| [08:11] <ubotu> New bug: #185279 in xorg-server (main) "Xorg segfaults on startup" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185279 | |
| [09:28] <bryce_> morning | |
| [09:30] <tjaalton> morning | |
| [10:06] <tjaalton> lrm uploaded.. found a minor bug 1min after upload :P | |
| [10:06] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 1 in ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 | |
| [10:06] <tjaalton> hehe | |
| [10:13] <bryce_> tjaalton: *grin* | |
| [10:13] <bryce_> tjaalton: does this include the latest fglrx? I think mvo was interested in testing if so | |
| [10:13] <bryce_> tjaalton: and latest nvidia? | |
| [10:14] <mvo> texture_from_pixmap! | |
| [10:14] <tjaalton> yes, both | |
| [10:14] <tjaalton> please test :) | |
| [10:15] <tjaalton> it also adds a convenience package fglrx-amdcccle, which should help people updating from debs created by the ati installer | |
| [10:16] <tjaalton> but that package will end up in the NEW queue, and keep this new version from entering the archive | |
| [10:16] <tjaalton> until it's accepted of course | |
| [10:18] <bryce_> http://people.ubuntu.com/~ogasawara/qa-hardy-list-archive/sort-by-package/current-buglist.html | |
| [10:23] <tjaalton> mvo: did you notice my question about bug 184212 yesterday? | |
| [10:23] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 184212 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 "package nvidia-glx-new 169.07+2.6.24.4-4.11 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/184212 | |
| [10:24] <tjaalton> mvo: could it be a bug in synaptic? | |
| [10:25] <mvo> tjaalton: no | |
| [10:25] <mvo> tjaalton: :P | |
| [10:25] <mvo> tjaalton: maybe, let me have a look, but its unlikely | |
| [10:26] <tjaalton> ok, thanks :) | |
| [10:36] <mvo> tjaalton: I don't think that its a synaptic/apt bug, the log says: | |
| [10:36] <mvo> Log started: 2008-01-18 18:14:37 | |
| [10:36] <mvo> (Reading database ... 107849 files and directories currently installed.) | |
| [10:36] <mvo> Removing nvidia-glx-new ... | |
| [10:36] <mvo> dpkg-divert: error checking `/usr/lib32/libGL.so.1': No such file or directory | |
| [10:36] <mvo> dpkg: error processing nvidia-glx-new (--purge): | |
| [10:36] <mvo> subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2 | |
| [10:37] <tjaalton> but the file is there.. | |
| [10:38] <mvo> the log is from 2008-01-18 | |
| [10:38] <mvo> the ls -l is: | |
| [10:38] <mvo> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Jan 21 15:47 /usr/lib32/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.169.07 | |
| [10:38] <mvo> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 663352 Jan 21 10:52 /usr/lib32/libGL.so.169.07 | |
| [10:38] <bryce_> mesa? | |
| [10:38] <mvo> so both files are last touched 21.01 | |
| [10:39] <tjaalton> hmm | |
| [10:39] <mvo> maybe he tinkered in between? | |
| [10:39] <tjaalton> maybe the installed some 3rd party version then | |
| [10:39] <tjaalton> I just tried removing it on amd64 and it worked just fine | |
| [10:40] <tjaalton> *they | |
| [10:40] <mvo> yeah, I was wondering if he might have used something like envy | |
| [10:43] <tjaalton> doesn't envy use the same version numbers as the official ones? the "Title" says that the package he tried to remove was 169.07+2.6.24.4-4.11 | |
| [10:43] <tjaalton> er, version | |
| [10:51] <ubotu> New bug: #185311 in xorg (main) "hardy, locking assertion failure, xorg/libsdl" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185311 | |
| [10:52] <mvo> tjaalton: I don't know :/ | |
| [11:09] <jcristau> hmm #185311 is a bit worrying | |
| [11:15] <tjaalton> jcristau: yeah, I'll forward that upstream.. | |
| [11:16] <jcristau> tjaalton: cool | |
| [11:45] <ubotu> New bug: #185321 in xfonts-utils (main) ""warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc does not exist or is not a directory" when installing a font" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185321 | |
| [12:16] <tjaalton> heh, that ^^ bug was quickly fixed | |
