Datasets:

JamBelg

/

Argilla_prompt_llm

like 0

IDENTIFYING DATA: ,The patient is a 35-year-old Caucasian female who speaks English.,CHIEF COMPLAINT: ,The patient has a manic disorder, is presently psychotic with flight of ideas, believes, "I can fly," tangential speech, rapid pressured speech and behavior, impulsive behavior. Last night, she tried to turn on the garbage disposal and put her hand in it, in the apartment shared by her husband. She then turned on the oven and put her head in the oven and then tried to climb over the second storied balcony. All of these behaviors were interrupted by her husband who called 911. He reports that she has not slept in 3 to 5 days and has not taken her meds in at least that time period.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: ,The patient was treated most recently at ABCD Hospital and decompensated during that admission resulting in her 90-day LR being revoked. After leaving ABCD approximately 01/25/2010, she stopped taking her Abilify and lithium. Her husband states that he restrained her from jumping, "so she would not kill herself," and this was taken as a statement in his affidavit. The patient was taken to X Hospital, medically cleared, given Ativan 2 mg p.o. and transferred on an involuntary status to XYZ Hospital. She arrives here and is today pacing on the unit and in and out of the large TV room area. She is friendly towards the patients although sometimes raises her voice and comes too close to other patients in a rapid manner. She is highly tangential, delusional, and disorganized. She refused to sign all admit papers and a considerable part of her immediate history is unknown.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: ,The patient was last admitted to XYZ Hospital on January 14, 2009, and discharged on January 23, 2009. Please see the excellent discharge summary of Dr. X regarding this admission for information, which the patient is unable to give at the present. She is currently treated by Dr. Y. She has been involuntarily detained at least 7 times and revoked at least 6 times. She was on XYZ Inpatient in 2001 and in 01/2009. She states that she "feels invincible" when she becomes manic and this is also the description given by her husband.,MEDICAL HISTORY: ,The patient has a history of a herniated disc in 1999.,MEDICATIONS: , Current meds, which are her outpatient meds, which she is not taking at the moment are lithium 300 mg p.o. AM and 600 mg p.o. q.p.m., Abilify 15 mg p.o. per day, Lyrica 100 mg p.o. per day, it is not clear if she is taking Geodon as the record is conflicting in this regard. She is being given Vicodin, is not sure who the prescriber for that medication is and it is presumably due to her history of herniated disc. Of note, she also has a history of abusing Vicodin.,ALLERGIES: ,Said to be PENICILLIN, LAMICTAL, and ZYPREXA.,SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: , The patient lives with her husband. There are no children. She reportedly has a college education and has 2 brothers.,SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL HISTORY: , Per ABCD information, the patient has a history of abusing opiates, benzodiazepines, and Vicodin. The X Hospital tox screen of last night was positive for opiates. Her lithium level per last night at X Hospital was 0.42 mEq/L. She smokes nicotine, the amount is not known although she has asked and received Nicorette gum.,LEGAL HISTORY: , She had a 90-day LR, which was revoked at ABCD Hospital, 12/ 25/2009, when she quickly deteriorated.,MENTAL STATUS EXAM:,ATTITUDE: ,The patient's attitude is agitated when asked questions, loud and evasive.,APPEARANCE:, Disheveled and moderately well nourished.,PSYCHOMOTOR: , Restless with erratic sudden movements.,EPS:, None.,AFFECT: , Hyperactive, hostile, and labile.,MOOD: , Her mood is agitated, suspicious, and angry.,SPEECH: ,Circumstantial and sometimes intelligible when asked simple direct questions and at other points becomes completely tangential describing issues which are not real.,THOUGHT CONTENT: , Delusional, disorganized, psychotic, and paranoid. Suicidal ideation, the patient refuses to answer the questions, but the record shows a past history of suicide attempt.,COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT: ,The patient was said on her nursing admit to be oriented to place and person, but could not answer that question for me, and appeared to think that she may still be at ABCD Hospital. Her recent, intermediate, and remote memory are impaired although there is a lack of cooperation in this testing.,JUDGMENT AND INSIGHT:, Nil. When asked, are there situations when you lose control, she refuses to answer. When asked, are meds helpful, she refuses to answer. She refuses to give her family information nor release of information to contact them.,ASSETS:, The patient has an outpatient psychiatrist and she does better or is more stable when taking her medications.,LIMITATIONS:, The patient goes off her medications routinely, behaves unsafely and in a potentially suicidal manner.,FORMULATION,: The patient has bipolar affective disorder in a manic state at present. She also may be depressed and is struggling with marital issues.,DIAGNOSES:

identifying data patient yearold caucasian female speaks englishchief complaint patient manic disorder presently psychotic flight ideas believes fly tangential speech rapid pressured speech behavior impulsive behavior last night tried turn garbage disposal put hand apartment shared husband turned oven put head oven tried climb second storied balcony behaviors interrupted husband called reports slept days taken meds least time periodhistory present illness patient treated recently abcd hospital decompensated admission resulting day lr revoked leaving abcd approximately stopped taking abilify lithium husband states restrained jumping would kill taken statement affidavit patient taken x hospital medically cleared given ativan mg po transferred involuntary status xyz hospital arrives today pacing unit large tv room area friendly towards patients although sometimes raises voice comes close patients rapid manner highly tangential delusional disorganized refused sign admit papers considerable part immediate history unknownpast psychiatric history patient last admitted xyz hospital january discharged january please see excellent discharge summary dr x regarding admission information patient unable give present currently treated dr involuntarily detained least times revoked least times xyz inpatient states feels invincible becomes manic also description given husbandmedical history patient history herniated disc medications current meds outpatient meds taking moment lithium mg po mg po qpm abilify mg po per day lyrica mg po per day clear taking geodon record conflicting regard given vicodin sure prescriber medication presumably due history herniated disc note also history abusing vicodinallergies said penicillin lamictal zyprexasocial developmental history patient lives husband children reportedly college education brotherssubstance alcohol history per abcd information patient history abusing opiates benzodiazepines vicodin x hospital tox screen last night positive opiates lithium level per last night x hospital meql smokes nicotine amount known although asked received nicorette gumlegal history day lr revoked abcd hospital quickly deterioratedmental status examattitude patients attitude agitated asked questions loud evasiveappearance disheveled moderately well nourishedpsychomotor restless erratic sudden movementseps noneaffect hyperactive hostile labilemood mood agitated suspicious angryspeech circumstantial sometimes intelligible asked simple direct questions points becomes completely tangential describing issues realthought content delusional disorganized psychotic paranoid suicidal ideation patient refuses answer questions record shows past history suicide attemptcognitive assessment patient said nursing admit oriented place person could answer question appeared think may still abcd hospital recent intermediate remote memory impaired although lack cooperation testingjudgment insight nil asked situations lose control refuses answer asked meds helpful refuses answer refuses give family information release information contact themassets patient outpatient psychiatrist better stable taking medicationslimitations patient goes medications routinely behaves unsafely potentially suicidal mannerformulation patient bipolar affective disorder manic state present also may depressed struggling marital issuesdiagnoses

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA: ,The patient is a 35-year-old Caucasian female who speaks English.,CHIEF COMPLAINT: ,The patient has a manic disorder, is presently psychotic with flight of ideas, believes, "I can fly," tangential speech, rapid pressured speech and behavior, impulsive behavior. Last night, she tried to turn on the garbage disposal and put her hand in it, in the apartment shared by her husband. She then turned on the oven and put her head in the oven and then tried to climb over the second storied balcony. All of these behaviors were interrupted by her husband who called 911. He reports that she has not slept in 3 to 5 days and has not taken her meds in at least that time period.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: ,The patient was treated most recently at ABCD Hospital and decompensated during that admission resulting in her 90-day LR being revoked. After leaving ABCD approximately 01/25/2010, she stopped taking her Abilify and lithium. Her husband states that he restrained her from jumping, "so she would not kill herself," and this was taken as a statement in his affidavit. The patient was taken to X Hospital, medically cleared, given Ativan 2 mg p.o. and transferred on an involuntary status to XYZ Hospital. She arrives here and is today pacing on the unit and in and out of the large TV room area. She is friendly towards the patients although sometimes raises her voice and comes too close to other patients in a rapid manner. She is highly tangential, delusional, and disorganized. She refused to sign all admit papers and a considerable part of her immediate history is unknown.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: ,The patient was last admitted to XYZ Hospital on January 14, 2009, and discharged on January 23, 2009. Please see the excellent discharge summary of Dr. X regarding this admission for information, which the patient is unable to give at the present. She is currently treated by Dr. Y. She has been involuntarily detained at least 7 times and revoked at least 6 times. She was on XYZ Inpatient in 2001 and in 01/2009. She states that she "feels invincible" when she becomes manic and this is also the description given by her husband.,MEDICAL HISTORY: ,The patient has a history of a herniated disc in 1999.,MEDICATIONS: , Current meds, which are her outpatient meds, which she is not taking at the moment are lithium 300 mg p.o. AM and 600 mg p.o. q.p.m., Abilify 15 mg p.o. per day, Lyrica 100 mg p.o. per day, it is not clear if she is taking Geodon as the record is conflicting in this regard. She is being given Vicodin, is not sure who the prescriber for that medication is and it is presumably due to her history of herniated disc. Of note, she also has a history of abusing Vicodin.,ALLERGIES: ,Said to be PENICILLIN, LAMICTAL, and ZYPREXA.,SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: , The patient lives with her husband. There are no children. She reportedly has a college education and has 2 brothers.,SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL HISTORY: , Per ABCD information, the patient has a history of abusing opiates, benzodiazepines, and Vicodin. The X Hospital tox screen of last night was positive for opiates. Her lithium level per last night at X Hospital was 0.42 mEq/L. She smokes nicotine, the amount is not known although she has asked and received Nicorette gum.,LEGAL HISTORY: , She had a 90-day LR, which was revoked at ABCD Hospital, 12/ 25/2009, when she quickly deteriorated.,MENTAL STATUS EXAM:,ATTITUDE: ,The patient's attitude is agitated when asked questions, loud and evasive.,APPEARANCE:, Disheveled and moderately well nourished.,PSYCHOMOTOR: , Restless with erratic sudden movements.,EPS:, None.,AFFECT: , Hyperactive, hostile, and labile.,MOOD: , Her mood is agitated, suspicious, and angry.,SPEECH: ,Circumstantial and sometimes intelligible when asked simple direct questions and at other points becomes completely tangential describing issues which are not real.,THOUGHT CONTENT: , Delusional, disorganized, psychotic, and paranoid. Suicidal ideation, the patient refuses to answer the questions, but the record shows a past history of suicide attempt.,COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT: ,The patient was said on her nursing admit to be oriented to place and person, but could not answer that question for me, and appeared to think that she may still be at ABCD Hospital. Her recent, intermediate, and remote memory are impaired although there is a lack of cooperation in this testing.,JUDGMENT AND INSIGHT:, Nil. When asked, are there situations when you lose control, she refuses to answer. When asked, are meds helpful, she refuses to answer. She refuses to give her family information nor release of information to contact them.,ASSETS:, The patient has an outpatient psychiatrist and she does better or is more stable when taking her medications.,LIMITATIONS:, The patient goes off her medications routinely, behaves unsafely and in a potentially suicidal manner.,FORMULATION,: The patient has bipolar affective disorder in a manic state at present. She also may be depressed and is struggling with marital issues.,DIAGNOSES: ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

IDENTIFYING DATA: ,The patient is a 40-year-old white male. He is married, on medical leave from his job as a tree cutter, and lives with his wife and five children.,CHIEF COMPLAINT AND REACTION TO HOSPITALIZATION: ,The patient is admitted on a 72-hour involuntary treatment for dangerousness to others after repeated assaultive behaviors at Hospital Emergency Room, the morning prior to admission.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: ,The patient was very sleepy this morning, only minimally cooperative with interview. Additional information taken from the emergency room records that accompanied him from Hospital yesterday as well as from his wife, who I contacted by telephone. The patient was apparently at his stable baseline when discharged from the Hospital on 01/21/10, status post back surgery following a work-related injury. The patient returned to Emergency Room on the evening prior to admission complaining of severe back pain. His ER course is notable for yelling, spitting, and striking multiple staff members. The patient was originally to be admitted for pain control, but when he threatened to leave, he was referred to MHPs, who subsequently detained him for 72 hours for dangerousness to others. On interview, the patient reports only hazy memories of these incidences and states this behavior was secondary to his pain and his medications. He was contrite about the violence. When his wife was contacted by telephone, she agreed with this assessment and reports that he has a history of domestic violence usually in the setting of alcohol and illicit substance intoxication, but denies any events in the last 3 years.,His wife reports that after discharge from the hospital, on 01/21/10, he was prescribed Percocet, Soma, hydroxyzine, and Valium. He essentially exhausted his approximately 10 days' supply of these agents on the morning of 01/23/10, and as above believes that this was responsible for his presentation yesterday. She reports that she has been in contact with him since his arrival in our facility and reports that he is "back to normal." She denies feeling that he currently represents a threat to her or her five children. She was unaware of his mental health history, but denies that he has received care for any condition since they were married three years ago.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , The patient has a history of Involuntary Treatment Act of 72 hours in our facility in 2004 or 2005 for assaultive behaviors; however, these records are not currently available for review. The patient denies any outpatient mental health treatment before or since this hospitalization. He describes his mental health diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder; however, he denies a history of dramatic mood swings in the absence of illicit substances or alcohol intoxication.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, Notable for status post back surgery, discharged from Hospital on 01/21/10.,MEDICATIONS:, From discharge from Hospital on 01/21/10, include Percocet, Valium, Soma, and Vistaril, doses and frequency are not currently known. His wife reports that he was discharged with approximately 10 days' supply of these agents.,SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: ,The patient is employed as a tree cutter, currently on medical leave for the last 2 months following a back injury. He lives with his wife and children. He has a history of domestic violence, but not recently. Other details of occupational, educational history not currently known.,SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL HISTORY:, Records indicate a previous history of methamphetamine and alcohol abuse/dependence. The wife states that he has not consumed either since 12/07. Of note, urine tox screen at Hospital was positive for marijuana.,LEGAL HISTORY: ,The patient has been charged with domestic violence in the past, but his wife denies any repeat instances since in the last 3 years. It is not known whether the patient is currently on probation.,GENETIC PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , Unknown.,MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION:,Attitude: The patient is only minimally cooperative with interview secondary to being sleepy, and after repeated attempts to ask questions, he rolled over and went to bed.,Appearance: He is unkempt and there are multiple visible tattoos on his biceps.,Psychomotor: There is no obvious psychomotor agitation or retardation. There are no obvious extrapyramidal symptoms of tardive dyskinesia.,Affect: His affect is notably restricted probably due to the fact that he is sleepy.,Mood: Describes his mood as "okay.",Speech: Speech is normal rate, volume, and tone.,Thought Processes: His thought processes appear to be linear.,Thought Content: His thought content is notable for his expressions of contrition about violence at Hospital last night. He denies suicidal or homicidal ideation.,Cognitive Assessment: Cognitively, he is alert and oriented to person, place, and date but not situation. Attributes this to not really remembering the events at Hospital that resulted in this hospitalization.,Judgment and Insight: His insight and judgment are both appear to be improving.,Assets: Include his supportive wife and the fact he has been able to remain alcohol and methamphetamine sobriety for the last 3 years.,Limitations: Include his back injury and possible need for improvement of health treatment engagement.,FORMULATION: ,This is a 40-year-old white male, who was admitted for an acute agitation in the setting of misuse of prescribed opiates, Soma, hydroxyzine, and Valium. He appears much improved from his condition at Hospital last night and I suspect that his behavior is most likely attributed to delirium and this since resolved. He reports historical diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder, however, the details of this diagnosis are not currently available for review.,DIAGNOSES:,AXIS I: Delirium, resolved (recent mental status changes likely secondary to misuse of prescribed opiates, Soma, Valium, and hydroxyzine.) Rule out bipolar affective disorder.,AXIS II: Deferred.,AXIS III: Chronic pain status post back surgery.,AXIS IV: Appears to be moderate. He is currently on medical leave from his job.,AXIS V: Global Assessment of Functioning is currently 50 (his GAF was 20 approximately 24 hours ago).,ESTIMATED LENGTH OF STAY:, Three days.,PLAN:, I will hold psychiatric medications for now given the patient's fairly rapid improvement as he cleared from the condition, I suspect is likely due to misuse of prescribed medications. The patient will be placed on CIWA protocol given that one of the medications he overused was Valium. Of note, he does not currently appear to be withdrawing and I anticipate that his CIWA will be discontinued prior to discharge. I would like to increase the database regarding the details of his historical diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder before pursuing referrals for outpatient mental health care. The internal medicine service will evaluate for treatment for any underlying medical problems specifically to provide recommendations regarding pain management.

identifying data patient yearold white male married medical leave job tree cutter lives wife five childrenchief complaint reaction hospitalization patient admitted hour involuntary treatment dangerousness others repeated assaultive behaviors hospital emergency room morning prior admissionhistory present illness patient sleepy morning minimally cooperative interview additional information taken emergency room records accompanied hospital yesterday well wife contacted telephone patient apparently stable baseline discharged hospital status post back surgery following workrelated injury patient returned emergency room evening prior admission complaining severe back pain er course notable yelling spitting striking multiple staff members patient originally admitted pain control threatened leave referred mhps subsequently detained hours dangerousness others interview patient reports hazy memories incidences states behavior secondary pain medications contrite violence wife contacted telephone agreed assessment reports history domestic violence usually setting alcohol illicit substance intoxication denies events last yearshis wife reports discharge hospital prescribed percocet soma hydroxyzine valium essentially exhausted approximately days supply agents morning believes responsible presentation yesterday reports contact since arrival facility reports back normal denies feeling currently represents threat five children unaware mental health history denies received care condition since married three years agopast psychiatric history patient history involuntary treatment act hours facility assaultive behaviors however records currently available review patient denies outpatient mental health treatment since hospitalization describes mental health diagnosis bipolar affective disorder however denies history dramatic mood swings absence illicit substances alcohol intoxicationpast medical history notable status post back surgery discharged hospital medications discharge hospital include percocet valium soma vistaril doses frequency currently known wife reports discharged approximately days supply agentssocial developmental history patient employed tree cutter currently medical leave last months following back injury lives wife children history domestic violence recently details occupational educational history currently knownsubstance alcohol history records indicate previous history methamphetamine alcohol abusedependence wife states consumed either since note urine tox screen hospital positive marijuanalegal history patient charged domestic violence past wife denies repeat instances since last years known whether patient currently probationgenetic psychiatric history unknownmental status examinationattitude patient minimally cooperative interview secondary sleepy repeated attempts ask questions rolled went bedappearance unkempt multiple visible tattoos bicepspsychomotor obvious psychomotor agitation retardation obvious extrapyramidal symptoms tardive dyskinesiaaffect affect notably restricted probably due fact sleepymood describes mood okayspeech speech normal rate volume tonethought processes thought processes appear linearthought content thought content notable expressions contrition violence hospital last night denies suicidal homicidal ideationcognitive assessment cognitively alert oriented person place date situation attributes really remembering events hospital resulted hospitalizationjudgment insight insight judgment appear improvingassets include supportive wife fact able remain alcohol methamphetamine sobriety last yearslimitations include back injury possible need improvement health treatment engagementformulation yearold white male admitted acute agitation setting misuse prescribed opiates soma hydroxyzine valium appears much improved condition hospital last night suspect behavior likely attributed delirium since resolved reports historical diagnosis bipolar affective disorder however details diagnosis currently available reviewdiagnosesaxis delirium resolved recent mental status changes likely secondary misuse prescribed opiates soma valium hydroxyzine rule bipolar affective disorderaxis ii deferredaxis iii chronic pain status post back surgeryaxis iv appears moderate currently medical leave jobaxis v global assessment functioning currently gaf approximately hours agoestimated length stay three daysplan hold psychiatric medications given patients fairly rapid improvement cleared condition suspect likely due misuse prescribed medications patient placed ciwa protocol given one medications overused valium note currently appear withdrawing anticipate ciwa discontinued prior discharge would like increase database regarding details historical diagnosis bipolar affective disorder pursuing referrals outpatient mental health care internal medicine service evaluate treatment underlying medical problems specifically provide recommendations regarding pain management

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA: ,The patient is a 40-year-old white male. He is married, on medical leave from his job as a tree cutter, and lives with his wife and five children.,CHIEF COMPLAINT AND REACTION TO HOSPITALIZATION: ,The patient is admitted on a 72-hour involuntary treatment for dangerousness to others after repeated assaultive behaviors at Hospital Emergency Room, the morning prior to admission.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: ,The patient was very sleepy this morning, only minimally cooperative with interview. Additional information taken from the emergency room records that accompanied him from Hospital yesterday as well as from his wife, who I contacted by telephone. The patient was apparently at his stable baseline when discharged from the Hospital on 01/21/10, status post back surgery following a work-related injury. The patient returned to Emergency Room on the evening prior to admission complaining of severe back pain. His ER course is notable for yelling, spitting, and striking multiple staff members. The patient was originally to be admitted for pain control, but when he threatened to leave, he was referred to MHPs, who subsequently detained him for 72 hours for dangerousness to others. On interview, the patient reports only hazy memories of these incidences and states this behavior was secondary to his pain and his medications. He was contrite about the violence. When his wife was contacted by telephone, she agreed with this assessment and reports that he has a history of domestic violence usually in the setting of alcohol and illicit substance intoxication, but denies any events in the last 3 years.,His wife reports that after discharge from the hospital, on 01/21/10, he was prescribed Percocet, Soma, hydroxyzine, and Valium. He essentially exhausted his approximately 10 days' supply of these agents on the morning of 01/23/10, and as above believes that this was responsible for his presentation yesterday. She reports that she has been in contact with him since his arrival in our facility and reports that he is "back to normal." She denies feeling that he currently represents a threat to her or her five children. She was unaware of his mental health history, but denies that he has received care for any condition since they were married three years ago.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , The patient has a history of Involuntary Treatment Act of 72 hours in our facility in 2004 or 2005 for assaultive behaviors; however, these records are not currently available for review. The patient denies any outpatient mental health treatment before or since this hospitalization. He describes his mental health diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder; however, he denies a history of dramatic mood swings in the absence of illicit substances or alcohol intoxication.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, Notable for status post back surgery, discharged from Hospital on 01/21/10.,MEDICATIONS:, From discharge from Hospital on 01/21/10, include Percocet, Valium, Soma, and Vistaril, doses and frequency are not currently known. His wife reports that he was discharged with approximately 10 days' supply of these agents.,SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: ,The patient is employed as a tree cutter, currently on medical leave for the last 2 months following a back injury. He lives with his wife and children. He has a history of domestic violence, but not recently. Other details of occupational, educational history not currently known.,SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL HISTORY:, Records indicate a previous history of methamphetamine and alcohol abuse/dependence. The wife states that he has not consumed either since 12/07. Of note, urine tox screen at Hospital was positive for marijuana.,LEGAL HISTORY: ,The patient has been charged with domestic violence in the past, but his wife denies any repeat instances since in the last 3 years. It is not known whether the patient is currently on probation.,GENETIC PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , Unknown.,MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION:,Attitude: The patient is only minimally cooperative with interview secondary to being sleepy, and after repeated attempts to ask questions, he rolled over and went to bed.,Appearance: He is unkempt and there are multiple visible tattoos on his biceps.,Psychomotor: There is no obvious psychomotor agitation or retardation. There are no obvious extrapyramidal symptoms of tardive dyskinesia.,Affect: His affect is notably restricted probably due to the fact that he is sleepy.,Mood: Describes his mood as "okay.",Speech: Speech is normal rate, volume, and tone.,Thought Processes: His thought processes appear to be linear.,Thought Content: His thought content is notable for his expressions of contrition about violence at Hospital last night. He denies suicidal or homicidal ideation.,Cognitive Assessment: Cognitively, he is alert and oriented to person, place, and date but not situation. Attributes this to not really remembering the events at Hospital that resulted in this hospitalization.,Judgment and Insight: His insight and judgment are both appear to be improving.,Assets: Include his supportive wife and the fact he has been able to remain alcohol and methamphetamine sobriety for the last 3 years.,Limitations: Include his back injury and possible need for improvement of health treatment engagement.,FORMULATION: ,This is a 40-year-old white male, who was admitted for an acute agitation in the setting of misuse of prescribed opiates, Soma, hydroxyzine, and Valium. He appears much improved from his condition at Hospital last night and I suspect that his behavior is most likely attributed to delirium and this since resolved. He reports historical diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder, however, the details of this diagnosis are not currently available for review.,DIAGNOSES:,AXIS I: Delirium, resolved (recent mental status changes likely secondary to misuse of prescribed opiates, Soma, Valium, and hydroxyzine.) Rule out bipolar affective disorder.,AXIS II: Deferred.,AXIS III: Chronic pain status post back surgery.,AXIS IV: Appears to be moderate. He is currently on medical leave from his job.,AXIS V: Global Assessment of Functioning is currently 50 (his GAF was 20 approximately 24 hours ago).,ESTIMATED LENGTH OF STAY:, Three days.,PLAN:, I will hold psychiatric medications for now given the patient's fairly rapid improvement as he cleared from the condition, I suspect is likely due to misuse of prescribed medications. The patient will be placed on CIWA protocol given that one of the medications he overused was Valium. Of note, he does not currently appear to be withdrawing and I anticipate that his CIWA will be discontinued prior to discharge. I would like to increase the database regarding the details of his historical diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder before pursuing referrals for outpatient mental health care. The internal medicine service will evaluate for treatment for any underlying medical problems specifically to provide recommendations regarding pain management. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

IDENTIFYING DATA: , The patient is a 21-year-old Caucasian male, who attempted suicide by trying to jump from a moving car, which was being driven by his mother. Additionally, he totaled his own car earlier in the day, both of which occurrences occurred approximately 72 hours before arriving at ABCD Hospital. He says he had a "panic attack leading to the car wreck" and denies that any of his behavior was suicidal in nature responding, "I was just trying to scare my mother.",CHIEF COMPLAINT: , The patient does say, "I screwed up my whole life and wrecked my car." The patient claims he is med compliant, although his mother, and stepfather saying he is off his meds. He had a two-day stay at XYZ Hospital for medical clearance after his car accident, and no injuries were found other than a sore back, which was negative by x-ray and CT scan.,PRESENT ILLNESS: ,The patient is on a 72-your involuntary hold for danger to self and grave disability. He has a history of bipolar disorder with mania and depression with anxiety and panic attacks. Today, he went to involuntary court hearing and was released by the court. He is now being discharged from second floor ABCD Psychiatric Hospital.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:, Listed extensively in his admission note and will not be repeated.,MEDICAL HISTORY: , Includes migraine headaches and a history of concussion. He describes "allergy" to Haldol medication.,OUTPATIENT CARE: , The patient sees a private psychiatrist, Dr. X. Followup with Dr. X is arranged in four days' time and the patient is discharged with four days of medication. This information is known to Dr. X.,DISCHARGE MEDICATIONS:,The patient is discharged with:,1. Klonopin 1 mg t.i.d. p.r.n.,2. Extended-release lithium 450 mg b.i.d.,3. Depakote 1000 mg b.i.d.,4. Seroquel 1000 mg per day.,SOCIAL HISTORY: ,The patient lives with his girlfriend on an on-and-off basis and is unclear if they will be immediately moving back in together.,SUBSTANCE ABUSE: , The patient was actively tox screen positive for benzodiazepines, cocaine, and marijuana. The patient had an inpatient stay in 2008 at ABC Lodge for drug abuse treatment.,MENTAL STATUS EXAM:, Notable for lack of primary psychotic symptoms, some agitation, and psychomotor hyperactivity, uncooperative behavior regarding his need for ongoing acute psychiatric treatment and stabilization. There is an underlying hostile oppositional message in his communications.,FORMULATION: , The patient is a 21-year-old male with a history of bipolar disorder, anxiety, polysubstance abuse, and in addition ADHD. His recent behavior is may be at least in part associated with active polysubstance abuse and also appears to be a result of noncompliance with meds.,DIAGNOSES:,AXIS I:,1. Bipolar disorder.,2. Major depression with anxiety and panic attacks.,3. Polysubstance abuse, benzodiazepines, and others street meds.,4. ADHD.,AXIS II: , Deferred at present, but consider personality disorder traits.,AXIS III:, History of migraine headaches and past history of concussion.,AXIS IV: , Stressors are moderate.,AXIS V: , GAF is 40.,PLAN: , The patient is released from the hospital secondary to court evaluation, which did not extend his involuntary stay. He has an appointment in four days with his outpatient psychiatrist, Dr. X. He has four days' worth of medications and agrees to no self-harm or harm of others. Additionally, he agrees to let staff know or authorities know if he becomes acutely unsafe. His mother and stepfather have been informed of the patient's discharge and the followup plan.

identifying data patient yearold caucasian male attempted suicide trying jump moving car driven mother additionally totaled car earlier day occurrences occurred approximately hours arriving abcd hospital says panic attack leading car wreck denies behavior suicidal nature responding trying scare motherchief complaint patient say screwed whole life wrecked car patient claims med compliant although mother stepfather saying meds twoday stay xyz hospital medical clearance car accident injuries found sore back negative xray ct scanpresent illness patient involuntary hold danger self grave disability history bipolar disorder mania depression anxiety panic attacks today went involuntary court hearing released court discharged second floor abcd psychiatric hospitalpast psychiatric history listed extensively admission note repeatedmedical history includes migraine headaches history concussion describes allergy haldol medicationoutpatient care patient sees private psychiatrist dr x followup dr x arranged four days time patient discharged four days medication information known dr xdischarge medicationsthe patient discharged klonopin mg tid prn extendedrelease lithium mg bid depakote mg bid seroquel mg per daysocial history patient lives girlfriend onandoff basis unclear immediately moving back togethersubstance abuse patient actively tox screen positive benzodiazepines cocaine marijuana patient inpatient stay abc lodge drug abuse treatmentmental status exam notable lack primary psychotic symptoms agitation psychomotor hyperactivity uncooperative behavior regarding need ongoing acute psychiatric treatment stabilization underlying hostile oppositional message communicationsformulation patient yearold male history bipolar disorder anxiety polysubstance abuse addition adhd recent behavior may least part associated active polysubstance abuse also appears result noncompliance medsdiagnosesaxis bipolar disorder major depression anxiety panic attacks polysubstance abuse benzodiazepines others street meds adhdaxis ii deferred present consider personality disorder traitsaxis iii history migraine headaches past history concussionaxis iv stressors moderateaxis v gaf plan patient released hospital secondary court evaluation extend involuntary stay appointment four days outpatient psychiatrist dr x four days worth medications agrees selfharm harm others additionally agrees let staff know authorities know becomes acutely unsafe mother stepfather informed patients discharge followup plan

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA: , The patient is a 21-year-old Caucasian male, who attempted suicide by trying to jump from a moving car, which was being driven by his mother. Additionally, he totaled his own car earlier in the day, both of which occurrences occurred approximately 72 hours before arriving at ABCD Hospital. He says he had a "panic attack leading to the car wreck" and denies that any of his behavior was suicidal in nature responding, "I was just trying to scare my mother.",CHIEF COMPLAINT: , The patient does say, "I screwed up my whole life and wrecked my car." The patient claims he is med compliant, although his mother, and stepfather saying he is off his meds. He had a two-day stay at XYZ Hospital for medical clearance after his car accident, and no injuries were found other than a sore back, which was negative by x-ray and CT scan.,PRESENT ILLNESS: ,The patient is on a 72-your involuntary hold for danger to self and grave disability. He has a history of bipolar disorder with mania and depression with anxiety and panic attacks. Today, he went to involuntary court hearing and was released by the court. He is now being discharged from second floor ABCD Psychiatric Hospital.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:, Listed extensively in his admission note and will not be repeated.,MEDICAL HISTORY: , Includes migraine headaches and a history of concussion. He describes "allergy" to Haldol medication.,OUTPATIENT CARE: , The patient sees a private psychiatrist, Dr. X. Followup with Dr. X is arranged in four days' time and the patient is discharged with four days of medication. This information is known to Dr. X.,DISCHARGE MEDICATIONS:,The patient is discharged with:,1. Klonopin 1 mg t.i.d. p.r.n.,2. Extended-release lithium 450 mg b.i.d.,3. Depakote 1000 mg b.i.d.,4. Seroquel 1000 mg per day.,SOCIAL HISTORY: ,The patient lives with his girlfriend on an on-and-off basis and is unclear if they will be immediately moving back in together.,SUBSTANCE ABUSE: , The patient was actively tox screen positive for benzodiazepines, cocaine, and marijuana. The patient had an inpatient stay in 2008 at ABC Lodge for drug abuse treatment.,MENTAL STATUS EXAM:, Notable for lack of primary psychotic symptoms, some agitation, and psychomotor hyperactivity, uncooperative behavior regarding his need for ongoing acute psychiatric treatment and stabilization. There is an underlying hostile oppositional message in his communications.,FORMULATION: , The patient is a 21-year-old male with a history of bipolar disorder, anxiety, polysubstance abuse, and in addition ADHD. His recent behavior is may be at least in part associated with active polysubstance abuse and also appears to be a result of noncompliance with meds.,DIAGNOSES:,AXIS I:,1. Bipolar disorder.,2. Major depression with anxiety and panic attacks.,3. Polysubstance abuse, benzodiazepines, and others street meds.,4. ADHD.,AXIS II: , Deferred at present, but consider personality disorder traits.,AXIS III:, History of migraine headaches and past history of concussion.,AXIS IV: , Stressors are moderate.,AXIS V: , GAF is 40.,PLAN: , The patient is released from the hospital secondary to court evaluation, which did not extend his involuntary stay. He has an appointment in four days with his outpatient psychiatrist, Dr. X. He has four days' worth of medications and agrees to no self-harm or harm of others. Additionally, he agrees to let staff know or authorities know if he becomes acutely unsafe. His mother and stepfather have been informed of the patient's discharge and the followup plan. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

IDENTIFYING DATA: , The patient is a 30-year-old white male with a history of schizophrenia, chronic paranoid, was admitted for increasing mood lability, paranoia, and agitation.,CHIEF COMPLAINT: , "I am not sure." The patient has poor insight into hospitalization and need for treatment.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient has a history of schizophrenia and chronic paranoid, for which she has received treatment in Houston, Texas. According to mental health professionals, the patient had been noncompliant with medications for approximately two weeks. The patient had taken an airplane from Houston to Seattle, but became agitated, paranoid, expressing paranoid delusions that the stewardess and pilots were trying to reject him and was deplaned in Seattle. The patient was taken to the local shelter where he remained labile, breaking a window, and was taken to jail. The patient has now been discharged from jail but involuntarily detained for persistent paranoia and disorganization (no jail hold).,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , History of schizophrenia, chronic paranoid. The patient as noted has been treated in Houston but has not had recent treatment or medications.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: ,No acute medical problems noted.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: , None. The patient was most recently treated with Invega and Abilify according to his records.,FAMILY SOCIAL HISTORY: , The patient resides with his father in Houston. The patient has no known history of substances abuse. The patient as noted was in jail prior to admission after breaking a window at the local shelter but has no current jail hold.,FAMILY PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:, Need to increase database.,MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION:,Attitude: Calm and cooperative.,Appearance: Shows poor hygiene and grooming.,Psychomotor: Behavior is within normal limits without agitation or retardation. No EPS or TDS noted.,Affect: Is suspicious.,Mood: Anxious but cooperative.,Speech: Shows normal rate and rhythm.,Thoughts: Disorganized,Thought Content: Remarkable for paranoia "they want to hurt me.",Psychosis: The patient endorses paranoid delusions as above. The patient denies auditory hallucinations.,Suicidal/Homicidal Ideation: The patient denies on admission.,Cognitive Assessment: Grossly intact. The patient is alert and oriented x 3.,Judgment: Poor, shown by noncompliance with treatment.,Assets: Include stable physical status.,Limitations: Include recurrent psychosis.,FORMULATION: ,The patient with a history of schizophrenia was admitted for increasing mood lability and psychosis due to noncompliance with treatment.,INITIAL IMPRESSION:,AXIS I: Schizophrenia, chronic paranoid.,AXIS II: None.,AXIS III: None.,AXIS IV: Severe.,AXIS V: 10.,ESTIMATED LENGTH OF STAY: , 12 days.,PLAN: ,The patient will be restarted on Invega and Abilify for psychosis. The patient will also be continued on Cogentin for EPS. Increased database will be obtained.

identifying data patient yearold white male history schizophrenia chronic paranoid admitted increasing mood lability paranoia agitationchief complaint sure patient poor insight hospitalization need treatmenthistory present illness patient history schizophrenia chronic paranoid received treatment houston texas according mental health professionals patient noncompliant medications approximately two weeks patient taken airplane houston seattle became agitated paranoid expressing paranoid delusions stewardess pilots trying reject deplaned seattle patient taken local shelter remained labile breaking window taken jail patient discharged jail involuntarily detained persistent paranoia disorganization jail holdpast psychiatric history history schizophrenia chronic paranoid patient noted treated houston recent treatment medicationspast medical history acute medical problems notedcurrent medications none patient recently treated invega abilify according recordsfamily social history patient resides father houston patient known history substances abuse patient noted jail prior admission breaking window local shelter current jail holdfamily psychiatric history need increase databasemental status examinationattitude calm cooperativeappearance shows poor hygiene groomingpsychomotor behavior within normal limits without agitation retardation eps tds notedaffect suspiciousmood anxious cooperativespeech shows normal rate rhythmthoughts disorganizedthought content remarkable paranoia want hurt mepsychosis patient endorses paranoid delusions patient denies auditory hallucinationssuicidalhomicidal ideation patient denies admissioncognitive assessment grossly intact patient alert oriented x judgment poor shown noncompliance treatmentassets include stable physical statuslimitations include recurrent psychosisformulation patient history schizophrenia admitted increasing mood lability psychosis due noncompliance treatmentinitial impressionaxis schizophrenia chronic paranoidaxis ii noneaxis iii noneaxis iv severeaxis v estimated length stay daysplan patient restarted invega abilify psychosis patient also continued cogentin eps increased database obtained

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA: , The patient is a 30-year-old white male with a history of schizophrenia, chronic paranoid, was admitted for increasing mood lability, paranoia, and agitation.,CHIEF COMPLAINT: , "I am not sure." The patient has poor insight into hospitalization and need for treatment.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient has a history of schizophrenia and chronic paranoid, for which she has received treatment in Houston, Texas. According to mental health professionals, the patient had been noncompliant with medications for approximately two weeks. The patient had taken an airplane from Houston to Seattle, but became agitated, paranoid, expressing paranoid delusions that the stewardess and pilots were trying to reject him and was deplaned in Seattle. The patient was taken to the local shelter where he remained labile, breaking a window, and was taken to jail. The patient has now been discharged from jail but involuntarily detained for persistent paranoia and disorganization (no jail hold).,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , History of schizophrenia, chronic paranoid. The patient as noted has been treated in Houston but has not had recent treatment or medications.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: ,No acute medical problems noted.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: , None. The patient was most recently treated with Invega and Abilify according to his records.,FAMILY SOCIAL HISTORY: , The patient resides with his father in Houston. The patient has no known history of substances abuse. The patient as noted was in jail prior to admission after breaking a window at the local shelter but has no current jail hold.,FAMILY PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:, Need to increase database.,MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION:,Attitude: Calm and cooperative.,Appearance: Shows poor hygiene and grooming.,Psychomotor: Behavior is within normal limits without agitation or retardation. No EPS or TDS noted.,Affect: Is suspicious.,Mood: Anxious but cooperative.,Speech: Shows normal rate and rhythm.,Thoughts: Disorganized,Thought Content: Remarkable for paranoia "they want to hurt me.",Psychosis: The patient endorses paranoid delusions as above. The patient denies auditory hallucinations.,Suicidal/Homicidal Ideation: The patient denies on admission.,Cognitive Assessment: Grossly intact. The patient is alert and oriented x 3.,Judgment: Poor, shown by noncompliance with treatment.,Assets: Include stable physical status.,Limitations: Include recurrent psychosis.,FORMULATION: ,The patient with a history of schizophrenia was admitted for increasing mood lability and psychosis due to noncompliance with treatment.,INITIAL IMPRESSION:,AXIS I: Schizophrenia, chronic paranoid.,AXIS II: None.,AXIS III: None.,AXIS IV: Severe.,AXIS V: 10.,ESTIMATED LENGTH OF STAY: , 12 days.,PLAN: ,The patient will be restarted on Invega and Abilify for psychosis. The patient will also be continued on Cogentin for EPS. Increased database will be obtained. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

IDENTIFYING DATA: , The patient is a 41-year-old African-American male with a history of bipolar affective disorder, was admitted for noncompliance to the outpatient treatment and increased mood lability.,CHIEF COMPLIANT: , "I'm here because I'm different." The patient exhibits poor insight into illness and need for treatment.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient has a history of bipolar affective disorder and poor outpatient compliance. According to mental health professionals, he had not been compliant with medications or outpatient followup, and over the past several weeks, the patient had become increasingly labile. The patient had expressed grandiose delusions that he is Martin Luther King, and was found recently at a local church agitated throwing a pew and a lectern and required Tasering by police. On admission interview, the patient remains euphoric with poor insight.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , History of bipolar affective disorder. The patient has been treated with Depakote and Seroquel, but has had no recent treatment or followup. Dates of previous hospitalizations are not known.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: , None known.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: , None.,FAMILY SOCIAL HISTORY: , Unemployed. The patient resides independently. The patient denies recent substance abuse, although tox screen was positive for benzodiazepines.,LEGAL HISTORY: , Need to increase database.,FAMILY PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , Need to increase database.,MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION: ,Attitude: Suspicious, but cooperative.,Appearance: Shows appropriate hygiene and grooming.,Psychomotor Behavior: Within normal limits. No agitation or retardation. No EPS or TDS noted.,Affect: Labile.,Mood: Euphoric.,Speech: Pressured.,Thoughts: Disorganized.,Thought Content: Remarkable for grandiose delusions as noted. The patient denies auditory hallucinations.,Psychosis: Grandiose delusions as noted above.,Suicidal/Homicidal Ideation: The patient denies on admission.,Cognitive Assessment: Grossly intact. The patient is oriented x 3.,Judgment: Poor shown by noncompliance to the outpatient treatment.,Assets: Include stable physical status.,Limitations: Include recurrent psychosis.,FORMULATION: , The patient with a history of bipolar affective disorder, was admitted for increasing mood lability and noncompliance to the outpatient treatment.,INITIAL IMPRESSION:,AXIS I: BAD, manic with psychosis.,AXIS II: None.,AXIS III: None known.,AXIS IV: Severe.,AXIS V: 10.,ESTIMATED LENGTH OF STAY: , 12 days.,PLAN: , The patient will be restarted on Depakote for mood lability and Seroquel for psychosis and his response will be monitored closely. The patient will be evaluated for more structural outpatient followup following stabilization.

identifying data patient yearold africanamerican male history bipolar affective disorder admitted noncompliance outpatient treatment increased mood labilitychief compliant im im different patient exhibits poor insight illness need treatmenthistory present illness patient history bipolar affective disorder poor outpatient compliance according mental health professionals compliant medications outpatient followup past several weeks patient become increasingly labile patient expressed grandiose delusions martin luther king found recently local church agitated throwing pew lectern required tasering police admission interview patient remains euphoric poor insightpast psychiatric history history bipolar affective disorder patient treated depakote seroquel recent treatment followup dates previous hospitalizations knownpast medical history none knowncurrent medications nonefamily social history unemployed patient resides independently patient denies recent substance abuse although tox screen positive benzodiazepineslegal history need increase databasefamily psychiatric history need increase databasemental status examination attitude suspicious cooperativeappearance shows appropriate hygiene groomingpsychomotor behavior within normal limits agitation retardation eps tds notedaffect labilemood euphoricspeech pressuredthoughts disorganizedthought content remarkable grandiose delusions noted patient denies auditory hallucinationspsychosis grandiose delusions noted abovesuicidalhomicidal ideation patient denies admissioncognitive assessment grossly intact patient oriented x judgment poor shown noncompliance outpatient treatmentassets include stable physical statuslimitations include recurrent psychosisformulation patient history bipolar affective disorder admitted increasing mood lability noncompliance outpatient treatmentinitial impressionaxis bad manic psychosisaxis ii noneaxis iii none knownaxis iv severeaxis v estimated length stay daysplan patient restarted depakote mood lability seroquel psychosis response monitored closely patient evaluated structural outpatient followup following stabilization

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA: , The patient is a 41-year-old African-American male with a history of bipolar affective disorder, was admitted for noncompliance to the outpatient treatment and increased mood lability.,CHIEF COMPLIANT: , "I'm here because I'm different." The patient exhibits poor insight into illness and need for treatment.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient has a history of bipolar affective disorder and poor outpatient compliance. According to mental health professionals, he had not been compliant with medications or outpatient followup, and over the past several weeks, the patient had become increasingly labile. The patient had expressed grandiose delusions that he is Martin Luther King, and was found recently at a local church agitated throwing a pew and a lectern and required Tasering by police. On admission interview, the patient remains euphoric with poor insight.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , History of bipolar affective disorder. The patient has been treated with Depakote and Seroquel, but has had no recent treatment or followup. Dates of previous hospitalizations are not known.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: , None known.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: , None.,FAMILY SOCIAL HISTORY: , Unemployed. The patient resides independently. The patient denies recent substance abuse, although tox screen was positive for benzodiazepines.,LEGAL HISTORY: , Need to increase database.,FAMILY PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , Need to increase database.,MENTAL STATUS EXAMINATION: ,Attitude: Suspicious, but cooperative.,Appearance: Shows appropriate hygiene and grooming.,Psychomotor Behavior: Within normal limits. No agitation or retardation. No EPS or TDS noted.,Affect: Labile.,Mood: Euphoric.,Speech: Pressured.,Thoughts: Disorganized.,Thought Content: Remarkable for grandiose delusions as noted. The patient denies auditory hallucinations.,Psychosis: Grandiose delusions as noted above.,Suicidal/Homicidal Ideation: The patient denies on admission.,Cognitive Assessment: Grossly intact. The patient is oriented x 3.,Judgment: Poor shown by noncompliance to the outpatient treatment.,Assets: Include stable physical status.,Limitations: Include recurrent psychosis.,FORMULATION: , The patient with a history of bipolar affective disorder, was admitted for increasing mood lability and noncompliance to the outpatient treatment.,INITIAL IMPRESSION:,AXIS I: BAD, manic with psychosis.,AXIS II: None.,AXIS III: None known.,AXIS IV: Severe.,AXIS V: 10.,ESTIMATED LENGTH OF STAY: , 12 days.,PLAN: , The patient will be restarted on Depakote for mood lability and Seroquel for psychosis and his response will be monitored closely. The patient will be evaluated for more structural outpatient followup following stabilization. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

IDENTIFYING DATA: , This is a 26-year-old Caucasian male of unknown employment, who has been living with his father.,CHIEF COMPLAINT AND/OR REACTION TO HOSPITALIZATION: , The patient is unresponsive.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient was found by outpatient case manager to be unresponsive and incontinent of urine and feces at his father's home. It is unknown how long the patient has been decompensated after a stay at Hospital.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , Inpatient ITA stay at Hospital one year ago, outpatient at Valley Cities, but currently not engaged in treatment.,MEDICAL HISTORY: , Due to the patient being unresponsive and very little information available in the chart, the only medical history that we can identify is to observe that the patient is quite thin for height. He is likely dehydrated, as it appears that he has not had food or fluids for quite some time.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS:, Prior to admission, we do not have that information. He has been started on Ativan 2 mg p.o. or IM if he refuses the p.o. and this would be t.i.d. to treat the catatonia.,SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: ,The patient has been living in his father's home and this is all the information that we have available from the chart.,SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL HISTORY: ,It is unknown with the exception of nicotine use.,LEGAL HISTORY: , Unknown.,GENETIC PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , Unknown.,MENTAL STATUS EXAM:,Attitude: The patient is unresponsive.,Appearance: He is lying in bed in the fetal position with a blanket over his head.,Psychomotor: Catatonic.,EPS/TD: Unable to assess though his limbs are quite contracted.,Affect: Unresponsive.,Mood: Unresponsive.,Speech: Unresponsive.,Thought Process And Thought Content: Unresponsive.,Psychosis: Unable to elicit information to make this assessment.,Suicidal/Homicidal: Also unable to elicit this information.,Cognitive Assessment: Unable to elicit.,Judgment And Insight: Unable to elicit.,Assets: The patient is young.,Limitations: Severe decompensation.,FORMULATION: ,This is a 26-year-old Caucasian male with a diagnosis of psychosis, NOS, admitted with catatonia.,DIAGNOSES:,AXIS I: Psychosis, NOS.,AXIS II: Deferred.,AXIS III: Dehydration.,AXIS IV: Severe.,AXIS V: 10.,ESTIMATED LENGTH OF STAY: , 10 to 14 days.,RECOMMENDATIONS AND PLAN:,1. Stabilize medically from the dehydration per internal medicine.,2. Medications, milieu therapy to assist with re-compensation.

identifying data yearold caucasian male unknown employment living fatherchief complaint andor reaction hospitalization patient unresponsivehistory present illness patient found outpatient case manager unresponsive incontinent urine feces fathers home unknown long patient decompensated stay hospitalpast psychiatric history inpatient ita stay hospital one year ago outpatient valley cities currently engaged treatmentmedical history due patient unresponsive little information available chart medical history identify observe patient quite thin height likely dehydrated appears food fluids quite timecurrent medications prior admission information started ativan mg po im refuses po would tid treat catatoniasocial developmental history patient living fathers home information available chartsubstance alcohol history unknown exception nicotine uselegal history unknowngenetic psychiatric history unknownmental status examattitude patient unresponsiveappearance lying bed fetal position blanket headpsychomotor catatonicepstd unable assess though limbs quite contractedaffect unresponsivemood unresponsivespeech unresponsivethought process thought content unresponsivepsychosis unable elicit information make assessmentsuicidalhomicidal also unable elicit informationcognitive assessment unable elicitjudgment insight unable elicitassets patient younglimitations severe decompensationformulation yearold caucasian male diagnosis psychosis nos admitted catatoniadiagnosesaxis psychosis nosaxis ii deferredaxis iii dehydrationaxis iv severeaxis v estimated length stay daysrecommendations plan stabilize medically dehydration per internal medicine medications milieu therapy assist recompensation

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA: , This is a 26-year-old Caucasian male of unknown employment, who has been living with his father.,CHIEF COMPLAINT AND/OR REACTION TO HOSPITALIZATION: , The patient is unresponsive.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient was found by outpatient case manager to be unresponsive and incontinent of urine and feces at his father's home. It is unknown how long the patient has been decompensated after a stay at Hospital.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , Inpatient ITA stay at Hospital one year ago, outpatient at Valley Cities, but currently not engaged in treatment.,MEDICAL HISTORY: , Due to the patient being unresponsive and very little information available in the chart, the only medical history that we can identify is to observe that the patient is quite thin for height. He is likely dehydrated, as it appears that he has not had food or fluids for quite some time.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS:, Prior to admission, we do not have that information. He has been started on Ativan 2 mg p.o. or IM if he refuses the p.o. and this would be t.i.d. to treat the catatonia.,SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: ,The patient has been living in his father's home and this is all the information that we have available from the chart.,SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL HISTORY: ,It is unknown with the exception of nicotine use.,LEGAL HISTORY: , Unknown.,GENETIC PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , Unknown.,MENTAL STATUS EXAM:,Attitude: The patient is unresponsive.,Appearance: He is lying in bed in the fetal position with a blanket over his head.,Psychomotor: Catatonic.,EPS/TD: Unable to assess though his limbs are quite contracted.,Affect: Unresponsive.,Mood: Unresponsive.,Speech: Unresponsive.,Thought Process And Thought Content: Unresponsive.,Psychosis: Unable to elicit information to make this assessment.,Suicidal/Homicidal: Also unable to elicit this information.,Cognitive Assessment: Unable to elicit.,Judgment And Insight: Unable to elicit.,Assets: The patient is young.,Limitations: Severe decompensation.,FORMULATION: ,This is a 26-year-old Caucasian male with a diagnosis of psychosis, NOS, admitted with catatonia.,DIAGNOSES:,AXIS I: Psychosis, NOS.,AXIS II: Deferred.,AXIS III: Dehydration.,AXIS IV: Severe.,AXIS V: 10.,ESTIMATED LENGTH OF STAY: , 10 to 14 days.,RECOMMENDATIONS AND PLAN:,1. Stabilize medically from the dehydration per internal medicine.,2. Medications, milieu therapy to assist with re-compensation. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

IDENTIFYING DATA:, Psychosis.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient is a 28-year-old Samoan female who was her grandmother's caretaker. Her grandmother unfortunately had passed away recently and then the patient had developed erratic behavior. She had lived with her parents and son, but parents removed son from the home, secondary to the patient's erratic behavior. Recently, she was picked up by Kent Police Department "leaping on Highway 99.",PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: , PTSD, depression, and substance abuse.,PAST SURGICAL HISTORY: ,Unknown.,ALLERGIES:, Unknown.,MEDICATIONS: , Unknown.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: , Unable to obtain secondary to the patient being in seclusion.,OBJECTIVE:, Vital signs that were previously taken revealed a blood pressure of 152/86, pulse of 106, respirations of 18, and temperature is 97.6 degrees Fahrenheit. General appearance, HEENT, and history and physical examination was unable to be obtained today, as patient was put into seclusion.,LABORATORY DATA: , Laboratory reviewed reveals a BMP, slightly elevated glucose at 100.2. Previous urine tox was positive for THC. Urinalysis was negative, but did note positive UA wbc's. CBC, slightly elevated leukocytosis at 12.0, normal range is 4 to 11.,ASSESSMENT AND PLAN:,AXIS I: Psychosis. Inpatient Psychiatric Team to follow.,AXIS II: Deferred.,AXIS III: We were unable to perform physical examination on the patient today secondary to her being in seclusion. Laboratory was reviewed revealing leukocytosis, possibly secondary to a UTI. We will wait until the patient is out of seclusion to perform examination. Should she have some complaints of dysuria or any suprapubic pain, then we will begin on appropriate antimicrobial therapy. We will followup with the patient should any new medical issues arise.

identifying data psychosishistory present illness patient yearold samoan female grandmothers caretaker grandmother unfortunately passed away recently patient developed erratic behavior lived parents son parents removed son home secondary patients erratic behavior recently picked kent police department leaping highway past medical history ptsd depression substance abusepast surgical history unknownallergies unknownmedications unknownreview systems unable obtain secondary patient seclusionobjective vital signs previously taken revealed blood pressure pulse respirations temperature degrees fahrenheit general appearance heent history physical examination unable obtained today patient put seclusionlaboratory data laboratory reviewed reveals bmp slightly elevated glucose previous urine tox positive thc urinalysis negative note positive ua wbcs cbc slightly elevated leukocytosis normal range assessment planaxis psychosis inpatient psychiatric team followaxis ii deferredaxis iii unable perform physical examination patient today secondary seclusion laboratory reviewed revealing leukocytosis possibly secondary uti wait patient seclusion perform examination complaints dysuria suprapubic pain begin appropriate antimicrobial therapy followup patient new medical issues arise

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA:, Psychosis.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient is a 28-year-old Samoan female who was her grandmother's caretaker. Her grandmother unfortunately had passed away recently and then the patient had developed erratic behavior. She had lived with her parents and son, but parents removed son from the home, secondary to the patient's erratic behavior. Recently, she was picked up by Kent Police Department "leaping on Highway 99.",PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: , PTSD, depression, and substance abuse.,PAST SURGICAL HISTORY: ,Unknown.,ALLERGIES:, Unknown.,MEDICATIONS: , Unknown.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: , Unable to obtain secondary to the patient being in seclusion.,OBJECTIVE:, Vital signs that were previously taken revealed a blood pressure of 152/86, pulse of 106, respirations of 18, and temperature is 97.6 degrees Fahrenheit. General appearance, HEENT, and history and physical examination was unable to be obtained today, as patient was put into seclusion.,LABORATORY DATA: , Laboratory reviewed reveals a BMP, slightly elevated glucose at 100.2. Previous urine tox was positive for THC. Urinalysis was negative, but did note positive UA wbc's. CBC, slightly elevated leukocytosis at 12.0, normal range is 4 to 11.,ASSESSMENT AND PLAN:,AXIS I: Psychosis. Inpatient Psychiatric Team to follow.,AXIS II: Deferred.,AXIS III: We were unable to perform physical examination on the patient today secondary to her being in seclusion. Laboratory was reviewed revealing leukocytosis, possibly secondary to a UTI. We will wait until the patient is out of seclusion to perform examination. Should she have some complaints of dysuria or any suprapubic pain, then we will begin on appropriate antimicrobial therapy. We will followup with the patient should any new medical issues arise. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

