SurAyush/github_issues huggingface dataset:
Issue: The speechocean762 dataset
State: closed
Author: jimbozhang

[speechocean762](https://www.openslr.org/101/) is a non-native English corpus for pronunciation scoring tasks. It is free for both commercial and non-commercial use.

I believe it will be easier to use if it could be available on Hugging Face.

Comments:
CircleCL reported two errors, but I didn't find the reason. The error message:
```
_________________ ERROR collecting tests/test_dataset_cards.py _________________
tests/test_dataset_cards.py:53: in <module>
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("dataset_name", get_changed_datasets(repo_path))
tests/test_dataset_cards.py:35: in get_changed_datasets
    diff_output = check_output(["git", "diff", "--name-only", "origin/master...HEAD"], cwd=repo_path)
../.pyenv/versions/3.6.15/lib/python3.6/subprocess.py:356: in check_output
    **kwargs).stdout
../.pyenv/versions/3.6.15/lib/python3.6/subprocess.py:438: in run
    output=stdout, stderr=stderr)
E   subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['git', 'diff', '--name-only', 'origin/master...HEAD']' returned non-zero exit status 128.

=========================== short test summary info ============================
ERROR tests/test_dataset_cards.py - subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '[...
ERROR tests/test_dataset_cards.py - subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '[...
= 4011 passed, 2357 skipped, 2 xfailed, 1 xpassed, 116 warnings, 2 errors in 284.32s (0:04:44) =

Exited with code exit status 1
```
I'm not sure if it was caused by this PR ...

I ran `tests/test_dataset_cards.py` in my local environment, and it passed:
```
(venv)$ pytest tests/test_dataset_cards.py
============================== test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.8.10, pytest-7.1.2, pluggy-1.0.0
rootdir: /home/zhangjunbo/src/datasets
plugins: forked-1.4.0, datadir-1.3.1, xdist-2.5.0
collected 1531 items

tests/test_dataset_cards.py ..... [100%]
======================= 766 passed, 765 skipped in 2.55s ========================
```


@sanchit-gandhi could you also maybe take a quick look? :-)

Thanks for your contribution, @jimbozhang. Are you still interested in adding this dataset?

We are removing the dataset scripts from this GitHub repo and moving them to the Hugging Face Hub: https://huggingface.co/datasets

We would suggest you create this dataset there. Please, feel free to tell us if you need some help.

> Thanks for your contribution, @jimbozhang. Are you still interested in adding this dataset?
> 
> We are removing the dataset scripts from this GitHub repo and moving them to the Hugging Face Hub: https://huggingface.co/datasets
> 
> We would suggest you create this dataset there. Please, feel free to tell us if you need some help.

Yes, I just planned to finish this dataset these days, and this suggestion is just in time! Thanks a lot!
I will create this dataset to Hugging Face Hub soon, maybe this week.
Issue: The "all" split breaks streaming
State: open
Author: cakiki

## Describe the bug

Not sure if this is a bug or just the way streaming works, but setting `streaming=True` did not work when setting `split="all"`

## Steps to reproduce the bug
The following works:
```python
ds = load_dataset('super_glue', 'wsc.fixed', split='all')
```
The following throws `ValueError: Bad split: all. Available splits: ['train', 'validation', 'test']`:

```python
ds = load_dataset('super_glue', 'wsc.fixed', split='all', streaming=True)
```

## Expected results
An iterator over all splits.

## Actual results
I had to do the following to achieve the desired result:
```python
from itertools import chain
ds = load_dataset('super_glue', 'wsc.fixed', streaming=True)
it =  chain.from_iterable(ds.values())
```

## Environment info
<!-- You can run the command `datasets-cli env` and copy-and-paste its output below. -->
- `datasets` version: 2.3.2
- Platform: Linux-4.15.0-176-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.31
- Python version: 3.10.5
- PyArrow version: 8.0.0
- Pandas version: 1.4.3


Comments:
Thanks for reporting @cakiki.

Yes, this is a bug. We are investigating it.

@albertvillanova Nice! Let me know if it's something I can fix my self; would love to contribtue!

