16] <ogra_cmpc> no official one |
|
[12:16] <ogra_cmpc> we have an LTS this time |
|
[12:16] <RichEd> okay ... and what time tomorrow is the freeze ? |
|
[12:16] <ogra_cmpc> and that means the doc teams will want to have a fixed UI state for their screenshots etc |
|
[12:16] <ogra_cmpc> there is no time |
|
[12:17] <RichEd> so is the end of the day US time acceptable ? |
|
[12:17] <ogra_cmpc> slangasek is our release manager ... he will call out the freeze at will |
|
[12:17] <RichEd> i'll hav a word with him ... see how flexible he could be ... |
|
[12:17] <ogra_cmpc> not sure what time he prefers, but he sits in US westcoast ... |
|
[12:18] <ogra_cmpc> so rather late tomorrow i guess |
|
[12:18] <ogra_cmpc> (i also think he"s more concerned about teh beta freeze than about artwork :) they are the same date this time) |
|
[12:19] <RichEd> great ... even if we polish one of the alternates from the last round ... a different desktop for LTS would be good |
|
[12:19] <ogra_cmpc> well, i dont see anything i'd like to ship in the alternates |
|
[12:19] * RichEd will drive that, and kep ogra_cmpc informed |
|
[12:19] <ogra_cmpc> else i would have added one already during the dev cycle |
|
[12:19] <ogra_cmpc> thanks :) |
|
[12:19] <RichEd> let me touch sides with ideas tomorrow |
|
[12:20] <RichEd> a couple of classmate questions for you, but i'll grab you later for that ... they are intel device specific |
|
[12:20] <ogra_cmpc> ok |
|
[12:20] <RichEd> stgraber: can you give me an update on iTalc ... with comments from ogra_cmpc about the odds of inclusion ? |
|
[12:21] <ogra_cmpc> its in sinc4e we4eks |
|
[12:21] <ogra_cmpc> oops |
|
[12:21] <ogra_cmpc> its in since weeks |
|
[12:21] <RichEd> 4sure |
|
[12:21] <RichEd> :) |
|
[12:21] <RichEd> excellemt |
|
[12:21] <ogra_cmpc> i reported that three weeks ago or so in the meeting :) |
|
[12:21] <stgraber> ogra_cmpc: is it on the add-on CD ? |
|
[12:21] <ogra_cmpc> the client is even installed in the default classmate install now |
|
[12:21] <RichEd> my head has been bent a bit of late ... may need reminders at times :) |
|
[12:21] <RichEd> w00t re classmate :) |
|
[12:22] <ogra_cmpc> stgraber, just in main yet, i havent done the last seed shuffle dance yet |
|
[12:22] * RichEd hands an ubuntu noddy badge to stgraber and ogra |
|
[12:22] <stgraber> btw, I pinged upstream a bit earlier and he'll see what he can do to give us a patch for the MMX and bug fixes |
|
[12:23] <ogra_cmpc> do we have a bug with the patch already ? or only the mail you sent me ? |
|
[12:23] <RichEd> stgraber: is upstream positive about our use of it and inclusion ? |
|
[12:24] <stgraber> yes and he's helped me quite a lot for it |
|
[12:24] <stgraber> ogra_cmpc: only the mail |
|
[12:24] <RichEd> great ... cc me in the next mail to him, and i will extend our thanks |
|
[12:24] <RichEd> please :) |
|
[12:24] <ogra_cmpc> ok, we need a bug for pitti/slangasek then |
|
[12:25] <stgraber> RichEd: sure |
|
[12:25] <stgraber> ogra_cmpc: ok, I'll open one with the same info has I emailed you |
|
[12:26] <ogra_cmpc> thanks a lot |
|
[12:26] <RichEd> okay stgraber / ogra_cmpc / Hobbsee ... any other urgent issues ? |
|
[12:27] * RichEd does not have anything else to raise today ... need to get work done for meetings and freeze tomorrow |
|
[12:27] <ogra_cmpc> same here |
|
[12:27] <Hobbsee> RichEd: if you've got edubuntu-specific stuff to freeze, which doesn't affect the rest, you should be OK |
|
[12:27] <stgraber> nothing from me |
|
[12:27] <ogra_cmpc> and i had a 8am meeting already |
|
[12:27] <RichEd> ogra_cmpc: can i grab you at the top of the hour for 15 / 20 mins ? |
|
[12:27] <ogra_cmpc> (after 3h of sleep ...) |
|
[12:27] <ogra_cmpc> sure |
|
[12:28] <RichEd> anti-theft and other fiddly bits ... need an update |
|
[12:28] <ogra_cmpc> lets see how much i can squeeze out of my brain still :) |
|
[12:28] * ogra_cmpc is curious about the fiddly bits |
|
[12:28] <RichEd> ogra_cmpc: if we add our two brains together, we may have at least half a decent one to chat with some sense |
|
[12:29] <ogra_cmpc> heh |
|
[12:29] <RichEd> the proprietary drive issues ... them fiddly bits |
|
[12:29] <RichEd> *driver |
|
[12:29] <ogra_cmpc> there are proprietary drivers ? |
|
[12:29] <RichEd> sonic etc. |
|
[12:29] * ogra_cmpc wasnt aware and didnt plan anything ... |
|
[12:30] <RichEd> me repeats the call for issues ... and raises the gavel in anticipation |
|
[12:30] * RichEd looks around |
|
[12:30] * RichEd counts to 10 |
|
[12:30] <RichEd> going once ... |
|
[12:30] <RichEd> twice ... |
|
[12:31] <RichEd> and that's a BONG and thanks ... |
|
[12:31] <ogra_cmpc> thanks |
|
[12:31] <RichEd> will be in the channel if needed |
|
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch |
|
[13:19] <cjwatson> ogra_cmpc_: oh, you want LTSP on Edubuntu's modes menu? |
|
[13:20] <ogra_cmpc_> cjwatson, in alternates modes menu |
|
[13:20] <ogra_cmpc_> there is no edubuntu cd with ltsp anymore :) |
|
[13:20] <cjwatson> err, right |
|
[13:20] <cjwatson> ok, that should be easy |
|
[13:20] <ogra_cmpc_> how freeze critical is that ? |
|
[13:21] <cjwatson> it doesn't require a package upload, but we should still do it sooner rather than later |
|
[13:21] <ogra_cmpc_> i would prefer to do it myself but i'm kneedeep in classmate stuff and wouldnt like to hibernate the enthusiasm |
|
[13:21] <cjwatson> why don't I do it now and mail you the diff so that you can grok it |
|
[13:21] <cjwatson> and then you get to do the next similar change :) |
|
[13:21] <ogra_cmpc_> that would be great |
|
[13:21] <ogra_cmpc_> thanks :) |
|
[13:22] <ogra_cmpc_> another thing i thought about is the edubuntu cd ... cant we just drop the bootloader completely during build ? |
|
[13:22] <cjwatson> we could, true |
|
[13:22] <ogra_cmpc_> so the BIOS cares and we dont need to make up special artwork, translations etc |
|
[13:22] <cjwatson> it would be a bit unhelpful but possibly better than a bootloader that doesn't work |
|
[13:23] <ogra_cmpc_> right |
|
[13:23] <ogra_cmpc_> and making it pretty is a bit more work imho ... |
|
[13:28] <cjwatson> ogra_cmpc_: ok, both done |
|
[13:29] <ogra_cmpc_> thanks, that takes some pressure away |
|
=== mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell |
|
[13:40] <nand> #ubuntu-testing |
|
[13:40] <nand> :} |
|
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn |
|
=== ogra_cmpc__ is now known as ogra_cmpc |
|
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach |
|
=== mvo__ is now known as mvo |
|
[16:00] <pedro_> hello hello |
|
[16:00] * Iulian waves |
|
[16:00] <ogasawara> hi |
|
[16:00] <pedro_> hey Iulian, hello ogasawara |
|
[16:00] <liw_> heippa |
|
[16:00] <pedro_> hola liw_ |
|
[16:01] <nand> bonjour! |
|
[16:01] <bdmurray> howdy |
|
[16:01] <pedro_> salut |
|
[16:01] <heno> hello! |
|
[16:02] <Iulian> Hiya |
|
[16:02] * stgraber waves |
|
=== soren is now known as soren_not_joking |
|
[16:02] <heno> My system just died a minute ago, had to reboot :( |
|
=== soren_not_joking is now known as soren_joking |
|
[16:03] <heno> I'll need to investigate that after the meeting |
|
=== soren_joking is now known as soren |
|
[16:03] <heno> bdmurray, ogasawara: here? |
|
[16:03] <bdmurray> ype |
|
[16:03] <ogasawara> heno: yup |
|
[16:03] <heno> ok |
|
[16:04] <heno> #startmeeting |
|
[16:04] <MootBot> Meeting started at 16:04. The chair is heno. |
|
[16:04] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] |
|
[16:04] <heno> not many agenda items today: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Meetings |
|
[16:05] <heno> [TOPIC] Beta testing preparations |
|
[16:05] <MootBot> New Topic: Beta testing preparations |
|
[16:05] <heno> davmor2 and I met on Saturday to talk about Beta+ testing |
|
