text
stringlengths
3
800
binary_disagreement
int64
0
1
disagreement_rate
float64
0
1
OK, then, define "bias", propose a way to quantify it, and if it's accepted by consensus, we'll apply it to ''all'' the admins on that page. Or, perhaps as a starting point, how about presenting some evidence?
1
0.5
A challenge for you! What do you think about creating a template for convoys and a list of convoys?
1
0.5
(S)he seems to have violated the spirit of 3RR <url>. How do we deal with this guy?
0
0
I'm working on improving the references on Kulwicki's article to get more reliable ones. I've also worked on improving <url>'s article toward GA. Do you know much about drag racing?
0
0
OK, same situation here :-) Marskell and I agreed on a proposal that would initially just give us some backup on the day-to-day stuff, not necessarily closes, but to work in to people who could help when we needed time off. Is it OK with you if I go ahead and propose that to Raul?
1
0.5
of <url> as those were just plain old copyedit (replacing begining of paragraph "he"'s with the name and a template fix). I'm assuming you were on the cell phone again?
0
0
its - it's - its - Sheesh ! Thanks for fixing :-) Scary, huh?
1
0.5
On the WP:Football discussion you mentioned that Man City had 150,000+ views more than the seasons article. Please could you tell me where I can find page-views for wiki articles?
1
0.5
LordAmeth-- once again, many thanks for nominating me. I have a question, though-- I noticed that the process was "scheduled to end" at 16:52 today, and we're past that now...what happens next?
0
0
It's simple Pumpie. Why don't you try to understand all parts, or write in your own language?
1
0.5
I will take out Haskett in deference to you. OK?
1
0.5
And what about <person>? Does it need fixed now too?
0
0
Why am I never asked to write a feature. Is it because "I is black"?
0
0
Sovereignty is something a thing, in this case Japan, possesses, hence the apostrophe. So what's the problem?
0
0
I've asked participants to shift the discussion away from Karchmar--that discussion isn't producing any new arguments or sources. Would you be able to contribute some thoughts as to where we might go on the topic of collaboration (i.e., tomorrow)?
0
0
Could you please clarify who the new users were exactly that you considered to be part of your 'sock farm'? Or did you not even bother to research before making such claims?
0
0
I'm pretty sure there already is a filter (possibly more than one) for this. What page got moved?
1
0.5
Indeed... The trolls just keep coming. Are you aware of content of the <url>?
0
0
You have listed it as no source but the author asserts own work. Could you please clarify this?
0
0
I'm leaving radiant/nescott to you. Can I ask you to look at my report of UBeR, please?
0
0
I'm an admin, I'd be happy to do it. You want me to do it now?
0
0
Also I noticed you made new Europe and USA maps for this and <url>. Do you think it would be good to have a world map for <url>?
0
0
Not that I know of, but it's probably time it was. Want to start a discussion somewhere?
1
0.5
Probably I would have to do quite a bit of alteration in wording. Is that O.K?
1
0.5
You're joking? <person> and <person> have no word play in spite of the same kanji?
0
0
Can I get some time to finish what I am doing without everything being deleted??
1
0.5
Do you still take photos in Jefferson Parish? If so, would it be alright if I posted some photo requests of some parish high schools?
0
0
An excellent news, indeed! I don't have time to have a look at it right now (busy with the fr FA), but do they have something on Gndevank?
1
0.5
I hope I don't upset anyone by jumping in univited, but why are self-created images any different than those found elsewhere so long as they comply with all of the non-free content criteria? Is this caveat hiding in a talk page archive somewhere?
1
0.5
What? Please speak brighted.Ps.Do you know gag?
0
0
I think it is important to note that Spirit 03 was the last gunship to be brought down and that it has not been involved in a Class A mishap since that date. Should we include that?
1
0.5
#I am still convinced the long page on "prostatitis" (a misnomer in the case of CPPS) is confusing, with too many sections and subsections, and would benefit from restructuring and the creation of separate pages for each area, or at the very least the removal of the CPPS section to its own, in depth page. You were the only editor to object to this going ahead, with this comment: "So, suggest keep this on hold for now, but in principle one might similarly split off other classification categories with this then just umbrella simple introduction." Do you still hold this view?
1
0.5
He has been indef blocked once again. I wonder how long it will take him to come back this time?
0
0
Why you undid mi edition????
