[DOC] [TLE] Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia [PAR] Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857), also known simply as the Dred Scott 
case, was a ... The decision was only the second time that the Supreme Court 
had ruled an Act ... entering Louisiana, the Scotts could have sued for their 
freedom, but did not. .... because as a descendant of African slaves, Scott was not 
a citizen. [DOC] [TLE] Dred Scott | HistoryNet [PAR] The 1857 decision by the United States Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case ... 
Scott met and married a slave named Harriet Robinson, and her ownership was 
transferred to Emerson. ... Scott's race he was not a citizen and had no right to 
sue under the Constitution. ... Dred Scott did not get to enjoy his freedom very 
long. [DOC] [TLE] The Supreme Court . The First Hundred Years . Landmark Cases ... [PAR] The Court's decision in Dred Scott v. ... Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), 
the Supreme Court ruled that ... The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power 
to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. ... The jury ruled that Scott could not sue in 
federal court because he had already been deemed a slave under Missouri law. [DOC] [TLE] The Dred Scott Decision - Digital History [PAR] In 1846, a Missouri slave, Dred Scott, sued for his freedom. ... Then, in March 
1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney announced the Court's decision. By a 7-2 
margin, the Court ruled that Dred Scott had no right to sue in federal court, that ... 
an Illinois politician named Abraham Lincoln--regarded the decision as part of a 
slave... [DOC] [TLE] Our Documents - Transcript of Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) [PAR] Congress have no right to prohibit the citizens of any particular State or ... The 
Constitution of the United States recognises slaves as property, and pledges the 
Federal ... It has been settled by the decisions of the highest court in Missouri, 
that by ... named in the second count of the plaintiff's declaration, was the negro 
slave... [DOC] [TLE] THE DRED SCOTT CASE - ChickenBones [PAR] The court also ruled that slaves were not citizens of any state nor of the United 
States. ... to the Circuit Court, where it was continued to await the decision of the 
case ... is named in the second count of the plaintiff's declaration, was the negro 
slave of ... in the Constitution, and did not have the right to sue in any federal 
court. [DOC] [TLE] Missouri Digital Heritage: Dred Scott Case, 1846-1857 [PAR] Once the bonds of slavery were broken, they did not reattach. ... His parents may 
have been the property of Peter Blow, or Blow may have purchased Scott at a 
later date. ... On June 30, 1847, Henry Taylor Blow testified in Dred Scott's circuit 
court trial ... first chance to sue for his freedom, assuming he knew he had that 
right. [DOC] [TLE] Scott v. Sandford | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute [PAR] The decision, therefore, that the judgment of the Circuit Court upon the plea in ... 
Congress have no right to prohibit the citizens of any particular State or States 
from ... of the United States recognises slaves as property, and pledges the 
Federal .... named in the second count of the plaintiff's declaration, was the negro 
slave of... [DOC] [TLE] The US Supreme Court's, Dred Scott Decision -- Courtesy of The ... [PAR] Read Abraham Lincoln's response to the Dred Scott decision ... Into this charged 
atmosphere stepped a black slave from Missouri named Dred Scott. .... 1857, it 
favored a moderate decision that ruled in favor of Sanford but did not consider ... 
as a Negro, did not even have the privilege of being able to sue in a federal court. [DOC] [TLE] Dred Scott decision [PAR] Taney did not have a ... In the year 1834, the plaintiff was a negro slave 
belonging to Dr. Emerson, who ... might lawfully do if they were of right his slaves 
at such times. ... they are

Question: The 1857 decision named for this plaintiff ruled that slaves did not have the right to sue in federal courts
Answer: Dred Scott