IDENTIFYING DATA:, The patient is a 45-year-old white male. He is unemployed, presumably on disability and lives with his partner.,CHIEF COMPLAINT: , "I'm in jail because I was wrongly arrested." The patient is admitted on a 72-hour Involuntary Treatment Act for grave disability.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient has minimal insight into the circumstances that resulted in this admission. He reports being diagnosed with AIDS and schizophrenia for some time, but states he believes that he has maintained his stable baseline for many months of treatment for either condition. Prior to admission, the patient was brought to Emergency Room after he attempted to shoplift from a local department store, during which he apparently slapped his partner. The patient was disorganized with police and emergency room staff, and he was ultimately detained on a 72-hour Involuntary Treatment Act for grave disability.,On the interview, the patient is still disorganized and confused. He believes that he has been arrested and is in jail. Reports a history of mental health treatment, but denies benefiting from this in the past and does not think that it is currently necessary.,I was able to contact his partner by telephone. His partner reports the patient is paranoid and has bizarre behavior at baseline over the time that he has known him for the last 16 years, with occasional episodes of symptomatic worsening, from which he spontaneously recovers. His partner estimates the patient spends about 20% of the year in episodes of worse symptoms. His partner states that in the last one to two months, the patient has become worse than he has ever seen him with increased paranoia above the baseline and he states the patient has been barricading himself in his house and unplugging all electrical appliances for unclear reasons. He also reports the patient has been sleeping less and estimates his average duration to be three to four hours a night. He also reports the patient has been spending money impulsively in the last month and has actually incurred overdraft charges on his checking account on three different occasions recently. He also reports that the patient has been making threats of harm to him and that His partner no longer feels that he is safe having him at home. He reports that the patient has been eating regularly with no recent weight loss. He states that the patient is observed responding to internal stimuli, occasionally at baseline, but this has gotten worse in the last few months. His partner was unaware of any obvious medical changes in the last one to two months coinciding with onset of recent symptomatic worsening. He reports of the patient's longstanding poor compliance with treatment of his mental health or age-related conditions and attributes this to the patient's dislike of taking medicine. He also reports that the patient has expressed the belief in the past that he does not suffer from either condition.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , The patient's partner reports that the patient was diagnosed with schizophrenia in his 20s and he has been hospitalized on two occasions in the 1980s and that there was a third admission to a psychiatric facility, but the date of this admission is currently unknown. The patient was last enrolled in an outpatient mental health treatment in mid 2009. He dropped out of care about six months ago when he moved with his partner. His partner reports the patient was most recently prescribed Seroquel, which, though the patient denied benefiting from, his partner felt was "useful, but not dosed high enough." Past medication trials that the patient reports include Haldol and lithium, neither of which he found to be particularly helpful.,MEDICAL HISTORY: , The patient reports being diagnosed with HIV and AIDS in 1994 and believes this was secondary to unprotected sexual contact in the years prior to his diagnosis. He is currently followed at Clinic, where he has both an assigned physician and a case manager, but treatment compliance has been poor with no use of antiretroviral meds in the last year. The patient is fairly vague on his history of AIDS related conditions, but does identify the following: Thrush, skin lesions, and lung infections; additional details of these problems are not currently known.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: , None.,ALLERGIES:, No known drug allergies.,SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: , The patient lives with his partner. He is unemployed. Details of his educational and occupational history are not currently known. His source of finances is also unknown, though social security disability is presumed.,SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL HISTORY: , The patient smoked one to two packs per day for most of the last year, but has increased this to two to three packs per day in the last month. His partner reports that the patient consumed alcohol occasionally, but denies any excessive or binge use recently. The patient reports smoking marijuana a few times in his life, but not recently. Denies other illicit substance use.,LEGAL HISTORY: ,Unknown.,GENETIC PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:, Also unknown.,MENTAL STATUS EXAM:,Attitude: The patient demonstrates only variable cooperation with interview, requires frequent redirection to respond to questions. His appearance is cachectic. The patient is poorly groomed.,Psychomotor: There is no psychomotor agitation or retardation. No other observed extrapyramidal symptoms or tardive dyskinesia.,Affect: His affect is fairly detached.,Mood: Describes his mood is "okay.",Speech: His speech is normal rate and volume. Tone, his volume was decreased initially, but this improved during the course of the interview.,Thought Process: His thought processes are markedly tangential.,Thought content: The patient is fairly scattered. He will provide history with frequent redirection, but he does not appear to stay on one topic for any length of time. He denies currently auditory or visual hallucinations, though his partner says that this is a feature present at baseline. Paranoid delusions are elicited.,Homicidal/Suicidal Ideation: He denies suicidal or homicidal ideation. Denies previous suicide attempts.,Cognitive Assessment: Cognitively, he is alert and oriented to person and year only. His memory is intact to names of his Madison Clinic providers.,Insight/Judgment: His insight is absent as evidenced by his repeated questioning of the validity of his AIDS and mental health diagnoses. His judgment is poor as evidenced by his longstanding pattern of minimal engagement in treatment of his mental health and physical health conditions.,Assets: His assets include his housing and his history of supportive relationship with his partner over many years.,Limitations: His limitations include his AIDS and his history of poor compliance with treatment.,FORMULATION: ,The patient is a 45-year-old white male with a history of schizophrenia and AIDS. He was admitted for disorganized and assaultive behaviors while off all medications for the last six months. It is unclear to me how much his presentation is a direct expression of an AIDS-related condition, though I suspect the impact of his HIV status is likely to be substantial.,DIAGNOSES:,AXIS I: Schizophrenia by history. Rule out AIDS-induced psychosis. Rule out AIDS-related cognitive disorder.,AXIS II: Deferred.,AXIS III: AIDS (stable by his report). Anemia.,AXIS IV: Relationship strain and the possibility that he may be unable to return to his home upon discharge; minimal engagement in mental health and HIV-related providers.,AXIS V: Global Assessment Functioning is currently 15.,PLAN: , I will attempt to increase the database, will specifically request records from the last mental health providers. The Internal Medicine Service will evaluate and treat any acute medical issues that could be helpful to collaborate with his providers at Clinic regarding issues related to his AIDS diagnosis. With the patient's permission, I will start quetiapine at a dose of 100 mg at bedtime, given the patient's partner report of partial, but response to this agent in the past. I anticipate titrating further for effect during the course of his admission.

identifying data patient yearold white male unemployed presumably disability lives partnerchief complaint im jail wrongly arrested patient admitted hour involuntary treatment act grave disabilityhistory present illness patient minimal insight circumstances resulted admission reports diagnosed aids schizophrenia time states believes maintained stable baseline many months treatment either condition prior admission patient brought emergency room attempted shoplift local department store apparently slapped partner patient disorganized police emergency room staff ultimately detained hour involuntary treatment act grave disabilityon interview patient still disorganized confused believes arrested jail reports history mental health treatment denies benefiting past think currently necessaryi able contact partner telephone partner reports patient paranoid bizarre behavior baseline time known last years occasional episodes symptomatic worsening spontaneously recovers partner estimates patient spends year episodes worse symptoms partner states last one two months patient become worse ever seen increased paranoia baseline states patient barricading house unplugging electrical appliances unclear reasons also reports patient sleeping less estimates average duration three four hours night also reports patient spending money impulsively last month actually incurred overdraft charges checking account three different occasions recently also reports patient making threats harm partner longer feels safe home reports patient eating regularly recent weight loss states patient observed responding internal stimuli occasionally baseline gotten worse last months partner unaware obvious medical changes last one two months coinciding onset recent symptomatic worsening reports patients longstanding poor compliance treatment mental health agerelated conditions attributes patients dislike taking medicine also reports patient expressed belief past suffer either conditionpast psychiatric history patients partner reports patient diagnosed schizophrenia hospitalized two occasions third admission psychiatric facility date admission currently unknown patient last enrolled outpatient mental health treatment mid dropped care six months ago moved partner partner reports patient recently prescribed seroquel though patient denied benefiting partner felt useful dosed high enough past medication trials patient reports include haldol lithium neither found particularly helpfulmedical history patient reports diagnosed hiv aids believes secondary unprotected sexual contact years prior diagnosis currently followed clinic assigned physician case manager treatment compliance poor use antiretroviral meds last year patient fairly vague history aids related conditions identify following thrush skin lesions lung infections additional details problems currently knowncurrent medications noneallergies known drug allergiessocial developmental history patient lives partner unemployed details educational occupational history currently known source finances also unknown though social security disability presumedsubstance alcohol history patient smoked one two packs per day last year increased two three packs per day last month partner reports patient consumed alcohol occasionally denies excessive binge use recently patient reports smoking marijuana times life recently denies illicit substance uselegal history unknowngenetic psychiatric history also unknownmental status examattitude patient demonstrates variable cooperation interview requires frequent redirection respond questions appearance cachectic patient poorly groomedpsychomotor psychomotor agitation retardation observed extrapyramidal symptoms tardive dyskinesiaaffect affect fairly detachedmood describes mood okayspeech speech normal rate volume tone volume decreased initially improved course interviewthought process thought processes markedly tangentialthought content patient fairly scattered provide history frequent redirection appear stay one topic length time denies currently auditory visual hallucinations though partner says feature present baseline paranoid delusions elicitedhomicidalsuicidal ideation denies suicidal homicidal ideation denies previous suicide attemptscognitive assessment cognitively alert oriented person year memory intact names madison clinic providersinsightjudgment insight absent evidenced repeated questioning validity aids mental health diagnoses judgment poor evidenced longstanding pattern minimal engagement treatment mental health physical health conditionsassets assets include housing history supportive relationship partner many yearslimitations limitations include aids history poor compliance treatmentformulation patient yearold white male history schizophrenia aids admitted disorganized assaultive behaviors medications last six months unclear much presentation direct expression aidsrelated condition though suspect impact hiv status likely substantialdiagnosesaxis schizophrenia history rule aidsinduced psychosis rule aidsrelated cognitive disorderaxis ii deferredaxis iii aids stable report anemiaaxis iv relationship strain possibility may unable return home upon discharge minimal engagement mental health hivrelated providersaxis v global assessment functioning currently plan attempt increase database specifically request records last mental health providers internal medicine service evaluate treat acute medical issues could helpful collaborate providers clinic regarding issues related aids diagnosis patients permission start quetiapine dose mg bedtime given patients partner report partial response agent past anticipate titrating effect course admission

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA:, The patient is a 45-year-old white male. He is unemployed, presumably on disability and lives with his partner.,CHIEF COMPLAINT: , "I'm in jail because I was wrongly arrested." The patient is admitted on a 72-hour Involuntary Treatment Act for grave disability.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: , The patient has minimal insight into the circumstances that resulted in this admission. He reports being diagnosed with AIDS and schizophrenia for some time, but states he believes that he has maintained his stable baseline for many months of treatment for either condition. Prior to admission, the patient was brought to Emergency Room after he attempted to shoplift from a local department store, during which he apparently slapped his partner. The patient was disorganized with police and emergency room staff, and he was ultimately detained on a 72-hour Involuntary Treatment Act for grave disability.,On the interview, the patient is still disorganized and confused. He believes that he has been arrested and is in jail. Reports a history of mental health treatment, but denies benefiting from this in the past and does not think that it is currently necessary.,I was able to contact his partner by telephone. His partner reports the patient is paranoid and has bizarre behavior at baseline over the time that he has known him for the last 16 years, with occasional episodes of symptomatic worsening, from which he spontaneously recovers. His partner estimates the patient spends about 20% of the year in episodes of worse symptoms. His partner states that in the last one to two months, the patient has become worse than he has ever seen him with increased paranoia above the baseline and he states the patient has been barricading himself in his house and unplugging all electrical appliances for unclear reasons. He also reports the patient has been sleeping less and estimates his average duration to be three to four hours a night. He also reports the patient has been spending money impulsively in the last month and has actually incurred overdraft charges on his checking account on three different occasions recently. He also reports that the patient has been making threats of harm to him and that His partner no longer feels that he is safe having him at home. He reports that the patient has been eating regularly with no recent weight loss. He states that the patient is observed responding to internal stimuli, occasionally at baseline, but this has gotten worse in the last few months. His partner was unaware of any obvious medical changes in the last one to two months coinciding with onset of recent symptomatic worsening. He reports of the patient's longstanding poor compliance with treatment of his mental health or age-related conditions and attributes this to the patient's dislike of taking medicine. He also reports that the patient has expressed the belief in the past that he does not suffer from either condition.,PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: , The patient's partner reports that the patient was diagnosed with schizophrenia in his 20s and he has been hospitalized on two occasions in the 1980s and that there was a third admission to a psychiatric facility, but the date of this admission is currently unknown. The patient was last enrolled in an outpatient mental health treatment in mid 2009. He dropped out of care about six months ago when he moved with his partner. His partner reports the patient was most recently prescribed Seroquel, which, though the patient denied benefiting from, his partner felt was "useful, but not dosed high enough." Past medication trials that the patient reports include Haldol and lithium, neither of which he found to be particularly helpful.,MEDICAL HISTORY: , The patient reports being diagnosed with HIV and AIDS in 1994 and believes this was secondary to unprotected sexual contact in the years prior to his diagnosis. He is currently followed at Clinic, where he has both an assigned physician and a case manager, but treatment compliance has been poor with no use of antiretroviral meds in the last year. The patient is fairly vague on his history of AIDS related conditions, but does identify the following: Thrush, skin lesions, and lung infections; additional details of these problems are not currently known.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: , None.,ALLERGIES:, No known drug allergies.,SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY: , The patient lives with his partner. He is unemployed. Details of his educational and occupational history are not currently known. His source of finances is also unknown, though social security disability is presumed.,SUBSTANCE AND ALCOHOL HISTORY: , The patient smoked one to two packs per day for most of the last year, but has increased this to two to three packs per day in the last month. His partner reports that the patient consumed alcohol occasionally, but denies any excessive or binge use recently. The patient reports smoking marijuana a few times in his life, but not recently. Denies other illicit substance use.,LEGAL HISTORY: ,Unknown.,GENETIC PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY:, Also unknown.,MENTAL STATUS EXAM:,Attitude: The patient demonstrates only variable cooperation with interview, requires frequent redirection to respond to questions. His appearance is cachectic. The patient is poorly groomed.,Psychomotor: There is no psychomotor agitation or retardation. No other observed extrapyramidal symptoms or tardive dyskinesia.,Affect: His affect is fairly detached.,Mood: Describes his mood is "okay.",Speech: His speech is normal rate and volume. Tone, his volume was decreased initially, but this improved during the course of the interview.,Thought Process: His thought processes are markedly tangential.,Thought content: The patient is fairly scattered. He will provide history with frequent redirection, but he does not appear to stay on one topic for any length of time. He denies currently auditory or visual hallucinations, though his partner says that this is a feature present at baseline. Paranoid delusions are elicited.,Homicidal/Suicidal Ideation: He denies suicidal or homicidal ideation. Denies previous suicide attempts.,Cognitive Assessment: Cognitively, he is alert and oriented to person and year only. His memory is intact to names of his Madison Clinic providers.,Insight/Judgment: His insight is absent as evidenced by his repeated questioning of the validity of his AIDS and mental health diagnoses. His judgment is poor as evidenced by his longstanding pattern of minimal engagement in treatment of his mental health and physical health conditions.,Assets: His assets include his housing and his history of supportive relationship with his partner over many years.,Limitations: His limitations include his AIDS and his history of poor compliance with treatment.,FORMULATION: ,The patient is a 45-year-old white male with a history of schizophrenia and AIDS. He was admitted for disorganized and assaultive behaviors while off all medications for the last six months. It is unclear to me how much his presentation is a direct expression of an AIDS-related condition, though I suspect the impact of his HIV status is likely to be substantial.,DIAGNOSES:,AXIS I: Schizophrenia by history. Rule out AIDS-induced psychosis. Rule out AIDS-related cognitive disorder.,AXIS II: Deferred.,AXIS III: AIDS (stable by his report). Anemia.,AXIS IV: Relationship strain and the possibility that he may be unable to return to his home upon discharge; minimal engagement in mental health and HIV-related providers.,AXIS V: Global Assessment Functioning is currently 15.,PLAN: , I will attempt to increase the database, will specifically request records from the last mental health providers. The Internal Medicine Service will evaluate and treat any acute medical issues that could be helpful to collaborate with his providers at Clinic regarding issues related to his AIDS diagnosis. With the patient's permission, I will start quetiapine at a dose of 100 mg at bedtime, given the patient's partner report of partial, but response to this agent in the past. I anticipate titrating further for effect during the course of his admission. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

IDENTIFYING DATA:, This is a 40-year-old male seen today for a 90-day revocation admission. He had been reported by his case manager as being noncompliant with medications, refusing oral or IM medications, became agitated, had to be taken to ABCD for evaluation, admitted at that time to auditory hallucinations and confusion and was committed for admission at this time. He has a psychiatric history of schizophrenia, was previously admitted here at XYZ on 12/19/2009, had another voluntary admission in ABCD in 1998.,MEDICATIONS: , Listed as Invega and Risperdal.,ALLERGIES: , None known to medications.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: ,The only identified problem in his chart is that he is being treated for hyperlipidemia with gemfibrozil. The patient is unaware and cannot remember what medications he had been taking or whether he had been taking them at all as an outpatient.,FAMILY HISTORY: , Listed as unknown in the chart as far as other psychiatric illnesses. The patient himself states that his parents are deceased and that he raised himself in the Philippines.,SOCIAL HISTORY:, He immigrated to this country in 1984, although he lists himself as having a green card still at this time. He states he lives on his own. He is a single male with no history of marriage or children and that he had high school education. His recreational drug use in the chart indicates that he has had a history of methamphetamines. The patient denies this at this time. He also denies current alcohol use. He does smoke. He is unable to tell me of any PCP. He is in counseling service with his case manager being XYZ.,LEGAL HISTORY: , He had an assault in December 2009, which led to his previous detention. It is unknown whether he is under legal constraints at this time.,OBJECTIVE FINDINGS: ,VITAL SIGNS: , Blood pressure is 125/75. His weight is 197 with height 5 feet 4 inches.,GENERAL:, He is cooperative, although disorganized and focusing entirely and telling me that he is here because there was some confusion in how he took his medications. He does not endorse any voices at this time.,HEENT: , His head exam is normal with normal scalp. HEENT is unremarkable. Pupils equal and reactive to light and accommodation. TMs are normal.,NECK:, Unremarkable with no masses or tenderness.,CARDIOVASCULAR:, Normal S1 and S2. No murmurs.,LUNGS:, Clear.,ABDOMEN: ,Negative with no scars.,GU: ,Not done.,RECTAL:, Not done.,DERM:, He does have a scarring of acne lesions, both face and back.,EXTREMITIES:, Otherwise negative.,NEUROLOGIC: , Cranial nerves II through X normal. Reflexes are normal and gait is unremarkable.,LABORATORY DATA: , His labs done at ABCD showed his CMP to be normal with an elevated white count of 17.2. Chest x-ray was indicated as being done and normal as was a UA and he did apparently receive hydration in the hospital with IV fluids.,ASSESSMENT: , History of hyperlipidemia with elevated triglycerides. We will maintain his gemfibrozil 600 b.i.d. and for health maintenance issues, we will also maintain just a vitamin daily and we will obtain recheck on his labs and lipid levels in one week after treatment is initiated.

identifying data yearold male seen today day revocation admission reported case manager noncompliant medications refusing oral im medications became agitated taken abcd evaluation admitted time auditory hallucinations confusion committed admission time psychiatric history schizophrenia previously admitted xyz another voluntary admission abcd medications listed invega risperdalallergies none known medicationspast medical history identified problem chart treated hyperlipidemia gemfibrozil patient unaware cannot remember medications taking whether taking outpatientfamily history listed unknown chart far psychiatric illnesses patient states parents deceased raised philippinessocial history immigrated country although lists green card still time states lives single male history marriage children high school education recreational drug use chart indicates history methamphetamines patient denies time also denies current alcohol use smoke unable tell pcp counseling service case manager xyzlegal history assault december led previous detention unknown whether legal constraints timeobjective findings vital signs blood pressure weight height feet inchesgeneral cooperative although disorganized focusing entirely telling confusion took medications endorse voices timeheent head exam normal normal scalp heent unremarkable pupils equal reactive light accommodation tms normalneck unremarkable masses tendernesscardiovascular normal murmurslungs clearabdomen negative scarsgu donerectal donederm scarring acne lesions face backextremities otherwise negativeneurologic cranial nerves ii x normal reflexes normal gait unremarkablelaboratory data labs done abcd showed cmp normal elevated white count chest xray indicated done normal ua apparently receive hydration hospital iv fluidsassessment history hyperlipidemia elevated triglycerides maintain gemfibrozil bid health maintenance issues also maintain vitamin daily obtain recheck labs lipid levels one week treatment initiated

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IDENTIFYING DATA:, This is a 40-year-old male seen today for a 90-day revocation admission. He had been reported by his case manager as being noncompliant with medications, refusing oral or IM medications, became agitated, had to be taken to ABCD for evaluation, admitted at that time to auditory hallucinations and confusion and was committed for admission at this time. He has a psychiatric history of schizophrenia, was previously admitted here at XYZ on 12/19/2009, had another voluntary admission in ABCD in 1998.,MEDICATIONS: , Listed as Invega and Risperdal.,ALLERGIES: , None known to medications.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: ,The only identified problem in his chart is that he is being treated for hyperlipidemia with gemfibrozil. The patient is unaware and cannot remember what medications he had been taking or whether he had been taking them at all as an outpatient.,FAMILY HISTORY: , Listed as unknown in the chart as far as other psychiatric illnesses. The patient himself states that his parents are deceased and that he raised himself in the Philippines.,SOCIAL HISTORY:, He immigrated to this country in 1984, although he lists himself as having a green card still at this time. He states he lives on his own. He is a single male with no history of marriage or children and that he had high school education. His recreational drug use in the chart indicates that he has had a history of methamphetamines. The patient denies this at this time. He also denies current alcohol use. He does smoke. He is unable to tell me of any PCP. He is in counseling service with his case manager being XYZ.,LEGAL HISTORY: , He had an assault in December 2009, which led to his previous detention. It is unknown whether he is under legal constraints at this time.,OBJECTIVE FINDINGS: ,VITAL SIGNS: , Blood pressure is 125/75. His weight is 197 with height 5 feet 4 inches.,GENERAL:, He is cooperative, although disorganized and focusing entirely and telling me that he is here because there was some confusion in how he took his medications. He does not endorse any voices at this time.,HEENT: , His head exam is normal with normal scalp. HEENT is unremarkable. Pupils equal and reactive to light and accommodation. TMs are normal.,NECK:, Unremarkable with no masses or tenderness.,CARDIOVASCULAR:, Normal S1 and S2. No murmurs.,LUNGS:, Clear.,ABDOMEN: ,Negative with no scars.,GU: ,Not done.,RECTAL:, Not done.,DERM:, He does have a scarring of acne lesions, both face and back.,EXTREMITIES:, Otherwise negative.,NEUROLOGIC: , Cranial nerves II through X normal. Reflexes are normal and gait is unremarkable.,LABORATORY DATA: , His labs done at ABCD showed his CMP to be normal with an elevated white count of 17.2. Chest x-ray was indicated as being done and normal as was a UA and he did apparently receive hydration in the hospital with IV fluids.,ASSESSMENT: , History of hyperlipidemia with elevated triglycerides. We will maintain his gemfibrozil 600 b.i.d. and for health maintenance issues, we will also maintain just a vitamin daily and we will obtain recheck on his labs and lipid levels in one week after treatment is initiated. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

IMPRESSION: ,EEG during wakefulness, drowsiness, and sleep with synchronous video monitoring demonstrated no evidence of focal or epileptogenic activity.

impression eeg wakefulness drowsiness sleep synchronous video monitoring demonstrated evidence focal epileptogenic activity

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IMPRESSION: ,EEG during wakefulness, drowsiness, and sleep with synchronous video monitoring demonstrated no evidence of focal or epileptogenic activity. ### Response: Neurology

IMPRESSION:, Abnormal electroencephalogram revealing generalized poorly organized slowing, with more prominent slowing noted at the right compared to the left hemisphere head regions and rare sharp wave activity noted bilaterally, somewhat more prevalent on the right. Clinical correlation is suggested.

impression abnormal electroencephalogram revealing generalized poorly organized slowing prominent slowing noted right compared left hemisphere head regions rare sharp wave activity noted bilaterally somewhat prevalent right clinical correlation suggested

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: IMPRESSION:, Abnormal electroencephalogram revealing generalized poorly organized slowing, with more prominent slowing noted at the right compared to the left hemisphere head regions and rare sharp wave activity noted bilaterally, somewhat more prevalent on the right. Clinical correlation is suggested. ### Response: Neurology

INDICATION FOR CONSULTATION: , Increasing oxygen requirement.,HISTORY: , Baby boy, XYZ, is a 29-3/7-week gestation infant. His mother had premature rupture of membranes on 12/20/08. She then presented to the Labor and Delivery with symptoms of flu. The baby was then induced and delivered. The mother had a history of premature babies in the past. This baby was doing well, and then, we had a significant increasing oxygen requirement from room air up to 85%. He is now on 60% FiO2.,PHYSICAL FINDINGS,GENERAL: He appears to be pink, well perfused, and slightly jaundiced.,VITAL SIGNS: Pulse 156, 56 respiratory rate, 92% sat, and 59/28 mmHg blood pressure.,SKIN: He was pink.,He was on the high-frequency ventilator with good wiggle.,His echocardiogram showed normal structural anatomy. He has evidence for significant pulmonary hypertension. A large ductus arteriosus was seen with bidirectional shunt. A foramen ovale shunt was also noted with bidirectional shunt. The shunting for both the ductus and the foramen ovale was equal left to right and right to left.,IMPRESSION: , My impression is that baby boy, XYZ, has significant pulmonary hypertension. The best therapy for this is to continue oxygen. If clinically worsens, he may require nitric oxide. Certainly, Indocin should not be used at this time. He needs to have lower pulmonary artery pressures for that to be considered.,Thank you very much for allowing me to be involved in baby XYZ's care.

indication consultation increasing oxygen requirementhistory baby boy xyz week gestation infant mother premature rupture membranes presented labor delivery symptoms flu baby induced delivered mother history premature babies past baby well significant increasing oxygen requirement room air fiophysical findingsgeneral appears pink well perfused slightly jaundicedvital signs pulse respiratory rate sat mmhg blood pressureskin pinkhe highfrequency ventilator good wigglehis echocardiogram showed normal structural anatomy evidence significant pulmonary hypertension large ductus arteriosus seen bidirectional shunt foramen ovale shunt also noted bidirectional shunt shunting ductus foramen ovale equal left right right leftimpression impression baby boy xyz significant pulmonary hypertension best therapy continue oxygen clinically worsens may require nitric oxide certainly indocin used time needs lower pulmonary artery pressures consideredthank much allowing involved baby xyzs care

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION FOR CONSULTATION: , Increasing oxygen requirement.,HISTORY: , Baby boy, XYZ, is a 29-3/7-week gestation infant. His mother had premature rupture of membranes on 12/20/08. She then presented to the Labor and Delivery with symptoms of flu. The baby was then induced and delivered. The mother had a history of premature babies in the past. This baby was doing well, and then, we had a significant increasing oxygen requirement from room air up to 85%. He is now on 60% FiO2.,PHYSICAL FINDINGS,GENERAL: He appears to be pink, well perfused, and slightly jaundiced.,VITAL SIGNS: Pulse 156, 56 respiratory rate, 92% sat, and 59/28 mmHg blood pressure.,SKIN: He was pink.,He was on the high-frequency ventilator with good wiggle.,His echocardiogram showed normal structural anatomy. He has evidence for significant pulmonary hypertension. A large ductus arteriosus was seen with bidirectional shunt. A foramen ovale shunt was also noted with bidirectional shunt. The shunting for both the ductus and the foramen ovale was equal left to right and right to left.,IMPRESSION: , My impression is that baby boy, XYZ, has significant pulmonary hypertension. The best therapy for this is to continue oxygen. If clinically worsens, he may require nitric oxide. Certainly, Indocin should not be used at this time. He needs to have lower pulmonary artery pressures for that to be considered.,Thank you very much for allowing me to be involved in baby XYZ's care. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Consult - History and Phy., Pediatrics - Neonatal

INDICATION FOR OPERATION:, Right coronal synostosis with left frontal compensatory bossing causing plagiocephaly.,PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Syndromic craniosynostosis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Syndromic craniosynostosis.,TITLE OF OPERATION: , Anterior cranial vault reconstruction with fronto-orbital bar advancement.,SPECIMENS: , None.,DRAINS: , One subgaleal drain exiting from the left posterior aspect of wound.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, After satisfactory general endotracheal tube anesthesia was started, the patient was placed on the operating table in supine position with the head held on a horseshoe-shaped headrest and the head was prepped and draped down the routine manner. Here, the proposed scalp incision was infiltrated with 1% Xylocaine and then a zigzag scalp incision was made from one ear to the other ear, posterior to the coronal suture. Scalp incision was reflected anteriorly and then the periosteum was taken off of the bone and then the temporalis muscles were reflected anterolaterally until the anterior cranial vault was exposed and then the periorbital rim, nasion and orbital part of the zygomatic arch were all dissected out as well as the pterion. Using a craniotome, several bur holes were made; two on the either side of the midline posteriorly and then two posterolaterally. The two posterior bur holes were then connected with a punch over the superior sagittal sinus and then the craniotome was used to fashion a flap first on the left and then on the right, going paramedian along the superior sagittal sinus in the midline and then curving over the fronto-orbital bar. We then dissected superior sagittal sinus off of the inner table of the right bundle flap and then connected the right bundle flap going across the pterion on the right, which was abnormal. The pterion on the right was then run short down after removing both bone flaps and then the dura was dissected off from the orbital roofs. On the right, the orbital roof was jagged and abnormal and we had to repair a CSF leak from where the dura was punctured by the orbital roof. The orbital rim was then dissected out and then using the saw and chisels, we were able to make the releasing cuts to free up the orbital rims, zygomatic arch and then remove the orbital bar going posteriorly and then the distal bar was split in the middle and then reapproximated with a bone graft in the middle to move the orbits out a little bit and the orbital bar was held together using absorbable plate. It was then replaced and advanced and then relaxing, barrel-staving incisions were made in the bone flaps and the orbital rim and it was held on the right side with an absorbable plate to fix it in the proper position. The bone flaps were then reapproximated using absorbable plates and screws, as well as #2-0 Vicryl to secure back into place. Some of the places were also secured in the midline posteriorly, as well as off to the right where the bony defects were in place. The periosteum was then brought over the skull and fastened in place and the temporalis muscles were tacked up to the periosteum. The wounds were irrigated out. A drain was left in posteriorly and then the wounds were closed in a routine manner using Vicryl for the galea and fast-absorbing gut for the skin followed by sterile dressings. The patient tolerated the procedure well and did receive blood transfusions.

indication operation right coronal synostosis left frontal compensatory bossing causing plagiocephalypreoperative diagnosis syndromic craniosynostosispostoperative diagnosis syndromic craniosynostosistitle operation anterior cranial vault reconstruction frontoorbital bar advancementspecimens nonedrains one subgaleal drain exiting left posterior aspect wounddescription procedure satisfactory general endotracheal tube anesthesia started patient placed operating table supine position head held horseshoeshaped headrest head prepped draped routine manner proposed scalp incision infiltrated xylocaine zigzag scalp incision made one ear ear posterior coronal suture scalp incision reflected anteriorly periosteum taken bone temporalis muscles reflected anterolaterally anterior cranial vault exposed periorbital rim nasion orbital part zygomatic arch dissected well pterion using craniotome several bur holes made two either side midline posteriorly two posterolaterally two posterior bur holes connected punch superior sagittal sinus craniotome used fashion flap first left right going paramedian along superior sagittal sinus midline curving frontoorbital bar dissected superior sagittal sinus inner table right bundle flap connected right bundle flap going across pterion right abnormal pterion right run short removing bone flaps dura dissected orbital roofs right orbital roof jagged abnormal repair csf leak dura punctured orbital roof orbital rim dissected using saw chisels able make releasing cuts free orbital rims zygomatic arch remove orbital bar going posteriorly distal bar split middle reapproximated bone graft middle move orbits little bit orbital bar held together using absorbable plate replaced advanced relaxing barrelstaving incisions made bone flaps orbital rim held right side absorbable plate fix proper position bone flaps reapproximated using absorbable plates screws well vicryl secure back place places also secured midline posteriorly well right bony defects place periosteum brought skull fastened place temporalis muscles tacked periosteum wounds irrigated drain left posteriorly wounds closed routine manner using vicryl galea fastabsorbing gut skin followed sterile dressings patient tolerated procedure well receive blood transfusions

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION FOR OPERATION:, Right coronal synostosis with left frontal compensatory bossing causing plagiocephaly.,PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Syndromic craniosynostosis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: , Syndromic craniosynostosis.,TITLE OF OPERATION: , Anterior cranial vault reconstruction with fronto-orbital bar advancement.,SPECIMENS: , None.,DRAINS: , One subgaleal drain exiting from the left posterior aspect of wound.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, After satisfactory general endotracheal tube anesthesia was started, the patient was placed on the operating table in supine position with the head held on a horseshoe-shaped headrest and the head was prepped and draped down the routine manner. Here, the proposed scalp incision was infiltrated with 1% Xylocaine and then a zigzag scalp incision was made from one ear to the other ear, posterior to the coronal suture. Scalp incision was reflected anteriorly and then the periosteum was taken off of the bone and then the temporalis muscles were reflected anterolaterally until the anterior cranial vault was exposed and then the periorbital rim, nasion and orbital part of the zygomatic arch were all dissected out as well as the pterion. Using a craniotome, several bur holes were made; two on the either side of the midline posteriorly and then two posterolaterally. The two posterior bur holes were then connected with a punch over the superior sagittal sinus and then the craniotome was used to fashion a flap first on the left and then on the right, going paramedian along the superior sagittal sinus in the midline and then curving over the fronto-orbital bar. We then dissected superior sagittal sinus off of the inner table of the right bundle flap and then connected the right bundle flap going across the pterion on the right, which was abnormal. The pterion on the right was then run short down after removing both bone flaps and then the dura was dissected off from the orbital roofs. On the right, the orbital roof was jagged and abnormal and we had to repair a CSF leak from where the dura was punctured by the orbital roof. The orbital rim was then dissected out and then using the saw and chisels, we were able to make the releasing cuts to free up the orbital rims, zygomatic arch and then remove the orbital bar going posteriorly and then the distal bar was split in the middle and then reapproximated with a bone graft in the middle to move the orbits out a little bit and the orbital bar was held together using absorbable plate. It was then replaced and advanced and then relaxing, barrel-staving incisions were made in the bone flaps and the orbital rim and it was held on the right side with an absorbable plate to fix it in the proper position. The bone flaps were then reapproximated using absorbable plates and screws, as well as #2-0 Vicryl to secure back into place. Some of the places were also secured in the midline posteriorly, as well as off to the right where the bony defects were in place. The periosteum was then brought over the skull and fastened in place and the temporalis muscles were tacked up to the periosteum. The wounds were irrigated out. A drain was left in posteriorly and then the wounds were closed in a routine manner using Vicryl for the galea and fast-absorbing gut for the skin followed by sterile dressings. The patient tolerated the procedure well and did receive blood transfusions. ### Response: Neurosurgery, Surgery

INDICATION FOR STUDY: , Chest pains, CAD, and cardiomyopathy.,MEDICATIONS:, Humulin, lisinopril, furosemide, spironolactone, omeprazole, carvedilol, pravastatin, aspirin, hydrocodone, and diazepam.,BASELINE EKG: , Sinus rhythm at 71 beats per minute, left anterior fascicular block, LVBB.,PERSANTINE RESULTS: , Heart rate increased from 70 to 72. Blood pressure decreased from 160/84 to 130/78. The patient felt slightly dizziness, but there was no chest pain or EKG changes.,NUCLEAR PROTOCOL: , Same day rest/stress protocol was utilized with 12 mCi for the rest dose and 33 mCi for the stress test. 53 mg of Persantine were used, reversed with 125 mg of aminophylline.,NUCLEAR RESULTS:,1. Nuclear perfusion imaging, review of the raw projection data reveals adequate image acquisition. The resting images are normal. The post Persantine images show mildly decreased uptake in the septum. The sum score is 0.,2. The Gated SPECT shows enlarged heart with a preserved EF of 52%.,IMPRESSION:,1. Mild septal ischemia. Likely due to the left bundle-branch block.,2. Mild cardiomyopathy, EF of 52%.,3. Mild hypertension at 160/84.,4. Left bundle-branch block.,

indication study chest pains cad cardiomyopathymedications humulin lisinopril furosemide spironolactone omeprazole carvedilol pravastatin aspirin hydrocodone diazepambaseline ekg sinus rhythm beats per minute left anterior fascicular block lvbbpersantine results heart rate increased blood pressure decreased patient felt slightly dizziness chest pain ekg changesnuclear protocol day reststress protocol utilized mci rest dose mci stress test mg persantine used reversed mg aminophyllinenuclear results nuclear perfusion imaging review raw projection data reveals adequate image acquisition resting images normal post persantine images show mildly decreased uptake septum sum score gated spect shows enlarged heart preserved ef impression mild septal ischemia likely due left bundlebranch block mild cardiomyopathy ef mild hypertension left bundlebranch block

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION FOR STUDY: , Chest pains, CAD, and cardiomyopathy.,MEDICATIONS:, Humulin, lisinopril, furosemide, spironolactone, omeprazole, carvedilol, pravastatin, aspirin, hydrocodone, and diazepam.,BASELINE EKG: , Sinus rhythm at 71 beats per minute, left anterior fascicular block, LVBB.,PERSANTINE RESULTS: , Heart rate increased from 70 to 72. Blood pressure decreased from 160/84 to 130/78. The patient felt slightly dizziness, but there was no chest pain or EKG changes.,NUCLEAR PROTOCOL: , Same day rest/stress protocol was utilized with 12 mCi for the rest dose and 33 mCi for the stress test. 53 mg of Persantine were used, reversed with 125 mg of aminophylline.,NUCLEAR RESULTS:,1. Nuclear perfusion imaging, review of the raw projection data reveals adequate image acquisition. The resting images are normal. The post Persantine images show mildly decreased uptake in the septum. The sum score is 0.,2. The Gated SPECT shows enlarged heart with a preserved EF of 52%.,IMPRESSION:,1. Mild septal ischemia. Likely due to the left bundle-branch block.,2. Mild cardiomyopathy, EF of 52%.,3. Mild hypertension at 160/84.,4. Left bundle-branch block., ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATION FOR STUDY: , Elevated cardiac enzymes, fullness in chest, abnormal EKG, and risk factors.,MEDICATIONS:, Femara, verapamil, Dyazide, Hyzaar, glyburide, and metformin.,BASELINE EKG: , Sinus rhythm at 84 beats per minute, poor anteroseptal R-wave progression, mild lateral ST abnormalities.,EXERCISE RESULTS:,1. The patient exercised for 3 minutes stopping due to fatigue. No chest pain.,2. Heart rate increased from 84 to 138 or 93% of maximum predicted heart rate. Blood pressure rose from 150/88 to 210/100. There was a slight increase in her repolorization abnormalities in a non-specific pattern.,NUCLEAR PROTOCOL: ,Same day rest/stress protocol was utilized with 11 mCi for the rest dose and 33 mCi for the stress test.,NUCLEAR RESULTS:,1. Nuclear perfusion imaging, review of the raw projection data reveals adequate image acquisition. The resting images showed decreased uptake in the anterior wall. However the apex is spared of this defect. There is no significant change between rest and stress images. The sum score is 0.,2. The Gated SPECT shows moderate LVH with slightly low EF of 48%.,IMPRESSION:,1. No evidence of exercise induced ischemia at a high myocardial workload. This essentially excludes obstructive CAD as a cause of her elevated troponin.,2. Mild hypertensive cardiomyopathy with an EF of 48%.,3. Poor exercise capacity due to cardiovascular deconditioning.,4. Suboptimally controlled blood pressure on today's exam.

indication study elevated cardiac enzymes fullness chest abnormal ekg risk factorsmedications femara verapamil dyazide hyzaar glyburide metforminbaseline ekg sinus rhythm beats per minute poor anteroseptal rwave progression mild lateral st abnormalitiesexercise results patient exercised minutes stopping due fatigue chest pain heart rate increased maximum predicted heart rate blood pressure rose slight increase repolorization abnormalities nonspecific patternnuclear protocol day reststress protocol utilized mci rest dose mci stress testnuclear results nuclear perfusion imaging review raw projection data reveals adequate image acquisition resting images showed decreased uptake anterior wall however apex spared defect significant change rest stress images sum score gated spect shows moderate lvh slightly low ef impression evidence exercise induced ischemia high myocardial workload essentially excludes obstructive cad cause elevated troponin mild hypertensive cardiomyopathy ef poor exercise capacity due cardiovascular deconditioning suboptimally controlled blood pressure todays exam

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION FOR STUDY: , Elevated cardiac enzymes, fullness in chest, abnormal EKG, and risk factors.,MEDICATIONS:, Femara, verapamil, Dyazide, Hyzaar, glyburide, and metformin.,BASELINE EKG: , Sinus rhythm at 84 beats per minute, poor anteroseptal R-wave progression, mild lateral ST abnormalities.,EXERCISE RESULTS:,1. The patient exercised for 3 minutes stopping due to fatigue. No chest pain.,2. Heart rate increased from 84 to 138 or 93% of maximum predicted heart rate. Blood pressure rose from 150/88 to 210/100. There was a slight increase in her repolorization abnormalities in a non-specific pattern.,NUCLEAR PROTOCOL: ,Same day rest/stress protocol was utilized with 11 mCi for the rest dose and 33 mCi for the stress test.,NUCLEAR RESULTS:,1. Nuclear perfusion imaging, review of the raw projection data reveals adequate image acquisition. The resting images showed decreased uptake in the anterior wall. However the apex is spared of this defect. There is no significant change between rest and stress images. The sum score is 0.,2. The Gated SPECT shows moderate LVH with slightly low EF of 48%.,IMPRESSION:,1. No evidence of exercise induced ischemia at a high myocardial workload. This essentially excludes obstructive CAD as a cause of her elevated troponin.,2. Mild hypertensive cardiomyopathy with an EF of 48%.,3. Poor exercise capacity due to cardiovascular deconditioning.,4. Suboptimally controlled blood pressure on today's exam. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATION: ,

indication

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery, words_count

INDICATION: , Rectal bleeding.,PREMEDICATION:, See procedure nurse NCS form.,PROCEDURE: ,

indication rectal bleedingpremedication see procedure nurse ncs formprocedure

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Rectal bleeding.,PREMEDICATION:, See procedure nurse NCS form.,PROCEDURE: , ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

INDICATION: ,Chest pain.,INTERPRETATION: , Resting heart rate of 71, blood pressure 100/60. EKG normal sinus rhythm. The patient exercised on Bruce for 8 minutes on stage III. Peak heart rate was 151, which is 87% of the target heart rate, blood pressure of 132/54. Total METs was 10.1. EKG revealed nonspecific ST depression in inferior and lateral leads. The test was terminated because of fatigue. The patient did have chest pain during exercise that resolved after termination of the exercise.,IN SUMMARY:,1. Positive exercise ischemia with ST depression 0.5 mm.,2. Chest pain resolved after termination of exercise.,3. Good exercise duration, tolerance and double product.,NUCLEAR INTERPRETATION:,Resting and stress images were obtained with 10.1 mCi and 34.1 mCi of tetraphosphate injected intravenously by standard protocol. Nuclear myocardial perfusion scan demonstrates homogenous and uniform distribution with tracer uptake without any evidence of reversible or fixed defect. Gated SPECT revealed normal wall motion, ejection fraction of 68%. End-diastolic volume of 77, end-systolic volume of 24.,IN SUMMARY:,1. Normal nuclear myocardial perfusion scan.,2. Ejection fraction of 68% by gated SPECT.

indication chest paininterpretation resting heart rate blood pressure ekg normal sinus rhythm patient exercised bruce minutes stage iii peak heart rate target heart rate blood pressure total mets ekg revealed nonspecific st depression inferior lateral leads test terminated fatigue patient chest pain exercise resolved termination exercisein summary positive exercise ischemia st depression mm chest pain resolved termination exercise good exercise duration tolerance double productnuclear interpretationresting stress images obtained mci mci tetraphosphate injected intravenously standard protocol nuclear myocardial perfusion scan demonstrates homogenous uniform distribution tracer uptake without evidence reversible fixed defect gated spect revealed normal wall motion ejection fraction enddiastolic volume endsystolic volume summary normal nuclear myocardial perfusion scan ejection fraction gated spect

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: ,Chest pain.,INTERPRETATION: , Resting heart rate of 71, blood pressure 100/60. EKG normal sinus rhythm. The patient exercised on Bruce for 8 minutes on stage III. Peak heart rate was 151, which is 87% of the target heart rate, blood pressure of 132/54. Total METs was 10.1. EKG revealed nonspecific ST depression in inferior and lateral leads. The test was terminated because of fatigue. The patient did have chest pain during exercise that resolved after termination of the exercise.,IN SUMMARY:,1. Positive exercise ischemia with ST depression 0.5 mm.,2. Chest pain resolved after termination of exercise.,3. Good exercise duration, tolerance and double product.,NUCLEAR INTERPRETATION:,Resting and stress images were obtained with 10.1 mCi and 34.1 mCi of tetraphosphate injected intravenously by standard protocol. Nuclear myocardial perfusion scan demonstrates homogenous and uniform distribution with tracer uptake without any evidence of reversible or fixed defect. Gated SPECT revealed normal wall motion, ejection fraction of 68%. End-diastolic volume of 77, end-systolic volume of 24.,IN SUMMARY:,1. Normal nuclear myocardial perfusion scan.,2. Ejection fraction of 68% by gated SPECT. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INDICATION: , Rectal bleeding, constipation, abnormal CT scan, rule out inflammatory bowel disease.,PREMEDICATION: ,See procedure nurse NCS form.,PROCEDURE: ,

indication rectal bleeding constipation abnormal ct scan rule inflammatory bowel diseasepremedication see procedure nurse ncs formprocedure

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Rectal bleeding, constipation, abnormal CT scan, rule out inflammatory bowel disease.,PREMEDICATION: ,See procedure nurse NCS form.,PROCEDURE: , ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

INDICATION: , Aortic stenosis.,PROCEDURE: , Transesophageal echocardiogram.,INTERPRETATION: ,Procedure and complications explained to the patient in detail. Informed consent was obtained. The patient was anesthetized in the throat with lidocaine spray. Subsequently, 3 mg of IV Versed was given for sedation. The patient was positioned and transesophageal probe was introduced without any difficulty. Images were taken. The patient tolerated the procedure very well without any complications. Findings as mentioned below.,FINDINGS:,1. Left ventricle is in normal size and dimension. Normal function. Ejection fraction of 60%.,2. Left atrium and right-sided chambers are of normal size and dimension.,3. Mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonic valves are structurally normal.,4. Aortic valve reveals annular calcification with fibrocalcific valve leaflets with decreased excursion.,5. Left atrial appendage is clean without any clot or smoke effect.,6. Atrial septum intact. Study was negative.,7. Doppler study essentially benign.,8. Aorta essentially benign.,9. Aortic valve planimetry valve area average about 1.3 cm2 consistent with moderate aortic stenosis.,SUMMARY:,1. Normal left ventricular size and function.,2. Benign Doppler flow pattern.,3. Aortic valve area of 1.3 cm2 planimetry.,

indication aortic stenosisprocedure transesophageal echocardiograminterpretation procedure complications explained patient detail informed consent obtained patient anesthetized throat lidocaine spray subsequently mg iv versed given sedation patient positioned transesophageal probe introduced without difficulty images taken patient tolerated procedure well without complications findings mentioned belowfindings left ventricle normal size dimension normal function ejection fraction left atrium rightsided chambers normal size dimension mitral tricuspid pulmonic valves structurally normal aortic valve reveals annular calcification fibrocalcific valve leaflets decreased excursion left atrial appendage clean without clot smoke effect atrial septum intact study negative doppler study essentially benign aorta essentially benign aortic valve planimetry valve area average cm consistent moderate aortic stenosissummary normal left ventricular size function benign doppler flow pattern aortic valve area cm planimetry

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Aortic stenosis.,PROCEDURE: , Transesophageal echocardiogram.,INTERPRETATION: ,Procedure and complications explained to the patient in detail. Informed consent was obtained. The patient was anesthetized in the throat with lidocaine spray. Subsequently, 3 mg of IV Versed was given for sedation. The patient was positioned and transesophageal probe was introduced without any difficulty. Images were taken. The patient tolerated the procedure very well without any complications. Findings as mentioned below.,FINDINGS:,1. Left ventricle is in normal size and dimension. Normal function. Ejection fraction of 60%.,2. Left atrium and right-sided chambers are of normal size and dimension.,3. Mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonic valves are structurally normal.,4. Aortic valve reveals annular calcification with fibrocalcific valve leaflets with decreased excursion.,5. Left atrial appendage is clean without any clot or smoke effect.,6. Atrial septum intact. Study was negative.,7. Doppler study essentially benign.,8. Aorta essentially benign.,9. Aortic valve planimetry valve area average about 1.3 cm2 consistent with moderate aortic stenosis.,SUMMARY:,1. Normal left ventricular size and function.,2. Benign Doppler flow pattern.,3. Aortic valve area of 1.3 cm2 planimetry., ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATION: , Bradycardia and dizziness.,COMMENTS:,1. The patient was monitored for 24 hours.,2. The predominant rhythm was normal sinus rhythm with a minimum heart rate of 56 beats per minute and the maximum heart rate of 114 beats per minute and a mean heart rate of 86 beats per minute.,3. There were occasional premature atrial contractions seen, no supraventricular tachycardia was seen.,4. There was a frequent premature ventricular contraction seen. Between 11:00 a.m. and 11:15 a.m. the patient was in ventricular bigemini and trigemini most of the time. During rest of the monitoring period, there were just occasional premature ventricular contractions seen. No ventricular tachycardia was seen.,5. There were no pathological pauses noted.,6. The longest RR interval was 1.1 second.,7. There were no symptoms reported.

indication bradycardia dizzinesscomments patient monitored hours predominant rhythm normal sinus rhythm minimum heart rate beats per minute maximum heart rate beats per minute mean heart rate beats per minute occasional premature atrial contractions seen supraventricular tachycardia seen frequent premature ventricular contraction seen patient ventricular bigemini trigemini time rest monitoring period occasional premature ventricular contractions seen ventricular tachycardia seen pathological pauses noted longest rr interval second symptoms reported

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Bradycardia and dizziness.,COMMENTS:,1. The patient was monitored for 24 hours.,2. The predominant rhythm was normal sinus rhythm with a minimum heart rate of 56 beats per minute and the maximum heart rate of 114 beats per minute and a mean heart rate of 86 beats per minute.,3. There were occasional premature atrial contractions seen, no supraventricular tachycardia was seen.,4. There was a frequent premature ventricular contraction seen. Between 11:00 a.m. and 11:15 a.m. the patient was in ventricular bigemini and trigemini most of the time. During rest of the monitoring period, there were just occasional premature ventricular contractions seen. No ventricular tachycardia was seen.,5. There were no pathological pauses noted.,6. The longest RR interval was 1.1 second.,7. There were no symptoms reported. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INDICATION: , Chest pain.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , After informed consent was obtained from the patient, the patient was brought to the cardiology procedure room where he was hooked up to continuous hemodynamic monitoring. The patient's baseline heart rate was 85 beats per minute and blood pressure was 124/90. The patient was started on a Bruce protocol where he exercised for 11 minutes and 42 seconds achieving 12.8 METs. The patient's maximum blood pressure during this stress part was 148/80 and the patient achieved heart rate of 152 with no EKG changes, no chest pain.,FINDINGS:,1. Normal hemodynamic response to exercise.,2. No EKG changes suggestive of ischemia.,3. No chest pain during the stress test.,4. Achieved optimum METs for the exercise done and this is a normal exercise treadmill stress test.

indication chest paindescription procedure informed consent obtained patient patient brought cardiology procedure room hooked continuous hemodynamic monitoring patients baseline heart rate beats per minute blood pressure patient started bruce protocol exercised minutes seconds achieving mets patients maximum blood pressure stress part patient achieved heart rate ekg changes chest painfindings normal hemodynamic response exercise ekg changes suggestive ischemia chest pain stress test achieved optimum mets exercise done normal exercise treadmill stress test

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Chest pain.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , After informed consent was obtained from the patient, the patient was brought to the cardiology procedure room where he was hooked up to continuous hemodynamic monitoring. The patient's baseline heart rate was 85 beats per minute and blood pressure was 124/90. The patient was started on a Bruce protocol where he exercised for 11 minutes and 42 seconds achieving 12.8 METs. The patient's maximum blood pressure during this stress part was 148/80 and the patient achieved heart rate of 152 with no EKG changes, no chest pain.,FINDINGS:,1. Normal hemodynamic response to exercise.,2. No EKG changes suggestive of ischemia.,3. No chest pain during the stress test.,4. Achieved optimum METs for the exercise done and this is a normal exercise treadmill stress test. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INDICATION: , Chest pain.,TYPE OF TEST: , Adenosine with nuclear scan as the patient unable to walk on a treadmill.,INTERPRETATION:, Resting heart rate of 67, blood pressure of 129/86. EKG, normal sinus rhythm. Post-Lexiscan 0.4 mg, heart rate was 83, blood pressure 142/74. EKG remained the same. No symptoms were noted.,SUMMARY:,1. Nondiagnostic adenosine stress test.,2. Nuclear interpretation as below.,NUCLEAR INTERPRETATION:, Resting and stress images were obtained with 10.4, 33.1 mCi of tetrofosmin injected intravenously by standard protocol. Nuclear myocardial perfusion scan demonstrates homogeneous and uniform distribution of the tracer uptake without any evidence of reversible or fixed defect. Gated SPECT revealed normal wall motion, ejection fraction of 58%. End-diastolic volume of 74, end-systolic volume of 31.,IMPRESSION:,1. Normal nuclear myocardial perfusion scan.,2. Ejection fraction 58% by gated SPECT.

indication chest paintype test adenosine nuclear scan patient unable walk treadmillinterpretation resting heart rate blood pressure ekg normal sinus rhythm postlexiscan mg heart rate blood pressure ekg remained symptoms notedsummary nondiagnostic adenosine stress test nuclear interpretation belownuclear interpretation resting stress images obtained mci tetrofosmin injected intravenously standard protocol nuclear myocardial perfusion scan demonstrates homogeneous uniform distribution tracer uptake without evidence reversible fixed defect gated spect revealed normal wall motion ejection fraction enddiastolic volume endsystolic volume impression normal nuclear myocardial perfusion scan ejection fraction gated spect

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Chest pain.,TYPE OF TEST: , Adenosine with nuclear scan as the patient unable to walk on a treadmill.,INTERPRETATION:, Resting heart rate of 67, blood pressure of 129/86. EKG, normal sinus rhythm. Post-Lexiscan 0.4 mg, heart rate was 83, blood pressure 142/74. EKG remained the same. No symptoms were noted.,SUMMARY:,1. Nondiagnostic adenosine stress test.,2. Nuclear interpretation as below.,NUCLEAR INTERPRETATION:, Resting and stress images were obtained with 10.4, 33.1 mCi of tetrofosmin injected intravenously by standard protocol. Nuclear myocardial perfusion scan demonstrates homogeneous and uniform distribution of the tracer uptake without any evidence of reversible or fixed defect. Gated SPECT revealed normal wall motion, ejection fraction of 58%. End-diastolic volume of 74, end-systolic volume of 31.,IMPRESSION:,1. Normal nuclear myocardial perfusion scan.,2. Ejection fraction 58% by gated SPECT. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATION: , Iron deficiency anemia.,PROCEDURE: ,Colonoscopy with terminal ileum examination.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Normal examination.,WITHDRAWAL TIME: , 15 minutes.,SCOPE: , CF-H180AL.,MEDICATIONS: , Fentanyl 100 mcg and versed 10 mg.,PROCEDURE DETAIL: ,Following the preprocedure patient assessment the procedure, goals, risks including bleeding, perforation, missed polyp rate as well as side effects of medications and alternatives were reviewed. Questions were answered. Pause preprocedure was performed.,Following titrated intravenous sedation the flexible video endoscope was introduced into the rectum and advanced to the cecum without difficulty. The ileocecal valve looked normal. Preparation was fair allowing examination of 85% of mucosa after washing and cleaning with tap water through the scope. The terminal ileum was intubated through the ileocecal valve for a 5 cm extent. Terminal ileum mucosa looked normal.,Then the scope was withdrawn while examining the mucosa carefully including the retroflexed views of the rectum. No polyp, no diverticulum and no bleeding source was identified.,The patient was assessed upon completion of the procedure. Okay to discharge once criteria met. ,RECOMMENDATIONS:, Follow up with primary care physician.

indication iron deficiency anemiaprocedure colonoscopy terminal ileum examinationpostoperative diagnosis normal examinationwithdrawal time minutesscope cfhalmedications fentanyl mcg versed mgprocedure detail following preprocedure patient assessment procedure goals risks including bleeding perforation missed polyp rate well side effects medications alternatives reviewed questions answered pause preprocedure performedfollowing titrated intravenous sedation flexible video endoscope introduced rectum advanced cecum without difficulty ileocecal valve looked normal preparation fair allowing examination mucosa washing cleaning tap water scope terminal ileum intubated ileocecal valve cm extent terminal ileum mucosa looked normalthen scope withdrawn examining mucosa carefully including retroflexed views rectum polyp diverticulum bleeding source identifiedthe patient assessed upon completion procedure okay discharge criteria met recommendations follow primary care physician

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Iron deficiency anemia.,PROCEDURE: ,Colonoscopy with terminal ileum examination.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS:, Normal examination.,WITHDRAWAL TIME: , 15 minutes.,SCOPE: , CF-H180AL.,MEDICATIONS: , Fentanyl 100 mcg and versed 10 mg.,PROCEDURE DETAIL: ,Following the preprocedure patient assessment the procedure, goals, risks including bleeding, perforation, missed polyp rate as well as side effects of medications and alternatives were reviewed. Questions were answered. Pause preprocedure was performed.,Following titrated intravenous sedation the flexible video endoscope was introduced into the rectum and advanced to the cecum without difficulty. The ileocecal valve looked normal. Preparation was fair allowing examination of 85% of mucosa after washing and cleaning with tap water through the scope. The terminal ileum was intubated through the ileocecal valve for a 5 cm extent. Terminal ileum mucosa looked normal.,Then the scope was withdrawn while examining the mucosa carefully including the retroflexed views of the rectum. No polyp, no diverticulum and no bleeding source was identified.,The patient was assessed upon completion of the procedure. Okay to discharge once criteria met. ,RECOMMENDATIONS:, Follow up with primary care physician. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

