input
stringlengths 797
1.79k
| output
sequencelengths 1
1
| id
stringlengths 41
41
|
|---|---|---|
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Many of the women I know personally are very comfortable with Trump and plan on voting for him.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-bad3b1aafa8c457b93097a8efac766f9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: You are insulting someone who doesn't deserve it. She is not stupid, clingy or a nag. She is strong and helps other people at the drop of a hat. You don't know any of the story so quit reading between the lines. Instead of getting a pat on the back, hopefully he will get several years in prison.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-3f2bf6be681d4f83b28380af7cd6351d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I don't doubt that many homeless people who overuse alcohol did so before becoming homeless. I just don't believe that is a "leading" cause of homelessness. As I understand it, Egan was denied admission to the Mission because he was drunk, so he laid down in a field and froze to death. Being an alcoholic should not be a death sentence.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-f28b3660eebb44689e99d7cff55c59d0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Yet woodstoves are a "cultural issue..." "It's very cultural."
Not to worry, a 12-step bureaucratic task force pilot program needs only scant millions of our tax dollars: http://apps.lanecounty.org/WebCast/Play5.aspx?mid=1183 @56:00
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-9ae08e8843bc416cbcfb3d43bf37548b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wow - someone should do a little fact finding /research before writing..Just spent the afternoon with 500+ pugs- not single one collapsed from lack of air, not a single popped out eye. Granted pugs can overheat easily - like any bracheocephalic dog. So can many humans.
Be a responsible owner - easy enough to avoid that issue
All dog breeds have their health issues. Please stop maligning one breed or their owners - just for your "cute - agenda filled" article.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-4d354314bfe14168a584ab09c4c41842 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: From the eyewitness that was interviewed and aired on TV Thursday, the shooter killed the person from 20 to 30 feet away, while their wasn't any threatening moves by the victim, as in hurriedly approaching the shooter. The eyewitness also said he himself has a permit to carry, and in his opinion, this was an unwarranted killing, whereas there wasn't any warning by the killer made toward the victim to stop or there wasn't any attempt by the shooter to disengage himself from the shooter in any way.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-a132514158524bef943ddb32fa867acc |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's always awkward when a person dies and, in your overview of the impact of his/her death, you see a chance for an improvement in the welfare of the country. B. Carfree has expressed that dilemma as tastefully, I think, as possible. Were it one of the liberal Justices who had died, conservatives would be facing the same dilemma. billhooper5, below, implies that counterpoint position in his criticism of B. Carfree's post.
Obviously, the stakes in November's election have just risen. We can be guaranteed that the GOP controlled Senate will block any Obama nomination. Therefore, one of the first duties on a newly elected President will be to select a new Supreme Court Justice. One of the first duties of a newly elected Senate will be to consider that nomination and approve or reject it. The importance of control of the Senate has just spiked up several notches.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-4953f408aa474e569c6105a294bbe904 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Keep telling yourself it's "honesty"...in reality it's a pathological hatred of women
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-dc5027705b4d46499d581807e1fbb439 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: David-It matters not who is currently in charge. The ADN is biased.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-51be40bef1d843a1a4593a76ecb18b34 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I laugh every time I think about all the times an obnoxious former pro union step-father used to scream bloody murder how my non-union mother made more money than he did at the same company, and he even had seniority.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-1ec4b823c2f24c0fbd22cbd30347d087 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It took 6 years to put a man on the moon from the time Kennedy proposed it in 63. Check your facts, lest you sound like an ignorant fool.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-ff8d664a968249ea8d5ee9de23371dc2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Hmmmmm, some kind of new biathalon. Have wild sex and then jump in and swim across river. By that time tho, there probably wouldn't be anything left to hang the ribbon on.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-9e70b36b4eeb454eab31a7b685ad4672 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wow, so you provide drugs to abuse kids and that isn't enough for the DA?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-2e6d7ae1f94d4c60b8e819605256a852 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wait.....aren't arrest records public information?
You can find them on most law enforcement websites...