@cakiki I was working on this but if you would like to contribute, go ahead. I will close my PR. ;)

For the moment I just pushed the test (to see if it impacts other tests).

It impacted the test `test_generator_based_download_and_prepare` and I have fixed this.

So that you can copy the test I implemented in my PR and then implement a fix for this issue that passes the test `tests/test_builder.py::test_builder_as_streaming_dataset`.

Hi @cakiki are you still interested in working on this? Are you planning to open a PR?

Hi @albertvillanova ! Sorry it took so long; I wanted to spend this weekend working on it.
Issue: Add info in docs about behavior of download_config.num_proc
State: closed
Author: nateraw

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**

I went to override `download_config.num_proc` and was confused about what was happening under the hood. It would be nice to have the behavior documented a bit better so folks know what's happening when they use it.

**Describe the solution you'd like**

- Add note about how the default number of workers is 16. Related code:

https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/7bcac0a6a0fc367cc068f184fa132b8de8dfa11d/src/datasets/download/download_manager.py#L299-L302

- Add note that if the number of workers is higher than the number of files to download, it won't use multiprocessing.

**Describe alternatives you've considered**

maybe it would also be nice to set `num_proc` = `num_files` when `num_proc` > `num_files`. 

**Additional context**

...


Comments:
Issue: Dataset Viewer issue for vadis/sv-ident
State: closed
Author: e-tornike

### Link

https://huggingface.co/datasets/vadis/sv-ident/viewer/default/validation

### Description

Error message when loading validation split in the viewer:

```
Status code:   400
Exception:     Status400Error
Message:       The split cache is empty.
```

### Owner

_No response_

Comments:
Thanks for reporting, @e-tornike 

Some context:
- #4527 

The dataset loads locally in streaming mode:
```python
In [2]: from datasets import load_dataset; ds = load_dataset("vadis/sv-ident", split="validation", streaming=True); item = next(iter(ds)); item
Using custom data configuration default
Out[2]: 
{'sentence': 'Im Falle von Umweltbelastungen kann selten eindeutig entschieden werden, ob Unbedenklichkeitswerte bereits erreicht oder überschritten sind, die die menschliche Gesundheit oder andere Wohlfahrts»güter« beeinträchtigen.',
 'is_variable': 0,
 'variable': [],
 'research_data': [],
 'doc_id': '51971',
 'uuid': 'ee3d7f88-1a3e-4a59-997f-e986b544a604',
 'lang': 'de'}
```

~~I have forced the refresh of the split in the preview without success.~~

I have forced the refresh of the split in the preview, and now it works.

Preview seems to work now. 

https://huggingface.co/datasets/vadis/sv-ident/viewer/default/validation

OK, thank you @e-tornike.

Apparently, after forcing the refresh, we just had to wait a little until it is effectively refreshed. 

I'm closing this issue as it was solved after forcing the refresh of the split in the preview.

Thanks a lot! :)
Issue: [data_files] Only match separated split names
State: closed
Author: lhoestq

As reported in https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/4477, the current pattern matching to infer which file goes into which split is too permissive. For example a file "contest.py" would be considered part of a test split (it contains "test") and "seqeval.py" as well (it contains "eval").

In this PR I made the pattern matching more robust by only matching split names **between separators**. The supported separators are dots, dashes, spaces and underscores.

I updated the docs accordingly.

One detail about the tests: I had to update one test because it was using `PurePath.match` as a reference for globbing, but it doesn't support the `[..]` glob pattern. Therefore I added a `mock_fs` context manager that can be used to easily define a dummy filesystem with certain files in it and run pattern matching tests. Its code comes mostly from test_streaming_download_manager.py

Close https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/4477

Comments:
_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._

I ran a script to find affected datasets (just did it on non-private non-gated). Adding "testing" and "evaluation" fixes all of of them except one:
- projecte-aina/cat_manynames:	human_annotated_testset.tsv

Let me open a PR on their repository to fix it
EDIT: pr [here](https://huggingface.co/datasets/projecte-aina/cat_manynames/discussions/2)

Feel free to merge @albertvillanova if it's all good to you :)

Thanks for the feedback @albertvillanova  I took your comments into account :)
- added numbers as supported delimiters
- used list comprehension to create the patterns list
- updated the docs and the tests according to your comments

Let me know what you think !

