| [00:01] <ln-> Package: linux-image-2.6.15-51-686 | |
| [00:01] <ln-> Version: 2.6.15-51.64 | |
| [00:01] <BenC> that's not the one with the fix | |
| [00:01] <BenC> it was fixed in 51.65 | |
| [00:01] <BenC> make sure you have all the latest updates from dapper-security | |
| [00:01] <BenC> reboot, and retest | |
| [00:02] <ln-> i do have all the updates from dapper-security... | |
| [00:05] <BenC> either you're mistaken, or that upload has not been released yet...either way, you aren't testing the version that has the fix | |
| [00:05] <BenC> I'm checking the upload status, give me a minute | |
| [00:05] <ln-> thanks | |
| === reynaldo_ is now known as reynaldo | |
| [00:09] <BenC> ln-: looks like that upload is pending | |
| [00:09] <BenC> ln-: kees would know more | |
| [00:13] <ln-> do you think there's something wrong in ubuntu's "process," if a thing broken in Oct 2006 doesn't get fixed by Feb 2008, even if the fix is known and is trivial? | |
| [00:15] <BenC> ln-: considering there's a work around and there is no data-loss involved, it's a rather trivial issue to begin with | |
| [00:15] <BenC> ln-: kees handles security, so you really should talk to him | |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | |
| [00:16] <ln-> i'll try to ping him again tomorrow. | |
| [00:25] <ln-> ... or why bother. | |
| [00:27] <BenC> ln-: well, if there's is an issue with the process, kees would be willing to explain or possibly improve | |
| [00:27] <BenC> ln-: I'm sure he would appreciate input, or being put on the spot :) | |
| [00:28] <ln-> ok, i'll ping him then.. | |
| [00:49] <Kano> laga: somehow this kernel has problems to be used with live-helper | |
| [01:04] <Kano> so something else is wrong.. | |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | |
| === antdedyet is now known as E_NOMAD | |
| === E_NOMAD is now known as antdedyet | |
| === antdedyet is now known as technomad | |
| === technomad is now known as technoant | |
| === technoant is now known as technogeek | |
| === technogeek is now known as technoant | |
| [08:34] <kraut> moin | |
| [09:13] <Kano> hi, current aufs in lum works for me | |
| [09:13] <Kano> but | |
| [09:15] <Kano> with standard ubuntu config (too many old legacy drivers) i get this | |
| [09:15] <Kano> http://paste.debian.net/48033 | |
| [09:15] <Kano> which results in no dma for hdc | |
| [09:16] <Kano> a pure libata kernel has no problem at all with it... | |
| [09:18] <Kano> also, i see no reason to try blacklists on those 2 modules, debian has even bcm43xx completely disabled, you could do that too | |
| [09:18] <Kano> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/185719 | |
| [09:18] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 185719 in linux "remove duplicate pci ids bcm43xx/ssb prism54/p54pci" [Medium,Triaged] | |
| [09:18] <Kano> as soon as tools like discover are installed blacklisting does not work | |
| [09:19] <Kano> hostap_pci is completely unstable btw. dont know why | |
| [09:19] <Kano> p54pci works fine | |
| [09:26] <Kano> did anybody try ath5k? | |
| [10:16] <laga> hey juliank | |
| [10:17] <laga> juliank: aufs doesn't work with nfs branches. it was complaining that i need to apply the lhash patch (and add the config option) | |
| [10:18] <juliank> laga: Are you running the latest git kernel? | |
| [10:18] <Kano> hi laga , well it worked for live mode, but you can add those ;) | |
| [10:19] <laga> juliank: "latest" as in "pulled right after rtg committed your patches", yes. | |
| [10:19] <laga> Kano: great :) | |
| [10:19] <Kano> did you get the link in pm? | |
| [10:19] <laga> yes | |
| [10:20] <Kano> it has some problems shutting down, but before i got kde boot errors | |
| [10:20] <laga> haven't tried it yet, i don't need live disks at the moment :) | |
| [10:20] <laga> oh | |
| [10:20] <Kano> you can use vbox or vmware to boot it too | |
| [10:20] <juliank> laga: the latest ubuntu-hardy.git + ubuntu-hardy-lum.git should work | |
| [10:20] <Kano> you will see a huge difference when you boot with union=unionfs | |
| [10:20] <laga> Kano: speed-wise? | |
| [10:20] <Kano> then network-manager does not work | |
