input
stringlengths 797
1.79k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 41
41
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's a shame that you have no idea what these Troopers had to deal with on scene, yet you are passing judgement from the safety of your computer. Must be nice. Guy attempts to stab them, a taser was attempted, and he had to be shot. A knife is a deadly weapon, and should be treated as such. Go try doing what they do.... Oh wait, you probably couldn't.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-bb6572a7bcae484e8ba68155240cc160 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: For those who have taught high school government, there are plenty of minefields to navigate. The teacher made a mistake but it appears Larson thought it was compounded by the pinata representing Trump and not also Clinton. Would he have been so concerned with an image of just Clinton?
The student response defending free speech is perfect for Larson who also defends free speech. Are we being politically correct to see this event as offensive?
Imagine trying to teach government in this political climate. I would worry that showing some of Trump's comments about schlongs and male sexual prowess would get me in hot water. Parents will look for any excuse to attack teachers. Gone are the days when teaches had the respect they once garnered.
Larson is no friend of teachers and the same with many of his followers. While teacher Tyler Nice will learn a lesson from this, the students will get the lesson that freedom comes with a price.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-30faf1eafa50424abd830f3c6d68bac4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: If I could textually give you a middle finger, I would :-)
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-5bad6df47ca4458590b9f93746c053b9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I stopped by the place today, just to see what the fuss was all about. Sunday evening, place is of course closed, but... the menu actually looks good, the space looks really well planned out, and I'm looking forward to judging the place on the food, rather than WWeek-sponsored controversy.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-1822cad075634a53aec200af3e997957 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Shame that innocent farmers that supply Oregon and Nevada food source are so quickly called criminals... everyone needs to carry a gun for protection it's a Constitutional right, and I carry regularly too as there is too much crime, and the silly states that are accepting refugees will find that out soon. As Florida had. Say what you may, I had my say. Silly liberals.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-ae54fc824b1945a4ad1f8611ee76c4d2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I advocated his actual suicide, motleycrew. If someone were to assassinate him his groupies would start a religion to deify him. His suicide would be much more poetic.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-7b4cc863085f459886ac50315f0b1897 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's time for you to leave this public forum, Craig. I can't even imagine what living in your world is like; filled with hate of your fellow man. There's a difference between opposing opposite of political ideology and then there's just pure hate. This type of public forum isn't meant for someone like you. Peddle your self-righteous garbage elsewhere.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-e38b2f66de8c425faaa6c468abd9c542 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Considering the untold suffering the theft of these funds have caused children across the world, the sentence seems rather lenient. The May Smith charitable trust helps impoverished children.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-328e773b7e044f579ac32bb3e1696729 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Because men don't belong in the ladies room. Criminals don't follow laws so the only ones that are denied guns and ammo are law abiding citizens, I hope I've answered your question for you. You are not a very nice individual and are using this horrific act to push an agenda, shame shame on you.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-b5fac5b363714e879d371466f6e0f811 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: These oil companies are trying to be enemies of the very state that gave them untold riches. They aren't going broke because of Alaska. You'd think the bootlickers would figure that out. If these oil companies want our oil, then they'd best be our friends, like they used to say we were. We are an Owner State, not a Company State. If you wanna help us out here, since we've been real nice to you, Oilies, I'd suggest to ease up on the rip-offs.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-4cf65154e0954f2585d4dd4d0a67ef77 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: She sounds like she could be a welcome addition to that group; she's smart, she is detail-oriented and energetic enough to actually research issues, and her training should come in handy. I suppose she has faults, which Paul Conte has enumerated, but she is only one of many on that group. Her weakness should be balanced by others' strengths.
On the other hand, I find it completely reprehensible that Clair Syrett voted for her based primarily on the configuration of the organs between her legs; and even more so that Syrett didn't even know who the other members on the commission were.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-a4f9c492e2cf4267a6da0c4a71bb4d65 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Great, here's Ernie the racist troll who doesn't live here and just wants to foment hate and discontent. Spent a lot of time in the bush he says, working on all those wasteful government sponsored projects to earn his way.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-e25033a02d9f4a91a5bde310356fbed6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Fingernails growing on a dead man. We are not the kind of people who build bridges or much of anything else. The people that were are dead or dying. Looking at similar big projects across the nation like the New San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge and Boston's Big Dig fiascos, I seriously doubt the engineering and construction skills necessary for such a project could be found in the United States anyway.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-cdcea55f28c7433da9edcd2ef46ee6b9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: This kind of thinking is why the 30 year old Saudi Prince glutted the oil market, they knew fools would bankrupt oil producers so Saudi can control the oil market they have!
