Datasets:

RuyuanWan

/

Politeness_Disagreement

like 0

Here's my question, just to be clear, is it possible for the owner to release the picture under a lower resolution for Wikipedia and at the same time retaining the ownership of the higher resolution version? If it is, can you help me process this image?

Ok, that's no problem. Can you recommend any other users who would be able to train me?

Where should he be? As a parent of Isa-Beg?

For one phonological citation I need an uppercase "I", as in "Italy", with _serifs_ to distinguish it from lowercase L. You advised "The Classic skin uses a serifed font, if you can accept a personal solution." I'm sorry, I don't catch your meaning. Where do I find the Classic skin, what is a personal solution, and why wouldn't I accept it?

Hi Gareth. I was wondering if you could point me in the right direction for learning about building a wikipedia profile?

Thank you for your kind comment. Do you have a suggestion where the portals should be placed in the article?

I have left a comment on the Talk page under that section. You haven't said much there - is there some place where you present your view with a little more detail?

I tried a white map on <url> and a light yellow-pink on <url>. Which do you think looks better?

And <url> targets <url>. Shouldn't it go to <url>?

|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For creating an article on a relatively obscure bridge with interesting information that remains in the current article, which has become the focus of the world for all the wrong reasons, I hereby award you this oddball barnstar. Who knew all this could happen?

Hi Khoikhoi - I see you deleted a previous incarnation of a pan-Arabism article which seems to be resurfacing under variant names, and is now at <url>. This doesn't read to me like an encyclopedia article - do you have any thoughts on whether/under what criterion it should be deleted?

Agian, wishful thinking is one thing, fantasyland, now back to reality, Can you provide me ONE journal, ONE book that mentioned the term "palestinians" before 1960's??? Why not?

Yellowmonkey has told me we need another FAR delegate and recommended you for the job. Is that something you're willing to do?

You seem to have plenty of time to discuss, why don't you try to educate <url> ? Maybe he needs this more than me ?

Hey, I just noticed that you are NOT an administator, I had always assumed that you were. I wondered if you would be interested in being nominated?

Hi SE7 - There's some vandalism coming from your account, see <url>. As your past history doesn't seem to fit with this, has someoen either hacked your account or a logged-in session?

Your comment about "the additions were left intact as a courtesy" sounds a bit strange to me. Maybe you should read <url>?

I'm sure. How about we let the sockpuppet investigation let us know for certain, m'kay?

Bureaucrats require a higher level of trust than administrators. Are you actually familiar with what these tasks entail?

Cla, your partisanship is indeed fairly obvious, and pointing to one article where you've deliberately been good isn't good enough. So: if I point you to my stand against AJL, will you declare me to be non-partisan?

Thanks for adding that ref to <url>. I don't suppose your copy of Conway's says anything about the roles and fates of ''Schleswig-Holstein'' or ''Schleisen''?

Hi, you've done a lot of work on comparing FA country articles. Are you aware of any country that got special praise for the selection of images in the article?

Please don't mention other languages when we're discussing the English wikipedia! Why are you limiting yourself only to the Abrahamic concepts of ''God''?

This is a great way to deal with external links. Wondering if we should look at applying it almost universally for medical pages?

Just to let you know, you appear to have conducted the same blanking of links four times within a 24-hour period, in three different instances. Shall I report you for this, or will you kindly restore the links?

The race was advertised and billed as the 100th Indy 500. Are you saying the promoters and Indycar are liars?

If you have time could you look at <url><url> on the <url> article. I'm wondering what your thoughts are in terms whether it should go or stay?

I would like to nominate you for adminship. Would you accept now?

SuaveArt has edited his post on the Wikipedia Review and is now lying about me. Did you see the actual post there before he changed it so you can back up my cut-n-paste of what it said?

You are being very insulting on <url>. Can't you just trust the strength of your arguments, instead of insulting people who are doing their best to help improve Wikipedia?

Those of us who've been here the whole time are pretty incredulous about it also. :) We miss your fine editing style and hope you come back sometime -- keep looking in on us now and then, at least?

<url>.. it doesn't really explain what the issue was. Can you word it better?

Thanks; it just occurred to me to cite USGS maps, but this is maybe even better. Was there once an airplane crash in the vicinity, or are there maps like this for all parts of the country?