I ended up removing the patching and the context manager :) merging
Issue: 'sort' method sorts one column only
State: closed
Author: shachardon

The 'sort' method changes the order of one column only (the one defined by the argument 'column'), thus creating a mismatch between a sample fields. I would expect it to change the order of the samples as a whole, based on the 'column' order.

Comments:
Hi ! `ds.sort()` does sort the full dataset, not just one column:
```python
from datasets import *

ds = Dataset.from_dict({"foo": [3, 2, 1], "bar": ["c", "b", "a"]})
print(d.sort("foo").to_pandas()
#    foo bar
# 0    1   a
# 1    2   b
# 2    3   c
```

What made you think it was not the case ? Did you experience a situation where it was only sorting one column ?

Hi! thank you for your quick reply!
I wanted to sort the `cnn_dailymail` dataset by the length of the labels (num of characters). I added a new column to the dataset (`ds.add_column`) with the lengths and then sorted by this new column. Only the new length column was sorted, the reset left in their original order. 

That's unexpected, can you share the code you used to get this ?
Issue: fix(dataset_wrappers): Fixes access to fsspec.asyn in torch_iterable_dataset.py.
State: closed
Author: gugarosa

Fix #4612.

Apparently, newest `fsspec` versions do not allow access to attribute-based modules if they are not imported, such as `fsspec.async`.

Thus, @mariosasko suggested to add the missing part to the module import to allow for its access.

Comments:
_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._
Issue: Rename repo default branch to main
State: closed
Author: albertvillanova

Rename repository default branch to `main` (instead of current `master`).

Once renamed, users will have to manually update their local repos:

- [ ] Upstream:
  ```
  git branch -m master main
  git fetch upstream main
  git branch -u upstream/main main
  git remote set-head upstream -a
  ```

- [ ] Origin:
Rename fork default branch as well at: https://github.com/USERNAME/lam/settings/branches
Then:
  ```
  git fetch origin main
  git remote set-head origin -a
  ```

CC: @sgugger

Comments:
Issue: Fix time type `_arrow_to_datasets_dtype` conversion
State: closed
Author: mariosasko

Fix #4620

The issue stems from the fact that `pa.array([time_data]).type` returns `DataType(time64[unit])`, which doesn't expose the `unit` attribute, instead of `Time64Type(time64[unit])`. I believe this is a bug in PyArrow. Luckily, the both types have the same `str()`, so in this PR I call `pa.type_for_alias(str(type))` to convert them both to the `Time64Type(time64[unit])` format.

cc @severo 

Comments:
_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._
Issue: fixed duplicate calculation of spearmanr function in metrics wrapper.
State: closed
Author: benlipkin

During _compute, the scipy.stats spearmanr function was called twice, redundantly, once for calculating the score and once for calculating the p-value, under the conditional branch where return_pvalue=True. I adjusted the _compute function to execute the spearmanr function once, store the results tuple in a temporary variable, and then pass the indexed contents to the expected keys of the returned dictionary.

Comments:
Great, can open a PR in `evaluate` as well to optimize this.

Relatedly, I wanted to add a new metric, Kendall Tau (https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.stats.kendalltau.html). If I were to open a PR with the wrapper, description, citation, docstrings, readme, etc. would it make more sense to do that in the `datasets` or `evaluate` repo (or both)?

Thanks!

PR opened in`evaluate` library with same minor adjustment: https://github.com/huggingface/evaluate/pull/176 

> If I were to open a PR with the wrapper, description, citation, docstrings, readme, etc. would it make more sense to do that in the datasets or evaluate repo (or both)?

