| Prompt: | |
| Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details: | |
| - CASE: Crime No. 169 of 2022 | |
| - BAIL APPLICATION: Bail Application No. 3760 of 2022 | |
| - DISTRICT: Not available | |
| --- | |
| Output: | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B) of 2023 | |
| Tirathraj Yadav aged about 29 years son of Shri Badri | |
| Prasad Yadav resident of Village - Tirchha, Police | |
| Station - Maheshganj, District – Pratapgarh | |
| .....Applicant | |
| (In Jail from 11.08.2022) | |
| Versus | |
| State of Uttar Pradesh through Additional Chief | |
| Secretary, Home, Civil Secretariat, Government of U.P., | |
| Lucknow | |
| .....Opposite Party | |
| Case Crime No. 169 of 2022 | |
| U/S 307, 308, 323, 504, 506, | |
| 427, 325 of I.P.C. | |
| Police Station - Maheshganj | |
| District – Pratapgarh | |
| Bail application No. 3760 of 2022 | |
| rejected by Additional Session | |
| Judge, Court No. 3, Pratapgarh, on | |
| 17.01.2023 | |
| FIRST APPLICATION FOR BAIL UNDER SECTION 439 OF Cr. | |
| P.C. | |
| The applicant most respectfully submits as under:- | |
| For the facts and reasons mentioned in accompanying | |
| affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this | |
| Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant the bail | |
| to the applicant in connection to Case Crime No. 169 of | |
| 2022 under Sections 307, 308, 323, 504, 506, 427, 325 | |
| of I.P.C. registered at Police Station – Maheshganj, | |
| District – Pratapgarh, in the interest of Justice. | |
| Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh ‘Bisen’) | |
| Advocate | |
| Date: .2023 Counsel for the Applicant | |
| Case Crime No. 169 of 2022 | |
| U/S 307, 308, 323, 504, 506, | |
| 427, 325 of I.P.C. | |
| Police Station - Maheshganj | |
| District – Pratapgarh | |
| Bail application No. 3760 of 2022 | |
| rejected by Additional | |
| Session Judge, Court No. 3, | |
| Pratapgarh, on 17.01.2023 | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B) of 2023 | |
| Tirathraj Yadav ...Applicant | |
| (In Jail from 11.08.2022) | |
| Versus | |
| State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party | |
| AFFIDAVIT | |
| (In support of bail application) | |
| I, Prmila Yadav aged about 22 years daughter of Shri | |
| Badri Prasad Yadav resident of Village – Tirchha Peeng, | |
| Kunda, Peeng, Pratapgarh, Sangramgarh, Police Station - | |
| Maheshganj, District – Pratapgarh, Religion – Hindu, | |
| Education – Illiterate, Occupation – Agricultural | |
| labour, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as | |
| under :- | |
| That the deponent is the sister/pairokar of the | |
| 1. | |
| applicant and duly authorized by the applicant to | |
| doing pairavi and files the aforesaid application | |
| before this Hon'ble Court and as such she is fully | |
| conversant with the facts of the case and deposed | |
| as under. The ID Proof of the deponent is enclosed | |
| and her photograph is affixed on the affidavit. | |
| That the deponent further declares that the | |
| 2. | |
| contents of the affidavit have been explained in | |
| Hindi by the counsel of the applicant to her as | |
| such he conversant with the facts of the case. | |
| That this is the first bail application before | |
| 3. | |
| this Hon'ble Court. No any other bail application | |
| pending before this Hon'ble Court or rejected by | |
| this Hon'ble Court. | |