| [10:21] <Kano> i dont get why the same kernel works on hardy with networkmanager | |
| [10:21] <Kano> with unionfs | |
| [10:23] <Kano> maybe somebody changed networkmanager | |
| [10:23] <laga> my nick comes up #2 in google when you search for "unionfs sucks", so don't expect an answer from me | |
| [10:24] <Kano> good point ;) | |
| [10:25] <laga> note: i've changed my opinion since then. current unionfs is probably just fine with a vanilla kernel, but i guess i'll never find out :) | |
| [10:25] <Kano> well not for me, with the test i did... | |
| [10:27] <laga> juliank: the changes which have been committed since then are not relevant - except for the missing entries in debian/config/i386 which i added myself | |
| [10:28] <Kano> i even had the strange issue with unionfs that in a vm a simple du -h /dir returned an error - a real pc did not have that error however | |
| [10:28] <laga> odd. | |
| [10:28] <juliank> laga: do cat /sys/fs/aufs/config | |
| [10:28] <laga> unionfs doesn't work well with bonnie either. not sure what's causing that. | |
| [10:28] <Kano> could never trace it why this happend, aufs worked | |
| [10:31] <juliank> laga: what does not work? build or mount? | |
| [10:31] <laga> juliank: mounting. | |
| [10:31] <laga> juliank: i'm booting the VM now.. | |
| [10:31] <Kano> it builds, thats not the problem | |
| [10:31] <Kano> do you want a sample iso? | |
| [10:32] <juliank> Kano: You have an ISO? | |
| [10:32] <Kano> of course | |
| [10:32] <juliank> Kano: size? | |
| [10:32] <Kano> with that kernel, but based on etch | |
| [10:32] <Kano> live-helper created | |
| [10:32] <Kano> until some other things are patched in u i will not use it | |
| [10:33] <laga> juliank: CONFIG_AUFS=m, CONFIG_AUFS_FAKE_DM=y, CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_127=y, CONFIG_AUFS_SYSAUFS=y, CONFIG_AUFS_RR_SQUASHFS=y | |
| [10:33] <laga> juliank: that's /sys/fs/aufs/config | |
| [10:35] <laga> if fails with the error message: aufs test_add:357:exe[2033]: NFS branch is not supported, try some configurations and patches included in aufs source CVS | |
| [10:35] <juliank> laga: I'm fixing it. | |
| [10:36] <laga> juliank: great. | |
| [10:36] <Kano> well you would need to patch+compile the kernel first to try | |
| [10:37] <laga> patch what? | |
| [10:37] <juliank> Kano: The Ubuntu kernel has the patches. | |
| [10:38] <Kano> juliank: fine, then it should be easy to update just lum | |
| [10:38] <Kano> a few seconds ;) | |
| [10:39] <juliank> Kano: One variable name is wrong, that's all. | |
| [10:40] <Kano> good, can update lum with ease | |
| [10:40] <Kano> scripted ;) | |
| [10:40] <juliank> laga: Do you have a build log of l-u-m? | |
| [10:41] <laga> juliank: no, but i can make one real quick :) | |
| [10:41] <juliank> laga: I'm building | |
| [10:43] <juliank> laga: try to add KSRC=$(PWD) to the top of ubuntu/fs/aufs/Makefile and build it. | |
| [10:43] <Kano> also could you enable aufs for powerpc too? | |
| [10:43] <juliank> laga: I will send a patch soon | |
| [10:44] <juliank> Kano: Soon. | |
| [10:46] <Kano> did somebody have got no framebuffer support on amd64 live cd or is it just me? | |
| [10:47] <Kano> i386 live cd has a splash | |
| [10:47] <Kano> amd64 not | |
| [10:48] <Kano> juliank: what do you think about a blacklist option for casper, i have that for kanotix | |
| [10:48] <Kano> it writes to /etc/modprobe.d/custom-blacklist | |
| [10:48] <Kano> before udev starts | |
| [10:52] <laga> juliank: i don't think it's working | |
| [10:52] <laga> same message | |
| [10:52] <juliank> laga: I need a build log. | |
| [10:54] <laga> juliank: http://www.pastebin.ca/884456 | |
| [10:55] <laga> juliank: here's the KSRC patch i added: http://www.pastebin.ca/884457 | |
| [10:57] <juliank> laga: rebuild with KSRC=$(srctree) | |
| [10:58] <laga> am i supposed to use that string literally or should i expand srctree? | |
| [10:59] <juliank> laga: as written. it's a variable | |
| [11:05] <laga> oops. that's gonna take a few minutes, just deleted the squashfs image for my diskless client. | |