[16:06] <heno> I've drawn up a proposed schedule here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Schedule |
|
[16:07] <heno> according to which testing starts tomorrow |
|
[16:08] <heno> I'll write the distro team about contributing and blog as well |
|
[16:08] <heno> I'll be asking for help mostly toward the end -- ISO validation testing - March 18-19 |
|
[16:09] <heno> ok, next |
|
[16:09] <heno> [TOPIC] Testing wiki pages refreshed - please review |
|
[16:09] <MootBot> New Topic: Testing wiki pages refreshed - please review |
|
[16:10] <heno> that's mostly done. We still need to update some test cases |
|
[16:10] <heno> I'll post to the QA list regarding new features that we should cover |
|
[16:11] <bdmurray> I've been looking at the pages a bit this morning |
|
[16:11] <liw_> the update is done, or the review is done? |
|
[16:11] <heno> update |
|
[16:11] <liw_> so it's still good to review, check |
|
[16:12] <heno> I've been looking at http://www.ubuntu.com/testing for ideas for new test cases. |
|
[16:12] <heno> But further suggestions are welcome |
|
[16:12] <bdmurray> Does the FixValidation page overlap a lot with FixesToVerify? |
|
[16:13] <heno> bdmurray: not really |
|
[16:13] <heno> FixValidation is supposed to be bugs fixed since the milestone freeze |
|
[16:14] <heno> so in the past 2-3 days at that point |
|
[16:14] <bdmurray> okay |
|
[16:14] <heno> making sure that code we _just_ touched didn't break anything |
|
[16:15] <heno> both are useful to test from in that period though |
|
[16:15] <heno> bdmurray: thanks, I should clarify that on the page |
|
[16:16] <heno> so, please look the pages over for sanity and readability |
|
[16:16] <heno> that should cover that topic |
|
[16:17] <heno> bdmurray: how has your yesterday page been working? |
|
[16:17] <bdmurray> It has been interesting to me at least. |
|
[16:17] <heno> also an interesting page is http://daniel.holba.ch/really-fix-it/ |
|
[16:17] <ogasawara> I was going through the really-fix-it kernel bugs yesterday |
|
[16:18] <heno> bdmurray: perhaps you can get the progress meter from there |
|
[16:18] <bdmurray> heno: that's an interesting idea |
|
[16:18] <heno> I looked at the abiword bugs and it seems they will all stay on the list |
|
[16:19] <heno> they are fixed upstream in v. 2.6 which I don't think we'll get until intrepid |
|
[16:20] <pedro_> right, bumping to 2.6 wouldn't be nice at this stage... |
|
[16:20] <heno> There should perhaps be a way of marking such bugs as 'have-looked-at-not-for-hardy' <- dholbach |
|
[16:23] <heno> any other topics today? |
|
[16:23] <bdmurray> heno: Have you been looking at Hardy nominations at all? |
|
[16:23] <heno> bdmurray: no I haven't |
|
[16:24] <bdmurray> Maybe we should review those again. |
|
[16:24] <heno> bdmurray: do you have the URL handy? |
|
[16:24] <dholbach> heno: not very easy to do |
|
[16:25] <heno> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+nominations |
|
[16:25] <bdmurray> heno: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+nominations |
|
[16:25] <bdmurray> ;) |
|
[16:26] <heno> dholbach: with a tag perhaps and mark it on the list with an * ? |
|
[16:26] <dholbach> or milestone it as 'later'? |
|
[16:26] <heno> that'll work |
|
[16:26] <dholbach> ok, I'll document that on the page and filter them out |
|
[16:27] <heno> so the nomination list is long again :) |
|
[16:27] <bdmurray> Couldn't we get an Ibex milestone setup rather than using Later? |
|
[16:27] <heno> dholbach: cool! |
|
[16:27] <bdmurray> Because they would just need to move from later to Ibex |
|
[16:27] <liw_> Ibex? |
|
[16:28] <bdmurray> liw_: Intrepid? |
|
[16:28] <stgraber> intrepid |
|
[16:28] <liw_> ah, right |
|
[16:28] <heno> so how do we triage the nominated bugs at this stage? Milestone the serious looking ones? |
|
[16:28] <bdmurray> and the In Progress ones. ;) |
|
[16:29] <heno> that would bring it onto the lists the developers and release managers look at |
|
[16:29] <heno> my guess is there is already a fair bit of overlap |
|
[16:30] <heno> ok, let's all have a look at the list and reduce it a bit for the next meeting |
|
[16:30] <heno> then we'll have a better idea of what it contains |
|
[16:31] <heno> bdmurray: thanks for bringing that up |
|
[16:31] <bdmurray> Sounds good. Who should we speak to about adding an Intrepid milestone? |
|
[16:32] <heno> bdmurray: any LP admin I think, so kiko or mdz for example |
|
[16:32] <heno> bdmurray: will you take that? |
|
[16:32] <heno> I'll make a start on nominations today |
|
[16:32] <bdmurray> heno: okay, I'm pretty sure we have the power I'm not certain on the procedure |
|
[16:33] <bdmurray> anyway I'll look into it |
|
[16:33] <heno> likely not documented on the LP wiki |
|
[16:33] <heno> thanks |
|
[16:33] <heno> anything else? |
|
[16:35] <heno> ok, thanks everyone! |
|
[16:35] <heno> #endmeeting |
|
[16:35] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 16:35. |
|
[16:36] * heno goes digging in logs to find out why his computer crashed earlier |
|
=== leonel_ is now known as leonel |
|
[16:36] <liw_> heno, just in case it's memory, you may want to run memtest86+ from the grub menu, for at least 12 hours, preferably 24 |
|
[16:37] <heno> liw_: that is a good candidate, yes |
|
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away |
|
=== juliux_ is now known as juliux |
|
=== cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson |
|
[19:00] <keescook> @now utc |
|
[19:00] <ubotu> Current time in Etc/UTC: March 12 2008, 19:00:22 - Next meeting: Server Team in 1 hour 59 minutes |
|
[19:00] <keescook> #startmeeting |
|
[19:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 19:00. The chair is keescook. |
|
[19:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] |
|
[19:00] <keescook> [topic] introductions |
|
[19:00] <MootBot> New Topic: introductions |
|
[19:00] * propagandist waves |
|
[19:00] <keescook> okay, are people here for the security team meeting? :) hi propagandist |
|
[19:01] <keescook> [link] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting |
|
[19:01] <MootBot> LINK received: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Meeting |
|
[19:01] <keescook> there is the agenda for today's meeting |
|
[19:01] <emgent> @schedule rome |
|
[19:01] <ubotu> Schedule for Europe/Rome: 12 Mar 22:00: Server Team | 14 Mar 21:00: MOTU | 14 Mar 22:00: REVU Coordination | 19 Mar 22:00: Server Team | 26 Mar 22:00: Server Team |
|
[19:01] <emgent> hi keescook |
|
[19:02] <keescook> heya emgent |
|
[19:02] <keescook> looks like joejaxx isn't here, but I'd like to still cover the TODO list/Roadmap |
|
[19:02] <emgent> jdstrand, :) |
|
[19:02] <keescook> is anyone from motu-swat here to do membership stuff for that team? |
|
[19:03] * jdstrand got confused with the recent change to EDT |
|
[19:03] <keescook> well, and I tried to trick every one by moving it an hour in UTC too. :P |
|
[19:04] <jdstrand> very sneaky indeed |
|
[19:05] <keescook> Fujitsu: are you here? (ScottK, Nafallo, and sistypot aren't -- the other motu-swat admins) |
|
[19:05] <keescook> okay, well, I'll mark the motu-swat agenda item as postponed for now. |
|
[19:06] <keescook> alright, moving forward... |
|
[19:06] <keescook> [topic] CVE review |
|
[19:06] <MootBot> New Topic: CVE review |
|
[19:06] <keescook> the only item I have here is to call attention to the -proposed version of mysql that jdstrand prepared. |
|
[19:07] <jdstrand> hey I was going to do that |
|
[19:07] <keescook> have at it. :) |
|
[19:07] <keescook> [link] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-March/025173.html |
|
[19:07] <MootBot> LINK received: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-March/025173.html |
|
[19:07] <jdstrand> the bug is #201009 |
|
[19:07] <jdstrand> bug #201009 |
|