| That brief facts of the case is that; on | |
| 4. | |
| 02.07.2022, Shri Ayodhya Prasad son of Late | |
| Gayadeen resident of Village Tirchha, Police | |
| Station - Maheshganj, District – Pratapgarh | |
| (hereinafter referred to as ‘informant’) lodged a | |
| first information report bearing Case Crime No. | |
| 169 of 2022 under Sections 307, 308, 323, 504, | |
| 506, 427 of I.P.C. at Police Station – Maheshganj, | |
| District – Pratapgarh against the applicant and | |
| his brothers of the applicant and two unknown | |
| persons with regard to an attempt to murder of the | |
| husband of the informant by firing upon him with | |
| regarding incident dated 25.06.2022. The | |
| photo/typed copy of the first information report | |
| dated 02.07.2022 is being annexed herewith as | |
| Annexure No. 01 to this affidavit. | |
| That the prosecution of the informant in nutshell | |
| 5. | |
| is that on 25.06.2022 around 07.30 hours, the | |
| applicant and his brother were in a property | |
| dispute trying to take possession of the | |
| informant’s land and protested the same, the | |
| applicant and his brothers have beaten the | |
| informant and others by lathi, danda, iron rod. | |
| That the alleged incident took place as the | |
| 6. | |
| informant on 25.06.2022 but the first information | |
| report has been lodged on 02.07.2022 i.e. more | |
| than 7 days delay, without giving any explanation | |
| with regard to the delay caused in lodging FIR, | |
| which is questionable and doubtful as the | |
| informant aforesaid FIR on basis of legal advice | |
| to harass the applicant and his family members and | |
| also for blackmailing for money. | |
| That initially the injured persons have been | |
| 7. | |
| brought for their medical at C.H.C. Kunda, | |
| Pratapgarh on 25.06.2022 around 10.30 hours, where | |
| their medical reports have been prepared and | |
| referred to S.R.N. Hospital, Prayagraj. The | |
| photo/typed copies of the medical reports dated | |
| 25.06.2022 of the injured are being annexed | |
| herewith as Annexure No. 2 to this affidavit. | |
| That thereafter, the injured have brought to | |
| 8. | |
| S.R.N. Hospital, Prayagraj on the very same day | |
| i.e. 25.06.2022, where the C.T. Scan of all three | |
| injured persons have been conducted. The photo/ | |
| typed copies of the S.T. Scan reports of the | |
| injured persons dated 25.06.2022 are being annexed | |
| herewith as Annexure No. 3 to this affidavit. | |
| That on a bare perusal of the medical reports of | |
| 9. | |
| the injured person, they seem to be forged and | |
| fabricated so for concern to the S.R.N. Hospital, | |
| Prayagraj as the 2 C.T. Scan report has been | |
| handwritten while one is computerized. | |
| That after about two months the C.T. Scan of the | |
| 10. | |
| injured person, the supplementary medical report | |
| of two injured were prepared on 06.08.2022 and | |
| about four months later the supplementary medical | |
| of the third injured was prepared on 01.10.2022 by | |
| the C.H.C., Kunda, Pratapgarh. The photo/ typed | |
| copies of the supplementary medical reports of the | |
| injured dated 06.08.2022 & 01.10.2022 are being | |
| annexed herewith as Annexure No. 4 to this | |
| affidavit. th | |
| That the statement of the informant has been | |
| 11. | |
| recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. by the | |