INDICATION: , Lung carcinoma.,Whole body PET scanning was performed with 11 mCi of 18 FDG. Axial, coronal and sagittal imaging was performed over the neck, chest abdomen and pelvis.,FINDINGS:,There is normal physiologic activity identified in the myocardium, liver, spleen, ureters, kidneys and bladder.,There is abnormal FDG-avid activity identified in the posterior left paraspinal region best seen on axial images 245-257 with an SUV of 3.8, no definite bone lesion is identified on the CT scan or the bone scan dated 08/14/2007 (It may be purely lytic).,Additionally there is a significant area of activity corresponding to a mass in the region of the left hilum that is visible on the CT scan with an SUV of 18.1, the adjacent atelectasis as likely post obstructive in nature.,Additionally, although there is no definite lesion identified on CT , there is a tiny satellite nodule in the left upper lobe that is hypermetabolic with an SUV of 5.0. The spiculated density seen in the right upper lobe on the CT scan does not demonstrate FDG activity on this PET scan.,There is a hypermetabolic lymph node identified in the aorta pulmonary window with an SUV of 3.7 in the mediastinum.,IMPRESSION:,No prior PET scans for comparison, there is a large lesion identified in the area of the left hilum with an SUV of 18.1 likely causing the obstructive atelectasis seen on the CT scan.,There is a tiny satellite area of hypermetabolic FDG in the left upper lobe adjacent to the pleura with an SUV of 5.0.,There is a area of hypermetabolic activity in the left paraspinal soft tissues at the level of the lung apices which may represent a focal bone lesion. However no lesion is identified on bone scan or CT scan.,There is a hypermetabolic lymph node identified. The aorta pulmonary window with a corresponding finding on CT scan with an SUV of 3.7.

indication lung carcinomawhole body pet scanning performed mci fdg axial coronal sagittal imaging performed neck chest abdomen pelvisfindingsthere normal physiologic activity identified myocardium liver spleen ureters kidneys bladderthere abnormal fdgavid activity identified posterior left paraspinal region best seen axial images suv definite bone lesion identified ct scan bone scan dated may purely lyticadditionally significant area activity corresponding mass region left hilum visible ct scan suv adjacent atelectasis likely post obstructive natureadditionally although definite lesion identified ct tiny satellite nodule left upper lobe hypermetabolic suv spiculated density seen right upper lobe ct scan demonstrate fdg activity pet scanthere hypermetabolic lymph node identified aorta pulmonary window suv mediastinumimpressionno prior pet scans comparison large lesion identified area left hilum suv likely causing obstructive atelectasis seen ct scanthere tiny satellite area hypermetabolic fdg left upper lobe adjacent pleura suv area hypermetabolic activity left paraspinal soft tissues level lung apices may represent focal bone lesion however lesion identified bone scan ct scanthere hypermetabolic lymph node identified aorta pulmonary window corresponding finding ct scan suv

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Lung carcinoma.,Whole body PET scanning was performed with 11 mCi of 18 FDG. Axial, coronal and sagittal imaging was performed over the neck, chest abdomen and pelvis.,FINDINGS:,There is normal physiologic activity identified in the myocardium, liver, spleen, ureters, kidneys and bladder.,There is abnormal FDG-avid activity identified in the posterior left paraspinal region best seen on axial images 245-257 with an SUV of 3.8, no definite bone lesion is identified on the CT scan or the bone scan dated 08/14/2007 (It may be purely lytic).,Additionally there is a significant area of activity corresponding to a mass in the region of the left hilum that is visible on the CT scan with an SUV of 18.1, the adjacent atelectasis as likely post obstructive in nature.,Additionally, although there is no definite lesion identified on CT , there is a tiny satellite nodule in the left upper lobe that is hypermetabolic with an SUV of 5.0. The spiculated density seen in the right upper lobe on the CT scan does not demonstrate FDG activity on this PET scan.,There is a hypermetabolic lymph node identified in the aorta pulmonary window with an SUV of 3.7 in the mediastinum.,IMPRESSION:,No prior PET scans for comparison, there is a large lesion identified in the area of the left hilum with an SUV of 18.1 likely causing the obstructive atelectasis seen on the CT scan.,There is a tiny satellite area of hypermetabolic FDG in the left upper lobe adjacent to the pleura with an SUV of 5.0.,There is a area of hypermetabolic activity in the left paraspinal soft tissues at the level of the lung apices which may represent a focal bone lesion. However no lesion is identified on bone scan or CT scan.,There is a hypermetabolic lymph node identified. The aorta pulmonary window with a corresponding finding on CT scan with an SUV of 3.7. ### Response: Radiology

INDICATION: , Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: ,The patient is a pleasant 55-year-old white female with multiple myeloma. She is status post chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant. Latter occurred on 02/05/2007. At that time, she was on telemetry monitor and noticed to be in normal sinus rhythm.,As part of study protocol for investigational drug for prophylaxis against mucositis, she had electrocardiogram performed on 02/06/2007. This demonstrated underlying rhythm of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response at 125 beats per minute. She was subsequently transferred to telemetry for observation. Cardiology consultation was requested. Prior to formal consultation, the patient did have an echocardiogram performed on 02/06/2007, which showed a structurally normal heart with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function, ejection fraction of 60%, aortic sclerosis without stenosis, a trivial pericardial effusion with no evidence for immunocompromise and mild tricuspid regurgitation with normal pulmonary atrial pressures. Overall, essentially normal heart.,At the time of my evaluation, the patient felt somewhat jittery and nervous, but otherwise asymptomatic.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, Multiple myeloma, diagnosed in June of 2006, status post treatment with thalidomide and Coumadin. Subsequently, with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant.,PAST SURGICAL HISTORY: , Cosmetic surgery of the nose and forehead.,ALLERGIES:, NO KNOWN DRUG ALLERGIES.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS,1. Acyclovir 400 mg p.o. b.i.d.,2. Filgrastim 300 mcg subcutaneous daily.,3. Fluconazole 200 mg daily.,4. Levofloxacin 250 mg p.o. daily.,5. Pantoprazole 40 mg daily.,6. Ursodiol 300 mg p.o. b.i.d.,7. Investigational drug is directed ondansetron 24 mg p.r.n.,FAMILY HISTORY: , Unremarkable. Father and mother both alive in their mid 70s. Father has an unspecified heart problem and diabetes. Mother has no significant medical problems. She has one sibling, a 53-year-old sister, who has a pacemaker implanted for unknown reasons.,SOCIAL HISTORY: , The patient is married. Has four adult children. Good health. She is a lifetime nonsmoker, social alcohol drinker.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: , Prior to treatment for her multiple myeloma, she was able to walk four miles nonstop. Currently, she has dyspnea on exertion on the order of one block. She denies any orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. She denies any lower extremity edema. She has no symptomatic palpitations or tachycardia. She has never had presyncope or syncope. She denies any chest pain whatsoever. She denies any history of coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis. Her oncologic disorder is multiple myeloma. Pulmonary review of systems is negative for recurrent pneumonias, bronchitis, reactive airway disease, exposure to asbestos or tuberculosis. Gastrointestinal (GI) review of systems is negative for known gastroesophageal reflux disease, GI bleed, and hepatobiliary disease. Genitourinary review of systems is negative for nephrolithiasis or hematuria. Musculoskeletal review of systems is negative for significant arthralgias or myalgias. Central nervous system (CNS) review of systems is negative for tic, tremor, transient ischemic attack (TIA), seizure, or stroke. Psychiatric review of systems is negative for known affective or cognitive disorders.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION,GENERAL: This is a well-nourished, well-developed white female who appears her stated age and somewhat anxious.,VITAL SIGNS: She is afebrile at 97.4 degrees Fahrenheit with a heart rate ranging from 115 to 150 beats per minute, irregularly irregular. Respirations are 20 breaths per minute and blood pressure ranges from 90/59 to 107/68 mmHg. Oxygen saturation on room air is 94%.,HEENT: Benign being normocephalic and atraumatic. Extraocular motions are intact. Her sclerae are anicteric and conjunctivae are noninjected. Oral mucosa is pink and moist.,NECK: Jugular venous pulsations are normal. Carotid upstrokes are palpable bilaterally. There is no audible bruit. There is no lymphadenopathy or thyromegaly at the base of the neck.,CHEST: Cardiothoracic contour is normal. Lungs, clear to auscultation in all lung fields.,CARDIAC: Irregularly irregular rhythm and rate. S1, S2 without a significant murmur, rub, or gallop appreciated. Point of maximal impulse is normal, no right ventricular heave.,ABDOMEN: Soft with active bowel sounds. No organomegaly. No audible bruit. Nontender.,LOWER EXTREMITIES: Nonedematous. Femoral pulses were deferred.,LABORATORY DATA: , EKG, electrocardiogram showed underlying rhythm of atrial fibrillation with a rate of 125 beats per minute. Nonspecific ST-T wave abnormality is seen in the inferior leads only.,White blood cell count is 9.8, hematocrit of 30 and platelets 395. INR is 0.9. Sodium 136, potassium 4.2, BUN 43 with a creatinine of 2.0, and magnesium 2.9. AST and ALT 60 and 50. Lipase 343 and amylase 109. BNP 908. Troponin was less than 0.02.,IMPRESSION: , A middle-aged white female undergoing autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma, now with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.,Currently enrolled in a blinded study, where she may receive a drug for prophylaxis against mucositis, which has at least one reported incident of acceleration of preexisting tachycardia.,RECOMMENDATIONS,1. Atrial fibrillation. The patient is currently hemodynamically stable, tolerating her dysrhythmia. However, given the risk of thromboembolic complications, would like to convert to normal sinus rhythm if possible. Given that she was in normal sinus rhythm approximately 24 hours ago, this is relatively acute onset within the last 24 hours. We will initiate therapy with amiodarone 150 mg intravenous (IV) bolus followed by mg/minute at this juncture. If she does not have spontaneous cardioversion, we will consider either electrical cardioversion or anticoagulation with heparin within 24 hours from initiation of amiodarone.,As part of amiodarone protocol, please check TSH. Given her preexisting mild elevation of transaminases, we will follow LFTs closely, while on amiodarone.,2. Thromboembolic risk prophylaxis, as discussed above. No immediate indication for anticoagulation. If however she does not have spontaneous conversion within the next 24 hours, we will need to initiate therapy. This was discussed with Dr. X. Preference would be to run intravenous heparin with PTT of 45 during her thrombocytopenic nadir and initiation of full-dose anticoagulation once nadir is resolved.,3. Congestive heart failure. The patient is clinically euvolemic. Elevated BNP possibly secondary to infarct or renal insufficiency. Follow volume status closely. Follow serial BNPs.,4. Followup. The patient will be followed while in-house, recommendations made as clinically appropriate.

indication paroxysmal atrial fibrillationhistory present illness patient pleasant yearold white female multiple myeloma status post chemotherapy autologous stem cell transplant latter occurred time telemetry monitor noticed normal sinus rhythmas part study protocol investigational drug prophylaxis mucositis electrocardiogram performed demonstrated underlying rhythm atrial fibrillation rapid ventricular response beats per minute subsequently transferred telemetry observation cardiology consultation requested prior formal consultation patient echocardiogram performed showed structurally normal heart normal left ventricular lv systolic function ejection fraction aortic sclerosis without stenosis trivial pericardial effusion evidence immunocompromise mild tricuspid regurgitation normal pulmonary atrial pressures overall essentially normal heartat time evaluation patient felt somewhat jittery nervous otherwise asymptomaticpast medical history multiple myeloma diagnosed june status post treatment thalidomide coumadin subsequently highdose chemotherapy followed autologous stem cell transplantpast surgical history cosmetic surgery nose foreheadallergies known drug allergiescurrent medications acyclovir mg po bid filgrastim mcg subcutaneous daily fluconazole mg daily levofloxacin mg po daily pantoprazole mg daily ursodiol mg po bid investigational drug directed ondansetron mg prnfamily history unremarkable father mother alive mid father unspecified heart problem diabetes mother significant medical problems one sibling yearold sister pacemaker implanted unknown reasonssocial history patient married four adult children good health lifetime nonsmoker social alcohol drinkerreview systems prior treatment multiple myeloma able walk four miles nonstop currently dyspnea exertion order one block denies orthopnea paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea denies lower extremity edema symptomatic palpitations tachycardia never presyncope syncope denies chest pain whatsoever denies history coagulopathy bleeding diathesis oncologic disorder multiple myeloma pulmonary review systems negative recurrent pneumonias bronchitis reactive airway disease exposure asbestos tuberculosis gastrointestinal gi review systems negative known gastroesophageal reflux disease gi bleed hepatobiliary disease genitourinary review systems negative nephrolithiasis hematuria musculoskeletal review systems negative significant arthralgias myalgias central nervous system cns review systems negative tic tremor transient ischemic attack tia seizure stroke psychiatric review systems negative known affective cognitive disordersphysical examinationgeneral wellnourished welldeveloped white female appears stated age somewhat anxiousvital signs afebrile degrees fahrenheit heart rate ranging beats per minute irregularly irregular respirations breaths per minute blood pressure ranges mmhg oxygen saturation room air heent benign normocephalic atraumatic extraocular motions intact sclerae anicteric conjunctivae noninjected oral mucosa pink moistneck jugular venous pulsations normal carotid upstrokes palpable bilaterally audible bruit lymphadenopathy thyromegaly base neckchest cardiothoracic contour normal lungs clear auscultation lung fieldscardiac irregularly irregular rhythm rate without significant murmur rub gallop appreciated point maximal impulse normal right ventricular heaveabdomen soft active bowel sounds organomegaly audible bruit nontenderlower extremities nonedematous femoral pulses deferredlaboratory data ekg electrocardiogram showed underlying rhythm atrial fibrillation rate beats per minute nonspecific stt wave abnormality seen inferior leads onlywhite blood cell count hematocrit platelets inr sodium potassium bun creatinine magnesium ast alt lipase amylase bnp troponin less impression middleaged white female undergoing autologous stem cell transplant multiple myeloma paroxysmal atrial fibrillationcurrently enrolled blinded study may receive drug prophylaxis mucositis least one reported incident acceleration preexisting tachycardiarecommendations atrial fibrillation patient currently hemodynamically stable tolerating dysrhythmia however given risk thromboembolic complications would like convert normal sinus rhythm possible given normal sinus rhythm approximately hours ago relatively acute onset within last hours initiate therapy amiodarone mg intravenous iv bolus followed mgminute juncture spontaneous cardioversion consider either electrical cardioversion anticoagulation heparin within hours initiation amiodaroneas part amiodarone protocol please check tsh given preexisting mild elevation transaminases follow lfts closely amiodarone thromboembolic risk prophylaxis discussed immediate indication anticoagulation however spontaneous conversion within next hours need initiate therapy discussed dr x preference would run intravenous heparin ptt thrombocytopenic nadir initiation fulldose anticoagulation nadir resolved congestive heart failure patient clinically euvolemic elevated bnp possibly secondary infarct renal insufficiency follow volume status closely follow serial bnps followup patient followed inhouse recommendations made clinically appropriate

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: ,The patient is a pleasant 55-year-old white female with multiple myeloma. She is status post chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant. Latter occurred on 02/05/2007. At that time, she was on telemetry monitor and noticed to be in normal sinus rhythm.,As part of study protocol for investigational drug for prophylaxis against mucositis, she had electrocardiogram performed on 02/06/2007. This demonstrated underlying rhythm of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response at 125 beats per minute. She was subsequently transferred to telemetry for observation. Cardiology consultation was requested. Prior to formal consultation, the patient did have an echocardiogram performed on 02/06/2007, which showed a structurally normal heart with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function, ejection fraction of 60%, aortic sclerosis without stenosis, a trivial pericardial effusion with no evidence for immunocompromise and mild tricuspid regurgitation with normal pulmonary atrial pressures. Overall, essentially normal heart.,At the time of my evaluation, the patient felt somewhat jittery and nervous, but otherwise asymptomatic.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, Multiple myeloma, diagnosed in June of 2006, status post treatment with thalidomide and Coumadin. Subsequently, with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant.,PAST SURGICAL HISTORY: , Cosmetic surgery of the nose and forehead.,ALLERGIES:, NO KNOWN DRUG ALLERGIES.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS,1. Acyclovir 400 mg p.o. b.i.d.,2. Filgrastim 300 mcg subcutaneous daily.,3. Fluconazole 200 mg daily.,4. Levofloxacin 250 mg p.o. daily.,5. Pantoprazole 40 mg daily.,6. Ursodiol 300 mg p.o. b.i.d.,7. Investigational drug is directed ondansetron 24 mg p.r.n.,FAMILY HISTORY: , Unremarkable. Father and mother both alive in their mid 70s. Father has an unspecified heart problem and diabetes. Mother has no significant medical problems. She has one sibling, a 53-year-old sister, who has a pacemaker implanted for unknown reasons.,SOCIAL HISTORY: , The patient is married. Has four adult children. Good health. She is a lifetime nonsmoker, social alcohol drinker.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: , Prior to treatment for her multiple myeloma, she was able to walk four miles nonstop. Currently, she has dyspnea on exertion on the order of one block. She denies any orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. She denies any lower extremity edema. She has no symptomatic palpitations or tachycardia. She has never had presyncope or syncope. She denies any chest pain whatsoever. She denies any history of coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis. Her oncologic disorder is multiple myeloma. Pulmonary review of systems is negative for recurrent pneumonias, bronchitis, reactive airway disease, exposure to asbestos or tuberculosis. Gastrointestinal (GI) review of systems is negative for known gastroesophageal reflux disease, GI bleed, and hepatobiliary disease. Genitourinary review of systems is negative for nephrolithiasis or hematuria. Musculoskeletal review of systems is negative for significant arthralgias or myalgias. Central nervous system (CNS) review of systems is negative for tic, tremor, transient ischemic attack (TIA), seizure, or stroke. Psychiatric review of systems is negative for known affective or cognitive disorders.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION,GENERAL: This is a well-nourished, well-developed white female who appears her stated age and somewhat anxious.,VITAL SIGNS: She is afebrile at 97.4 degrees Fahrenheit with a heart rate ranging from 115 to 150 beats per minute, irregularly irregular. Respirations are 20 breaths per minute and blood pressure ranges from 90/59 to 107/68 mmHg. Oxygen saturation on room air is 94%.,HEENT: Benign being normocephalic and atraumatic. Extraocular motions are intact. Her sclerae are anicteric and conjunctivae are noninjected. Oral mucosa is pink and moist.,NECK: Jugular venous pulsations are normal. Carotid upstrokes are palpable bilaterally. There is no audible bruit. There is no lymphadenopathy or thyromegaly at the base of the neck.,CHEST: Cardiothoracic contour is normal. Lungs, clear to auscultation in all lung fields.,CARDIAC: Irregularly irregular rhythm and rate. S1, S2 without a significant murmur, rub, or gallop appreciated. Point of maximal impulse is normal, no right ventricular heave.,ABDOMEN: Soft with active bowel sounds. No organomegaly. No audible bruit. Nontender.,LOWER EXTREMITIES: Nonedematous. Femoral pulses were deferred.,LABORATORY DATA: , EKG, electrocardiogram showed underlying rhythm of atrial fibrillation with a rate of 125 beats per minute. Nonspecific ST-T wave abnormality is seen in the inferior leads only.,White blood cell count is 9.8, hematocrit of 30 and platelets 395. INR is 0.9. Sodium 136, potassium 4.2, BUN 43 with a creatinine of 2.0, and magnesium 2.9. AST and ALT 60 and 50. Lipase 343 and amylase 109. BNP 908. Troponin was less than 0.02.,IMPRESSION: , A middle-aged white female undergoing autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma, now with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.,Currently enrolled in a blinded study, where she may receive a drug for prophylaxis against mucositis, which has at least one reported incident of acceleration of preexisting tachycardia.,RECOMMENDATIONS,1. Atrial fibrillation. The patient is currently hemodynamically stable, tolerating her dysrhythmia. However, given the risk of thromboembolic complications, would like to convert to normal sinus rhythm if possible. Given that she was in normal sinus rhythm approximately 24 hours ago, this is relatively acute onset within the last 24 hours. We will initiate therapy with amiodarone 150 mg intravenous (IV) bolus followed by mg/minute at this juncture. If she does not have spontaneous cardioversion, we will consider either electrical cardioversion or anticoagulation with heparin within 24 hours from initiation of amiodarone.,As part of amiodarone protocol, please check TSH. Given her preexisting mild elevation of transaminases, we will follow LFTs closely, while on amiodarone.,2. Thromboembolic risk prophylaxis, as discussed above. No immediate indication for anticoagulation. If however she does not have spontaneous conversion within the next 24 hours, we will need to initiate therapy. This was discussed with Dr. X. Preference would be to run intravenous heparin with PTT of 45 during her thrombocytopenic nadir and initiation of full-dose anticoagulation once nadir is resolved.,3. Congestive heart failure. The patient is clinically euvolemic. Elevated BNP possibly secondary to infarct or renal insufficiency. Follow volume status closely. Follow serial BNPs.,4. Followup. The patient will be followed while in-house, recommendations made as clinically appropriate. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Consult - History and Phy.

INDICATION: , Syncope.,HOLTER MONITOR SUMMARY ANALYSIS: , Analyzed for approximately 23 hours 57 minutes and artefact noted for approximately 23 seconds. Total beats of 108,489, heart rate minimum of approximately 54 beats per minutes at 7 a.m. and maximum of 106 beats per minute at approximately 4 p.m. Average heart rate is approximately 75 beats per minute, total of 31 to bradycardia, longest being 225 beats at approximately 7 in the morning, minimum rate of 43 beats per minute at approximately 01:40 a.m. Total ventricular events of 64, primarily premature ventricular contraction and supraventricular events total beats of 9 atrial premature contractions. No significant ST elevation noted and ST depression noted only in one channel for approximately three minutes for a maximum of 2.7 mm.,IMPRESSION OF THE FINDINGS: , Predominant sinus rhythm with occasional premature ventricular contraction, occasional atrial premature contractions and Mobitz type 1 Wenckebach, several episodes, Mobitz type II, 3 to 2 AV conduction disease noted as well approximately two episodes and one episode of atrial bigeminy noted. No significant pauses noted.

indication syncopeholter monitor summary analysis analyzed approximately hours minutes artefact noted approximately seconds total beats heart rate minimum approximately beats per minutes maximum beats per minute approximately pm average heart rate approximately beats per minute total bradycardia longest beats approximately morning minimum rate beats per minute approximately total ventricular events primarily premature ventricular contraction supraventricular events total beats atrial premature contractions significant st elevation noted st depression noted one channel approximately three minutes maximum mmimpression findings predominant sinus rhythm occasional premature ventricular contraction occasional atrial premature contractions mobitz type wenckebach several episodes mobitz type ii av conduction disease noted well approximately two episodes one episode atrial bigeminy noted significant pauses noted

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , Syncope.,HOLTER MONITOR SUMMARY ANALYSIS: , Analyzed for approximately 23 hours 57 minutes and artefact noted for approximately 23 seconds. Total beats of 108,489, heart rate minimum of approximately 54 beats per minutes at 7 a.m. and maximum of 106 beats per minute at approximately 4 p.m. Average heart rate is approximately 75 beats per minute, total of 31 to bradycardia, longest being 225 beats at approximately 7 in the morning, minimum rate of 43 beats per minute at approximately 01:40 a.m. Total ventricular events of 64, primarily premature ventricular contraction and supraventricular events total beats of 9 atrial premature contractions. No significant ST elevation noted and ST depression noted only in one channel for approximately three minutes for a maximum of 2.7 mm.,IMPRESSION OF THE FINDINGS: , Predominant sinus rhythm with occasional premature ventricular contraction, occasional atrial premature contractions and Mobitz type 1 Wenckebach, several episodes, Mobitz type II, 3 to 2 AV conduction disease noted as well approximately two episodes and one episode of atrial bigeminy noted. No significant pauses noted. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INDICATION: , This 69-year-old man is undergoing a preoperative evaluation for anticipated prostate surgery. He is having a transurethral prostate resection performed by Dr. X for treatment of severely symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy. He has recently completed radiation therapy to T11 for a plasmacytoma. He has recently complained of left anterior chest pain, which radiates down the left upper arm towards the elbow. This occurs during quiet periods such as in bed at night. It may last all night and still be present in the morning. It usually dissipates as the day progresses. There are no obvious triggers and there are no obvious alleviating factors. The patient has no known cardiac risk factors. He is currently taking Avodart 0.5 mg daily, Wellbutrin 300 mg daily, Xanax 0.25 mg p.r.n., Uroxatral 10 mg daily, and omeprazole 20 mg daily.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , On physical examination, the patient appears pale and fatigued. He is 66 inches tall, 205 pounds for a body mass index of 32. His resting heart rate is 80. His resting blood pressure is 120/84. His lungs are clear. His heart exam reveals a regular rhythm and normal S1 and S2 without murmur, gallop, or rub appreciated. The carotid upstroke is normal with no bruit identified. The peripheral pulses are intact. The resting electrocardiogram showed a sinus rhythm at 68 beats per minute and is normal.,DESCRIPTION: , The patient exercised according to the standard Bruce protocol stopping at 4 minutes and 39 seconds with fatigue. He did not experience his left anterior chest pain with exercise. He did achieve a maximal heart rate of 129 beats per minute, which is 85% of his maximal predicted heart rate. His maximal blood pressure was 200/84, double product of 24,000 and achieving 7 METs. As noted the resting electrocardiogram was normal. With exercise, there were no significant deviations from baseline and no arrhythmias.,CONCLUSION:,1. Reduced exercise capacity for age.,2. No chest pain with exercise.,3. No significant ST segment changes with exercise.,4. Symptoms of left anterior chest pain were not provoked with exercise.,5. Hypertensive response noted with exercise.

indication yearold man undergoing preoperative evaluation anticipated prostate surgery transurethral prostate resection performed dr x treatment severely symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy recently completed radiation therapy plasmacytoma recently complained left anterior chest pain radiates left upper arm towards elbow occurs quiet periods bed night may last night still present morning usually dissipates day progresses obvious triggers obvious alleviating factors patient known cardiac risk factors currently taking avodart mg daily wellbutrin mg daily xanax mg prn uroxatral mg daily omeprazole mg dailyphysical examination physical examination patient appears pale fatigued inches tall pounds body mass index resting heart rate resting blood pressure lungs clear heart exam reveals regular rhythm normal without murmur gallop rub appreciated carotid upstroke normal bruit identified peripheral pulses intact resting electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm beats per minute normaldescription patient exercised according standard bruce protocol stopping minutes seconds fatigue experience left anterior chest pain exercise achieve maximal heart rate beats per minute maximal predicted heart rate maximal blood pressure double product achieving mets noted resting electrocardiogram normal exercise significant deviations baseline arrhythmiasconclusion reduced exercise capacity age chest pain exercise significant st segment changes exercise symptoms left anterior chest pain provoked exercise hypertensive response noted exercise

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION: , This 69-year-old man is undergoing a preoperative evaluation for anticipated prostate surgery. He is having a transurethral prostate resection performed by Dr. X for treatment of severely symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy. He has recently completed radiation therapy to T11 for a plasmacytoma. He has recently complained of left anterior chest pain, which radiates down the left upper arm towards the elbow. This occurs during quiet periods such as in bed at night. It may last all night and still be present in the morning. It usually dissipates as the day progresses. There are no obvious triggers and there are no obvious alleviating factors. The patient has no known cardiac risk factors. He is currently taking Avodart 0.5 mg daily, Wellbutrin 300 mg daily, Xanax 0.25 mg p.r.n., Uroxatral 10 mg daily, and omeprazole 20 mg daily.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , On physical examination, the patient appears pale and fatigued. He is 66 inches tall, 205 pounds for a body mass index of 32. His resting heart rate is 80. His resting blood pressure is 120/84. His lungs are clear. His heart exam reveals a regular rhythm and normal S1 and S2 without murmur, gallop, or rub appreciated. The carotid upstroke is normal with no bruit identified. The peripheral pulses are intact. The resting electrocardiogram showed a sinus rhythm at 68 beats per minute and is normal.,DESCRIPTION: , The patient exercised according to the standard Bruce protocol stopping at 4 minutes and 39 seconds with fatigue. He did not experience his left anterior chest pain with exercise. He did achieve a maximal heart rate of 129 beats per minute, which is 85% of his maximal predicted heart rate. His maximal blood pressure was 200/84, double product of 24,000 and achieving 7 METs. As noted the resting electrocardiogram was normal. With exercise, there were no significant deviations from baseline and no arrhythmias.,CONCLUSION:,1. Reduced exercise capacity for age.,2. No chest pain with exercise.,3. No significant ST segment changes with exercise.,4. Symptoms of left anterior chest pain were not provoked with exercise.,5. Hypertensive response noted with exercise. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INDICATION:, Acute coronary syndrome.,CONSENT FORM: , The procedure of cardiac catheterization/PCI risks included but not restricted to death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, emergent open heart surgery, bleeding, hematoma, limb loss, renal failure requiring dialysis, blood loss, infection had been explained to him. He understands. All questions answered and is willing to sign consent.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Selective coronary angiography of the right coronary artery, left main LAD, left circumflex artery, left ventricular catheterization, left ventricular angiography, angioplasty of totally occluded mid RCA, arthrectomy using 6-French catheter, stenting of the mid RCA, stenting of the proximal RCA, femoral angiography and Perclose hemostasis.,NARRATIVE: , The patient was brought to the cardiac catheterization laboratory in a fasting state. Both groins were draped and sterilized in the usual fashion. Local anesthesia was achieved with 2% lidocaine to the right groin area and a #6-French femoral sheath was inserted via modified Seldinger technique in the right common femoral artery. Selective coronary angiography was performed with #6 French JL4 catheter for the left coronary system and a #6 French JR4 catheter of the right coronary artery. Left ventricular catheterization and angiography was performed at the end of the procedure with a #6-French angle pigtail catheter.,FINDINGS,1. Hemodynamics systemic blood pressure 140/70 mmHg. LVEDP at the end of the procedure was 13 mmHg.,2. The left main coronary artery is a large with mild diffuse disease in the distal third resulting in less than 20% angiographic stenosis at the take off of the left circumflex artery. The left circumflex artery is a large caliber vessel with diffuse disease in the ostium of the proximal segment resulting in less than 30% angiographic stenosis. The left circumflex artery gives rise to a high small obtuse marginal branch that has high moderate-to-severe ostium. The rest of the left circumflex artery has mild diffuse disease and it gives rise to a second large obtuse marginal branch that bifurcates into an upper and lower trunk.,The LAD is calcified and diffusely disease in the proximal and mid portion. There is mild nonobstructive disease in the proximal LAD resulting in less than 20% angiographic stenosis.,3. The right coronary artery is dominant. It is septal to be occluded in the mid portion.,The findings were discussed with the patient and she opted for PCI. Angiomax bolus was started. The ACT was checked. It was higher in 300. I have given the patient 600 mg of oral Plavix.,The right coronary artery was engaged using a #6-French JR4 guide catheter. I was unable to cross through this lesion using a BMW wire and a 3.0x8 mm balloon support. I was unable to cross with this lesion using a whisper wire. I was unable to cross with this lesion using Cross-IT 100 wire. I have also used second #6-French Amplatz right I guide catheter. At one time, I have lost flow in the distal vessel. The patient experienced severe chest pain, ST-segment elevation, bradycardia, and hypotension, which responded to intravenous fluids and atropine along with intravenous dopamine.,Dr. X was notified.,Eventually, an Asahi grand slam wire using the same 3.0 x 8 mm Voyager balloon support, I was able to cross into the distal vessel. I have performed careful balloon angioplasty of the mid RCA. I have given nitroglycerin under the nursing several times during the procedure.,I then performed arthrectomy using #5-French export catheter.,I performed more balloon predilation using a 3.0 x16 mm Voyager balloon. I then deployed 4.0 x15 mm, excised, and across the mid RCA at 18 atmospheres with good angiographic result. Proximal to the proximal edge of the stent, there was still some persistent haziness most likely just diseased artery/diffuse plaquing. I decided to cover this segment using a second 4.0 x 15 mm, excised, and two stents were overlapped, the overlap was postdilated using the same stent delivery balloon at high pressure with excellent angiographic result.,Left ventricular catheterization was performed with #6-French angle pigtail catheter. The left ventricle is rather smaller in size. The mid inferior wall is minimally hypokinetic, ejection fraction is 70%. There is no evidence of aortic wall stenosis or mitral regurgitation.,Femoral angiography revealed that the entry point was above the bifurcation of the right common femoral artery and I have performed this as Perclose hemostasis.,CONCLUSIONS,1. Normal left ventricular size and function. Ejection fraction is 65% to 70%. No MR.,2. Successful angioplasty and stenting of the subtotally closed mid RCA. This was hard, organized thrombus, very difficult to penetrate. I have deployed two overlapping 4.0 x15 mm excised and with excellent angiographic result. The RCA is dominant.,3. No moderate disease in the distal left main. Moderate disease in the ostium of the left circumflex artery. Mild disease in the proximal LAD.,PLAN: , Recommend smoking cessation. Continue aspirin lifelong and continue Plavix for at least 12 months.

indication acute coronary syndromeconsent form procedure cardiac catheterizationpci risks included restricted death myocardial infarction cerebrovascular accident emergent open heart surgery bleeding hematoma limb loss renal failure requiring dialysis blood loss infection explained understands questions answered willing sign consentprocedure performed selective coronary angiography right coronary artery left main lad left circumflex artery left ventricular catheterization left ventricular angiography angioplasty totally occluded mid rca arthrectomy using french catheter stenting mid rca stenting proximal rca femoral angiography perclose hemostasisnarrative patient brought cardiac catheterization laboratory fasting state groins draped sterilized usual fashion local anesthesia achieved lidocaine right groin area french femoral sheath inserted via modified seldinger technique right common femoral artery selective coronary angiography performed french jl catheter left coronary system french jr catheter right coronary artery left ventricular catheterization angiography performed end procedure french angle pigtail catheterfindings hemodynamics systemic blood pressure mmhg lvedp end procedure mmhg left main coronary artery large mild diffuse disease distal third resulting less angiographic stenosis take left circumflex artery left circumflex artery large caliber vessel diffuse disease ostium proximal segment resulting less angiographic stenosis left circumflex artery gives rise high small obtuse marginal branch high moderatetosevere ostium rest left circumflex artery mild diffuse disease gives rise second large obtuse marginal branch bifurcates upper lower trunkthe lad calcified diffusely disease proximal mid portion mild nonobstructive disease proximal lad resulting less angiographic stenosis right coronary artery dominant septal occluded mid portionthe findings discussed patient opted pci angiomax bolus started act checked higher given patient mg oral plavixthe right coronary artery engaged using french jr guide catheter unable cross lesion using bmw wire x mm balloon support unable cross lesion using whisper wire unable cross lesion using crossit wire also used second french amplatz right guide catheter one time lost flow distal vessel patient experienced severe chest pain stsegment elevation bradycardia hypotension responded intravenous fluids atropine along intravenous dopaminedr x notifiedeventually asahi grand slam wire using x mm voyager balloon support able cross distal vessel performed careful balloon angioplasty mid rca given nitroglycerin nursing several times procedurei performed arthrectomy using french export catheteri performed balloon predilation using x mm voyager balloon deployed x mm excised across mid rca atmospheres good angiographic result proximal proximal edge stent still persistent haziness likely diseased arterydiffuse plaquing decided cover segment using second x mm excised two stents overlapped overlap postdilated using stent delivery balloon high pressure excellent angiographic resultleft ventricular catheterization performed french angle pigtail catheter left ventricle rather smaller size mid inferior wall minimally hypokinetic ejection fraction evidence aortic wall stenosis mitral regurgitationfemoral angiography revealed entry point bifurcation right common femoral artery performed perclose hemostasisconclusions normal left ventricular size function ejection fraction mr successful angioplasty stenting subtotally closed mid rca hard organized thrombus difficult penetrate deployed two overlapping x mm excised excellent angiographic result rca dominant moderate disease distal left main moderate disease ostium left circumflex artery mild disease proximal ladplan recommend smoking cessation continue aspirin lifelong continue plavix least months

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION:, Acute coronary syndrome.,CONSENT FORM: , The procedure of cardiac catheterization/PCI risks included but not restricted to death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, emergent open heart surgery, bleeding, hematoma, limb loss, renal failure requiring dialysis, blood loss, infection had been explained to him. He understands. All questions answered and is willing to sign consent.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Selective coronary angiography of the right coronary artery, left main LAD, left circumflex artery, left ventricular catheterization, left ventricular angiography, angioplasty of totally occluded mid RCA, arthrectomy using 6-French catheter, stenting of the mid RCA, stenting of the proximal RCA, femoral angiography and Perclose hemostasis.,NARRATIVE: , The patient was brought to the cardiac catheterization laboratory in a fasting state. Both groins were draped and sterilized in the usual fashion. Local anesthesia was achieved with 2% lidocaine to the right groin area and a #6-French femoral sheath was inserted via modified Seldinger technique in the right common femoral artery. Selective coronary angiography was performed with #6 French JL4 catheter for the left coronary system and a #6 French JR4 catheter of the right coronary artery. Left ventricular catheterization and angiography was performed at the end of the procedure with a #6-French angle pigtail catheter.,FINDINGS,1. Hemodynamics systemic blood pressure 140/70 mmHg. LVEDP at the end of the procedure was 13 mmHg.,2. The left main coronary artery is a large with mild diffuse disease in the distal third resulting in less than 20% angiographic stenosis at the take off of the left circumflex artery. The left circumflex artery is a large caliber vessel with diffuse disease in the ostium of the proximal segment resulting in less than 30% angiographic stenosis. The left circumflex artery gives rise to a high small obtuse marginal branch that has high moderate-to-severe ostium. The rest of the left circumflex artery has mild diffuse disease and it gives rise to a second large obtuse marginal branch that bifurcates into an upper and lower trunk.,The LAD is calcified and diffusely disease in the proximal and mid portion. There is mild nonobstructive disease in the proximal LAD resulting in less than 20% angiographic stenosis.,3. The right coronary artery is dominant. It is septal to be occluded in the mid portion.,The findings were discussed with the patient and she opted for PCI. Angiomax bolus was started. The ACT was checked. It was higher in 300. I have given the patient 600 mg of oral Plavix.,The right coronary artery was engaged using a #6-French JR4 guide catheter. I was unable to cross through this lesion using a BMW wire and a 3.0x8 mm balloon support. I was unable to cross with this lesion using a whisper wire. I was unable to cross with this lesion using Cross-IT 100 wire. I have also used second #6-French Amplatz right I guide catheter. At one time, I have lost flow in the distal vessel. The patient experienced severe chest pain, ST-segment elevation, bradycardia, and hypotension, which responded to intravenous fluids and atropine along with intravenous dopamine.,Dr. X was notified.,Eventually, an Asahi grand slam wire using the same 3.0 x 8 mm Voyager balloon support, I was able to cross into the distal vessel. I have performed careful balloon angioplasty of the mid RCA. I have given nitroglycerin under the nursing several times during the procedure.,I then performed arthrectomy using #5-French export catheter.,I performed more balloon predilation using a 3.0 x16 mm Voyager balloon. I then deployed 4.0 x15 mm, excised, and across the mid RCA at 18 atmospheres with good angiographic result. Proximal to the proximal edge of the stent, there was still some persistent haziness most likely just diseased artery/diffuse plaquing. I decided to cover this segment using a second 4.0 x 15 mm, excised, and two stents were overlapped, the overlap was postdilated using the same stent delivery balloon at high pressure with excellent angiographic result.,Left ventricular catheterization was performed with #6-French angle pigtail catheter. The left ventricle is rather smaller in size. The mid inferior wall is minimally hypokinetic, ejection fraction is 70%. There is no evidence of aortic wall stenosis or mitral regurgitation.,Femoral angiography revealed that the entry point was above the bifurcation of the right common femoral artery and I have performed this as Perclose hemostasis.,CONCLUSIONS,1. Normal left ventricular size and function. Ejection fraction is 65% to 70%. No MR.,2. Successful angioplasty and stenting of the subtotally closed mid RCA. This was hard, organized thrombus, very difficult to penetrate. I have deployed two overlapping 4.0 x15 mm excised and with excellent angiographic result. The RCA is dominant.,3. No moderate disease in the distal left main. Moderate disease in the ostium of the left circumflex artery. Mild disease in the proximal LAD.,PLAN: , Recommend smoking cessation. Continue aspirin lifelong and continue Plavix for at least 12 months. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATION:, Coronary artery disease, severe aortic stenosis by echo.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Left heart catheterization.,2. Right heart catheterization.,3. Selective coronary angiography.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was explained about all the risks, benefits and alternatives to the procedure. The patient agreed to proceed and informed consent was signed.,Both groins were prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. After local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, 6-French sheath was inserted in the right femoral artery and 7-French sheath was inserted in the right femoral vein. Then right heart cath was performed using 7-French Swan-Ganz catheter. Catheter was placed in the pulmonary capillary wedge position. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, PA pressure was obtained, cardiac output was obtained, then RV, RA pressures were obtained. The right heart catheter _______ pulled out. Then selective coronary angiography was performed using 6-French JL4 and 6-French 3DRC catheter. Then attempt was made to cross the aortic valve with 6-French pigtail catheter, but it was unsuccessful. After the procedure, catheters were pulled out, sheath was pulled out and hemostasis was obtained by manual pressure. The patient tolerated the procedure well. There were no complications.,HEMODYNAMICS:,1. Cardiac output was 4.9 per liter per minute. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, mean was 7, PA pressure was 20/14, RV 26/5, RA mean pressure was 5.,2. Coronary angiography, left main is calcified _______ dense complex.,3. LAD proximal 70% calcified stenosis present and patent stent to the mid LAD and diagonal 1 is a moderate-size vessel, has 70% stenosis. Left circumflex has diffuse luminal irregularities. OM1 has 70% stenosis, is a moderate-size vessel. Right coronary is dominant and has minimal luminal irregularities.,SUMMARY: , Three-vessel coronary artery disease with aortic stenosis by echo with normal pulmonary artery systolic pressure.,RECOMMENDATION: , Aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass surgery.

indication coronary artery disease severe aortic stenosis echoprocedure performed left heart catheterization right heart catheterization selective coronary angiographyprocedure patient explained risks benefits alternatives procedure patient agreed proceed informed consent signedboth groins prepped draped usual sterile fashion local anesthesia lidocaine french sheath inserted right femoral artery french sheath inserted right femoral vein right heart cath performed using french swanganz catheter catheter placed pulmonary capillary wedge position pulmonary capillary wedge pressure pa pressure obtained cardiac output obtained rv ra pressures obtained right heart catheter _______ pulled selective coronary angiography performed using french jl french drc catheter attempt made cross aortic valve french pigtail catheter unsuccessful procedure catheters pulled sheath pulled hemostasis obtained manual pressure patient tolerated procedure well complicationshemodynamics cardiac output per liter per minute pulmonary capillary wedge pressure mean pa pressure rv ra mean pressure coronary angiography left main calcified _______ dense complex lad proximal calcified stenosis present patent stent mid lad diagonal moderatesize vessel stenosis left circumflex diffuse luminal irregularities om stenosis moderatesize vessel right coronary dominant minimal luminal irregularitiessummary threevessel coronary artery disease aortic stenosis echo normal pulmonary artery systolic pressurerecommendation aortic valve replacement coronary artery bypass surgery

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION:, Coronary artery disease, severe aortic stenosis by echo.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:,1. Left heart catheterization.,2. Right heart catheterization.,3. Selective coronary angiography.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was explained about all the risks, benefits and alternatives to the procedure. The patient agreed to proceed and informed consent was signed.,Both groins were prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. After local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, 6-French sheath was inserted in the right femoral artery and 7-French sheath was inserted in the right femoral vein. Then right heart cath was performed using 7-French Swan-Ganz catheter. Catheter was placed in the pulmonary capillary wedge position. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, PA pressure was obtained, cardiac output was obtained, then RV, RA pressures were obtained. The right heart catheter _______ pulled out. Then selective coronary angiography was performed using 6-French JL4 and 6-French 3DRC catheter. Then attempt was made to cross the aortic valve with 6-French pigtail catheter, but it was unsuccessful. After the procedure, catheters were pulled out, sheath was pulled out and hemostasis was obtained by manual pressure. The patient tolerated the procedure well. There were no complications.,HEMODYNAMICS:,1. Cardiac output was 4.9 per liter per minute. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, mean was 7, PA pressure was 20/14, RV 26/5, RA mean pressure was 5.,2. Coronary angiography, left main is calcified _______ dense complex.,3. LAD proximal 70% calcified stenosis present and patent stent to the mid LAD and diagonal 1 is a moderate-size vessel, has 70% stenosis. Left circumflex has diffuse luminal irregularities. OM1 has 70% stenosis, is a moderate-size vessel. Right coronary is dominant and has minimal luminal irregularities.,SUMMARY: , Three-vessel coronary artery disease with aortic stenosis by echo with normal pulmonary artery systolic pressure.,RECOMMENDATION: , Aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass surgery. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATION:, Prostate Cancer.,TECHNIQUE:, 3.5 hours following the intravenous administration of 26.5 mCi of Technetium 99m MDP, the skeleton was imaged in the anterior and posterior projections.,FINDINGS:, There is a focus of abnormal increased tracer activity overlying the right parietal region of the skull. The uptake in the remainder of the skeleton is within normal limits. The kidneys image normally. There is increased activity in the urinary bladder suggesting possible urinary retention.,CONCLUSION:,1. Focus of abnormal increased tracer activity overlying the right parietal region of the skull. CT scanning of magnetic resonance imaging of the skull and brain could be done for further assessment if it is clinically indicated.,2. There is probably some degree of urinary retention.,

indication prostate cancertechnique hours following intravenous administration mci technetium mdp skeleton imaged anterior posterior projectionsfindings focus abnormal increased tracer activity overlying right parietal region skull uptake remainder skeleton within normal limits kidneys image normally increased activity urinary bladder suggesting possible urinary retentionconclusion focus abnormal increased tracer activity overlying right parietal region skull ct scanning magnetic resonance imaging skull brain could done assessment clinically indicated probably degree urinary retention

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATION:, Prostate Cancer.,TECHNIQUE:, 3.5 hours following the intravenous administration of 26.5 mCi of Technetium 99m MDP, the skeleton was imaged in the anterior and posterior projections.,FINDINGS:, There is a focus of abnormal increased tracer activity overlying the right parietal region of the skull. The uptake in the remainder of the skeleton is within normal limits. The kidneys image normally. There is increased activity in the urinary bladder suggesting possible urinary retention.,CONCLUSION:,1. Focus of abnormal increased tracer activity overlying the right parietal region of the skull. CT scanning of magnetic resonance imaging of the skull and brain could be done for further assessment if it is clinically indicated.,2. There is probably some degree of urinary retention., ### Response: Radiology, Urology

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , A 79-year-old Filipino woman referred for colonoscopy secondary to heme-positive stools. Procedure done to rule out generalized diverticular change, colitis, and neoplasia.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was explained the procedure in detail, possible complications including infection, perforation, adverse reaction of medication, and bleeding. Informed consent was signed by the patient.,With the patient in left decubitus position, had received a cumulative dose of 4 mg of Versed and 75 mg of Demerol, using Olympus video colonoscope under direct visualization was advanced to the cecum. Photodocumentation of appendiceal orifice and the ileocecal valve obtained. Cecum was slightly obscured with stool but the colon itself was adequately prepped. There was no evidence of overt colitis, telangiectasia, or overt neoplasia. There was moderately severe diverticular change, which was present throughout the colon and photodocumented. The rectal mucosa was normal and retroflexed with mild internal hemorrhoids. The patient tolerated the procedure well without any complications.,IMPRESSION:,1. Colonoscopy to the cecum with adequate preparation.,2. Long tortuous spastic colon.,3. Moderately severe diverticular changes present throughout.,4. Mild internal hemorrhoids.,RECOMMENDATIONS:,1. Clear liquid diet today.,2. Follow up with primary care physician as scheduled from time to time.,3. Increase fiber in diet, strongly consider fiber supplementation.

indications procedure yearold filipino woman referred colonoscopy secondary hemepositive stools procedure done rule generalized diverticular change colitis neoplasiadescription procedure patient explained procedure detail possible complications including infection perforation adverse reaction medication bleeding informed consent signed patientwith patient left decubitus position received cumulative dose mg versed mg demerol using olympus video colonoscope direct visualization advanced cecum photodocumentation appendiceal orifice ileocecal valve obtained cecum slightly obscured stool colon adequately prepped evidence overt colitis telangiectasia overt neoplasia moderately severe diverticular change present throughout colon photodocumented rectal mucosa normal retroflexed mild internal hemorrhoids patient tolerated procedure well without complicationsimpression colonoscopy cecum adequate preparation long tortuous spastic colon moderately severe diverticular changes present throughout mild internal hemorrhoidsrecommendations clear liquid diet today follow primary care physician scheduled time time increase fiber diet strongly consider fiber supplementation

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , A 79-year-old Filipino woman referred for colonoscopy secondary to heme-positive stools. Procedure done to rule out generalized diverticular change, colitis, and neoplasia.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , The patient was explained the procedure in detail, possible complications including infection, perforation, adverse reaction of medication, and bleeding. Informed consent was signed by the patient.,With the patient in left decubitus position, had received a cumulative dose of 4 mg of Versed and 75 mg of Demerol, using Olympus video colonoscope under direct visualization was advanced to the cecum. Photodocumentation of appendiceal orifice and the ileocecal valve obtained. Cecum was slightly obscured with stool but the colon itself was adequately prepped. There was no evidence of overt colitis, telangiectasia, or overt neoplasia. There was moderately severe diverticular change, which was present throughout the colon and photodocumented. The rectal mucosa was normal and retroflexed with mild internal hemorrhoids. The patient tolerated the procedure well without any complications.,IMPRESSION:,1. Colonoscopy to the cecum with adequate preparation.,2. Long tortuous spastic colon.,3. Moderately severe diverticular changes present throughout.,4. Mild internal hemorrhoids.,RECOMMENDATIONS:,1. Clear liquid diet today.,2. Follow up with primary care physician as scheduled from time to time.,3. Increase fiber in diet, strongly consider fiber supplementation. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient was here for joint injection. She is a 14-year-old Hispanic female with history of pauciarticular arthritis in particular arthritis of her left knee, although she has complaints of arthralgias in multiple joints. What bother her the most is the joint swelling of her left knee that has been for several months. She has been taking Naprosyn on her last visit. She was feeling better but still has significant symptoms especially when she was active. After evaluation in the clinic, she decided to have a joint injection as it was discussed before. I discussed the side effects and the complications with the parents and the patient and the possibility of doing it in the clinic, but she decided that she did not want to do it in the clinic and she wanted to be sedated for this.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , So under aseptic technique and under general anesthesia, 20 mg of Aristospan were injected on the left knee. No fluid was obtained. Her swelling was about 1+. No complications. No bleeding was observed, and the patient tolerated the procedure without any complications or side effects. After that she went to the recovery room where is going to be discharged with her parents and see her back in the clinic for re-evaluation in a few weeks after the procedure. If the patient has any problems overnight, she is going to call us. If she had any fevers or strange swelling, she is to call us for advice. We will see her in the clinic as scheduled.

indications procedure patient joint injection yearold hispanic female history pauciarticular arthritis particular arthritis left knee although complaints arthralgias multiple joints bother joint swelling left knee several months taking naprosyn last visit feeling better still significant symptoms especially active evaluation clinic decided joint injection discussed discussed side effects complications parents patient possibility clinic decided want clinic wanted sedated thisdescription procedure aseptic technique general anesthesia mg aristospan injected left knee fluid obtained swelling complications bleeding observed patient tolerated procedure without complications side effects went recovery room going discharged parents see back clinic reevaluation weeks procedure patient problems overnight going call us fevers strange swelling call us advice see clinic scheduled

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: , The patient was here for joint injection. She is a 14-year-old Hispanic female with history of pauciarticular arthritis in particular arthritis of her left knee, although she has complaints of arthralgias in multiple joints. What bother her the most is the joint swelling of her left knee that has been for several months. She has been taking Naprosyn on her last visit. She was feeling better but still has significant symptoms especially when she was active. After evaluation in the clinic, she decided to have a joint injection as it was discussed before. I discussed the side effects and the complications with the parents and the patient and the possibility of doing it in the clinic, but she decided that she did not want to do it in the clinic and she wanted to be sedated for this.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , So under aseptic technique and under general anesthesia, 20 mg of Aristospan were injected on the left knee. No fluid was obtained. Her swelling was about 1+. No complications. No bleeding was observed, and the patient tolerated the procedure without any complications or side effects. After that she went to the recovery room where is going to be discharged with her parents and see her back in the clinic for re-evaluation in a few weeks after the procedure. If the patient has any problems overnight, she is going to call us. If she had any fevers or strange swelling, she is to call us for advice. We will see her in the clinic as scheduled. ### Response: Pain Management

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, Impending open heart surgery for closure of ventricular septal defect in a 4-month-old girl.,Procedures were done under general anesthesia. The patient was already in the operating room under general anesthesia. Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin and gentamicin was already given prior to beginning the procedures.,PROCEDURE #1:, Insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #1: , The probe was well lubricated and with digital manipulation, was passed into the esophagus without resistance. The probe was placed so that the larger diameter was in the anterior-posterior position during insertion. The probe was used by the pediatric cardiologist for preoperative and postoperative diagnostic echocardiography. At the end, it was removed without trauma and there was no blood tingeing. It is to be noted that approximately 30 minutes after removing the cannula, I inserted a 14-French suction tube to empty the stomach and there were a few mL of blood secretions that were suctioned. There was no overt bleeding.,PROCEDURE #2: , Attempted and unsuccessful insertion of arterial venous lines.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #2:, Both groins were prepped and draped. The patient was placed at 10 degrees head-up position. A Cook 4-French double-lumen 8-cm catheter kit was opened. Using the 21-gauge needle that comes with the kit, several attempts were made to insert central venous and then an arterial line in the left groin. There were several successful punctures of these vessels, but I was unable to advance Seldinger wire. After removal of the needles, the area was compressed digitally for approximately 5 minutes. There was a small hematoma that was not growing. Initially, the left leg was mildly mottled with prolonged capillary refill of approximately 3 seconds. Using 1% lidocaine, I infiltrated the vessels of the groin both medial and lateral to the vascular sheath. Further observation, the capillary refill and circulation of the left leg became more than adequate. The O2 saturation monitor that was on the left toe functioned well throughout the procedures, from the beginning to the end. At the end of the procedure, the circulation of the leg was intact.,

indications procedure impending open heart surgery closure ventricular septal defect monthold girlprocedures done general anesthesia patient already operating room general anesthesia antibiotic prophylaxis cefazolin gentamicin already given prior beginning proceduresprocedure insertion transesophageal echocardiography probedescription procedure probe well lubricated digital manipulation passed esophagus without resistance probe placed larger diameter anteriorposterior position insertion probe used pediatric cardiologist preoperative postoperative diagnostic echocardiography end removed without trauma blood tingeing noted approximately minutes removing cannula inserted french suction tube empty stomach ml blood secretions suctioned overt bleedingprocedure attempted unsuccessful insertion arterial venous linesdescription procedure groins prepped draped patient placed degrees headup position cook french doublelumen cm catheter kit opened using gauge needle comes kit several attempts made insert central venous arterial line left groin several successful punctures vessels unable advance seldinger wire removal needles area compressed digitally approximately minutes small hematoma growing initially left leg mildly mottled prolonged capillary refill approximately seconds using lidocaine infiltrated vessels groin medial lateral vascular sheath observation capillary refill circulation left leg became adequate saturation monitor left toe functioned well throughout procedures beginning end end procedure circulation leg intact

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, Impending open heart surgery for closure of ventricular septal defect in a 4-month-old girl.,Procedures were done under general anesthesia. The patient was already in the operating room under general anesthesia. Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin and gentamicin was already given prior to beginning the procedures.,PROCEDURE #1:, Insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #1: , The probe was well lubricated and with digital manipulation, was passed into the esophagus without resistance. The probe was placed so that the larger diameter was in the anterior-posterior position during insertion. The probe was used by the pediatric cardiologist for preoperative and postoperative diagnostic echocardiography. At the end, it was removed without trauma and there was no blood tingeing. It is to be noted that approximately 30 minutes after removing the cannula, I inserted a 14-French suction tube to empty the stomach and there were a few mL of blood secretions that were suctioned. There was no overt bleeding.,PROCEDURE #2: , Attempted and unsuccessful insertion of arterial venous lines.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #2:, Both groins were prepped and draped. The patient was placed at 10 degrees head-up position. A Cook 4-French double-lumen 8-cm catheter kit was opened. Using the 21-gauge needle that comes with the kit, several attempts were made to insert central venous and then an arterial line in the left groin. There were several successful punctures of these vessels, but I was unable to advance Seldinger wire. After removal of the needles, the area was compressed digitally for approximately 5 minutes. There was a small hematoma that was not growing. Initially, the left leg was mildly mottled with prolonged capillary refill of approximately 3 seconds. Using 1% lidocaine, I infiltrated the vessels of the groin both medial and lateral to the vascular sheath. Further observation, the capillary refill and circulation of the left leg became more than adequate. The O2 saturation monitor that was on the left toe functioned well throughout the procedures, from the beginning to the end. At the end of the procedure, the circulation of the leg was intact., ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, Persistent cough productive of sputum requiring repeated courses of oral antibiotics over the last six weeks in a patient who is a recipient of a bone marrow transplant with end-stage chemotherapy and radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis.,PREMEDICATION:,1. Demerol 50 mg.,2. Phenergan 25 mg.,3. Atropine 0.6 mg IM.,4. Nebulized 4% lidocaine followed by nasal insufflation of lidocaine through the right naris and topical 4% lidocaine gel through the right naris, 4 mg of Versed was given at the start of the procedure and another 1 mg shortly after traversing the cords.,PROCEDURE DETAILS:, With the patient breathing oxygen by nasal cannula, being monitored by noninvasive blood pressure cuff and continuous pulse oximetry, the Olympus bronchoscope was introduced through the right naris to the level of the cords. The cords move normally with phonation and ventilation. Two times 2 mL of 1% lidocaine were instilled on the cords and the cords were traversed. Further 2 mL of 1% lidocaine was instilled in the trachea just distal to the cords, at mid trachea above the carina, and on the right, and on the left mainstem bronchus. Scope was then introduced on to the left where immediately some hyperemia of the mucosa was noted. Upper lobe and lingula were unremarkable. There appeared to be some narrowing or tenting of the left lower lobe bronchus such that after inspection of the superior segment, one almost had to pop the bronchoscope around to go down the left mainstem. This had been a change from the prior bronchoscopy of unclear significance. Distal to this, there was no hyperemia or inspissated mucus or mucoid secretions or signs of infection. The scope was wedged in the left lower lobe posterior basal segment and a BAL was done with good returns, which were faintly hemorrhagic. The scope was then removed, re-introduced up to the right upper lobe, middle lobe, superior segment, right lower, anterior lateral, and posterior basal subsegments were all evaluated and unremarkable. The scope was withdrawn. The patient's saturation remained 93%-95% throughout the procedure. Blood pressure was 103/62. Heart rate at the end of the procedure was about 100. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Samples were sent as follows. Washings for AFB, Gram-stain Nocardia, Aspergillus, and routine culture. Lavage for AFB, Gram-stain Nocardia, Aspergillus, cell count with differential, cytology, viral mycoplasma, and Chlamydia culture, GMS staining, RSV by antigen, and Legionella and Chlamydia culture.