| [12:16] <tjaalton> present on gutsy but not hardy | |
| [12:31] <ubotu> New bug: #185332 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "can not enable nvidia driver" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185332 | |
| [13:42] <ubotu> New bug: #185266 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (restricted) "Pixel errors" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185266 | |
| [13:52] <bryce_> testing xserver with patches from q-funk and bartman... brb | |
| [14:23] <bryce_> I've finished updating, building, & testing q-funk's xserver patches | |
| [14:23] <bryce_> once we get feedback that these packages do address the issues they're supposed to, it'll be good to upload | |
| [15:16] <ubotu> New bug: #185365 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "Bad artifacts at the border of screen with ATI Radeon 7000VE at 1440x900" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185365 | |
| [16:21] <ubotu> New bug: #152304 in xserver-xorg-video-ati (main) "Xorg crashed with SIGSEGV in RADEONScreenInit()" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/152304 | |
| [16:21] <ubotu> New bug: #185338 in xorg (main) "xubuntu live cd problems on sony vaio PCG-SRX87" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185338 | |
| [18:08] <ubotu> New bug: #185121 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (main) "intel graphic i945 : high cpu usage" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185121 | |
| [18:16] <ubotu> New bug: #185433 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22 "atheros wifi broken with gutsy update [madwifi]" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185433 | |
| [18:21] <Q-FUNK> any FAQ on properly using displayconfig-gtk ? | |
| [18:23] <bryce_> Q-FUNK: I posted your patches for xserver for testing | |
| [18:23] <Q-FUNK> bryce_: yes, thanks, I noticed :) | |
| [18:24] <Q-FUNK> I'm currently trying to debug my laptop. my initial run of displayconfig-gtk messed up my default mode. | |
| [18:26] <Q-FUNK> is there any way to reset that to whatever was detected at installation time? | |
| [18:30] <tjaalton> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg | |
| [18:50] <Q-FUNK> pretty amazing the amount of damage displayconfig-gtk can accomplish | |
| [18:50] <Q-FUNK> it managed to really mess up the content of my gnome panels | |
| [18:51] <Q-FUNK> I wonder how I can selectively restore the content of the panels to defualt values | |
| [19:01] <tjaalton> they get confused without d-g | |
| [19:02] <tjaalton> as they did on my laptop occasionally | |
| [19:02] <tjaalton> *do | |
| [19:23] <Q-FUNK> tjaalton: it seems to have mostly restored-g ? | |
| [19:40] <Q-FUNK> tjaalton: erm, sorry, d-g ? | |
| [19:41] <tjaalton> some fullscreen GL games do that too | |
| [19:46] <Q-FUNK> tjaalton: found any way to restore the panel to defaults? | |
| [19:51] <tjaalton> nope.. just unlock and drag them :P | |
| [19:56] <Q-FUNK> argh | |
| [21:06] <ubotu> New bug: #185335 in xserver-xgl (universe) "The shadows of the windows do not show correctly (Intel GMA X3100) (dup-of: 175774)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185335 | |
| [22:40] <Q-FUNK> the list of modules loaded is no longer defined in xorg.conf since 1.3 ? | |
| [22:43] <Q-FUNK> somehow, dpkg-reconfigure server-xorg produced a config that reuslts in much slower performance than before the displayconfig-gtk mess | |
| [22:53] <ubotu> New bug: #15178 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (restricted) "fglrx hangs/crashes" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/15178 | |
| [22:53] <ubotu> New bug: #29032 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (main) "athl0 atheros AR5212 identified but not finding access " [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/29032 | |
| [23:26] <ubotu> New bug: #185370 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (main) "[Hardy] Compiz fails with user switcher if both users have Compiz" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/185370 | |