[19:07] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 201009 in mysql-dfsg-5.0 "[mysql-dfsg-5.0] fix for several open vulnerabilities in -proposed" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201009 |
|
[19:08] <jdstrand> we need testing of the -proposed packages with feedback put in that bug |
|
[19:08] <keescook> anyone running mysql that can give it a go? |
|
[19:08] <jdstrand> the summary is that there were several CVEs that are fixed, but two of them, CVE-2007-6303 and CVE-2007-2692 were fairly intrusive |
|
[19:08] <ubotu> MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.51a, 5.1.x before 5.1.23, and 6.0.x before 6.0.4 does not update the DEFINER value of a view when the view is altered, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via a sequence of statements including a CREATE SQL SECURITY DEFINER VIEW statement and an ALTER VIEW statement. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-6303) |
|
[19:08] <ubotu> The mysql_change_db function in MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.40 and 5.1.x before 5.1.18 does not restore THD::db_access privileges when returning from SQL SECURITY INVOKER stored routines, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-2692) |
|
[19:09] <jdstrand> you go ubotu |
|
[19:09] <jdstrand> anyhoo, the packages have gone through quite a bit of testing already and are in good shape as far as I can tell, but it be nice to get more testing |
|
[19:10] <jdstrand> dapper - feisty primarily |
|
[19:10] <sdh> oops, hi |
|
[19:10] <jdstrand> gutsy is close enough to upstream that it wasn't affected be these |
|
[19:10] <jdstrand> that came out weird |
|
[19:11] <jdstrand> gutsy isn't affected by those |
|
[19:11] <jdstrand> heh |
|
[19:11] <jdstrand> ok, that was wrong |
|
[19:11] <keescook> heh :) |
|
[19:12] <jdstrand> gutsy is affected by 6303, but is close enough to the current upstream that its patch wasn't intrusive |
|
[19:12] * jdstrand tried to be too brief in his summary |
|
[19:12] <keescook> cool. so, anyone listening, please enable -proposed and give some feedback. :) |
|
[19:12] <keescook> any other CVE issues people want to bring up? |
|
[19:13] <keescook> [topic] Contributing to ubuntu-cve-tracker |
|
[19:13] <MootBot> New Topic: Contributing to ubuntu-cve-tracker |
|
[19:14] <keescook> okay, so, the Ubuntu CVE tracker is used to ... track CVEs |
|
[19:14] <keescook> [link] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-cve-tracker |
|
[19:14] <MootBot> LINK received: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-cve-tracker |
|
[19:15] <keescook> we're all doing lots of CVE updates, and I'd like to have more people from motu-swat reviewing the open CVEs |
|
[19:15] <keescook> Fujitsu did a few great passes at it, but it still needs more work |
|
[19:15] <keescook> the process is fairly well documented in the README |
|
[19:15] <keescook> [link] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/ubuntu-cve-tracker/master/files |
|
[19:15] <MootBot> LINK received: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/ubuntu-cve-tracker/master/files |
|
[19:15] <jdstrand> in addition to getting it up to date, ubuntu-cve-tracker is the main method we use to coordinate wok on the CVEs |
|
[19:16] <keescook> before the next meeting, I'll make sure we have a published "open CVE" list so it's easier for people to see the work |
|
[19:16] <keescook> [action] keescook to get HTML publication finalized |
|
[19:16] <MootBot> ACTION received: keescook to get HTML publication finalized |
|
[19:16] <jdstrand> it is important that if we are preparing updates that we check ubuntu-cve-tracker to see if the CVE is assigned to someone, so there isn't duplicate work |
|
[19:17] <jdstrand> (this happened recently) |
|
[19:17] <keescook> emgent: have you had a chance to check out a branch of this? |
|
[19:17] <jdstrand> if it's assigned to someone, then ping that person to see what's going on |
|
[19:17] <emgent> yep |
|
[19:17] <emgent> i use this for working |
|
[19:18] <keescook> emgent: cool. if you have any changes, please push up a branch and we can merge in your updates |
|
[19:18] <emgent> ok i will do. |
|
[19:18] <jdstrand> seems that is the best way to go |
|
[19:18] <keescook> okay... moving on |
|
[19:18] <keescook> [topic] To-Do List (Expanding our Roadmap) |
|
[19:18] <MootBot> New Topic: To-Do List (Expanding our Roadmap) |
|
=== asac_ is now known as asac |
|
[19:19] <keescook> [link] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Roadmap |
|
[19:19] <MootBot> LINK received: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Roadmap |
|
[19:19] <jdstrand> motu-swat people check out their branch, keep it up to date with master, and keescook and I will pull in the changes |
|
[19:19] <jdstrand> lp has a way to request a merge that makes it very convenient |
|
[19:19] <keescook> I'd like to see more things listed on the ST roadmap :) |
|
[19:19] <jdstrand> Fujitsu did that the other day and it worked great |
|
[19:20] <keescook> if people have ideas about stuff they want to work on, please add it to the roadmap. |
|
[19:20] <jdstrand> yikes, I didn't think we were done with u-c-t yet |
|
[19:20] <keescook> I'd love to get all the non-exec stack bugs closed, too. |
|
[19:20] <keescook> jdstrand: np, it was kind of a short topic -- not a big group today |
|
[19:21] <keescook> [action] keescook to add non-exec stack bug list to roadmap |
|
[19:21] <MootBot> ACTION received: keescook to add non-exec stack bug list to roadmap |
|
[19:21] <emgent> :) |
|
[19:21] <keescook> anyone have anything else they want to see on the TODO list? |
|
[19:22] <emgent> not now, for me |
|
[19:22] <jdstrand> though it overlaps with the server team |
|
[19:22] <jdstrand> I think apparmor profiles would be great |
|
[19:22] <keescook> one idea I had was to add a "wishlist" section to the roadmap, and point anyone there that had ideas they wanted to see implemented. |
|
[19:22] <keescook> ooh, yeah |
|
[19:23] <gaten> what about something like a bastille script for ubuntu?? |
|
[19:23] <keescook> I don't mind having TODO items duplicated between teams -- more chance people will work on it :) |
|
[19:23] <jdstrand> while I haven't tried it, wouldn't Debian's bastille work fine on ubuntu? |
|
[19:24] <keescook> I'd also like to add "build FAQ" to the TODO list |
|
[19:24] <gaten> +1 for the wishlist |
|
[19:24] <jdstrand> I like the wishlist idea too |
|
[19:24] <emgent> +1 too |
|
[19:25] <gaten> jdstrand: quite possible. sounds like a TODO |
|
[19:25] <mathiaz> keescook: one of the problem with a whishlist section in the Roadmap is that it can become a long landry list |
|
[19:25] <keescook> mathiaz: true. I figure if it gets that way, we can move it to another page. |
|
[19:25] <mathiaz> keescook: That's why the server Team has a IdeaPool page that is separate from the Roadmpa |
|
[19:25] <gaten> jdstrand: but i would like to see a hardened default config |
|
[19:26] <mathiaz> keescook: the desktop team has a vision wiki page for long term and todo for short trem |
|
[19:26] <keescook> gaten: "hardened" means so many things. what parts did you have in mind? |
|
[19:26] <mathiaz> keescook: and people tend to start discussing things under the wishlist point |
|
[19:27] <keescook> mathiaz: I'm all for generating discussion. any significantly large discussion can be turned into a Blueprint. :) |
|
[19:27] <gaten> keescook: the basics first. umask, ulimit, read access to logs etc |
|
[19:28] <gaten> and i would like to see a firewall thats enabled and has some actual rules on by default. |
|
[19:28] <sdh> agreed on firewall |
|
[19:29] <keescook> gaten: some of that already exists -- it's be great to document a checklist. Can you write a wiki page for that, and link to it in the Wishlist section? |
|