indications procedure persistent cough productive sputum requiring repeated courses oral antibiotics last six weeks patient recipient bone marrow transplant endstage chemotherapy radiationinduced pulmonary fibrosispremedication demerol mg phenergan mg atropine mg im nebulized lidocaine followed nasal insufflation lidocaine right naris topical lidocaine gel right naris mg versed given start procedure another mg shortly traversing cordsprocedure details patient breathing oxygen nasal cannula monitored noninvasive blood pressure cuff continuous pulse oximetry olympus bronchoscope introduced right naris level cords cords move normally phonation ventilation two times ml lidocaine instilled cords cords traversed ml lidocaine instilled trachea distal cords mid trachea carina right left mainstem bronchus scope introduced left immediately hyperemia mucosa noted upper lobe lingula unremarkable appeared narrowing tenting left lower lobe bronchus inspection superior segment one almost pop bronchoscope around go left mainstem change prior bronchoscopy unclear significance distal hyperemia inspissated mucus mucoid secretions signs infection scope wedged left lower lobe posterior basal segment bal done good returns faintly hemorrhagic scope removed reintroduced right upper lobe middle lobe superior segment right lower anterior lateral posterior basal subsegments evaluated unremarkable scope withdrawn patients saturation remained throughout procedure blood pressure heart rate end procedure patient tolerated procedure well samples sent follows washings afb gramstain nocardia aspergillus routine culture lavage afb gramstain nocardia aspergillus cell count differential cytology viral mycoplasma chlamydia culture gms staining rsv antigen legionella chlamydia culture

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, Persistent cough productive of sputum requiring repeated courses of oral antibiotics over the last six weeks in a patient who is a recipient of a bone marrow transplant with end-stage chemotherapy and radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis.,PREMEDICATION:,1. Demerol 50 mg.,2. Phenergan 25 mg.,3. Atropine 0.6 mg IM.,4. Nebulized 4% lidocaine followed by nasal insufflation of lidocaine through the right naris and topical 4% lidocaine gel through the right naris, 4 mg of Versed was given at the start of the procedure and another 1 mg shortly after traversing the cords.,PROCEDURE DETAILS:, With the patient breathing oxygen by nasal cannula, being monitored by noninvasive blood pressure cuff and continuous pulse oximetry, the Olympus bronchoscope was introduced through the right naris to the level of the cords. The cords move normally with phonation and ventilation. Two times 2 mL of 1% lidocaine were instilled on the cords and the cords were traversed. Further 2 mL of 1% lidocaine was instilled in the trachea just distal to the cords, at mid trachea above the carina, and on the right, and on the left mainstem bronchus. Scope was then introduced on to the left where immediately some hyperemia of the mucosa was noted. Upper lobe and lingula were unremarkable. There appeared to be some narrowing or tenting of the left lower lobe bronchus such that after inspection of the superior segment, one almost had to pop the bronchoscope around to go down the left mainstem. This had been a change from the prior bronchoscopy of unclear significance. Distal to this, there was no hyperemia or inspissated mucus or mucoid secretions or signs of infection. The scope was wedged in the left lower lobe posterior basal segment and a BAL was done with good returns, which were faintly hemorrhagic. The scope was then removed, re-introduced up to the right upper lobe, middle lobe, superior segment, right lower, anterior lateral, and posterior basal subsegments were all evaluated and unremarkable. The scope was withdrawn. The patient's saturation remained 93%-95% throughout the procedure. Blood pressure was 103/62. Heart rate at the end of the procedure was about 100. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Samples were sent as follows. Washings for AFB, Gram-stain Nocardia, Aspergillus, and routine culture. Lavage for AFB, Gram-stain Nocardia, Aspergillus, cell count with differential, cytology, viral mycoplasma, and Chlamydia culture, GMS staining, RSV by antigen, and Legionella and Chlamydia culture. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, A 51-year-old, obese, white female with positive family history of coronary disease and history of chest radiation for Hodgkin disease 20 years ago with no other identifiable risk factors who presents with an acute myocardial infarction with elevated enzymes. The chest pain occurred early Tuesday morning. She was treated with Plavix, Lovenox, etc., and transferred for coronary angiography and possible PCI. The plan was discussed with the patient and all questions answered.,PROCEDURE NOTE:, Following sterile prep and drape, the right groin and instillation of 1% Xylocaine anesthesia, the right femoral artery was percutaneously entered with a single wall puncture. A 6-French sheath inserted. Selective left and right coronary injections performed using Judkins coronary catheters with a 6-French pigtail catheter used to obtain left ventricle pressures, and a left ventriculography. The left pullback pressure. The catheters withdrawn. Sheath injection. Hemostasis obtained with a 6-French Angio-Seal device. She tolerated the procedure well.,Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure equals 25 mmHg post A wave. No aortic valve or systolic gradient on pullback.,ANGIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS:,I. Left coronary artery: The left main coronary artery is,normal. The left anterior descending extends to the apex and has only minor luminal irregularities within the midportion of the vessel. Normal diagonal branches. Normal septal perforator branches. The left circumflex is a nondominant vessel with only minor irregularities with normal obtuse marginal branches.,II. Right coronary artery: The proximal right coronary artery has a focal calcification. There is minor plaque with luminal irregularity in the proximal and midportion of the vessel with no narrowing greater than 10 to 20% at most. The right coronary artery is a dominant system which gives off normal posterior,descending and posterior lateral branches. TIMI 3 flow is present.,III. Left ventriculogram: The left ventricle is slightly enlarged with normal contraction of the base, but, with wall motion abnormality involving the anteroapical and inferoapical left ventricle with hypokinesis within the apical portion. Ejection fraction estimated 40%, 1+ mitral regurgitation (echocardiogram ordered).,DISCUSSION:, Recent inferoapical mild myocardial infarction by left ventriculography and cardiac enzymes with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure post A wave, but, only minor residual coronary artery plaque with calcification proximal right coronary artery.,PLAN:, Medical treatment is contemplated, including ACE inhibitor, a beta blocker, aspirin, Plavix, nitrates. An echocardiogram is ordered to exclude apical left ventricular thrombus and to further assess ejection fraction.

indications procedure yearold obese white female positive family history coronary disease history chest radiation hodgkin disease years ago identifiable risk factors presents acute myocardial infarction elevated enzymes chest pain occurred early tuesday morning treated plavix lovenox etc transferred coronary angiography possible pci plan discussed patient questions answeredprocedure note following sterile prep drape right groin instillation xylocaine anesthesia right femoral artery percutaneously entered single wall puncture french sheath inserted selective left right coronary injections performed using judkins coronary catheters french pigtail catheter used obtain left ventricle pressures left ventriculography left pullback pressure catheters withdrawn sheath injection hemostasis obtained french angioseal device tolerated procedure wellleft ventricular enddiastolic pressure equals mmhg post wave aortic valve systolic gradient pullbackangiographic findingsi left coronary artery left main coronary artery isnormal left anterior descending extends apex minor luminal irregularities within midportion vessel normal diagonal branches normal septal perforator branches left circumflex nondominant vessel minor irregularities normal obtuse marginal branchesii right coronary artery proximal right coronary artery focal calcification minor plaque luminal irregularity proximal midportion vessel narrowing greater right coronary artery dominant system gives normal posteriordescending posterior lateral branches timi flow presentiii left ventriculogram left ventricle slightly enlarged normal contraction base wall motion abnormality involving anteroapical inferoapical left ventricle hypokinesis within apical portion ejection fraction estimated mitral regurgitation echocardiogram ordereddiscussion recent inferoapical mild myocardial infarction left ventriculography cardiac enzymes elevated left ventricular enddiastolic pressure post wave minor residual coronary artery plaque calcification proximal right coronary arteryplan medical treatment contemplated including ace inhibitor beta blocker aspirin plavix nitrates echocardiogram ordered exclude apical left ventricular thrombus assess ejection fraction

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, A 51-year-old, obese, white female with positive family history of coronary disease and history of chest radiation for Hodgkin disease 20 years ago with no other identifiable risk factors who presents with an acute myocardial infarction with elevated enzymes. The chest pain occurred early Tuesday morning. She was treated with Plavix, Lovenox, etc., and transferred for coronary angiography and possible PCI. The plan was discussed with the patient and all questions answered.,PROCEDURE NOTE:, Following sterile prep and drape, the right groin and instillation of 1% Xylocaine anesthesia, the right femoral artery was percutaneously entered with a single wall puncture. A 6-French sheath inserted. Selective left and right coronary injections performed using Judkins coronary catheters with a 6-French pigtail catheter used to obtain left ventricle pressures, and a left ventriculography. The left pullback pressure. The catheters withdrawn. Sheath injection. Hemostasis obtained with a 6-French Angio-Seal device. She tolerated the procedure well.,Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure equals 25 mmHg post A wave. No aortic valve or systolic gradient on pullback.,ANGIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS:,I. Left coronary artery: The left main coronary artery is,normal. The left anterior descending extends to the apex and has only minor luminal irregularities within the midportion of the vessel. Normal diagonal branches. Normal septal perforator branches. The left circumflex is a nondominant vessel with only minor irregularities with normal obtuse marginal branches.,II. Right coronary artery: The proximal right coronary artery has a focal calcification. There is minor plaque with luminal irregularity in the proximal and midportion of the vessel with no narrowing greater than 10 to 20% at most. The right coronary artery is a dominant system which gives off normal posterior,descending and posterior lateral branches. TIMI 3 flow is present.,III. Left ventriculogram: The left ventricle is slightly enlarged with normal contraction of the base, but, with wall motion abnormality involving the anteroapical and inferoapical left ventricle with hypokinesis within the apical portion. Ejection fraction estimated 40%, 1+ mitral regurgitation (echocardiogram ordered).,DISCUSSION:, Recent inferoapical mild myocardial infarction by left ventriculography and cardiac enzymes with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure post A wave, but, only minor residual coronary artery plaque with calcification proximal right coronary artery.,PLAN:, Medical treatment is contemplated, including ACE inhibitor, a beta blocker, aspirin, Plavix, nitrates. An echocardiogram is ordered to exclude apical left ventricular thrombus and to further assess ejection fraction. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, The patient has presented with atypical type right arm discomfort and neck discomfort. She had noninvasive vascular imaging demonstrating suspected right subclavian stenosis. Of note, there was bidirectional flow in the right vertebral artery, as well as 250 cm per second velocities in the right subclavian. Duplex ultrasound showed at least a 50% stenosis.,APPROACH:, Right common femoral artery.,ANESTHESIA:, IV sedation with cardiac catheterization protocol. Local infiltration with 1% Xylocaine.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 10 ml.,ESTIMATED CONTRAST:, Less than 250 ml.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Right brachiocephalic angiography, right subclavian angiography, selective catheterization of the right subclavian, selective aortic arch angiogram, right iliofemoral angiogram, 6 French Angio-Seal placement.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought to the cardiac catheterization lab in the usual fasting state. She was laid supine on the cardiac catheterization table, and the right groin was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. 1% Xylocaine was infiltrated into the right femoral vessels. Next, a #6 French sheath was introduced into the right femoral artery via the modified Seldinger technique.,AORTIC ARCH ANGIOGRAM:, Next, a pigtail catheter was advanced to the aortic arch. Aortic arch angiogram was then performed with injection of 45 ml of contrast, rate of 20 ml per second, maximum pressure 750 PSI in the 4 degree LAO view.,SELECTIVE SUBCLAVIAN ANGIOGRAPHY:, Next, the right subclavian was selectively cannulated. It was injected in the standard AP, as well as the RAO view. Next pull back pressures were measured across the right subclavian stenosis. No significant gradient was measured.,ANGIOGRAPHIC DETAILS:, The right brachiocephalic artery was patent. The proximal portion of the right carotid was patent. The proximal portion of the right subclavian prior to the origin of the vertebral and the internal mammary showed 50% stenosis.,IMPRESSION:,1. Moderate grade stenosis in the right subclavian artery.,2. Patent proximal edge of the right carotid.

indications procedure patient presented atypical type right arm discomfort neck discomfort noninvasive vascular imaging demonstrating suspected right subclavian stenosis note bidirectional flow right vertebral artery well cm per second velocities right subclavian duplex ultrasound showed least stenosisapproach right common femoral arteryanesthesia iv sedation cardiac catheterization protocol local infiltration xylocainecomplications noneestimated blood loss less mlestimated contrast less mlprocedure performed right brachiocephalic angiography right subclavian angiography selective catheterization right subclavian selective aortic arch angiogram right iliofemoral angiogram french angioseal placementdescription procedure patient brought cardiac catheterization lab usual fasting state laid supine cardiac catheterization table right groin prepped draped usual sterile fashion xylocaine infiltrated right femoral vessels next french sheath introduced right femoral artery via modified seldinger techniqueaortic arch angiogram next pigtail catheter advanced aortic arch aortic arch angiogram performed injection ml contrast rate ml per second maximum pressure psi degree lao viewselective subclavian angiography next right subclavian selectively cannulated injected standard ap well rao view next pull back pressures measured across right subclavian stenosis significant gradient measuredangiographic details right brachiocephalic artery patent proximal portion right carotid patent proximal portion right subclavian prior origin vertebral internal mammary showed stenosisimpression moderate grade stenosis right subclavian artery patent proximal edge right carotid

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, The patient has presented with atypical type right arm discomfort and neck discomfort. She had noninvasive vascular imaging demonstrating suspected right subclavian stenosis. Of note, there was bidirectional flow in the right vertebral artery, as well as 250 cm per second velocities in the right subclavian. Duplex ultrasound showed at least a 50% stenosis.,APPROACH:, Right common femoral artery.,ANESTHESIA:, IV sedation with cardiac catheterization protocol. Local infiltration with 1% Xylocaine.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 10 ml.,ESTIMATED CONTRAST:, Less than 250 ml.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED:, Right brachiocephalic angiography, right subclavian angiography, selective catheterization of the right subclavian, selective aortic arch angiogram, right iliofemoral angiogram, 6 French Angio-Seal placement.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, The patient was brought to the cardiac catheterization lab in the usual fasting state. She was laid supine on the cardiac catheterization table, and the right groin was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. 1% Xylocaine was infiltrated into the right femoral vessels. Next, a #6 French sheath was introduced into the right femoral artery via the modified Seldinger technique.,AORTIC ARCH ANGIOGRAM:, Next, a pigtail catheter was advanced to the aortic arch. Aortic arch angiogram was then performed with injection of 45 ml of contrast, rate of 20 ml per second, maximum pressure 750 PSI in the 4 degree LAO view.,SELECTIVE SUBCLAVIAN ANGIOGRAPHY:, Next, the right subclavian was selectively cannulated. It was injected in the standard AP, as well as the RAO view. Next pull back pressures were measured across the right subclavian stenosis. No significant gradient was measured.,ANGIOGRAPHIC DETAILS:, The right brachiocephalic artery was patent. The proximal portion of the right carotid was patent. The proximal portion of the right subclavian prior to the origin of the vertebral and the internal mammary showed 50% stenosis.,IMPRESSION:,1. Moderate grade stenosis in the right subclavian artery.,2. Patent proximal edge of the right carotid. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, The patient has presented with crushing-type substernal chest pain, even in the face of a normal nuclear medicine study. She is here for catheterization.,APPROACH:, Right common femoral artery.,ANESTHESIA:, IV sedation per cardiac catheterization protocol. Local sedation with 1% Xylocaine.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 10 mL.,ESTIMATED CONTRAST:, Less than 150 mL.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED:, Left heart catheterization, left ventriculogram, selective coronary arteriography, aortic arch angiogram, right iliofemoral angiogram, #6 French Angio-Seal placement.,OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE:, The patient was brought to the cardiac catheterization lab in the usual fasting state. She was placed supine on the cardiac catheterization table and the right groin was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. One percent Xylocaine was infiltrated into the right femoral vessels. Next, a #6 French sheath was then placed in the right common femoral artery by the modified Seldinger technique.,SELECTIVE CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY:, Next, right and left Judkins diagnostic catheters were advanced through their respective ostia and injected in multiple views.,LEFT VENTRICULOGRAM:, Next, a pigtail catheter was advanced across the aortic valve and left ventricular pressure recorded. Next, an LV-gram was then performed with a hand injection of 50 mL of contrast. Next, pull-back pressure was measured across the aortic valve.,AORTA ARCH ANGIOGRAM:, Next, aortic arch angiogram was then performed with injection of 50 mL of contrast at a rate of 20 mL/second to maximum pressure of 750 PSI performed in the 40-degree LAO view.,Next, right iliofemoral angiogram was performed in the 20-degree RAO view. Next Angio-Seal was applied successfully.,The patient left the cath lab without problems or issues.,DIAGNOSES:, Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 18 mmHg. There was no gradient across the aortic valve. The central aortic pressure was 160 mmHg.,LEFT VENTRICULOGRAM:, The left ventriculogram demonstrated normal LV systolic function with estimated ejection fraction greater than 50%.,AORTIC ARCH ANGIOGRAM: ,The aortic arch angiogram demonstrated normal aortic arch. No aortic regurgitation was seen.,SELECTIVE CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY:, The right coronary artery is large and dominant.,The left main is patent.,The left anterior descending is patent.,The left circumflex is patent.,IMPRESSION:, This study demonstrates normal coronary arteries in the presence of normal left ventricular systolic function. In addition, the aortic root is normal.

indications procedure patient presented crushingtype substernal chest pain even face normal nuclear medicine study catheterizationapproach right common femoral arteryanesthesia iv sedation per cardiac catheterization protocol local sedation xylocainecomplications noneestimated blood loss less mlestimated contrast less mlprocedures performed left heart catheterization left ventriculogram selective coronary arteriography aortic arch angiogram right iliofemoral angiogram french angioseal placementoperative technique patient brought cardiac catheterization lab usual fasting state placed supine cardiac catheterization table right groin prepped draped usual sterile fashion one percent xylocaine infiltrated right femoral vessels next french sheath placed right common femoral artery modified seldinger techniqueselective coronary arteriography next right left judkins diagnostic catheters advanced respective ostia injected multiple viewsleft ventriculogram next pigtail catheter advanced across aortic valve left ventricular pressure recorded next lvgram performed hand injection ml contrast next pullback pressure measured across aortic valveaorta arch angiogram next aortic arch angiogram performed injection ml contrast rate mlsecond maximum pressure psi performed degree lao viewnext right iliofemoral angiogram performed degree rao view next angioseal applied successfullythe patient left cath lab without problems issuesdiagnoses left ventricular enddiastolic pressure mmhg gradient across aortic valve central aortic pressure mmhgleft ventriculogram left ventriculogram demonstrated normal lv systolic function estimated ejection fraction greater aortic arch angiogram aortic arch angiogram demonstrated normal aortic arch aortic regurgitation seenselective coronary arteriography right coronary artery large dominantthe left main patentthe left anterior descending patentthe left circumflex patentimpression study demonstrates normal coronary arteries presence normal left ventricular systolic function addition aortic root normal

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, The patient has presented with crushing-type substernal chest pain, even in the face of a normal nuclear medicine study. She is here for catheterization.,APPROACH:, Right common femoral artery.,ANESTHESIA:, IV sedation per cardiac catheterization protocol. Local sedation with 1% Xylocaine.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS:, Less than 10 mL.,ESTIMATED CONTRAST:, Less than 150 mL.,PROCEDURES PERFORMED:, Left heart catheterization, left ventriculogram, selective coronary arteriography, aortic arch angiogram, right iliofemoral angiogram, #6 French Angio-Seal placement.,OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE:, The patient was brought to the cardiac catheterization lab in the usual fasting state. She was placed supine on the cardiac catheterization table and the right groin was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. One percent Xylocaine was infiltrated into the right femoral vessels. Next, a #6 French sheath was then placed in the right common femoral artery by the modified Seldinger technique.,SELECTIVE CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY:, Next, right and left Judkins diagnostic catheters were advanced through their respective ostia and injected in multiple views.,LEFT VENTRICULOGRAM:, Next, a pigtail catheter was advanced across the aortic valve and left ventricular pressure recorded. Next, an LV-gram was then performed with a hand injection of 50 mL of contrast. Next, pull-back pressure was measured across the aortic valve.,AORTA ARCH ANGIOGRAM:, Next, aortic arch angiogram was then performed with injection of 50 mL of contrast at a rate of 20 mL/second to maximum pressure of 750 PSI performed in the 40-degree LAO view.,Next, right iliofemoral angiogram was performed in the 20-degree RAO view. Next Angio-Seal was applied successfully.,The patient left the cath lab without problems or issues.,DIAGNOSES:, Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 18 mmHg. There was no gradient across the aortic valve. The central aortic pressure was 160 mmHg.,LEFT VENTRICULOGRAM:, The left ventriculogram demonstrated normal LV systolic function with estimated ejection fraction greater than 50%.,AORTIC ARCH ANGIOGRAM: ,The aortic arch angiogram demonstrated normal aortic arch. No aortic regurgitation was seen.,SELECTIVE CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY:, The right coronary artery is large and dominant.,The left main is patent.,The left anterior descending is patent.,The left circumflex is patent.,IMPRESSION:, This study demonstrates normal coronary arteries in the presence of normal left ventricular systolic function. In addition, the aortic root is normal. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, This is a 61-year-old, white male with onset of chest pain at 04: 30 this morning, with history of on and off chest discomfort over the past several days. CPK is already over 1000. There is ST elevation in leads II and aVF, as well as a Q wave. The chest pain is now gone, mild residual shortness of breath, no orthopnea. Cardiac monitor shows resolution of ST elevation lead III.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, Following sterile prep and drape of the right groin, installation of 1% Xylocaine anesthesia, the right common femoral artery was percutaneously entered and 6-French sheath inserted. ACT approximately 165 seconds on heparin. Borderline hypotension 250 mL fluid bolus given and nitroglycerin patch removed. Selective left and right coronary injections performed using Judkins coronary catheters with a 6-French pigtail catheter used to obtain left ventricular pressures and left ventriculography. Left pullback pressure. Sheath injection. Hemostasis obtained with a 6-French Angio-Seal device. He tolerated the procedure well and was transported to the Cardiac Step-Down Unit in stable condition.,HEMODYNAMIC DATA:, Left ventricular end diastolic pressure elevated post A-wave at 25 mm of Mercury with no aortic valve systolic gradient on pullback.,ANGIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS:,I. Left coronary artery: The left main coronary artery is unremarkable. The left anterior descending has 30 to 40% narrowing with tortuosity in its proximal portion, patent first septal perforator branch. The first diagonal branch is a 2 mm vessel with a 90% ostial stenosis. The second diagonal branch is unremarkable, as are the tiny distal diagonal branches. The intermediate branch is a small, normal vessel. The ostial non-dominant circumflex has some contrast thinning, but no stenosis, normal obtuse marginal branch, and small AV sulcus circumflex branch.,II. Right coronary artery: The right coronary artery is a large, dominant vessel which gives off large posterior descending and posterolateral left ventricular branches. There are luminal irregularities, less than 25%, within the proximal to mid vessel. Some contrast thinning is present in the distal RCA just before the bifurcation into posterior descending and posterolateral branches. A 25%, smooth narrowing at the origin of the posterior descending branch. Posterolateral branch is unremarkable and quite large, with secondary and tertiary branches.,III. Left ventriculogram: The left ventricle is normal in size. Ejection fraction estimated at 40 to 45%. No mitral regurgitation. Severe hypokinesis to akinesis is present in the posterobasal and posteromedial segments with normal anteroapical wall motion.,DISCUSSION:, Recent inferior myocardial infarction with only minor contrast thinning distal RCA remaining on coronary angiography with resolution of chest pain and ST segment elevation. Left coronary system has one hemodynamically significant stenosis (a 90% ostial stenosis at the first diagonal branch, which is a 2 mm vessel). Left ventricular function is reduced with ejection fraction 40 to 45% with inferior wall motion abnormality.,PLAN:, Medical treatment, including Plavix and nitrates, in addition to beta blocker, aspirin, and aggressive lipid reduction.

indications procedure yearold white male onset chest pain morning history chest discomfort past several days cpk already st elevation leads ii avf well q wave chest pain gone mild residual shortness breath orthopnea cardiac monitor shows resolution st elevation lead iiidescription procedure following sterile prep drape right groin installation xylocaine anesthesia right common femoral artery percutaneously entered french sheath inserted act approximately seconds heparin borderline hypotension ml fluid bolus given nitroglycerin patch removed selective left right coronary injections performed using judkins coronary catheters french pigtail catheter used obtain left ventricular pressures left ventriculography left pullback pressure sheath injection hemostasis obtained french angioseal device tolerated procedure well transported cardiac stepdown unit stable conditionhemodynamic data left ventricular end diastolic pressure elevated post awave mm mercury aortic valve systolic gradient pullbackangiographic findingsi left coronary artery left main coronary artery unremarkable left anterior descending narrowing tortuosity proximal portion patent first septal perforator branch first diagonal branch mm vessel ostial stenosis second diagonal branch unremarkable tiny distal diagonal branches intermediate branch small normal vessel ostial nondominant circumflex contrast thinning stenosis normal obtuse marginal branch small av sulcus circumflex branchii right coronary artery right coronary artery large dominant vessel gives large posterior descending posterolateral left ventricular branches luminal irregularities less within proximal mid vessel contrast thinning present distal rca bifurcation posterior descending posterolateral branches smooth narrowing origin posterior descending branch posterolateral branch unremarkable quite large secondary tertiary branchesiii left ventriculogram left ventricle normal size ejection fraction estimated mitral regurgitation severe hypokinesis akinesis present posterobasal posteromedial segments normal anteroapical wall motiondiscussion recent inferior myocardial infarction minor contrast thinning distal rca remaining coronary angiography resolution chest pain st segment elevation left coronary system one hemodynamically significant stenosis ostial stenosis first diagonal branch mm vessel left ventricular function reduced ejection fraction inferior wall motion abnormalityplan medical treatment including plavix nitrates addition beta blocker aspirin aggressive lipid reduction

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE:, This is a 61-year-old, white male with onset of chest pain at 04: 30 this morning, with history of on and off chest discomfort over the past several days. CPK is already over 1000. There is ST elevation in leads II and aVF, as well as a Q wave. The chest pain is now gone, mild residual shortness of breath, no orthopnea. Cardiac monitor shows resolution of ST elevation lead III.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, Following sterile prep and drape of the right groin, installation of 1% Xylocaine anesthesia, the right common femoral artery was percutaneously entered and 6-French sheath inserted. ACT approximately 165 seconds on heparin. Borderline hypotension 250 mL fluid bolus given and nitroglycerin patch removed. Selective left and right coronary injections performed using Judkins coronary catheters with a 6-French pigtail catheter used to obtain left ventricular pressures and left ventriculography. Left pullback pressure. Sheath injection. Hemostasis obtained with a 6-French Angio-Seal device. He tolerated the procedure well and was transported to the Cardiac Step-Down Unit in stable condition.,HEMODYNAMIC DATA:, Left ventricular end diastolic pressure elevated post A-wave at 25 mm of Mercury with no aortic valve systolic gradient on pullback.,ANGIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS:,I. Left coronary artery: The left main coronary artery is unremarkable. The left anterior descending has 30 to 40% narrowing with tortuosity in its proximal portion, patent first septal perforator branch. The first diagonal branch is a 2 mm vessel with a 90% ostial stenosis. The second diagonal branch is unremarkable, as are the tiny distal diagonal branches. The intermediate branch is a small, normal vessel. The ostial non-dominant circumflex has some contrast thinning, but no stenosis, normal obtuse marginal branch, and small AV sulcus circumflex branch.,II. Right coronary artery: The right coronary artery is a large, dominant vessel which gives off large posterior descending and posterolateral left ventricular branches. There are luminal irregularities, less than 25%, within the proximal to mid vessel. Some contrast thinning is present in the distal RCA just before the bifurcation into posterior descending and posterolateral branches. A 25%, smooth narrowing at the origin of the posterior descending branch. Posterolateral branch is unremarkable and quite large, with secondary and tertiary branches.,III. Left ventriculogram: The left ventricle is normal in size. Ejection fraction estimated at 40 to 45%. No mitral regurgitation. Severe hypokinesis to akinesis is present in the posterobasal and posteromedial segments with normal anteroapical wall motion.,DISCUSSION:, Recent inferior myocardial infarction with only minor contrast thinning distal RCA remaining on coronary angiography with resolution of chest pain and ST segment elevation. Left coronary system has one hemodynamically significant stenosis (a 90% ostial stenosis at the first diagonal branch, which is a 2 mm vessel). Left ventricular function is reduced with ejection fraction 40 to 45% with inferior wall motion abnormality.,PLAN:, Medical treatment, including Plavix and nitrates, in addition to beta blocker, aspirin, and aggressive lipid reduction. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURES: , Impending open-heart surgery for atrial septectomy and bilateral bidirectional Glenn procedure.,The patient was already under general anesthesia in the operating room. Antibiotic prophylaxis with cephazolin and gentamicin were already given. A strict aseptic technique was used including use of gowns, mask, and gloves, etc. The skin was cleansed with alcohol and then prepped with ChloraPrep solution.,PROCEDURE #1:, Insertion of central venous line.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #1: , Attention was directed to the right groin. A Cook 4-French double-lumen 12-cm long central venous heparin-coated catheter kit was opened. Using the 21-gauge needle that comes with this kit, the needle was inserted approximately 2 cm below the right inguinal ligament just medial to the pulsations of the femoral artery. There was good venous blood return on the first try. Using the Seldinger technique, the soft J-end of the wire was inserted through the needle without resistance approximately 15 cm. It was then exchanged for a 5-French dilator followed by the 4-French double-lumen catheter and the wire was removed intact. There was good blood return from both lumens, which were flushed with heparinized saline. The catheter was sutured to the skin at three points with #4-0 silk for stabilization.,PROCEDURE #2:, Insertion of arterial line.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #2:, Attention was directed to the left wrist, which was placed on wrist rest. The Allen test was normal. A Cook 2.5-French 5 cm long arterial catheter kit was opened. A 22-gauge IV cannula was used to enter the artery, which was done on the first try with good pulsatile blood return. Using the Seldinger technique, the catheter was exchanged for a 2.5-French catheter and the wire was removed intact. There was pulsatile blood return and the catheter was flushed with heparinized saline solution. It was sutured to the skin with #4-0 silk at three points for stabilization.,Both catheters functioned well throughout the procedure. The distal circulation of the leg and the hand was intact immediately after insertion, approximately 20 minutes later, and at the end of the procedure. There were no complications.,PROCEDURE #3: , Insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #3: , The probe was inserted under direct vision because initially there was some resistance to insertion. Under direct vision, using the #2 Miller blade, the upper esophageal opening was visualized and the probe was passed easily without resistance. There was good visualization of the heart. The probe was used by the pediatric cardiologist for preoperative and postoperative diagnostic echocardiography. The probe was removed at the end. There was no trauma and there was no blood tingeing.,

indications procedures impending openheart surgery atrial septectomy bilateral bidirectional glenn procedurethe patient already general anesthesia operating room antibiotic prophylaxis cephazolin gentamicin already given strict aseptic technique used including use gowns mask gloves etc skin cleansed alcohol prepped chloraprep solutionprocedure insertion central venous linedescription procedure attention directed right groin cook french doublelumen cm long central venous heparincoated catheter kit opened using gauge needle comes kit needle inserted approximately cm right inguinal ligament medial pulsations femoral artery good venous blood return first try using seldinger technique soft jend wire inserted needle without resistance approximately cm exchanged french dilator followed french doublelumen catheter wire removed intact good blood return lumens flushed heparinized saline catheter sutured skin three points silk stabilizationprocedure insertion arterial linedescription procedure attention directed left wrist placed wrist rest allen test normal cook french cm long arterial catheter kit opened gauge iv cannula used enter artery done first try good pulsatile blood return using seldinger technique catheter exchanged french catheter wire removed intact pulsatile blood return catheter flushed heparinized saline solution sutured skin silk three points stabilizationboth catheters functioned well throughout procedure distal circulation leg hand intact immediately insertion approximately minutes later end procedure complicationsprocedure insertion transesophageal echocardiography probedescription procedure probe inserted direct vision initially resistance insertion direct vision using miller blade upper esophageal opening visualized probe passed easily without resistance good visualization heart probe used pediatric cardiologist preoperative postoperative diagnostic echocardiography probe removed end trauma blood tingeing

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURES: , Impending open-heart surgery for atrial septectomy and bilateral bidirectional Glenn procedure.,The patient was already under general anesthesia in the operating room. Antibiotic prophylaxis with cephazolin and gentamicin were already given. A strict aseptic technique was used including use of gowns, mask, and gloves, etc. The skin was cleansed with alcohol and then prepped with ChloraPrep solution.,PROCEDURE #1:, Insertion of central venous line.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #1: , Attention was directed to the right groin. A Cook 4-French double-lumen 12-cm long central venous heparin-coated catheter kit was opened. Using the 21-gauge needle that comes with this kit, the needle was inserted approximately 2 cm below the right inguinal ligament just medial to the pulsations of the femoral artery. There was good venous blood return on the first try. Using the Seldinger technique, the soft J-end of the wire was inserted through the needle without resistance approximately 15 cm. It was then exchanged for a 5-French dilator followed by the 4-French double-lumen catheter and the wire was removed intact. There was good blood return from both lumens, which were flushed with heparinized saline. The catheter was sutured to the skin at three points with #4-0 silk for stabilization.,PROCEDURE #2:, Insertion of arterial line.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #2:, Attention was directed to the left wrist, which was placed on wrist rest. The Allen test was normal. A Cook 2.5-French 5 cm long arterial catheter kit was opened. A 22-gauge IV cannula was used to enter the artery, which was done on the first try with good pulsatile blood return. Using the Seldinger technique, the catheter was exchanged for a 2.5-French catheter and the wire was removed intact. There was pulsatile blood return and the catheter was flushed with heparinized saline solution. It was sutured to the skin with #4-0 silk at three points for stabilization.,Both catheters functioned well throughout the procedure. The distal circulation of the leg and the hand was intact immediately after insertion, approximately 20 minutes later, and at the end of the procedure. There were no complications.,PROCEDURE #3: , Insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE #3: , The probe was inserted under direct vision because initially there was some resistance to insertion. Under direct vision, using the #2 Miller blade, the upper esophageal opening was visualized and the probe was passed easily without resistance. There was good visualization of the heart. The probe was used by the pediatric cardiologist for preoperative and postoperative diagnostic echocardiography. The probe was removed at the end. There was no trauma and there was no blood tingeing., ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

INDICATIONS: ,Chest pain, hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus.,PROCEDURE DONE:, Dobutamine Myoview stress test.,STRESS ECG RESULTS:, The patient was stressed by dobutamine infusion at a rate of 10 mcg/kg/minute for three minutes, 20 mcg/kg/minute for three minutes, and 30 mcg/kg/minute for three additional minutes. Atropine 0.25 mg was given intravenously eight minutes into the dobutamine infusion. The resting electrocardiogram reveals a regular sinus rhythm with heart rate of 86 beats per minute, QS pattern in leads V1 and V2, and diffuse nonspecific T wave abnormality. The heart rate increased from 86 beats per minute to 155 beats per minute, which is about 90% of the maximum predicted target heart rate. The blood pressure increased from 130/80 to 160/70. A maximum of 1 mm J-junctional depression was seen with fast up sloping ST segments during dobutamine infusion. No ischemic ST segment changes were seen during dobutamine infusion or during the recovery process.,MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING:, Resting myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging was carried out with 10.9 mCi of Tc-99m Myoview. Dobutamine infusion myocardial perfusion imaging and gated scan were carried out with 29.2 mCi of Tc-99m Myoview. The lung heart ratio is 0.36. Myocardial perfusion images were normal both at rest and with stress. Gated myocardial scan revealed normal regional wall motion and ejection fraction of 67%.,CONCLUSIONS:,1. Stress test is negative for dobutamine-induced myocardial ischemia.,2. Normal left ventricular size, regional wall motion, and ejection fraction.

indications chest pain hypertension type ii diabetes mellitusprocedure done dobutamine myoview stress teststress ecg results patient stressed dobutamine infusion rate mcgkgminute three minutes mcgkgminute three minutes mcgkgminute three additional minutes atropine mg given intravenously eight minutes dobutamine infusion resting electrocardiogram reveals regular sinus rhythm heart rate beats per minute qs pattern leads v v diffuse nonspecific wave abnormality heart rate increased beats per minute beats per minute maximum predicted target heart rate blood pressure increased maximum mm jjunctional depression seen fast sloping st segments dobutamine infusion ischemic st segment changes seen dobutamine infusion recovery processmyocardial perfusion imaging resting myocardial perfusion spect imaging carried mci tcm myoview dobutamine infusion myocardial perfusion imaging gated scan carried mci tcm myoview lung heart ratio myocardial perfusion images normal rest stress gated myocardial scan revealed normal regional wall motion ejection fraction conclusions stress test negative dobutamineinduced myocardial ischemia normal left ventricular size regional wall motion ejection fraction

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS: ,Chest pain, hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus.,PROCEDURE DONE:, Dobutamine Myoview stress test.,STRESS ECG RESULTS:, The patient was stressed by dobutamine infusion at a rate of 10 mcg/kg/minute for three minutes, 20 mcg/kg/minute for three minutes, and 30 mcg/kg/minute for three additional minutes. Atropine 0.25 mg was given intravenously eight minutes into the dobutamine infusion. The resting electrocardiogram reveals a regular sinus rhythm with heart rate of 86 beats per minute, QS pattern in leads V1 and V2, and diffuse nonspecific T wave abnormality. The heart rate increased from 86 beats per minute to 155 beats per minute, which is about 90% of the maximum predicted target heart rate. The blood pressure increased from 130/80 to 160/70. A maximum of 1 mm J-junctional depression was seen with fast up sloping ST segments during dobutamine infusion. No ischemic ST segment changes were seen during dobutamine infusion or during the recovery process.,MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING:, Resting myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging was carried out with 10.9 mCi of Tc-99m Myoview. Dobutamine infusion myocardial perfusion imaging and gated scan were carried out with 29.2 mCi of Tc-99m Myoview. The lung heart ratio is 0.36. Myocardial perfusion images were normal both at rest and with stress. Gated myocardial scan revealed normal regional wall motion and ejection fraction of 67%.,CONCLUSIONS:,1. Stress test is negative for dobutamine-induced myocardial ischemia.,2. Normal left ventricular size, regional wall motion, and ejection fraction. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATIONS: ,Chest pain.,STRESS TECHNIQUE:,

indications chest painstress technique

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS: ,Chest pain.,STRESS TECHNIQUE:, ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATIONS: , An 82-year-old man entering the cardiac rehabilitation program 6 weeks after a porcine aortic valve replacement and single-vessel coronary bypass graft procedure. The patient has had a complicated postoperative course with rapid atrial fibrillation, pleural effusions, anemia and thrombocytopenia. He is currently stabilized and improving in strength. He is living in Nantucket with his daughter Debra Anderson while he recuperates and completes the cardiac rehabilitation program. He has a few other significant medical problems.,MEDICATIONS:,1. Toprol-XL 25 mg daily.,2. Simvastatin 80 mg daily.,3. Aspirin 81 mg daily.,4. Synthroid 0.5 mg daily.,5. Warfarin 1.5 mg daily.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , The patient appears pale and fragile. He is comfortable at rest. His resting heart rate is 80. His resting blood pressure is 112/70. His conjunctivae are pale. His lungs have decreased breath sounds throughout and dullness at the bases bilaterally. Heart exam reveals a distant S1 and S2. There is a short 2/6 systolic ejection murmur. The extremities are normal without clubbing, cyanosis or edema.,The resting echocardiogram showed a sinus rhythm at 70 beats per minute. There is poor R wave progression across the pericardium and Q waves inferiorly.,DESCRIPTION: ,The patient exercised according to the modified Bruce protocol stopping at 3 minutes and 20 seconds with fatigue and shortness of breath. He did not experience chest pain with exercise. He did achieve a maximal heart rate of 100, which is 72% of his maximal predicted heart rate. His maximal blood pressure was 190/70 resulting in a double product of 19,000 and achieving 2.3 METS. As noted, the resting electrocardiogram had inferior Q waves and poor R wave progression. There were no significant ST segment changes with exercise. There were only rare ventricular premature beats with exercise.,CONCLUSION:,1. Poor exercise capacity 6 weeks following an aortic valve replacement and single-vessel bypass procedure.,2. No chest pain with exercise.,3. No significant ECG changes with exercise.,4. The patient is considered stable to enter our cardiac rehabilitation program. I recommend the patient have a complete blood count, basic metabolic profile, and TSH obtained prior to entering the rehab program.

indications yearold man entering cardiac rehabilitation program weeks porcine aortic valve replacement singlevessel coronary bypass graft procedure patient complicated postoperative course rapid atrial fibrillation pleural effusions anemia thrombocytopenia currently stabilized improving strength living nantucket daughter debra anderson recuperates completes cardiac rehabilitation program significant medical problemsmedications toprolxl mg daily simvastatin mg daily aspirin mg daily synthroid mg daily warfarin mg dailyphysical examination patient appears pale fragile comfortable rest resting heart rate resting blood pressure conjunctivae pale lungs decreased breath sounds throughout dullness bases bilaterally heart exam reveals distant short systolic ejection murmur extremities normal without clubbing cyanosis edemathe resting echocardiogram showed sinus rhythm beats per minute poor r wave progression across pericardium q waves inferiorlydescription patient exercised according modified bruce protocol stopping minutes seconds fatigue shortness breath experience chest pain exercise achieve maximal heart rate maximal predicted heart rate maximal blood pressure resulting double product achieving mets noted resting electrocardiogram inferior q waves poor r wave progression significant st segment changes exercise rare ventricular premature beats exerciseconclusion poor exercise capacity weeks following aortic valve replacement singlevessel bypass procedure chest pain exercise significant ecg changes exercise patient considered stable enter cardiac rehabilitation program recommend patient complete blood count basic metabolic profile tsh obtained prior entering rehab program

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS: , An 82-year-old man entering the cardiac rehabilitation program 6 weeks after a porcine aortic valve replacement and single-vessel coronary bypass graft procedure. The patient has had a complicated postoperative course with rapid atrial fibrillation, pleural effusions, anemia and thrombocytopenia. He is currently stabilized and improving in strength. He is living in Nantucket with his daughter Debra Anderson while he recuperates and completes the cardiac rehabilitation program. He has a few other significant medical problems.,MEDICATIONS:,1. Toprol-XL 25 mg daily.,2. Simvastatin 80 mg daily.,3. Aspirin 81 mg daily.,4. Synthroid 0.5 mg daily.,5. Warfarin 1.5 mg daily.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , The patient appears pale and fragile. He is comfortable at rest. His resting heart rate is 80. His resting blood pressure is 112/70. His conjunctivae are pale. His lungs have decreased breath sounds throughout and dullness at the bases bilaterally. Heart exam reveals a distant S1 and S2. There is a short 2/6 systolic ejection murmur. The extremities are normal without clubbing, cyanosis or edema.,The resting echocardiogram showed a sinus rhythm at 70 beats per minute. There is poor R wave progression across the pericardium and Q waves inferiorly.,DESCRIPTION: ,The patient exercised according to the modified Bruce protocol stopping at 3 minutes and 20 seconds with fatigue and shortness of breath. He did not experience chest pain with exercise. He did achieve a maximal heart rate of 100, which is 72% of his maximal predicted heart rate. His maximal blood pressure was 190/70 resulting in a double product of 19,000 and achieving 2.3 METS. As noted, the resting electrocardiogram had inferior Q waves and poor R wave progression. There were no significant ST segment changes with exercise. There were only rare ventricular premature beats with exercise.,CONCLUSION:,1. Poor exercise capacity 6 weeks following an aortic valve replacement and single-vessel bypass procedure.,2. No chest pain with exercise.,3. No significant ECG changes with exercise.,4. The patient is considered stable to enter our cardiac rehabilitation program. I recommend the patient have a complete blood count, basic metabolic profile, and TSH obtained prior to entering the rehab program. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INDICATIONS: , Predominant rhythm is sinus. Heart rate varied between 56-128 beats per minute, average heart rate of 75 beats per minute. Minimum heart rate of 50 beats per minute.,640 ventricular ectopic isolated beats noted. Rare isolated APCs and supraventricular couplets.,One supraventricular triplet reported.,Triplet maximum rate of 178 beats per minute noted.

indications predominant rhythm sinus heart rate varied beats per minute average heart rate beats per minute minimum heart rate beats per minute ventricular ectopic isolated beats noted rare isolated apcs supraventricular coupletsone supraventricular triplet reportedtriplet maximum rate beats per minute noted

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS: , Predominant rhythm is sinus. Heart rate varied between 56-128 beats per minute, average heart rate of 75 beats per minute. Minimum heart rate of 50 beats per minute.,640 ventricular ectopic isolated beats noted. Rare isolated APCs and supraventricular couplets.,One supraventricular triplet reported.,Triplet maximum rate of 178 beats per minute noted. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INDICATIONS: , Preoperative cardiac evaluation in the patient with chest pain in the setting of left hip fracture.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS:, The patient is a 78-year-old white female with no prior cardiac history. She sustained a mechanical fall with a subsequent left femoral neck fracture. She was transferred to XYZ Hospital for definitive care. In the emergency department of XYZ, the patient described six to seven seconds of sharp chest pain without radiation, without associated symptoms. Electrocardiogram was obtained, which showed nonspecific ST-segment flattening in the high lateral leads I, aVL. She also had a left axis deviation. Serial troponins were obtained. She has had four negative troponins since admission. Due to age and chest pain history, a cardiology consultation was requested preoperatively.,At the time of my evaluation, the patient complained of left hip pain, but no chest pain, dyspnea, or symptomatic dysrhythmia.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:,1. Mesothelioma.,2. Recurrent urinary tract infections.,3. Gastroesophageal reflux disease/gastritis.,4. Osteopenia.,5. Right sciatica.,6. Hypothyroidism.,7. Peripheral neuropathy.,8. Fibromyalgia.,9. Chart review also suggests she has atherosclerotic heart disease and pneumothorax. The patient denies either of these.,PAST SURGICAL HISTORY:,1. Tonsillectomy.,2. Hysterectomy.,3. Appendectomy.,4. Thyroidectomy.,5. Coccygectomy.,6. Cystoscopies times several.,7. Bladder neck resuspension.,8. Multiple breast biopsies.,ALLERGIES: , NO KNOWN DRUG ALLERGIES.,MEDICATIONS:, At the time of evaluation include, 1. Cefazolin 1 g intravenous (IV). 2. Morphine sulfate. 3. Ondansetron p.r.n.,OUTPATIENT MEDICATIONS: , 1. Robaxin. 2. Detrol 4 mg q.h.s. 3. Neurontin 300 mg p.o. t.i.d. 4. Armour Thyroid 90 mg p.o. daily. 5. Temazepam, dose unknown p.r.n. 6. Chloral hydrate, dose unknown p.r.n.,FAMILY HISTORY: , Mother had myocardial infarction in her 40s, died of heart disease in her 60s, specifics not known. She knows nothing of her father's history. She has no siblings. There is no other history of premature atherosclerotic heart disease in the family.,SOCIAL HISTORY: , The patient is married, lives with her husband. She is a lifetime nonsmoker, nondrinker. She has not been getting regular exercise for approximately two years due to chronic sciatic pain.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: ,GENERAL: The patient is able to walk one block or less prior to the onset of significant leg pain. She ever denies any cardiac symptoms with this degree of exertion. She denies any dyspnea on exertion or chest pain with activities of daily living. She does sleep on two to three pillows, but denies orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. She does have chronic lower extremity edema. Her husband states that she has had prior chest pain in the past, but this has always been attributed to gastritis. She denies any palpitations or tachycardia. She has remote history of presyncope, no true syncope.,HEMATOLOGIC: Negative for bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.,ONCOLOGIC: Remarkable for past medical history.,PULMONARY: Remarkable for childhood pneumonia times several. No recurrent pneumonias, bronchitis, reactive airway disease as an adult.,GASTROINTESTINAL: Remarkable for past medical history.,GENITOURINARY: Remarkable for past medical history.,MUSCULOSKELETAL: Remarkable for past medical history.,CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM: Negative for tic, tremor, transient ischemic attack (TIA), seizure, or stroke.,PSYCHIATRIC: Remarkable for history of depression as an adolescent, she was hospitalized at State Mental Institution as a young woman. No recurrence.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:,GENERAL: This is a well-nourished, well-groomed elderly white female who is appropriate and articulate at the time of evaluation.,VITAL SIGNS: She has had a low-grade temperature of 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit on 11/20/2006, currently 99.6. Pulse ranges from 123 to 86 beats per minute. Blood pressure ranges from 124/65 to 152/67 mmHg. Oxygen saturation on 2 L nasal cannula was 94%.,HEENT: Exam is benign. Normocephalic and atraumatic. Extraocular motions are intact. Sclerae anicteric. Conjunctivae noninjected. She does have bilateral arcus senilis. Oral mucosa is pink and moist.

indications preoperative cardiac evaluation patient chest pain setting left hip fracturehistory present illness patient yearold white female prior cardiac history sustained mechanical fall subsequent left femoral neck fracture transferred xyz hospital definitive care emergency department xyz patient described six seven seconds sharp chest pain without radiation without associated symptoms electrocardiogram obtained showed nonspecific stsegment flattening high lateral leads avl also left axis deviation serial troponins obtained four negative troponins since admission due age chest pain history cardiology consultation requested preoperativelyat time evaluation patient complained left hip pain chest pain dyspnea symptomatic dysrhythmiapast medical history mesothelioma recurrent urinary tract infections gastroesophageal reflux diseasegastritis osteopenia right sciatica hypothyroidism peripheral neuropathy fibromyalgia chart review also suggests atherosclerotic heart disease pneumothorax patient denies either thesepast surgical history tonsillectomy hysterectomy appendectomy thyroidectomy coccygectomy cystoscopies times several bladder neck resuspension multiple breast biopsiesallergies known drug allergiesmedications time evaluation include cefazolin g intravenous iv morphine sulfate ondansetron prnoutpatient medications robaxin detrol mg qhs neurontin mg po tid armour thyroid mg po daily temazepam dose unknown prn chloral hydrate dose unknown prnfamily history mother myocardial infarction died heart disease specifics known knows nothing fathers history siblings history premature atherosclerotic heart disease familysocial history patient married lives husband lifetime nonsmoker nondrinker getting regular exercise approximately two years due chronic sciatic painreview systems general patient able walk one block less prior onset significant leg pain ever denies cardiac symptoms degree exertion denies dyspnea exertion chest pain activities daily living sleep two three pillows denies orthopnea paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea chronic lower extremity edema husband states prior chest pain past always attributed gastritis denies palpitations tachycardia remote history presyncope true syncopehematologic negative bleeding diathesis coagulopathyoncologic remarkable past medical historypulmonary remarkable childhood pneumonia times several recurrent pneumonias bronchitis reactive airway disease adultgastrointestinal remarkable past medical historygenitourinary remarkable past medical historymusculoskeletal remarkable past medical historycentral nervous system negative tic tremor transient ischemic attack tia seizure strokepsychiatric remarkable history depression adolescent hospitalized state mental institution young woman recurrencephysical examinationgeneral wellnourished wellgroomed elderly white female appropriate articulate time evaluationvital signs lowgrade temperature degrees fahrenheit currently pulse ranges beats per minute blood pressure ranges mmhg oxygen saturation l nasal cannula heent exam benign normocephalic atraumatic extraocular motions intact sclerae anicteric conjunctivae noninjected bilateral arcus senilis oral mucosa pink moist

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS: , Preoperative cardiac evaluation in the patient with chest pain in the setting of left hip fracture.,HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS:, The patient is a 78-year-old white female with no prior cardiac history. She sustained a mechanical fall with a subsequent left femoral neck fracture. She was transferred to XYZ Hospital for definitive care. In the emergency department of XYZ, the patient described six to seven seconds of sharp chest pain without radiation, without associated symptoms. Electrocardiogram was obtained, which showed nonspecific ST-segment flattening in the high lateral leads I, aVL. She also had a left axis deviation. Serial troponins were obtained. She has had four negative troponins since admission. Due to age and chest pain history, a cardiology consultation was requested preoperatively.,At the time of my evaluation, the patient complained of left hip pain, but no chest pain, dyspnea, or symptomatic dysrhythmia.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:,1. Mesothelioma.,2. Recurrent urinary tract infections.,3. Gastroesophageal reflux disease/gastritis.,4. Osteopenia.,5. Right sciatica.,6. Hypothyroidism.,7. Peripheral neuropathy.,8. Fibromyalgia.,9. Chart review also suggests she has atherosclerotic heart disease and pneumothorax. The patient denies either of these.,PAST SURGICAL HISTORY:,1. Tonsillectomy.,2. Hysterectomy.,3. Appendectomy.,4. Thyroidectomy.,5. Coccygectomy.,6. Cystoscopies times several.,7. Bladder neck resuspension.,8. Multiple breast biopsies.,ALLERGIES: , NO KNOWN DRUG ALLERGIES.,MEDICATIONS:, At the time of evaluation include, 1. Cefazolin 1 g intravenous (IV). 2. Morphine sulfate. 3. Ondansetron p.r.n.,OUTPATIENT MEDICATIONS: , 1. Robaxin. 2. Detrol 4 mg q.h.s. 3. Neurontin 300 mg p.o. t.i.d. 4. Armour Thyroid 90 mg p.o. daily. 5. Temazepam, dose unknown p.r.n. 6. Chloral hydrate, dose unknown p.r.n.,FAMILY HISTORY: , Mother had myocardial infarction in her 40s, died of heart disease in her 60s, specifics not known. She knows nothing of her father's history. She has no siblings. There is no other history of premature atherosclerotic heart disease in the family.,SOCIAL HISTORY: , The patient is married, lives with her husband. She is a lifetime nonsmoker, nondrinker. She has not been getting regular exercise for approximately two years due to chronic sciatic pain.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: ,GENERAL: The patient is able to walk one block or less prior to the onset of significant leg pain. She ever denies any cardiac symptoms with this degree of exertion. She denies any dyspnea on exertion or chest pain with activities of daily living. She does sleep on two to three pillows, but denies orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. She does have chronic lower extremity edema. Her husband states that she has had prior chest pain in the past, but this has always been attributed to gastritis. She denies any palpitations or tachycardia. She has remote history of presyncope, no true syncope.,HEMATOLOGIC: Negative for bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.,ONCOLOGIC: Remarkable for past medical history.,PULMONARY: Remarkable for childhood pneumonia times several. No recurrent pneumonias, bronchitis, reactive airway disease as an adult.,GASTROINTESTINAL: Remarkable for past medical history.,GENITOURINARY: Remarkable for past medical history.,MUSCULOSKELETAL: Remarkable for past medical history.,CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM: Negative for tic, tremor, transient ischemic attack (TIA), seizure, or stroke.,PSYCHIATRIC: Remarkable for history of depression as an adolescent, she was hospitalized at State Mental Institution as a young woman. No recurrence.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:,GENERAL: This is a well-nourished, well-groomed elderly white female who is appropriate and articulate at the time of evaluation.,VITAL SIGNS: She has had a low-grade temperature of 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit on 11/20/2006, currently 99.6. Pulse ranges from 123 to 86 beats per minute. Blood pressure ranges from 124/65 to 152/67 mmHg. Oxygen saturation on 2 L nasal cannula was 94%.,HEENT: Exam is benign. Normocephalic and atraumatic. Extraocular motions are intact. Sclerae anicteric. Conjunctivae noninjected. She does have bilateral arcus senilis. Oral mucosa is pink and moist. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Consult - History and Phy.

