[DOC] [TLE] Police Use of Deadly Force: State Statutes 30 Years after Garner ... [PAR] Jan 15, 2016 ... States can say officers are never authorized to use deadly force, ... had the 
common law rule in 1985, approaching but not quite a majority. ... police officer 
use of force (approved by the Missouri Supreme Court) .... If the suspect poses no 
immediate threat to the officers or others, deadly force cannot be used. [DOC] [TLE] Court Curbs Police Shootings : Rules They Can't Fire at Unarmed ... [PAR] Mar 27, 1985 ... The Supreme Court ruled today that police may not shoot unarmed suspects ... 
when there is no apparent threat of harm to police officers or others. ... "Where the 
suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no ... him does not justify the 
use of deadly force to do so," White said. ... March 28, 1985... [DOC] [TLE] Column: Police Use of Force, the Constitution and the New NYPD ... [PAR] Aug 5, 2016 ... Across the country, all police use of force is subject to federal ... Two Supreme 
Court cases from the 1980s establish the federal ... Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). ... 
no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm resulting ... 
And under Garner, deadly physical force cannot be used unless the... [DOC] [TLE] When can police use lethal force against a fleeing suspect? | PBS ... [PAR] Apr 8, 2015 ... The law gives police officers latitude to use deadly force when they feel ... A 
seminal 1985 Supreme Court case, Tennessee vs. ... unless the person being 
chased is seen as an immediate safety risk. ... But if the stun gun was on the 
ground at the time Scott fled, Drago said, then there is no longer a threat. [DOC] [TLE] When can police use deadly force if a suspect flees? - CNN.com [PAR] Apr 10, 2015 ... "Unless the fleeing felon is a substantial risk to the life of the police ... The U.S. 
Supreme Court limited the police use of deadly force ... Where the suspect poses 
no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm ... It's a 
complex question, and there are many ways to answer it, Root said. [DOC] [TLE] Why It's Impossible to Indict a Cop | The Nation [PAR] Nov 25, 2014 ... This standard originates in the 1985 case of Tennessee v. ... The US Supreme 
Court ruled that a police officer, henceforth, could use deadly force only if ... The 
ruling required that the use of force be objectively reasonable. ... whether the 
suspect posed an immediate threat to the safety of officers or others. [DOC] [TLE] KING: Why we must take police brutality to the Supreme Court - NY ... [PAR] Aug 11, 2016 ... If the law says these high-profile police killings were reasonable, then that law 
needs to change. ... Garner (1985) U.S. Supreme Court ... Where the suspect 
poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm ... The 
Supreme Court determined that "reasonable use of force" by an officer... [DOC] [TLE] What was the legal basis for the use of a robot delivered bomb ... [PAR] I'll have to respectfully disagree with Caitlin Scallan on a few points  in 
Tennessee v. Garner ... Garner and other decisions, the Supreme Court has 
made it abundantl. ... Was there a legitimate concern the suspect might escape? 
... law using deadly force in self-dense, the harm must be imminent, not a threat of 
future harm,... [DOC] [TLE] Here's why police don't shoot to wound in the case of deadly force [PAR] Sep 21, 2016 ... "There is no way an officer can react, track, shoot and reliably hit a threatening ... 
A 1985 U.S. Supreme Court ruling struck down policies that allowed officers to ... 
The court ruled that a suspect has to be posing an immediate threat of ... In 1989, 
the court went further saying officers can use deadly force if it is... [DOC] [TLE] Vehicular Assault - Fight or Flight

Question: In 1985 the Supreme Court said the police can't use this "force" unless there's a threat of immediate harm
Answer: deadly force