[19:29] <jdstrand> gaten: not sure if you are referring to ufw there, but after an install, a simple 'sudo ufw enable' and you've got a good host-based firewall |
|
[19:29] <keescook> (I've added Wishlist and FAQ to the Roadmap now) |
|
[19:29] <gaten> keescook: sure. when will this whislist be available? |
|
[19:29] <gaten> ahh, nvm |
|
[19:30] <keescook> also, I'd like to see the "KnowledgeBase" link to something useful. |
|
[19:30] <gaten> jdstrand: ahh, wasn;t aware it shipped w/ rules available. but it should still be part of the setup, like 'Do you want to enable the firewall on startup' |
|
[19:30] <keescook> I figure lists of links to other information could be handy there (oss-security link, CVE tracker link, you name it) |
|
[19:31] <gaten> another item I have brought up on the list-server but have done nothing about: chrooted packages (ie apt-get install LAMP-chroot) |
|
[19:32] <jdstrand> gaten: that is a hard problem and very site-specific |
|
[19:32] <jdstrand> however, the 'M' in LAMP is now in apparmor enforcing mode |
|
[19:32] <keescook> :) |
|
[19:33] <jdstrand> gaten: I have been thinking about how to deal with 'A' |
|
[19:33] <gaten> jdstrand: what about using bind-chroot as a stepping stone? and another thing, does chroot become moot if apparmor/selinux are implimented? |
|
=== Rinchen` is now known as Rinchen |
|
[19:33] <jdstrand> gaten: re> chroot moor -- basically yes |
|
[19:33] <keescook> gaten: depends ... I'd say that might be true if kvm/xen are used too |
|
[19:33] <jdstrand> gaten: you get a lot of pain for little gain |
|
[19:33] <keescook> some people use chroots to split up service configs. *shrug* |
|
[19:33] <gaten> well apache is the easiest to chroot of em all, and there are so many scripts out there for it. also you've got mod-chroot if you wanna take the easy way out, still don't think its as secure though |
|
[19:34] <jdstrand> gaten: and it isn't apache that is the problem, it is wirtual hosting and added packages |
|
[19:34] <jdstrand> virtual even |
|
[19:34] <gaten> yes, and updating. ive played that game before |
|
[19:34] <jdstrand> me too |
|
[19:34] <jdstrand> which is why apparmor and selinux can help quite a bit here |
|
[19:35] <gaten> which is why i have wet dreams of apt-get update lam-chroot ;) |
|
[19:35] <keescook> hehe |
|
[19:35] <emgent> hahha |
|
[19:35] <keescook> okay, move on? |
|
[19:35] <gaten> ok, so hold off on that for now then |
|
[19:35] <jdstrand> however, more thought needs to be done on the packaging of the added software and dealing with virtual hosts in a sane way that is easy to profile |
|
[19:35] <keescook> we're skipping MOTU-SWAT membership since we lack any motu-swat admins |
|
[19:35] <jdstrand> gaten: it is absolutely an idea though, feel free to add it :) |
|
[19:35] <keescook> [topic] SELinux progress |
|
[19:36] <MootBot> New Topic: SELinux progress |
|
[19:36] <keescook> propagandist: all yours |
|
[19:36] <propagandist> hey everyone |
|
[19:36] <propagandist> A new bug fix release of SETools was released today which includes transitional packages (and should resolve the major complaint with the last FFE request). |
|
[19:36] <keescook> excellent |
|
[19:36] <keescook> oh, ubotu just left |
|
[19:36] <propagandist> An official release of SELinux was done last week as well. |
|
[19:37] <keescook> for the logs, setools FFe is bug 198391 |
|
[19:37] <propagandist> I'll be integrating these into the packages and reposting to REVU. |
|
[19:37] <keescook> propagandist: ah! that's good news. I'm glad to see that SELinux release. |
|
[19:37] <propagandist> for SETools that means updating the ffe as well |
|
[19:37] <propagandist> for the rest of them do I need to do an FFE? |
|
[19:37] <propagandist> keescook: ;o} |
|
[19:37] <keescook> propagandist: is it a new upstream version? if so, yes. |
|
[19:38] <keescook> what do we gain by updating SELinux? |
|
[19:38] <keescook> [link] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198391 |
|
[19:38] <MootBot> LINK received: https://launchpad.net/bugs/198391 |
|
[19:38] <jdstrand> is this 3.3.4 or a more major update? |
|
[19:39] <propagandist> not too much I would think |
|
[19:39] <propagandist> its 3.3.4 |
|
[19:39] <jdstrand> as this FFE isn't accepted yet, could it just be updated? |
|
[19:39] <propagandist> the upstream selinux ones would only have the advantage of using an official release (but they are basically the same as what we have now) |
|
[19:40] <keescook> propagandist: if the changelog is small, I'm for it, just to be on a "known" release version. |
|
[19:40] <propagandist> jdstrand: yes for setools, i will update the ffe |
|
[19:40] <keescook> [link] http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/code/download-trunk.cfm |
|
[19:40] <MootBot> LINK received: http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/code/download-trunk.cfm |
|
[19:40] <keescook> I see it's at 2.0.59 |
|
[19:41] <propagandist> yup and we are curretly on 2.0.55 |
|
[19:41] <keescook> propagandist: so, beyond those things, how is SELinux on Hardy for you guys? Has it tested out well? |
|
[19:42] <propagandist> keescook: it looks good to me, there is still a mislabeled cups file i need to fix, and some upgrade problems with sepolgen, but in general it looks good |
|
[19:43] <propagandist> keescook: of course I will be fixing those -^ |
|
[19:43] <keescook> propagandist: okay -- beta freeze starts tomorrow IIRC, so I'd recommend focusing on bug fixes first, then FFe later -- the FFes might not get through :) |
|
[19:43] <propagandist> keescook: kk |
|
[19:43] <propagandist> anyone else had a chance to poke at it? |
|
[19:44] <keescook> I booted it once found myself in unconfined X11 session, but it all appears to be running. |
|
[19:44] <keescook> I haven't tried the relabeling since the fsck/usplash integration work was finished. |
|
[19:44] <keescook> I think it'll just look like a regular fsck |
|
[19:45] <keescook> ajmitch, siretart: you guys here? have you played with SELinux in Hardy yet? |
|
[19:46] <keescook> propagandist: did you reproduce the unconfined X session, or do I just have a weird install? |
|
[19:46] <propagandist> keescook: I haven't been able to reproduce it :( |
|
[19:47] <keescook> heh, okay. I'll give it another shot now that I've got kvm running sanely. |
|
[19:47] <keescook> alright, shall we move on? |
|
[19:47] <propagandist> keescook: but maybe i'm misunderstanding because you should be unconfined_t |
|
[19:47] <keescook> oh, that's what I was seeing |
|
[19:47] <propagandist> ah |
|
[19:47] <propagandist> ;o} well all is good then |
|
[19:47] <mathiaz> propagandist: keescook you may wanna ask on ubuntu-hardened for more selinux testing on hardy |
|
[19:47] <keescook> I'm still an SENewb :) |
|
[19:48] <propagandist> ;o} |
|
[19:48] <propagandist> mathiaz: will do |
|
[19:48] <keescook> mathiaz: good idea |
|
[19:48] <mathiaz> and add ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com in the game also |
|
[19:48] <keescook> [action] propagandist to bring up SELinux testing on u-hardened and u-server lists |
|
[19:48] <MootBot> ACTION received: propagandist to bring up SELinux testing on u-hardened and u-server lists |
|
[19:49] <propagandist> kk, i'm all out of status |
|
[19:50] <keescook> okay... Selinux gui utils is skipping (joejaxx is gone) |
|
[19:50] <keescook> er, skipped |
|
[19:50] <keescook> [topic] Hardening Wrapper testing |
|
[19:50] <MootBot> New Topic: Hardening Wrapper testing |
|
[19:50] <keescook> so, I recompiled all of "main" will the wrappers enabled. |
|
[19:51] <keescook> I tried full, no-pie, and no-hardening. |
|
[19:51] <keescook> overall, the results were good |
|
[19:51] <keescook> [link] http://people.ubuntu.com/~kees/hardening/ |
|
[19:51] <MootBot> LINK received: http://people.ubuntu.com/~kees/hardening/ |