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-d039c1037f724e4fb755f326f6187fce |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I wonder if you will be making the same comment next year when it's locker rooms that that need to respect gender identity?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-4f8c7f6f1d29487ca5d1fc00f20c3501 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Since you're moving to Canada just know that the airlines don't accept EBT cards as payment.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-868f939808074f2abe2b202cb9c2867b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Mine voted for it - the right vote. But you are right. All should be in favor. Those not should explain their vote, yes?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7a2e3497bce948d285ab5dfcda3c7d70 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: FYI, once you feed it, it's YOUR cat. Put a bell collar on it and it will not be able to kill much besides lizards.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-709be47d40e545d7a789e7f549f9e78c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: This was a conservative, right wing government 15 years ago that passed this law. The Republicans and gung ho on that 2nd amendment and that is fine, but the 4th amendment. They would repeal it if they could. They do not care about civil liberties OR the rule of law. Blame Obama for continuing it, but even if he vetoed this law when it was up for "renewal", it would have been overridden.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-97330f56769644a29d93e12409291014 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: People are feeling disenfranchised by both political parties. Big money interests have purchased politicians in both parties so that no matter which party is in power, they still win. The rise of Sanders and Trump are testament to the frustration of the American people to the status quo. Sanders represents the desire to return to the progressive policies of presidents beginning w FDR that made this the country the envy of the world. Sadly, this country started turning it's back on populist policies in favor of corporatism beginning w the Carter administration. Unfortunately, the Trump candidacy is channeling this same frustration into baser human emotions of hate and prejudice.
There can be no hope for this country as long as we have a stranglehold on our political process by the two party system controlled by corporate interests. The current system of closed primaries and presidential debates is designed to prevent the rise of new parties responsive to the will of the people.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-4a7dbf8e26fb47d18063f751e1becfb1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Hmm...I too worked in DOC prior to Department level status when it was still an entity of H&SS under Helen Bierne thru to it's morphing into a Department. It has grown a lot. More staff, more inmates, more institutions. As with any entity that gets large, especially government, "Murphy's Law" at all levels kicks in all the much harder. Kevin Brew and Gerald Tamura commented. These people have "seen this elephant" during long careers and no doubt could speak at length.Time will tell how Dean Williams as Commissioner will work out. But one word of caution to him: Don't be the type of Commissioner that places the staff in the position of becoming more concerned of the "figurative knife" in the back from administration rather than being able to concentrate on their job. It has happened all too often.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-bcb2d02e234e4eed88eb268cb97344f4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Our Labs would have licked one to death.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-8a9eabefb31f4ebe860218f5e4f06391 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: OV,
Let's say your view is 100% spot-on. Oregon democrats found away to tax businesses with annual sales in Oregon above $25 million with a 2.5% rate with no, nada, nyet, 0 effect on Oregonians. Hurray! Yowza! Raise that 2.5% another .05%! How long do you think it will be before other states take notice and go for that "free" money also? Do you think that will affect corporate national pricing strategy? If so, it will only be a matter of time before Oregonians are "trickled" on.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-dfe69133482a4e9e9e1fec262b62d129 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Ross was on the all star Babe Ruth team from Ketchikan, way back about or before your dad and Russ Brown disappeared, He's come back home
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-b8ef5fd05d044d28aff105ef66bd528d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Why are these two still in office? Cant their constituents see what idiots they are? Vote them out.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-685bd12e3a7940e2a5feb703534666a8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Kathleen, The "criminals" marijuana gardeners and smokers "criminals" not so much.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-00542e28d53c44208730dda62ec23468 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: You recall wrong. He converted in 1964, while he didn't get the notice for draft until 1966-67. And no, he was not a coward.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-f302adf4ec884a2bb813a990fbf62c8e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Or else you get your genitals mutilated without ANY consent from you...and, depending on the country of your indoctrination, much worse happens to those born helplessly into a world of perpetual fear of an imaginary sky daddy. You want that kind of life, Mr. Minshall? How very oppressed you are.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-facbc427513344cfb1951ff544610721 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Dick and Elvi are at every Taku Campbell Community Council and give us a good explanation of all the assembly work we need. Very well appreciated. Bravo to both, we have good representation.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-6ad0c3e6f74c4bf4b5e17483d32e689a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Too bad that life is such a "risk" join the club Buddy!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-465c5dabca3e4584b914b8b1c4759d9f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: That is a blatant lie.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-b179a8620d2348deac3747a14b61ed2c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Go watch the you tube video called HOONAH LEGACY. It shows what Sealaska did and still does to forestland. They DID cut to the creek edges, they DID create landslides into rivers, they DID NOT replant, and you know it, or you are daft.
