Datasets:

RuyuanWan

/

Politeness_Disagreement

like 0

Sigh. Was this renewed attack necessary now?

I don;t like commons because when i try to link things in the description it never works because it links only to commons. what is that?

You are correct that the science is not copyright, but the purpose of the cite is <url>. If I want to check your equation, where should I look?

Thanks! :) So we're allowed to do multiple revdels at a time now?

Nice work so far on your rewrite of "The One After the Superbowl". Are you planning on including info about the Diet Coke fiasco?

Thanks for telling me. Do you just perform the rename, and I then re-create the account to take it for myself?

If it's alright with you, I'm next going to start from 1930 and work back towards where you are, since I'm particularly interested in the Lang era. Is that okay?

Thanks for the detailed reply. Can a random admin who notices the image with the speedy tag do something useful to fix the situation?

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my page. How did you catch it so fast?

Sure, I'll have a look at it. It looks like it needs a bit of a copyedit though, hope you don't mind?

That's reason to expand the treatment to other painters, not to blank this one. And you didn't think that there would be more articles on van Gogh paintings?

Why, precisely? And what separates the etiquette of your area of society from our "conventional etiquette" speed-developed on the Internet?

No worries found it... but yeah... We need a new Foo's pic... Does Flickr have fair use licenses?

And what did I do wrong???????????????????????

my edit was described as ''(Reverted 1 edit by 64.53.137.232 (talk): Rv. (TW))'' and I didn't give the guy a warning or anything so how would anyone think I was calling him a vandal?

You come across as a contributor who possess great depth. Are you a history professor/ student?

See my comments on the article's talk page, which is on my watchlist by the way. Be bold?

Where do you suggest that I post the citation? In the "USNA" section or the "Hispanic alumni section"?

I see you deleted the Shayla LaVeaux article, citing copyright problems. I'd like to see if I can't clean it up... is there any way I can see the deleted article?

pls see my comments on your revert on the talk page. Perhaps you'll consider undoing my revert?

I accept your point and won't classify as Military of Japan. What would be a better desciption for these historical Japanese soldiers?

How about this for a novel solution? The next time a banned editor posts something to your page, why not delete it yourself with an edit summary of "Sorry, I'm topic-banned from discussing this"?

Thanks for that - very nicely commented code (rare to see)! It seems to need a table to be set up - do you have the schema or sql for that handy?

So why didn't you just look through the source, to see if there was a number there? Or why didn't you simply ask the editor on their talk page?

There hasn't been much progress made in the last three days. Is anyone interested in responding?

He's still got the youtube link on there even after your reversion. How does once vs. 25 times or so make any difference?

Thanks for the correction but I am still working on the table. Could you hold off for a bit so our edits don't cross?

You seemed, to me, to be addressing all of us who were opposed to your merger. Do you know a different meaning for "oddwater" other than "urine"?

Just got around to this on <url>. Do you still need help or is this sorted?

I know there is some discussion at <url> regarding primary topics so I'm unsure if performing this edit would be an ok move. Thoughts?

... but when you do things like <url>, I start distancing myself. What made you come to that decision if you did differently on the <url> and <url>?

It looks like you tried to file a checkuser case but you never created the subpage. Do you need some help?

I'm attempting to be incisive, and the articles integrity hasn't been disrupted. Therefore i see no reason why you chose to comment unless you felt that ive wiped out important information?

If the deleted image only has a single character then no need to restore. Would you be against adding an image illustrating the 4 protagonist dinosaurs?

Thanks for the articles on South African cricket teams - I was planning to do them myself but I really appreciate that you've done them. By the way, where did you find the information on what regions the teams represent?

I found this talk page (and <url>) while deleting the user pages that you requested. Would you like to have them deleted as well?

Really? Why?

I think this deserves its own article, as opposed to being in the centrifugal one. Do you have any good sources that describe how it works?

Denied. I take it then that you deny responsiblity for an account (which I'll not name here) created just four minutes after you made that edit?

Isn't this section "Vatican Responses"? How come the wordings are not fact-based but seem to have devolved into media perceptions of the Vatican responses?

Sorry, I dont quite remember what we were talking about. Can you tell me what you were/are confused about?

I tagged the most recent article. Aren't there guidelines for public history in your state?

Hello Jennica, I noticed you revert vandalsm occasionally. Would you like me to grant your account <url> to help you revert vandalism more easily?

In case you didn't realize, one of the first things they states on that article was that if the information on a main or major character becomes long, then it warrants its own article. So, if that the case, then why did you merge <url>, since his article is long and he is the main character on <url>?

Hi, You stated the editor is inactive, yet the editor is stalking me through MY CONTRIBUTIONS and reverting my entries and the editor left a message on the top of my TALK page, so why would you not block them ? You didn't even give them a warning ?

See my answer in <url>. Is there some problem?

|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I've started the Badfinger wiki amd I need help. You seem to know a lot about them, could you please help out?

I note that you've edited since this was brought up here. Could you please respond?

I've removed my remark. But if somebody puts words in another's mouth, and that second person states that is not what he meant, and the first person responds that no, that ''is'' what the second person meant, well, wouldn't you say that's a little weird?

The new features of Hotcat are excellent: whom do I thank for this? :-) Are you still its maintainer?

My job. Do you have any specific points to address?