Stop attacking the money men like musselman who helps keep Alaska alive, look at the last lease sales on the North Slope, if it was not for Caelus and Armstrong Alaska would be in real bad shape, the majors would have to shut down the trans Alaska pipeline.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-1089e52e62bd4478a8ad76e1f7549178 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Mr. Johns should contact those ambulance chasers Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton for assistance. Ridiculous waste of tax dollars.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-16bfd3783161408f968171d09dc41492 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Here's what's going to happen - Republicans will lose the White House. That's a given. If you haven't yet accepted that fact then kudos to the echo-chamber that continues to feed you false information. They're certainly succeeding in doing their job.
Republicans will also lose the senate. Democrats only need five seats to retake the majority. Given that Trump or Cruz is a disaster for the down ticket races PLUS Republican senators refusing to do their job, Democrats will have an easy time taking those five seats. They may actually succeed in getting a filibuster-proof 60-seat majority.
When Republicans lose the White House and the senate, their plan is to give Garland the vote. That is not going to happen. Obama will withdraw the nomination and allow the Dem victor choose the next SCOTUS nominee.
The next SCOTUS nominee will be someone Murkowski despises (IF she wins her own re-election).
That's called karma. She shouldn't have played games.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-71750ec50d8c4f6da2ea6bbea19126f4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: If the mother/wife saw Nathanial with a gun and did not tell the troopers, isn't she responsible for this tragedy as well?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-8afeafc79ea24958932a0daa05e98c40 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Let's be honest here . Those are the one's who fought him. The public needs to know.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7cf926cf4ef2436aa42082a0cb7c724c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Please tell me what it is like in your perfect world.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-8c93bdc7f4a745d18ad4cffd6c9028e1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: For me, in public interests dialogue, civility is basic. If you prefer to deal in issues of civility rather than public interest substance, then this forum on news articles will not satisfy you. Nor should it! Confrontation over civility is not among its' (:or my own) goals.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-0e8f69507b9e49e0bc8c677d331adf23 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: we already have laws that make driving reckless illegal, running stop signs, driving distracted, or driving while texting.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-ce945c9bd3da4ee0b6c293417ae58f38 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: What a person is arrested for may not be what the person is indicted for by the Grand Jury.
"Intent" is the magic word in this scenario. She "intended" to use a knife; did she "intend" to kill him?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-de5085ab590f45f5b37d0d8f453ff509 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: i did not know trump had anything to do with this. can you provide details on that?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-d52cac00998f400db0099fd66d6b911a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: But how we supposed to know how rich a person is out in the valley if they're not allowed to have garbage strewn around their property?
Wasn't the Mayor's political slogan, "A junk pile for every yard!"
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-6408d8836e3344118c2cb8bee7de2f30 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Time to start eliminating departments.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-77bf0d0ac5614ce2a9ac35923adc3cce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: So if I say this is consistent with sharia law; you will take down my comment.
Why? Because you are afraid.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-672ed60de053424d91a4f40a18b364df |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: We sent one to jail for a $600 bribe, others for work contracts. Are there some who are more privileged than others?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-b439b70046814327af679d54ab5290d3 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: ms. kravitz... ahhh, a true believer and bold practitioner of neighborhood watch.. you make a good point as to why the minimum age is what it is...