INDICATIONS: , The patient is a 22-year-old female with past medical history of syncope. The patient is also complaining of dizziness. She was referred here by Dr. X for tilt table.,TECHNIQUE: , Risks and benefits explained to the patient. Consent obtained. She was lying down on her back for 20 minutes and her blood pressure was 111/75 and heart rate 89. She was standing up on the tilt tablet for 20 minutes and her heart rate went up to 127 and blood pressure was still in 120/80. Then, the patient received sublingual nitroglycerin 0.4 mg. The patient felt dizzy at that time and heart rate was in the 120 and blood pressure was 110/50. The patient felt nauseous and felt hot at that time. She did not pass out.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,Tilt table was then terminated.,SUMMARY:, Positive tilt table for vasovagal syncope with significant increase of heart rate with minimal decrease of blood pressure.,RECOMMENDATIONS: , I recommend followup in the office in one week and she will need Toprol-XL 12.5 mg every day if symptoms persist.

indications patient yearold female past medical history syncope patient also complaining dizziness referred dr x tilt tabletechnique risks benefits explained patient consent obtained lying back minutes blood pressure heart rate standing tilt tablet minutes heart rate went blood pressure still patient received sublingual nitroglycerin mg patient felt dizzy time heart rate blood pressure patient felt nauseous felt hot time pass outcomplications nonetilt table terminatedsummary positive tilt table vasovagal syncope significant increase heart rate minimal decrease blood pressurerecommendations recommend followup office one week need toprolxl mg every day symptoms persist

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS: , The patient is a 22-year-old female with past medical history of syncope. The patient is also complaining of dizziness. She was referred here by Dr. X for tilt table.,TECHNIQUE: , Risks and benefits explained to the patient. Consent obtained. She was lying down on her back for 20 minutes and her blood pressure was 111/75 and heart rate 89. She was standing up on the tilt tablet for 20 minutes and her heart rate went up to 127 and blood pressure was still in 120/80. Then, the patient received sublingual nitroglycerin 0.4 mg. The patient felt dizzy at that time and heart rate was in the 120 and blood pressure was 110/50. The patient felt nauseous and felt hot at that time. She did not pass out.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,Tilt table was then terminated.,SUMMARY:, Positive tilt table for vasovagal syncope with significant increase of heart rate with minimal decrease of blood pressure.,RECOMMENDATIONS: , I recommend followup in the office in one week and she will need Toprol-XL 12.5 mg every day if symptoms persist. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INDICATIONS: , This is a 55-year-old female who is having a colonoscopy to screen for colon cancer. There is no family history of colon cancer and there has been no blood in the stool.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Colonoscopy.,PREP: , Fentanyl 100 mcg IV and 3 mg Versed IV.,PROCEDURE:, The tip of the endoscope was introduced into the rectum. Retroflexion of the tip of the endoscope failed to reveal any distal rectal lesions. The rest of the colon through to the cecum was well visualized. The cecal strap, ileocecal valve, and light reflex in the right lower quadrant were all identified. There was no evidence of tumor, polyp, mass, ulceration, or other focus of inflammation. Adverse reactions none.,IMPRESSION:, Normal colonic mucosa through to the cecum. There was no evidence of tumor or polyp.

indications yearold female colonoscopy screen colon cancer family history colon cancer blood stoolprocedure performed colonoscopyprep fentanyl mcg iv mg versed ivprocedure tip endoscope introduced rectum retroflexion tip endoscope failed reveal distal rectal lesions rest colon cecum well visualized cecal strap ileocecal valve light reflex right lower quadrant identified evidence tumor polyp mass ulceration focus inflammation adverse reactions noneimpression normal colonic mucosa cecum evidence tumor polyp

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS: , This is a 55-year-old female who is having a colonoscopy to screen for colon cancer. There is no family history of colon cancer and there has been no blood in the stool.,PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ,Colonoscopy.,PREP: , Fentanyl 100 mcg IV and 3 mg Versed IV.,PROCEDURE:, The tip of the endoscope was introduced into the rectum. Retroflexion of the tip of the endoscope failed to reveal any distal rectal lesions. The rest of the colon through to the cecum was well visualized. The cecal strap, ileocecal valve, and light reflex in the right lower quadrant were all identified. There was no evidence of tumor, polyp, mass, ulceration, or other focus of inflammation. Adverse reactions none.,IMPRESSION:, Normal colonic mucosa through to the cecum. There was no evidence of tumor or polyp. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

INDICATIONS:,

indications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS:, ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology, words_count

INDICATIONS:, Atrial fibrillation, coronary disease.,STRESS TECHNIQUE:, The patient was infused with dobutamine to a maximum heart rate of 142. ECG exhibits atrial fibrillation.,IMAGE TECHNIQUE:, The patient was injected with 5.2 millicuries of thallous chloride and subsequently imaged on the gated tomographic SPECT system.,IMAGE ANALYSIS:, It should be noted that the images are limited slightly by the patient's obesity with a weight of 263 pounds. There is normal LV myocardial perfusion. The LV systolic ejection fraction is normal at 65%. There is normal global and regional wall motion.,CONCLUSIONS:,1. Basic rhythm of atrial fibrillation with no change during dobutamine stress, maximum heart rate of 142.,2. Normal LV myocardial perfusion.,3. Normal LV systolic ejection fraction of 65%.,4. Normal global and regional wall motion.

indications atrial fibrillation coronary diseasestress technique patient infused dobutamine maximum heart rate ecg exhibits atrial fibrillationimage technique patient injected millicuries thallous chloride subsequently imaged gated tomographic spect systemimage analysis noted images limited slightly patients obesity weight pounds normal lv myocardial perfusion lv systolic ejection fraction normal normal global regional wall motionconclusions basic rhythm atrial fibrillation change dobutamine stress maximum heart rate normal lv myocardial perfusion normal lv systolic ejection fraction normal global regional wall motion

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS:, Atrial fibrillation, coronary disease.,STRESS TECHNIQUE:, The patient was infused with dobutamine to a maximum heart rate of 142. ECG exhibits atrial fibrillation.,IMAGE TECHNIQUE:, The patient was injected with 5.2 millicuries of thallous chloride and subsequently imaged on the gated tomographic SPECT system.,IMAGE ANALYSIS:, It should be noted that the images are limited slightly by the patient's obesity with a weight of 263 pounds. There is normal LV myocardial perfusion. The LV systolic ejection fraction is normal at 65%. There is normal global and regional wall motion.,CONCLUSIONS:,1. Basic rhythm of atrial fibrillation with no change during dobutamine stress, maximum heart rate of 142.,2. Normal LV myocardial perfusion.,3. Normal LV systolic ejection fraction of 65%.,4. Normal global and regional wall motion. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATIONS:, Chest pain.,PROCEDURE DONE:, Graded exercise treadmill stress test.,STRESS ECG RESULTS:, The patient was stressed by continuous graded treadmill testing for nine minutes of the standard Bruce protocol. The heart rate increased from 68 beats per minute to 178 beats per minute, which is 100% of the maximum predicted target heart rate. The blood pressure increased from 120/70 to 130/80. The baseline resting electrocardiogram reveals a regular sinus rhythm. The tracing is within normal limits. Symptoms of chest pain occurred with exercise. The pain persisted during the recovery process and was aggravated by deep inspiration. Marked chest wall tenderness noted. There were no ischemic ST segment changes seen during exercise or during the recovery process.,CONCLUSIONS,:,1. Stress test is negative for ischemia.,2. Chest wall tenderness occurred with exercise.,3. Blood pressure response to exercise is normal.

indications chest painprocedure done graded exercise treadmill stress teststress ecg results patient stressed continuous graded treadmill testing nine minutes standard bruce protocol heart rate increased beats per minute beats per minute maximum predicted target heart rate blood pressure increased baseline resting electrocardiogram reveals regular sinus rhythm tracing within normal limits symptoms chest pain occurred exercise pain persisted recovery process aggravated deep inspiration marked chest wall tenderness noted ischemic st segment changes seen exercise recovery processconclusions stress test negative ischemia chest wall tenderness occurred exercise blood pressure response exercise normal

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS:, Chest pain.,PROCEDURE DONE:, Graded exercise treadmill stress test.,STRESS ECG RESULTS:, The patient was stressed by continuous graded treadmill testing for nine minutes of the standard Bruce protocol. The heart rate increased from 68 beats per minute to 178 beats per minute, which is 100% of the maximum predicted target heart rate. The blood pressure increased from 120/70 to 130/80. The baseline resting electrocardiogram reveals a regular sinus rhythm. The tracing is within normal limits. Symptoms of chest pain occurred with exercise. The pain persisted during the recovery process and was aggravated by deep inspiration. Marked chest wall tenderness noted. There were no ischemic ST segment changes seen during exercise or during the recovery process.,CONCLUSIONS,:,1. Stress test is negative for ischemia.,2. Chest wall tenderness occurred with exercise.,3. Blood pressure response to exercise is normal. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATIONS:, Dysphagia.,PREMEDICATION:, Topical Cetacaine spray and Versed IV.,PROCEDURE:,: The scope was passed into the esophagus under direct vision. The esophageal mucosa was all unremarkable. There was no evidence of any narrowing present anywhere throughout the esophagus and no evidence of esophagitis. The scope was passed on down into the stomach. The gastric mucosa was all examined including a retroflexed view of the fundus and there were no abnormalities seen. The scope was then passed into the duodenum and the duodenal bulb and second and third portions of the duodenum were unremarkable. The scope was again slowly withdrawn through the esophagus and no evidence of narrowing was present. The scope was then withdrawn.,IMPRESSION:, Normal upper GI endoscopy without any evidence of anatomical narrowing.

indications dysphagiapremedication topical cetacaine spray versed ivprocedure scope passed esophagus direct vision esophageal mucosa unremarkable evidence narrowing present anywhere throughout esophagus evidence esophagitis scope passed stomach gastric mucosa examined including retroflexed view fundus abnormalities seen scope passed duodenum duodenal bulb second third portions duodenum unremarkable scope slowly withdrawn esophagus evidence narrowing present scope withdrawnimpression normal upper gi endoscopy without evidence anatomical narrowing

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS:, Dysphagia.,PREMEDICATION:, Topical Cetacaine spray and Versed IV.,PROCEDURE:,: The scope was passed into the esophagus under direct vision. The esophageal mucosa was all unremarkable. There was no evidence of any narrowing present anywhere throughout the esophagus and no evidence of esophagitis. The scope was passed on down into the stomach. The gastric mucosa was all examined including a retroflexed view of the fundus and there were no abnormalities seen. The scope was then passed into the duodenum and the duodenal bulb and second and third portions of the duodenum were unremarkable. The scope was again slowly withdrawn through the esophagus and no evidence of narrowing was present. The scope was then withdrawn.,IMPRESSION:, Normal upper GI endoscopy without any evidence of anatomical narrowing. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

INDICATIONS:, Ischemic cardiomyopathy, status post inferior wall myocardial infarction, status post left anterior descending PTCA and stenting.,PROCEDURE DONE:, Adenosine Myoview stress test.,STRESS ECG RESULTS:, The patient was stressed by intravenous adenosine, 140 mcg/kg/minute infused over four minutes. The baseline resting electrocardiogram revealed an electronic pacemaker depolarizing the ventricles regularly at a rate of 70 beats per minute. Underlying atrial fibrillation noted, very wide QRS complexes. The heart rate remained unchanged at 70 beats per minute as the blood pressure decreased from 140/80 to 110/70 with adenosine infusion.

indications ischemic cardiomyopathy status post inferior wall myocardial infarction status post left anterior descending ptca stentingprocedure done adenosine myoview stress teststress ecg results patient stressed intravenous adenosine mcgkgminute infused four minutes baseline resting electrocardiogram revealed electronic pacemaker depolarizing ventricles regularly rate beats per minute underlying atrial fibrillation noted wide qrs complexes heart rate remained unchanged beats per minute blood pressure decreased adenosine infusion

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS:, Ischemic cardiomyopathy, status post inferior wall myocardial infarction, status post left anterior descending PTCA and stenting.,PROCEDURE DONE:, Adenosine Myoview stress test.,STRESS ECG RESULTS:, The patient was stressed by intravenous adenosine, 140 mcg/kg/minute infused over four minutes. The baseline resting electrocardiogram revealed an electronic pacemaker depolarizing the ventricles regularly at a rate of 70 beats per minute. Underlying atrial fibrillation noted, very wide QRS complexes. The heart rate remained unchanged at 70 beats per minute as the blood pressure decreased from 140/80 to 110/70 with adenosine infusion. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATIONS:, Peripheral vascular disease with claudication.,RIGHT:, ,1. Normal arterial imaging of right lower extremity.,2. Peak systolic velocity is normal.,3. Arterial waveform is triphasic.,4. Ankle brachial index is 0.96.,LEFT:,1. Normal arterial imaging of left lower extremity.,2. Peak systolic velocity is normal.,3. Arterial waveform is triphasic throughout except in posterior tibial artery where it is biphasic.,4. Ankle brachial index is 1.06.,IMPRESSION,:,Normal arterial imaging of both lower extremities.

indications peripheral vascular disease claudicationright normal arterial imaging right lower extremity peak systolic velocity normal arterial waveform triphasic ankle brachial index left normal arterial imaging left lower extremity peak systolic velocity normal arterial waveform triphasic throughout except posterior tibial artery biphasic ankle brachial index impressionnormal arterial imaging lower extremities

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS:, Peripheral vascular disease with claudication.,RIGHT:, ,1. Normal arterial imaging of right lower extremity.,2. Peak systolic velocity is normal.,3. Arterial waveform is triphasic.,4. Ankle brachial index is 0.96.,LEFT:,1. Normal arterial imaging of left lower extremity.,2. Peak systolic velocity is normal.,3. Arterial waveform is triphasic throughout except in posterior tibial artery where it is biphasic.,4. Ankle brachial index is 1.06.,IMPRESSION,:,Normal arterial imaging of both lower extremities. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INDICATIONS:, Previously markedly abnormal dobutamine Myoview stress test and gated scan.,PROCEDURE DONE:, Resting Myoview perfusion scan and gated myocardial scan.,MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING:, Resting myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging and gated scan were carried out with 32.6 mCi of Tc-99m Myoview. Rest study was done and compared to previous dobutamine Myoview stress test done on Month DD, YYYY. The lung heart ratio is 0.34. There appears to be a moderate size inferoapical perfusion defect of moderate degree. The gated myocardial scan revealed mild apical and distal inferoseptal hypokinesis with ejection fraction of 55%.,CONCLUSIONS:, Study done at rest only revealed findings consistent with an inferior non-transmural scar of moderate size and moderate degree. The left ventricular systolic function is markedly improved with much better regional wall motion of all left ventricular segments when compared to previous study done on Month DD, YYYY. We cannot assess the presence of any reversible perfusion defects because no stress imaging was performed.

indications previously markedly abnormal dobutamine myoview stress test gated scanprocedure done resting myoview perfusion scan gated myocardial scanmyocardial perfusion imaging resting myocardial perfusion spect imaging gated scan carried mci tcm myoview rest study done compared previous dobutamine myoview stress test done month dd yyyy lung heart ratio appears moderate size inferoapical perfusion defect moderate degree gated myocardial scan revealed mild apical distal inferoseptal hypokinesis ejection fraction conclusions study done rest revealed findings consistent inferior nontransmural scar moderate size moderate degree left ventricular systolic function markedly improved much better regional wall motion left ventricular segments compared previous study done month dd yyyy cannot assess presence reversible perfusion defects stress imaging performed

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INDICATIONS:, Previously markedly abnormal dobutamine Myoview stress test and gated scan.,PROCEDURE DONE:, Resting Myoview perfusion scan and gated myocardial scan.,MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING:, Resting myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging and gated scan were carried out with 32.6 mCi of Tc-99m Myoview. Rest study was done and compared to previous dobutamine Myoview stress test done on Month DD, YYYY. The lung heart ratio is 0.34. There appears to be a moderate size inferoapical perfusion defect of moderate degree. The gated myocardial scan revealed mild apical and distal inferoseptal hypokinesis with ejection fraction of 55%.,CONCLUSIONS:, Study done at rest only revealed findings consistent with an inferior non-transmural scar of moderate size and moderate degree. The left ventricular systolic function is markedly improved with much better regional wall motion of all left ventricular segments when compared to previous study done on Month DD, YYYY. We cannot assess the presence of any reversible perfusion defects because no stress imaging was performed. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

INFORMANT:, Dad on phone. Transferred from ABCD Memorial Hospital, rule out sepsis.,HISTORY: ,This is a 3-week-old, NSVD, Caucasian baby boy transferred from ABCD Memorial Hospital for rule out sepsis and possible congenital heart disease. The patient had a fever of 100.1 on 09/13/2006 taken rectally, and mom being a nurse, took the baby to the hospital and he was admitted for rule out sepsis. All the sepsis workup was done, CBC, UA, LP, and CMP, and since a murmur was noted 2/5, he also had an echo done. The patient was put on ampicillin and cefotaxime. Echo results came back and they showed patent foramen ovale/ASD with primary pulmonary stenosis and then considering severe congenital heart disease, he was transferred here on vancomycin, ampicillin, and cefotaxime. The patient was n.p.o. when he came in. He was on 3/4 L of oxygen. According to the note, it conveyed that he had some subcostal retractions. On arriving here, baby looks very healthy. He has no subcostal retractions. He is not requiring any oxygen and he is positive for urine and stool. The stool is although green in color, and in the morning today, he spiked a fever of 100.1, but right now he is afebrile. ED called that case is a direct admit.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: ,The patient supposedly had fever, some weight loss, poor appetite. The day he had fever, no rash, no ear pain, no congestion, no rhinorrhea, no throat pain, no neck pain, no visual changes, no conjunctivitis, no cough, no dyspnea, no vomiting, no diarrhea, and no dysuria. According to mom, baby felt floppy on the day of fever and he also used to have stools every day 4 to 6 which is yellowish-to-green in color, but today the stool we noticed was green in color. He usually has urine 4 to 5 a day, but the day he had fever, his urine also was low. Mom gave baby some Pedialyte.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, None.,HOSPITALIZATIONS:, Recent transfer from ABCD for the rule out sepsis and heart disease.,BIRTH HISTORY: ,Born on 08/23/2006 at Memorial Hospital, NSVD, no complications. Hospital stay 24 hours. Breast-fed, no formula, no jaundice, 7 pounds 8 ounces.,FAMILY HISTORY:, None.,SURGICAL HISTORY: , None.,SOCIAL HISTORY: ,Lives with mom and dad. Dad is a service manager at GMC; 4-year-old son, who is healthy; and 2 cats, 2 dogs, 3 chickens, 1 frog. They usually visit to a ranch, but not recently. No sick contact and no travel.,MEDICATIONS: , Has been on vancomycin, cefotaxime, and ampicillin.,ALLERGIES:, No allergies.,DIET:, Breast feeds q.2h.,IMMUNIZATIONS: , No immunizations.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:,VITAL SIGNS: Temperature 99, pulse 158, respiratory rate 68, blood pressure 87/48, oxygen 100% on room air.,MEASUREMENTS: Weight 3.725 kg.,GENERAL: Alert and comfortable and sleeping.,SKIN: No rash.,HEENT: Intact extraocular movements. PERRLA. No nasal discharge. No nasal cannula, but no oxygen is flowing active, and anterior fontanelle is flat.,NECK: Soft, nontender, supple.,CHEST: CTAP.,GI: Bowel sounds present. Nontender, nondistended.,GU: Bilaterally descended testes.,BACK: Straight.,NEUROLOGIC: Nonfocal.,EXTREMITIES: No edema. Bilateral pedal pulses present and upper arm pulses are also present.,LABORATORY DATA:, As drawn on 09/13/2006 at ABCD showed WBC 4.2, hemoglobin 11.8, hematocrit 34.7, platelets 480,000. Sodium 140, potassium 4.9, chloride 105, bicarbonate 28, BUN 7, creatinine 0.4, glucose 80, CRP 0.5. Neutrophils 90, bands 7, lymphocytes 27, monocytes 12, and eosinophils 4. Chest x-ray done on 09/13/2006 read as mild left upper lobe infiltrate, but as seen here, and discussed with Dr. X, we did not see any infiltrate and CBG was normal. UA and LP results are pending. Also pending are cultures for blood, LP, and urine.,ASSESSMENT AND PLAN: , This is a 3-week-old Caucasian baby boy admitted for rule out sepsis and congenital heart disease.,INFECTIOUS DISEASE/PULMONARY: , Afebrile with so far 20-hour blood cultures, LP and urine cultures are negative. We will get all the results from ABCD and until then we will continue to rule out sepsis protocol and put the patient on ampicillin and cefotaxime. The patient could be having fever due to mild gastroenteritis or urinary tract infection, so to rule out all these things we have to wait for all the results.,CVS: , He had a grade 2/5 murmur status post echo, which showed a patent foramen ovale, as well as primary pulmonary stenosis. These are the normal findings in a newborn as discussed with Dr. Y, so we will just observe the patient. He does not need any further workup.,GASTROINTESTINAL:

informant dad phone transferred abcd memorial hospital rule sepsishistory weekold nsvd caucasian baby boy transferred abcd memorial hospital rule sepsis possible congenital heart disease patient fever taken rectally mom nurse took baby hospital admitted rule sepsis sepsis workup done cbc ua lp cmp since murmur noted also echo done patient put ampicillin cefotaxime echo results came back showed patent foramen ovaleasd primary pulmonary stenosis considering severe congenital heart disease transferred vancomycin ampicillin cefotaxime patient npo came l oxygen according note conveyed subcostal retractions arriving baby looks healthy subcostal retractions requiring oxygen positive urine stool stool although green color morning today spiked fever right afebrile ed called case direct admitreview systems patient supposedly fever weight loss poor appetite day fever rash ear pain congestion rhinorrhea throat pain neck pain visual changes conjunctivitis cough dyspnea vomiting diarrhea dysuria according mom baby felt floppy day fever also used stools every day yellowishtogreen color today stool noticed green color usually urine day day fever urine also low mom gave baby pedialytepast medical history nonehospitalizations recent transfer abcd rule sepsis heart diseasebirth history born memorial hospital nsvd complications hospital stay hours breastfed formula jaundice pounds ouncesfamily history nonesurgical history nonesocial history lives mom dad dad service manager gmc yearold son healthy cats dogs chickens frog usually visit ranch recently sick contact travelmedications vancomycin cefotaxime ampicillinallergies allergiesdiet breast feeds qhimmunizations immunizationsphysical examinationvital signs temperature pulse respiratory rate blood pressure oxygen room airmeasurements weight kggeneral alert comfortable sleepingskin rashheent intact extraocular movements perrla nasal discharge nasal cannula oxygen flowing active anterior fontanelle flatneck soft nontender supplechest ctapgi bowel sounds present nontender nondistendedgu bilaterally descended testesback straightneurologic nonfocalextremities edema bilateral pedal pulses present upper arm pulses also presentlaboratory data drawn abcd showed wbc hemoglobin hematocrit platelets sodium potassium chloride bicarbonate bun creatinine glucose crp neutrophils bands lymphocytes monocytes eosinophils chest xray done read mild left upper lobe infiltrate seen discussed dr x see infiltrate cbg normal ua lp results pending also pending cultures blood lp urineassessment plan weekold caucasian baby boy admitted rule sepsis congenital heart diseaseinfectious diseasepulmonary afebrile far hour blood cultures lp urine cultures negative get results abcd continue rule sepsis protocol put patient ampicillin cefotaxime patient could fever due mild gastroenteritis urinary tract infection rule things wait resultscvs grade murmur status post echo showed patent foramen ovale well primary pulmonary stenosis normal findings newborn discussed dr observe patient need workupgastrointestinal

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INFORMANT:, Dad on phone. Transferred from ABCD Memorial Hospital, rule out sepsis.,HISTORY: ,This is a 3-week-old, NSVD, Caucasian baby boy transferred from ABCD Memorial Hospital for rule out sepsis and possible congenital heart disease. The patient had a fever of 100.1 on 09/13/2006 taken rectally, and mom being a nurse, took the baby to the hospital and he was admitted for rule out sepsis. All the sepsis workup was done, CBC, UA, LP, and CMP, and since a murmur was noted 2/5, he also had an echo done. The patient was put on ampicillin and cefotaxime. Echo results came back and they showed patent foramen ovale/ASD with primary pulmonary stenosis and then considering severe congenital heart disease, he was transferred here on vancomycin, ampicillin, and cefotaxime. The patient was n.p.o. when he came in. He was on 3/4 L of oxygen. According to the note, it conveyed that he had some subcostal retractions. On arriving here, baby looks very healthy. He has no subcostal retractions. He is not requiring any oxygen and he is positive for urine and stool. The stool is although green in color, and in the morning today, he spiked a fever of 100.1, but right now he is afebrile. ED called that case is a direct admit.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: ,The patient supposedly had fever, some weight loss, poor appetite. The day he had fever, no rash, no ear pain, no congestion, no rhinorrhea, no throat pain, no neck pain, no visual changes, no conjunctivitis, no cough, no dyspnea, no vomiting, no diarrhea, and no dysuria. According to mom, baby felt floppy on the day of fever and he also used to have stools every day 4 to 6 which is yellowish-to-green in color, but today the stool we noticed was green in color. He usually has urine 4 to 5 a day, but the day he had fever, his urine also was low. Mom gave baby some Pedialyte.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, None.,HOSPITALIZATIONS:, Recent transfer from ABCD for the rule out sepsis and heart disease.,BIRTH HISTORY: ,Born on 08/23/2006 at Memorial Hospital, NSVD, no complications. Hospital stay 24 hours. Breast-fed, no formula, no jaundice, 7 pounds 8 ounces.,FAMILY HISTORY:, None.,SURGICAL HISTORY: , None.,SOCIAL HISTORY: ,Lives with mom and dad. Dad is a service manager at GMC; 4-year-old son, who is healthy; and 2 cats, 2 dogs, 3 chickens, 1 frog. They usually visit to a ranch, but not recently. No sick contact and no travel.,MEDICATIONS: , Has been on vancomycin, cefotaxime, and ampicillin.,ALLERGIES:, No allergies.,DIET:, Breast feeds q.2h.,IMMUNIZATIONS: , No immunizations.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:,VITAL SIGNS: Temperature 99, pulse 158, respiratory rate 68, blood pressure 87/48, oxygen 100% on room air.,MEASUREMENTS: Weight 3.725 kg.,GENERAL: Alert and comfortable and sleeping.,SKIN: No rash.,HEENT: Intact extraocular movements. PERRLA. No nasal discharge. No nasal cannula, but no oxygen is flowing active, and anterior fontanelle is flat.,NECK: Soft, nontender, supple.,CHEST: CTAP.,GI: Bowel sounds present. Nontender, nondistended.,GU: Bilaterally descended testes.,BACK: Straight.,NEUROLOGIC: Nonfocal.,EXTREMITIES: No edema. Bilateral pedal pulses present and upper arm pulses are also present.,LABORATORY DATA:, As drawn on 09/13/2006 at ABCD showed WBC 4.2, hemoglobin 11.8, hematocrit 34.7, platelets 480,000. Sodium 140, potassium 4.9, chloride 105, bicarbonate 28, BUN 7, creatinine 0.4, glucose 80, CRP 0.5. Neutrophils 90, bands 7, lymphocytes 27, monocytes 12, and eosinophils 4. Chest x-ray done on 09/13/2006 read as mild left upper lobe infiltrate, but as seen here, and discussed with Dr. X, we did not see any infiltrate and CBG was normal. UA and LP results are pending. Also pending are cultures for blood, LP, and urine.,ASSESSMENT AND PLAN: , This is a 3-week-old Caucasian baby boy admitted for rule out sepsis and congenital heart disease.,INFECTIOUS DISEASE/PULMONARY: , Afebrile with so far 20-hour blood cultures, LP and urine cultures are negative. We will get all the results from ABCD and until then we will continue to rule out sepsis protocol and put the patient on ampicillin and cefotaxime. The patient could be having fever due to mild gastroenteritis or urinary tract infection, so to rule out all these things we have to wait for all the results.,CVS: , He had a grade 2/5 murmur status post echo, which showed a patent foramen ovale, as well as primary pulmonary stenosis. These are the normal findings in a newborn as discussed with Dr. Y, so we will just observe the patient. He does not need any further workup.,GASTROINTESTINAL: ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., Pediatrics - Neonatal

INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY SIMULATION,The patient will receive intensity-modulated radiation therapy in order to deliver high-dose treatment to sensitive structures. The target volume is adjacent to significant radiosensitive structures.,Initially, the preliminary isocenter is set on a fluoroscopically-based simulation unit. The patient is appropriately immobilized using a customized immobilization device. Preliminary simulation films are obtained and approved by me. The patient is marked and transferred to the CT scanner. Sequential images are obtained and transferred electronically to the treatment planning software. Extensive analysis then occurs. The target volume, including margins for uncertainty, patient movement and occult tumor extension are selected. In addition organs at risk are outlined. Appropriate doses are selected, both for the target, as well as constraints for organs at risk. Inverse treatment planning is performed by the physics staff under my supervision. These are reviewed by the physician and ultimately performed only following approval by the physician and completion of successful quality assurance.

intensitymodulated radiation therapy simulationthe patient receive intensitymodulated radiation therapy order deliver highdose treatment sensitive structures target volume adjacent significant radiosensitive structuresinitially preliminary isocenter set fluoroscopicallybased simulation unit patient appropriately immobilized using customized immobilization device preliminary simulation films obtained approved patient marked transferred ct scanner sequential images obtained transferred electronically treatment planning software extensive analysis occurs target volume including margins uncertainty patient movement occult tumor extension selected addition organs risk outlined appropriate doses selected target well constraints organs risk inverse treatment planning performed physics staff supervision reviewed physician ultimately performed following approval physician completion successful quality assurance

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY SIMULATION,The patient will receive intensity-modulated radiation therapy in order to deliver high-dose treatment to sensitive structures. The target volume is adjacent to significant radiosensitive structures.,Initially, the preliminary isocenter is set on a fluoroscopically-based simulation unit. The patient is appropriately immobilized using a customized immobilization device. Preliminary simulation films are obtained and approved by me. The patient is marked and transferred to the CT scanner. Sequential images are obtained and transferred electronically to the treatment planning software. Extensive analysis then occurs. The target volume, including margins for uncertainty, patient movement and occult tumor extension are selected. In addition organs at risk are outlined. Appropriate doses are selected, both for the target, as well as constraints for organs at risk. Inverse treatment planning is performed by the physics staff under my supervision. These are reviewed by the physician and ultimately performed only following approval by the physician and completion of successful quality assurance. ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Radiology

INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY,Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a complex set of procedures which requires appropriate positioning and immobilization typically with customized immobilization devices. The treatment planning process requires at least 4 hours of physician time. The technology is appropriate in this patient's case due to the fact that the target volume is adjacent to significant radiosensitive structures. Sequential CT scans are obtained and transferred to the treatment planning software. Extensive analysis occurs. The target volumes, including margins for uncertainty, patient movement and occult tumor extension are selected. In addition, organs at risk are outlined. Doses are selected both for targets, as well as for organs at risk. Associated dose constraints are placed. Inverse treatment planning is then performed in conjunction with the physics staff. These are reviewed by the physician and ultimately performed only following approval by the physician. Multiple beam arrangements may be tested for appropriateness and optimal dose delivery in order to maximize the chance of controlling disease, while minimizing exposure to organs at risk. This is performed in hopes of minimizing associated complications. The physician delineates the treatment type, number of fractions and total volume. During the time of treatment, there is extensive physician intervention, monitoring the patient set up and tolerance. In addition, specific QA is performed by the physics staff under the physician's direction.,In view of the above, the special procedure code 77470 is deemed appropriate.

intensitymodulated radiation therapyintensitymodulated radiation therapy complex set procedures requires appropriate positioning immobilization typically customized immobilization devices treatment planning process requires least hours physician time technology appropriate patients case due fact target volume adjacent significant radiosensitive structures sequential ct scans obtained transferred treatment planning software extensive analysis occurs target volumes including margins uncertainty patient movement occult tumor extension selected addition organs risk outlined doses selected targets well organs risk associated dose constraints placed inverse treatment planning performed conjunction physics staff reviewed physician ultimately performed following approval physician multiple beam arrangements may tested appropriateness optimal dose delivery order maximize chance controlling disease minimizing exposure organs risk performed hopes minimizing associated complications physician delineates treatment type number fractions total volume time treatment extensive physician intervention monitoring patient set tolerance addition specific qa performed physics staff physicians directionin view special procedure code deemed appropriate

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY,Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is a complex set of procedures which requires appropriate positioning and immobilization typically with customized immobilization devices. The treatment planning process requires at least 4 hours of physician time. The technology is appropriate in this patient's case due to the fact that the target volume is adjacent to significant radiosensitive structures. Sequential CT scans are obtained and transferred to the treatment planning software. Extensive analysis occurs. The target volumes, including margins for uncertainty, patient movement and occult tumor extension are selected. In addition, organs at risk are outlined. Doses are selected both for targets, as well as for organs at risk. Associated dose constraints are placed. Inverse treatment planning is then performed in conjunction with the physics staff. These are reviewed by the physician and ultimately performed only following approval by the physician. Multiple beam arrangements may be tested for appropriateness and optimal dose delivery in order to maximize the chance of controlling disease, while minimizing exposure to organs at risk. This is performed in hopes of minimizing associated complications. The physician delineates the treatment type, number of fractions and total volume. During the time of treatment, there is extensive physician intervention, monitoring the patient set up and tolerance. In addition, specific QA is performed by the physics staff under the physician's direction.,In view of the above, the special procedure code 77470 is deemed appropriate. ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Radiology

INTERPRETATION: , MRI of the cervical spine without contrast showed normal vertebral body height and alignment with normal cervical cord signal. At C4-C5, there were minimal uncovertebral osteophytes with mild associated right foraminal compromise. At C5-C6, there were minimal diffuse disc bulge and uncovertebral osteophytes with indentation of the anterior thecal sac, but no cord deformity or foraminal compromise. At C6-C7, there was a central disc herniation resulting in mild deformity of the anterior aspect of the cord with patent neuroforamina. MRI of the thoracic spine showed normal vertebral body height and alignment. There was evidence of disc generation, especially anteriorly at the T5-T6 level. There was no significant central canal or foraminal compromise. Thoracic cord normal in signal morphology. MRI of the lumbar spine showed normal vertebral body height and alignment. There is disc desiccation at L4-L5 and L5-S1 with no significant central canal or foraminal stenosis at L1-L2, L2-L3, and L3-L4. There was a right paracentral disc protrusion at L4-L5 narrowing of the right lateral recess. The transversing nerve root on the right was impinged at that level. The right foramen was mildly compromised. There was also a central disc protrusion seen at the L5-S1 level resulting in indentation of the anterior thecal sac and minimal bilateral foraminal compromise.,IMPRESSION: , Overall impression was mild degenerative changes present in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine without high-grade central canal or foraminal narrowing. There was narrowing of the right lateral recess at L4-L5 level and associated impingement of the transversing nerve root at that level by a disc protrusion. This was also seen on a prior study.,

interpretation mri cervical spine without contrast showed normal vertebral body height alignment normal cervical cord signal cc minimal uncovertebral osteophytes mild associated right foraminal compromise cc minimal diffuse disc bulge uncovertebral osteophytes indentation anterior thecal sac cord deformity foraminal compromise cc central disc herniation resulting mild deformity anterior aspect cord patent neuroforamina mri thoracic spine showed normal vertebral body height alignment evidence disc generation especially anteriorly tt level significant central canal foraminal compromise thoracic cord normal signal morphology mri lumbar spine showed normal vertebral body height alignment disc desiccation ls significant central canal foraminal stenosis right paracentral disc protrusion narrowing right lateral recess transversing nerve root right impinged level right foramen mildly compromised also central disc protrusion seen ls level resulting indentation anterior thecal sac minimal bilateral foraminal compromiseimpression overall impression mild degenerative changes present cervical thoracic lumbar spine without highgrade central canal foraminal narrowing narrowing right lateral recess level associated impingement transversing nerve root level disc protrusion also seen prior study

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INTERPRETATION: , MRI of the cervical spine without contrast showed normal vertebral body height and alignment with normal cervical cord signal. At C4-C5, there were minimal uncovertebral osteophytes with mild associated right foraminal compromise. At C5-C6, there were minimal diffuse disc bulge and uncovertebral osteophytes with indentation of the anterior thecal sac, but no cord deformity or foraminal compromise. At C6-C7, there was a central disc herniation resulting in mild deformity of the anterior aspect of the cord with patent neuroforamina. MRI of the thoracic spine showed normal vertebral body height and alignment. There was evidence of disc generation, especially anteriorly at the T5-T6 level. There was no significant central canal or foraminal compromise. Thoracic cord normal in signal morphology. MRI of the lumbar spine showed normal vertebral body height and alignment. There is disc desiccation at L4-L5 and L5-S1 with no significant central canal or foraminal stenosis at L1-L2, L2-L3, and L3-L4. There was a right paracentral disc protrusion at L4-L5 narrowing of the right lateral recess. The transversing nerve root on the right was impinged at that level. The right foramen was mildly compromised. There was also a central disc protrusion seen at the L5-S1 level resulting in indentation of the anterior thecal sac and minimal bilateral foraminal compromise.,IMPRESSION: , Overall impression was mild degenerative changes present in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine without high-grade central canal or foraminal narrowing. There was narrowing of the right lateral recess at L4-L5 level and associated impingement of the transversing nerve root at that level by a disc protrusion. This was also seen on a prior study., ### Response: Neurology, Orthopedic, Radiology

INTERPRETATION:,1. Predominant rhythm is normal sinus rhythm.,2. No supraventricular arrhythmia.,3. Frequent premature ventricular contractions.,4. Trigemini and couplets.,5. No high-grade atrial ventricular block was noted.,6. Diary was not kept.,IMPRESSION:, Frequent premature atrial contractions, couplets, and trigemini.,

interpretation predominant rhythm normal sinus rhythm supraventricular arrhythmia frequent premature ventricular contractions trigemini couplets highgrade atrial ventricular block noted diary keptimpression frequent premature atrial contractions couplets trigemini

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INTERPRETATION:,1. Predominant rhythm is normal sinus rhythm.,2. No supraventricular arrhythmia.,3. Frequent premature ventricular contractions.,4. Trigemini and couplets.,5. No high-grade atrial ventricular block was noted.,6. Diary was not kept.,IMPRESSION:, Frequent premature atrial contractions, couplets, and trigemini., ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

INTERVAL HISTORY:, ABC who is 10 years of age and carries a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, seen in the clinic today for routine follow-up visit. He was accompanied by his adopted mother. He is attending the fourth grade and has not missed significant days for illness. He has a chronic cough that has been slightly increased for the prior 4 days. Sputum is not produced. Sinuses are described as clear. He is an eager eater, eating a regular diet of increased calorie and protein. He also was taking Resource just for kid juice boxes as well as chocolate milkmaid with half-and-half. Belly complaints are denied. He has 2 to 3 bowel movements per day. He does need a flu vaccine.,MEDICATIONS: , Albuterol premix via nebulizer as needed, albuterol MDI 2 puffs b.i.d., therapy Vest daily, Creon 20 two with meals and snacks, A-dec 2 tablets daily, Prevacid 15 mg daily, Advair 100/50 one inhalation twice daily, and MiraLax p.r.n.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:,VITAL SIGNS: Respiratory rate 20 and pulse 91. Temperature is 100.0 per tympanic membrane. Oximetry is 98% on room air. Height is 128 cm, which is an increase of 1.0 cm from prior visit. Weight is 24.5 kg, which is an increase of 500 grams from prior visit.,GENERAL: He is a cooperative school-aged boy in no apparent distress.,HEENT: Tympanic membranes clear, throat with minimal postnasal drip.,CHEST: Significant for 1+ hyperinflation. Lungs are auscultated with good air entry and clear breath sounds.,CARDIAC: Regular sinus rhythm without murmur.,ABDOMEN: Palpated as soft, without hepatosplenomegaly.,EXTREMITIES: Not clubbed.,CHART REVIEW: , This chart was thoroughly reviewed prior to this conference by X, RN, BSN. Review of chart indicates that mother has good adherence to treatment plan indicated by medications being refilled in a timely fashion as well as clinic contact documented with appropriate concerns.,DISCUSSION: PHYSICIAN: , X did note that mother reported that the patient had discontinued the Pulmozyme due to CCS reasons. He is not sure what this would be since CCS Pulmozyme is a covered benefit on CCS for children with cystic fibrosis. This situation will be looked into with the hope of restarting soon. Other than that the patient seems to be doing well. A flu shot was given.,NURSE: , X, RN, BSN, did note that the patient was doing quite well. Reinforcement of current medication regime was supplied. No other needs identified at this time.,RESPIRATORY CARE: , X, RCP, did review appropriate sequencing of medications with the patient and family. Once again, she was concerned the lack of Pulmozyme due to mom stating CCS issues. At this time, they have increased the Vest use to twice daily and are doing 30-minute treatments.,DIETICIAN: , X, RD, CDE, notes that the patient is 89% of his ideal body weight, which is a nutritional failure per cystic fibrosis guidelines. This is despite the fact that he has an excellent appetite. Mom reports he is taking his enzymes consistently as well as vitamins. He does have problems meeting his goal for resource drinks per day. Since the patient has been struggling to gain weight this past year, we will need to monitor his nutritional status and weight trend very closely. A variety of additional high calorie items were discussed with mom.,SOCIAL WORK: , X, LCSW, notes that mom has recently gradually from respiratory therapy school and has accepted a position here at Children's Hospital. The patient is doing well in school. With the exception of issues with CCS authorization, there appears to be no pressing social needs at this time.,IMPRESSION: , ,1. Cystic fibrosis.,2. Poor nutritional status.,PLAN: ,1. Give flu vaccine 0.5 mg IM now, this was done.,2. Continue all other medications and treatment.,3. Evaluate/investigate rationale for no authorization of Pulmozyme with CCS.,4. Needs to augment current high-calorie diet to give more nutrition. To follow advice by a dietician.,5. Continue all the medication treatments before.,6. To continue off and ongoing psychosocial nutritional counseling as necessary.

interval history abc years age carries diagnosis cystic fibrosis seen clinic today routine followup visit accompanied adopted mother attending fourth grade missed significant days illness chronic cough slightly increased prior days sputum produced sinuses described clear eager eater eating regular diet increased calorie protein also taking resource kid juice boxes well chocolate milkmaid halfandhalf belly complaints denied bowel movements per day need flu vaccinemedications albuterol premix via nebulizer needed albuterol mdi puffs bid therapy vest daily creon two meals snacks adec tablets daily prevacid mg daily advair one inhalation twice daily miralax prnphysical examinationvital signs respiratory rate pulse temperature per tympanic membrane oximetry room air height cm increase cm prior visit weight kg increase grams prior visitgeneral cooperative schoolaged boy apparent distressheent tympanic membranes clear throat minimal postnasal dripchest significant hyperinflation lungs auscultated good air entry clear breath soundscardiac regular sinus rhythm without murmurabdomen palpated soft without hepatosplenomegalyextremities clubbedchart review chart thoroughly reviewed prior conference x rn bsn review chart indicates mother good adherence treatment plan indicated medications refilled timely fashion well clinic contact documented appropriate concernsdiscussion physician x note mother reported patient discontinued pulmozyme due ccs reasons sure would since ccs pulmozyme covered benefit ccs children cystic fibrosis situation looked hope restarting soon patient seems well flu shot givennurse x rn bsn note patient quite well reinforcement current medication regime supplied needs identified timerespiratory care x rcp review appropriate sequencing medications patient family concerned lack pulmozyme due mom stating ccs issues time increased vest use twice daily minute treatmentsdietician x rd cde notes patient ideal body weight nutritional failure per cystic fibrosis guidelines despite fact excellent appetite mom reports taking enzymes consistently well vitamins problems meeting goal resource drinks per day since patient struggling gain weight past year need monitor nutritional status weight trend closely variety additional high calorie items discussed momsocial work x lcsw notes mom recently gradually respiratory therapy school accepted position childrens hospital patient well school exception issues ccs authorization appears pressing social needs timeimpression cystic fibrosis poor nutritional statusplan give flu vaccine mg im done continue medications treatment evaluateinvestigate rationale authorization pulmozyme ccs needs augment current highcalorie diet give nutrition follow advice dietician continue medication treatments continue ongoing psychosocial nutritional counseling necessary

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INTERVAL HISTORY:, ABC who is 10 years of age and carries a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, seen in the clinic today for routine follow-up visit. He was accompanied by his adopted mother. He is attending the fourth grade and has not missed significant days for illness. He has a chronic cough that has been slightly increased for the prior 4 days. Sputum is not produced. Sinuses are described as clear. He is an eager eater, eating a regular diet of increased calorie and protein. He also was taking Resource just for kid juice boxes as well as chocolate milkmaid with half-and-half. Belly complaints are denied. He has 2 to 3 bowel movements per day. He does need a flu vaccine.,MEDICATIONS: , Albuterol premix via nebulizer as needed, albuterol MDI 2 puffs b.i.d., therapy Vest daily, Creon 20 two with meals and snacks, A-dec 2 tablets daily, Prevacid 15 mg daily, Advair 100/50 one inhalation twice daily, and MiraLax p.r.n.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:,VITAL SIGNS: Respiratory rate 20 and pulse 91. Temperature is 100.0 per tympanic membrane. Oximetry is 98% on room air. Height is 128 cm, which is an increase of 1.0 cm from prior visit. Weight is 24.5 kg, which is an increase of 500 grams from prior visit.,GENERAL: He is a cooperative school-aged boy in no apparent distress.,HEENT: Tympanic membranes clear, throat with minimal postnasal drip.,CHEST: Significant for 1+ hyperinflation. Lungs are auscultated with good air entry and clear breath sounds.,CARDIAC: Regular sinus rhythm without murmur.,ABDOMEN: Palpated as soft, without hepatosplenomegaly.,EXTREMITIES: Not clubbed.,CHART REVIEW: , This chart was thoroughly reviewed prior to this conference by X, RN, BSN. Review of chart indicates that mother has good adherence to treatment plan indicated by medications being refilled in a timely fashion as well as clinic contact documented with appropriate concerns.,DISCUSSION: PHYSICIAN: , X did note that mother reported that the patient had discontinued the Pulmozyme due to CCS reasons. He is not sure what this would be since CCS Pulmozyme is a covered benefit on CCS for children with cystic fibrosis. This situation will be looked into with the hope of restarting soon. Other than that the patient seems to be doing well. A flu shot was given.,NURSE: , X, RN, BSN, did note that the patient was doing quite well. Reinforcement of current medication regime was supplied. No other needs identified at this time.,RESPIRATORY CARE: , X, RCP, did review appropriate sequencing of medications with the patient and family. Once again, she was concerned the lack of Pulmozyme due to mom stating CCS issues. At this time, they have increased the Vest use to twice daily and are doing 30-minute treatments.,DIETICIAN: , X, RD, CDE, notes that the patient is 89% of his ideal body weight, which is a nutritional failure per cystic fibrosis guidelines. This is despite the fact that he has an excellent appetite. Mom reports he is taking his enzymes consistently as well as vitamins. He does have problems meeting his goal for resource drinks per day. Since the patient has been struggling to gain weight this past year, we will need to monitor his nutritional status and weight trend very closely. A variety of additional high calorie items were discussed with mom.,SOCIAL WORK: , X, LCSW, notes that mom has recently gradually from respiratory therapy school and has accepted a position here at Children's Hospital. The patient is doing well in school. With the exception of issues with CCS authorization, there appears to be no pressing social needs at this time.,IMPRESSION: , ,1. Cystic fibrosis.,2. Poor nutritional status.,PLAN: ,1. Give flu vaccine 0.5 mg IM now, this was done.,2. Continue all other medications and treatment.,3. Evaluate/investigate rationale for no authorization of Pulmozyme with CCS.,4. Needs to augment current high-calorie diet to give more nutrition. To follow advice by a dietician.,5. Continue all the medication treatments before.,6. To continue off and ongoing psychosocial nutritional counseling as necessary. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Consult - History and Phy.

INTRODUCTION: , The opinions expressed in this report are those of the physician. The opinions do not reflect the opinions of Evergreen Medical Panel, Inc. The claimant was informed that this examination was at the request of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). The claimant was also informed that a written report would be sent to L&I, as requested in the assignment letter from the claims manager. The claimant was also informed that the examination was for evaluative purposes only, intended to address specific injuries or conditions as outlined by L&I, and was not intended as a general medical examination.,CHIEF COMPLAINTS: , This 51-year-old married male presents complaining of some right periscapular discomfort, some occasional neck stiffness, and some intermittent discomfort in his low back relative to an industrial fall that occurred on November 20, 2008.,HISTORY OF INDUSTRIAL INJURY:, This patient was injured on November 20, 2008. He works at the Purdy Correctional Facility and an inmate had broken some overhead sprinklers, the floor was thus covered with water and the patient slipped landing on the back of his head, then on his back. The patient said he primarily landed on the left side. After the accident he states that he was generally stun and someone at the institute advised him to be evaluated. He went to a Gig Harbor urgent care facility and they sent him on to Tacoma General Hospital. At the Tacoma General, he indicates that a whiplash and a concussion were diagnosed and it was advised that he have a CT scan. The patient describes that he had a brain CT and a dark spot was found. It was recommended that he have a followup MRI and this was done locally and showed a recurrent acoustic neuroma. Before, when the patient initially had developed an acoustic neuroma, the chiropractor had seen the patient and suggested that he have a scan and this was how his original acoustic neuroma was diagnosed back in October 2005. The patient has been receiving adjustments by the chiropractor since and he also has had a few massage treatments. Overall his spine complaints have improved substantially.,After the fall, he also saw at Prompt Care in the general Bremerton area, XYZ, an Osteopathic Physician and she examined him and released him full duty and also got an orthopedic consult from XYZ. She ordered an MRI of his neck. Cervically this showed that he had a mild disc bulge at C4-C5, but this actually was the same test that diagnosed a recurrent acoustic neuroma and the patient now is just recovering from neurosurgical treatment for this recurrent acoustic neuroma and some radiation is planned.,Since 2002 the patient has been seeing the chiropractor, XYZ for general aches and pain and this has included some treatments on his back and neck.,CURRENT SYMPTOMS: ,The patient describes his current pain as being intermittent.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:,Illnesses: The patient had a diagnosis in 2005 of an acoustic neuroma. It was benign, but treated neurosurgically. In February 2004 and again in August 2009 he has had additional treatments for recurrence and he currently has some skull markers in place because radiation is planned as a followup, although the tumor was still indicated to be benign.,Operations: He has a history of an old mastoidectomy. He has a past history of removal of an acoustic neuroma in 2005 as noted.,Medications: The patient takes occasional Tylenol and occasional Aleve.,Substance Use:,Tobacco: He does not smoke cigarettes.,Alcohol: He drinks about five beers a week.,FAMILY HISTORY:, His father died of mesothelioma and his mother died of Lou Gehrig's disease.,SOCIOECONOMIC HISTORY:,Marital Status and Dependents: The patient has been married three times; longest marriage is of two years duration. He has two children. These dependents are ages 15 and twins and are his wife's dependents.,Education: The patient has bachelor's degree.,Military History: He served six years in the army and received an honorable discharge.,Work History: He has worked at Purdy Correctional Institute in Gig Harbor for 19 years.,CHART REVIEW: , Review of the chart indicates a date of injury of November 20, 2008. He was seen at Tacoma General Hospital with a diagnosis of head contusion and cervical strain. He had a CT of his head done because of a fall with possible loss of consciousness, which showed a left cerebellar hypodensity and further evaluation was recommended. He has a history of an old mastoidectomy. He was then seen on November 24, 2008 by XYZ at Prompt Care on November 24, 2008. There is no clearcut history that he had lost consciousness. He has a past history of removal of an acoustic neuroma in 2005 as noted. A diagnosis of concussion and cervical strain status post fall was made along with an underlying history of abnormal CT and previous resection of an acoustic neuroma. Some symptoms of loss of balance and confusion were noted. She recommended additional testing and neurologic evaluation.,The notes from the treating chiropractor begin on November 24, 2008. Adjustments are given to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine.,He was seen back by XYZ on December 9, 2008 and he had been released to full duties. It was recognized the new MRI suggested recurrence of the acoustic neuroma and he was advised to seek further care in this regard. There were some concerns of his feeling of being wobbly since the fall which might be related to the recurrent neuroma. He continued to have chiropractic adjustments. He was seen back at Prompt Care on January 8, 2009. Dr. X indicated that she thought most of his symptoms were related to the tumor, but that the cervical and thoracic stiffness were from the fall.,A followup note by his chiropractor on January 26, 2009 indicates that cervical x-rays have been taken and that continued chiropractic adjustments along with manual traction would be carried out.,On April 13, 2009, he was seen again at Prompt Care for his cervical and thoracic strain. He was indicated to be improving and there was suggestion that he has some physical therapy and an orthopedic consult was felt appropriate. Therapy was not carried out and obviously was then involved with the treatment of his recurrent neuroma.,On April 17, 2009, he was seen by Dr. X, another chiropractor for consultation and further chiropractic treatments were recommended based on cervical and thoracolumbar subluxation complexes and strain.,A repeat consult was carried out on April 29, 2009 by XYZ. He felt that this was hyperextension cervical injury. It might take a period of time to recover. He mentioned that the patient might have a slight ulnar neuropathy. He felt the patient was capable of full duty and the patient was at that time having ongoing treatment for his neuroma.,This concludes the chart review.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , The patient is 6 feet in height, weighs 255 pounds.,Orthopedic Examination: He can walk with a normal gait, but he has, as indicated, a positive Romberg test and he himself has noticed that if he closes his eyes he loses his balance. Overall the patient is a seemingly good historian. There is a visible 3 cm scar at the left base of the neck near the hairline and there are multiple areas where his head has been shaved both anteriorly and posteriorly. These are secondary to drawing for the skull markers. There is a scar behind the patient's left ear from the original treatment of the acoustic neuroma. This was well healed. The patient can perform a toe-heel gait without difficulty. One visibly can see that he has some facial asymmetry and he indicates that the acoustic neuroma has caused some numbness in the left side of his face and also some asymmetry that is now recovering. The patient states he now thinks his recovery is going to get disregarded and that the facial asymmetry and numbness developed from the first surgery he had. The patient has a full range of motion in both of his shoulders. The patient has a full range of motion in his lumbar spine to include 90 degrees of forward bend, lateral bending of 30 degrees in either direction and extension of 10 degrees. There is full range of motion in the patient's cervical spine to include flexion of 50 degrees at which time he can touch his chin on his chest. He extends 40 degrees, laterally bends 30 degrees, and rotates to 80 degrees in either direction. There is slight tenderness on palpating over the right cervical musculature. There is no evidence of any cervical or lumbar muscle spasms. Reflexes in the upper extremities include 1+ biceps and triceps and 1+ brachioradialis. Knee jerks are 2+ and ankle jerks are 1+. Tinel's test was tested at the elbow, it is negative bilaterally with percussion; however, he has slight tingling bilaterally. The patient's grip tested with a Jamar dynamometer increases from 70 to 80 pounds bilaterally. Sensory testing of lower extremities reveal that the patient has slightly decreased sensation to sharp stimulus in his dorsal aspect of the right first toe and a lesser extent to the left. Testing of muscle strength in the upper and lower extremities is normal. The patient upper arms measured four fingerbreadths above the flexion crease of the elbow measure 35 cm bilaterally. The forearms measured four fingerbreadths below the flexion crease of the elbow measure 30 cm bilaterally. The thighs measured four fingerbreadths above the superior pole of the patella measure 48 cm and the lower legs measured four fingerbreadths below the tibial tubercles measure 41 cm. Pressure on the vertex of the head does not bother the patient. Axial loading is negative. As already indicated straight leg raising is entirely negative both sitting and lying for any radiculitis.,DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES: , X-rays the patient brings with him taken by his treating chiropractor dated 11/24/08 showed that there appears to be a little bit of narrowing of the L4-5 disc space. The hip joints are normal. Views of his thoracic spine are normal. Cervical x-rays are in the file. These are of intermittent quality, but the views do show a very slight degree of anterior spurring at the C4-5 with possible slight narrowing of the disc. There is a view of the right shoulder that is unremarkable.,CONCLUSIONS:, The accepted condition under the claim is a sprain of the neck, thoracic, and lumbar.,DIAGNOSES: , Diagnosis based on today's examination is a sprain of the cervical spine and lumbar spine superimposed upon some early degenerative changes.,Additional diagnosis is one of recurrent acoustic neuroma, presumably benign with upcoming additional treatment of radiation plan. The patient also has a significant degree overweight for his height and it will be improved as he himself recognizes by some weight loss and exercise.,DISCUSSION: , He is fixed and stable at this time and his industrial case can be closed relative to his industrial injury of November 20, 2008. Further chiropractic treatments would be entirely palliative and serve no additional medical purpose due to the fact that he has very minimal symptoms and a basis for these symptoms based on mild or early degenerative changes in both cervical and lumbar spine. He is category I relative to the cervical spine under 296-20-240 and category I to the lumbosacral spine under WAC 296-20-270. His industrial case should be closed and there is, as indicated, no basis for any disability award.