|
[19:51] <keescook> I have all the build logs saved |
|
[19:51] <keescook> but I threw out the .debs since I didn't have space for it |
|
[19:52] <keescook> if people are interested in going through the "ok-nohardening.txt" file to figure out what's failing, and opening bugs for it, that would rock |
|
[19:52] <keescook> (same goes for ok-nopie.txt, but those are likely a bit trickier) |
|
[19:52] <jdstrand> keescook: did you get a chance to try the rebuild with the i386 personality? |
|
[19:53] <keescook> jdstrand: oh! no, I didn't. |
|
[19:53] <keescook> I will start one up over the weekend. |
|
[19:53] <gaten> keescook: do we have a priority for certain packages in nohardening? |
|
[19:53] <keescook> I'm also considering generating a PPA that is exclusively hardened builds. |
|
[19:53] <jdstrand> <mrburns>excellent</mrburns> |
|
[19:54] <keescook> gaten: no real priority -- my goal is to have those two text files be 0 length by the end of intrepid. :) |
|
[19:54] <keescook> but I know it's going to be a lot of work. |
|
[19:54] <gaten> heh, roger that |
|
[19:54] <keescook> I want to run the PPA idea past the soyuz folks so I don't get poked in the eye :) |
|
[19:55] <siretart> keescook: re selinux in hardy: yes, at my departmend we had a course (a week fulltime) were two students played with selinux in hardy |
|
[19:56] <keescook> a concern brought up on the Debian devel mailing list is one of performance. All the measurements I've done show less than 1% loss for PIE |
|
[19:56] <keescook> siretart: the new stuff that tresys has worked on? |
|
[19:56] <siretart> exactly. I instructed them to use the ubuntu-hardened PPA |
|
[19:56] <keescook> PIE> I am not a statistician. :) |
|
[19:56] <keescook> siretart: cool! |
|
[19:57] <propagandist> siretart: !! |
|
[19:57] <siretart> the objective was writing 2 policy modules: one for mt-daapd and one for boxbackup |
|
[19:57] <propagandist> siretart: awsome :o} how did it go? |
|
[19:57] <siretart> propagandist: the __sns__ guy was one of the two students, you remember? ;) |
|
[19:57] <siretart> both were successfully |
|
[19:57] <siretart> some tools behaved a bit strange compared to fedora |
|
[19:58] <propagandist> oh? which ones? |
|
[19:59] <siretart> IIRC adding new selinux users, and listing selinux users. it looked like ubuntu had a different version of the tools or something |
|
[20:00] <siretart> I have to admit that I don't remember exactly |
|
[20:00] <propagandist> ah i see |
|
[20:00] <jdstrand> siretart: how long ago was this? |
|
[20:00] <siretart> 18.2.2008-22.2.2008 |
|
[20:00] <siretart> was that course |
|
[20:02] <keescook> emgent had to leave early due to stuff out of his control, so he asked that his topics be postponed |
|
[20:03] <jdstrand> well, seems the selinux reprise is over |
|
[20:03] <siretart> anyways, I had a rather good impression of selinux in ubuntu |
|
[20:03] <keescook> \o/ |
|
[20:03] <propagandist> siretart: thanks for the feedback :o} its great to hear that it worked for them |
|
[20:03] <jdstrand> keescook: has there been any more discussion of enabling hardening-wrapper on specific packages |
|
[20:03] <jdstrand> ? |
|
[20:03] <siretart> what was most surprising is that the "new" unconfined module in ubuntu was behaving very differently than most documentation out there |
|
[20:04] <jdstrand> keescook: ie what I added to the Roadmap? |
|
[20:04] <jdstrand> I admit I haven't done anything with it |
|
[20:04] <siretart> e.g. we didn't manage to get the gpg module work in ubuntu at all |
|
[20:04] <keescook> jdstrand: there hasn't been -- I've been waiting to get feedback from doko about the hardened builds. |
|
[20:04] * jdstrand nods |
|
[20:04] <keescook> for us to build stuff with hardening enabled vi Build-Deps (not the buildds) we'd need to promote hardening-wrapper to main, etc |
|
[20:05] <siretart> I think what's needed here most is more documentation/explanation how the unconfined module is supposed to work in ubuntu. |
|
[20:06] <keescook> jdstrand: so, at least we could provide PPAs for hardened builds too. |
|
[20:07] <jdstrand> keescook: that would be a good alternative. I'm just really excited about hardening wrapper and thinking about how this is an LTS release |
|
[20:07] <NthDegree> yes indeed siretart |
|
[20:07] <propagandist> siretart: kk, i'll look at adding it to the wiki, if you can send me more information on the problems you had getting gpg working that will help |
|
[20:07] <keescook> jdstrand: yeah, I wish it could have happened earlier, but this is how it worked out. :( |
|
[20:07] <doko> keescook: yeah ... |
|
[20:08] <keescook> doko: oh! hey there. :) |
|
[20:09] <NthDegree> just to satisfy my curiosity: how is unconfined going to handle mprotect ideally? |
|
[20:10] <doko> keescook: just found me doing uploads for reports assigned to some k...c... |
|
[20:11] <keescook> doko: oh? |
|
[20:11] <siretart> propagandist: well, afaiu, the gpg module is not supposed to run from the unconfined role, and a role transition was neccessary to do that. I think a small howto or example module or something how to enable the gpg module for 'normal' users would be a great example! |
|
[20:11] <propagandist> NthDegree: Can you clarify? |
|
[20:11] <NthDegree> propagandist: preventing execstack, execmem, execmod etc. |
|
[20:12] <NthDegree> Fedora prevents that in normal "unconfined".. will Ubuntu have it the reverse way? |
|
[20:12] <NthDegree> as in tagging apps gradually that can safely be restricted, and leaving the rest truly unrestricted |
|
[20:15] <keescook> say, let's move the selinux discussion to #ubuntu-hardened, and I can close up this meeting. :) |
|
[20:15] <keescook> we've got no more topics |
|
[20:15] <propagandist> kk :o} |
|
[20:15] <keescook> [topic] schedule |
|
[20:15] <MootBot> New Topic: schedule |
|
[20:15] <keescook> next meeting in two weeks, same time? |
|
[20:15] <jdstrand> good with me |
|
[20:16] * jdstrand will be sure to remember his timezone next time |
|
[20:16] <keescook> heh |
|
[20:16] <keescook> okay, thanks very much everyone! great work all around. :) |
|
[20:16] <keescook> #endmeeting |
|
[20:16] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 20:16. |
|
[20:17] <jdstrand> thanks keescook! |
|
[20:17] <gaten> thanks all |
|
[20:17] <keescook> :) |
|
[20:22] * faulkes- whistles innocently |
|
[20:26] <zul> @schedule montreal |
|
[20:26] <ubotu> Schedule for America/Montreal: 12 Mar 17:00: Server Team | 14 Mar 16:00: MOTU | 14 Mar 17:00: REVU Coordination | 19 Mar 17:00: Server Team | 26 Mar 17:00: Server Team |
|
=== \sh_away is now known as \sh |
|
[20:45] <txwikinger> @schedule |
|
[20:45] <ubotu> Schedule for Etc/UTC: 12 Mar 21:00: Server Team | 14 Mar 20:00: MOTU | 14 Mar 21:00: REVU Coordination | 19 Mar 21:00: Server Team | 26 Mar 21:00: Server Team |
|
=== ubotu changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Current meeting: Server Team Calendar: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/event | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/ | 14 Mar 20:00 UTC: MOTU | 14 Mar 21:00 UTC: REVU Coordination | 19 Mar 21:00 UTC: Server Team | 26 Mar 21:00 UTC: Server Team |
|
[20:58] * mathiaz gets ready for the server team meeting... |
|
[20:58] <ivoks> hi |
|
[20:59] <sommer> o// |
|
[20:59] <jdstrand> hi! |
|
[20:59] <owh> hiya |
|
[21:00] <soren> Hi, guys. |
|
[21:00] * nealmcb waves |
|
[21:00] * nijaba waves |
|
[21:01] <nealmcb> sommer: I just made some changes to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ServerGUI |
|
[21:01] <owh> nijaba: Updated the launch text a few moments ago. |
|
[21:01] <mathiaz> Let's get started for this week meeting |
|
[21:01] <mathiaz> #startmeeting |
|
[21:01] <MootBot> Meeting started at 21:01. The chair is mathiaz. |
|