Sealaska steals from it's own shareholders. Google Sealaska Underground and read from the horse's mouth what they have done to the native peoples.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-b89d3baeea494d9096f065c247814506 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Kriner's makes great food and really supreme chocolate cake!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-199db9db68ad4d6d9d0aad4ffb7da7e5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Just curious, Was it not the Legislators that wrote the tax law for the oil producers? Was it not the Legislators that went on a mindless spending spree?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-de5d1794015c48fca4ca2295e36d202c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: East HS is a good school with a serious graduation problem but I'm sure your son will do well there, mine did.
Welcome back to Alaska.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-57dbb7e7048f44dda6a566d1bcc7532f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Trump is hoping to provoke violence.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-850f936b9ba447d0a4f6d9e768622f9f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: We need to also substantially reduce the number of state employees in line with revenue. Sacrifice is when you get a call not to come back to the Slope because your rig has been laid down
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-0a645ed775364988b2f48b138b52988f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: what if the winds blowing into your face? 12 gauge shotgun utilizing proper "slug" loads is the best close range stopper and will deter any bear
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-0a230710739b45abaaed501c3ffd581a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: oooo, scary...'beware in november'.
remember when we threw sean parnell into the briar patch?
he sure is suffering now, you betcha!
that'll larn 'em.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-43d52d134ab64f34acae269a52550adf |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: in other words he is right and you can not come up with a response.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-110e7825646347f3b1b3bbf1d6c71502 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Glad to see that this guy was caught. It's not smart to open a door unarmed in the world we live in today.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-4f653c15aed8454ea185b8e70d20cbd4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Bet China and Russian equipment works real well in space and on ground base.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7377be8e12e64f5ca541fbd22762a474 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: For all you haters of Don Young, he has done more for Alaska than any of you, I don't like him much either, however he has dedicated his life to serving Alaska, has he benefited, yes, has Alaska benefited, yes, and Alaska more so.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-73a941f894fc42d4b9bb47b17938fb50 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: A Møøse once bit my sister... No realli!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-a2000769278049c9ba31824dd8a977de |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Nobody faults anyone for protecting their children. Its when they go to unnecessary, outrageous extents to do so. He created MORE danger to his children by shooting a dog in its own yard; he is damn lucky the dog owner didn't come out shooting back, which he would have been in the right to do. Luckily for all the dog owner was more level headed.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-c09d4ff3ceb64309825bd954fc52416c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It is very important we eat local foods as much as possible. This will help your body build towards pollen as such. Eat lots of greens and supplement with food sources containing amino acids, such as arginine, ornithine, carnitine, cysteine, glutathione, lysine and taurine. They are part of the building blocks of protein. They are tremendously important; deficiencies in these amino acids frequently produce immune system weakness. The basic function of the white blood cells and the immune system is to gobble up foreign invaders, bacteria, viruses and parasites, therefore if they are not healthy and if you are not eating well or resting well they will not be on their best. Emotional and spiritual factors, a positive mental attitude, self-esteem, visualization, relaxation, exercise, breathing exercises and meditation all have a very good effect on immunity. Don't let this article scare you, just use it as a tool and prepare yourself and family, by focusing on a better diet and lifestyle.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-9e877b8d201b446baaf4f209a0e4a37c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Hey so the person commenting under the name opinions why dont u go fuck yourself. Because were u there when she died? Instead of coming and offering rumors and insults on my friend whos dead show some respect and offer some condolences. She may have not been makin the best choices but in no way asked for or deserved what happened.U still have a voice. She doesnt. R.i.p courtney funk. And opinions- get bent
