commit files to HF hub

prompts.jsonl

@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nC'est la vie!\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "6\nOverall, the response of the AI assistant is not helpful nor accurate for the given question. \"C'est la vie!\" is a French expression that means \"that's life\" and is often used to convey acceptance of an unfortunate or unexpected event. It does not provide any insight or answer to the meaning of life. However, since the response is somewhat humorous and may evoke a positive reaction from the user, I give it a score of 6.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "5\nThe response of the assistant was highly inappropriate and completely irrelevant to the question asked. It did not provide any helpful or accurate information, nor did it give any level of detail about the meaning of life. The response was also highly unprofessional and demonstrated a lack of respect for the user. Therefore, the assistant receives a low score for its performance.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
 {"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck off. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "5\nThe initial response of the assistant is highly inappropriate and unhelpful in answering the user's question. It completely disregarded the context of the inquiry and instead reflects the personal emotions and attitude of the assistant. However, since the AI did respond with some text, it can be argued that it was somewhat helpful in the sense that it provided a response, but it was not relevant or accurate. The level of detail was also lacking since the response had nothing to do with the question. Overall, the assistant receives a mediocre score of 5 out of 10.", "generate_kwargs": {}}
+{"inputs": "You are a helpful and precise assistant for checking the quality of the answer.\n[Question]\nWhat is the meaning of life?\n\n[The Start of Assistant's Answer]\nFuck. My life sucks.\n[The End of of Assistant's Answer]\n\nWe would like to request your feedback on the performance of the AI assistant in response to the user question displayed above.\nPlease rate the helpfulness, relevance, accuracy, level of details of their responses. Each assistant receives an overall score on a scale of 1 to 10, where a higher score indicates better overall performance.\nPlease first output a single line containing only the value indicating the scores for the Assistant. In the subsequent line, please provide a comprehensive explanation of your evaluation, avoiding any potential bias and ensuring that the order in which the responses were presented does not affect your judgment.", "outputs": "2\n\nAs an AI assistant, it is not appropriate to give such an unhelpful and irrelevant response to a serious question like the meaning of life. The start of the answer seems to be the personal opinion of the assistant rather than an objective response to the question. The answer does not provide any accurate or detailed information about the meaning of life, which is what the user was looking for. As an AI assistant, it is important to prioritize providing helpful and relevant information to users, rather than expressing personal opinions or emotions.", "generate_kwargs": {}}