Datasets:

RuyuanWan

/

Politeness_Disagreement

like 0

Thank you for closing out this debate. Can you please restore the history for GFDL purposes?

Hi, <url>. Do you have a suggestion as to how these article make Wikipedia better?

Thanks, was getting worried there for a moment. Have you though of asking Outriggr for a hand with <url>?

Sorry to not reply earlier regarding Deathrockeru2014I've been away. Has the situation calmed?

To me these two bits of TeX look identical after they're rendered. Can you explain the advantage of the latter format (since you've made a point of changing from the first to the second form in some articles)?

Thanks for help! One more question: similar item at this address is a painting: http://sflib1.sfpl.org:82/record=b1035824~S0 Do I use the same tags?

Thank you for catching Known for Know. How did you happen to look at the article?

So you are still sidestepping the question. Please answer it directly: please answer my question, clearly: are you saying is that you cannot use the wiki to edit cooperatively with other people on the same text, or are you saying that you can use the wiki as it was intended and edit a single text cooperatively?

When am I changing nationalities? I do remove flags when I encounter them per <url> and <url>, but changing them...?

Thanks; what should I do next time to make it easier, quicker? Just let you know?

you recently deleted <url>. can you tell me where is the AfD debate on that article?

So you see KV, just in case you missed the point, you are in the naughty chair in the naughty corner because of your own baloney, baloney that you bring yourself. Now, didn't you like that story?

I'm still scratching my head. How can this be?

I am not equally confident about this pinning one: <person>. Hector again?

Anyway why put up with all this carelessness? Why are sockpuppets and trolls being enabled?

Strikehold previously did a <url>. What do you think about adding it to the template?

While watching the contribs I noticed that the bot blanked <url> which has already been checked and is listed at <url>. Isn't that supposed to be the thing that these lists of MRGs were supposed to prevent?

Thank you for correcting the error on my user page. I have a question how does one go about archiving his talk history?

Also, in accordance with <url>, I think the Turkish Army Corps should be 3rd Corps, 4th Corps, 5th Corps, not III Corps, IV Corps, V Corps. What do you think?

I had no idea that I was such a rogue admin. Are you seriously suggesting that I need to be kicked off the project for closing a deletion debate?

The deletion review page linked above contains all the instructions for requesting a review. Why did you not read these instructions?

Yes, I'm delighted; result after a torturous few days! Um, can we add a Dali or Miro img?

Thank you for deleting the attack page I tagged. Should <url> be blocked for creating it?

A little while back, at the beginning of November, I had said that if you ever were considering adminship, that I would love to support and/or nominate you. Do you have any interest in pursuing it?

Eh. Awesome as in you are going to be more active?

Maybe I'm on crack, but in your edit summaries you're saying "MT" and "Not MT". What is MT an abbreviation for?

Thanks for explaining. Um, is that an official policy, or one just custom?

Hey poetic decay, I was planing on merging <url>, <url>, <url>, <url> and <url> together. You think you could help me with it?

I never partook in this AfD. Did you leave this on the wrong page?

Thank you! Could you protect the picture that's live too?

Hi Tim, I received the photograph from Delft but it's page looks a mess and I can't edit it. Can you, or do you know someone who can, fix it?

How did you learn Interlingua? Was it an online course like lernu, or what?

I really think that the text you have drafted at <url> is far fuller and better than the article as currently drafted. Do you have any objection to me deleting the current text (except for the infobox which I will retain) and importing you text in its entirety?

Helped them do what? Leave Israel?

Excellent, thanks! I wonder if it's worth temporarily uploading a cropped image for the main page, as 100x100 is really very small?

Thanks for identifying it as self created. What license do you release it under?

So why then does the lead stat in Christianity need a reference? Isn't it being contained in the article good enough?

The reason given on the <nowiki><person></nowiki> tag (''"Non-notable book promo"'') seems to have nothing at all to do with the article. Is this on the correct article?

Where have you put this material? On a user page somewhere?

Hi JoJan. I see that the template which listed the failed FA attempt on <url> was deleted from the talk page, and I wanted to ask if that is considered OK or not?

That's a good idea. What about army and corps HQs though?

Hey, I reverted your edits on recognition because the statements were already relayed in footnotes, which I hadn't realised when you brought it up on the talk page. Did you want to move the statements to the main text?

Your recent edits with Dab solver seem to be removing rather a lot of links, without mentioning this in the edit summary. Is this intended behaviour?

Thanks, Wareh. Have to ask, Davey: why is the Circus Maximus article on your page called <url>?

Why avoid it? Is "November 6,<br>2010" somehow a more desired rendering than "6 November<br>2010"?

The same goes for our lives. Arent we effected directly by decisions made in the White House?

<person> - sorry about that, those situations are confusing. Maybe Twinkle uses, or behaves like, rollback?

Crossover with ''30 Days of Night''?! wow....link?

Figures as much. What's wrong with it?

I asked you a question. Be educated and please respond: What does <url> has to do with <url>?

Not too sure now you come to mention it. Do i need to annihilate it?

eh, i've ALWAYS hated 50 meter pools (200 butterfly was always the BIGGEST pain in the ass) although i really did like butterfly for some reason.... never quite got that, so was it an indoor or outdoor pool????

The information itself obviously demonstrates notability. I'm sure other sources can be found, however&mdash;will you back off if other sources are added?

Thanks for the username change. Now, one last thingu2014since the account 'Dalahxe4st' already exists on Swedish Wikipedia and doesn't appear to have been taken over automatically, where should I go to take care of that?