0
0
When someone explicitly states that they created the image themselves, then surely GFDL is at least implied? I know i forgot to add the tag but is it really necessary to put a delete template on the image?
1
1
What for did you analyse the two ArbCom cases Piotrus-Ghirla and Eastern European dispute? Was that suggested to you by Sciurinxe6 during your off-wiki discussions for 20 days?
1
1
This talk page looked like it could use a kitten. How are you doing, is everything going OK?
1
0.5
At the Chicago house article, I think the current state of house music in its birthplace, Chicago, should be added. What do you think?
1
0.5
One question - how come the page is marked as "in dispute"? The data that is currently posted isn't in dispute, correct?
0
0
Thanks. Are you Slashdot user Anothy by any chance, or someone else?
0
0
Do I get a reference to my comment? Show me where I refuse to provide evidence backing up my changes?
0
0
Thanks for your note, Tom. As a matter of interest, how could you know who someone is based on the IP address?
1
0.5
Looks like he earned a block. He break the 3RR rule?
0
0
SE, I've briefly blocked your bot because I see it's changing embedded links to footnotes again, against <url>. Did you discuss with anyone that you were doing this, or get permission to use it?
0
0
In the <url> article, is polar mount correct? It might be improved by a bit more detail about how it works, perhaps?
0
0
Note however that <url> does not exist. Which page were you talking about in this case?
0
0
Wow that's old! What do you think of <url>?
0
0
re: <url> edit. Then let me ask you, what exactly was offensive about them?
0
0
Thank you for your answer. What are the sources for region 4 (Australia) release dates?
0
0
Hello Jeffq, I noticed you revert vandalism occasionally. Would you like me to grant your account <url> to help you revert vandalism more easily?
0
0
Your poorly written, bizarre comment makes no sense, since all of my edits in the Al Franken article conform to wikipedia's NPOV policy. What are you talking about?
0
0
At the top of the page it characterizes a guideline as ''a generally accepted standard that editors should follow'' along with a passing reference to <url>. So, I might ask, how would using 4 tildes prevent you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia?
1
0.5
That "guest" could have been an undercover Colbert staff member and the whole segment could have been staged. Otherwise, why would Colbert have taken 3 minutes out of his show to talk to someone in the audience?
1
0.5
I'm sure you're right but I can't find it in FM and haven't found it anywhere else. Could you cite sources in the article?
1
0.5
I don't understand what you are trying to ask me or suggest that I do. Can you clarify please?
0
0
And the username? Do you have any thoughts on changing it to something not involving Nazism?
1
0.5
Do you really believe that your photograph at the top of the <url> is better than my photograph which you removed? Should Wikipedia have a dedicated sunrise article that does not feature even one single decent image of a red sky?
0
0
Thanks for putting the igneous rock template on all of those articles - it looks really useful! Do you think it should have an ultramafic section added?
0
0
(after multipled edit conflicts)I checked your behaviour and your contributions myself at the time, as did numerous other admins who reviewed your edits and the block and it was subject of extensive discussion on and off-site so your suggestion that I should have checked with others is silly. You violated Wikipedia's policies and were blocked rightly for it; you've been given a second chance and instead of being productive you come here to moan about a comment I made more than six months ago, that I still stand by, and to pursue your now year-old vendetta against Nick?
0
0
Hi, I noticed you blocked '''BPRD Agent''' with no expiry time with reason: ''Vandalism-only account; see contribs and deleted contribs''. Um, isn't the Deleted Contributions only restricted to administrators?
0
0
Thanks for taking all that on....just wondering on the template if that Vancouver / North LM split vs Fraser Valley South LM split is something Elections BC cooked up; "North" and "South" just don't seem right geographically/compass-wise, it's more like "West" and East".....I'm imagine there's reason to your rhyme; dito Vancouver Island/South Coast which is a-geographical somewhat if North Island is included (the Queen Charlotte Strait region is part of the Central Coast). If those are divisions used by Elections BC I guess that's what it is, though....I can make some additions to various pages describing the changes relating to ridings they're made out of and waht areas are in/out in each case.....and since the districts were created in 2008, shouldn't hte title say that instead of 2009?
0
0
I don't have the full list online, but I do have the 07-08 AJHL record book. Are there any specific seasons or teams you are looking for?
1
0.5
Hi Fropuff. How do you convert your commutative diagrams from LaTeX to PNG?
