Datasets:

RuyuanWan

/

Politeness_Disagreement

like 0

Ok, many thanks for that. I'm not sure how reliable that 2nd group are - it has <url> but what about all his dinner-guests?

The admin says he thinks it should be renamed, but someone else is trying to pull the "but it happened in the same area nonsense". Was I clear enough in explaining where the pictures are listed?

Hayashi and Spreng Explicitly claim that the Inuktitut data is completely compable to Greenlandic. When you write Mahieu & Tersis you mean Trondhjem right?

Please answer Bishonen question to you. When were you invited to comment on UC related subjects?

Aberayron, certainly. But Aberaryron ?

Please discuss general principles on <url>. Do you think there should be a controversies page, or do you think the controversies should be integrated into the mainline texts of the various Giuliani articles?

Seriously? Seriously?

Do you really think it is necessary to do that? Could you not simply take my advice on board?

Quite welcome. Doesn't Huggle use rollback when available and applicable (last several edits were by the same user)?

So....what's up with this article? Is it a joke?

Hi, I can run a newsletter bot for you, WesleyDodds. Whatcha need me to deliver?

Would you mind doing the same for <url>?

I know what the band Rush is. I'm just wondering if you were joking or didn't know the user was referring to Rush Limbaugh?

Weren't you involved with <url> (aka "wikibugs") at some point? Is it dead?

Your <url> give your first edit as on April 9, 2011. Do you have any other account you have not disclosed yet?

I have also put speedy delete tags on <url> and <url>. Was there any particular reason to move your user/user talk pages to that name, and back again?

Just move <url> to <url>. And shouldn't the clean-up parameter be added to <url> also to make it work?

Your comments have been extremely helpful. I'd like to put this FAC to bed soon; is there any chance that you might be able to finish off your review of the article this weekend?

So, Pasquale, you're not interested? Have you ever read <url> article?

I'm not finding the name change request at <url>, nor does there appear to be such an edit under the "Rogerboas" account name. Did you posti t while logged out, perhaps?

Why did you remove the pollution references on <url>. Do you have a source which refutes this claim?

No, I have not read it, as it is of no interest to me or this encyclopedia. Are you claiming that the references make the blog post a reliable source, or why are we still discussing this?

Currently, <url> is a subcategory of <url>. What would you suggest doing about this?

Sounds interesting. Could people keep me in the loop as well?

Re <url>: I reverted once. Shouldn't I get a cut of the proceeds?

While editing the COIN page regarding Ciplex, I accidently broke your sig. Since I don't want any more flame, could you please fix it?

Oops, I also just realized that I probably shouldn't delete this image because I added a comment on the talk page. Is this correct?

Due to your edits to this template, <url> is now required on all transclusions. Are you running a bot to clean this up?

(Constantine and Leo are English, not Latin names.) Why don't you answer my question about Constantine the Great?

I aggree... river name then "River". Do you think that since it's a list of rivers in China we should use the Chinese name and the international norm name too?

I notice that your userpage announces that this is an alternate account and won't get involved in policy. Did you always have that attitude, or is it since December last year?

you have been following me around all week reverting my edits. what did i do to you?

Thanks for helping to source alternative names...helps quash everyone including his/her favorite. I don't have that ref handy--does "unofficial" mean "lots of people call it that but WMATA doesn't", or "it's often called that as a nickname even in WMATA or other formal documents"?

And if you use Coulson you would probably have to say "According to Coulson...". Have you read <url> yet?

Per <url> we should summarize the article briefly in the lede. I didn't see anything about higher dimensions in the <url> body so should it be removed from the lede or should the body be expanded?

Do we have an automated-edit-using editor who's decided to just stick these in for completeness' sake? Did I miss all this?

Turkish boys are circumcised they are Muslim's. Why did you delete it?

Please don't talk like a robot. What harm did it do?

Indian cultural imperialism is rampant this am - what nxt? we have had the mongolians and indians - maybe the astragoths next?

I see that you are becoming a little bit paranoid. Do i need to do a check user for you ?

I'm sorry, but I don't see what you're talking about. Could you be more specific?

No-one's saying you can't edit anything, but what we are saying is that introducing grammatically incorrect phrases, POV, weasel words and things discussed and discounted in the numerous PRs and FLCs this article went through is inappropriate. Buc, stop it please, I'm getting tired of this, why not work on being constructive to articles that aren't at featured status?

I see you have been creating lots of articles on bus stations on the <url>. Considering how little information there is (and is likely to be) for these stations, would it not be better to have them all on one article?

Hey Alex... I just emailed a United Kingdom professor, intending to email a University of Kentucky professor. If he expresses interest, are you the person he should talk to?

Good! By the way, what do you think of merging the recurring animals in <url> to <url> and then getting rid of the rest?

I posted here rather than to Jon's page because I don't want to embarrass the students; I know Jon watchlists your page and I am sure other NRG editors do too. Anyway, what do you think?

I was doing some minor editing on this, and noticed that the date of death in the intro and infobox don't match. Could you take a look at this and see which is correct?

He's now been asked if he is ''the'' Alex Salmond and if not he should make that known. Imagine if he was?

The specific claim of Boyer's that you included and I deleted was that "cauchy based infinitesimals on limits". Did you see anybody else saying this?

This was supposed to have been moved to <url> per the CFD. Why wasn't it moved?

Why did you block tanner1996 that is me I was going to choose Nascar1996 but someone else is using that name??????????

