[DOC] [TLE] Schenck v. United States - Wikipedia [PAR] Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), is a United States Supreme Court 
case concerning enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 during World War I. A 
unanimous Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, ... In 
this opinion, Holmes said that expressions which in the circumstances were... [DOC] [TLE] 07 - Regents Prep US History & Government: Multiple-Choice ... [PAR] The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely 
shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic." -Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes... [DOC] [TLE] Schenck v. United States | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute [PAR] JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. ... According to the 
testimony, Schenck said he was general secretary of the Socialist party ... The 
most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely 
shouting fire in a... [DOC] [TLE] falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater - Definition, pictures ... [PAR] ... in 1919 by the US Supreme Court judge Oliver Wendell Holmes to show that in 
... free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and... [DOC] [TLE] It's Time to Stop Using the 'Fire in a Crowded Theater' Quote - The ... [PAR] Nov 2, 2012 ... Oliver Wendell Holmes made the analogy during a controversial ... protection of 
free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a ... It said, "Do not 
submit to intimidation," but in form, at least, confined itself to... [DOC] [TLE] A Reminder About Shouting 'Fire' in a Crowded Theater - FIRE [PAR] Mar 16, 2015 ... ... stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting 
... Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote these words in the context of a 1919 ... It 
said, Do not submit to intimidation, but in form, at least, confined itself to ... I 
would wager that most people throwing around the fire in a theater... [DOC] [TLE] 'Shouting Fire In A Theater': Law's Most Enduring Analogy - ValueWalk [PAR] Jul 25, 2015 ... In 1919, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes introduced the specter of a man falsely 
shouting fire in a theater into First Amendment law. ... as has often been said; but 
if he cries 'fire' in a crowded theater, with the intent to injure the... [DOC] [TLE] Even Speech We Hate Should Be Free - WSJ [PAR] Aug 21, 2015 ... There is no right, the opiner will say, to shout fire in a crowded theater! ... The 
most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely 
shouting fire ... Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in 1932 Photo: ASSOCIATED 
PRESS ... Finally, in any case, the fire-in-a-theater comparison was always... [DOC] [TLE] Things Oliver Wendell Holmes Didn't Say | Above the Law [PAR] Mar 25, 2013 ... You know what Oliver Wendell Holmes didn't say? Free speech would not 
protect a man in falsely shouting 'BINGO! .... It is still good law, but it didn't "outlaw
" falsely shouting fire in a theater, you just don;t have criminal or civil... [DOC] [TLE] Shouting 'Fire' in a Theater - William & Mary Law School Scholarship ... [PAR] In 1919, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes introduced the specter of a man falsely ... 
protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a 
theatre ... said; but if he cries 'fire' in a crowded theater, with the intent to injure the
... [DOC] [TLE] Falsely Shouting Fire in a Theater: How a Forgotten Labor Struggle ... [PAR] Feb 17, 2013 ... That image was first offered by Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes as 
an ... however, for the gap between what Schenck did and what Holmes said he 
did is ... protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire 
... In the same way that a person's shout of fire in a theater would... [DOC] [TLE] fire in a crowded theater - | National Review [PAR]

Question: Oliver Wendell Holmes said, "Free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting" this "in a theater"
Answer: "Fire!"