introduction opinions expressed report physician opinions reflect opinions evergreen medical panel inc claimant informed examination request washington state department labor industries li claimant also informed written report would sent li requested assignment letter claims manager claimant also informed examination evaluative purposes intended address specific injuries conditions outlined li intended general medical examinationchief complaints yearold married male presents complaining right periscapular discomfort occasional neck stiffness intermittent discomfort low back relative industrial fall occurred november history industrial injury patient injured november works purdy correctional facility inmate broken overhead sprinklers floor thus covered water patient slipped landing back head back patient said primarily landed left side accident states generally stun someone institute advised evaluated went gig harbor urgent care facility sent tacoma general hospital tacoma general indicates whiplash concussion diagnosed advised ct scan patient describes brain ct dark spot found recommended followup mri done locally showed recurrent acoustic neuroma patient initially developed acoustic neuroma chiropractor seen patient suggested scan original acoustic neuroma diagnosed back october patient receiving adjustments chiropractor since also massage treatments overall spine complaints improved substantiallyafter fall also saw prompt care general bremerton area xyz osteopathic physician examined released full duty also got orthopedic consult xyz ordered mri neck cervically showed mild disc bulge cc actually test diagnosed recurrent acoustic neuroma patient recovering neurosurgical treatment recurrent acoustic neuroma radiation plannedsince patient seeing chiropractor xyz general aches pain included treatments back neckcurrent symptoms patient describes current pain intermittentpast medical historyillnesses patient diagnosis acoustic neuroma benign treated neurosurgically february august additional treatments recurrence currently skull markers place radiation planned followup although tumor still indicated benignoperations history old mastoidectomy past history removal acoustic neuroma notedmedications patient takes occasional tylenol occasional alevesubstance usetobacco smoke cigarettesalcohol drinks five beers weekfamily history father died mesothelioma mother died lou gehrigs diseasesocioeconomic historymarital status dependents patient married three times longest marriage two years duration two children dependents ages twins wifes dependentseducation patient bachelors degreemilitary history served six years army received honorable dischargework history worked purdy correctional institute gig harbor yearschart review review chart indicates date injury november seen tacoma general hospital diagnosis head contusion cervical strain ct head done fall possible loss consciousness showed left cerebellar hypodensity evaluation recommended history old mastoidectomy seen november xyz prompt care november clearcut history lost consciousness past history removal acoustic neuroma noted diagnosis concussion cervical strain status post fall made along underlying history abnormal ct previous resection acoustic neuroma symptoms loss balance confusion noted recommended additional testing neurologic evaluationthe notes treating chiropractor begin november adjustments given cervical thoracic lumbar spinehe seen back xyz december released full duties recognized new mri suggested recurrence acoustic neuroma advised seek care regard concerns feeling wobbly since fall might related recurrent neuroma continued chiropractic adjustments seen back prompt care january dr x indicated thought symptoms related tumor cervical thoracic stiffness falla followup note chiropractor january indicates cervical xrays taken continued chiropractic adjustments along manual traction would carried outon april seen prompt care cervical thoracic strain indicated improving suggestion physical therapy orthopedic consult felt appropriate therapy carried obviously involved treatment recurrent neuromaon april seen dr x another chiropractor consultation chiropractic treatments recommended based cervical thoracolumbar subluxation complexes straina repeat consult carried april xyz felt hyperextension cervical injury might take period time recover mentioned patient might slight ulnar neuropathy felt patient capable full duty patient time ongoing treatment neuromathis concludes chart reviewphysical examination patient feet height weighs poundsorthopedic examination walk normal gait indicated positive romberg test noticed closes eyes loses balance overall patient seemingly good historian visible cm scar left base neck near hairline multiple areas head shaved anteriorly posteriorly secondary drawing skull markers scar behind patients left ear original treatment acoustic neuroma well healed patient perform toeheel gait without difficulty one visibly see facial asymmetry indicates acoustic neuroma caused numbness left side face also asymmetry recovering patient states thinks recovery going get disregarded facial asymmetry numbness developed first surgery patient full range motion shoulders patient full range motion lumbar spine include degrees forward bend lateral bending degrees either direction extension degrees full range motion patients cervical spine include flexion degrees time touch chin chest extends degrees laterally bends degrees rotates degrees either direction slight tenderness palpating right cervical musculature evidence cervical lumbar muscle spasms reflexes upper extremities include biceps triceps brachioradialis knee jerks ankle jerks tinels test tested elbow negative bilaterally percussion however slight tingling bilaterally patients grip tested jamar dynamometer increases pounds bilaterally sensory testing lower extremities reveal patient slightly decreased sensation sharp stimulus dorsal aspect right first toe lesser extent left testing muscle strength upper lower extremities normal patient upper arms measured four fingerbreadths flexion crease elbow measure cm bilaterally forearms measured four fingerbreadths flexion crease elbow measure cm bilaterally thighs measured four fingerbreadths superior pole patella measure cm lower legs measured four fingerbreadths tibial tubercles measure cm pressure vertex head bother patient axial loading negative already indicated straight leg raising entirely negative sitting lying radiculitisdiagnostic studies xrays patient brings taken treating chiropractor dated showed appears little bit narrowing l disc space hip joints normal views thoracic spine normal cervical xrays file intermittent quality views show slight degree anterior spurring c possible slight narrowing disc view right shoulder unremarkableconclusions accepted condition claim sprain neck thoracic lumbardiagnoses diagnosis based todays examination sprain cervical spine lumbar spine superimposed upon early degenerative changesadditional diagnosis one recurrent acoustic neuroma presumably benign upcoming additional treatment radiation plan patient also significant degree overweight height improved recognizes weight loss exercisediscussion fixed stable time industrial case closed relative industrial injury november chiropractic treatments would entirely palliative serve additional medical purpose due fact minimal symptoms basis symptoms based mild early degenerative changes cervical lumbar spine category relative cervical spine category lumbosacral spine wac industrial case closed indicated basis disability award

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: INTRODUCTION: , The opinions expressed in this report are those of the physician. The opinions do not reflect the opinions of Evergreen Medical Panel, Inc. The claimant was informed that this examination was at the request of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). The claimant was also informed that a written report would be sent to L&I, as requested in the assignment letter from the claims manager. The claimant was also informed that the examination was for evaluative purposes only, intended to address specific injuries or conditions as outlined by L&I, and was not intended as a general medical examination.,CHIEF COMPLAINTS: , This 51-year-old married male presents complaining of some right periscapular discomfort, some occasional neck stiffness, and some intermittent discomfort in his low back relative to an industrial fall that occurred on November 20, 2008.,HISTORY OF INDUSTRIAL INJURY:, This patient was injured on November 20, 2008. He works at the Purdy Correctional Facility and an inmate had broken some overhead sprinklers, the floor was thus covered with water and the patient slipped landing on the back of his head, then on his back. The patient said he primarily landed on the left side. After the accident he states that he was generally stun and someone at the institute advised him to be evaluated. He went to a Gig Harbor urgent care facility and they sent him on to Tacoma General Hospital. At the Tacoma General, he indicates that a whiplash and a concussion were diagnosed and it was advised that he have a CT scan. The patient describes that he had a brain CT and a dark spot was found. It was recommended that he have a followup MRI and this was done locally and showed a recurrent acoustic neuroma. Before, when the patient initially had developed an acoustic neuroma, the chiropractor had seen the patient and suggested that he have a scan and this was how his original acoustic neuroma was diagnosed back in October 2005. The patient has been receiving adjustments by the chiropractor since and he also has had a few massage treatments. Overall his spine complaints have improved substantially.,After the fall, he also saw at Prompt Care in the general Bremerton area, XYZ, an Osteopathic Physician and she examined him and released him full duty and also got an orthopedic consult from XYZ. She ordered an MRI of his neck. Cervically this showed that he had a mild disc bulge at C4-C5, but this actually was the same test that diagnosed a recurrent acoustic neuroma and the patient now is just recovering from neurosurgical treatment for this recurrent acoustic neuroma and some radiation is planned.,Since 2002 the patient has been seeing the chiropractor, XYZ for general aches and pain and this has included some treatments on his back and neck.,CURRENT SYMPTOMS: ,The patient describes his current pain as being intermittent.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:,Illnesses: The patient had a diagnosis in 2005 of an acoustic neuroma. It was benign, but treated neurosurgically. In February 2004 and again in August 2009 he has had additional treatments for recurrence and he currently has some skull markers in place because radiation is planned as a followup, although the tumor was still indicated to be benign.,Operations: He has a history of an old mastoidectomy. He has a past history of removal of an acoustic neuroma in 2005 as noted.,Medications: The patient takes occasional Tylenol and occasional Aleve.,Substance Use:,Tobacco: He does not smoke cigarettes.,Alcohol: He drinks about five beers a week.,FAMILY HISTORY:, His father died of mesothelioma and his mother died of Lou Gehrig's disease.,SOCIOECONOMIC HISTORY:,Marital Status and Dependents: The patient has been married three times; longest marriage is of two years duration. He has two children. These dependents are ages 15 and twins and are his wife's dependents.,Education: The patient has bachelor's degree.,Military History: He served six years in the army and received an honorable discharge.,Work History: He has worked at Purdy Correctional Institute in Gig Harbor for 19 years.,CHART REVIEW: , Review of the chart indicates a date of injury of November 20, 2008. He was seen at Tacoma General Hospital with a diagnosis of head contusion and cervical strain. He had a CT of his head done because of a fall with possible loss of consciousness, which showed a left cerebellar hypodensity and further evaluation was recommended. He has a history of an old mastoidectomy. He was then seen on November 24, 2008 by XYZ at Prompt Care on November 24, 2008. There is no clearcut history that he had lost consciousness. He has a past history of removal of an acoustic neuroma in 2005 as noted. A diagnosis of concussion and cervical strain status post fall was made along with an underlying history of abnormal CT and previous resection of an acoustic neuroma. Some symptoms of loss of balance and confusion were noted. She recommended additional testing and neurologic evaluation.,The notes from the treating chiropractor begin on November 24, 2008. Adjustments are given to the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine.,He was seen back by XYZ on December 9, 2008 and he had been released to full duties. It was recognized the new MRI suggested recurrence of the acoustic neuroma and he was advised to seek further care in this regard. There were some concerns of his feeling of being wobbly since the fall which might be related to the recurrent neuroma. He continued to have chiropractic adjustments. He was seen back at Prompt Care on January 8, 2009. Dr. X indicated that she thought most of his symptoms were related to the tumor, but that the cervical and thoracic stiffness were from the fall.,A followup note by his chiropractor on January 26, 2009 indicates that cervical x-rays have been taken and that continued chiropractic adjustments along with manual traction would be carried out.,On April 13, 2009, he was seen again at Prompt Care for his cervical and thoracic strain. He was indicated to be improving and there was suggestion that he has some physical therapy and an orthopedic consult was felt appropriate. Therapy was not carried out and obviously was then involved with the treatment of his recurrent neuroma.,On April 17, 2009, he was seen by Dr. X, another chiropractor for consultation and further chiropractic treatments were recommended based on cervical and thoracolumbar subluxation complexes and strain.,A repeat consult was carried out on April 29, 2009 by XYZ. He felt that this was hyperextension cervical injury. It might take a period of time to recover. He mentioned that the patient might have a slight ulnar neuropathy. He felt the patient was capable of full duty and the patient was at that time having ongoing treatment for his neuroma.,This concludes the chart review.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , The patient is 6 feet in height, weighs 255 pounds.,Orthopedic Examination: He can walk with a normal gait, but he has, as indicated, a positive Romberg test and he himself has noticed that if he closes his eyes he loses his balance. Overall the patient is a seemingly good historian. There is a visible 3 cm scar at the left base of the neck near the hairline and there are multiple areas where his head has been shaved both anteriorly and posteriorly. These are secondary to drawing for the skull markers. There is a scar behind the patient's left ear from the original treatment of the acoustic neuroma. This was well healed. The patient can perform a toe-heel gait without difficulty. One visibly can see that he has some facial asymmetry and he indicates that the acoustic neuroma has caused some numbness in the left side of his face and also some asymmetry that is now recovering. The patient states he now thinks his recovery is going to get disregarded and that the facial asymmetry and numbness developed from the first surgery he had. The patient has a full range of motion in both of his shoulders. The patient has a full range of motion in his lumbar spine to include 90 degrees of forward bend, lateral bending of 30 degrees in either direction and extension of 10 degrees. There is full range of motion in the patient's cervical spine to include flexion of 50 degrees at which time he can touch his chin on his chest. He extends 40 degrees, laterally bends 30 degrees, and rotates to 80 degrees in either direction. There is slight tenderness on palpating over the right cervical musculature. There is no evidence of any cervical or lumbar muscle spasms. Reflexes in the upper extremities include 1+ biceps and triceps and 1+ brachioradialis. Knee jerks are 2+ and ankle jerks are 1+. Tinel's test was tested at the elbow, it is negative bilaterally with percussion; however, he has slight tingling bilaterally. The patient's grip tested with a Jamar dynamometer increases from 70 to 80 pounds bilaterally. Sensory testing of lower extremities reveal that the patient has slightly decreased sensation to sharp stimulus in his dorsal aspect of the right first toe and a lesser extent to the left. Testing of muscle strength in the upper and lower extremities is normal. The patient upper arms measured four fingerbreadths above the flexion crease of the elbow measure 35 cm bilaterally. The forearms measured four fingerbreadths below the flexion crease of the elbow measure 30 cm bilaterally. The thighs measured four fingerbreadths above the superior pole of the patella measure 48 cm and the lower legs measured four fingerbreadths below the tibial tubercles measure 41 cm. Pressure on the vertex of the head does not bother the patient. Axial loading is negative. As already indicated straight leg raising is entirely negative both sitting and lying for any radiculitis.,DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES: , X-rays the patient brings with him taken by his treating chiropractor dated 11/24/08 showed that there appears to be a little bit of narrowing of the L4-5 disc space. The hip joints are normal. Views of his thoracic spine are normal. Cervical x-rays are in the file. These are of intermittent quality, but the views do show a very slight degree of anterior spurring at the C4-5 with possible slight narrowing of the disc. There is a view of the right shoulder that is unremarkable.,CONCLUSIONS:, The accepted condition under the claim is a sprain of the neck, thoracic, and lumbar.,DIAGNOSES: , Diagnosis based on today's examination is a sprain of the cervical spine and lumbar spine superimposed upon some early degenerative changes.,Additional diagnosis is one of recurrent acoustic neuroma, presumably benign with upcoming additional treatment of radiation plan. The patient also has a significant degree overweight for his height and it will be improved as he himself recognizes by some weight loss and exercise.,DISCUSSION: , He is fixed and stable at this time and his industrial case can be closed relative to his industrial injury of November 20, 2008. Further chiropractic treatments would be entirely palliative and serve no additional medical purpose due to the fact that he has very minimal symptoms and a basis for these symptoms based on mild or early degenerative changes in both cervical and lumbar spine. He is category I relative to the cervical spine under 296-20-240 and category I to the lumbosacral spine under WAC 296-20-270. His industrial case should be closed and there is, as indicated, no basis for any disability award. ### Response: Orthopedic

Informed written consent has been obtained from the patient. I explained the procedure to her prior to initiation of such. The appropriate time-out procedure as per Medical Center protocol was performed prior to the procedure being begun while the patient was actively participating with appropriate identification of the patient, procedure, physician, documentation, position. There were no safety concerns noted by staff nor myself.,REST ECHO:, EF 60%. No wall motion abnormalities. EKG shows normal sinus rhythm with mild ST depressions. The patient exercised for 7 minutes 30 seconds on a standard Bruce protocol, exceeding target heart rate; no angina nor significant ECG changes seen. Peak stress echo imaging shows EF of 75%, no regional wall motion abnormalities. There was resting hypertension noted, systolic of approximately 152 mmHg with appropriate response of blood pressure to exercise. No dysrhythmias noted.,IMPRESSION:,1. Negative exercise ECG/echocardiogram stress evaluation for inducible ischemia in excess of target heart rate.,2. Resting hypertension with appropriate response of blood pressure to exercise.,These results have been discussed with the patient. Other management as per the hospital-based internal medicine service.,To be clear, there were no complications of this procedure.

informed written consent obtained patient explained procedure prior initiation appropriate timeout procedure per medical center protocol performed prior procedure begun patient actively participating appropriate identification patient procedure physician documentation position safety concerns noted staff myselfrest echo ef wall motion abnormalities ekg shows normal sinus rhythm mild st depressions patient exercised minutes seconds standard bruce protocol exceeding target heart rate angina significant ecg changes seen peak stress echo imaging shows ef regional wall motion abnormalities resting hypertension noted systolic approximately mmhg appropriate response blood pressure exercise dysrhythmias notedimpression negative exercise ecgechocardiogram stress evaluation inducible ischemia excess target heart rate resting hypertension appropriate response blood pressure exercisethese results discussed patient management per hospitalbased internal medicine serviceto clear complications procedure

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: Informed written consent has been obtained from the patient. I explained the procedure to her prior to initiation of such. The appropriate time-out procedure as per Medical Center protocol was performed prior to the procedure being begun while the patient was actively participating with appropriate identification of the patient, procedure, physician, documentation, position. There were no safety concerns noted by staff nor myself.,REST ECHO:, EF 60%. No wall motion abnormalities. EKG shows normal sinus rhythm with mild ST depressions. The patient exercised for 7 minutes 30 seconds on a standard Bruce protocol, exceeding target heart rate; no angina nor significant ECG changes seen. Peak stress echo imaging shows EF of 75%, no regional wall motion abnormalities. There was resting hypertension noted, systolic of approximately 152 mmHg with appropriate response of blood pressure to exercise. No dysrhythmias noted.,IMPRESSION:,1. Negative exercise ECG/echocardiogram stress evaluation for inducible ischemia in excess of target heart rate.,2. Resting hypertension with appropriate response of blood pressure to exercise.,These results have been discussed with the patient. Other management as per the hospital-based internal medicine service.,To be clear, there were no complications of this procedure. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

Initially a small incision was made in the right superior hemiscrotum and the incision was carried down to the vas deferens. This incision was carried down to the area of the previous vasectomy. A towel clip was placed around this. Next the scarred area was dissected free back to normal vas proximally and distally. Approximately 4 cm of vas was freed up. Next the vas was amputated above and below the scar tissue. Fine hemostats were used to grasp the adventitial tissue on each side of the vas, both the proximal and distal ends. Both ends were then dilated very carefully with lacrimal duct probes up to a #2 successfully. After accomplishing this, fluid could be milked from the proximal vas which was encouraging.,Next the reanastomosis was performed. Three 7-0 Prolene were used and full thickness bites were taken through the muscle layer of the vas deferens and into the lumen. This was all done with 3.5 loupe magnification. Next the vas ends were pulled together by tying the sutures. A good reapproximation was noted. Next in between each of these sutures two to three of the 7-0 Prolenes were used to reapproximate the muscularis layer further in an attempt to make this fluid-tight.,There was no tension on the anastomosis and the vas was delivered back into the right hemiscrotum. The subcuticular layers were closed with a running 3-0 chromic and the skin was closed with three interrupted 3-0 chromic sutures.,Next an identical procedure was done on the left side.,The patient tolerated the procedure well and was awakened and returned to the recovery room in stable condition. Antibiotic ointment, fluffs, and a scrotal support were placed.

initially small incision made right superior hemiscrotum incision carried vas deferens incision carried area previous vasectomy towel clip placed around next scarred area dissected free back normal vas proximally distally approximately cm vas freed next vas amputated scar tissue fine hemostats used grasp adventitial tissue side vas proximal distal ends ends dilated carefully lacrimal duct probes successfully accomplishing fluid could milked proximal vas encouragingnext reanastomosis performed three prolene used full thickness bites taken muscle layer vas deferens lumen done loupe magnification next vas ends pulled together tying sutures good reapproximation noted next sutures two three prolenes used reapproximate muscularis layer attempt make fluidtightthere tension anastomosis vas delivered back right hemiscrotum subcuticular layers closed running chromic skin closed three interrupted chromic suturesnext identical procedure done left sidethe patient tolerated procedure well awakened returned recovery room stable condition antibiotic ointment fluffs scrotal support placed

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: Initially a small incision was made in the right superior hemiscrotum and the incision was carried down to the vas deferens. This incision was carried down to the area of the previous vasectomy. A towel clip was placed around this. Next the scarred area was dissected free back to normal vas proximally and distally. Approximately 4 cm of vas was freed up. Next the vas was amputated above and below the scar tissue. Fine hemostats were used to grasp the adventitial tissue on each side of the vas, both the proximal and distal ends. Both ends were then dilated very carefully with lacrimal duct probes up to a #2 successfully. After accomplishing this, fluid could be milked from the proximal vas which was encouraging.,Next the reanastomosis was performed. Three 7-0 Prolene were used and full thickness bites were taken through the muscle layer of the vas deferens and into the lumen. This was all done with 3.5 loupe magnification. Next the vas ends were pulled together by tying the sutures. A good reapproximation was noted. Next in between each of these sutures two to three of the 7-0 Prolenes were used to reapproximate the muscularis layer further in an attempt to make this fluid-tight.,There was no tension on the anastomosis and the vas was delivered back into the right hemiscrotum. The subcuticular layers were closed with a running 3-0 chromic and the skin was closed with three interrupted 3-0 chromic sutures.,Next an identical procedure was done on the left side.,The patient tolerated the procedure well and was awakened and returned to the recovery room in stable condition. Antibiotic ointment, fluffs, and a scrotal support were placed. ### Response: Surgery, Urology

LEFT LOWER EXTREMITY VENOUS DOPPLER ULTRASOUND,REASON FOR EXAM: , Status post delivery five weeks ago presenting with left calf pain.,INTERPRETATIONS: , There was normal flow, compression and augmentation within the right common femoral, superficial femoral and popliteal veins. Lymph nodes within the left inguinal region measure up to 1 cm in short-axis.,IMPRESSION: , Lymph nodes within the left inguinal region measure up to 1 cm in short-axis, otherwise no evidence for left lower extremity venous thrombosis.

left lower extremity venous doppler ultrasoundreason exam status post delivery five weeks ago presenting left calf paininterpretations normal flow compression augmentation within right common femoral superficial femoral popliteal veins lymph nodes within left inguinal region measure cm shortaxisimpression lymph nodes within left inguinal region measure cm shortaxis otherwise evidence left lower extremity venous thrombosis

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: LEFT LOWER EXTREMITY VENOUS DOPPLER ULTRASOUND,REASON FOR EXAM: , Status post delivery five weeks ago presenting with left calf pain.,INTERPRETATIONS: , There was normal flow, compression and augmentation within the right common femoral, superficial femoral and popliteal veins. Lymph nodes within the left inguinal region measure up to 1 cm in short-axis.,IMPRESSION: , Lymph nodes within the left inguinal region measure up to 1 cm in short-axis, otherwise no evidence for left lower extremity venous thrombosis. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

LEXISCAN MYOVIEW STRESS STUDY,REASON FOR THE EXAM: , Chest discomfort.,INTERPRETATION: , The patient exercised according to the Lexiscan study, received a total of 0.4 mg of Lexiscan IV injection. At peak hyperemic effect, 24.9 mCi of Myoview were injected for the stress imaging and earlier 8.2 mCi were injected for the resting and the usual SPECT and gated SPECT protocol was followed and the data was analyzed using Cedars-Sinai software. The patient did not walk because of prior history of inability to exercise long enough on treadmill.,The resting heart rate was 57 with the resting blood pressure 143/94. Maximum heart rate achieved was 90 with a maximum blood pressure unchanged.,EKG at rest showed sinus rhythm with no significant ST-T wave changes of reversible ischemia or injury. Subtle nonspecific in III and aVF were seen. Maximum stress test EKG showed inverted T wave from V4 to V6. Normal response to Lexiscan.,CONCLUSION: ,Maximal Lexiscan perfusion with subtle abnormalities non-conclusive. Please refer to the Myoview interpretation.,MYOVIEW INTERPRETATION: , The left ventricle appeared to be normal in size on both stress and rest with no change between the stress and rest with left ventricular end-diastolic volume of 115 and end-systolic of 51. EF estimated and calculated at 56%.,Cardiac perfusion reviewed, showed no reversible defect indicative of myocardium risk and no fixed defect indicative of myocardial scarring.,IMPRESSION:,1. Normal stress/rest cardiac perfusion with no indication of ischemia.,2. Normal LV function and low likelihood of significant epicardial coronary narrowing.,

lexiscan myoview stress studyreason exam chest discomfortinterpretation patient exercised according lexiscan study received total mg lexiscan iv injection peak hyperemic effect mci myoview injected stress imaging earlier mci injected resting usual spect gated spect protocol followed data analyzed using cedarssinai software patient walk prior history inability exercise long enough treadmillthe resting heart rate resting blood pressure maximum heart rate achieved maximum blood pressure unchangedekg rest showed sinus rhythm significant stt wave changes reversible ischemia injury subtle nonspecific iii avf seen maximum stress test ekg showed inverted wave v v normal response lexiscanconclusion maximal lexiscan perfusion subtle abnormalities nonconclusive please refer myoview interpretationmyoview interpretation left ventricle appeared normal size stress rest change stress rest left ventricular enddiastolic volume endsystolic ef estimated calculated cardiac perfusion reviewed showed reversible defect indicative myocardium risk fixed defect indicative myocardial scarringimpression normal stressrest cardiac perfusion indication ischemia normal lv function low likelihood significant epicardial coronary narrowing

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: LEXISCAN MYOVIEW STRESS STUDY,REASON FOR THE EXAM: , Chest discomfort.,INTERPRETATION: , The patient exercised according to the Lexiscan study, received a total of 0.4 mg of Lexiscan IV injection. At peak hyperemic effect, 24.9 mCi of Myoview were injected for the stress imaging and earlier 8.2 mCi were injected for the resting and the usual SPECT and gated SPECT protocol was followed and the data was analyzed using Cedars-Sinai software. The patient did not walk because of prior history of inability to exercise long enough on treadmill.,The resting heart rate was 57 with the resting blood pressure 143/94. Maximum heart rate achieved was 90 with a maximum blood pressure unchanged.,EKG at rest showed sinus rhythm with no significant ST-T wave changes of reversible ischemia or injury. Subtle nonspecific in III and aVF were seen. Maximum stress test EKG showed inverted T wave from V4 to V6. Normal response to Lexiscan.,CONCLUSION: ,Maximal Lexiscan perfusion with subtle abnormalities non-conclusive. Please refer to the Myoview interpretation.,MYOVIEW INTERPRETATION: , The left ventricle appeared to be normal in size on both stress and rest with no change between the stress and rest with left ventricular end-diastolic volume of 115 and end-systolic of 51. EF estimated and calculated at 56%.,Cardiac perfusion reviewed, showed no reversible defect indicative of myocardium risk and no fixed defect indicative of myocardial scarring.,IMPRESSION:,1. Normal stress/rest cardiac perfusion with no indication of ischemia.,2. Normal LV function and low likelihood of significant epicardial coronary narrowing., ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

LONG-TERM GOALS:, Both functional and cognitive-linguistic ability to improve safety and independence at home and in the community. This goal has been met based on the patient and husband reports the patient is able to complete all activities, which she desires to do at home. During the last reevaluation, the patient had a significant progress and all cognitive domains evaluated, which are attention, memory, executive functions, language, and visuospatial skill. She continues to have an overall mild cognitive-linguistic deficit, but this is significantly improved from her initial evaluation, which showed severe impairment., ,The patient does no longer need a skilled speech therapy because she has accomplished all of her goals and her progress has plateaued. The patient and her husband both agreed with the patient's discharge.

longterm goals functional cognitivelinguistic ability improve safety independence home community goal met based patient husband reports patient able complete activities desires home last reevaluation patient significant progress cognitive domains evaluated attention memory executive functions language visuospatial skill continues overall mild cognitivelinguistic deficit significantly improved initial evaluation showed severe impairment patient longer need skilled speech therapy accomplished goals progress plateaued patient husband agreed patients discharge

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: LONG-TERM GOALS:, Both functional and cognitive-linguistic ability to improve safety and independence at home and in the community. This goal has been met based on the patient and husband reports the patient is able to complete all activities, which she desires to do at home. During the last reevaluation, the patient had a significant progress and all cognitive domains evaluated, which are attention, memory, executive functions, language, and visuospatial skill. She continues to have an overall mild cognitive-linguistic deficit, but this is significantly improved from her initial evaluation, which showed severe impairment., ,The patient does no longer need a skilled speech therapy because she has accomplished all of her goals and her progress has plateaued. The patient and her husband both agreed with the patient's discharge. ### Response: Discharge Summary

MALE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION,Eye: Eyelids normal color, no edema. Conjunctivae with no erythema, foreign body, or lacerations. Sclerae normal white color, no jaundice. Cornea clear without lesions. Pupils equally responsive to light. Iris normal color, no lesions. Anterior chamber clear. Lacrimal ducts normal. Fundi clear.,Ear: External ear has no erythema, edema, or lesions. Ear canal unobstructed without edema, discharge, or lesions. Tympanic membranes clear with normal light reflex. No middle ear effusions.,Nose: External nose symmetrical. No skin lesions. Nares open and free of lesions. Turbinates normal color, size and shape. Mucus clear. No internal lesions.,Throat: No erythema or exudates. Buccal mucosa clear. Lips normal color without lesions. Tongue normal shape and color without lesion. Hard and soft palate normal color without lesions. Teeth show no remarkable features. No adenopathy. Tonsils normal shape and size. Uvula normal shape and color.,Neck: Skin has no lesions. Neck symmetrical. No adenopathy, thyromegaly, or masses. Normal range of motion, nontender. Trachea midline.,Chest: Symmetrical. Clear to auscultation bilaterally. No wheezing, rales or rhonchi. Chest nontender. Normal lung excursion. No accessory muscle use.,Cardiovascular: Heart has regular rate and rhythm with no S3 or S4. Heart rate is normal.,Abdominal: Soft, nontender, nondistended, bowel sounds present. No hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, masses, or bruits.,Genital: Penis normal shape without lesions. Testicles normal shape and contour without tenderness. Epididymides normal shape and contour without tenderness. Rectum normal tone to sphincter. Prostate normal shape and contour without nodules. Stool hemoccult negative. No external hemorrhoids. No skin lesions.,Musculoskeletal: Normal strength all muscle groups. Normal range of motion all joints. No joint effusions. Joints normal shape and contour. No muscle masses.,Foot: No erythema. No edema. Normal range of motion all joints in the foot. Nontender. No pain with inversion, eversion, plantar or dorsiflexion.,Ankle: Anterior and posterior drawer test negative. No pain with inversion, eversion, dorsiflexion, or plantar flexion. Collateral ligaments intact. No joint effusion, erythema, edema, crepitus, ecchymosis, or tenderness.,Knee: Normal range of motion. No joint effusion, erythema, nontender. Anterior and posterior drawer tests negative. Lachman's test negative. Collateral ligaments intact. Bursas nontender without edema.,Wrist: Normal range of motion. No edema or effusion, nontender. Negative Tinel and Phalen tests. Normal strength all muscle groups.,Elbow: Normal range of motion. No joint effusion or erythema. Normal strength all muscle groups. Nontender. Olecranon bursa flat and nontender, no edema. Normal supination and pronation of forearm. No crepitus.,Hip: Negative swinging test. Trochanteric bursa nontender. Normal range of motion. Normal strength all muscle groups. No pain with eversion and inversion. No crepitus. Normal gait.,Psychiatric: Alert and oriented times four. No delusions or hallucinations, no loose associations, no flight of ideas, no tangentiality. Affect is appropriate. No psychomotor slowing or agitation. Eye contact is appropriate.

male physical examinationeye eyelids normal color edema conjunctivae erythema foreign body lacerations sclerae normal white color jaundice cornea clear without lesions pupils equally responsive light iris normal color lesions anterior chamber clear lacrimal ducts normal fundi clearear external ear erythema edema lesions ear canal unobstructed without edema discharge lesions tympanic membranes clear normal light reflex middle ear effusionsnose external nose symmetrical skin lesions nares open free lesions turbinates normal color size shape mucus clear internal lesionsthroat erythema exudates buccal mucosa clear lips normal color without lesions tongue normal shape color without lesion hard soft palate normal color without lesions teeth show remarkable features adenopathy tonsils normal shape size uvula normal shape colorneck skin lesions neck symmetrical adenopathy thyromegaly masses normal range motion nontender trachea midlinechest symmetrical clear auscultation bilaterally wheezing rales rhonchi chest nontender normal lung excursion accessory muscle usecardiovascular heart regular rate rhythm heart rate normalabdominal soft nontender nondistended bowel sounds present hepatomegaly splenomegaly masses bruitsgenital penis normal shape without lesions testicles normal shape contour without tenderness epididymides normal shape contour without tenderness rectum normal tone sphincter prostate normal shape contour without nodules stool hemoccult negative external hemorrhoids skin lesionsmusculoskeletal normal strength muscle groups normal range motion joints joint effusions joints normal shape contour muscle massesfoot erythema edema normal range motion joints foot nontender pain inversion eversion plantar dorsiflexionankle anterior posterior drawer test negative pain inversion eversion dorsiflexion plantar flexion collateral ligaments intact joint effusion erythema edema crepitus ecchymosis tendernessknee normal range motion joint effusion erythema nontender anterior posterior drawer tests negative lachmans test negative collateral ligaments intact bursas nontender without edemawrist normal range motion edema effusion nontender negative tinel phalen tests normal strength muscle groupselbow normal range motion joint effusion erythema normal strength muscle groups nontender olecranon bursa flat nontender edema normal supination pronation forearm crepituship negative swinging test trochanteric bursa nontender normal range motion normal strength muscle groups pain eversion inversion crepitus normal gaitpsychiatric alert oriented times four delusions hallucinations loose associations flight ideas tangentiality affect appropriate psychomotor slowing agitation eye contact appropriate

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MALE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION,Eye: Eyelids normal color, no edema. Conjunctivae with no erythema, foreign body, or lacerations. Sclerae normal white color, no jaundice. Cornea clear without lesions. Pupils equally responsive to light. Iris normal color, no lesions. Anterior chamber clear. Lacrimal ducts normal. Fundi clear.,Ear: External ear has no erythema, edema, or lesions. Ear canal unobstructed without edema, discharge, or lesions. Tympanic membranes clear with normal light reflex. No middle ear effusions.,Nose: External nose symmetrical. No skin lesions. Nares open and free of lesions. Turbinates normal color, size and shape. Mucus clear. No internal lesions.,Throat: No erythema or exudates. Buccal mucosa clear. Lips normal color without lesions. Tongue normal shape and color without lesion. Hard and soft palate normal color without lesions. Teeth show no remarkable features. No adenopathy. Tonsils normal shape and size. Uvula normal shape and color.,Neck: Skin has no lesions. Neck symmetrical. No adenopathy, thyromegaly, or masses. Normal range of motion, nontender. Trachea midline.,Chest: Symmetrical. Clear to auscultation bilaterally. No wheezing, rales or rhonchi. Chest nontender. Normal lung excursion. No accessory muscle use.,Cardiovascular: Heart has regular rate and rhythm with no S3 or S4. Heart rate is normal.,Abdominal: Soft, nontender, nondistended, bowel sounds present. No hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, masses, or bruits.,Genital: Penis normal shape without lesions. Testicles normal shape and contour without tenderness. Epididymides normal shape and contour without tenderness. Rectum normal tone to sphincter. Prostate normal shape and contour without nodules. Stool hemoccult negative. No external hemorrhoids. No skin lesions.,Musculoskeletal: Normal strength all muscle groups. Normal range of motion all joints. No joint effusions. Joints normal shape and contour. No muscle masses.,Foot: No erythema. No edema. Normal range of motion all joints in the foot. Nontender. No pain with inversion, eversion, plantar or dorsiflexion.,Ankle: Anterior and posterior drawer test negative. No pain with inversion, eversion, dorsiflexion, or plantar flexion. Collateral ligaments intact. No joint effusion, erythema, edema, crepitus, ecchymosis, or tenderness.,Knee: Normal range of motion. No joint effusion, erythema, nontender. Anterior and posterior drawer tests negative. Lachman's test negative. Collateral ligaments intact. Bursas nontender without edema.,Wrist: Normal range of motion. No edema or effusion, nontender. Negative Tinel and Phalen tests. Normal strength all muscle groups.,Elbow: Normal range of motion. No joint effusion or erythema. Normal strength all muscle groups. Nontender. Olecranon bursa flat and nontender, no edema. Normal supination and pronation of forearm. No crepitus.,Hip: Negative swinging test. Trochanteric bursa nontender. Normal range of motion. Normal strength all muscle groups. No pain with eversion and inversion. No crepitus. Normal gait.,Psychiatric: Alert and oriented times four. No delusions or hallucinations, no loose associations, no flight of ideas, no tangentiality. Affect is appropriate. No psychomotor slowing or agitation. Eye contact is appropriate. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

MALE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION,HEENT: Pupils equal, round and reactive to light and accommodation. Extraocular movements are intact. Sclerae are anicteric. TMs are clear bilaterally. Oropharynx is clear without erythema or exudate.,NECK: Supple without lymphadenopathy or thyromegaly. Carotids are silent. There is no jugular venous distention.,CHEST: Clear to auscultation bilaterally.,CARDIOVASCULAR: Regular rate and rhythm without S3, S4. No murmurs or rubs are appreciated.,ABDOMEN: Soft, nontender, nondistended with positive bowel sounds. No masses, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly are appreciated.,GU: Normal **circumcised male. No discharge or hernias. No testicular masses.,RECTAL EXAM: Normal rectal tone. Prostate is smooth and not enlarged. Stool is Hemoccult negative.,EXTREMITIES: Reveal no clubbing, cyanosis, or edema. Peripheral pulses are +2 and equal bilaterally in all four extremities.,JOINT EXAM: Reveals no tenosynovitis.,NEUROLOGIC: Cranial nerves II through XII are grossly intact. Motor strength is 5/5 and equal in all four extremities. Deep tendon reflexes are +2/4 and equal bilaterally. Patient is alert and oriented times 3.,PSYCHIATRIC: Grossly normal.,DERMATOLOGIC: No lesions or rashes.

male physical examinationheent pupils equal round reactive light accommodation extraocular movements intact sclerae anicteric tms clear bilaterally oropharynx clear without erythema exudateneck supple without lymphadenopathy thyromegaly carotids silent jugular venous distentionchest clear auscultation bilaterallycardiovascular regular rate rhythm without murmurs rubs appreciatedabdomen soft nontender nondistended positive bowel sounds masses hepatomegaly splenomegaly appreciatedgu normal circumcised male discharge hernias testicular massesrectal exam normal rectal tone prostate smooth enlarged stool hemoccult negativeextremities reveal clubbing cyanosis edema peripheral pulses equal bilaterally four extremitiesjoint exam reveals tenosynovitisneurologic cranial nerves ii xii grossly intact motor strength equal four extremities deep tendon reflexes equal bilaterally patient alert oriented times psychiatric grossly normaldermatologic lesions rashes

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MALE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION,HEENT: Pupils equal, round and reactive to light and accommodation. Extraocular movements are intact. Sclerae are anicteric. TMs are clear bilaterally. Oropharynx is clear without erythema or exudate.,NECK: Supple without lymphadenopathy or thyromegaly. Carotids are silent. There is no jugular venous distention.,CHEST: Clear to auscultation bilaterally.,CARDIOVASCULAR: Regular rate and rhythm without S3, S4. No murmurs or rubs are appreciated.,ABDOMEN: Soft, nontender, nondistended with positive bowel sounds. No masses, hepatomegaly or splenomegaly are appreciated.,GU: Normal **circumcised male. No discharge or hernias. No testicular masses.,RECTAL EXAM: Normal rectal tone. Prostate is smooth and not enlarged. Stool is Hemoccult negative.,EXTREMITIES: Reveal no clubbing, cyanosis, or edema. Peripheral pulses are +2 and equal bilaterally in all four extremities.,JOINT EXAM: Reveals no tenosynovitis.,NEUROLOGIC: Cranial nerves II through XII are grossly intact. Motor strength is 5/5 and equal in all four extremities. Deep tendon reflexes are +2/4 and equal bilaterally. Patient is alert and oriented times 3.,PSYCHIATRIC: Grossly normal.,DERMATOLOGIC: No lesions or rashes. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS:, Strokes.,SPEECH AND LANGUAGE THERAPY DIAGNOSIS: ,Global aphasia.,SUBJECTIVE: ,The patient is a 44-year-old female who is referred to Medical Center's Outpatient Rehabilitation Department for skilled speech therapy, status post stroke. The patient's sister-in-law was present throughout this assessment and provided all the patient's previous medical history. Based on the sister-in-law's report, the patient had a stroke on 09/19/08. The patient spent 6 weeks at XY Medical Center, where she was subsequently transferred to XYZ for therapy for approximately 3 weeks. ABCD brought the patient to home the Monday before Thanksgiving, because they were not satisfied with the care the patient was receiving at a skilled nursing facility in Tucson. The patient's previous medical history includes a long history of illegal drug use to include cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and marijuana. In March of 2008, the patient had some type of potassium issue and she was hospitalized at that time. Prior to the stroke, the patient was not working and ABCD reported that she believes the patient completed the ninth grade, but she did not graduate from high school. During the case history, I did pose several questions to the patient, but her response was often "no." She was very emotional during this evaluation and crying occurred multiple times.,OBJECTIVE: ,To evaluate the patient's overall communication ability, a Western Aphasia Battery was completed. Also tests were not done due to time constraint and the patient's severe difficulty and emotional state. Speech automatic tests were also completed to determine if the patient had any functional speech.,ASSESSMENT:, Based on the results of the Weston aphasia battery, the patient's deficits most closely resemble global aphasia. On the spontaneous speech subtest, the patient responded "no" to all questions asked except for how are you today where she gave a thumbs-up. She provided no responses to picture description task and it is unclear if the patient was unable to follow the direction or if she was unable to see the picture clearly. The patient's sister-in-law did state that the patient wore glasses, but she currently does not have them and she did not know the extent the patient's visual deficit.,On the auditory verbal comprehension portion of the Western Aphasia Battery, the patient answered "no" to all "yes/no" questions. The auditory word recognition subtest, the patient had 5 out of 60 responses correct. With the sequential command, she had 10 out of 80 corrects. She was able to shut her eyes, point to the window, and point to the pen after directions. With repetition subtest, she repeated bed correctly, but no other stimuli. At this time, the patient became very emotional and repeatedly stated "I can't". During the naming subtest of the Western Aphasia Battery, the patient's responses contained numerous paraphasias and her speech was often unintelligible due to jargon. The word fluency test was not administered and the patient scored 2 out of 10 on the sentence completion task and 0 out of 10 on the responsive speech. In regards to speech automatics, the patient is able to count from 1 to 9 accurately; however, stated 7 instead of 10 at the end of the task. She is not able to state the days of the week or months in the year or her name at this time. She cannot identify the day on calendar and was unable to verbally state the date or month.,DIAGNOSTIC IMPRESSION: ,The patient's communication deficits most closely resemble global aphasia where she has difficulty with both receptive as well as expressive communication. She does perseverate and is very emotional due to probable frustration. Outpatient skilled speech therapy is recommended to improve the patient's functional communication skills.,PATIENT GOAL: , Her sister-in-law stated that they would like to improve upon the patient's speech to allow her to communicate more easily at home.,PLAN OF CARE: , Outpatient skilled speech therapy two times a week for the next 12 weeks. Therapy to include aphasia treatment and home activities.,SHORT-TERM GOALS (8 WEEKS):,1. The patient will answer simple "yes/no" questions with greater than 90% accuracy with minimal cueing.,2. The patient will be able to complete speech automatic tasks with greater than 80% accuracy without models or cueing.,3. The patient will be able to complete simple sentence completion and/or phrase completion with greater than 80% accuracy with minimal cueing.,4. The patient will be able to follow simple one-step commands with greater than 80% accuracy with minimal cueing.,5. The patient will be able to name 10 basic everyday objects with greater than 80% accuracy with minimal cueing.,SHORT-TERM GOALS (12 WEEKS):, Functional communication abilities to allow the patient to express her basic wants and needs.

medical diagnosis strokesspeech language therapy diagnosis global aphasiasubjective patient yearold female referred medical centers outpatient rehabilitation department skilled speech therapy status post stroke patients sisterinlaw present throughout assessment provided patients previous medical history based sisterinlaws report patient stroke patient spent weeks xy medical center subsequently transferred xyz therapy approximately weeks abcd brought patient home monday thanksgiving satisfied care patient receiving skilled nursing facility tucson patients previous medical history includes long history illegal drug use include cocaine crystal methamphetamine marijuana march patient type potassium issue hospitalized time prior stroke patient working abcd reported believes patient completed ninth grade graduate high school case history pose several questions patient response often emotional evaluation crying occurred multiple timesobjective evaluate patients overall communication ability western aphasia battery completed also tests done due time constraint patients severe difficulty emotional state speech automatic tests also completed determine patient functional speechassessment based results weston aphasia battery patients deficits closely resemble global aphasia spontaneous speech subtest patient responded questions asked except today gave thumbsup provided responses picture description task unclear patient unable follow direction unable see picture clearly patients sisterinlaw state patient wore glasses currently know extent patients visual deficiton auditory verbal comprehension portion western aphasia battery patient answered yesno questions auditory word recognition subtest patient responses correct sequential command corrects able shut eyes point window point pen directions repetition subtest repeated bed correctly stimuli time patient became emotional repeatedly stated cant naming subtest western aphasia battery patients responses contained numerous paraphasias speech often unintelligible due jargon word fluency test administered patient scored sentence completion task responsive speech regards speech automatics patient able count accurately however stated instead end task able state days week months year name time cannot identify day calendar unable verbally state date monthdiagnostic impression patients communication deficits closely resemble global aphasia difficulty receptive well expressive communication perseverate emotional due probable frustration outpatient skilled speech therapy recommended improve patients functional communication skillspatient goal sisterinlaw stated would like improve upon patients speech allow communicate easily homeplan care outpatient skilled speech therapy two times week next weeks therapy include aphasia treatment home activitiesshortterm goals weeks patient answer simple yesno questions greater accuracy minimal cueing patient able complete speech automatic tasks greater accuracy without models cueing patient able complete simple sentence completion andor phrase completion greater accuracy minimal cueing patient able follow simple onestep commands greater accuracy minimal cueing patient able name basic everyday objects greater accuracy minimal cueingshortterm goals weeks functional communication abilities allow patient express basic wants needs

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS:, Strokes.,SPEECH AND LANGUAGE THERAPY DIAGNOSIS: ,Global aphasia.,SUBJECTIVE: ,The patient is a 44-year-old female who is referred to Medical Center's Outpatient Rehabilitation Department for skilled speech therapy, status post stroke. The patient's sister-in-law was present throughout this assessment and provided all the patient's previous medical history. Based on the sister-in-law's report, the patient had a stroke on 09/19/08. The patient spent 6 weeks at XY Medical Center, where she was subsequently transferred to XYZ for therapy for approximately 3 weeks. ABCD brought the patient to home the Monday before Thanksgiving, because they were not satisfied with the care the patient was receiving at a skilled nursing facility in Tucson. The patient's previous medical history includes a long history of illegal drug use to include cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and marijuana. In March of 2008, the patient had some type of potassium issue and she was hospitalized at that time. Prior to the stroke, the patient was not working and ABCD reported that she believes the patient completed the ninth grade, but she did not graduate from high school. During the case history, I did pose several questions to the patient, but her response was often "no." She was very emotional during this evaluation and crying occurred multiple times.,OBJECTIVE: ,To evaluate the patient's overall communication ability, a Western Aphasia Battery was completed. Also tests were not done due to time constraint and the patient's severe difficulty and emotional state. Speech automatic tests were also completed to determine if the patient had any functional speech.,ASSESSMENT:, Based on the results of the Weston aphasia battery, the patient's deficits most closely resemble global aphasia. On the spontaneous speech subtest, the patient responded "no" to all questions asked except for how are you today where she gave a thumbs-up. She provided no responses to picture description task and it is unclear if the patient was unable to follow the direction or if she was unable to see the picture clearly. The patient's sister-in-law did state that the patient wore glasses, but she currently does not have them and she did not know the extent the patient's visual deficit.,On the auditory verbal comprehension portion of the Western Aphasia Battery, the patient answered "no" to all "yes/no" questions. The auditory word recognition subtest, the patient had 5 out of 60 responses correct. With the sequential command, she had 10 out of 80 corrects. She was able to shut her eyes, point to the window, and point to the pen after directions. With repetition subtest, she repeated bed correctly, but no other stimuli. At this time, the patient became very emotional and repeatedly stated "I can't". During the naming subtest of the Western Aphasia Battery, the patient's responses contained numerous paraphasias and her speech was often unintelligible due to jargon. The word fluency test was not administered and the patient scored 2 out of 10 on the sentence completion task and 0 out of 10 on the responsive speech. In regards to speech automatics, the patient is able to count from 1 to 9 accurately; however, stated 7 instead of 10 at the end of the task. She is not able to state the days of the week or months in the year or her name at this time. She cannot identify the day on calendar and was unable to verbally state the date or month.,DIAGNOSTIC IMPRESSION: ,The patient's communication deficits most closely resemble global aphasia where she has difficulty with both receptive as well as expressive communication. She does perseverate and is very emotional due to probable frustration. Outpatient skilled speech therapy is recommended to improve the patient's functional communication skills.,PATIENT GOAL: , Her sister-in-law stated that they would like to improve upon the patient's speech to allow her to communicate more easily at home.,PLAN OF CARE: , Outpatient skilled speech therapy two times a week for the next 12 weeks. Therapy to include aphasia treatment and home activities.,SHORT-TERM GOALS (8 WEEKS):,1. The patient will answer simple "yes/no" questions with greater than 90% accuracy with minimal cueing.,2. The patient will be able to complete speech automatic tasks with greater than 80% accuracy without models or cueing.,3. The patient will be able to complete simple sentence completion and/or phrase completion with greater than 80% accuracy with minimal cueing.,4. The patient will be able to follow simple one-step commands with greater than 80% accuracy with minimal cueing.,5. The patient will be able to name 10 basic everyday objects with greater than 80% accuracy with minimal cueing.,SHORT-TERM GOALS (12 WEEKS):, Functional communication abilities to allow the patient to express her basic wants and needs. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy.

MEDICAL PROBLEM LIST:,1. Status post multiple cerebrovascular accidents and significant left-sided upper extremity paresis in 2006.,2. Dementia and depression.,3. Hypertension.,4. History of atrial fibrillation. The patient has been in sinus rhythm as of late. The patient is not anticoagulated due to fall risk.,5. Glaucoma.,6. Degenerative arthritis of her spine.,7. GERD.,8. Hypothyroidism.,9. Chronic rhinitis (the patient declines nasal steroids).,10. Urinary urge incontinence.,11. Chronic constipation.,12. Diabetes type II, 2006.,13. Painful bunions on feet bilaterally.,CURRENT MEDICINES: , Aspirin 81 mg p.o. daily, Cymbalta 60 mg p.o. daily, Diovan 80 mg p.o. daily, felodipine 5 mg p.o. daily, omeprazole 20 mg daily, Toprol-XL 100 mg daily, Levoxyl 50 mcg daily, Lantus insulin 12 units subcutaneously h.s., simvastatin 10 mg p.o. daily, AyrGel to both nostrils twice daily, Senna S 2 tablets twice daily, Timoptic 1 drop both eyes twice daily, Tylenol 1000 mg 3 times daily, Xalatan 0.005% drops 1 drop both eyes at bedtime, and Tucks to rectum post BMs.,ALLERGIES: , NO KNOWN DRUG ALLERGIES. ACE INHIBITOR MAY HAVE CAUSED A COUGH.,CODE STATUS:, Do not resuscitate, healthcare proxy, palliative care orders in place.,DIET:, No added salt, no concentrated sweets, thin liquids.,RESTRAINTS:, None. The patient has declined use of chair check and bed check.,INTERVAL HISTORY: , Overall, the patient has been doing reasonably well. She is being treated for some hemorrhoids, which are not painful for her. There has been a note that she is constipated.,Her blood glucoses have been running reasonably well in the morning, perhaps a bit on the high side with the highest of 188. I see a couple in the 150s. However, I also see one that is in the one teens and a couple in the 120s range.,She is not bothered by cough or rib pain. These are complaints, which I often hear about.,Today, I reviewed Dr. Hudyncia's note from psychiatry. Depression responded very well to Cymbalta, and the plan is to continue it probably for a minimum of 1 year.,She is not having problems with breathing. No neurologic complaints or troubles. Pain is generally well managed just with Tylenol.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , Vitals: As in chart. The patient is pleasant and cooperative. She is in no apparent distress. Her lungs are clear to auscultation and percussion. Heart sounds regular to me. Abdomen: Soft. Extremities without any edema. At the rectum, she has a couple of large hemorrhoids, which are not thrombosed and are not tender.,ASSESSMENT AND PLAN:,1. Hypertension, good control, continue current.,2. Depression, well treated on Cymbalta. Continue.,3. Other issues seem to be doing pretty well. These include blood pressure, which is well controlled. We will continue the medicines. She is clinically euthyroid. We check that occasionally. Continue Tylenol.,4. For the bowels, I will increase the intensity of regimen there. I have a feeling she would not tolerate either the FiberCon tablets or Metamucil powder in a drink. I will try her on annulose and see how she does with that.

medical problem list status post multiple cerebrovascular accidents significant leftsided upper extremity paresis dementia depression hypertension history atrial fibrillation patient sinus rhythm late patient anticoagulated due fall risk glaucoma degenerative arthritis spine gerd hypothyroidism chronic rhinitis patient declines nasal steroids urinary urge incontinence chronic constipation diabetes type ii painful bunions feet bilaterallycurrent medicines aspirin mg po daily cymbalta mg po daily diovan mg po daily felodipine mg po daily omeprazole mg daily toprolxl mg daily levoxyl mcg daily lantus insulin units subcutaneously hs simvastatin mg po daily ayrgel nostrils twice daily senna tablets twice daily timoptic drop eyes twice daily tylenol mg times daily xalatan drops drop eyes bedtime tucks rectum post bmsallergies known drug allergies ace inhibitor may caused coughcode status resuscitate healthcare proxy palliative care orders placediet added salt concentrated sweets thin liquidsrestraints none patient declined use chair check bed checkinterval history overall patient reasonably well treated hemorrhoids painful note constipatedher blood glucoses running reasonably well morning perhaps bit high side highest see couple however also see one one teens couple rangeshe bothered cough rib pain complaints often hear abouttoday reviewed dr hudyncias note psychiatry depression responded well cymbalta plan continue probably minimum yearshe problems breathing neurologic complaints troubles pain generally well managed tylenolphysical examination vitals chart patient pleasant cooperative apparent distress lungs clear auscultation percussion heart sounds regular abdomen soft extremities without edema rectum couple large hemorrhoids thrombosed tenderassessment plan hypertension good control continue current depression well treated cymbalta continue issues seem pretty well include blood pressure well controlled continue medicines clinically euthyroid check occasionally continue tylenol bowels increase intensity regimen feeling would tolerate either fibercon tablets metamucil powder drink try annulose see

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MEDICAL PROBLEM LIST:,1. Status post multiple cerebrovascular accidents and significant left-sided upper extremity paresis in 2006.,2. Dementia and depression.,3. Hypertension.,4. History of atrial fibrillation. The patient has been in sinus rhythm as of late. The patient is not anticoagulated due to fall risk.,5. Glaucoma.,6. Degenerative arthritis of her spine.,7. GERD.,8. Hypothyroidism.,9. Chronic rhinitis (the patient declines nasal steroids).,10. Urinary urge incontinence.,11. Chronic constipation.,12. Diabetes type II, 2006.,13. Painful bunions on feet bilaterally.,CURRENT MEDICINES: , Aspirin 81 mg p.o. daily, Cymbalta 60 mg p.o. daily, Diovan 80 mg p.o. daily, felodipine 5 mg p.o. daily, omeprazole 20 mg daily, Toprol-XL 100 mg daily, Levoxyl 50 mcg daily, Lantus insulin 12 units subcutaneously h.s., simvastatin 10 mg p.o. daily, AyrGel to both nostrils twice daily, Senna S 2 tablets twice daily, Timoptic 1 drop both eyes twice daily, Tylenol 1000 mg 3 times daily, Xalatan 0.005% drops 1 drop both eyes at bedtime, and Tucks to rectum post BMs.,ALLERGIES: , NO KNOWN DRUG ALLERGIES. ACE INHIBITOR MAY HAVE CAUSED A COUGH.,CODE STATUS:, Do not resuscitate, healthcare proxy, palliative care orders in place.,DIET:, No added salt, no concentrated sweets, thin liquids.,RESTRAINTS:, None. The patient has declined use of chair check and bed check.,INTERVAL HISTORY: , Overall, the patient has been doing reasonably well. She is being treated for some hemorrhoids, which are not painful for her. There has been a note that she is constipated.,Her blood glucoses have been running reasonably well in the morning, perhaps a bit on the high side with the highest of 188. I see a couple in the 150s. However, I also see one that is in the one teens and a couple in the 120s range.,She is not bothered by cough or rib pain. These are complaints, which I often hear about.,Today, I reviewed Dr. Hudyncia's note from psychiatry. Depression responded very well to Cymbalta, and the plan is to continue it probably for a minimum of 1 year.,She is not having problems with breathing. No neurologic complaints or troubles. Pain is generally well managed just with Tylenol.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , Vitals: As in chart. The patient is pleasant and cooperative. She is in no apparent distress. Her lungs are clear to auscultation and percussion. Heart sounds regular to me. Abdomen: Soft. Extremities without any edema. At the rectum, she has a couple of large hemorrhoids, which are not thrombosed and are not tender.,ASSESSMENT AND PLAN:,1. Hypertension, good control, continue current.,2. Depression, well treated on Cymbalta. Continue.,3. Other issues seem to be doing pretty well. These include blood pressure, which is well controlled. We will continue the medicines. She is clinically euthyroid. We check that occasionally. Continue Tylenol.,4. For the bowels, I will increase the intensity of regimen there. I have a feeling she would not tolerate either the FiberCon tablets or Metamucil powder in a drink. I will try her on annulose and see how she does with that. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

MEDICATIONS: , Plavix, atenolol, Lipitor, and folic acid.,CLINICAL HISTORY: ,This is a 41-year-old male patient who comes in with chest pain, had had a previous MI in 07/2003 and stents placement in 2003, who comes in for a stress myocardial perfusion scan.,With the patient at rest, 10.3 mCi of Cardiolite technetium-99 m sestamibi was injected and myocardial perfusion imaging was obtained.,PROCEDURE AND INTERPRETATION: ,The patient exercised for a total of 12 minutes on the standard Bruce protocol. The peak workload was 12.8 METS. The resting heart rate was 57 beats per minute and the peak heart rate was 123 beats per minute, which was 69% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate response. The blood pressure response was normal with a resting blood pressure of 130/100 and a peak blood pressure of 158/90. The test was stopped due to fatigue and leg pain. EKG at rest showed normal sinus rhythm. The peak stress EKG did not reveal any ischemic ST-T wave abnormalities. There was ventricular bigeminy seen during exercise, but no sustained tachycardia was seen. At peak, there was no chest pain noted. The test was stopped due to fatigue and left pain. At peak stress, the patient was injected with 30.3 mCi of Cardiolite technetium-99 m sestamibi and myocardial perfusion imaging was obtained, and was compared to resting myocardial perfusion imaging.,MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING:,1. The overall quality of the scan was good.,2. There was no diagnostic abnormality on the rest and stress myocardial perfusion imaging.,3. The left ventricular cavity appeared normal in size.,4. Gated SPECT images revealed mild septal hypokinesis and mild apical hypokinesis. Overall left ventricular systolic function was low normal with calculated ejection fraction of 46% at rest.,CONCLUSIONS:,1. Good exercise tolerance.,2. Less than adequate cardiac stress. The patient was on beta-blocker therapy.,3. No EKG evidence of stress induced ischemia.,4. No chest pain with stress.,5. Mild ventricular bigeminy with exercise.,6. No diagnostic abnormality on the rest and stress myocardial perfusion imaging.,7. Gated SPECT images revealed septal and apical hypokinesis with overall low normal left ventricular systolic function with calculated ejection fraction of 46% at rest.