I'll add that to the others. Will that work?

I had to revert another one <url>. How about that protection?

Hello Roman! If you have time, could you add a <url> infobox (with census data) for <url>?

I've just seen your message on my Talk page. Why do you want the disambiguation page to be the one that doesn't say "disambiguation"?

I've just reinstated the perfectly valid redirect to this. I seem to remember there was some issue years ago with a rock group of the same name, but don't you look at these things before you delete?

Blocking people who disagree with your edits is a very zionist approach. Why don't you try instead to justify why your material should stay in the lead?

Read beyond the obvious. What is that essay saying when you remove all referances to users under blocks, bans or other sanctions?

Why can't you just remove the offending phase and repost your comment? This resolves the situation, does it not?

Regarding our WikiProject discussion about airport naming, I am unsure about Wiki etiquette - should I edit your sandbox with links indicating the common name (i.e. airport even though it's an aerodrome) or should I list them on my own talk page?

Hey thanks for reassessing the <url> article to B class. So what's need to be done to make it GA?

The <url> has a request (header "<url>") left a few hours ago by someone who has pictures of signs in China but can't read them. Would you please be willing to help?

????????????

give me your personal opinion, is an article with citations and written in a mature manner, about shart, ever going to remain without being deleted? or will i just waste my time if i make it?

Hello Iris. Would you add Straka's signing with a Czech team into, to his page?

BTW, I translated the page to the best of my ability (my Spanish only carried me so far). Do you speak Portuguese?

Thank you very much for your kind comments but I don't recall if or when I made these contributions. Are you sure it was me?

Hello. Since you have contributed to <url> in the past, could you spare a minute to discuss the fate of <url>?

Thank you for your time, but, perhaps; If I give you the iformation and images and such for Lord Strachan, could you maybe make it? It shouldn't be that hard to find info, or images, but I already have them, so if I give you this stuff, perhaps could you do it?

<url> and <url> seem to be two articles on the same subject. What's the point of having separate articles?

ED... They have drugs to fix that now, don't they?

You mean the links that are being edit warred over? I can, but first can you explain what the edit war was all about and what the point of the links are?

Either <url> is really misinterpreting the guidelines or I missed out on something. Care to shed light here?

Thank you. So what did I do to earn the tea?

Firstly, why do you assume I don't care about the content, and secondly, what chance have you given anyone to voice a dissenting opinion? Correct me if I am wrong, but you don't seem to have asked if anyone had a problem with the merge, did you?

There may not be a lot of situations like this, but there will definitely be some. I was wondering if there is any kind of invisible comment that can be added to the article in these situations so that the report doesn't include it, or if you have any other thoughts about how it might be possible to handle this situation?

I am reluctant to mention this, but having your paragraph in bold on <url> seems to me to be a bit self-promotional and unfair to the other members. Is there any chance that I might be able to persuade you to voluntarily unbold it?

Thanks for the ce's on Attachment therapy. Are you kindly undertaking the second opinion?

Please see <url>. Could you help with the list on the talk page?

Hi. The font-size for the links in this template may be on the small side, but it seems to be floating okay -- or do I need to check more places where it's used?

Started, shall we post on the <url> page and ask for others to collaborate. Is that a good use of the WikiProject?

Looks good! Did you check out <url>?

Respectfully, you've replied to the message below mine a day ago now. Could you provide guidance for my request please?

<url> - I removed a see-also to a link placed by a COI-editor pointing to a topic about himself, which duplicated an existing link on the same topic. Exactly what is <em>your</em> reason for the template on my user page?

Wikipedia is anything '''but''' formal, many characters real or fictional don't get referred by their full names all the time. Besides, who else on wikipedia thinks "OOO" is awkward?

Done. I may have missed a few links when copying them across, so could you please look through it just in case?

I certainly think more things should be deleted from enwiki, but TheCommunity(tm) is fickle. Are you complaining about something ''I'' did?

The only way I have a naval website is that I am one of the people actively working to make sure Wikipedia has good coverage of naval topics here. Which website do you think I run?

MONGO, today you speedied this article as a non notable character. Surely you know the non notable speedy criteria is for real people, not characters?

He has requested unblock, states that he has edited from a school IP and that may be the reason for it. Who is he supposed to be a sock of, and what's the evidence?

Hey, I could really use your skill on WikiProject Cities. Do you have time to assist?

One more thing, you have a fellow Budgie insisting a losing appearance in an FA Cup semi is an "Honour" for your club. I guess it's because you haven't won much lately, but really, a losing semi-finalist isn't an honour in the real sense of the word, is it?

I'm very impressed with your work getting Niagara County's NRHP list filled out with pictures and articles! Did you take most of those new pictures yourself?

I'm usually polite, but this one seemed to need a slap across the face. It's ... words escape me .. mindboggling... jaw-dropping ... ?

As another aside, they are mostly Germans. What's up with that?

'''<url>'''Please also answer the questions at paragraph '''<url>''' above, as you are looking like a classic bully admin who abuses his powers and should be stripped of that role. Is there any review process in wikipedia, for proposing that you be stripped of your admin powers for bullyism?

..is indeed a sick and boring life. Where do I sign up to give you your celebratory sexin'?

Truly Kafkaesque. Did GoRight try to have it taken down?

I put both in the first sentence, to show a range. Is that OK?

No, of course I never did. So why do you keep writing about "scorning others's sensitivities" when such a thing was never suggested?