| concerned police on 03.07.2022, in which he almost | |
| repeated his first information report. The typed | |
| copy of the statement of the informant dated | |
| 03.07.2022 is being annexed herewith as Annexure | |
| No. 5 to this affidavit. | |
| That the statements of the injured were also | |
| 12. | |
| recorded by the concerned police on 25.07.2022 and | |
| 24.09.2022 under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., in which | |
| she almost repeated the statement of the | |
| informant. The typed copy of the statements of the | |
| injured are being annexed herewith as Annexure No. | |
| 6 to this affidavit. | |
| That the version of the injured has not | |
| 13. | |
| collaborated with the medical report as the | |
| injured sustained injuries. | |
| That the real fact of the case is that the | |
| 14. | |
| applicant and informant are residents of the same | |
| village and have a dispute regarding the land. | |
| That the informant is arrogant person and has | |
| 15. | |
| enmity with some other villagers, as a result of | |
| the same on 25.06.2022, the informant and others | |
| fought with other, and they sustained injuries but | |
| later after well plan the informant cooked a false | |
| and fabricated story to falsely implicate the | |
| applicant and his brothers in the said case crime. | |
| That here it is relevant to mention that the | |
| 16. | |
| applicant and his brothers were not in the village | |
| at the time of the incident and they were in | |
| Punjab, where they were working since long back. | |
| That the applicant and his brothers have been | |
| 17. | |
| arrested by the concerned police on 11.08.2022, | |
| when the applicant and his brothers were retruned | |
| to their village on occation of the Rakshabandhan, | |
| which has been itself clered by the arresting | |
| memo. | |
| That there is no independent witness of the case | |
| 18. | |
| crime, which also creat doubts upon the | |
| prosecution story. | |
| That it is also relevant to mention here that no | |
| 19. | |
| case is made out against the applicant as alleged | |
| in the said application and the applicant has | |
| never committed any offence as alleged. | |
| That it is relevant to mention here that the | |
| 20. | |
| applicant was falsely implicated by the informant | |
| in said case crime with the collusion of the | |
| concerned police, Applicant has no concern with | |
| the said offence. | |
| That there is no credible evidence on record, | |
| 21. | |
| which could show that the applicant is guilty or | |
| committed this crime in question and the evidence | |
| available on record, itself shows that no prima | |
| facie offence under Sections 307, 308, 323, 504, | |
| 506, 427, 325 of I.P.C. registered, in the | |
| interest of Justice. | |
| That without proper investigation of the case | |
| 22. | |
| crime, the investigating officer has submitted the | |
| charge against the applicant and his brothers | |
| bearing charge sheet No. 228 of 2022 under Section | |
| 307, 308, 323, 504, 506, 427, 325 of I.P.C. on | |
| 03.10.2022 | |
| That neither any evidence was found against the | |
| 23. | |
| applicant nor has any motive been assigned to the | |
| applicant in the present case except general | |
| allegations. | |
| That since the applicant has not committed any | |
| 24. | |
| offence as alleged but he has been falsely | |