0
0
I assume you were directing these comments to Malcolm, who was reverted by multiple people (and who blatantly violated the 3RR, as pointed out on his talk page). Correct?
1
0.5
I guess I sent you something about the <url> project and Welsh data. But you were also somehow silent on lists like gnome-i18n, weren't you?
0
0
Your obfuscation of the real issue is disengenuous; I'm rapidly losing respect for you. Is it not Wikipedia's mission to scornfully snub vandalism, which is done instantly, agressively, mercilessly?
0
0
I understand, it could be quite time consuming. Maybe we could do a collab for an article related to Thalia (once I'm finished with some work)?
0
0
Hey, what do you think if instead of naming surahs like this <url>, we add the surah number to each like : "Surah 1, Al-Fatiha". Would u agree with such page moves?
0
0
See <url>. I assume you didn't mean <url> ?
0
0
I assume you like to play '''U.S.''' billiards bottom right corner?
0
0
Can you give me a link to "We Are Defiance" ? And what do you mean by "remove" : 1) moving to the main space or 2) deleting the article ?
1
0.5
These clickable images are great! Can you make one for the 10^-6 to 10^5 range too?
0
0
I'm kind of afraid to undo <url>, mainly because I have doubt in whether the nihongo template is necessary at all. Thoughts?
1
0.5
Note them where? On their talk page, or by adding them to the list you created at ArbCom so a clerk can notify them?
0
0
I removed that second paragraph entirely, since the information is covered in the article. Do you feel that the lead should be larger?
1
0.5
Yep, I'm definitely free for the whole break. Had fun in your trip?
1
0.5
Don't worry I understand. Using igloo I assume?
0
0
Thanks for the tip. How come I sometimes come across pages where the trailing 's' is left off (or am I confusing that with the 's situation)?
1
0.5
So your argument is that as long as you follow the "rules," nothing else should matter? That if it's legal it's OK?
1
0.5
I just thought that it is nice when you are looking for RQ that you can find an algorithm that will do RQ, not QR. It's fine if we just make a section about RQ in the QR article, is that ok with you?
0
0
Alright then!?
0
0
I'm disappointed that your first response here was to revert me without discussion, and to assert a consensus that was not apparent. Before you choose to revert me again, can you ''please'' participate in the discussion at WT:RD?
1
0.5
Oh, lookee <url>: who put all the 'breakups' back with a blind revert???
0
0
Your new map is a great, less distorting, format, but it leaves out a whole lot of countries that have recently joined the alliance - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia etc among them. Can you fix this please?
0
0
Hi, Google found your start at a Bayt Nuba article. Do you want help?
1
0.5
Thanks for that, hopefully I have input this correctly. This page also seems to be flagged due to several issues, surely these can now be removed as the page has proved its worth as much as pages like <url> have?
1
0.5
I'm confused. Why did I get a user warning relating to this article?
0
0
Nice addition to the <url> article. If you have the works from which those thoughts are taken, could you add a citation(s) for them?
1
0.5
Yes, this is a nice illustration. I'd love to have a look of the code; is it possible for you to mail it to me?
0
0
Such as the redundant link to ''Roe v. Wade''? Not an improvement?
0
0
<url> apperantly we need a source...do you have one...??
0
0
Thank you, it's much appreciated. What do you think of the changes so far?
1
0.5
Take a look at: <url> Baltimore's were ordered as Recon bomber/ Great Britain - this is the GR designation??
1
0.5
I read your publication and enjoyed seeing the relationship between activeness and chance of success to become an admin. Are you planning to do a similar model for bureaucrats?
1
0.5
It's not too late to help at all - being busy has kept the work on it to a crawl. ;) I'd like to represent what you are referring to; was it on the Abom talk page or somewhere else?
0
0
I'm interested in why you reduced the columns from 5 to 2? Could you reply on my talk page please?
0
0
My problem is that the Style Guide for cities causes several topics for this small village to be repeated somewhat, especially the railroad, Gas Boom, and stockyard. Any thoughts on this article's organization?
1
0.5
Someone has moved this article to <url>. Can you please move it back?
0
0
Is there any consensus for these changes? If I've missed the discussion, I do apologise, but could you post me a link to where it occurred?
1
0.5
Are you saying that Scotty was being "hot-headed"? If so, can you please tell us what Scotty did that was "hot-headed"?
1
0.5