[21:01] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] |
|
[21:01] <sommer> nealmcb: cool |
|
[21:01] <dendrobates> o/ |
|
[21:01] <mathiaz> Today's agenda: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/Meeting |
|
[21:02] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting. |
|
[21:02] <MootBot> New Topic: Review ACTION points from previous meeting. |
|
[21:02] <mathiaz> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20080305 |
|
[21:03] <mathiaz> So I've sent an email about the ServerTestingTeam |
|
[21:03] <mathiaz> And I've noticed that some new pages were created in the wiki |
|
[21:03] <mathiaz> Again - anyone that has some server hardware available is welcome to test drive hardy. |
|
[21:04] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] Server survey |
|
[21:04] <MootBot> New Topic: Server survey |
|
[21:04] <mathiaz> The reportingpage has been updated |
|
[21:04] <mathiaz> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/ReportingPage |
|
[21:04] * soren blushes as he realises he hasn't sent anything for that page :( |
|
[21:05] <mathiaz> nijaba: any news on the hosting front ? |
|
[21:05] <owh> soren: You could have updated it and blamed it on "caching" :) |
|
[21:05] <nijaba> we are waiting for an audit from kees |
|
[21:05] <nijaba> it should be done soon |
|
[21:06] <soren> owh: Encouraging dishonesty? Tsk, tsk :) |
|
[21:06] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] iSCSI support |
|
[21:06] <MootBot> New Topic: iSCSI support |
|
[21:06] <soren> I talked to Rick. |
|
[21:06] <mathiaz> soren: did you have a change to talk with steve about root fs support ? |
|
[21:06] <soren> We decided we wanted to do it. |
|
[21:06] * keescook ran out of time last friday. |
|
[21:07] <soren> I e-mailed slangasek asking if it was ok. I haven't heard back. |
|
[21:07] <nijaba> \o/ |
|
[21:07] <faulkes-> evening |
|
[21:07] <soren> This was Friday, I believe. I should poke him some more. |
|
[21:07] <mathiaz> soren: that would be post-beta work I guess |
|
=== never|mobi is now known as neversfelde|mobi |
|
[21:08] <mathiaz> [ACTION] soren to talk with slangasek about iSCSI support for root fs. |
|
[21:08] <MootBot> ACTION received: soren to talk with slangasek about iSCSI support for root fs. |
|
[21:09] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] Bacula status |
|
[21:09] <MootBot> New Topic: Bacula status |
|
[21:09] <ivoks> hi |
|
[21:09] <mathiaz> ivoks: what's the state of your work on that ? |
|
[21:09] <ivoks> it needs one day of work |
|
[21:10] <ivoks> tomorrow it will be ready for inspection |
|
[21:10] <mathiaz> ivoks: great |
|
[21:11] <mathiaz> who can do the inspection ? |
|
[21:11] <ivoks> if someone want to see debdiff, http://www.grad.hr/~ivoks/bacula.diff |
|
[21:11] <nijaba> beta freeze starts tomorrow |
|
[21:11] <sommer> so is bacula going to make it into main? |
|
[21:11] <mathiaz> probably not before beta |
|
[21:11] <ivoks> ok, then it will be finished in couple of hours |
|
[21:11] <nijaba> we have yet to file a mir, though... |
|
[21:11] <sommer> for hardy release? |
|
[21:12] <ivoks> debdiff is already over 1000 lines |
|
[21:12] * zul cries |
|
[21:12] <sommer> either way I was just wondering if we should add a section to the docs or not? |
|
[21:12] <ivoks> zul: it's not that bad :) |
|
[21:13] <mathiaz> considering that we're changing a lot of the packaging, we should ask for FFexception |
|
[21:13] <mathiaz> or should it be considered as just bug fixes ? |
|
[21:14] <nijaba> these are mainly bug fixes to match requirements, IIRC |
|
[21:14] <ivoks> there are also new features |
|
[21:14] <ivoks> like new catalog_backup script |
|
[21:15] <mathiaz> isn't that a fix for the security issues raised ? |
|
[21:15] <ivoks> it is |
|
[21:15] <ivoks> anyway... i'll finish it in couple of hours |
|
[21:16] <nijaba> so it is a bug fix ;) |
|
[21:16] <mathiaz> anyway - since the diff seems large, it may worth asking for a FFe to the motu-release team |
|
[21:16] <mathiaz> zul: can you review the bacula diff ? |
|
[21:16] <zul> mathiaz: sure.. |
|
[21:16] <mathiaz> zul: and figure out whether a FFe is needed or not |
|
[21:17] <zul> I can do it tomorrow |
|
[21:17] <mathiaz> [ACTION] ivoks to post an updated debdiff for bacula |
|
[21:17] <MootBot> ACTION received: ivoks to post an updated debdiff for bacula |
|
[21:17] <mathiaz> [ACTION] zul to review the bacula debdiff |
|
[21:17] <MootBot> ACTION received: zul to review the bacula debdiff |
|
[21:17] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] mysql testing |
|
[21:17] <MootBot> New Topic: mysql testing |
|
[21:17] <mathiaz> jdstrand: what did you do to mysql ? |
|
[21:18] <ivoks> zul: i'll be online, so contact me if you have questions |
|
[21:18] <jdstrand> I have been preparing a security update for mysql |
|
[21:18] <zul> ivoks: sure thanks |
|
[21:18] <jdstrand> there are several issues that are addressed |
|
[21:18] <jdstrand> 2 required a rather substantial patch |
|
[21:19] <jdstrand> all of this is documented in bug #201009 |
|
[21:19] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 201009 in mysql-dfsg-5.0 "[mysql-dfsg-5.0] fix for several open vulnerabilities in -proposed" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/201009 |
|
[21:19] <jdstrand> the short summary is that CVE-2007-6303 and CVE-2007-2692 required quite a bit of work to fix dapper - feisty |
|
[21:19] <ubotu> MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.51a, 5.1.x before 5.1.23, and 6.0.x before 6.0.4 does not update the DEFINER value of a view when the view is altered, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges via a sequence of statements including a CREATE SQL SECURITY DEFINER VIEW statement and an ALTER VIEW statement. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-6303) |
|
[21:19] <ubotu> The mysql_change_db function in MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.40 and 5.1.x before 5.1.18 does not restore THD::db_access privileges when returning from SQL SECURITY INVOKER stored routines, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-2692) |
|
[21:19] <jdstrand> as such, I have uploaded the packages to -proposed for wider testing |
|
[21:20] <jdstrand> they have received a good bit of testing already, and they look good here |
|
[21:20] <jdstrand> I'd really appreciate it if people could test these packages and report 'works here' in that bug report, so I can push the update out next week |
|
[21:21] <mathiaz> jdstrand: great |
|
[21:21] <nijaba> jdstrand: there is a version for dapper? |
|
[21:22] <jdstrand> because gutsy is so close to upstream, its patches weren't significant |
|
[21:22] <mathiaz> jdstrand: You've already sent a couple emails on different mailing lists |
|
[21:22] <mathiaz> jdstrand: could you post something to the forums ? |
|
[21:22] <jdstrand> really looking for dapper (and edgy and feisty if possible) |
|
[21:22] <mathiaz> jdstrand: or ask faulkes- about it ? |
|
[21:22] <jdstrand> nijaba: 5.0.22 |
|
[21:22] <jdstrand> is faulkes- around? |
|
[21:22] <mathiaz> jdstrand: I think there is developer forum that is targeted at that |
|
[21:22] <jdstrand> mathiaz: but to answer your question-- sure |
|
[21:23] <mathiaz> jdstrand: altought I'm not sure if the people reading the developer forums would be able to test your updates |
|
[21:23] <jdstrand> nijaba: oh heh, I read your question to quickly-- yes dapper has updates and I'd really like testing there |
|
[21:24] <jdstrand> mathiaz: couldn't hurt |
|
[21:24] <nijaba> ok, I'll test it on my prod server |
|
[21:24] <mathiaz> jdstrand: could you coordinate with faulkes- about requesting feedback in the forums ? |
|
[21:24] <nijaba> and blame you if it blows up ;) |
|
[21:24] <jdstrand> nijaba: yes, you would be within your rights on that |
