TMVishnu commited on
Commit
6818828
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 5a3a07c

updated readme with the eda images (#3)

Browse files

- updated readme with the eda images (a534d17cb2795cbd274d0d265908ed6d670c9c6a)

Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +27 -14
README.md CHANGED
@@ -69,26 +69,33 @@ Key features include:
69
  ## Exploratory Data Analysis
70
 
71
  ### Brand Distribution
 
 
 
72
  The treemap visualization provides a hierarchical view of market presence:
73
  - Rolex dominates with the highest representation, reflecting its market leadership
74
- - Omega and Seiko follow as major players, indicating strong market presence
75
  - Distribution reveals clear tiers in the luxury watch market
76
  - Brand representation correlates with market positioning and availability
77
 
78
- [Treemap Image]
79
 
80
  ### Feature Correlations
 
 
 
81
  The correlation matrix reveals important market dynamics:
82
  - **Size vs. Year**: Positive correlation indicating a trend toward larger case sizes in modern watches
83
  - **Price vs. Size**: Moderate correlation showing larger watches generally command higher prices
84
  - **Price vs. Year**: Notably low correlation, demonstrating that vintage watches maintain value
85
  - Each feature contributes unique information, validated by the lack of strong correlations across all variables
86
 
87
- [Correlation Matrix Image]
88
 
89
  ### Market Structure Visualizations
90
 
91
  #### UMAP Analysis
 
 
 
92
  The UMAP visualization unveils complex market positioning dynamics:
93
  - Rolex maintains a dominant central position around coordinates (0, -5), showing unparalleled brand cohesion
94
  - Omega and Breitling cluster in the left segment, indicating strategic market alignment
@@ -96,9 +103,11 @@ The UMAP visualization unveils complex market positioning dynamics:
96
  - Premium timepieces (yellower/greener hues) show tighter clustering, suggesting standardized luxury attributes
97
  - Smaller, specialized clusters indicate distinct horological collections and style categories
98
 
99
- [UMAP Image]
100
 
101
  #### t-SNE Visualization
 
 
 
102
  T-SNE analysis reveals clear market stratification with logarithmic pricing from $50 to $3.2M:
103
  - **Entry-Level Segment ($50-$4,000)**
104
  - Anchored by Seiko in the left segment
@@ -109,12 +118,13 @@ T-SNE analysis reveals clear market stratification with logarithmic pricing from
109
  - Cartier demonstrates strategic positioning between luxury and mid-range
110
  - **Ultra-Luxury Segment ($35,000-$3.2M)**
111
  - Dominated by Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet
112
- - Clear separation in right segment
113
  - Strong brand clustering indicating market alignment
114
 
115
- [t-SNE Image]
116
-
117
  #### PCA Analysis
 
 
 
118
  Principal Component Analysis provides robust market insights with 56.6% total explained variance:
119
  - **First Principal Component (31.3%)**
120
  - Predominantly captures price dynamics
@@ -125,28 +135,33 @@ Principal Component Analysis provides robust market insights with 56.6% total ex
125
  - **Brand Trajectory**
126
  - Natural progression from Seiko through Longines, Breitling, and Omega
127
  - Culminates in Rolex and Patek Philippe
128
- - Diagonal trend line serves as market positioning indicator
129
  - **Market Implications**
130
  - Successful brands occupy optimal positions along both dimensions
131
  - Clear differentiation between adjacent competitors
132
  - Evidence of strategic market positioning
133
 
134
- [PCA Image]
135
 
136
  #### Network Visualizations
137
 
 
138
  **Force-Directed Graph**
 
 
 
139
  The force-directed layout reveals natural market clustering:
140
  - Richard Mille's peripheral positioning highlights ultra-luxury strategy
141
  - Dense central clustering shows mainstream luxury brand interconnectivity
142
  - Edge patterns reveal shared market characteristics
143
  - Node proximity indicates competitive positioning
144
 
145
- [Force-Directed Graph Image]
146
 
147
  **Starburst Visualization**
 
 
 
148
  Radial architecture provides a hierarchical market perspective:
149
- - Central node represents overall market
150
  - Green nodes show brand territories with strategic spacing
151
  - Blue peripheral nodes indicate individual timepieces
152
  - Node density reveals:
@@ -155,8 +170,6 @@ Radial architecture provides a hierarchical market perspective:
155
  - Segment diversification
156
  - Balanced spacing between brand nodes indicates market segmentation
157
 