Delete, who cares. If we're going to delete every fair use image that ''has'' a sufficient rationale, why not change to German Wikipedia image policy already?

I noticed that you did some work on this article, and would like to expand it to include his recommendation (in ''Can Life Prevail'') that the UN develop hit squads to target large urban population centers (with neutron bombs as I recall), and also the discussion on the 9/11 terrorists being "superior moral human beings" for their actions. Understanding that this is a BLP, that NPOV is important, and that including secondary sources is nearly impossible as they are difficult (at best) to find, what is your feeling on this?

Why have you included the Putnam Line in the MTA infobox, when it was never operated by the MTA (excepting the Marble Hill stub, which is hardly on a par with the Hudson Line, Harlem Line, etc.)?

No more saga! Help me by keeping this page the way it is right now, alright?

You added the name Ken Taylor to the <url> page but there is no such person listed on the DOD website as having received that award. Who were you refering to?

Misrepresenting a person's actions to portray them in a bad light is one of the more common (and transparent) forms of personal attack. Is that your defense for repeatedly violating <url>?

I have looked back in my archives a year, and cannot find the issue concerned - although I certainly remember the name, your account, and the style. Can you give me the relevant link/diff, so I can refresh my memory and be best informed what action might be appropriate?

I don't understand why Hong is so reluctant to revert unilateral changes from time-to-time when he did so frequently in the past when I or someone else who supported my edits did it. What exactly is the point in me agreeing to this if someone conveniently comes along and then starts making lots of changes that I don't like but Giovanni doesn't mind?

Are u the guy on TV Forum using the same name??

I started working on missing translations of news titles inside citations, but discovered that square brackets leave an ugly residue, while round ones may not be optimal, since they clash visually with the "language" ones. Would it be acceptable to just use the English version as title?

Certainly the work is out of copyright, and some of the neighboring volumes in the series are visible on archive.org (and I don't have trouble with other books on google generally). I wonder if you know of any way, or could suggest any way, that I could get to see the downloaded pdf of Newcomb vol.6?

I'm sorry, I don't know what article you are talking about. Can you please provide the exact name?

Hi- The Magnificent Clean-keeper- I note that you recently removed a contribution I made to the <url> page, citing lack of "notability" as the reason. Iu2019m not saying you where wrong to do so (notability is an important criteria in the Wiki project), however, since the definition of "notability" is hard to pin down, could we discuss this particular instance, in greater detail, at some point?

So how come he can have all types of slandereous links on his wiki page? Don't you think being an admin you should delete them?

The benefit of a version of the sentence is that it helps clarify the differences between Lavoisier and Priestley; however, we need to be careful that we don't convey the wrong impression to the reader. How best to do this?

There was a redirect from KLPN to KTPN that was created. KLPN is the main station so why is the article called KTPN?

PS - surprised you didn't make the annoucement in your blog. Trying to fool your hordes of devoted readers?

Thanks Anon. Better now?

And "...definitions...". What do you mean by "...definitions..."?

What is unreliable about the newspaper article reports about the protests in Meliti, Lofi, etc? Are you alleging that the protests against the Greek military did not occur?

I have some made some improvements to the articles you references on the above user's talk page. Perhaps next time you would bring your concerns directly to '''me'''?

Moved. would you like me to nominate you for adminship?

Good luck with the remaining time for your nomination. BTW: under what section on <url> do you think it should appear?

Unfortunately I think <url> may also add that material; I am not familiar with Citizendum, though, but I will look at it. If Citizendum has the same policies regarding primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, then why not criticize both Wikipedia and Citizendum?

Thanks. Oh, and if you don't mind, would you please block the sockmaster?

Yes please! Buffing up ''<url>'' to at least reflect a bit better on current state-of-play-taxonomically would be good :) Any Reliable Sources call it a <url> ?

Is it ok to use words like: here are some "good" or "recommended" reliable secondary sources? Or does that have to be determined by consensus?

Greetings, and thank you for your cogent remarks at <url>. Would you be interested in voting in the straw poll <url> as well?

In my calculation if I got blocked that would only be good for me as it would clear my mind from the obsession to try and change that which seems wrong and mutable, but carries no private benefits for the reformer. Is that line of thinking truly alien to you?