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-f0d73e0adaa74a43b85238494e3c75d9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: The NRA doesn't suggest that automatic weapons should be available at the local gun store. The NRA is not a terrorist organization. Let's see....who was it that gave automatic weapons to the drug cartels in the "Fast and Furious" fiasco?The goal of the NRA is to insure that the right to keep and bear arms by law-abiding citizens is not infringed. The NRA is the advocate for law abiding citizens to maintain the ability to protect themselves and their families. The NRA's sole purpose is to lobby against the liberal ideology like Hillary Clinton's which would like to turn the United States into a gunfree zone like Australia or France.....or Chicago. We are not like other countries and to take away the guns of law-abiding citizens is a fantasy you liberals have that would result in another Civil War. Period! Fortunately for you, law-abiding gun owners will always prevail in this country to prevent common criminals and Hitlers of the world from controlling a defenseless citizenry.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-64719715e297491e8974c3ee755de888 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Don't forget that seven (7) Federal Judges who were appointed for life made this decision on your behalf to protect you from the evils of a concealed firearm somewhere in California.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-90195ec41c844fafb8cc79cf34e850a7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: If this won't convince you to kill your television, nothing will.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-aefcee0bb9f44994a2a1363e5a3473bb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: They were actually a very nice couple in over their head with a misbehaving dog they didn't know how to train. I know this because I actually spoke to them and had a conversation instead of just peeing my pants in fear and blasting away at everything that moved around me.
I didn't even feel the need to draw my bear spray actually.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-39a696dcc5c74dd0b6e586ed6afb5122 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wolves in the wild typically only live between 6 and 8 years. If these wolves are 10, then they are really decrepit old senior citizens at this point. And once they get habituated to killing livestock, they will not stop. They will just keep coming back time and time again, just as these wolves did.
Think of this as being more of an act of euthanasia. It is really showing kindness to them, to relieve them from the stress and misery of old age, and all of its pains and disabilities. They have lived long and good lives, and eaten plenty of meat. Let them move on to wolf heaven. It is their proper time.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-87b56b5f9cd14058b61023855152a9dd |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wonder why no comments are allowed about the article on Jack Dalton, the sexual pervert who likes to prey on young boys?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-216ca931cc3c4dce83650bc390ab859a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Well, you lost me at "democracy", (actually you lost me at your first comment) as you clearly know nothing!! We are a Republic!!!
You go Jeff...but good luck at being nice and "trying" to educate these fools! ! You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think! Especially if they're liberals
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-64b26257d2604be482f856f6481c87c9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's about time to get rid of those piece of sh!t golf courses.... Thank you Spring Capital!!!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-3d8ef82124ab4e15bf5d11afdc68b767 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Have they voted on anything serious lately? (sarc)
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7cbb997264b94bb9a93594c54425d934 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I guess we will see how it works. From the tone, it sounds like creating a safe zone where feeling won't be hurt by opinions that are too diverse. The left has been squeezing speech for some time in the university- hope this is not the case here and the comments section become a left wing echo chamber.- Time will tell.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-f073a2c5b3004babace839e5463cc8af |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: This is not the 1st time DOT has worked in this area due to erosion problems. Google Map this area and you will see how wide the rivedbed is and how it narrows down. This is a prime are that needs to have the gravel extracted and rechannel the river. We spend money by putting band aids on erosion control and buying private property when they get flooded out. It is time we make money by selling gravel. We open more and more land to gravel extraction and then the land is pretty much useless. We will always need gravel products, it's to use the riverbed. And yes, we extract gravel from other riverbeds here in Alaska.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-79f7034093b5470cbc9b8cc86f04428e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: What??? You want the gubbermint to protect you? The solution, obviously, would have been to have had other armed citizens in the bar...
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-36274f68538f46b2bd4ed062fa8da894 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: This was a hit. A bold hit. 3:30 pm, entered home, shot pet. Random, not in a million years.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-60061065c2194dc9b025163d19cb51c9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Uh, yeah you do *if* someone is threatening harm to you and/or family. Tallman assaulted Larson several times with the intent to harm. Tallman's intentions were obviously not good ones and Larson acted within his rights to self-preservation to defend himself on his own property. Larson does not seem the type to fit your so-called definition of a person "just looking for a reason to run around blasting away..." but he does sound like someone who was merciful in only wounding Tallman, not giving him a fatal shot. There is no handgun epidemic -- guns are not an epidemic on their own. It's specific (often dumb) *people* using handguns that are the epidemic -- those often not registering their firearms, aren't trained, and often, running around only with violent intentions, not for reasons of self-defense.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-d88bb8c255a54598b59284968614fa88 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: There is a long history of the elders in a society believing that the past is superior to the present and that the young are incapable of ensuring the future.