| implicated and has no involvement in the said case | |
| as alleged in the first information report. | |
| That there is no criminal history of the applicant | |
| 25. | |
| accept present case and another case, case crime | |
| no. 27/2022 Under section 323,504,506,IPC Police | |
| station – Maheshganj, District – Pratapgarh. We | |
| have no knowledge about this aforesaid case. | |
| That the applicant moved bail application bearing | |
| 26. | |
| No. 3760 of 2022 before Additional Session Judge, | |
| Room No. 3, Pratapgarh, and his bail application | |
| has been rejected by the court concerned on | |
| 17.01.2023. The free certified copy of the order | |
| dated 17.01.2023 passed by the court concerned is | |
| being annexed as Annexure No. 7 to this affidavit. | |
| That the applicant is languishing in jail since | |
| 27. | |
| 11.08.2022 without committing any offense as | |
| alleged by the informant. | |
| That there is no possibility of the applicant’s | |
| 28. | |
| conviction because he has not committed the crime | |
| in question as alleged by the informant. | |
| That the applicant undertakes that he will not | |
| 29. | |
| misuse the liberty of bail if so granted by this | |
| Court. | |
| That there is no chance of the applicant | |
| 30. | |
| absconding or tempering with the prosecution | |
| witnesses. | |
| That the applicant is ready to furnish the | |
| 31. | |
| security and bond and also undertake that he will | |
| be never misused the liberty of bail. | |
| That in view of the above, it would be expedient | |
| 32. | |
| and necessary in the interest of justice that the | |
| applicant be enlarged on bail in connection to | |
| Case Crime No. 169 of 2022 under Sections 307, | |
| 308, 323, 504, 506, 427, 325 of I.P.C. registered | |
| at Police Station – Maheshganj, District – | |
| Pratapgarh, in the interest of Justice during the | |
| pendency of case. | |
| Lucknow | |
| Date : .2023 Deponent | |
| VERIFICATION | |
| I, the deponent, do hereby verify that the contents of | |
| para of the accompanying affidavit are true | |
| to my own knowledge and those of para | |
| are believed to true based on records and paragraph | |
| are true to legal advice. No part of its is false and | |
| nothing material has been concealed. So, help me “GOD”. | |
| Lucknow | |
| Dated: .2023 Deponent | |
| I, do hereby declare that the person making | |
| this affidavit and alleging herself to be the deponent | |
| is known to me from the perusal of papers and I am | |
| satisfied that she is the same person. | |
| Advocate | |
| Solemnly affirmed before me on at | |
| a.m./p.m. by the deponent who has been identified by | |
| Sri P. K. Singh “Bisen”, Advocate, High Court, | |
| Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. Enrolment No. 2933/2003 | |
| resident of “Narsinghpur House”, 25 Preet Vihar Colony, | |
| Raiberelly Road, Lucknow. , Mobile No. 9415288732 | |
| I, have satisfied myself by examining the deponent | |
| that she understands the contents of this affidavit, | |
| which have been read over and explained by me. | |
| OATH COMMISSIONER | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2023 | |
| Tirathraj Yadav ...Applicant | |
| (In Jail from 11.08.2022) | |
| Versus | |
| State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party | |
| INDEX | |
| Sr.No | |
| Particulars Page No. | |
| Application for bail under section | |