I think you could just add it to `evaluate`, we're not adding new metrics in this repo anymore
Issue: Add non-commercial licensing info for datasets for which we removed tags
State: open
Author: lhoestq

We removed several YAML tags saying that certain datasets can't be used for commercial purposes: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/4613#discussion_r911919753

Reason for this is that we only allow tags that are part of our [supported list of licenses](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/84fc3ad73c85de4eda5d152dfede7671491449cb/src/datasets/utils/resources/standard_licenses.tsv)

We should update the Licensing Information section of the concerned dataset cards, now that the non-commercial tag doesn't exist anymore for certain datasets

Comments:
yep plus `license_details` also makes sense for this IMO
Issue: Unpack `dl_manager.iter_files` to allow parallization
State: closed
Author: mariosasko

Iterate over data files outside `dl_manager.iter_files` to allow parallelization in streaming mode.

(The issue reported [here](https://discuss.huggingface.co/t/dataset-only-have-n-shard-1-when-has-multiple-shards-in-repo/19887))

PS: Another option would be to override `FilesIterable.__getitem__` to make it indexable and check for that type in `_shard_kwargs` and `n_shards,` but IMO this solution adds too much unnecessary complexity.  

Comments:
_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._

Cool thanks ! Yup it sounds like the right solution.

It looks like `_generate_tables` needs to be updated as well to fix the CI
Issue: Remove all paperswithcode_id: null
State: closed
Author: lhoestq

On the Hub there is a validation error on the `paperswithcode_id` tag when the value is `null`:

<img width="686" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42851186/177151825-93d341c5-25bd-41ab-96c2-c0b516d51c68.png">

We've been using `null` to specify that we checked on pwc but the dataset doesn't exist there.

To have the validation working again we can simply remove all the `paperswithcode_id: null`.

cc @julien-c 

Comments:
_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._

> We've been using `null` to specify that we checked on pwc but the dataset doesn't exist there.

@lhoestq maybe it's better to accept it on the Hub side then? Let me know if you want us to do it Hub-side

Yup it's maybe better to support it on the Hub side then indeed, thanks ! Closing this one
Issue: ImageFolder raises an error with parameters drop_metadata=True and drop_labels=False when metadata.jsonl is present
State: closed
Author: polinaeterna

## Describe the bug

If you pass `drop_metadata=True` and `drop_labels=False` when a `data_dir` contains at least one `matadata.jsonl` file, you will get a KeyError. This is probably not a very useful case but we shouldn't get an error anyway. Asking users to move metadata files manually outside `data_dir` or pass features manually (when there is a tool that can infer them automatically) don't look like a good idea to me either.

## Steps to reproduce the bug
### Clone an example dataset from the Hub
```bash
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/nateraw/test-imagefolder-metadata
```
### Try to load it
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("test-imagefolder-metadata", drop_metadata=True, drop_labels=False)
```
or even just
```python
ds = load_dataset("test-imagefolder-metadata", drop_metadata=True)
```
as `drop_labels=False` is a default value.

## Expected results
A DatasetDict object with two features: `"image"` and `"label"`.

## Actual results
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/debug.py", line 18, in <module>
    ds = load_dataset(
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/load.py", line 1732, in load_dataset
    builder_instance.download_and_prepare(
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/builder.py", line 704, in download_and_prepare
    self._download_and_prepare(
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/builder.py", line 1227, in _download_and_prepare
    super()._download_and_prepare(dl_manager, verify_infos, check_duplicate_keys=verify_infos)
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/builder.py", line 793, in _download_and_prepare
    self._prepare_split(split_generator, **prepare_split_kwargs)
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/builder.py", line 1218, in _prepare_split
    example = self.info.features.encode_example(record)
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/features/features.py", line 1596, in encode_example
    return encode_nested_example(self, example)
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/features/features.py", line 1165, in encode_nested_example
    {
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/features/features.py", line 1165, in <dictcomp>
    {
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/utils/py_utils.py", line 249, in zip_dict
    yield key, tuple(d[key] for d in dicts)
  File "/home/polina/workspace/datasets/src/datasets/utils/py_utils.py", line 249, in <genexpr>
    yield key, tuple(d[key] for d in dicts)
KeyError: 'label'
```

## Environment info
`datasets` master branch 

- `datasets` version: 2.3.3.dev0
- Platform: Linux-5.14.0-1042-oem-x86_64-with-glibc2.17
- Python version: 3.8.12
- PyArrow version: 6.0.1
- Pandas version: 1.4.1



Comments:
Issue: Data type is not recognized when using datetime.time
State: closed
Author: severo

## Describe the bug

Creating a dataset from a pandas dataframe with `datetime.time` format generates an error.