It is, however, my personal perception of an extreme and growing polarization of two-party politics and a reluctance to seek or accept compromise that has become the norm in my lifetime.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-12d0087a2bfe4ce8aae1e51a33c4d9f0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Since when does doing historic research and publishing a book, make one a traitor?
I suggest you read Fahrenheit 451 by Kurt Vonnegut. At least read the Wiki. Please. Everyone.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-88a767fa47b946c4a95ecf323359f6af |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: This sounds rather like the apocryphal story of the Texas coroner who said the corpse with 43 gunshots to the back was "the worst case of suicide he'd ever seen".
Who filed the initial report with Harney County?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-642bf590dcad40a8917c309e7d71b71d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Alaskans voted this moron into office. Maybe Sarah will come back
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-0f02ba0c2a264772832791f5b5d18813 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I checked her Facebook page she actually lied about her child having cancer; I didn't want to believe that a person would actually do it; but sure enough for months she was on her page promoting her business and talking about her fight for her daughters cancer.
Truly sick and disgusting, exploiting your own kid for money. How is loss of freedom and losing your children worth any amount of money? Not just the money she got in donations but the money she got for her company because people used her business over others in a way to help her gain extra cash.
I'm beyond floored and her marvelous maid business which was expanding from Fairbanks to a second one in Wasilla I guarantee you is dead and gone now.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-c20d81b9005b408aa18ecb939abb081f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Thought in all of the wisdom by those on the road system, they shut down all the bars of the Ferry's
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-3efb505c3cf54e13b2c6cd001e168956 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Good job Mr. Larson. Should happen like this more often. Let the criminals be afraid that John Q Public might just shoot them if they make the decision to break the law.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-2ce92474d07f4e118c8525cdfbed8866 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Close yet far away
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-c58353d4ca3a4362b8e194e9fda6984d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sorry but this country has had enough CHANGE from the current administration. Anyone voting for this person needs their brain examined. Knowing what she did, and ignoring it, screams war crimes to the masses. The last thing we needs is another liar and cheat in office.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-ecde350c023040b7a4745ed11388a557 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: against the MOA code to shoot, he should have beat the dog with a stick or bat.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-33f665c5d6b342579f1fb11246d84968 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: This stuff will not stop until the people band together and stage a God Almighty revolt. Is anyone picketing the LIO?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-d2f0b7f58726461b85832faf5578d949 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: LOLOL @ supporting family by killing your kid.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-4c6c7058372140418c4631351cfdf820 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Funny that Jonah complains about young-uns being inaccurate about the various stripes of political ideology, but then is fine broadly calling Sanders a Socialist when he is a Social Democrat and then spends the rest of the essay warning us about Marx and the Soviet Union.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-46de81b8d4e745d48246108427ab56d8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Notice how you failed to address the fact I referenced, and went straight into attacking me with juvenile remarks? The more liberals cram us in on top of each other through high density planning the more traffic becomes congested. More people = more traffic, and therein why the problem is going to become worse. rather then post juvenile remarks attacking me, try addressing the issue of this board, and the fact I have referenced.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-9f6418f8d9bf4948b3c18870bd688387 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Ok how about we place you in a room in front of your family and give a drugged crazed criminal a knife with instructions to charge at and murder you and your family. You have to make a split second decision. Do you choose a taser or a gun? We will even train you on how to use both.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-7bda23423a7c4b568eda0a7217971b6d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: As they should have along time ago after noting the corrupt and frightening dealings of the Clintons, regardless of Bernie or anyone else in the Revolution picture.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-0efc9a64226d4809a868414d29a3a373 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: There should be no "middle" on the free $700 million per year tax credit, because the oil price increased from $26 to $46 and Conoco, Exxon and BP did not increase oil production. The oil tax credit has to be completely done away to save Alaska from bankruptcy.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-f69aa3ddadac44fab2c7ceba2e98853e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Nice save!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-4ca33d2027c645acbf973bcb00b5454c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I hope that Clent Wilson gets to spend time in a prison cell with Bubba.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-111795bef0b746e2a839ec3360f84908 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: they sound like Trump republicans,, and yes, they need to go away for good
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-a36f6542bae2405295c4519f89ec5482 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: “If we go there (the Permanent Fund) first, it takes off the intensity and energy from drilling down the cost of government,” Dunleavy said.