| 439 Cr.P.C. | |
| 1. | |
| Affidavit in support of | |
| 2. | |
| application | |
| Annexure No. 1 | |
| 3. | |
| The photo/typed copy of the first | |
| information report dated | |
| 02.07.2022 | |
| Annexure No. 2 | |
| 4. | |
| The photo/typed copies of the | |
| medical reports dated 25.06.2022 | |
| of the injured | |
| Annexure No. 3 | |
| 5. | |
| The photo/ typed copies of the | |
| S.T. Scan reports of the injured | |
| persons dated 25.06.2022 | |
| Annexure No. 4 | |
| 6. | |
| The photo/ typed copies of the | |
| supplementary medical reports of | |
| the injured dated 06.08.2022 & | |
| 01.10.2022 | |
| Annexure No. 5 | |
| 7. | |
| The typed copy of the statement of | |
| the informant dated 03.07.2022 | |
| Annexure No. 6 | |
| 8. | |
| The typed copy of the statements | |
| of the injured | |
| Annexure No. 7 | |
| 9. | |
| The free certified copy of the | |
| order dated 17.01.2023 passed by | |
| the court concerned | |
| ID proof of the deponent | |
| 10. | |
| Memo | |
| 11. | |
| Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh ‘Bisen’) | |
| Advocate | |
| Date: .2023 Counsel for the Applicant | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2023 | |
| Tirathraj Yadav Versus State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| Typed copy of Annexure No. | |
| 03-07-2022 | |
| c;ku oknh eqdnek Jh v;ks/;k çlkn iq= Lo0 x;knhu mez 60 | |
| o"kZ fuoklh xzke frj{kk Fkkuk egs'kxat tuin çrkix<+ | |
| cnfj;k¶r iwNrkN ij crk jgs gS fd ?kVuk fnukd | |
| 25@6@2022 le; djhc 7-30 cts lqcg dh gSA tehuh fookn | |
| dks ysdj xk¡o ds gh dU/kbZ ;kno rhjFk ;kno dYyw ;kno] | |
| vt; ;kno lqrx.k cæh çlkn fuå xzkå frj{kk Fkkuk egs'kxat | |
| tuin çrkix< ykBh M.Mk o yksgs dh jkM ysdj o QkoMk | |
| ysdj esjh Hkwfe ij dCtk djus yxs tc esjs yM+ds jkeujs'k | |
| us fojks/k fd;k rks mä foi{kh x.kksa us tku ls ekj Mkyus | |
| dh fu;r ls ekjs ftlls çkFkhZ dks dkQh pksV vk x;h chp | |
| cpko djus vk;h esjh cgw fouhrk dks Hkh ekjs ftlls esjh | |
| cgw dks flj ij pksV vk x;h vkSj og csgks'k gks x;hA mä | |
| foi{kh x.kksa us esjs ukrh foosd mez 16 o"kZ dks Hkh | |
| ekjk ihVk ftlls esjs ifjokjh tu dks xEHkhj pksV vk x;h vkSj | |
| çkFkhZ ds gYyk xqgkj epkus ij vkl ikl ds yksxks dks vkrs | |
| ns[kdj mä foi{khx.kksa us ek¡ cgu dh xkyh nsrs gq, | |
| njokts ij j[ks dherh ?kjsyw lkekuksa dks leku dks u"V | |
| djrs gq, iwjs ifjokj dks tku ls ekj Mkyus dh /kedh nsrs | |
| gq, ogka ls Hkkx x;s rFkk eSaus vkuu Qkuu esa Mk;y | |
| 108 ,EcqysUl dks Qksu djds cqyk;k çkFkfed mipkj gsrq | |
| lhå,pålhå egs'kxat ys vk;s- tgk¡ MkDVjks us jsQj dj fn;k | |
| gkyr [kjkc gksus ds dkj.k dqUMk lh0,p0lh0 ys x;s fdUrq | |
| mä çkFkhZ dh ifjokjh tu dh gkyr Bhd u gksus ds dkj.k | |
| Lo:i jkuh esfMdy dkyst ç;kxjkt jsQj dj fn;k tgk¡ vHkh Hkh | |
| bykt py jgk gSA ;gha esjk c;ku gSA gLo c;ku vfdr fd;k | |
| x;kA | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2023 | |
| Tirathraj Yadav Versus State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| Typed copy of Annexure No. | |
| 25-07-2022 | |
| c;ku et:ck Jherh fouhrk ;kno iRuh jkeujs'k mez 37 o"kZ | |
| fu0 xzke frjNk Fkkuk egs'kxat tuin çrkix< cnfj;k¶r | |
| iwNrkN ij crk jgh gS fd ?kVuk fnukad 25@6@2022 le; | |
| djhc 7-30 cts lqcg dh gSA tehuh fookn dks ysdj xk¡o ds | |
| gh dU/kbZ ;kno] rhjFk ;kno] dYyw ;kno vt; ;kno lqrx.k | |
| cnzh çlkn fuå xzkå frj{kk Fkkuk egs'kaxt tuin çrkix< | |
