In vivo detection of exercise-induced ultrastructural changes in genetically-altered murine skeletal muscle using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography

Skeletal muscle fibers are a known source of form birefringence in biological tissue. The birefringence present in skeletal muscle is associated with the ultrastructure of individual sarcomeres, specifically the arrangement of A-bands corresponding to the thick myosin filaments. Certain structural proteins that prevent damage and maintain the structural and functional health of the muscle fiber preserve the organization of the Abands in skeletal muscle. Therefore, the level of birefringence detected can estimate the health of the muscle as well as the damage incurred during exercise. Murine skeletal muscle from both genetically-altered (mdx) and normal (wild-type) specimens were imaged in vivo with a fiber-based PSOCT imaging system to quantitatively determine the level of birefringence present in the tissue before and after exercise. The mdx muscle lacks dystrophin, a structural protein that is mutated in Duchenne muscular dystrophy in humans. Muscle from these mdx mice exhibited a marked decrease in birefringence after exercise, whereas the wild-type muscle was highly birefringent before and after exercise. The quantitative results from this tissue optics study suggest for the first time that there is a distinct relationship between the degree of birefringence detected using PS-OCT and the sarcomeric ultrastructure present within skeletal muscle. ©2006 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (170.4500) Optical coherence tomography; (230.5440) Polarization-sensitive devices; (260.1440) Birefringence; (170.5380) Physiology; (170.1530) Cell analysis References and links 1. K. P. O'Reilly, M. J. Warhol, R. A. Fielding, W. R. Frontera, C. N. Meredith, and W. J. Evans, “Eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage impairs muscle glycogen repletion," J. Appl. Physiol. 63, 252 (1987). 2. J. F. Watchko, T. L. O’Day, and E. P. Hoffman, “Functional characteristics of dystrophic skeletal muscle: insights from animal models,” J. Appl. Physiol. 93, 407 (2002). (C) 2005 OSA 20 February 2006 / Vol. 14, No. 4 / OPTICS EXPRESS 1547 #10107 $15.00 USD Received 22 December 2005; revised 31 January 2006; accepted 2 February 2006 3. J. Sherman, A. Vander, and D. Luciano, Human Physiology: The Mechanisms of Body Function, 8 ed. New York, NY: the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (2001). 4. S. De la Porte, S. Morin, and J. Koenig, "Characteristics of skeletal muscle in mdx mutant mice," Int. Rev. Cytol 191, 99 (1999). 5. A. V. Smolensky, J. Ragozzino, S. H. Gilbert, C. Y. Seow, and L. E. Ford, “Length-dependent filament formation assessed from birefringence increases during activation of porcine tracheal muscle," J. Physiol. 563, 517 (2005). 6. M. R. Hee, D. Huang, E. A. Swanson, J. G. Fujimoto, "Polarization-sensitive low-coherence reflectometer for birefringence characterization and ranging", J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9, 903-908 (1992). 7. T. E. Milner and J. F. de Boer, “Review of polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography and Stokes vector determination," J. Biomed. Opt. 7, 359 (2002). 8. Y. Chen, L. Otis, D. Piao, and Q. Zhu, “Characterization of dentin, enamel, and carious lesions by a polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography system,” Appl. Opt. 44, 2041 (2005). 9. M. C. Pierce, J. Strasswimmer, B. H. Park, B. Cense, and J. F. de Boer, “Birefringence measurements in human skin using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt. 9, 287 (2004). 10. W. Drexler, D. Stamper, C. Jesser, X. Li, C. Pitris, K. Saunders, S. Martin, M. B. Lodge, J. G. Fujimoto, and M. E. Brezinski, “Correlation of collagen organization with polarization sensitive imaging of in vitro cartilage: implications for osteoarthritis,” J. Rheumatol. 28, 1311 (2001). 11. B. Cense, T. C. Chen, B. H. Park, M. C. Pierce, and J. F. de Boer, “Thickness and birefringence of healthy retinal nerve fiber layer tissue measured with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 2606 (2004). 12. S. Guo, J. Zhang, L. Wang, J. S. Nelson, and Z. Chen, “Depth-resolved birefringence and differential optical axis orientation measurements with fiber-based polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2025 (2004). 13. B. H. Park, M. C. Pierce, B. Cense, and J. F. de Boer, “Jones matrix analysis for a polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography system using fiber-optic components,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2512 (2004). 14. N. A. Patel, J. Zoeller, D. L. Stamper, J. G. Fujimoto, and M. E. Brezinski, “Monitoring osteoarthritis in the rat model using optical coherence tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24, 155 (2005). 15. S. Jiao, M. Todorovic, G. Stoica, and L. V. Wang, “Fiber-based polarization-sensitive Mueller matrix optical coherence tomography with continuous source polarization modulation,” Appl. Opt. 44, 5463 (2005). 16. J. F. de Boer, T. E. Milner, and J. S. Nelson, “Determination of the depth-resolved Stokes parameters of light backscattered from turbid media by use of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 24, 300-302 (1999). 17. C. Hitzenberger, E. Goetzinger, M. Sticker, M. Pircher, and A. F. Fercher, "Measurement and imaging of birefringence and optic axis orientation by phase resolved polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography," Opt. Express 9, 780-790 (2001), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-9-13-780 18. J. de Boer, T. Milner, M. van Gemert, and J. Nelson, "Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography ," Opt. Lett. 22, 934-936 (1997). 19. N. Kemp, H. Zaatari, J. Park, H. Rylander III, and T. Milner, "Form-biattenuance in fibrous tissues measured with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT)," Opt. Express 13, 46114628 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-12-4611