Wow. I actually agree with Boss Dunleavy on this one. Before they raid the Permanent Fund, legislators need to drill down the cost of government- starting with the money set aside for Legislator Salary Padding.
http://www.adn.com/sites/default/files/2015%20Legislative%20Travel%20Report.pdf
Legislators exploit an obscure section of IRS code & get "reimbursed" for lodging and food at the federal per diem rate-regardless of expenses- rather than at the state per diem rate used by the governor and other state employees.
In addition to their $53,000 salaries, legislators use this gimmick to loot the state treasury and stuff thousands of dollars in excess "reimbursement" into their pockets.
Drill, baby, drill.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-fbbe789b80e24d829da797de2f099454 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Gee, a 3 and 1/2 "minute" working session in the Senate. Mr Senate President, I would agree with you and your totally arrogant and idiotic statement. The People of this State gave all of you lazy puds 90 days to get er done and yet you totally ignore it! Now all efforts at anything have stopped because the House is playing politics. Yes the issue is important, but if the steak isn't done, you can still eat a salad while you wait! Or you can mow the lawn, anything but suck out of the trough and whine!
$12,500 per day? Flying home for the weekend and not getting back for work on Monday? In the real working world you would be Fired! You in Juneau have become as big a joke as our National Congress.
I suggest another voter initiative, one which would stop all per diem after a 90 day session! Another option would be sequestering all legislators in a motel 6 until the job is done. Bread and water only! Disgusting!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-82ff0a7da7d64586a590d60f026c82f4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: No - nor do I want my income confiscated with an income tax to pay for this crap
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-cb474bf462b44dbfaffad740489fe8c6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Maybe Palin could manage to shoot a big bad cow by herself with less than 5 shots.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-d441cae46eea4461ae57f015e89e3178 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: The author is correct here. Most everyone realizes that there will be changes coming, perhaps some types of taxes or changes to the PF and/or PFD are eventually coming down the pipe. But there is an order to the process and step one is in the form of some belt tightening. This is an absolute must and the minority party apparently is blocking it as the pander to their contributors.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-4f3cd53e8c35468584802f9919e91bba |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: More lies from Cynthia Franklin. Cole memo means nothing at this point....Pathetic attempt by government workers to stop the will of the voters again! TAR and FEATHER THEM!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-d2a6dc0d62ca4a58ac8b2f55b9783da1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: How mature of you.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-cb03ad3ba1754c6a94953660c168523a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: That is not a tax that is a choice.
BTW change you username, if you live out of state it is inappropriate to refer to yourself as an Alaskan.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-ec29ec9550724fe2acd4c3408b857f42 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sovereign immunity is the state --and its employees--get out of jail free card. It should be done away with.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-67434b77d4f1417da45462e06d0db52c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: What the hell is wrong with people! Sick fucks! These are children not animals!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-ce99b0bb643b4b75ae65229ab883bb80 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Umpqua Community College student concealed carrier Christopher Harper Mercer (MSNBC 01 Oct 2016):
“Luckily we made the choice not to get involved,” he explained. “We were quite a distance away from the building where this was happening. And we could have opened ourselves up to be potential targets ourselves, and not knowing where SWAT was, their response time, they wouldn’t know who we were. And if we had our guns ready to shoot, they could think that we were bad guys."
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-bd815df882b24ca5aca6b6c07ce0ff50 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Bill, I can't believe that the judge allowed only 20 K bail. Forced entry with a handgun, robbery, attempted murder and willful animal cruelty resulting in the shooting death of the victims dog...