|
[21:25] <mathiaz> [ACTION] jdstrand to coordinate with faulkes- about mysql testing in the forums |
|
[21:25] <MootBot> ACTION received: jdstrand to coordinate with faulkes- about mysql testing in the forums |
|
[21:25] * jdstrand won't mention testing updtes on a production server, as he really wants as much testing as possible |
|
[21:25] <jdstrand> ;) |
|
[21:26] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] LSB compliant init script |
|
[21:26] <MootBot> New Topic: LSB compliant init script |
|
[21:26] <mathiaz> kirkland: owh: you've started to look into that |
|
[21:26] <mathiaz> what is the outcome ? |
|
[21:26] <owh> We started creating some code to get output. |
|
[21:26] <kirkland> mathiaz: we have a list of all packages in Main, and Universe that install something in /etc/init.d |
|
[21:26] <owh> We've created an initial list of the hardy .iso: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OnnoBenschop/ubuntu-server/init.d-status |
|
[21:27] <owh> Next step is testing what they output :) |
|
[21:27] <ScottK2> Is this really a project we ought to be starting a day before beta freeze? |
|
[21:27] <mathiaz> LSB compliant means a lot of things - what are you trying to fix first ? |
|
[21:28] <mathiaz> I think trying to get the status action for the daemons makes sense |
|
[21:28] <kirkland> mathiaz: a "status" action by init scripts is one of the things required for LSB |
|
[21:28] <kirkland> mathiaz: in most cases, it's a trivial patch |
|
[21:28] <mathiaz> having a fully compliant init script may require too much work though |
|
[21:28] <owh> We start small and work our way up. |
|
[21:29] <mathiaz> kirkland: well - there is also the headers for startup sequence |
|
[21:29] <kirkland> mathiaz: for services (and mainly those in ubuntu-server), i think it's important enough to have in Hardy, and minor enough code changes |
|
[21:29] <owh> We started with the packages installed by tasksel on the ubuntu-server install. |
|
[21:29] <ScottK2> Personally I think adding features to inits is adding features and should be done at the appropriate point in the development cycle for feature development. |
|
[21:29] <kirkland> mathiaz: full compliance is beyond the scope I'm suggesting |
|
[21:29] <owh> It's a fair point ScottK2 |
|
[21:30] <mathiaz> ScottK2: right. OTOH not having a status action for init script is really annoying |
|
[21:30] <owh> And I figure if we're serious with ebox, it will need to know if stuff is working - no? |
|
[21:31] <mathiaz> so trying to add a status action for packages that are on the ubuntu-server iso seems to be a good compromise |
|
[21:31] <kirkland> mathiaz: i agree with that |
|
[21:31] <owh> All of them, or only the ones that are installed by a tasksel server selection? |
|
[21:31] <ScottK2> It's not nearly annoying as having a broken init script on release day. |
|
[21:32] <mathiaz> ScottK2: I'd say that testing an init script is easy. |
|
[21:32] <ScottK2> mathiaz: I think if you want to pursue this you should ask ubuntu-release for an FFe. |
|
[21:32] <owh> There's only 7 that don't have a status that are installed by a tasksel *server selection |
|
[21:32] <mathiaz> ScottK2: aggreed. |
|
[21:32] <mathiaz> ScottK2: I was about to suggest that we should talk to ubuntu-release about this. |
|
[21:32] <ScottK2> It all depends on the init. |
|
[21:32] <kirkland> ScottK2: the risk is having an init script with a broken 'status' action on release day |
|
[21:32] <ScottK2> kirkland: We have lots on unimplemented features. |
|
[21:32] <kirkland> we should not be affecting the start/stop/(other) actions |
|
[21:33] <mathiaz> kirkland: could you update the Roadmap with a clear scope on what we aim at ? |
|
[21:33] <ScottK2> kirkland: Agree with should not. |
|
[21:33] <owh> There are only 4 that have a status option so far. |
|
[21:33] <nealmcb> I'd suggest taking it one package as a time - if the patch is trivial and fixes the "non-lsb-compliant" bug, then it is worthwhile given the 5 year lifespan of hardy. but I know it is also risky |
|
[21:33] <mathiaz> kirkland: and also list the packages targeted for hardy ? |
|
[21:33] <kirkland> mathiaz: will do |
|
[21:33] <mathiaz> kirkland: once the list is there, we can ask ubuntu-release to have a look at it and get a FFe for it. |
|
[21:34] <kirkland> nealmcb: I agree with your LTS comment, plus the fact that this is "catch-up" for many key services on ubuntu-server |
|
[21:34] <mathiaz> kirkland: however we won't have this ready by beta. |
|
[21:35] <nealmcb> at any rate, thanks for gathering the data, folks.... |
|
[21:35] <mathiaz> kirkland: the archive freeze is tomorrow - and these are patches that are not show-stoppers for the beta release |
|
[21:35] <owh> That gives us 24 hours :) |
|
[21:36] <kirkland> owh: with 2/7 done |
|
[21:36] <zul> uh...no it gives you less than that |
|
[21:36] <mathiaz> [ACTION] kirkland to update the Roadmap outlining the scope of the work - just add status action |
|
[21:36] <MootBot> ACTION received: kirkland to update the Roadmap outlining the scope of the work - just add status action |
|
[21:36] * nealmcb would love to have status-getting documentation that doesn't have to say "except on hardy" for a long time |
|
[21:36] <owh> Seriously, the packages on the CD, there are really not that many if we limit ourselves to tasksel only stuff. |
|
[21:36] <mathiaz> [ACTION] kirkland to ask ubuntu-release for a FFe for each of the packages. |
|
[21:36] <MootBot> ACTION received: kirkland to ask ubuntu-release for a FFe for each of the packages. |
|
[21:38] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] libdb4.x transition |
|
[21:38] <MootBot> New Topic: libdb4.x transition |
|
[21:38] <mathiaz> there has been some work done on this. |
|
[21:39] <mathiaz> mruiz has been working on a couple of them - and contacted some upstream about the transition. Some of the upstream added a check in the configure script for a specific version of libdb. |
|
[21:39] <mathiaz> zul: is the Roadmap updated wrt to the package you've uploaded ? |
|
[21:39] <zul> mathiaz: afaik yes |
|
[21:40] <zul> yes it is...mruiz is doing the rest of them |
|
[21:40] <mathiaz> ScottK2: is there any packages for libdb4.4 and libdb4.5 ? |
|
[21:41] <ScottK2> mathiaz: There are, but I haven't had time to look |
|
[21:41] <mathiaz> ScottK2: ok - so may be we should concentrate on libdb4.3 |
|
[21:41] <ScottK2> Yes. |
|
[21:42] <mathiaz> ScottK2: and then jump to libdb4.4 and 4.5 |
|
[21:42] <ScottK2> Yes |
|
[21:42] <ScottK2> lidbd4.2 will be sticking around, so no point worrying about that one right now. |
|
[21:42] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] Server Guide documentation |
|
[21:42] <MootBot> New Topic: Server Guide documentation |
|
[21:42] <mathiaz> ScottK2: yeah - related to openldap |
|
[21:42] <ScottK2> Exactly |
|
[21:42] <mathiaz> sommer: so how is the string freeze going ? |
|
[21:43] <sommer> getting there |
|
[21:43] <sommer> added an ebox section if people would like to review |
|
[21:43] <mathiaz> sommer: do you have section that needs focus for review ? |
|
[21:43] <sommer> probably the virt section... working with nijaba and soren on it |
|
[21:44] <sommer> I should have an update for it this evening... the current version isn't quite accurate |
|
[21:44] <mathiaz> sommer: ok - I'll look into also as I'm still setting up my new vm environement. |
|
[21:45] <sommer> mathiaz: cool, the more the marrier |
|
[21:45] <mathiaz> keescook and jdstrand have also migrated to kvm IIRC |
|
[21:45] <jdstrand> yep |
|
[21:45] <jdstrand> loving it |
|
[21:45] <nealmcb> :-) |
|
[21:45] <jdstrand> much less resource intensive than vmware |
|
[21:45] <sommer> other than that just working through the rest of the sections and updating minor adjustments for hardy |