| [11:12] <laga> juliank: ok. CONFIG_AUFS_LHASH_PATCH and friends were picked up properly, but i'm still getting that error message. | |
| [11:12] <laga> juliank: ok. CONFIG_AUFS_LHASH_PATCH and friends were picked up properly, but i'm still getting that error message. | |
| [11:13] <laga> juliank: i don't see a config option for the put_filp patch in sysfs | |
| [11:13] <juliank> laga: /sys/fs/aufs/config | |
| [11:14] <juliank> laga: output of grep '^.*[[:space:]]put_filp[[:space:]]vmlinux[[:space:]]EXPORT_SYMBOL' Module.symvers | |
| [11:14] <juliank> ? | |
| [11:14] <juliank> laga: sorry, typo | |
| [11:14] <laga> AUFS=m, AUFS_BRANCH_SYSAUFS=y, AUFS_RR_SQUASHFS=Y, AUFS_SEC_PERM_PATCH=y, AUFS_SPLICE_PATCH=y, AUFS_KSIZE_PATCH=y | |
| [11:15] <laga> i left out the CONFIG_ part. | |
| [11:17] <laga> juliank: what do you need grepped? | |
| [11:17] <juliank> laga: not needed. I know the problem now. | |
| [11:17] <laga> juliank: great | |
| [11:19] <juliank> laga: the patch is at http://www.pastebin.ca/884477 - | |
| [11:24] <laga> thanks, building now | |
| [11:29] <laga> juliank: awesome, it's working. | |
| [11:29] <juliank> laga: I'll send the patches to kernel-team | |
| [11:29] <laga> juliank: great | |
| [11:33] <juliank> laga: patches sent | |
| [11:33] <laga> :) | |
| [11:34] <laga> it takes 27s from power-on to having X loaded with aufs in my diskless environment | |
| [11:34] <laga> that's very nice IMHO :) | |
| [11:34] <juliank> laga: Could you try to use the rr flag for the nfs root? I need to know if this works. | |
| [11:35] <juliank> laga: in the aufs mount options | |
| [11:35] <laga> juliank: i'm not using nfs root, i'm using a squashfs root with a nfs share on top. still want it? | |
| [11:36] <juliank> laga: your nfs root is specified in dirs= or br=, then yes | |
| [11:37] <juliank> laga: s/root/share/ | |
| [11:37] <laga> ok | |
| [11:39] <juliank> I always kill my ssh proxy because I close the window ssh is running in. | |
| [11:40] <laga> juliank: well.. aufs does not fail, but of coruse the system won't boot because / is read-only :) | |
| [11:41] <juliank> laga: that's good. | |
| [11:41] <juliank> thanks | |
| [11:41] <juliank> exit | |
| [12:20] <Kano> laga: how about exporting it again via nfs and boot via network? | |
| === \sh_away is now known as \sh | |
| === gaspa_cribbio is now known as gaspa | |
| === technoant is now known as antdedyet | |
| === \sh is now known as \sh_away | |
| === \sh_away is now known as \sh | |
| [19:14] <Kano> rtg: hi, didnt you say you remove the pci ids when i report the bug? | |
| [19:32] <laga> Kano: i think if you increase the frequency of your questions it'll get fixed faster | |
| [19:36] <Kano> rtg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/185719 | |
| [19:36] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 185719 in linux "remove duplicate pci ids bcm43xx/ssb prism54/p54pci" [Medium,Triaged] | |
| [19:37] <Kano> i dislike that idea with blacklisting | |
| [19:55] <Kano> laga: best tell him that this change is needed, also you could forget the bcm43xx patch when you disable that module (same for prism54), debian disabled bcm43xx | |
| [19:56] <Kano> bye | |
| [19:59] <rtg> laga: so what does Kano think is wrong with blacklisting? | |
| [20:03] <laga> i have no clue | |
| [20:03] <laga> in that ticket, he says that it'd break if "discover" was installed | |
| === \sh is now known as \sh_away | |
| [22:25] <amitk_> rtg: what version of ALSA is in the stock kernel? | |
| [22:26] <rtg> amitk_: dunno, some mix of 1.0.15 plus. I've removed it from the kernel for -6.10 and put it in lum (1.0.16rc2) | |
| [22:28] <amitk_> rtg: aaah... | |
| [22:28] <amitk_> rtg: are we updating to a newer version of alsa in lum? | |
| [22:28] <rtg> amitk_: is that the sound of something stuck in your throat ? :) | |
| [22:29] <amitk_> hehe | |
| [22:29] <rtg> amitk_: I pulled ALSA this AM, so the version in lum is very current. | |
| [22:29] <rtg> Its actually -rc2 plus 8 or 9 more patches. | |
| [22:30] <rtg> amitk_: by the way, I'm still build testing... You mileage may vary. | |
| [22:33] <crimsun> Jaroslav (employed by Red Hat now) anticipates releasing 1.0.16 final next Tuesday. | |