What in the world was the presiding judge thinking? The judge, in this instance, was WRONG!!!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-7974f4e497b4435698b1d1319d78347c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Mary Ann Chaney - I'm a supervoter who is also a parent and I haven't voted for school bond issues in decades, not since I visited my husband's elementary school in New Hampshire that was built in 1879. It has been remodeled and refurbished. It's energy efficient, it has a computer lab, it has many modern conveniences. It's 137 years old. The idea that we have to replace school buildings every 30 years is ridiculous and it's time to stop that sort of waste.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-730de7828e8f4053a8242e2efca466ef |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It is fascinating just how many Big-L liberals still wax wroth over the Reagan administration, figuratively thrashing around the floor and chewing sticks. :-/ Don't they realize that Ronnie's term in office ended nearly 30 years ago, and that the man himself has been dead for a decade?? =:-o Time to just Let It Go, already!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-9beb050d41214713a0c4c7454ed00537 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It is sad...we should really only hate others based on their gender, not race - yes?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-10d578068a5f465c855a72e227c60831 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'm hoping for more snow in the mountains. We could use some more.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-03a6a001d14b4eb4889e379c7891e526 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: What does your parent's political affiliation have to do with other kids falling through ice or going through a windshield? Maybe those kids had Democrats for parents, and you're lucky to be alive due to your parents being Republicans...
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-6c7b0153431240739e76fbcb9feb4ceb |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: One could also ask if Americas standing in the world was enhanced or diminished, and is it now a safer place since her serving as secretary of state?
I heard someone asked her if she was going to see the film " Thirteen Hours" and she replied that no, she already slept through it once.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-e8612f480aaf4c7faad0be328762f5b0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: The problem with Schirokauer's statement is that this was not precipitated by natural factors but by human caused one's. This is not only true for the recently killed alpha male but it actually dates back to Feb 2005 when Coke Wallace killed the alpha female of East Fork. This has caused an unrelenting series of disruptions including the dispersal of the alpha male to the south where he was shot south of Cantwell in April of 2005 leaving six 1-2 year olds.
Since that time, the disruption caused by these 2005 deaths have lead to severe territorial shifting to the east & then north further exposing them to trapper/hunter caused deaths, changes in den sites, changes in use of the park road corridor, to the point where the primary family group of wolves with the longest lineage in Denali has seldom been seen since the summer of 2004.
A question to ask NPS is how can they manage for the overall population & give no consideration to the importance of individuals & family groups?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-f2a441ef4097417ab47815cd5526a246 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Do oil tax credits tug at your heartstrings; feeling stupid?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-4e857ca456614832a2a010b00fd2af02 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: After reading the park rules, I can only conclude the only activity allowed in a park is to sit quietly, disturb no one and wait to die. (I may have missed the dying restriction in the ordinance).
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-b580b6d5218f4ff2b4b2e46f40b9afb5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: "Unwanted pregnancies" struck me as something I hadn't heard before about pot smokers. Care to share a source for that "evidence"? When I think of pot culture stereotypes, I think of two scruffy guys on a couch eating Doritos... not the usual set-up for pregnancy, unwanted or not!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-b32be8b0bee64e7db5209265eca1c895 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: He wants everyone to pay their way, but when the state makes the borough, city, or town pay its way, that is bad? One way or the other, the costs either get cut or more taxes are ladled on. I would rather it be my local government, then the state to be collecting the taxes. If it is the state, then they have to take their slice before passing it along to local government. If it is local, I have a say on how it is assessed and I am paying directly, not through a middle man.
So tired of Dermot. He needs to take a break.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-b9109e5cfcd34b948fed8d9a5f44bacd |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Supposedly, HB 2960, which established this program provides that "(n) Provide that the State of Oregon and employers that participate in the plan have no proprietary interest in the contributions to or earnings on amounts contributed to accounts established under the plan."