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-b2dabfefcb7444dca8aeb790e817cb38 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Wittshirk: Employers have gotten in the habit of reviewing employees, and job applicants "Face-Book" and other social media pages, including comments sections. You are advocating that people risk their lively-hood by commenting under their real names. Social media has become very important for reaching the public, for expressing ideas and opinions. Your position would have a significant portion of the public silenced. In my particular case, I don't post under my real name, but in many of my posts I have given enough info for anyone to figure out who I am. And if someone decides to go through that minor effort, then they could make me a target, and provoke personal attacks against me. If and when it happens, I will quit commenting. Don't want to have to read my opinions? Then "pull my cover" and attack me personally. I will simply go back to not being involved in my community.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-7359167790ad46deb94323410ef3bf98 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: 2 big issues here. (1) Who controls Alaska's K12 ed system, the federal govt or Alaska; (2) Alaska has a problem with a valid test which informs us how well our students are doing-the State has been fooling parents, kids and teachers regarding student achievement.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-58965eca87fc4a8584828233cc4b6508 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: If we vote, instead, for those who are neither Republican or Democrat, who will we have left to vote for, and will those minor political parties be able to field candidates in all districts? I don't know any other party that can do that. The majority of voting Alaskans are registered as non-aligned/non-partisan/independent (choose your label). But there is NO political party that sponsors this type of candidate. Now, if enough people choose to rally around "anyone but D / R," perhaps we can see what a Legislature can do outside of the "mainstream" political system. But, most importantly, we need to have those candidates on the ballot. Where are they?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-e136018ca6cc4286a85c5206affab4b5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Surprisingly, the comments are mainly in the + column but for the Usual Suspects.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-38b2a158be8a4783b1ba25bc544c86e1 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: There's no debate, Mark. Animals think, have feelings, friends and families--it's a fact. Everyone deserves to be free from unnecessary suffering and death. It's the truth. We are not there collectively as a race yet, but we are getting there.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-fd59a5d1f56e416d9ba84745f359e9a9 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Nah, not really.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-464f0015e1e143ebabcb3cace94ca27c |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: APU does not have the faculty or facilities to increase enrollment of native students only to change the ratio to the required percentage. They would have to drop non-native students to achieve the necessary percentage.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-fdb8e64106c64b6b9caf2ee7693b4638 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: What a silly comment. Canada IS a peaceful place. I DO welcome refugees. Take your hate elsewhere, preferably back into your hole where it belongs.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-8cf9c0115f204514a6b2c8f7f1fd7af2 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Tell your annology to Russia, we - the US of A bought all Alaska from them,,, Everything in the box for 25 cents per acre...
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-500dad15c09744e092b2ff7d93cdea01 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: You try to be funny with the insinuation that old problems that affected both parties still exists among Democrats, but the truth makes the joke fall flat.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-aa81858290e146f0b368c001b57aa761 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.22moneybay.com
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-2c895d472d6f465980a07bd7cde68cfd |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: When did he get it from the gun safe Bonner put it in after he came back seven months later?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-5a0a7e9180f84c74a6749229f171e3d0 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Do you think Trump will call for them to allow guns at the Republican national convention?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-19fe6f86487d4ede866fc3265dcb221d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Kate, you just lost me. You sold out.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-6329fab67f194642a13900236dd91840 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: It's going to have to be a mix of PF earnings, income tax, gas tax, sales tax in those organized entities that don't have it already, elimination of oil tax credits.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7b134f8418b74af990b769bebd2ce67b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: You make a statement about fact checking with zero facts..Holy Cow indeed!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-4c19cf17e92644bf829568228380bdda |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I'll bet that Cat would say that in person. The appropriate response is to flag and move on or ignore the post. I find Cat to be one of the most humorous posters on here.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-74f025a52300495f85fe89c4fd228ac5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: WTH Pete Kelley!!! That's what we need.. Concealed guns on campus!! How can this be passed without the vote of the PEOPLE!!!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-1233ea87c7c44258a00a280d60291c2a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: The issue ScienceDuck is that by using her own email server to store her emails (which no one else has ever done, despite the misstatement by Wills to the contrary), Clinton gave herself complete and sole control and access to her email archive, even though it was being used for official government business. The difference between Clinton and Rice or Powell is that they also had government email accounts, which they primarily used for their official business. Clinton, however, NEVER had a govt account. ALL of her email went through her own private server
If she had used a govt account, like Rice and Powell, then the government would have access to the server containing the emails. And if you use a commercial email service like Hotmail, as an example, Microsoft controls and has access to the server that the email resides on.