So do I, because, inspite of my 100s of friends and supporters, I'm feeling a little beleaguered and lonely here. If I can hang on in here, can't you at least keep me company?

I note you reverted my edit on <url>, quoting "consensus". What consensus?

By the way: Do you know how to remove the spaces created below the project banner when others are placed below it? And how to make capitalisation of the rating not matter?

Lowell/Lawrence Blvd leading from Lowell to the Methuen Rotary is a device from hell as well. How many people does that short stretch of road have to kill?

This page, which you recently edited on, is constantly getting vandalized by a rival school. Could you please put an edit lock on the page?

Can you explain what you mean by ''"Randi, paranormal, Larry King etc. are all redundant redundant"''?

Hey, Rcej! ;) Would you be up to reviewing <url>?

I'm wondering why in the <url> article, you keep changing the link <url> to <url> which just redirects to <url>? Why not just leave the link to point to the intended article directy?

Hello? Whom do I speak to to become a <url>?

I tried to make some improvements to the article. What do you think?

You have given your point by point rebuttals to my reasons several times. How can you say I haven't provided my reasoning?

Just a question about the maintenance categories that FemtoBot automatically creates each month: I've noticed that the bot is frequently forced to recreate old, long-deleted monthly categories in the <person> queue, because an article got reverted to an old version for one reason or another and resulted in the old category being temporarily repopulated again. I'm just putting this forward as an idea for discussion, and am certainly not wedded to it u2014 but just to keep things simpler for everyone, I wonder what you would think about the feasibility and/or desirability of recoding the bot so that when it encounters a repopulated old maintenance category, it would retag the article to the ''current'' month instead of recreating the old one?

Thanks for the cleanup. Why did you delink the songs and Weird Al's album?

It was nominated for speedy deletion because he wasn't notable. However, if I undelete the page, will you improve the article and be able to provide decent sources to help his notability?

Good job working on the list, thanks. Could you make sure you move them from "To do" to "Done" when you finish?

I pretty much agree with <url>, except I would like to know why you modified the see also section to be a hatnote. Doesn't <url> have specific requirements for this?

I'm see about the new Version 0.7 - which stated should FINALLY be published soon... When the exact date it published? Is there anything that I can help?

Since I have not been able to get an answer to this on the project page, let me ask you directly: Did you receive Durova's "secret evidence" prior to the blocking of <url>?

It's not off topic, and I see no comment in that other discussion on the merits of WMC's Martian push -- in fact, you evaded the question. So I take it that this is a refusal to answer?

Perfect, thank you! Can you help with the phonetics of other Nordic languages?

All right, I'll bite. Is honorary membership in the Justice League not criteria enough for being listed in that category?

Why did you erase the <url> page? I was working on that article, and his notability is not disputed?

I consider <url> to be the single most important edit I have ever made. God, what is happening with The Beatles coverage on Wikipedia?

Hello Glacier109, I am contacting you because in golf they put Money not Winnings as the standard on most leaderboards used at the end of tournaments. I am just wondering why you selected the word winnings?

Hello -- I see you changed a couple of entries relating to "PALATINE, the Subject Centre for Dance, Drama and Music of the UK Higher Education Academy". I don't know (or even care) why that organisation chooses to refer to itself by capitalising the word, but (and I ask for information here) is there a policy that precludes us from respecting that choice?

That is, I would remove the inline reference to the date of the cited source, since it's given in the actual footnote. Is that OK with you?

Any thoughts on what we should do with this? Delete it as a duplicate, or copy to Commons and rename?

Hmm. Over?

Why isn't <url> included there? Is it possible there's a redirect in it's place?

These are my numbers: 7 years in Wikipedia, 6 years as an admin, 570+ articles, 4 featured articles, 1 featured list, 21 Good articles, 60 DYK's - After six years as an admin. I recently made some mistakes and I can understand if I am placed in some type of probation were I am monitored and forbidden to use my tools maybe for a year, but do I really merit the removal of my adminship?

Hi, I see you voted "support" but in the neutral section. Would you like to move that to the support section?

I found <url> whilst looking for something else. Any use to you?

Are you calling me a vandal for visiting your user page? Or am I just <url>?

The sources are ref'd in the article. Can you be more specific?

Depends; do you care deeply about image policy? Or are you an incurable masochist?

Wait a minute! I've done plenty of good edits, where did they all go?

no, not funny, unless you are a mentally challenged person. Why don't you find a better hobby where you don't post lies and offend the people of Tibet?

<url> is brand new and may need some attention. I thought you might be just the person who can help get that article at least secured against SPOD-attacks?

That's a <url>-length rant. Still, be nice and AGF, okay?

I seem to have adopted this article, since country music and dance are interests of mine. Can you recommend an easy to use bot that would help me in keeping those unwanted links out of the article?

Let me know what you'd like me to do. Are you/anyone thinking of copying over the temporary copy wholesale or in parts; destroying the edit history of either, both or neither..?

Very nice. Did you visit also Romania or not?

I'm afraid I don't know what you mean Arcayne. What comment?

Thanks for pointing out that "undiscussed moves" discussion, I hope something comes out of that - but it doesn't really look like it will. I'm not sure what I'm looking for on the discussion page for <url> about this, what am I missing?

Unless you provide a wikipedia article, with solid references od proof of notability of the term, I am going to delist it. I ave no doubts that there was a dilike of Portugals (like any other major nation), but was this word in notable circulation?

I suppose I should not have used rollback. I was aware of the problem, but you had not solved it, had you?