Of course, that is a Legislative Law; they can change it any time Senator Prozanski or Representative Barnhart or any other Democrat decides that they need more money for one of their programs; they are in the Majority and can just slap the Emergency Clause on new Legislation anytime they feel like it and do whatever they please because the Republicans have no say and the people can't do an Initiative to stop them.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-ebe87cc590904d29810ee66dc8606ed6 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Without opining on the rightness or wrongness of his choice, a lab, most medium dogs, can run around 30 mph. That's 44 feet in a second. A fairly big yard depth. One second isn't a lot of time to do assess, decide and react, much less do multiple things, until the dog is on you once it starts running.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-c1733710578c4758a9b0d63270df7d76 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: We simply have to reduce the cost of educating public school students. We spend like $18,000 per student and this amount is ridiculous and unsustainable. School administration must be reduced.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-a40b868b14584d80a04c0a1dfd64909d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I saw the Alaska Federation of Natives ditch Parnell because they had dealt with him for 5 years on the release of the Fairbanks Four and got nowhere. Walker promised them if they got him elected he'd put his business partner to work as Attorney General and get the 4 released. Corruption witnessed by all Alaskans.
Regardless of the party, regardless of the race, regardless of the state, it's all full of corruption.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-c71e02c841a2449fba0306e21c17d760 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Joe Schmitz, Caribou Barbie's band buddy and prodigiously inept Commissioner of Corrections, got a mammoth no confidence vote, early in his tenure. The C.O.'s were right, but neither she nor Parnell cared about that and let him blow a quarter of a billion dollars on the Goose Creek prison disaster, designed and built by the old proposed partners of Bill Weimar. I hope Williams isn't cut from the same cloth.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-9d0325d5ee484bc5a9ae527ff41dd547 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: You really need to learn how the delegate system works. You don't really "win" a state. You win delegates, proportionally. Sanders is far, far, far behind.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-ce15227bbb03492b9efac5ffe792c2c5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: The income tax is not the issue. The issue is the oil and commercial fishing giveaways. They'll be giving away $775MM in oil credits next year and the commercial fishing taxes are a joke. Correcting those 2 issues will eliminate at least 25% of the deficit, maybe more. Why should we be so willing for them to take our hard earned money when they will just be giving it away? An income tax should be the absolute last resort.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-acbc1cf8b9e1474b9628bc9cd98ad9ce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sen. Kelly somply doesn't want the state to pay for the work of the church caring for the least of these.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-19201c82f0a444daa8ae11462d048d94 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: So you're going to pound all Islam followers, all because 1 homophobic one just killed 50 ? It appears he didn't do this in the name of religion, either.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-00839bf14ed14fbd9b098a05bc8914ef |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: What's your opinion on the $7oo million per year welfare cheque given to the oil corporations?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7678fe840776446aaa63c3de64fb9da4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: _"Buh Bye Hillary"_ -- "4:20" the anonymous poster
Buh Bye "4:20"!
And, good riddance.
-- Paul
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-ae8eac4401144d6d9fe85c13097bd105 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: As we have seen on news casts even with video proof you have difficult time removing cops from the force for unprofessional behavior or unjustified shooting. Wooten like to flaunt his copship. He was not a true law enforcement officer. Idiot fits in family of disfunctional idiots.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-66c036f9aa574ed188c40fdc1dfe1b32 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I don't buy or sell drugs Jay. So no bumps in the night. But once when I was on a medical vacation in California I awoke to find a guy asleep on the couch in the living room. I let him sleep. But when I started making breakfast he woke up and screamed "What are you doing in my dorm room!" I fed him breakfast and sent him on his way. If he'd been belligerent I would have whacked him on the head with the cast iron skillet!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-8d1e548eddb24673a07b410cc0b1e5bc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Can Ryan look his children in the eye and say he endorsed by his own and all of us a person who is the difinition of racist. Hope his children won't have the same beliefs. Parents are role models and Ryan if things are gone another way in the last election he would have been a heart beat away from being the President. So much for his future. He did however say he make a mistake once,apology accepted but has to act quickly but clear up this "brain fart"!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7b13c86db1054ceaabf294777184c33f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Natron Wood Products is not within any city limit, or even within the urban growth boundary either. It is next to the road in between Jasper and Fall Creek. The way the law reads, it would thus seem that he would of had to have intentionally attempted to have used the gun against a another person, in order to be charged with unlawful use of a weapon.
Yet, this article says nothing about him doing that. In fact, it states that he fired in an unknown direction. So if the direction that he shot in is indeed unknown, how can he be charged with this crime? I don't understand that.
There must be more to this story.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-24700466549140e4a7c504edc4d85f00 |