|
[21:46] <nijaba> at least sommer does it in real condition: remotely |
|
[21:46] <sommer> heh... attempts to :-) |
|
[21:46] <mathiaz> sommer: could you update the Roadmap with a list of the section you'd ask for review ? |
|
[21:46] <dendrobates> sommer: I should get the likewise-open man pages by tomorrow. |
|
[21:46] <soren> I had 10 vm's running at the same time a few days ago. Worked fine. |
|
[21:46] <mathiaz> sommer: so that we can point people to it and focus our efforts on that. |
|
[21:46] <sommer> mathiaz: sure |
|
[21:47] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] sommer to update the roadmap section with a list of section of the server guide that need reviews. |
|
[21:47] <MootBot> New Topic: sommer to update the roadmap section with a list of section of the server guide that need reviews. |
|
[21:47] <sommer> dendrobates: that's cool, I noticed the ffe bug. |
|
[21:47] <mathiaz> nealmcb: could you update the factoids by adding a servergui entry ? |
|
[21:47] <nealmcb> I sent mail a little while ago |
|
[21:48] <mathiaz> !servergui |
|
[21:48] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about servergui - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi |
|
[21:48] <nealmcb> mail to the server team... |
|
[21:48] <nealmcb> if folks like what I wrote, and the servergui changes, I'll talk to the ops |
|
[21:48] <faulkes-> I now have hardware and a requirement for virtuals, so I'll be doing kvm stuff very soon |
|
[21:49] <nealmcb> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ServerGUI |
|
[21:49] <nealmcb> (that's mostly sommer's work of course - just a few edits by me) |
|
[21:49] <mathiaz> nealmcb: I think it looks good |
|
[21:49] <jdstrand> I should mention that while I have been loving kvm |
|
[21:49] <mathiaz> nealmcb: and should be added |
|
[21:50] <jdstrand> and have moved all my vmware machines to it |
|
[21:50] <nealmcb> will do |
|
=== _czessi is now known as Czessi |
|
[21:50] <mathiaz> nealmcb: I can't seem to find your email to the server team about the servergui entry |
|
[21:50] <jdstrand> there is some adjustments that need to be made on pre-hardy vms |
|
[21:50] <nealmcb> just half an hour ago |
|
[21:50] <mathiaz> [ACTION] nealmcb to add an entry for the servergui factoid |
|
[21:50] <MootBot> ACTION received: nealmcb to add an entry for the servergui factoid |
|
[21:50] <jdstrand> I will update the wiki accordingly (probably tomorrow) |
|
[21:51] <jdstrand> additionally, there is s script available to help migrate |
|
[21:51] <mathiaz> nealmcb: ah ok - I haven't checked my email |
|
[21:51] <jdstrand> vmware images to kvm: |
|
[21:51] <jdstrand> http://people.ubuntu.com/~soren/vmware2libvirt |
|
[21:51] <MootBot> LINK received: http://people.ubuntu.com/~soren/vmware2libvirt |
|
[21:51] * owh hugs jdstrand |
|
[21:51] * owh thanks soren for the code. |
|
[21:52] <nealmcb> I did change one part of the recommend apt-get commands... |
|
[21:52] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] LTS upgrades |
|
[21:52] <MootBot> New Topic: LTS upgrades |
|
[21:52] <mathiaz> so what are our current efforts in that area ? |
|
[21:53] <soren> owh: Oh, it's jdstrand's doing. All of it. |
|
[21:53] <soren> owh: I just stole it and threw it on people.ubuntu.com :) |
|
[21:53] <owh> ROTFL |
|
[21:54] <mathiaz> so I guess we're doing really good on LTS upgrade testing if noone has anything to report |
|
[21:55] <jdstrand> mathiaz: I would not assume that |
|
[21:55] <jdstrand> :) |
|
[21:55] <jdstrand> mathiaz: I was until a moment ago silent because I haven't done it |
|
[21:55] <ScottK2> I can unequivicably (or however that's spelled) say that I have not encountered any errors in LTS to LTS upgrade testing. |
|
[21:55] * jdstrand could say the same |
|
[21:56] <mathiaz> well - my question then is: what was LTS-to-LTS-upgrade-tested ? |
|
[21:56] * sommer needs to make time for testing LTS on LTS action |
|
[21:56] <nealmcb> ScottK2: but what fractions of the upgrades have been successful? Any singularities encountered? |
|
[21:56] <nealmcb> :-) |
|
[21:56] <mathiaz> ScottK2: I guess you've tested postfix and mail daemon |
|
[21:57] <ScottK2> Actually I haven't directly, but I've tested direct upgrades of Postfix to modern versions on Dapper with no trouble for backports |
|
[21:58] <mathiaz> well - we still need to focus on LTS-to-LTS upgrades |
|
[21:58] <mathiaz> especially now that we're about to release beta |
|
[21:58] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] Any Other Business |
|
[21:58] <MootBot> New Topic: Any Other Business |
|
[21:59] <mathiaz> anyone wants to add something ? |
|
[21:59] <mathiaz> soren: could you update the ReportingPage with a virtualization section ? |
|
[21:59] <ScottK2> mathiaz: Any chance now for tasksel changes? |
|
[21:59] <owh> And a migration guide :) |
|
[21:59] <mathiaz> dendrobates: same thing for likewise-open ? |
|
[22:00] <mathiaz> ScottK2: you mean the dovecot+postfix integration ? |
|
[22:00] <ScottK2> mathiaz: Yes. |
|
[22:00] <soren> mathiaz: Will do. |
|
[22:01] <ScottK2> I wanted to see about integrating amavisd-new since we finally got it in Main |
|
[22:01] <mathiaz> ScottK2: I think that ivoks updated the patch for the new version of tasksel |
|
[22:01] <mathiaz> ScottK2: now it needs a FFe and then a core-dev can upload it |
|
[22:01] <soren> "unequivocably", I think, by the way. |
|
[22:02] * kirkland quivs with soren |
|
[22:02] <ScottK2> soren: That looks right |
|
[22:02] <ScottK2> mathiaz: Do you have a bug number? If there's a patch, I'll look into FFe. |
|
[22:03] <mathiaz> ScottK2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/164837 |
|
[22:03] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 164837 in dovecot "Dovecot SASL for postfix" [Low,In progress] |
|
[22:03] * ScottK2 looks |
|
[22:03] <mathiaz> [TOPIC] Agree on next meeting date and time. |
|
[22:03] <MootBot> New Topic: Agree on next meeting date and time. |
|
[22:03] <mathiaz> Same time, same place, next week ? |
|
[22:04] <nealmcb> yes - utc-wise :-) |
|
[22:04] <mathiaz> well - 21:00 UTC |
|
[22:04] <nxvl> meeting is already over? |
|
[22:05] <mathiaz> the time hasn't changed - only the some part of the world decided to move forward in time |
|
[22:05] <ivoks> mathiaz: yes, i've updated it |
|
[22:05] <ivoks> ScottK2: no, i didn't put amavis in it; and i'm not big fan of doing amavis filtering by default |
|
[22:06] <ivoks> ScottK2: i think we should leave that to people who know what it is for |
|
[22:06] <ivoks> otherwise, we'll have angry users complaining that their ubuntu mail server kills mail |
|
[22:07] <ScottK2> ivoks: Fair enough |
|
[22:07] <ScottK2> It's certain not something we should shove in at the last minute if there's no consensus. |
|
[22:07] <ivoks> ScottK2: amavis bounces mail with exe attachments by default, so... i don't know... |
|
[22:07] <mathiaz> Ok - so next meeting: next week, same time same place |
|
[22:07] <ScottK2> We'd need to come up with a do no harm config |
|
[22:08] <mathiaz> Thanks all for attending ! :) |
|
[22:08] <ivoks> ScottK2: yeah... i'm still in a quest for ideal amavis config :) |
|
[22:08] <mathiaz> #endmeeting |
|
[22:08] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 22:08. |
|
[22:08] <ivoks> ScottK2: and, it would love to see mailzu integrated with amavis |
|
[22:08] <sommer> thanks mathiaz, later all |
|
[22:09] <nijaba> thanks all |
|
=== \sh is now known as \sh_away |
|
=== ubotu changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Calendar: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/event | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/ | 14 Mar 20:00 UTC: MOTU | 14 Mar 21:00 UTC: REVU Coordination | 19 Mar 21:00 UTC: Server Team | 26 Mar 21:00 UTC: Server Team |
|
|