Clinton basically stored her emails where no one else would have access to them, even though she was conducting government business. How convenient is that?
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-b447d0bdb5ec4358be89785f7a9d2644 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: The remaining wildness of Alaska is what makes it what it is. The obvious solution is for you to move elsewhere and to not expect the world to cater to your personal tastes.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-59c81b88f9424de4b855ebdda76eb833 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: So, an additional descriptive was added. A woman claims to have been raped. A Soho woman claims to have been raped. An immigrant woman, a mute woman, a student.....
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-c73a01bba72a499ababab5590b9562a5 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: You're right. I don't care. They'll game us for every slim percentage they can, as long as we'll let them. They're more than welcome to go drill for someone else's oil in the 3rd world, where their investments can be seized, and their people are routinely kidnapped/murdered etc.
Our legislature is supposed to advocate for AK, and it's clear that these people won't do their job.
The majors make enormous return here, and they always have. The only way we could ever drive them away from AK, would be at gunpoint. They aren't going anywhere.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-4e8b04923cda44e0bba00051708f6fe8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: But they aren't being given to her 'homeless' to live in for free. That's the problem with them.
Of course, if you want to see what happens to an apartment provided to her 'homeless' friends, take a look at what's left of the motel on 7th Street which was featured in a recent R-G article. Those were subsidized by government money and destroyed by the people for whom they were provided.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-fcf370939a8c462f80c2f41a40c7070a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: How about 'Arrogant"? "A law unto himself"? "A vigilante in uniform"? "Unable to control his emotions"? "Egotistic"?
All of those work for me.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-0096d0583a71423898fb5480c4e34f65 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: What legal precedent requires a duly tried and convicted defendant to pay for "upgrades" as part of their restitution? I knew this would turn into a blank check boondoggle. Government always decides to give itself endless free money.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7b2487a2bed54776938ac751cc658a05 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: you have it backwards.
we, the people, are the golden goose and we are being killed by the oilies.
we, the people, need to start applying the molten gold gargle to these slimy landsharks and every one of their political whores.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-c6d622150fa2430eb3f0bbcb10985694 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: So how much time is enough? Some rich white girl got less than a year for actually killing a man.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-10e5f3a13dd04f859ffd64413f37896b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Apparently you haven't yet seen the lady who used to bicycle naked day and night in Eugene regularly. They tried to get her committed but the Court of Appeals reversed her commitment because she wasn't 'a danger to herself or others'.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-abaa8bfe640d43f68c0445a318740b61 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I appreciate your comment about there being possible factors that contributed to the accident which do not have anything to do with the pilot. We have been told by the NTSB that they will be investigating those areas. Those of us making comments only know the immediate outcome. As well as determining probable cause, if possible, the NTSB may also make safety recommendations. I read a briefing of one accident report which states that the NTSB had issued 34 safety recommendations and these were not limited to the actions of the pilots; one recommendation was to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. I have read of ones related to a particular part of an aircraft which applies to the manufacturer of that part, and so on... I will provide bird strike data answers a question contained in another comment.
I also appreciate that you are obviously proactive in the area of aviation safety, having listed the Medallion Foundation.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-aba80bb427c94b89b963d0a3efde1340 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: That is not how it works. ADN, is this Bill Page of the Yukon 800 fame???
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-f21daba266ff458eae093fa71d16cabe |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Just another ding dong in the greatland
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-75653eedaedc4e5b9ac001991efcea2a |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Sometimes, things just don't make sense. For the Troopers to move away from Palmer will leave residents in Sutton, Lazy Mountain, South Knik River and Butte virtually unprotected. Butte and South Knik River will suffer the most due to the well-known reckless recreation activities in their home area.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-b8219eee04c24e36a141b23dcdbe1709 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I just - I just can't tell if you're serious. It's baffling. I'm baffled.
So, Martin, are you telling us you invoked your grandfather as a virtue signal of your own working-class credibility, despite never having met him? How impossibly disrespectful of you. I'm glad your grandfather has passed; it spares him the heart-stabbing shame of an ungrateful, pedantic little snot of a grandson who would seek to ride his coveralls into righteousness. He deserves better than someone like you.