medications plavix atenolol lipitor folic acidclinical history yearold male patient comes chest pain previous mi stents placement comes stress myocardial perfusion scanwith patient rest mci cardiolite technetium sestamibi injected myocardial perfusion imaging obtainedprocedure interpretation patient exercised total minutes standard bruce protocol peak workload mets resting heart rate beats per minute peak heart rate beats per minute agepredicted maximum heart rate response blood pressure response normal resting blood pressure peak blood pressure test stopped due fatigue leg pain ekg rest showed normal sinus rhythm peak stress ekg reveal ischemic stt wave abnormalities ventricular bigeminy seen exercise sustained tachycardia seen peak chest pain noted test stopped due fatigue left pain peak stress patient injected mci cardiolite technetium sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging obtained compared resting myocardial perfusion imagingmyocardial perfusion imaging overall quality scan good diagnostic abnormality rest stress myocardial perfusion imaging left ventricular cavity appeared normal size gated spect images revealed mild septal hypokinesis mild apical hypokinesis overall left ventricular systolic function low normal calculated ejection fraction restconclusions good exercise tolerance less adequate cardiac stress patient betablocker therapy ekg evidence stress induced ischemia chest pain stress mild ventricular bigeminy exercise diagnostic abnormality rest stress myocardial perfusion imaging gated spect images revealed septal apical hypokinesis overall low normal left ventricular systolic function calculated ejection fraction rest

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MEDICATIONS: , Plavix, atenolol, Lipitor, and folic acid.,CLINICAL HISTORY: ,This is a 41-year-old male patient who comes in with chest pain, had had a previous MI in 07/2003 and stents placement in 2003, who comes in for a stress myocardial perfusion scan.,With the patient at rest, 10.3 mCi of Cardiolite technetium-99 m sestamibi was injected and myocardial perfusion imaging was obtained.,PROCEDURE AND INTERPRETATION: ,The patient exercised for a total of 12 minutes on the standard Bruce protocol. The peak workload was 12.8 METS. The resting heart rate was 57 beats per minute and the peak heart rate was 123 beats per minute, which was 69% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate response. The blood pressure response was normal with a resting blood pressure of 130/100 and a peak blood pressure of 158/90. The test was stopped due to fatigue and leg pain. EKG at rest showed normal sinus rhythm. The peak stress EKG did not reveal any ischemic ST-T wave abnormalities. There was ventricular bigeminy seen during exercise, but no sustained tachycardia was seen. At peak, there was no chest pain noted. The test was stopped due to fatigue and left pain. At peak stress, the patient was injected with 30.3 mCi of Cardiolite technetium-99 m sestamibi and myocardial perfusion imaging was obtained, and was compared to resting myocardial perfusion imaging.,MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING:,1. The overall quality of the scan was good.,2. There was no diagnostic abnormality on the rest and stress myocardial perfusion imaging.,3. The left ventricular cavity appeared normal in size.,4. Gated SPECT images revealed mild septal hypokinesis and mild apical hypokinesis. Overall left ventricular systolic function was low normal with calculated ejection fraction of 46% at rest.,CONCLUSIONS:,1. Good exercise tolerance.,2. Less than adequate cardiac stress. The patient was on beta-blocker therapy.,3. No EKG evidence of stress induced ischemia.,4. No chest pain with stress.,5. Mild ventricular bigeminy with exercise.,6. No diagnostic abnormality on the rest and stress myocardial perfusion imaging.,7. Gated SPECT images revealed septal and apical hypokinesis with overall low normal left ventricular systolic function with calculated ejection fraction of 46% at rest. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

MEDICATIONS:, None.,DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE:, After informed consent was obtained, the patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position and the Olympus video colonoscope was inserted through the anus and advanced in retrograde fashion for a distance of *** cm to the proximal descending colon and then slowly withdrawn. The mucosa appeared normal. Retroflex examination of the rectum was normal.

medications nonedescription procedure informed consent obtained patient placed left lateral decubitus position olympus video colonoscope inserted anus advanced retrograde fashion distance cm proximal descending colon slowly withdrawn mucosa appeared normal retroflex examination rectum normal

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MEDICATIONS:, None.,DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE:, After informed consent was obtained, the patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position and the Olympus video colonoscope was inserted through the anus and advanced in retrograde fashion for a distance of *** cm to the proximal descending colon and then slowly withdrawn. The mucosa appeared normal. Retroflex examination of the rectum was normal. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

MEDICATIONS:,1. Versed intravenously.,2. Demerol intravenously.,DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE: , After informed consent was obtained, the patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position and sedated with the above medications. The Olympus video colonoscope was inserted through the anus and was advanced in retrograde fashion through the sigmoid colon, descending colon, around the splenic flexure, into the transverse colon, around the hepatic flexure, down the ascending colon, into the cecum. The cecum was identified by the presence of the appendiceal orifice and the ileocecal valve. The colonoscope was then advanced through the ileocecal valve into the terminal ileum, which was normal on examination. The scope was then pulled back into the cecum and then slowly withdrawn. The mucosa was examined in detail. The mucosa was entirely normal. Upon reaching the rectum, retroflex examination of the rectum was normal. The scope was then straightened out, the air removed and the scope withdrawn. The patient tolerated the procedure well. There were no apparent complications.,

medications versed intravenously demerol intravenouslydescription procedure informed consent obtained patient placed left lateral decubitus position sedated medications olympus video colonoscope inserted anus advanced retrograde fashion sigmoid colon descending colon around splenic flexure transverse colon around hepatic flexure ascending colon cecum cecum identified presence appendiceal orifice ileocecal valve colonoscope advanced ileocecal valve terminal ileum normal examination scope pulled back cecum slowly withdrawn mucosa examined detail mucosa entirely normal upon reaching rectum retroflex examination rectum normal scope straightened air removed scope withdrawn patient tolerated procedure well apparent complications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MEDICATIONS:,1. Versed intravenously.,2. Demerol intravenously.,DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE: , After informed consent was obtained, the patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position and sedated with the above medications. The Olympus video colonoscope was inserted through the anus and was advanced in retrograde fashion through the sigmoid colon, descending colon, around the splenic flexure, into the transverse colon, around the hepatic flexure, down the ascending colon, into the cecum. The cecum was identified by the presence of the appendiceal orifice and the ileocecal valve. The colonoscope was then advanced through the ileocecal valve into the terminal ileum, which was normal on examination. The scope was then pulled back into the cecum and then slowly withdrawn. The mucosa was examined in detail. The mucosa was entirely normal. Upon reaching the rectum, retroflex examination of the rectum was normal. The scope was then straightened out, the air removed and the scope withdrawn. The patient tolerated the procedure well. There were no apparent complications., ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

MEDICATIONS:,1. Versed intravenously.,2. Demerol intravenously.,DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE: , After informed consent, the patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position and Cetacaine spray was applied to the posterior pharynx. The patient was sedated with the above medications. The Olympus video panendoscope was advanced under direct vision into the esophagus. The esophagus was normal in appearance and configuration. The gastroesophageal junction was normal. The scope was advanced into the stomach, where the fundic pool was aspirated and the stomach was insufflated with air. The gastric mucosa appeared normal. The pylorus was normal. The scope was advanced through the pylorus into the duodenal bulb, which was normal, then into the second part of the duodenum, which was normal as well. The scope was pulled back into the stomach. Retroflexed view showed a normal incisura, lesser curvature, cardia and fundus. The scope was straightened out, the air removed and the scope withdrawn. The patient tolerated the procedure well. There were no apparent complications.,

medications versed intravenously demerol intravenouslydescription procedure informed consent patient placed left lateral decubitus position cetacaine spray applied posterior pharynx patient sedated medications olympus video panendoscope advanced direct vision esophagus esophagus normal appearance configuration gastroesophageal junction normal scope advanced stomach fundic pool aspirated stomach insufflated air gastric mucosa appeared normal pylorus normal scope advanced pylorus duodenal bulb normal second part duodenum normal well scope pulled back stomach retroflexed view showed normal incisura lesser curvature cardia fundus scope straightened air removed scope withdrawn patient tolerated procedure well apparent complications

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MEDICATIONS:,1. Versed intravenously.,2. Demerol intravenously.,DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURE: , After informed consent, the patient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position and Cetacaine spray was applied to the posterior pharynx. The patient was sedated with the above medications. The Olympus video panendoscope was advanced under direct vision into the esophagus. The esophagus was normal in appearance and configuration. The gastroesophageal junction was normal. The scope was advanced into the stomach, where the fundic pool was aspirated and the stomach was insufflated with air. The gastric mucosa appeared normal. The pylorus was normal. The scope was advanced through the pylorus into the duodenal bulb, which was normal, then into the second part of the duodenum, which was normal as well. The scope was pulled back into the stomach. Retroflexed view showed a normal incisura, lesser curvature, cardia and fundus. The scope was straightened out, the air removed and the scope withdrawn. The patient tolerated the procedure well. There were no apparent complications., ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery

MULTISYSTEM EXAM,CONSTITUTIONAL: ,The vital signs showed that the patient was afebrile; blood pressure and heart rate were within normal limits. The patient appeared alert.,EYES: ,The conjunctiva was clear. The pupil was equal and reactive. There was no ptosis. The irides appeared normal.,EARS, NOSE AND THROAT: ,The ears and the nose appeared normal in appearance. Hearing was grossly intact. The oropharynx showed that the mucosa was moist. There was no lesion that I could see in the palate, tongue. tonsil or posterior pharynx.,NECK: ,The neck was supple. The thyroid gland was not enlarged by palpation.,RESPIRATORY: ,The patient's respiratory effort was normal. Auscultation of the lung showed it to be clear with good air movement.,CARDIOVASCULAR: ,Auscultation of the heart revealed S1 and S2 with regular rate with no murmur noted. The extremities showed no edema.,GASTROINTESTINAL: , The abdomen was soft, nontender with no rebound, no guarding, no enlarged liver or spleen. Bowel sounds were present.,GU: , The scrotal elements were normal. The testes were without discrete mass. The penis showed no lesion, no discharge.,LYMPHATIC: ,There was no appreciated node that I could feel in the groin or neck area.,MUSCULOSKELETAL: ,The head and neck by inspection showed no obvious deformity. Again, the extremities showed no obvious deformity. Range of motion appeared to be normal for the upper and lower extremities.,SKIN: , Inspection of the skin and subcutaneous tissues appeared to be normal. The skin was pink, warm and dry to touch.,NEUROLOGIC: ,Deep tendon reflexes were symmetrical at the patellar area. Sensation was grossly intact by touch.,PSYCHIATRIC: , The patient was oriented to time, place and person. The patient's judgment and insight appeared to be normal.

multisystem examconstitutional vital signs showed patient afebrile blood pressure heart rate within normal limits patient appeared alerteyes conjunctiva clear pupil equal reactive ptosis irides appeared normalears nose throat ears nose appeared normal appearance hearing grossly intact oropharynx showed mucosa moist lesion could see palate tongue tonsil posterior pharynxneck neck supple thyroid gland enlarged palpationrespiratory patients respiratory effort normal auscultation lung showed clear good air movementcardiovascular auscultation heart revealed regular rate murmur noted extremities showed edemagastrointestinal abdomen soft nontender rebound guarding enlarged liver spleen bowel sounds presentgu scrotal elements normal testes without discrete mass penis showed lesion dischargelymphatic appreciated node could feel groin neck areamusculoskeletal head neck inspection showed obvious deformity extremities showed obvious deformity range motion appeared normal upper lower extremitiesskin inspection skin subcutaneous tissues appeared normal skin pink warm dry touchneurologic deep tendon reflexes symmetrical patellar area sensation grossly intact touchpsychiatric patient oriented time place person patients judgment insight appeared normal

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MULTISYSTEM EXAM,CONSTITUTIONAL: ,The vital signs showed that the patient was afebrile; blood pressure and heart rate were within normal limits. The patient appeared alert.,EYES: ,The conjunctiva was clear. The pupil was equal and reactive. There was no ptosis. The irides appeared normal.,EARS, NOSE AND THROAT: ,The ears and the nose appeared normal in appearance. Hearing was grossly intact. The oropharynx showed that the mucosa was moist. There was no lesion that I could see in the palate, tongue. tonsil or posterior pharynx.,NECK: ,The neck was supple. The thyroid gland was not enlarged by palpation.,RESPIRATORY: ,The patient's respiratory effort was normal. Auscultation of the lung showed it to be clear with good air movement.,CARDIOVASCULAR: ,Auscultation of the heart revealed S1 and S2 with regular rate with no murmur noted. The extremities showed no edema.,GASTROINTESTINAL: , The abdomen was soft, nontender with no rebound, no guarding, no enlarged liver or spleen. Bowel sounds were present.,GU: , The scrotal elements were normal. The testes were without discrete mass. The penis showed no lesion, no discharge.,LYMPHATIC: ,There was no appreciated node that I could feel in the groin or neck area.,MUSCULOSKELETAL: ,The head and neck by inspection showed no obvious deformity. Again, the extremities showed no obvious deformity. Range of motion appeared to be normal for the upper and lower extremities.,SKIN: , Inspection of the skin and subcutaneous tissues appeared to be normal. The skin was pink, warm and dry to touch.,NEUROLOGIC: ,Deep tendon reflexes were symmetrical at the patellar area. Sensation was grossly intact by touch.,PSYCHIATRIC: , The patient was oriented to time, place and person. The patient's judgment and insight appeared to be normal. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

MULTISYSTEM EXAM,CONSTITUTIONAL: , The vital signs showed that the patient was afebrile; blood pressure and heart rate were within normal limits. The patient appeared alert.,EYES: , The conjunctiva was clear. The pupil was equal and reactive. There was no ptosis. The irides appeared normal.,EARS, NOSE AND THROAT: , The ears and the nose appeared normal in appearance. Hearing was grossly intact. The oropharynx showed that the mucosa was moist. There was no lesion that I could see in the palate, tongue. tonsil or posterior pharynx.,NECK: , The neck was supple. The thyroid gland was not enlarged by palpation.,RESPIRATORY: ,The patient's respiratory effort was normal. Auscultation of the lung showed it to be clear with good air movement.,CARDIOVASCULAR: , Auscultation of the heart revealed S1 and S2 with regular rate with no murmur noted. The extremities showed no edema.,BREASTS: ,Breast inspection showed them to be symmetrical with no nipple discharge. Palpation of the breasts and axilla revealed no obvious mass that I could appreciate.,GASTROINTESTINAL: ,The abdomen was soft, nontender with no rebound, no guarding, no enlarged liver or spleen. Bowel sounds were present.,GU: ,The external genitalia appeared to be normal. The pelvic exam revealed no adnexal masses. The uterus appeared to be normal in size and there was no cervical motion tenderness.,LYMPHATIC: ,There was no appreciated node that I could feel in the groin or neck area.,MUSCULOSKELETAL: ,The head and neck by inspection showed no obvious deformity. Again, the extremities showed no obvious deformity. Range of motion appeared to be normal for the upper and lower extremities.,SKIN:, Inspection of the skin and subcutaneous tissues appeared to be normal. The skin was pink, warm and dry to touch.,NEUROLOGIC: , Deep tendon reflexes were symmetrical at the patellar area. Sensation was grossly intact by touch.,PSYCHIATRIC: ,The patient was oriented to time, place and person. The patient's judgment and insight appeared to be normal.

multisystem examconstitutional vital signs showed patient afebrile blood pressure heart rate within normal limits patient appeared alerteyes conjunctiva clear pupil equal reactive ptosis irides appeared normalears nose throat ears nose appeared normal appearance hearing grossly intact oropharynx showed mucosa moist lesion could see palate tongue tonsil posterior pharynxneck neck supple thyroid gland enlarged palpationrespiratory patients respiratory effort normal auscultation lung showed clear good air movementcardiovascular auscultation heart revealed regular rate murmur noted extremities showed edemabreasts breast inspection showed symmetrical nipple discharge palpation breasts axilla revealed obvious mass could appreciategastrointestinal abdomen soft nontender rebound guarding enlarged liver spleen bowel sounds presentgu external genitalia appeared normal pelvic exam revealed adnexal masses uterus appeared normal size cervical motion tendernesslymphatic appreciated node could feel groin neck areamusculoskeletal head neck inspection showed obvious deformity extremities showed obvious deformity range motion appeared normal upper lower extremitiesskin inspection skin subcutaneous tissues appeared normal skin pink warm dry touchneurologic deep tendon reflexes symmetrical patellar area sensation grossly intact touchpsychiatric patient oriented time place person patients judgment insight appeared normal

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MULTISYSTEM EXAM,CONSTITUTIONAL: , The vital signs showed that the patient was afebrile; blood pressure and heart rate were within normal limits. The patient appeared alert.,EYES: , The conjunctiva was clear. The pupil was equal and reactive. There was no ptosis. The irides appeared normal.,EARS, NOSE AND THROAT: , The ears and the nose appeared normal in appearance. Hearing was grossly intact. The oropharynx showed that the mucosa was moist. There was no lesion that I could see in the palate, tongue. tonsil or posterior pharynx.,NECK: , The neck was supple. The thyroid gland was not enlarged by palpation.,RESPIRATORY: ,The patient's respiratory effort was normal. Auscultation of the lung showed it to be clear with good air movement.,CARDIOVASCULAR: , Auscultation of the heart revealed S1 and S2 with regular rate with no murmur noted. The extremities showed no edema.,BREASTS: ,Breast inspection showed them to be symmetrical with no nipple discharge. Palpation of the breasts and axilla revealed no obvious mass that I could appreciate.,GASTROINTESTINAL: ,The abdomen was soft, nontender with no rebound, no guarding, no enlarged liver or spleen. Bowel sounds were present.,GU: ,The external genitalia appeared to be normal. The pelvic exam revealed no adnexal masses. The uterus appeared to be normal in size and there was no cervical motion tenderness.,LYMPHATIC: ,There was no appreciated node that I could feel in the groin or neck area.,MUSCULOSKELETAL: ,The head and neck by inspection showed no obvious deformity. Again, the extremities showed no obvious deformity. Range of motion appeared to be normal for the upper and lower extremities.,SKIN:, Inspection of the skin and subcutaneous tissues appeared to be normal. The skin was pink, warm and dry to touch.,NEUROLOGIC: , Deep tendon reflexes were symmetrical at the patellar area. Sensation was grossly intact by touch.,PSYCHIATRIC: ,The patient was oriented to time, place and person. The patient's judgment and insight appeared to be normal. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

MYOVIEW NUCLEAR STRESS STUDY,REASON FOR THE TEST:, Angina, coronary artery disease.,FINDINGS: , The patient exercised according to the Lexiscan nuclear stress study, received a total of 0.4 mg of Lexiscan. At peak hyperemic effect, 25.8 mCi of Myoview injected for the stress imaging and earlier 8.1 mCi of Myoview injected for the resting and the usual SPECT and gated SPECT protocol was followed in the rest-stress sequence.,The data analyzed using Cedars-Sinai software.,The resting heart rate was 49 with the resting blood pressure of 149/86. Maximum heart rate achieved was 69 with a maximum blood pressure achieved of 172/76.,EKG at rest showed to be abnormal with sinus rhythm, left atrial enlargement, and inverted T-wave in 1, 2, and aVL as well as from V4 to V6 with LVH. Maximal stress test EKG showed no change from baseline.,IMPRESSION: ,Maximal Lexiscan stress test with abnormal EKG at baseline maximal stress test, please refer to the Myoview interpretation.,MYOVIEW INTERPRETATIONS,FINDINGS: , The left ventricle appears to be dilated on both stress and rest with no significant change between stress and rest with left ventricular end-diastolic volume of 227, end-systolic volume of 154 with moderately to severely reduced LV function with akinesis of the inferior and inferoseptal wall. EF was calculated at 32%, estimated 35% to 40%.,Cardiac perfusion reviewed, showed a large area of moderate-to-severe intensity in the inferior wall and small-to-medium area of severe intensity at the apex and inferoapical wall. Both defects showed no change on the resting indicative of a fixed defect in the inferior and inferoapical wall consistent with old inferior inferoapical MI. No reversible defects indicative of myocardium at risk. The lateral walls as well as the septum and most of the anterior wall showed no reversibility and near-normal perfusion.,IMPRESSION:,1. Large fixed defect, inferior and apical wall, related to old myocardial infarction.,2. No reversible ischemia identified.,3. Moderately reduced left ventricular function with ejection fraction of about 35% consistent with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

myoview nuclear stress studyreason test angina coronary artery diseasefindings patient exercised according lexiscan nuclear stress study received total mg lexiscan peak hyperemic effect mci myoview injected stress imaging earlier mci myoview injected resting usual spect gated spect protocol followed reststress sequencethe data analyzed using cedarssinai softwarethe resting heart rate resting blood pressure maximum heart rate achieved maximum blood pressure achieved ekg rest showed abnormal sinus rhythm left atrial enlargement inverted twave avl well v v lvh maximal stress test ekg showed change baselineimpression maximal lexiscan stress test abnormal ekg baseline maximal stress test please refer myoview interpretationmyoview interpretationsfindings left ventricle appears dilated stress rest significant change stress rest left ventricular enddiastolic volume endsystolic volume moderately severely reduced lv function akinesis inferior inferoseptal wall ef calculated estimated cardiac perfusion reviewed showed large area moderatetosevere intensity inferior wall smalltomedium area severe intensity apex inferoapical wall defects showed change resting indicative fixed defect inferior inferoapical wall consistent old inferior inferoapical mi reversible defects indicative myocardium risk lateral walls well septum anterior wall showed reversibility nearnormal perfusionimpression large fixed defect inferior apical wall related old myocardial infarction reversible ischemia identified moderately reduced left ventricular function ejection fraction consistent ischemic cardiomyopathy

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: MYOVIEW NUCLEAR STRESS STUDY,REASON FOR THE TEST:, Angina, coronary artery disease.,FINDINGS: , The patient exercised according to the Lexiscan nuclear stress study, received a total of 0.4 mg of Lexiscan. At peak hyperemic effect, 25.8 mCi of Myoview injected for the stress imaging and earlier 8.1 mCi of Myoview injected for the resting and the usual SPECT and gated SPECT protocol was followed in the rest-stress sequence.,The data analyzed using Cedars-Sinai software.,The resting heart rate was 49 with the resting blood pressure of 149/86. Maximum heart rate achieved was 69 with a maximum blood pressure achieved of 172/76.,EKG at rest showed to be abnormal with sinus rhythm, left atrial enlargement, and inverted T-wave in 1, 2, and aVL as well as from V4 to V6 with LVH. Maximal stress test EKG showed no change from baseline.,IMPRESSION: ,Maximal Lexiscan stress test with abnormal EKG at baseline maximal stress test, please refer to the Myoview interpretation.,MYOVIEW INTERPRETATIONS,FINDINGS: , The left ventricle appears to be dilated on both stress and rest with no significant change between stress and rest with left ventricular end-diastolic volume of 227, end-systolic volume of 154 with moderately to severely reduced LV function with akinesis of the inferior and inferoseptal wall. EF was calculated at 32%, estimated 35% to 40%.,Cardiac perfusion reviewed, showed a large area of moderate-to-severe intensity in the inferior wall and small-to-medium area of severe intensity at the apex and inferoapical wall. Both defects showed no change on the resting indicative of a fixed defect in the inferior and inferoapical wall consistent with old inferior inferoapical MI. No reversible defects indicative of myocardium at risk. The lateral walls as well as the septum and most of the anterior wall showed no reversibility and near-normal perfusion.,IMPRESSION:,1. Large fixed defect, inferior and apical wall, related to old myocardial infarction.,2. No reversible ischemia identified.,3. Moderately reduced left ventricular function with ejection fraction of about 35% consistent with ischemic cardiomyopathy. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

Mr. ABC was transferred to room 123 this afternoon. We discussed this with the nurses, and it was of course cleared by Dr. X. The patient is now on his third postoperative day for an open reduction and internal fixation for two facial fractures, as well as open reduction nasal fracture. He is on his eighth hospital day.,The patient had nasal packing in place, which was removed this evening. This will make it much easier for him to swallow. This will facilitate p.o. fluids and IMF diet.,Examination of the face revealed some decreased swelling today. He had good occlusion with intact intermaxillary fixation.,His tracheotomy tube is in place. It is a size 8 Shiley nonfenestrated. He is being suctioned comfortably.,The patient is in need of something for sleep in the evening, so we have recommended Halcion 5 mg at bedtime and repeat of 5 mg in 1 hour if needed.,Tomorrow, we will go ahead and change his trach to a noncuffed or a fenestrated tube, so he may communicate and again this will facilitate his swallowing. Hopefully, we can decannulate the tracheotomy tube in the next few days.,Overall, I believe this patient is doing well, and we will look forward to being able to transfer him to the prison infirmary.

mr abc transferred room afternoon discussed nurses course cleared dr x patient third postoperative day open reduction internal fixation two facial fractures well open reduction nasal fracture eighth hospital daythe patient nasal packing place removed evening make much easier swallow facilitate po fluids imf dietexamination face revealed decreased swelling today good occlusion intact intermaxillary fixationhis tracheotomy tube place size shiley nonfenestrated suctioned comfortablythe patient need something sleep evening recommended halcion mg bedtime repeat mg hour neededtomorrow go ahead change trach noncuffed fenestrated tube may communicate facilitate swallowing hopefully decannulate tracheotomy tube next daysoverall believe patient well look forward able transfer prison infirmary

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: Mr. ABC was transferred to room 123 this afternoon. We discussed this with the nurses, and it was of course cleared by Dr. X. The patient is now on his third postoperative day for an open reduction and internal fixation for two facial fractures, as well as open reduction nasal fracture. He is on his eighth hospital day.,The patient had nasal packing in place, which was removed this evening. This will make it much easier for him to swallow. This will facilitate p.o. fluids and IMF diet.,Examination of the face revealed some decreased swelling today. He had good occlusion with intact intermaxillary fixation.,His tracheotomy tube is in place. It is a size 8 Shiley nonfenestrated. He is being suctioned comfortably.,The patient is in need of something for sleep in the evening, so we have recommended Halcion 5 mg at bedtime and repeat of 5 mg in 1 hour if needed.,Tomorrow, we will go ahead and change his trach to a noncuffed or a fenestrated tube, so he may communicate and again this will facilitate his swallowing. Hopefully, we can decannulate the tracheotomy tube in the next few days.,Overall, I believe this patient is doing well, and we will look forward to being able to transfer him to the prison infirmary. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology, SOAP / Chart / Progress Notes

Mr. XYZ forgot his hearing aids at home today and is severely hearing impaired and most of the interview had to be conducted with me yelling at him at the top of my voice. For all these reasons, this was not really under the best circumstances and I had to curtail the amount of time I spent trying to get a history because of the physical effort required in extracting information from this patient. The patient was seen late because he had not filled in the patient questionnaire. To summarize the history here, Mr. XYZ who is not very clear on events from the past, sustained a work-related injury some time in 1998. At that time, he was driving an 18-wheeler truck. The patient indicated that he slipped off the rear of his truck while loading vehicles to his trailer. He experienced severe low back pain and eventually a short while later, underwent a fusion of L4-L5 and L5-S1. The patient had an uneventful hospital course from the surgery, which was done somewhere in Florida by a surgeon, who he does not remember. He was able to return to his usual occupation, but then again had a second work-related injury in May of 2005. At that time, he was required to boat trucks to his rig and also to use a chain-pulley system to raise and lower the vehicles. Mr. XYZ felt a popping sound in his back and had excruciating low back pain and had to be transported to the nearest hospital. He was MRI'ed at that time, which apparently showed a re-herniation of an L5-S1 disc and then, he somehow ended up in Houston, where he underwent fusion by Dr. W from L3 through S2. This was done on 12/15/2005. Initially, he did fairly well and was able to walk and move around, but then gradually the pain reappeared and he started getting severe left-sided leg pain going down the lateral aspect of the left leg into his foot. He is still complaining of the severe pain right now with tingling in the medial two toes of the foot and significant weakness in his left leg. The patient was referred to Dr. A, pain management specialist and Dr. A has maintained him on opioid medications consisting of Norco 10/325 mg for breakthrough pain and oxycodone 30 mg t.i.d. with Lunesta 3 mg q.h.s. for sleep, Carisoprodol 350 mg t.i.d., and Lyrica 100 mg q.daily. The patient states that he is experiencing no side effects from medications and takes medications as required. He has apparently been drug screened and his drug screening has been found to be normal. The patient underwent an extensive behavioral evaluation on 05/22/06 by TIR Rehab Center. At that time, it was felt that Mr. XYZ showed a degree of moderate level of depression. There were no indications in the evaluation that Mr. XYZ showed any addictive or noncompliant type behaviors. It was felt at that time that Mr. XYZ would benefit from a brief period of individual psychotherapy and a course of psychotropic medications. Of concern to the therapist at that time was the patient's untreated and unmonitored hypertension and diabetes. Mr. XYZ indicated at that time, they had not purchased any prescription medications or any of these health-related issues because of financial limitations. He still apparently is not under really good treatment for either of these conditions and on today's evaluation, he actually denies that he had diabetes. The impression was that the patient had axis IV diagnosis of chronic functional limitations, financial loss, and low losses with no axis III diagnosis. This was done by Rhonda Ackerman, Ph.D., a psychologist. It was also suggested at that time that the patient should quit smoking. Despite these evaluations, Mr. XYZ really did not get involved in psychotherapy and there was poor attendance of these visits, there was no clearance given for any surgical interventions and it was felt that the patient has benefited from the use of SSRIs. Of concern in June of 2006 was that the patient had still not stopped smoking despite warnings. His hypertension and diabetes were still not under good control and the patient was assessed at significant risk for additional health complications including stroke, reduced mental clarity, and future falls. It was felt that any surgical interventions should be put on hold at that time. In September of 2006, the patient was evaluated at Baylor College of Medicine in the Occupational Health Program. The evaluation was done by a physician at that time, whose report is clearly documented in the record. Evaluation was done by Dr. B. At present, Mr. XYZ continues on with his oxycodone and Norco. These were prescribed by Dr. A two and a half weeks ago and the patient states that he has enough medication left to last him for about another two and a half weeks. The patient states that there has been no recent change in either the severity or the distribution of his pain. He is unable to sleep because of pain and his activities of daily living are severely limited. He spends most of his day lying on the floor, watching TV and occasionally will walk a while. ***** from detailed questioning shows that his activities of daily living are practically zero. The patient denies smoking at this time. He denies alcohol use or aberrant drug use. He obtains no pain medications from no other sources. Review of MRI done on 02/10/06 shows laminectomies at L3 through S1 with bilateral posterior plates and pedicle screws with granulation tissue around the thecal sac and around the left L4-5 and S1 nerve roots, which appear to be retracted posteriorly. There is a small right posterior herniation at L1-L2.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, Significant for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The patient does not know what medications he is taking for diabetes and denies any diabetes. CABG in July of 2006 with no preoperative angina, shortness of breath, or myocardial infarction. History of depression, lumbar fusion surgery in 2000, left knee surgery 25 years ago.,SOCIAL HISTORY:, The patient is on disability. He does not smoke. He does not drink alcohol. He is single. He lives with a girlfriend. He has minimal activities of daily living. The patient cannot recollect when last a urine drug screen was done.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS:, No fevers, no headaches, chest pain, nausea, shortness of breath, or change in appetite. Depressive symptoms of crying and decreased self-worth have been noted in the past. No neurological history of strokes, epileptic seizures. Genitourinary negative. Gastrointestinal negative. Integumentary negative. Behavioral, depression.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:, The patient is short of hearing. His cognitive skills appear to be significantly impaired. The patient is oriented x3 to time and place. Weight 185 pounds, temperature 97.5, blood pressure 137/92, pulse 61. The patient is complaining of pain of a 9/10.,Musculoskeletal: The patient's gait is markedly antalgic with predominant weightbearing on the left leg. There is marked postural deviation to the left. Because of pain, the patient is unable to heel-toe or tandem gait. Examination of the neck and cervical spine are within normal limits. Range of motion of the elbow, shoulders are within normal limits. No muscle spasm or abnormal muscle movements noted in the neck and upper extremities. Head is normocephalic. Examination of the anterior neck is within normal limits. There is significant muscle wasting of the quadriceps and hamstrings on the left, as well as of the calf muscles. Skin is normal. Hair distribution normal. Skin temperature normal in both the upper and lower extremities. The lumbar spine curvature is markedly flattened. There is a well-healed central scar extending from T12 to L1. The patient exhibits numerous positive Waddell's signs on exam of the low back with inappropriate flinching and wincing with even the lightest touch on the paraspinal muscles. Examination of the paraspinal muscles show a mild to moderate degree of spasm with a significant degree of tenderness and guarding, worse on the left than the right. Range of motion testing of the lumbar spine is labored in all directions. It is interesting that the patient cannot flex more than 5 in the standing position, but is able to sit without any problem. There is a marked degree of sciatic notch tenderness on the left. No abnormal muscle spasms or muscle movements were noted. Patrick's test is negative bilaterally. There are no provocative facetal signs in either the left or right quadrants of the lumbar area. Neurological exam: Cranial nerves II through XII are within normal limits. Neurological exam of the upper extremities is within normal limits with good motor strength and normal biceps, triceps and brachioradialis reflexes. Neurological exam of the lower extremities shows a 2+ right patellar reflex and -1 on the left. There is no ankle clonus. Babinski is negative. Sensory testing shows a minimal degree of sensory loss on the right L5 distribution. Muscle testing shows decreased L4-L5 on the left with extensor hallucis longus +2/5. Ankle extensors are -3 on the left and +5 on the right. Dorsiflexors of the left ankle are +2 on the left and +5 on the right. Straight leg raising test is positive on the left at about 35 . There is no ankle clonus. Hoffman's test and Tinel's test are normal in the upper extremities.,Respiratory: Breath sounds normal. Trachea is midline.,Cardiovascular: Heart sounds normal. No gallops or murmurs heard. Carotid pulses present. No carotid bruits. Peripheral pulses are palpable.,Abdomen: Hernia site is intact. No hepatosplenomegaly. No masses. No areas of tenderness or guarding.,IMPRESSION:,1. Post-laminectomy low back syndrome.,2. Left L5-S1 radiculopathy.,3. Severe cognitive impairment with minimal ***** for rehabilitation or return to work.,4. Opioid dependence for pain control.,TREATMENT PLAN:, The patient will continue on with his medications prescribed by Dr. Chang and I will see him in two weeks' time and probably suggest switching over from OxyContin to methadone. I do not think this patient is a good candidate for spinal cord stimulation due to his grasp of exactly what is happening and his cognitive impairment. I will get a behavioral evaluation from Mr. Tom Welbeck and refer the patient for ongoing physical therapy. The prognosis here for any improvement or return to work is zero.

mr xyz forgot hearing aids home today severely hearing impaired interview conducted yelling top voice reasons really best circumstances curtail amount time spent trying get history physical effort required extracting information patient patient seen late filled patient questionnaire summarize history mr xyz clear events past sustained workrelated injury time time driving wheeler truck patient indicated slipped rear truck loading vehicles trailer experienced severe low back pain eventually short later underwent fusion ls patient uneventful hospital course surgery done somewhere florida surgeon remember able return usual occupation second workrelated injury may time required boat trucks rig also use chainpulley system raise lower vehicles mr xyz felt popping sound back excruciating low back pain transported nearest hospital mried time apparently showed reherniation ls disc somehow ended houston underwent fusion dr w l done initially fairly well able walk move around gradually pain reappeared started getting severe leftsided leg pain going lateral aspect left leg foot still complaining severe pain right tingling medial two toes foot significant weakness left leg patient referred dr pain management specialist dr maintained opioid medications consisting norco mg breakthrough pain oxycodone mg tid lunesta mg qhs sleep carisoprodol mg tid lyrica mg qdaily patient states experiencing side effects medications takes medications required apparently drug screened drug screening found normal patient underwent extensive behavioral evaluation tir rehab center time felt mr xyz showed degree moderate level depression indications evaluation mr xyz showed addictive noncompliant type behaviors felt time mr xyz would benefit brief period individual psychotherapy course psychotropic medications concern therapist time patients untreated unmonitored hypertension diabetes mr xyz indicated time purchased prescription medications healthrelated issues financial limitations still apparently really good treatment either conditions todays evaluation actually denies diabetes impression patient axis iv diagnosis chronic functional limitations financial loss low losses axis iii diagnosis done rhonda ackerman phd psychologist also suggested time patient quit smoking despite evaluations mr xyz really get involved psychotherapy poor attendance visits clearance given surgical interventions felt patient benefited use ssris concern june patient still stopped smoking despite warnings hypertension diabetes still good control patient assessed significant risk additional health complications including stroke reduced mental clarity future falls felt surgical interventions put hold time september patient evaluated baylor college medicine occupational health program evaluation done physician time whose report clearly documented record evaluation done dr b present mr xyz continues oxycodone norco prescribed dr two half weeks ago patient states enough medication left last another two half weeks patient states recent change either severity distribution pain unable sleep pain activities daily living severely limited spends day lying floor watching tv occasionally walk detailed questioning shows activities daily living practically zero patient denies smoking time denies alcohol use aberrant drug use obtains pain medications sources review mri done shows laminectomies l bilateral posterior plates pedicle screws granulation tissue around thecal sac around left l nerve roots appear retracted posteriorly small right posterior herniation llpast medical history significant hypertension hypercholesterolemia noninsulindependent diabetes mellitus patient know medications taking diabetes denies diabetes cabg july preoperative angina shortness breath myocardial infarction history depression lumbar fusion surgery left knee surgery years agosocial history patient disability smoke drink alcohol single lives girlfriend minimal activities daily living patient cannot recollect last urine drug screen donereview systems fevers headaches chest pain nausea shortness breath change appetite depressive symptoms crying decreased selfworth noted past neurological history strokes epileptic seizures genitourinary negative gastrointestinal negative integumentary negative behavioral depressionphysical examination patient short hearing cognitive skills appear significantly impaired patient oriented x time place weight pounds temperature blood pressure pulse patient complaining pain musculoskeletal patients gait markedly antalgic predominant weightbearing left leg marked postural deviation left pain patient unable heeltoe tandem gait examination neck cervical spine within normal limits range motion elbow shoulders within normal limits muscle spasm abnormal muscle movements noted neck upper extremities head normocephalic examination anterior neck within normal limits significant muscle wasting quadriceps hamstrings left well calf muscles skin normal hair distribution normal skin temperature normal upper lower extremities lumbar spine curvature markedly flattened wellhealed central scar extending l patient exhibits numerous positive waddells signs exam low back inappropriate flinching wincing even lightest touch paraspinal muscles examination paraspinal muscles show mild moderate degree spasm significant degree tenderness guarding worse left right range motion testing lumbar spine labored directions interesting patient cannot flex standing position able sit without problem marked degree sciatic notch tenderness left abnormal muscle spasms muscle movements noted patricks test negative bilaterally provocative facetal signs either left right quadrants lumbar area neurological exam cranial nerves ii xii within normal limits neurological exam upper extremities within normal limits good motor strength normal biceps triceps brachioradialis reflexes neurological exam lower extremities shows right patellar reflex left ankle clonus babinski negative sensory testing shows minimal degree sensory loss right l distribution muscle testing shows decreased left extensor hallucis longus ankle extensors left right dorsiflexors left ankle left right straight leg raising test positive left ankle clonus hoffmans test tinels test normal upper extremitiesrespiratory breath sounds normal trachea midlinecardiovascular heart sounds normal gallops murmurs heard carotid pulses present carotid bruits peripheral pulses palpableabdomen hernia site intact hepatosplenomegaly masses areas tenderness guardingimpression postlaminectomy low back syndrome left ls radiculopathy severe cognitive impairment minimal rehabilitation return work opioid dependence pain controltreatment plan patient continue medications prescribed dr chang see two weeks time probably suggest switching oxycontin methadone think patient good candidate spinal cord stimulation due grasp exactly happening cognitive impairment get behavioral evaluation mr tom welbeck refer patient ongoing physical therapy prognosis improvement return work zero

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: Mr. XYZ forgot his hearing aids at home today and is severely hearing impaired and most of the interview had to be conducted with me yelling at him at the top of my voice. For all these reasons, this was not really under the best circumstances and I had to curtail the amount of time I spent trying to get a history because of the physical effort required in extracting information from this patient. The patient was seen late because he had not filled in the patient questionnaire. To summarize the history here, Mr. XYZ who is not very clear on events from the past, sustained a work-related injury some time in 1998. At that time, he was driving an 18-wheeler truck. The patient indicated that he slipped off the rear of his truck while loading vehicles to his trailer. He experienced severe low back pain and eventually a short while later, underwent a fusion of L4-L5 and L5-S1. The patient had an uneventful hospital course from the surgery, which was done somewhere in Florida by a surgeon, who he does not remember. He was able to return to his usual occupation, but then again had a second work-related injury in May of 2005. At that time, he was required to boat trucks to his rig and also to use a chain-pulley system to raise and lower the vehicles. Mr. XYZ felt a popping sound in his back and had excruciating low back pain and had to be transported to the nearest hospital. He was MRI'ed at that time, which apparently showed a re-herniation of an L5-S1 disc and then, he somehow ended up in Houston, where he underwent fusion by Dr. W from L3 through S2. This was done on 12/15/2005. Initially, he did fairly well and was able to walk and move around, but then gradually the pain reappeared and he started getting severe left-sided leg pain going down the lateral aspect of the left leg into his foot. He is still complaining of the severe pain right now with tingling in the medial two toes of the foot and significant weakness in his left leg. The patient was referred to Dr. A, pain management specialist and Dr. A has maintained him on opioid medications consisting of Norco 10/325 mg for breakthrough pain and oxycodone 30 mg t.i.d. with Lunesta 3 mg q.h.s. for sleep, Carisoprodol 350 mg t.i.d., and Lyrica 100 mg q.daily. The patient states that he is experiencing no side effects from medications and takes medications as required. He has apparently been drug screened and his drug screening has been found to be normal. The patient underwent an extensive behavioral evaluation on 05/22/06 by TIR Rehab Center. At that time, it was felt that Mr. XYZ showed a degree of moderate level of depression. There were no indications in the evaluation that Mr. XYZ showed any addictive or noncompliant type behaviors. It was felt at that time that Mr. XYZ would benefit from a brief period of individual psychotherapy and a course of psychotropic medications. Of concern to the therapist at that time was the patient's untreated and unmonitored hypertension and diabetes. Mr. XYZ indicated at that time, they had not purchased any prescription medications or any of these health-related issues because of financial limitations. He still apparently is not under really good treatment for either of these conditions and on today's evaluation, he actually denies that he had diabetes. The impression was that the patient had axis IV diagnosis of chronic functional limitations, financial loss, and low losses with no axis III diagnosis. This was done by Rhonda Ackerman, Ph.D., a psychologist. It was also suggested at that time that the patient should quit smoking. Despite these evaluations, Mr. XYZ really did not get involved in psychotherapy and there was poor attendance of these visits, there was no clearance given for any surgical interventions and it was felt that the patient has benefited from the use of SSRIs. Of concern in June of 2006 was that the patient had still not stopped smoking despite warnings. His hypertension and diabetes were still not under good control and the patient was assessed at significant risk for additional health complications including stroke, reduced mental clarity, and future falls. It was felt that any surgical interventions should be put on hold at that time. In September of 2006, the patient was evaluated at Baylor College of Medicine in the Occupational Health Program. The evaluation was done by a physician at that time, whose report is clearly documented in the record. Evaluation was done by Dr. B. At present, Mr. XYZ continues on with his oxycodone and Norco. These were prescribed by Dr. A two and a half weeks ago and the patient states that he has enough medication left to last him for about another two and a half weeks. The patient states that there has been no recent change in either the severity or the distribution of his pain. He is unable to sleep because of pain and his activities of daily living are severely limited. He spends most of his day lying on the floor, watching TV and occasionally will walk a while. ***** from detailed questioning shows that his activities of daily living are practically zero. The patient denies smoking at this time. He denies alcohol use or aberrant drug use. He obtains no pain medications from no other sources. Review of MRI done on 02/10/06 shows laminectomies at L3 through S1 with bilateral posterior plates and pedicle screws with granulation tissue around the thecal sac and around the left L4-5 and S1 nerve roots, which appear to be retracted posteriorly. There is a small right posterior herniation at L1-L2.,PAST MEDICAL HISTORY:, Significant for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The patient does not know what medications he is taking for diabetes and denies any diabetes. CABG in July of 2006 with no preoperative angina, shortness of breath, or myocardial infarction. History of depression, lumbar fusion surgery in 2000, left knee surgery 25 years ago.,SOCIAL HISTORY:, The patient is on disability. He does not smoke. He does not drink alcohol. He is single. He lives with a girlfriend. He has minimal activities of daily living. The patient cannot recollect when last a urine drug screen was done.,REVIEW OF SYSTEMS:, No fevers, no headaches, chest pain, nausea, shortness of breath, or change in appetite. Depressive symptoms of crying and decreased self-worth have been noted in the past. No neurological history of strokes, epileptic seizures. Genitourinary negative. Gastrointestinal negative. Integumentary negative. Behavioral, depression.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:, The patient is short of hearing. His cognitive skills appear to be significantly impaired. The patient is oriented x3 to time and place. Weight 185 pounds, temperature 97.5, blood pressure 137/92, pulse 61. The patient is complaining of pain of a 9/10.,Musculoskeletal: The patient's gait is markedly antalgic with predominant weightbearing on the left leg. There is marked postural deviation to the left. Because of pain, the patient is unable to heel-toe or tandem gait. Examination of the neck and cervical spine are within normal limits. Range of motion of the elbow, shoulders are within normal limits. No muscle spasm or abnormal muscle movements noted in the neck and upper extremities. Head is normocephalic. Examination of the anterior neck is within normal limits. There is significant muscle wasting of the quadriceps and hamstrings on the left, as well as of the calf muscles. Skin is normal. Hair distribution normal. Skin temperature normal in both the upper and lower extremities. The lumbar spine curvature is markedly flattened. There is a well-healed central scar extending from T12 to L1. The patient exhibits numerous positive Waddell's signs on exam of the low back with inappropriate flinching and wincing with even the lightest touch on the paraspinal muscles. Examination of the paraspinal muscles show a mild to moderate degree of spasm with a significant degree of tenderness and guarding, worse on the left than the right. Range of motion testing of the lumbar spine is labored in all directions. It is interesting that the patient cannot flex more than 5 in the standing position, but is able to sit without any problem. There is a marked degree of sciatic notch tenderness on the left. No abnormal muscle spasms or muscle movements were noted. Patrick's test is negative bilaterally. There are no provocative facetal signs in either the left or right quadrants of the lumbar area. Neurological exam: Cranial nerves II through XII are within normal limits. Neurological exam of the upper extremities is within normal limits with good motor strength and normal biceps, triceps and brachioradialis reflexes. Neurological exam of the lower extremities shows a 2+ right patellar reflex and -1 on the left. There is no ankle clonus. Babinski is negative. Sensory testing shows a minimal degree of sensory loss on the right L5 distribution. Muscle testing shows decreased L4-L5 on the left with extensor hallucis longus +2/5. Ankle extensors are -3 on the left and +5 on the right. Dorsiflexors of the left ankle are +2 on the left and +5 on the right. Straight leg raising test is positive on the left at about 35 . There is no ankle clonus. Hoffman's test and Tinel's test are normal in the upper extremities.,Respiratory: Breath sounds normal. Trachea is midline.,Cardiovascular: Heart sounds normal. No gallops or murmurs heard. Carotid pulses present. No carotid bruits. Peripheral pulses are palpable.,Abdomen: Hernia site is intact. No hepatosplenomegaly. No masses. No areas of tenderness or guarding.,IMPRESSION:,1. Post-laminectomy low back syndrome.,2. Left L5-S1 radiculopathy.,3. Severe cognitive impairment with minimal ***** for rehabilitation or return to work.,4. Opioid dependence for pain control.,TREATMENT PLAN:, The patient will continue on with his medications prescribed by Dr. Chang and I will see him in two weeks' time and probably suggest switching over from OxyContin to methadone. I do not think this patient is a good candidate for spinal cord stimulation due to his grasp of exactly what is happening and his cognitive impairment. I will get a behavioral evaluation from Mr. Tom Welbeck and refer the patient for ongoing physical therapy. The prognosis here for any improvement or return to work is zero. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., Orthopedic

NAME OF PROCEDURE,1. Left heart catheterization with left ventriculography and selective coronary angiography.,2. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stent placement of the right coronary artery.,HISTORY: , This is a 58-year-old male who presented with atypical chest discomfort. The patient had elevated troponins which were suggestive of a myocardial infarction. The patient is suspected of having significant obstructive coronary artery disease, therefore he is undergoing cardiac catheterization.,PROCEDURE DETAILS: , Informed consent was given prior to the patient was brought to the catheterization laboratory. The patient was brought to the catheterization laboratory in postabsorptive state. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion, 2% Xylocaine solution was used to anesthetize the right femoral region. Using modified Seldinger technique, a 6-French arterial sheath was placed. Then, the patient had already been on heparin. Then, a Judkins left 4 catheter was intubated into the left main coronary artery. Several projections were obtained and the catheter was removed. A 3DRC catheter was intubated into the right coronary artery. Several projections were obtained and the catheter was removed. Then, a 3DRC guiding catheter was intubated into the right coronary artery. Then, a universal wire was advanced across the lesion into the distal right coronary artery. Integrilin was given. Then, a 3.0 x 12 Voyager balloon was inflated at 13 atmospheres for 30 seconds. Then, a projection was obtained. Then, a 3.0 x 15 Vision stent was placed into the distal right coronary artery. The stent was deployed at 15 atmospheres for 25 seconds. Post stent, the patient was given intracoronary nitroglycerin after one projection. Then, there was an attempt to place the intervention wire across the third posterolateral branch which was partially obstructed and this was not successful. Then, a pilot 150 wire was advanced across the lesion. Then, attempt to place the 2.0 x 8 power saver across the lesion was performed. However, it was felt that there was adequate flow and no further intervention needed to be performed. Then, the stent delivery system was removed. A pigtail catheter was placed into the left ventricle. Hemodynamics followed by left ventriculography was performed. Then, a pullback gradient was performed and the catheter was removed. Then, the right femoral artery was visualized and using angiography and then an Angio-Seal was applied. The patient was transferred back to his room in good condition.,FINDINGS,1. Hemodynamics: The opening aortic pressure was 116/61 with a mean of 64. The opening left ventricular pressure was 112 with end-diastolic pressure of 23. LV pressure on pullback was 106 with end-diastolic pressure of 21. Aortic pressure was 111/67 with a mean of 87. The closing pressure was 110/67.,2. Left ventriculography: The left ventricle was of normal cavity, size, and wall thickness. There is a mild anterolateral hypokinesis and moderate inferior and inferoapical hypokinesis. The overall systolic function appeared to be mildly reduced with ejection fraction between 40% and 45%. The mitral valve had no significant prolapse or regurgitation. The aortic valve appeared to be trileaflet and moved normally.,3. Coronary angiography: The left main is a normal-caliber vessel. This bifurcates into the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries. The left main is free of any significant obstructive coronary artery disease. The left anterior descending is a large vessel that extends to the apex. It gives off approximately 10 septal perforators and 5 diagonal branches. The first diagonal branch was large. The left anterior descending had mild irregularities, but no high-grade disease. The left circumflex is a nondominant vessel, which gives rise to two obtuse marginal branches. The two obtuse marginal branches are large. There is a relatively small left atrial branch. The left circumflex had a 50% stenosis after the first obtuse marginal branch. The rest of the vessel is moderately irregular, but no high-grade disease. The right coronary artery appears to be a dominant vessel, which gives rise to three right ventricular branches, four posterior lateral branches, two right atrial branches, and two small conus branches. The right coronary artery had moderate disease in its proximal segment with multiple areas of plaquing but no high-grade disease. However, distal between the second and third posterolateral branch, there is a 90% stenosis. The rest of the vessels had mild irregularities, but no high-grade disease. Then percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the right coronary artery resulted in a 20% residual stenosis. Then, after stent placement there was 0% residual stenosis; however, there was partial occlusion of the third posterolateral branch. Then, a wire was advanced through this and there was improvement of flow. There is improvement from TIMI grade 2 to TIMI grade 3 flow.,CLINICAL IMPRESSION,1. Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement of the right coronary artery.,2. Two-vessel coronary artery disease.,3. Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.,4. Mild anterolateral and moderate inferoapical hypokinesis.,RECOMMENDATIONS,1. Integrilin.,2. Bed rest.,3. Risk factor modification.,4. Thallium scintigraphy in approximately six weeks.

name procedure left heart catheterization left ventriculography selective coronary angiography percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty stent placement right coronary arteryhistory yearold male presented atypical chest discomfort patient elevated troponins suggestive myocardial infarction patient suspected significant obstructive coronary artery disease therefore undergoing cardiac catheterizationprocedure details informed consent given prior patient brought catheterization laboratory patient brought catheterization laboratory postabsorptive state patient prepped draped usual sterile fashion xylocaine solution used anesthetize right femoral region using modified seldinger technique french arterial sheath placed patient already heparin judkins left catheter intubated left main coronary artery several projections obtained catheter removed drc catheter intubated right coronary artery several projections obtained catheter removed drc guiding catheter intubated right coronary artery universal wire advanced across lesion distal right coronary artery integrilin given x voyager balloon inflated atmospheres seconds projection obtained x vision stent placed distal right coronary artery stent deployed atmospheres seconds post stent patient given intracoronary nitroglycerin one projection attempt place intervention wire across third posterolateral branch partially obstructed successful pilot wire advanced across lesion attempt place x power saver across lesion performed however felt adequate flow intervention needed performed stent delivery system removed pigtail catheter placed left ventricle hemodynamics followed left ventriculography performed pullback gradient performed catheter removed right femoral artery visualized using angiography angioseal applied patient transferred back room good conditionfindings hemodynamics opening aortic pressure mean opening left ventricular pressure enddiastolic pressure lv pressure pullback enddiastolic pressure aortic pressure mean closing pressure left ventriculography left ventricle normal cavity size wall thickness mild anterolateral hypokinesis moderate inferior inferoapical hypokinesis overall systolic function appeared mildly reduced ejection fraction mitral valve significant prolapse regurgitation aortic valve appeared trileaflet moved normally coronary angiography left main normalcaliber vessel bifurcates left anterior descending circumflex arteries left main free significant obstructive coronary artery disease left anterior descending large vessel extends apex gives approximately septal perforators diagonal branches first diagonal branch large left anterior descending mild irregularities highgrade disease left circumflex nondominant vessel gives rise two obtuse marginal branches two obtuse marginal branches large relatively small left atrial branch left circumflex stenosis first obtuse marginal branch rest vessel moderately irregular highgrade disease right coronary artery appears dominant vessel gives rise three right ventricular branches four posterior lateral branches two right atrial branches two small conus branches right coronary artery moderate disease proximal segment multiple areas plaquing highgrade disease however distal second third posterolateral branch stenosis rest vessels mild irregularities highgrade disease percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty right coronary artery resulted residual stenosis stent placement residual stenosis however partial occlusion third posterolateral branch wire advanced improvement flow improvement timi grade timi grade flowclinical impression successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty stent placement right coronary artery twovessel coronary artery disease elevated left ventricular enddiastolic pressure mild anterolateral moderate inferoapical hypokinesisrecommendations integrilin bed rest risk factor modification thallium scintigraphy approximately six weeks