Well, look again! Does ''<url>'' look like a dictionary-definition page to you?

I see you removed the review, which makes sense until at least four days from now, when it won't be mentioned on the mainpage at all. But maybe leave a note at <url> so he doesn't feel put-off?

What is the source of this image? and why do you think it's PD?

Eight more articles semi-protected. How many of these damned T & J articles are there?

Was this wholesale revert really necessary? <url> Did the edit completely fail to improve the article in any way?

Are you kidding me? Do you even bother to click on <url> to see its fleet?

How come you removed Dobby as an omitted character? Where does he appear?

You told me that you couldn't access the page in question, although I had recently changed the link to its new location. Maybe you just didn't bother to check it out?

And now you undid my declination of that one which was copyrighted. Would you ''please'' quit undoing my declinations?

I'm sorry, but I don't see the value in having different criteria for two versions of the same list, one sorted by name and one sorted by nationality. Every other list and article on space travel uses the altitude definition, why would the sub-list sorted by nationality be different?

Thanks for your response! How should we proceed ?

With all due respect, that is going to take ages. How can one create a 'Bot' to do all this for me for <url>, <url>, <url>, <url> and <url>?

I don't own any from Rousseau either, but I did know it was Grand Cru, just made a mistake! I notice above you and Stefan discussing the Langton's Classification Wines, I'm going to have a go at getting articles made for more of the exceptional level producers, I've just finished one on <url> - are you interested in working on any of them together?

I saw your notes, and will watch for any objections. If there are none, in two days, do you mind if I move that page and start the new categorization page/discussion?

Yeah, I already noticed that. Why can't people can just edit in a responsible fashion, or through ''discussion with others''?

Gah! What just happned?

Not that clear to me. What's wrong with this username?

Not sure why I got <url> from you. Had I tagged it?

Also I am willing to resume the discussion between you me and Direktor about the Legacy section. Would you be able to let me know on my talk page whether you are willing to do that in the near future?

Thanks a ton for looking that up for me. For the purposes of a citation, what are the page numbers for the whole article?

The Birr page looks good now... but, it seems a little strange to make a distinction between Abyssinia and Ethiopia, as if they were two different entities. The native name was ''ityoppya'' (Ethiopia) long before 1931; in that year, the Emperor formally requested the international community to begin using Ethiopia instead of Abyssinia, much as the Shah, around the same time, requested the use of "Iran" instead of "Persia" for his country (and it was also around this time that Siam became Thailand, I believe...) Anyway, it might make more sense for one box reading "Abyssinia / Ethiopia" in place of the two separate boxes...?

I responded to your talk page comment, encouraging you to try your hand at reworking it. Good analysis of a potential problem, so why not take a whack at it?

Great work you've been doing on this. Would you agree with me that International Political Economy should be capitalised?

i made a mistake on adding a colon on <url> and it can't be reverted. Could you help?

Evidently, I don't have enough consciousness, because I haven't the foggiest idea of what you're talking about. Could you tell me?

Afterthought: where did you get your figure of 82500 tons pa??

Damn it! Should we just revert back to the beginning of the day, since what I wrote was based on analyzing the satellite data?

Thanks for striking out the comment. Any chance of a support/oppose vote?

Perhaps these articles should be nominated for deletion. A blue belt is far from a notable BJJ player; Google returns 594 results for him, many of which might not even be the Barry Ley in question; and as for the Blaggers article: I don't see any articles on the higher-selling books you mention, why does this one deserve it?

Hi friend, I've noticed you've made some good edits over at the article. Are you a big fan of McGinley's work?

Thanks for the revert on <url>. Kinda curious how this blanking is always done by IPs that trace back to USAF installations isn't it?

Do you understand now what was wrong with your edits? What do you intend to do if unblocked?

Serouj, you didn't reply to my message and my email. One question: if the church was built after 1700 but later ruin, for instance ruined by Beria order in 30s, can it be considered Contemporary?

Sure thing, and thank you for noticing! Is the colour better now?

Where is the vandalism? Diffs?

Something's still not right with me here. Think you can perform one of those cleanups?

Do you mind if you tell me why do you add duplicate links to the article? More specifically, why do you add internal links to the See Also sections when those links are already in the article navbox?

Hi RHM22. Would you or one of your coin-loving compatriots have access to <url>?