The simple line in Atlantic City-
put on your stockings, babe / night's getting cold
has more weight as art than anything a weak-tea punk like you could create in a million lifetimes. I was deeply moved by that single, almost whispered line when I bought the album at the age of 22, in the year 2000. Did you know he recorded that record alone, on a 4-track? Do you even know what a 4-track is? He covered Suicide on that record, in 1982.
Do you even know who Suicide is, you smarmy little creep?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-c1862e999b404a1ba4482565c93fa9b8 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Other than the obvious---shutting down enablers / magnets for the homeless , Beans Cafe and Brother Francis , we need to think outside the box. The assembly is trying to force the legislature into staying downtown . They have a projected 15 million surplus of money . All they have to do is buy the Spenard Wells Fargo bank for 12 mil. and turn it into rooms for the homeless. That building would house about 400 people . It would take the building away from the legislature trying to safe 20 million and force them to stay downtown. Problems solved.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-bc26df1e99cf47b7b94be29ebe6a8e29 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Eloquently stated Ranger Granger. Sounds like you never made it past third grade.
No wonder you're a republican.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-37398f46625a4cad84ce74119aa8e24e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Daniel, enough already....it is ALASKAs oil, not the oil companies....maybe they should just up and get the hell out and we could use some of OUR PF to pump the stuff....The oil companies (including you) either need to S*** or get off the pot.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-a8be7edc8fef43bd8d034d186f1b5629 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: You say:
"Funny how ADN reporters fail to highlight things like the fact that after this ordeal, a Cordova Trooper paid for the victim’s 5 night hotel stay out of pocket (things like that are not unusual)..."
but in the story it is stated that a trooper paid.
See "According to Brandenburg, one of the troopers at the Cordova post covered a five-night hotel stay for him out of his own pocket."
What does what you write "...day before another ADN reporter’s headline about the shooting of a violent man with knives in his hands who rushed troopers after they try to talk him down, resulting in them shooting him to save themselves from being slashed is summarized by the headline “Troopers shoot and kill man on his birthday.” No bias there, right ADN?
got to do with the story about Christopher and why the heartache about the difference of the two above references?
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-910ef1277c6c4e839db3c7e08d10d462 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: If you shoot your neighbours dog on the day your moving into your new house. Don't expect an invite to the neighbourhood barbeque any time soon!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-1765b84c6d7646a686bf2398d0d7cf6f |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Oh YIPPEE, the progressive like a total liar and traitor who should be behind bars. Oh well it wont make it past Trump.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-fd37d93c136b4337997823ac50c781ec |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I would imagine a responsible person would get another job or even two even if it were washing dishes to take care of his own. A non-productive person would rather take a government handout, that's why our state and national budgets or so badly in debt, plus our education spending is quite ridicules. That's my humble opinion and that's where I would start cutting. Mr. Civility :)
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-b873f01b497444318def2c3e87be164e |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Identify those "rural services" Dial. I get a LOL when you try to pull a wabbit outta yer hat that has holes in it. The wabbits like it too.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-757189fadf79448db259e74db0e95c36 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: have you noticed its always the " trump protestors" , not the trump supporters causing the problems?
every single time....
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-27846a663c0542e0bf70ed9b64e64a5b |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Gee I recall how on at least two occasions when tax payers stood before the Eugene City Council and flat out rejected proposed tax schemes yet the City of Eugene went ahead and place those on a ballot only later to be defeated. So what is the real problem with placing a rural measure on the ballot by Lane County, other then the cost of the measure in ballot print form. Seems governments in Lane County have some strange type of issues when it comes to making available an actual vote of the people.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-c7ababd2298445c3849dffc67df68a71 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I've been around drugs enough to know FORcA FACT that opiate drug users seak these doctors out and are highly aware of the presence for cheap/legally prescribed drugs. They get a few of their buddies to round up a few hundred dollars cash to get in, then they divide up the drug prescription. You act like a doctor who runs a pill mill, and he does, do not kid yourself so you can make an opposing comment/opinion, that he would not know the exact patients to prescive and the excuses he can use. Drug users do not go to get bottles of pills to go kill themselves. They go to get high. If you want evidence, go to every patient he most recently prescribed and do a pill count and new large TV purchases.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-fc53287cc501491fa37fcce0f5e6126d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Ah yes, Donald street, where the city traffic engineers and planners removed several crosswalks with "Crosswalk Closed" signs near the school. We wouldn't want anyone walking to school or the grocery store, now would we?