## Steps to reproduce the bug
```python
import pandas as pd
from datetime import time
from datasets import Dataset
df = pd.DataFrame({"feature_name": [time(1, 1, 1)]})
dataset = Dataset.from_pandas(df)
```

## Expected results

The dataset should be created.

## Actual results

```
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/slesage/hf/datasets-server/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_dataset.py", line 823, in from_pandas
    return cls(table, info=info, split=split)
  File "/home/slesage/hf/datasets-server/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/arrow_dataset.py", line 679, in __init__
    inferred_features = Features.from_arrow_schema(arrow_table.schema)
  File "/home/slesage/hf/datasets-server/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/features/features.py", line 1551, in from_arrow_schema
    obj = {field.name: generate_from_arrow_type(field.type) for field in pa_schema}
  File "/home/slesage/hf/datasets-server/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/features/features.py", line 1551, in <dictcomp>
    obj = {field.name: generate_from_arrow_type(field.type) for field in pa_schema}
  File "/home/slesage/hf/datasets-server/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/features/features.py", line 1315, in generate_from_arrow_type
    return Value(dtype=_arrow_to_datasets_dtype(pa_type))
  File "/home/slesage/hf/datasets-server/services/worker/.venv/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/features/features.py", line 83, in _arrow_to_datasets_dtype
    return f"time64[{arrow_type.unit}]"
AttributeError: 'pyarrow.lib.DataType' object has no attribute 'unit'
```

## Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.3.3.dev0
- Platform: Linux-5.13.0-1031-aws-x86_64-with-glibc2.31
- Python version: 3.9.6
- PyArrow version: 7.0.0
- Pandas version: 1.4.2

Comments:
cc @mariosasko 

Hi, thanks for reporting! I'm investigating the issue.
Issue: np arrays get turned into native lists
State: open
Author: ZhaofengWu

## Describe the bug
When attaching an `np.array` field, it seems that it automatically gets turned into a list (see below). Why is this happening? Could it lose precision? Is there a way to make sure this doesn't happen?

## Steps to reproduce the bug
```python
>>> import datasets, numpy as np
>>> dataset = datasets.load_dataset("glue", "mrpc")["validation"]
Reusing dataset glue (...)
100%|███████████████████████████████████████████████| 3/3 [00:00<00:00, 1360.61it/s]
>>> dataset2 = dataset.map(lambda x: {"tmp": np.array([0.5])}, batched=False)
100%|██████████████████████████████████████████| 408/408 [00:00<00:00, 10819.97ex/s]
>>> dataset2[0]["tmp"]
[0.5]
>>> type(dataset2[0]["tmp"])
<class 'list'>
```

## Expected results
`dataset2[0]["tmp"]` should be an `np.ndarray`.

## Actual results
It's a list.

## Environment info
<!-- You can run the command `datasets-cli env` and copy-and-paste its output below. -->
- `datasets` version: 2.3.2
- Platform: mac, though I'm pretty sure it happens on a linux machine too
- Python version: 3.9.7
- PyArrow version: 6.0.1


Comments:
If you add the line `dataset2.set_format('np')` before calling `dataset2[0]['tmp']` it should return `np.ndarray`.
I believe internally it will not store it as a list, it is only returning a list when you index it.

```
In [1]: import datasets, numpy as np
In [2]: dataset = datasets.load_dataset("glue", "mrpc")["validation"]
In [3]: dataset2 = dataset.map(lambda x: {"tmp": np.array([0.5])}, batched=False)
In [4]: dataset2[0]["tmp"]
Out[4]: [0.5]

In [5]: dataset2.set_format('np')

In [6]: dataset2[0]["tmp"]
Out[6]: array([0.5])
```

I see, thanks! Any idea if the default numpy → list conversion might cause precision loss?

I'm not super familiar with our datasets works internally, but I think your `np` array will be stored in a `pyarrow` format, and then you take a view of this as a python array. In which case, I think the precision should be preserved.