| ykBh M.Mk o yksgs dh jkM ysdj o QkoMk ysdj esjh | |
| Hkwfe ij dCtk djus yxs tc esjs ifr jkeujs'k us fojks/k fd;k | |
| rks mä foi{kh x.kksa us tku ls ekj Mkyus dh fu;r ls muij | |
| geyk dj fn;kA ftlls esjs ifr dks dkQh pksV vk x;h chp cpko | |
| djus tc eSa vk;h rks eq>dks Hkh ekjs ftlls esjs flj ij Hkh | |
| xEHkhj pksV vk x;hA mä foi{kh x.kksa us esjs iq= foosd | |
| mez 16 o"kZ dks Hkh ekjk ihVk ftlls mldks Hkh xEHkhj | |
| pksV vk x;hA eSa ekSds ij csgks'k gks x;h FkhA tc eq>s | |
| gks'k vk;k rks eSa vLirky esa csM ij FkhA esjk bZykt Lo:i | |
| jkuh vLirky ç;kxjkt esa gqvk gSAA ;gh esjk c;ku gSA gLo | |
| c;ku vafdr fd;k x;kA | |
| 24-09-2022 | |
| c;ku et:c jkeujs”k iq= Jh vk;ks/;k izlkn mez 40 o’kZ fuoklh | |
| xzke frjNk] Fkkuk egs”kxat tuin çrkix<+ us cnfj;k¶r iwN | |
| rkN ij c;ku fd;k fd lkgc fnukad 25@06@2022 dks le; djhc | |
| 07-30 cts lqcg tehuh fookn dks ysdj esjs xkao ds gh | |
| dUgS;kyky ;kno mQZ dU/kbZ rhjFkjkt ;kno —".kdqekj | |
| mQZ dYyw] vt; ;kno iq= x.k cnzh çlkn ;kno us ykBh | |
| MUMksa o QkoM+k ysdj esjh Hkwfe ij dCtk djus yxs tc | |
| eSus jksdk rks mä yksxks us eq>s xkyh xykSt djrs gq, | |
| tku ls ekj Mkyus dh uh;r ls esjs Åij tkuysok geyk dj fn;k | |
| Fkk ftlls eq>s xEHkhj pksVsa vk;h Fkh esjk gkFk Hkh | |
| VwV x;k Fkk tc chp cpko djus esjh iRuh fouhrk o yM+dk | |
| foosd vk;s rks mu yksxksa us mu ij Hkh tkuysok geyk dj | |
| fn;k vkSj mudks Hkh cqjh rjg ls ekjk ihVk Fkk ekjihV ls | |
| esjh iRuh fouhrk dks Hkh dkQh pksVsa vk;h Fkh ftlls og | |
| ekSds ij gh csgks'k gks x;h FkhA xko okyks ds chp cpko | |
| djus ij mijksä yksx tku ls ekj Mkyus dh /kedh nsrs gq, | |
| esjs njokts ij j[kh pkjikbZ o crZu rksM+ fn;s Fks vkSj ogk¡ | |
| ls pys x;s FksA ;gh esjk c;ku gSA gLo c;ku ntZ fd;k x;kA | |
| c;ku et:c foosd dqekj iq= jkeujs'k ;kno mez 16 o"kZ | |
| fuoklh xzke frjNk Fkkuk egs'kxat tuin çrkix<+ us cnfj;k¶r | |
| iwN rkN ij vius firk ds c;ku dk iw.kZ leFkZu djrs gq, crk;k | |
| fd lkgc fnukad 25@06@2022 dks le; djhc 07-30 cts lqcg | |
| tehuh fookn dks ysdj gekjs gh xkao ds dUgS;kyky ;kno | |
| mQZ dU/kbZ rhjFkjkt ;kno d`".k dqekj mQZ dYyw] | |
| vt; ;kno iq= x.k cnzh çlkn ;kno us ykBh MUMk o QkoMk | |
| ysdj gekjh tehu ij dCtk djus yxs rks esjs ikik us mudks | |
| jksdk Fkk rc mu yksxksa us esjs ikik dks xkyh xykSt djrs | |
| gq, tku ls ekj Mkyus dh uh;r ls muij tkuysok geyk dj fn;k | |
| Fkk ftlls mudks dkQh xEHkhj pksVs vk;h vkSj mudk gkFk | |
| Hkh VwV x;k Fkk tc esa o esjh eEeh fouhrk x;s rks mu | |
| yksxksa us yksxksa ij Hkh tkuysok geyk dj fn;k vkSj ge | |
| nksuksa dks Hkh cgqr ekjk ihVk Fkk ekjihV ls esjh eEeh | |
| dks o eq>dks dkQh pksVsa vk;h Fkh esjh eEeh rks | |
| ekSds ij gh csgks'k gksdj x;h FkhA xkao okyksa us vkdj | |
| chp cpko fd;k Fkk rc mijksDr yksx tku ls ekj Mkyus dh | |
| /kedh nsrs gq, esjs njokts ij j[kh pkjikbZ o crZu rksMdj | |
| ogk¡ ls pys x;s FksA ;gh esjk c;ku gSA gLo c;ku ntZ fd;k | |
| x;kA | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2023 | |
| Tirathraj Yadav Versus State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| Typed copy of Annexure No. | |
| Physical Assult | |
| E-3564 | |
| Examined Vineeta Devi 35 yers W/o Ram Naresh Yadav R/o | |
| Vill Tircha Post Peeng P/S Maheshganj, PBH at CHC Kunda | |
| at 10.30 AM on 25.06.22 | |
| B/B – Awdhesh Yadav (Brother) 9452542013 | |
| M/I | |
| Injuries – | |
| Lacerated wound Lt hap occipital over of skull | |
| 1. | |