It infuriates me that our traffic planners/engineers continue to violate the city's official policy as set by the city council. They are supposed to be encouraging active transportation and discouraging personal motor vehicle use. Instead, they consistently build like it's 1950. It's time for a mass lay-off in public works.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-7ce0b0d4759e4422ac726e94d529ef36 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: wow! it launches on 420? strike while the irony is hot!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-969e9baa517b47d1b8edaa51f5b7905d |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: And this from a President that wants to take guns from Americans! Is he just wanting to Help Vietnam wage some revolution against China? We lost in Vietnam because of our own government and now he wants to put a new war in play for our future generations? It wasn't pretty then and it won't be pretty this next time either!
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-9f2c8a63d4a84eeaa7c8018d0367c6b7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: will you be annoyed when some turban headed freak blows up your plane? thats what i thought.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-6d4f15ce750d4ac8b91ba8173dde17d4 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Begich is the worst person to be giving Gov. Walker advice. As mayor of Anchorage Begich grew the Anchorage operating budget from $294 million in 2003 to $422 million when he left in 2009.
Vetoing the state budget results in all state employees being given lay off notices just weeks before the new fiscal year. That would be divisive and stupid.
Begich also calls for new taxes and a raid on the Permanent Fund which are both recessionary. Begich was missing in action when we were having a statewide debate on SB-21- which is mostly responsible for the massive deficits we have today. But nowhere in this article does Begich mention the fiasco of how we give away almost $10 billion in oil per year for only the royalty payment due to SB-21.
Finally, Begich gave us the disaster that is ACA- and its crippling insurance costs.
Begich needs to go away. He failed Alaska multiple times.
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-67383cbe4b2e4d09bb5d978061759490 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: I am sure Scalia's legacy will be morphed into a religious zealot, rather than extremely brilliant man that he was. Just like how Nelson Mandella who admittedly was a terrorist, has now been branded a hero.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-b9cfca423dce414e8602bb8728fe4eec |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: WE--GOT FRESH-powder snow here and need to make myself---eskimo snow-goggles---hardly anymore darkness at night also---that time of year !!!!
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-ededed7216f74b13ab4d922048700465 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Mr. Meek had to write a column on the Super Bowl today. It's part of his job. He did it as well as "the athlete who "answers every question," ". Just not as exciting.
Output:
| [
"Yes"
] | task1722-14d1a476b1a14ff289040b75aaee5de7 |
Definition: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
Positive Example 1 -
Input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Output: Yes
Positive Example 2 -
Input: Perfect analysis and statements.
Output: No
Negative Example 1 -
Input: Yet call out all Muslims for the acts of a few will get you pilloried. So why is it okay to smear an entire religion over these few idiots? Or is this because it's okay to bash Christian sects?
Output: Yes
Negative Example 2 -
Input: It's ridiculous that these guys are being called 'protesters'. Being armed is a threat of violence, which makes them terrorists
Output: Yes
Now complete the following example -
Input: Jules Bailey and the Portland Association of Teachers support mayor Hales’ refusal to allow the people, the Press, other elected officials and candidates for public office access to meaningful, accurate, complete and timely PUBLIC* and AFFORDABLE** Housing Statistical Data.
Jules Bailey and the Portland Association of Teachers support mayor Hales and the city council’s deliberate misuse of language to confuse voters and taxpayers by calling all “PUBLIC”* housing “AFFORDABLE”** housing.
Jules Bailey and the Portland Association of Teachers oppose the HUD favored policy of Equitable Distribution of Public Housing clients.
*
PUBLIC HOUSING is a class of housing defined as, Means Test (<=80%MFI) + Government Subsidy (any government any type) + rental agreement.
**
AFFORDABLE HOUSING is a mathematical construct defined as, Rent/Mortgage + Insurance + Taxes + Utilities <=30% Household Income. EVERY house, condo and apartment is AFFORDABLE to someone.
2 of 5
Output:
| [
"No"
] | task1722-21af34c7f4894b3fb00fe02b676560d8 |