Jeez, Joe, and I was going to suggest you hang around Andrea's to make sure he doesn't do himself a disservice... What is this? Getting blocked is the new cool?

I was not trying to sound rude earlier. Haunted Angel which of my seven reasons had you decided were evidence of his sock puppetry?

Would you email me with any points/incidents you especially want me to be aware of? Do you think Jimbo will be willing to pass this to the arbitration committee?

He's gone. Was it something I said?

Thanks for adding the WSL windmill picture. I see you are in Belgium, any chance of adding more pictures to the various lists?

I would be willing to move this article to the incubator so that it can be worked on (I agree it wouldn't be an A7 today), though if it's to be made into a real article it needs to be done with someone with no conflict of interest regarding the subject, as creating articles for things you own is highly discouraged. If I undelete it to the incubator would you agree to let it go and leave it up to other users without a conflict of interest?

Hi old friend! Would you mind unprotecting my user/talkpages please?

Are you saying that Racepacket attempted to contact Laura's employer? When and where did this happen?

p.s. I'd be right that you're a supporter of corporal punishment, I presume?

Regarding <url>, the alumni should be alphabetized and Tom DeLonge did go there. Why would you undo my edit?

While browsing wikipedia for missing pages to write i saw it on your things to do list. Assuming he's a poet, do you mean <url>?

Thanks, the logo looks much better now. You wouldn't have a logo for the two predessesor clubs by any chance?

To ''Arbcom''? Aren't we being a bit dramatic here when other forms of dispute resolution have not been tried?

I'd be glad to help, if you like. How should we divide it, by section or by criteria?

Thank you. Was it anything in particular?

If there was another film that had the same title and wasn't disambiguated on the 1961 film's page or the short story's page, then I cannot be held responsible. How was I to know that there was another film?

<url>. Congrats, or should I say good luck?

Although Singapore does not use Traditional Chinese, I still think we should at least add Traditional Chinese titles for shows not made by Mediacorp, and bought from overseas (mainly Hong Kong) TV stations. What do you think?

Was it you who deleted the section in Victor Garber's article about his sexuality and his partner? If yes, what was the reason?

<url> is, in reality, a good guy, and quite reasonable. I'm confident that he'd be happy to help work with you on any image problems -- remember how you and I started out editing together?

That's OK &mdash; my pleasure. Have you tried the IMDb?

... then you have to at least meet me half-way. For instance, "''<url>'' described the episode as displaying "an exhilarating flair for rapid change of comic gear" and made commented positively on the scene." Can you see the problem here?

I don't see any of that in his deletion log. Would you please find out which one it was as evidence so you're not blindly accusing an admin of deleting something they didn't delete?

I Mean hes been really sucessful why not???

This is starting to almost feel like harassment. Perhaps we should take this to a mediation committee?

Thanks for your work in cleaning up <url> (which is now finished, but for a few hard cases which likely will require the writing of articles to conform to those links). Would you like to collaborate on another section of this list?

You beat me to the punch with the archaeological discovery.<url>. I'm curious, do you know if any Scottish newspapers reported it?

All is good here, hopefully the same with yourself. How many English first-class cricketer you think we've got to get done in total?

How are these inconsistent with the traditional account of the origins of the Torah involving redactions as late as Ezra? Why do we need bizarre hypotheses about documents being interwoven that are contrary to all known examples of how books are written?

Is there any point to the quotation that's not served equally by the link on its own? Other than the obvious (which I'd like to think you're above), which is trolling the student pollies?

...I have no clue what you're asking me about or seeking me to do. And what does "RTL wikies" mean?

I have posted a question at <url> which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it?

And why exactly am I looking at your monobook? And why did you substitute your user links onto here?

Sorry... haven't unblocked many people before. Is it ok now?

Why can't we do like IMDB and have multiple ratings? Is it that simple, or am I crazy?

ww - hey, good work on the new pages that you've added in the last couple of days (5-6 isn't it?). I add them to <url> when I notice them, but I'm not sure that I catch them all; I don't suppose you could add them to the list on creation?

thanks for your input, it was such a pleasure interacting with you, now that the overlapping projects assessment are done, we need never interact again. projects opting out of policy, how charming, some projects are more equal than others, can i take a vote on SI project opting out of copyright vios?

Converting <url> to a redirect without preserving either the information or sources, & without discussion was ill-advised. A bit more care in future?

I wish I could find a better one but I don't think I know where one is I think the composition needs more information. Can you do that?

I'm sorry, but I'm unlikely to have time to help. Maybe try <url>?

just look out or you'll regret!OK, stop here, go to bed. Have U done "Tourism Report" yet?

At first I couldn't see it, but now that I've taken a closer look I see what you mean. Now, I wonder, who was the first most decorated PR soldier in WW II?

We need a visual of some kind. How's the state of your right-brain today?

It's not my job to add the "Bronze Age" material in the article on <url>, so please refrain from removing existing material just because you haven't made any effort to add the "Bronze Age" content. OK ?

Gee, thanks. But shouldn't it be a barnstar for '''''bad''''' humor, or maybe for the humor "phlegm"?

You're still missing the point. How do the two sites meet <url>?

Maybe you should consider a user name change? To, say, "Sarah 'The Hammer' Ewart"?

Okay. What, exactly, can I do about that?

Yeah, thank you so much. Can anyone do that or only admins?