| size above 1.0cm bleeding above just 7.0cm above to | |
| Lt eye. Adv X-ray skull AP, Lat | |
| Contused skull of Lt upper arm size 4.0 cm X 3.0 | |
| 2. | |
| cm reddish color . Adv X-ray upper arm AP, Lat | |
| Contused skull a tip of Rt shoulder size 6.cm X 4.0 | |
| 3. | |
| cm reddish color. Ad X-ray Lt shoulder AP, Lat | |
| Complaint of . Adv X-ray 2-5 | |
| 4. | |
| Opinion – | |
| All injuries kept under observation and refer to | |
| SRN Hospital, Prayagraj for further treatment and | |
| expert opinion. | |
| RTI Sd. Illegible | |
| Physical Assult | |
| E-3566 | |
| Examined Ram Naresh Yadav 40 yers S/o Ayodhya Prasad | |
| R/o Vill Tircha Post Peeng P/S Maheshganj, PBH at CHC | |
| Kunda at 10.34 AM on 25.06.22 | |
| B/B – Awdhesh Yadav (Brother-in-law) 9452542013 | |
| M/I | |
| Injuries – | |
| Swelling on Lt lover 1/3 of forearm size 8.0 cm x 4.0cm | |
| reddish color, Adv X-ray Lt forearm wrist AP, Lat | |
| Swelling occipital area of skull size 3.0 cm x 3.0 cm | |
| reddish color. Adv X-ray skull AP, Lat | |
| Opinion – | |
| All injuries kept under observation and refer to | |
| SRN Hospital, Prayagraj/District Hospital, PBH for | |
| further treatment and expert opinion. | |
| RTI Sd. Illegible | |
| Physical Assult | |
| E-3566 | |
| Examined Vivek Yadav 16 yers S/o Ram Naresh Yadav R/o | |
| Vill Tircha Post Peeng P/S Maheshganj, PBH at CHC Kunda | |
| at 10.32 AM on 25.06.22 | |
| B/B – Awdhesh Yadav (Uncle - Mama) 9452542013 | |
| M/I | |
| Injuries – | |
| Swelling on Rt Tempow occipital eNCE of skull size | |
| 1. | |
| 8.0cm x 5.0cm reddish color, Ad X-ray skull AP, Lat | |
| Swelling on occipital eNCE of skull size 4.0 cm x | |
| 2. | |
| 3.0 cm reddish color. Adv X-ray AP, Lat | |
| Complain of pain in Lt shoulder. Adv X-ray Lt | |
| 3. | |
| shoulder AP, Lat | |
| Complaint of , Adv X-ray L.S. Spine AP view | |
| 4. | |
| Opinion – | |
| All injuries kept under observation and refer to | |
| SRN Hospital, Prayagraj for further ................ | |
| treatment and expert opinion. | |
| RTI Sd. Illegible | |
| IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, | |
| LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW | |
| Criminal Misc. Case No. (B)of 2023 | |
| Tirathraj Yadav Versus State of Uttar Pradesh | |
| Typed copy of Annexure No. | |
| Department of Radiology | |
| M.L.M. medical college | |
| S.R.N. Hospital, Prayagraj | |
| Name of patient - Vivek H/O Hi S.NO. 39354/147293 Age | |
| 16 Yr. Sex M. Date 25 June 2022 | |
| CT. SCAN REPORT NCCT HEAD | |
| Scalp hematoma of maximum thickness 28 min is noted | |
| · | |
| in right fento panietal region. | |
| Linear undisplaced fracture of right parietal bone | |
| · | |
| exterding upto right occipital bone. | |
| Hemorihogic cerebral contusion in right frentol | |
| · | |
| region. | |
| Subdural hematoma of size 74x6 mm is noted in right | |
| · | |
| frontopanietol regin. | |
| For calcified qranulome of maximum size 3mm in | |
| · | |
| right panietal right frontal region. | |
| Sd. Illegible | |
| DR. Mukesh Pant | |
| MD Radiodiogra | |
| Assistant Professor | |
| Department of Radiology | |
| M.L.M. medical college | |
| S.R.N. Hospital, Prayagraj | |
| Name of patient – Ram Naresh S.NO. 39354/13990 Age 55 | |
| Yr. Sex M. Date 25.06.2022 | |
| CT. SCAN REPORT NCCT WRIST | |
| Fracture of lower end of radius. | |
| Rest visual 2nd bone normal. | |
| Sd. Illegible | |