158
- [Starburst Graph Image]
159
-
160
 
161
  ## Ethics and Limitations
162
 
@@ -334,4 +347,4 @@ def get_watch_features(watch_id):
334
  ## Note
335
  - The dataset is optimized for PyTorch Geometric operations
336
  - Recommended to use GPU for large-scale operations
337
- - Consider batch processing for memory efficiency
 
69
  ## Exploratory Data Analysis
70
 
71
  ### Brand Distribution
72
+
73
+ ![Brand Distribution Treemap](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/2.png)
74
+
75
  The treemap visualization provides a hierarchical view of market presence:
76
  - Rolex dominates with the highest representation, reflecting its market leadership
77
+ - Omega and Seiko follow as major players, indicating a strong market presence
78
  - Distribution reveals clear tiers in the luxury watch market
79
  - Brand representation correlates with market positioning and availability
80
 
 
81
 
82
  ### Feature Correlations
83
+
84
+ ![Feature Correlation Matrix](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/3.png)
85
+
86
  The correlation matrix reveals important market dynamics:
87
  - **Size vs. Year**: Positive correlation indicating a trend toward larger case sizes in modern watches
88
  - **Price vs. Size**: Moderate correlation showing larger watches generally command higher prices
89
  - **Price vs. Year**: Notably low correlation, demonstrating that vintage watches maintain value
90
  - Each feature contributes unique information, validated by the lack of strong correlations across all variables
91
 
 
92
 
93
  ### Market Structure Visualizations
94
 
95
  #### UMAP Analysis
96
+
97
+ ![UMAP Visualization](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/4.png)
98
+
99
  The UMAP visualization unveils complex market positioning dynamics:
100
  - Rolex maintains a dominant central position around coordinates (0, -5), showing unparalleled brand cohesion
101
  - Omega and Breitling cluster in the left segment, indicating strategic market alignment
 
103
  - Premium timepieces (yellower/greener hues) show tighter clustering, suggesting standardized luxury attributes
104
  - Smaller, specialized clusters indicate distinct horological collections and style categories
105
 
 
106
 
107
  #### t-SNE Visualization
108
+
109
+ ![t-SNE Analysis](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/5.png)
110
+
111
  T-SNE analysis reveals clear market stratification with logarithmic pricing from $50 to $3.2M:
112
  - **Entry-Level Segment ($50-$4,000)**
113
  - Anchored by Seiko in the left segment
 
118
  - Cartier demonstrates strategic positioning between luxury and mid-range
119
  - **Ultra-Luxury Segment ($35,000-$3.2M)**
120
  - Dominated by Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet
121
+ - Clear separation in the right segment
122
  - Strong brand clustering indicating market alignment
123
 
 
 
124
  #### PCA Analysis
125
+
126
+ ![PCA Visualization](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/6.png)
127
+
128
  Principal Component Analysis provides robust market insights with 56.6% total explained variance:
129
  - **First Principal Component (31.3%)**
130
  - Predominantly captures price dynamics
 
135
  - **Brand Trajectory**
136
  - Natural progression from Seiko through Longines, Breitling, and Omega
137
  - Culminates in Rolex and Patek Philippe
138
+ - Diagonal trend line serves as a market positioning indicator
139
  - **Market Implications**
140
  - Successful brands occupy optimal positions along both dimensions
141
  - Clear differentiation between adjacent competitors
142
  - Evidence of strategic market positioning
143
 
 
144
 
145
  #### Network Visualizations
146
 
147
+
148
  **Force-Directed Graph**
149
+
150
+ ![Force-Directed Graph](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/7.png)
151
+
152
  The force-directed layout reveals natural market clustering:
153
  - Richard Mille's peripheral positioning highlights ultra-luxury strategy
154
  - Dense central clustering shows mainstream luxury brand interconnectivity
155
  - Edge patterns reveal shared market characteristics
156
  - Node proximity indicates competitive positioning
157
 
 
158
 
159
  **Starburst Visualization**
160
+
161
+ ![Starburst Graph](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/calicartels/watch-market-gnn-code/main/images/8.png)
162
+
163
  Radial architecture provides a hierarchical market perspective:
164
+ - Central node represents the overall market
165
  - Green nodes show brand territories with strategic spacing
166
  - Blue peripheral nodes indicate individual timepieces
167
  - Node density reveals:
 
170
  - Segment diversification
171
  - Balanced spacing between brand nodes indicates market segmentation
172
 
 
 
173
 
174
  ## Ethics and Limitations
175
 
 
347
  ## Note
348
  - The dataset is optimized for PyTorch Geometric operations
349
  - Recommended to use GPU for large-scale operations
350
+ - Consider batch processing for memory efficiency