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NAME OF PROCEDURE,1. Left heart catheterization with left ventriculography and selective coronary angiography.,2. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stent placement of the right coronary artery.,HISTORY: , This is a 58-year-old male who presented with atypical chest discomfort. The patient had elevated troponins which were suggestive of a myocardial infarction. The patient is suspected of having significant obstructive coronary artery disease, therefore he is undergoing cardiac catheterization.,PROCEDURE DETAILS: , Informed consent was given prior to the patient was brought to the catheterization laboratory. The patient was brought to the catheterization laboratory in postabsorptive state. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion, 2% Xylocaine solution was used to anesthetize the right femoral region. Using modified Seldinger technique, a 6-French arterial sheath was placed. Then, the patient had already been on heparin. Then, a Judkins left 4 catheter was intubated into the left main coronary artery. Several projections were obtained and the catheter was removed. A 3DRC catheter was intubated into the right coronary artery. Several projections were obtained and the catheter was removed. Then, a 3DRC guiding catheter was intubated into the right coronary artery. Then, a universal wire was advanced across the lesion into the distal right coronary artery. Integrilin was given. Then, a 3.0 x 12 Voyager balloon was inflated at 13 atmospheres for 30 seconds. Then, a projection was obtained. Then, a 3.0 x 15 Vision stent was placed into the distal right coronary artery. The stent was deployed at 15 atmospheres for 25 seconds. Post stent, the patient was given intracoronary nitroglycerin after one projection. Then, there was an attempt to place the intervention wire across the third posterolateral branch which was partially obstructed and this was not successful. Then, a pilot 150 wire was advanced across the lesion. Then, attempt to place the 2.0 x 8 power saver across the lesion was performed. However, it was felt that there was adequate flow and no further intervention needed to be performed. Then, the stent delivery system was removed. A pigtail catheter was placed into the left ventricle. Hemodynamics followed by left ventriculography was performed. Then, a pullback gradient was performed and the catheter was removed. Then, the right femoral artery was visualized and using angiography and then an Angio-Seal was applied. The patient was transferred back to his room in good condition.,FINDINGS,1. Hemodynamics: The opening aortic pressure was 116/61 with a mean of 64. The opening left ventricular pressure was 112 with end-diastolic pressure of 23. LV pressure on pullback was 106 with end-diastolic pressure of 21. Aortic pressure was 111/67 with a mean of 87. The closing pressure was 110/67.,2. Left ventriculography: The left ventricle was of normal cavity, size, and wall thickness. There is a mild anterolateral hypokinesis and moderate inferior and inferoapical hypokinesis. The overall systolic function appeared to be mildly reduced with ejection fraction between 40% and 45%. The mitral valve had no significant prolapse or regurgitation. The aortic valve appeared to be trileaflet and moved normally.,3. Coronary angiography: The left main is a normal-caliber vessel. This bifurcates into the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries. The left main is free of any significant obstructive coronary artery disease. The left anterior descending is a large vessel that extends to the apex. It gives off approximately 10 septal perforators and 5 diagonal branches. The first diagonal branch was large. The left anterior descending had mild irregularities, but no high-grade disease. The left circumflex is a nondominant vessel, which gives rise to two obtuse marginal branches. The two obtuse marginal branches are large. There is a relatively small left atrial branch. The left circumflex had a 50% stenosis after the first obtuse marginal branch. The rest of the vessel is moderately irregular, but no high-grade disease. The right coronary artery appears to be a dominant vessel, which gives rise to three right ventricular branches, four posterior lateral branches, two right atrial branches, and two small conus branches. The right coronary artery had moderate disease in its proximal segment with multiple areas of plaquing but no high-grade disease. However, distal between the second and third posterolateral branch, there is a 90% stenosis. The rest of the vessels had mild irregularities, but no high-grade disease. Then percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the right coronary artery resulted in a 20% residual stenosis. Then, after stent placement there was 0% residual stenosis; however, there was partial occlusion of the third posterolateral branch. Then, a wire was advanced through this and there was improvement of flow. There is improvement from TIMI grade 2 to TIMI grade 3 flow.,CLINICAL IMPRESSION,1. Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement of the right coronary artery.,2. Two-vessel coronary artery disease.,3. Elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.,4. Mild anterolateral and moderate inferoapical hypokinesis.,RECOMMENDATIONS,1. Integrilin.,2. Bed rest.,3. Risk factor modification.,4. Thallium scintigraphy in approximately six weeks. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

NAME OF PROCEDURE,1. Selective coronary angiography.,2. Placement of overlapping 3.0 x 18 and 3.0 x 8 mm Xience stents in the proximal right coronary artery.,3. Abdominal aortography.,INDICATIONS: ,The patient is a 65-year-old gentleman with a history of exertional dyspnea and a cramping-like chest pain. Thallium scan has been negative. He is undergoing angiography to determine if his symptoms are due to coronary artery disease.,NARRATIVE: ,The right groin was sterilely prepped and draped in the usual fashion and the area of the right coronary artery anesthetized with 2% lidocaine. Constant sedation was obtained using Versed 1 mg and fentanyl 50 mcg. Received additional Versed and fentanyl during the procedure. Please refer to the nurses' notes for dosages and timing.,The right femoral artery was entered and a 4-French sheath was placed. Advancement of the guidewire demonstrated some obstruction at the level of abdominal aorta. Via the right Judkins catheter, the guidewire was easily infiltrated to the thoracic aorta and over aortic arch. The right Judkins catheter was advanced to the origin of the right coronary artery where selective angiograms were performed. This revealed a very high-grade lesion at the proximal right coronary artery. This catheter was exchanged for a left #4 Judkins catheter which was advanced to the ostium of the left main coronary artery where selective angiograms were performed.,The patient was found to have the above mentioned high-grade lesion in the right coronary artery and a coronary intervention was performed. A 6-French sheath and a right Judkins guide was placed. The patient was started on bivalarudin. A BMW wire was easily placed across the lesion and into the distal right coronary artery. A 3.0 x 15 mm Voyager balloon was placed and deployed at 10 atmospheres. The intermediate result was improved with TIMI-3 flow to the terminus of the vessel. Following this, a 3.0 x 18 mm Xience stent was placed across the lesion and deployed at 17 atmospheres. This revealed excellent result however at the very distal of the stent there was an area of haziness but no definite dissection. This was stented with a 3.0 x 8 mm Xience stent deployed again at 17 atmospheres. Final angiograms revealed excellent result with TIMI-3 flow at the terminus of the right coronary artery and approximately 10% residual stenosis at the worst point of the narrowing. The guiding catheter was withdrawn over wire and a pigtail was placed. This was advanced to the abdominal aorta at the area of obstruction and small injection of contrast was given demonstrating that there was a small aneurysm versus a small retrograde dissection in that area with some dye hang up after injection. The catheter was removed. The bivalarudin was stopped at the termination of procedure. A small injection of contrast given through arterial sheath and Angio-Seal was placed without incident.,It should also be noted that an 8-French sheath was placed in the right femoral vein. This was placed initially as the patient was going to have a right heart catheterization as well because of the dyspnea.,Total contrast media, 205 mL, total fluoroscopy time was 7.5 minutes, X-ray dose, 2666 milligray.,HEMODYNAMICS: , Rhythm was sinus throughout the procedure. Aortic pressure was 170/81 mmHg.,The right coronary artery is a dominant vessel. This vessel gives rise to conus branch and two small RV free wall branches and PDA and a small left ventricular branch. It should be noted that there was competitive flow in the posterior left ventricular branch and that the distal right coronary artery fills via left sided collaterals. In the proximal right coronary artery, there is a large ulcerative plaque followed immediately by a severe stenosis that is subtotal in severity. After intervention, there is TIMI-3 flow to the terminus of the right coronary with better fill into the distal right coronary artery and loss of competitive flow. There was approximately 10% residual stenosis at the worst part of the previous stenosis.,The left main is without disease and trifurcates into a moderate-sized ramus intermedius, the LAD and the circumflex. The ramus intermedius is free of disease. The LAD terminates at the LV apex and has elongated area of mild stenosis at its mid segment. This measures 25% to 30% at its worst point. The circumflex is a large caliber vessel. There is a proximal 15% to 20% stenosis and an area of ectasia in the proximal circumflex. Distally, this circumflex gives rise to a large bifurcating marginal artery and beyond that point, the circumflex is a small vessel within the AV groove.,The aortogram demonstrates eccentric aneurysm formation. This may represent a small retrograde dissection as well. There was some dye hang up in the wall.,IMPRESSION,1. Successful stenting of subtotal stenosis of the proximal coronary artery.,2. Non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the mid left anterior descending as described above and ectasia of the proximal circumflex coronary artery.,3. Left to right collateral filling noted prior to coronary intervention.,4. Small area of eccentric aneurysm formation in the abdominal aorta.

name procedure selective coronary angiography placement overlapping x x mm xience stents proximal right coronary artery abdominal aortographyindications patient yearold gentleman history exertional dyspnea crampinglike chest pain thallium scan negative undergoing angiography determine symptoms due coronary artery diseasenarrative right groin sterilely prepped draped usual fashion area right coronary artery anesthetized lidocaine constant sedation obtained using versed mg fentanyl mcg received additional versed fentanyl procedure please refer nurses notes dosages timingthe right femoral artery entered french sheath placed advancement guidewire demonstrated obstruction level abdominal aorta via right judkins catheter guidewire easily infiltrated thoracic aorta aortic arch right judkins catheter advanced origin right coronary artery selective angiograms performed revealed highgrade lesion proximal right coronary artery catheter exchanged left judkins catheter advanced ostium left main coronary artery selective angiograms performedthe patient found mentioned highgrade lesion right coronary artery coronary intervention performed french sheath right judkins guide placed patient started bivalarudin bmw wire easily placed across lesion distal right coronary artery x mm voyager balloon placed deployed atmospheres intermediate result improved timi flow terminus vessel following x mm xience stent placed across lesion deployed atmospheres revealed excellent result however distal stent area haziness definite dissection stented x mm xience stent deployed atmospheres final angiograms revealed excellent result timi flow terminus right coronary artery approximately residual stenosis worst point narrowing guiding catheter withdrawn wire pigtail placed advanced abdominal aorta area obstruction small injection contrast given demonstrating small aneurysm versus small retrograde dissection area dye hang injection catheter removed bivalarudin stopped termination procedure small injection contrast given arterial sheath angioseal placed without incidentit also noted french sheath placed right femoral vein placed initially patient going right heart catheterization well dyspneatotal contrast media ml total fluoroscopy time minutes xray dose milligrayhemodynamics rhythm sinus throughout procedure aortic pressure mmhgthe right coronary artery dominant vessel vessel gives rise conus branch two small rv free wall branches pda small left ventricular branch noted competitive flow posterior left ventricular branch distal right coronary artery fills via left sided collaterals proximal right coronary artery large ulcerative plaque followed immediately severe stenosis subtotal severity intervention timi flow terminus right coronary better fill distal right coronary artery loss competitive flow approximately residual stenosis worst part previous stenosisthe left main without disease trifurcates moderatesized ramus intermedius lad circumflex ramus intermedius free disease lad terminates lv apex elongated area mild stenosis mid segment measures worst point circumflex large caliber vessel proximal stenosis area ectasia proximal circumflex distally circumflex gives rise large bifurcating marginal artery beyond point circumflex small vessel within av groovethe aortogram demonstrates eccentric aneurysm formation may represent small retrograde dissection well dye hang wallimpression successful stenting subtotal stenosis proximal coronary artery nonobstructive coronary artery disease mid left anterior descending described ectasia proximal circumflex coronary artery left right collateral filling noted prior coronary intervention small area eccentric aneurysm formation abdominal aorta

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NAME OF PROCEDURE,1. Selective coronary angiography.,2. Placement of overlapping 3.0 x 18 and 3.0 x 8 mm Xience stents in the proximal right coronary artery.,3. Abdominal aortography.,INDICATIONS: ,The patient is a 65-year-old gentleman with a history of exertional dyspnea and a cramping-like chest pain. Thallium scan has been negative. He is undergoing angiography to determine if his symptoms are due to coronary artery disease.,NARRATIVE: ,The right groin was sterilely prepped and draped in the usual fashion and the area of the right coronary artery anesthetized with 2% lidocaine. Constant sedation was obtained using Versed 1 mg and fentanyl 50 mcg. Received additional Versed and fentanyl during the procedure. Please refer to the nurses' notes for dosages and timing.,The right femoral artery was entered and a 4-French sheath was placed. Advancement of the guidewire demonstrated some obstruction at the level of abdominal aorta. Via the right Judkins catheter, the guidewire was easily infiltrated to the thoracic aorta and over aortic arch. The right Judkins catheter was advanced to the origin of the right coronary artery where selective angiograms were performed. This revealed a very high-grade lesion at the proximal right coronary artery. This catheter was exchanged for a left #4 Judkins catheter which was advanced to the ostium of the left main coronary artery where selective angiograms were performed.,The patient was found to have the above mentioned high-grade lesion in the right coronary artery and a coronary intervention was performed. A 6-French sheath and a right Judkins guide was placed. The patient was started on bivalarudin. A BMW wire was easily placed across the lesion and into the distal right coronary artery. A 3.0 x 15 mm Voyager balloon was placed and deployed at 10 atmospheres. The intermediate result was improved with TIMI-3 flow to the terminus of the vessel. Following this, a 3.0 x 18 mm Xience stent was placed across the lesion and deployed at 17 atmospheres. This revealed excellent result however at the very distal of the stent there was an area of haziness but no definite dissection. This was stented with a 3.0 x 8 mm Xience stent deployed again at 17 atmospheres. Final angiograms revealed excellent result with TIMI-3 flow at the terminus of the right coronary artery and approximately 10% residual stenosis at the worst point of the narrowing. The guiding catheter was withdrawn over wire and a pigtail was placed. This was advanced to the abdominal aorta at the area of obstruction and small injection of contrast was given demonstrating that there was a small aneurysm versus a small retrograde dissection in that area with some dye hang up after injection. The catheter was removed. The bivalarudin was stopped at the termination of procedure. A small injection of contrast given through arterial sheath and Angio-Seal was placed without incident.,It should also be noted that an 8-French sheath was placed in the right femoral vein. This was placed initially as the patient was going to have a right heart catheterization as well because of the dyspnea.,Total contrast media, 205 mL, total fluoroscopy time was 7.5 minutes, X-ray dose, 2666 milligray.,HEMODYNAMICS: , Rhythm was sinus throughout the procedure. Aortic pressure was 170/81 mmHg.,The right coronary artery is a dominant vessel. This vessel gives rise to conus branch and two small RV free wall branches and PDA and a small left ventricular branch. It should be noted that there was competitive flow in the posterior left ventricular branch and that the distal right coronary artery fills via left sided collaterals. In the proximal right coronary artery, there is a large ulcerative plaque followed immediately by a severe stenosis that is subtotal in severity. After intervention, there is TIMI-3 flow to the terminus of the right coronary with better fill into the distal right coronary artery and loss of competitive flow. There was approximately 10% residual stenosis at the worst part of the previous stenosis.,The left main is without disease and trifurcates into a moderate-sized ramus intermedius, the LAD and the circumflex. The ramus intermedius is free of disease. The LAD terminates at the LV apex and has elongated area of mild stenosis at its mid segment. This measures 25% to 30% at its worst point. The circumflex is a large caliber vessel. There is a proximal 15% to 20% stenosis and an area of ectasia in the proximal circumflex. Distally, this circumflex gives rise to a large bifurcating marginal artery and beyond that point, the circumflex is a small vessel within the AV groove.,The aortogram demonstrates eccentric aneurysm formation. This may represent a small retrograde dissection as well. There was some dye hang up in the wall.,IMPRESSION,1. Successful stenting of subtotal stenosis of the proximal coronary artery.,2. Non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the mid left anterior descending as described above and ectasia of the proximal circumflex coronary artery.,3. Left to right collateral filling noted prior to coronary intervention.,4. Small area of eccentric aneurysm formation in the abdominal aorta. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

NAME OF PROCEDURE: , Celiac plexus block.,ANESTHESIA:, Local/IV sedation.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,PROCEDURE: , INT was placed. The patient was in the prone position back prepped and draped in sterile fashion. Then 1.5% of Lidocaine for skin wheal was made approximately 10 cm lateral to the L1-L2 vertebral junction. A 20 gauge, 15 cm needle was then placed in a cephalad medial 45o direction; the tip of the needle was just inside the L1 vertebral body. On lateral view, this was noted to be approximately 1.5-2.5 cm anterior to the vertebral body. At this time, 3 cc of Omnipaque dye was injected to the opposite side where the same sequence was performed. Following this, a mixture of 18 cc of 0.5% Marcaine was injected on each side Neosporin and band-aids was applied over the puncture sites. The patient was taken to the outpatient recovery where blood pressure was monitored and fluids given as needed. The patient was discharged to operating room recovery in stable condition.

name procedure celiac plexus blockanesthesia localiv sedationcomplications noneprocedure int placed patient prone position back prepped draped sterile fashion lidocaine skin wheal made approximately cm lateral vertebral junction gauge cm needle placed cephalad medial direction tip needle inside l vertebral body lateral view noted approximately cm anterior vertebral body time cc omnipaque dye injected opposite side sequence performed following mixture cc marcaine injected side neosporin bandaids applied puncture sites patient taken outpatient recovery blood pressure monitored fluids given needed patient discharged operating room recovery stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NAME OF PROCEDURE: , Celiac plexus block.,ANESTHESIA:, Local/IV sedation.,COMPLICATIONS:, None.,PROCEDURE: , INT was placed. The patient was in the prone position back prepped and draped in sterile fashion. Then 1.5% of Lidocaine for skin wheal was made approximately 10 cm lateral to the L1-L2 vertebral junction. A 20 gauge, 15 cm needle was then placed in a cephalad medial 45o direction; the tip of the needle was just inside the L1 vertebral body. On lateral view, this was noted to be approximately 1.5-2.5 cm anterior to the vertebral body. At this time, 3 cc of Omnipaque dye was injected to the opposite side where the same sequence was performed. Following this, a mixture of 18 cc of 0.5% Marcaine was injected on each side Neosporin and band-aids was applied over the puncture sites. The patient was taken to the outpatient recovery where blood pressure was monitored and fluids given as needed. The patient was discharged to operating room recovery in stable condition. ### Response: Pain Management

NAME OF PROCEDURE: , Left heart catheterization with ventriculography, selective coronary angiography.,INDICATIONS: , Acute coronary syndrome.,TECHNIQUE OF PROCEDURE: , Standard Judkins, right groin. Catheters used were a 6 French pigtail, 6 French JL4, 6 French JR4. ,ANTICOAGULATION: ,The patient was on heparin at the time.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,I reviewed with the patient the pros, cons, alternatives, risks of catheterization and sedation including myocardial infarction, stroke, death, damage to nerve, artery or vein in the leg, perforation of a cardiac chamber, dissection of an artery requiring countershock, infection, bleeding, ATN allergy, need for cardiac surgery. All questions were answered, and the patient desired to proceed.,HEMODYNAMIC DATA: ,Aortic pressure was in the physiologic range. No significant gradient across the aortic valve.,ANGIOGRAPHIC DATA,1. Ventriculogram: The left ventricle is of normal size and shape, normal wall motion, normal ejection fraction.,2. Right coronary artery: Dominant. There was insignificant disease in the system.,3. Left coronary: Left main, left anterior descending and circumflex systems showed no significant disease.,CONCLUSIONS,1. Normal left ventricular systolic function.,2. Insignificant coronary disease.,PLAN: , Based upon this study, medical therapy is warranted. Six-French Angio-Seal was used in the groin.

name procedure left heart catheterization ventriculography selective coronary angiographyindications acute coronary syndrometechnique procedure standard judkins right groin catheters used french pigtail french jl french jr anticoagulation patient heparin timecomplications nonei reviewed patient pros cons alternatives risks catheterization sedation including myocardial infarction stroke death damage nerve artery vein leg perforation cardiac chamber dissection artery requiring countershock infection bleeding atn allergy need cardiac surgery questions answered patient desired proceedhemodynamic data aortic pressure physiologic range significant gradient across aortic valveangiographic data ventriculogram left ventricle normal size shape normal wall motion normal ejection fraction right coronary artery dominant insignificant disease system left coronary left main left anterior descending circumflex systems showed significant diseaseconclusions normal left ventricular systolic function insignificant coronary diseaseplan based upon study medical therapy warranted sixfrench angioseal used groin

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NAME OF PROCEDURE: , Left heart catheterization with ventriculography, selective coronary angiography.,INDICATIONS: , Acute coronary syndrome.,TECHNIQUE OF PROCEDURE: , Standard Judkins, right groin. Catheters used were a 6 French pigtail, 6 French JL4, 6 French JR4. ,ANTICOAGULATION: ,The patient was on heparin at the time.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,I reviewed with the patient the pros, cons, alternatives, risks of catheterization and sedation including myocardial infarction, stroke, death, damage to nerve, artery or vein in the leg, perforation of a cardiac chamber, dissection of an artery requiring countershock, infection, bleeding, ATN allergy, need for cardiac surgery. All questions were answered, and the patient desired to proceed.,HEMODYNAMIC DATA: ,Aortic pressure was in the physiologic range. No significant gradient across the aortic valve.,ANGIOGRAPHIC DATA,1. Ventriculogram: The left ventricle is of normal size and shape, normal wall motion, normal ejection fraction.,2. Right coronary artery: Dominant. There was insignificant disease in the system.,3. Left coronary: Left main, left anterior descending and circumflex systems showed no significant disease.,CONCLUSIONS,1. Normal left ventricular systolic function.,2. Insignificant coronary disease.,PLAN: , Based upon this study, medical therapy is warranted. Six-French Angio-Seal was used in the groin. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

NAME OF PROCEDURE: , Left heart catheterization with ventriculography, selective coronary arteriographies, successful stenting of the left anterior descending diagonal.,INDICATION:, Recurrent angina. History of coronary disease.,TECHNICAL PROCEDURE: , Standard Judkins, right groin.,CATHETERS USED:, 6-French pigtail, 6-French JL4, 6-French JR4.,ANTICOAGULATION: , 2000 of heparin, 300 of Plavix, was begun on Integrilin.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,STENT: , For stenting we used a 6-French left Judkins guide. Stent was a 275 x 13 Zeta.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , I reviewed with the patient the pros, cons, alternatives and risks of catheterization and sedation including myocardial infarction, stroke, death, damage to nerve, artery or vein in the leg, perforation of cardiac chamber, resection of an artery, arrhythmia requiring countershock, infection, bleeding, allergy, and need for vascular surgery. All questions were answered and the patient decided to proceed.,HEMODYNAMIC DATA: , Aortic pressure was within physiologic range. There was no significant gradient across the aortic valve.,ANGIOGRAPHIC DATA,1. Ventriculogram: Left ventricle was of normal size and shape with normal wall motion, normal ejection fraction.,2. Right coronary artery: Dominant. There was a lesion in the proximal portion in the 60% range, insignificant disease distally.,3. Left coronary artery: The left main coronary artery showed insignificant disease. The circumflex arose, showed about 30% proximally. Left anterior descending arose and the previously placed stent was perfectly patent. There was a large diagonal branch which showed 90% stenosis in its proximal portion. There was a lesion in the 30% to 40% range even more proximal.,I reviewed with the patient the options of medical therapy, intervention on the culprit versus bypass surgery. He desired that we intervene.,Successful stenting of the left anterior descending, diagonal. The guide was placed in the left main. We easily crossed the lesion in the diagonal branch of the left anterior descending. We advanced, applied and post-dilated the 275 x 13 stent. Final angiography showed 0% residual at the site of previous 90% stenosis. The more proximal 30% to 40% lesion was unchanged.,CONCLUSION,1. Successful stenting of the left anterior descending/diagonal. Initially there was 90% in the diagonal after stenting. There was 0% residual. There was a lesion a bit more proximal in the 40% range.,2. Left anterior descending stent remains patent.,3. 30% in the circumflex.,4. 60% in the right coronary.,5. Ejection fraction and wall motion are normal.,PLAN: , We have stented the culprit lesion. The patient will receive a course of aspirin, Plavix, Integrilin, and statin therapy. We used 6-French Angio-Seal in the groin. All questions have been answered. I have discussed the possibility of restenosis, need for further procedures.

name procedure left heart catheterization ventriculography selective coronary arteriographies successful stenting left anterior descending diagonalindication recurrent angina history coronary diseasetechnical procedure standard judkins right groincatheters used french pigtail french jl french jranticoagulation heparin plavix begun integrilincomplications nonestent stenting used french left judkins guide stent x zetadescription procedure reviewed patient pros cons alternatives risks catheterization sedation including myocardial infarction stroke death damage nerve artery vein leg perforation cardiac chamber resection artery arrhythmia requiring countershock infection bleeding allergy need vascular surgery questions answered patient decided proceedhemodynamic data aortic pressure within physiologic range significant gradient across aortic valveangiographic data ventriculogram left ventricle normal size shape normal wall motion normal ejection fraction right coronary artery dominant lesion proximal portion range insignificant disease distally left coronary artery left main coronary artery showed insignificant disease circumflex arose showed proximally left anterior descending arose previously placed stent perfectly patent large diagonal branch showed stenosis proximal portion lesion range even proximali reviewed patient options medical therapy intervention culprit versus bypass surgery desired intervenesuccessful stenting left anterior descending diagonal guide placed left main easily crossed lesion diagonal branch left anterior descending advanced applied postdilated x stent final angiography showed residual site previous stenosis proximal lesion unchangedconclusion successful stenting left anterior descendingdiagonal initially diagonal stenting residual lesion bit proximal range left anterior descending stent remains patent circumflex right coronary ejection fraction wall motion normalplan stented culprit lesion patient receive course aspirin plavix integrilin statin therapy used french angioseal groin questions answered discussed possibility restenosis need procedures

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NAME OF PROCEDURE: , Left heart catheterization with ventriculography, selective coronary arteriographies, successful stenting of the left anterior descending diagonal.,INDICATION:, Recurrent angina. History of coronary disease.,TECHNICAL PROCEDURE: , Standard Judkins, right groin.,CATHETERS USED:, 6-French pigtail, 6-French JL4, 6-French JR4.,ANTICOAGULATION: , 2000 of heparin, 300 of Plavix, was begun on Integrilin.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,STENT: , For stenting we used a 6-French left Judkins guide. Stent was a 275 x 13 Zeta.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: , I reviewed with the patient the pros, cons, alternatives and risks of catheterization and sedation including myocardial infarction, stroke, death, damage to nerve, artery or vein in the leg, perforation of cardiac chamber, resection of an artery, arrhythmia requiring countershock, infection, bleeding, allergy, and need for vascular surgery. All questions were answered and the patient decided to proceed.,HEMODYNAMIC DATA: , Aortic pressure was within physiologic range. There was no significant gradient across the aortic valve.,ANGIOGRAPHIC DATA,1. Ventriculogram: Left ventricle was of normal size and shape with normal wall motion, normal ejection fraction.,2. Right coronary artery: Dominant. There was a lesion in the proximal portion in the 60% range, insignificant disease distally.,3. Left coronary artery: The left main coronary artery showed insignificant disease. The circumflex arose, showed about 30% proximally. Left anterior descending arose and the previously placed stent was perfectly patent. There was a large diagonal branch which showed 90% stenosis in its proximal portion. There was a lesion in the 30% to 40% range even more proximal.,I reviewed with the patient the options of medical therapy, intervention on the culprit versus bypass surgery. He desired that we intervene.,Successful stenting of the left anterior descending, diagonal. The guide was placed in the left main. We easily crossed the lesion in the diagonal branch of the left anterior descending. We advanced, applied and post-dilated the 275 x 13 stent. Final angiography showed 0% residual at the site of previous 90% stenosis. The more proximal 30% to 40% lesion was unchanged.,CONCLUSION,1. Successful stenting of the left anterior descending/diagonal. Initially there was 90% in the diagonal after stenting. There was 0% residual. There was a lesion a bit more proximal in the 40% range.,2. Left anterior descending stent remains patent.,3. 30% in the circumflex.,4. 60% in the right coronary.,5. Ejection fraction and wall motion are normal.,PLAN: , We have stented the culprit lesion. The patient will receive a course of aspirin, Plavix, Integrilin, and statin therapy. We used 6-French Angio-Seal in the groin. All questions have been answered. I have discussed the possibility of restenosis, need for further procedures. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

NAME OF PROCEDURE:, Hypogastric plexus block.,ANESTHESIA:, Local.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was in the operating room in the prone position with the back prepped and draped in sterile fashion. Local anesthesia was used to make a skin wheal 8-10 cm lateral to the L4 spinous process bilaterally from the midline. Starting from the left side, a 20-gauge 6-inch needle was placed to the left L5-S1 facet level under AP fluoroscopic view. On lateral view, the tip of the needle was at the inferior one-third of the LS vertebral body, anterior aspect. Next 5 cc of Omnipaque dye was injection showing a linear spread along the anterior portion of L5 down the sacral promontory. After negative aspiration 18 cc of 0.25% Marcaine plus 40 mg of Depo-Medrol was injection. There were no complications. The above sequence was repeated for the right side. There were no complications. The patient was discharged back to outpatient recovery in stable condition.

name procedure hypogastric plexus blockanesthesia localprocedure patient operating room prone position back prepped draped sterile fashion local anesthesia used make skin wheal cm lateral l spinous process bilaterally midline starting left side gauge inch needle placed left ls facet level ap fluoroscopic view lateral view tip needle inferior onethird ls vertebral body anterior aspect next cc omnipaque dye injection showing linear spread along anterior portion l sacral promontory negative aspiration cc marcaine plus mg depomedrol injection complications sequence repeated right side complications patient discharged back outpatient recovery stable condition

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NAME OF PROCEDURE:, Hypogastric plexus block.,ANESTHESIA:, Local.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was in the operating room in the prone position with the back prepped and draped in sterile fashion. Local anesthesia was used to make a skin wheal 8-10 cm lateral to the L4 spinous process bilaterally from the midline. Starting from the left side, a 20-gauge 6-inch needle was placed to the left L5-S1 facet level under AP fluoroscopic view. On lateral view, the tip of the needle was at the inferior one-third of the LS vertebral body, anterior aspect. Next 5 cc of Omnipaque dye was injection showing a linear spread along the anterior portion of L5 down the sacral promontory. After negative aspiration 18 cc of 0.25% Marcaine plus 40 mg of Depo-Medrol was injection. There were no complications. The above sequence was repeated for the right side. There were no complications. The patient was discharged back to outpatient recovery in stable condition. ### Response: Pain Management

NAME OF PROCEDURE:, Successful stenting of the left anterior descending.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, Angina pectoris, tight lesion in left anterior descending.,TECHNIQUE OF PROCEDURE:, Standard Judkins, right groin.,CATHETERS USED: , 6 French Judkins, right; wire, 14 BMW; balloon for predilatation, 25 x 15 CrossSail; stent 2.5 x 18 Cypher drug-eluting stent.,ANTICOAGULATION: ,The patient was on aspirin and Plavix, received 3000 of heparin and was begun on Integrilin.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,INFORMED CONSENT: , I reviewed with the patient the pros, cons, alternatives and risks of catheter and sedation exactly as I had done before during his diagnostic catheterization, plus I reviewed the risks of intervention including lack of success, need for emergency surgery, need for later restenosis and further procedures.,HEMODYNAMIC DATA: , The aortic pressure was in the physiologic range.,ANGIOGRAPHIC DATA: , Left coronary artery: The left main coronary artery showed insignificant disease. The left anterior descending showed fairly extensive calcification. There was 90% stenosis in the proximal to midportion of the vessel. Insignificant disease in the circumflex.,SUCCESSFUL STENTING: , A wire crossed the lesion. We first predilated with a balloon, then advanced, deployed and post dilated the stent. Final angiography showed 0% stenosis, no tears or thrombi, excellent intimal appearance.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION,VITAL SIGNS: Blood pressure 160/88, temperature 98.6, pulse 83, respirations 30. He is saturating at 96% on 4 L nonrebreather.,GENERAL: The patient is a 74 year-old white male who is cooperative with the examination and alert and oriented x3. The patient cannot speak and communicates through writing.,HEENT: Very small moles on face. However, pupils equal, round and regular and reactive to light and accommodation. Extraocular movements are intact. Oropharynx is moist.,NECK: Supple. Tracheostomy site is clean without blood or discharge.,HEART: Regular rate and rhythm. No gallop, murmur or rub.,CHEST: Respirations congested. Mild crackles in the left lower quadrant and left lower base.,ABDOMEN: Soft, nontender and nondistended. Positive bowel sounds.,EXTREMITIES: No clubbing, cyanosis or edema.,NEUROLOGIC: Cranial nerves II-XII grossly intact. No focal deficit.,GENITALIA: The patient does have a right scrotal swelling, very much larger than the other side, not reproducible and mobile to touch.,CONCLUSIONS,1. Successful stenting of the left anterior descending. Initially, there was 90% stenosis. After stenting with a drug-eluting stent, there was 0% residual.,2. Insignificant disease in the other coronaries.,PLAN:, The patient will be treated with aspirin, Plavix, Integrilin, beta blockers and statins. I have discussed this with him, and I have answered his questions.

name procedure successful stenting left anterior descendingdescription procedure angina pectoris tight lesion left anterior descendingtechnique procedure standard judkins right groincatheters used french judkins right wire bmw balloon predilatation x crosssail stent x cypher drugeluting stentanticoagulation patient aspirin plavix received heparin begun integrilincomplications noneinformed consent reviewed patient pros cons alternatives risks catheter sedation exactly done diagnostic catheterization plus reviewed risks intervention including lack success need emergency surgery need later restenosis procedureshemodynamic data aortic pressure physiologic rangeangiographic data left coronary artery left main coronary artery showed insignificant disease left anterior descending showed fairly extensive calcification stenosis proximal midportion vessel insignificant disease circumflexsuccessful stenting wire crossed lesion first predilated balloon advanced deployed post dilated stent final angiography showed stenosis tears thrombi excellent intimal appearancephysical examinationvital signs blood pressure temperature pulse respirations saturating l nonrebreathergeneral patient yearold white male cooperative examination alert oriented x patient cannot speak communicates writingheent small moles face however pupils equal round regular reactive light accommodation extraocular movements intact oropharynx moistneck supple tracheostomy site clean without blood dischargeheart regular rate rhythm gallop murmur rubchest respirations congested mild crackles left lower quadrant left lower baseabdomen soft nontender nondistended positive bowel soundsextremities clubbing cyanosis edemaneurologic cranial nerves iixii grossly intact focal deficitgenitalia patient right scrotal swelling much larger side reproducible mobile touchconclusions successful stenting left anterior descending initially stenosis stenting drugeluting stent residual insignificant disease coronariesplan patient treated aspirin plavix integrilin beta blockers statins discussed answered questions

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NAME OF PROCEDURE:, Successful stenting of the left anterior descending.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE:, Angina pectoris, tight lesion in left anterior descending.,TECHNIQUE OF PROCEDURE:, Standard Judkins, right groin.,CATHETERS USED: , 6 French Judkins, right; wire, 14 BMW; balloon for predilatation, 25 x 15 CrossSail; stent 2.5 x 18 Cypher drug-eluting stent.,ANTICOAGULATION: ,The patient was on aspirin and Plavix, received 3000 of heparin and was begun on Integrilin.,COMPLICATIONS: , None.,INFORMED CONSENT: , I reviewed with the patient the pros, cons, alternatives and risks of catheter and sedation exactly as I had done before during his diagnostic catheterization, plus I reviewed the risks of intervention including lack of success, need for emergency surgery, need for later restenosis and further procedures.,HEMODYNAMIC DATA: , The aortic pressure was in the physiologic range.,ANGIOGRAPHIC DATA: , Left coronary artery: The left main coronary artery showed insignificant disease. The left anterior descending showed fairly extensive calcification. There was 90% stenosis in the proximal to midportion of the vessel. Insignificant disease in the circumflex.,SUCCESSFUL STENTING: , A wire crossed the lesion. We first predilated with a balloon, then advanced, deployed and post dilated the stent. Final angiography showed 0% stenosis, no tears or thrombi, excellent intimal appearance.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION,VITAL SIGNS: Blood pressure 160/88, temperature 98.6, pulse 83, respirations 30. He is saturating at 96% on 4 L nonrebreather.,GENERAL: The patient is a 74 year-old white male who is cooperative with the examination and alert and oriented x3. The patient cannot speak and communicates through writing.,HEENT: Very small moles on face. However, pupils equal, round and regular and reactive to light and accommodation. Extraocular movements are intact. Oropharynx is moist.,NECK: Supple. Tracheostomy site is clean without blood or discharge.,HEART: Regular rate and rhythm. No gallop, murmur or rub.,CHEST: Respirations congested. Mild crackles in the left lower quadrant and left lower base.,ABDOMEN: Soft, nontender and nondistended. Positive bowel sounds.,EXTREMITIES: No clubbing, cyanosis or edema.,NEUROLOGIC: Cranial nerves II-XII grossly intact. No focal deficit.,GENITALIA: The patient does have a right scrotal swelling, very much larger than the other side, not reproducible and mobile to touch.,CONCLUSIONS,1. Successful stenting of the left anterior descending. Initially, there was 90% stenosis. After stenting with a drug-eluting stent, there was 0% residual.,2. Insignificant disease in the other coronaries.,PLAN:, The patient will be treated with aspirin, Plavix, Integrilin, beta blockers and statins. I have discussed this with him, and I have answered his questions. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

NAME OF PROCEDURES,1. Selective coronary angiography.,2. Left heart catheterization.,3. Left ventriculography.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The right groin was sterilely prepped and draped in the usual fashion. The area of the right coronary artery was anesthetized with 2% lidocaine and a 4-French sheath was placed. Conscious sedation was obtained using a combination of Versed 1 mg and fentanyl 50 mcg. A left #4, 4-French, Judkins catheter was placed and advanced through the ostium of the left main coronary artery. Because of difficulty positioning the catheter, the catheter was removed and a 6-French sheath was placed and a 6-French #4 left Judkins catheter was placed. This was advanced through the ostium of the left main coronary artery where selective angiograms were performed. Following this, the 4-French right Judkins catheter was placed and angiograms of the right coronary were performed. A pigtail catheter was placed and a left heart catheterization was performed, followed by a left ventriculogram. The left heart pullback was performed. The catheter was removed and a small injection of contrast was given to the sheath. The sheath was removed over a wire and an Angio-Seal was placed. There were no complications. Total contrast media was 200 mL of Optiray 350. Fluoroscopy time 5.3 minutes. Total x-ray dose is 1783 mGy.,HEMODYNAMICS: ,Rhythm is sinus throughout the procedure. LV pressure of 155/22 mmHg, aortic pressure of 160/80 mmHg. LV pullback demonstrates no gradient.,The right coronary artery is a nondominant vessel and free of disease. This also gives rise to the conus branch and two RV free wall branches. The left main has minor plaquing in the inferior aspect measuring no more than 10% to 15%. This vessel then bifurcates into the LAD and circumflex. The circumflex is a large caliber vessel and is dominant. This vessel gives rise to a large first marginal artery, a moderate sized second marginal branch, and additionally gives rise to a large third marginal artery and the PDA. There was a very eccentric and severe stenosis in the proximal circumflex measuring approximately 90% in severity. The origin of the first marginal artery has a severe stenosis measuring approximately 90% in severity. The distal circumflex has a 60% lesion just prior to the origin of the third marginal branch and PDA.,The proximal LAD is ectatic. The LAD gives rise to a large first diagonal artery that has a 90% lesion in its origin and a subtotal occlusion midway down the diagonal. Distal to the origin of this diagonal branch, there is another area of ectasia in the LAD, followed by an area of stenosis that in some views is approximately 50% in severity.,The left ventriculogram demonstrates hypokinesis of the distal half of the inferior wall. The overall ejection fraction is preserved. There is moderate dilatation of the aortic root. The calculated ejection fraction is 63%.,IMPRESSION,1. Left ventricular dysfunction as evidenced by increased left ventricular end diastolic pressure and hypokinesis of the distal inferior wall.,2. Coronary artery disease with high-grade and complex lesion in the proximal portion of the dominant large circumflex coronary artery. There is subtotal stenosis at the origin of the first obtuse marginal artery.,3. A 60% stenosis in the distal circumflex.,4. Ectasia of the proximal left anterior descending with 50% stenosis in the mid left anterior descending.,5. Severe stenosis at the origin of the large diagonal artery and subtotal stenosis in the mid segment of this diagonal branch.

name procedures selective coronary angiography left heart catheterization left ventriculographyprocedure detail right groin sterilely prepped draped usual fashion area right coronary artery anesthetized lidocaine french sheath placed conscious sedation obtained using combination versed mg fentanyl mcg left french judkins catheter placed advanced ostium left main coronary artery difficulty positioning catheter catheter removed french sheath placed french left judkins catheter placed advanced ostium left main coronary artery selective angiograms performed following french right judkins catheter placed angiograms right coronary performed pigtail catheter placed left heart catheterization performed followed left ventriculogram left heart pullback performed catheter removed small injection contrast given sheath sheath removed wire angioseal placed complications total contrast media ml optiray fluoroscopy time minutes total xray dose mgyhemodynamics rhythm sinus throughout procedure lv pressure mmhg aortic pressure mmhg lv pullback demonstrates gradientthe right coronary artery nondominant vessel free disease also gives rise conus branch two rv free wall branches left main minor plaquing inferior aspect measuring vessel bifurcates lad circumflex circumflex large caliber vessel dominant vessel gives rise large first marginal artery moderate sized second marginal branch additionally gives rise large third marginal artery pda eccentric severe stenosis proximal circumflex measuring approximately severity origin first marginal artery severe stenosis measuring approximately severity distal circumflex lesion prior origin third marginal branch pdathe proximal lad ectatic lad gives rise large first diagonal artery lesion origin subtotal occlusion midway diagonal distal origin diagonal branch another area ectasia lad followed area stenosis views approximately severitythe left ventriculogram demonstrates hypokinesis distal half inferior wall overall ejection fraction preserved moderate dilatation aortic root calculated ejection fraction impression left ventricular dysfunction evidenced increased left ventricular end diastolic pressure hypokinesis distal inferior wall coronary artery disease highgrade complex lesion proximal portion dominant large circumflex coronary artery subtotal stenosis origin first obtuse marginal artery stenosis distal circumflex ectasia proximal left anterior descending stenosis mid left anterior descending severe stenosis origin large diagonal artery subtotal stenosis mid segment diagonal branch

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NAME OF PROCEDURES,1. Selective coronary angiography.,2. Left heart catheterization.,3. Left ventriculography.,PROCEDURE IN DETAIL: ,The right groin was sterilely prepped and draped in the usual fashion. The area of the right coronary artery was anesthetized with 2% lidocaine and a 4-French sheath was placed. Conscious sedation was obtained using a combination of Versed 1 mg and fentanyl 50 mcg. A left #4, 4-French, Judkins catheter was placed and advanced through the ostium of the left main coronary artery. Because of difficulty positioning the catheter, the catheter was removed and a 6-French sheath was placed and a 6-French #4 left Judkins catheter was placed. This was advanced through the ostium of the left main coronary artery where selective angiograms were performed. Following this, the 4-French right Judkins catheter was placed and angiograms of the right coronary were performed. A pigtail catheter was placed and a left heart catheterization was performed, followed by a left ventriculogram. The left heart pullback was performed. The catheter was removed and a small injection of contrast was given to the sheath. The sheath was removed over a wire and an Angio-Seal was placed. There were no complications. Total contrast media was 200 mL of Optiray 350. Fluoroscopy time 5.3 minutes. Total x-ray dose is 1783 mGy.,HEMODYNAMICS: ,Rhythm is sinus throughout the procedure. LV pressure of 155/22 mmHg, aortic pressure of 160/80 mmHg. LV pullback demonstrates no gradient.,The right coronary artery is a nondominant vessel and free of disease. This also gives rise to the conus branch and two RV free wall branches. The left main has minor plaquing in the inferior aspect measuring no more than 10% to 15%. This vessel then bifurcates into the LAD and circumflex. The circumflex is a large caliber vessel and is dominant. This vessel gives rise to a large first marginal artery, a moderate sized second marginal branch, and additionally gives rise to a large third marginal artery and the PDA. There was a very eccentric and severe stenosis in the proximal circumflex measuring approximately 90% in severity. The origin of the first marginal artery has a severe stenosis measuring approximately 90% in severity. The distal circumflex has a 60% lesion just prior to the origin of the third marginal branch and PDA.,The proximal LAD is ectatic. The LAD gives rise to a large first diagonal artery that has a 90% lesion in its origin and a subtotal occlusion midway down the diagonal. Distal to the origin of this diagonal branch, there is another area of ectasia in the LAD, followed by an area of stenosis that in some views is approximately 50% in severity.,The left ventriculogram demonstrates hypokinesis of the distal half of the inferior wall. The overall ejection fraction is preserved. There is moderate dilatation of the aortic root. The calculated ejection fraction is 63%.,IMPRESSION,1. Left ventricular dysfunction as evidenced by increased left ventricular end diastolic pressure and hypokinesis of the distal inferior wall.,2. Coronary artery disease with high-grade and complex lesion in the proximal portion of the dominant large circumflex coronary artery. There is subtotal stenosis at the origin of the first obtuse marginal artery.,3. A 60% stenosis in the distal circumflex.,4. Ectasia of the proximal left anterior descending with 50% stenosis in the mid left anterior descending.,5. Severe stenosis at the origin of the large diagonal artery and subtotal stenosis in the mid segment of this diagonal branch. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Surgery

NASAL EXAM: , The nose is grossly in the midline with no evidence of fractures or dislocations. The nasal septum is roughly in the midline with pale boggy mucosa and moderately enlarged inferior turbinates. There is no pus or polyps in the nose on anterior rhinoscopy. The airway appears adequate. No external valve prolapses are observed.,THROAT EXAM: , The oral cavity is clear. The tongue is clear with no lesions noted and with good symmetrical movement. The parotid and submaxillary ducts are producing clear mucus with no evidence of stones or infection. Palate is clear. The tonsils are not prominent.,No overt neoplasms in the mouth are noted. Lips are clear. The voice is adequate no deficits or hoarseness. The saliva is clear.,EARS: ,Canals are clear. Eardrums are clear, moving on insufflation and swallowing. No discharge is noted in the canals. Hearing appears adequate in normal tonal conversations.,NECK EXAM: , Neck is supple with no palpable masses. No lymphadenopathy. The thyroid gland is not palpable. The trachea is in the midline. The parotid and submaxillary glands are not enlarged, are symmetrical and are not tender. The neck movement is adequate.,GROSS NEUROLOGICAL EXAM: , Cranial nerves II-XII are intact. Extraocular movements are full with no restrictions. Patient is alert and responsive.,EYE EXAM: , Sclerae are clear. Conjunctivae are clear. Pupils respond symmetrically to light. Extraocular movements are complete and full.

nasal exam nose grossly midline evidence fractures dislocations nasal septum roughly midline pale boggy mucosa moderately enlarged inferior turbinates pus polyps nose anterior rhinoscopy airway appears adequate external valve prolapses observedthroat exam oral cavity clear tongue clear lesions noted good symmetrical movement parotid submaxillary ducts producing clear mucus evidence stones infection palate clear tonsils prominentno overt neoplasms mouth noted lips clear voice adequate deficits hoarseness saliva clearears canals clear eardrums clear moving insufflation swallowing discharge noted canals hearing appears adequate normal tonal conversationsneck exam neck supple palpable masses lymphadenopathy thyroid gland palpable trachea midline parotid submaxillary glands enlarged symmetrical tender neck movement adequategross neurological exam cranial nerves iixii intact extraocular movements full restrictions patient alert responsiveeye exam sclerae clear conjunctivae clear pupils respond symmetrically light extraocular movements complete full

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NASAL EXAM: , The nose is grossly in the midline with no evidence of fractures or dislocations. The nasal septum is roughly in the midline with pale boggy mucosa and moderately enlarged inferior turbinates. There is no pus or polyps in the nose on anterior rhinoscopy. The airway appears adequate. No external valve prolapses are observed.,THROAT EXAM: , The oral cavity is clear. The tongue is clear with no lesions noted and with good symmetrical movement. The parotid and submaxillary ducts are producing clear mucus with no evidence of stones or infection. Palate is clear. The tonsils are not prominent.,No overt neoplasms in the mouth are noted. Lips are clear. The voice is adequate no deficits or hoarseness. The saliva is clear.,EARS: ,Canals are clear. Eardrums are clear, moving on insufflation and swallowing. No discharge is noted in the canals. Hearing appears adequate in normal tonal conversations.,NECK EXAM: , Neck is supple with no palpable masses. No lymphadenopathy. The thyroid gland is not palpable. The trachea is in the midline. The parotid and submaxillary glands are not enlarged, are symmetrical and are not tender. The neck movement is adequate.,GROSS NEUROLOGICAL EXAM: , Cranial nerves II-XII are intact. Extraocular movements are full with no restrictions. Patient is alert and responsive.,EYE EXAM: , Sclerae are clear. Conjunctivae are clear. Pupils respond symmetrically to light. Extraocular movements are complete and full. ### Response: ENT - Otolaryngology

NERVE CONDUCTION STUDIES:, Bilateral ulnar sensory responses are absent. Bilateral median sensory distal latencies are prolonged with a severely attenuated evoked response amplitude. The left radial sensory response is normal and robust. Left sural response is absent. Left median motor distal latency is prolonged with attenuated evoked response amplitude. Conduction velocity across the forearm is mildly slowed. Right median motor distal latency is prolonged with a normal evoked response amplitude and conduction velocity. The left ulnar motor distal latency is prolonged with a severely attenuated evoked response amplitude both below and above the elbow. Conduction velocities across the forearm and across the elbow are prolonged. Conduction velocity proximal to the elbow is normal. The right median motor distal latency is normal with normal evoked response amplitudes at the wrist with a normal evoked response amplitude at the wrist. There is mild diminution of response around the elbow. Conduction velocity slows across the elbow. The left common peroneal motor distal latency evoked response amplitude is normal with slowed conduction velocity across the calf and across the fibula head. F-waves are prolonged.,NEEDLE EMG: , Needle EMG was performed on the left arm and lumbosacral and cervical paraspinal muscles as well as middle thoracic muscles using a disposable concentric needle. It revealed spontaneous activity in lower cervical paraspinals, left abductor pollicis brevis, and first dorsal interosseous muscles. There were signs of chronic reinnervation in triceps, extensor digitorum communis, flexor pollicis longus as well first dorsal interosseous and abductor pollicis brevis muscles.,IMPRESSION: , This electrical study is abnormal. It reveals the following:,1. A sensory motor length-dependent neuropathy consistent with diabetes.,2. A severe left ulnar neuropathy. This is probably at the elbow, although definitive localization cannot be made.,3. Moderate-to-severe left median neuropathy. This is also probably at the carpal tunnel, although definitive localization cannot be made.,4. Right ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, mild.,5. Right median neuropathy at the wrist consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome, moderate.,6. A left C8 radiculopathy (double crush syndrome).,7. There is no evidence for thoracic radiculitis.,The patient has made very good response with respect to his abdominal pain since starting Neurontin. He still has mild allodynia and is waiting for authorization to get insurance coverage for his Lidoderm patch. He is still scheduled for MRI of C-spine and T-spine. I will see him in followup after the above scans.

nerve conduction studies bilateral ulnar sensory responses absent bilateral median sensory distal latencies prolonged severely attenuated evoked response amplitude left radial sensory response normal robust left sural response absent left median motor distal latency prolonged attenuated evoked response amplitude conduction velocity across forearm mildly slowed right median motor distal latency prolonged normal evoked response amplitude conduction velocity left ulnar motor distal latency prolonged severely attenuated evoked response amplitude elbow conduction velocities across forearm across elbow prolonged conduction velocity proximal elbow normal right median motor distal latency normal normal evoked response amplitudes wrist normal evoked response amplitude wrist mild diminution response around elbow conduction velocity slows across elbow left common peroneal motor distal latency evoked response amplitude normal slowed conduction velocity across calf across fibula head fwaves prolongedneedle emg needle emg performed left arm lumbosacral cervical paraspinal muscles well middle thoracic muscles using disposable concentric needle revealed spontaneous activity lower cervical paraspinals left abductor pollicis brevis first dorsal interosseous muscles signs chronic reinnervation triceps extensor digitorum communis flexor pollicis longus well first dorsal interosseous abductor pollicis brevis musclesimpression electrical study abnormal reveals following sensory motor lengthdependent neuropathy consistent diabetes severe left ulnar neuropathy probably elbow although definitive localization cannot made moderatetosevere left median neuropathy also probably carpal tunnel although definitive localization cannot made right ulnar neuropathy elbow mild right median neuropathy wrist consistent carpal tunnel syndrome moderate left c radiculopathy double crush syndrome evidence thoracic radiculitisthe patient made good response respect abdominal pain since starting neurontin still mild allodynia waiting authorization get insurance coverage lidoderm patch still scheduled mri cspine tspine see followup scans

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NERVE CONDUCTION STUDIES:, Bilateral ulnar sensory responses are absent. Bilateral median sensory distal latencies are prolonged with a severely attenuated evoked response amplitude. The left radial sensory response is normal and robust. Left sural response is absent. Left median motor distal latency is prolonged with attenuated evoked response amplitude. Conduction velocity across the forearm is mildly slowed. Right median motor distal latency is prolonged with a normal evoked response amplitude and conduction velocity. The left ulnar motor distal latency is prolonged with a severely attenuated evoked response amplitude both below and above the elbow. Conduction velocities across the forearm and across the elbow are prolonged. Conduction velocity proximal to the elbow is normal. The right median motor distal latency is normal with normal evoked response amplitudes at the wrist with a normal evoked response amplitude at the wrist. There is mild diminution of response around the elbow. Conduction velocity slows across the elbow. The left common peroneal motor distal latency evoked response amplitude is normal with slowed conduction velocity across the calf and across the fibula head. F-waves are prolonged.,NEEDLE EMG: , Needle EMG was performed on the left arm and lumbosacral and cervical paraspinal muscles as well as middle thoracic muscles using a disposable concentric needle. It revealed spontaneous activity in lower cervical paraspinals, left abductor pollicis brevis, and first dorsal interosseous muscles. There were signs of chronic reinnervation in triceps, extensor digitorum communis, flexor pollicis longus as well first dorsal interosseous and abductor pollicis brevis muscles.,IMPRESSION: , This electrical study is abnormal. It reveals the following:,1. A sensory motor length-dependent neuropathy consistent with diabetes.,2. A severe left ulnar neuropathy. This is probably at the elbow, although definitive localization cannot be made.,3. Moderate-to-severe left median neuropathy. This is also probably at the carpal tunnel, although definitive localization cannot be made.,4. Right ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, mild.,5. Right median neuropathy at the wrist consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome, moderate.,6. A left C8 radiculopathy (double crush syndrome).,7. There is no evidence for thoracic radiculitis.,The patient has made very good response with respect to his abdominal pain since starting Neurontin. He still has mild allodynia and is waiting for authorization to get insurance coverage for his Lidoderm patch. He is still scheduled for MRI of C-spine and T-spine. I will see him in followup after the above scans. ### Response: Neurology, Radiology

NERVE CONDUCTION TESTING AND EMG EVALUATION,1. Right median sensory response 3.0, amplitude 2.5, distance 100.,2. Right ulnar sensory response 2.1, amplitude 1, distance 90.,3. Left median sensory response 3.0, amplitude 1.2, distance 100.,4. Left median motor response distal 4.2, proximal 9, amplitude 2.2, distance 290, velocity 60.4 m/sec.,5. Right median motor response distal 4.3, proximal 9.7, amplitude 2, and velocity 53.7 m/sec.,6. Right ulnar motor response distal 2.5, proximal 7.5, amplitude 2, distance 300, velocity 60 m/sec.,NEEDLE EMG TESTING,1. ,RIGHT BICEPS:, Fibrillations 0, fasciculations occasional, positive waves 0. Motor units, increased needle insertional activity and mild decreased number of motor units firing.,2. ,RIGHT TRICEPS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations occasional to 1+, positive waves 1+. Motor units, increased needle insertional activity and decreased number of motor units firing.,3. ,EXTENSOR DIGITORUM:, Fibrillations 0, fasciculations rare, positive waves 0, motor units probably normal.,4. ,FIRST DORSAL INTEROSSEOUS: , Fibrillations 2+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 2+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,5. ,RIGHT ABDUCTOR POLLICIS BREVIS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 0. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,6. , FLEXOR CARPI ULNARIS:, Fibrillations 1+, occasionally entrained, fasciculations rare, positive waves 1+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,7. ,LEFT FIRST DORSAL INTEROSSEOUS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves occasional. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,8. ,LEFT EXTENSOR DIGITORUM:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,9. ,RIGHT VASTUS MEDIALIS:, Fibrillations 1+ to 2+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 1+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,10. ,ANTERIOR TIBIALIS: , Fibrillations 2+, occasionally entrained, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 1+. Motor units, increased proportion of polyphasic units and decreased number of motor units firing. There is again increased needle insertional activity.,11. ,RIGHT GASTROCNEMIUS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 1+. Motor units, marked decreased number of motor units firing.,12. ,LEFT GASTROCNEMIUS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 2+. Motor units, marked decreased number of motor units firing.,13. ,LEFT VASTUS MEDIALIS: , Fibrillations occasional, fasciculations occasional, positive waves 1+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,IMPRESSION:

nerve conduction testing emg evaluation right median sensory response amplitude distance right ulnar sensory response amplitude distance left median sensory response amplitude distance left median motor response distal proximal amplitude distance velocity msec right median motor response distal proximal amplitude velocity msec right ulnar motor response distal proximal amplitude distance velocity msecneedle emg testing right biceps fibrillations fasciculations occasional positive waves motor units increased needle insertional activity mild decreased number motor units firing right triceps fibrillations fasciculations occasional positive waves motor units increased needle insertional activity decreased number motor units firing extensor digitorum fibrillations fasciculations rare positive waves motor units probably normal first dorsal interosseous fibrillations fasciculations positive waves motor units decreased number motor units firing right abductor pollicis brevis fibrillations fasciculations positive waves motor units decreased number motor units firing flexor carpi ulnaris fibrillations occasionally entrained fasciculations rare positive waves motor units decreased number motor units firing left first dorsal interosseous fibrillations fasciculations positive waves occasional motor units decreased number motor units firing left extensor digitorum fibrillations fasciculations motor units decreased number motor units firing right vastus medialis fibrillations fasciculations positive waves motor units decreased number motor units firing anterior tibialis fibrillations occasionally entrained fasciculations positive waves motor units increased proportion polyphasic units decreased number motor units firing increased needle insertional activity right gastrocnemius fibrillations fasciculations positive waves motor units marked decreased number motor units firing left gastrocnemius fibrillations fasciculations positive waves motor units marked decreased number motor units firing left vastus medialis fibrillations occasional fasciculations occasional positive waves motor units decreased number motor units firingimpression

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NERVE CONDUCTION TESTING AND EMG EVALUATION,1. Right median sensory response 3.0, amplitude 2.5, distance 100.,2. Right ulnar sensory response 2.1, amplitude 1, distance 90.,3. Left median sensory response 3.0, amplitude 1.2, distance 100.,4. Left median motor response distal 4.2, proximal 9, amplitude 2.2, distance 290, velocity 60.4 m/sec.,5. Right median motor response distal 4.3, proximal 9.7, amplitude 2, and velocity 53.7 m/sec.,6. Right ulnar motor response distal 2.5, proximal 7.5, amplitude 2, distance 300, velocity 60 m/sec.,NEEDLE EMG TESTING,1. ,RIGHT BICEPS:, Fibrillations 0, fasciculations occasional, positive waves 0. Motor units, increased needle insertional activity and mild decreased number of motor units firing.,2. ,RIGHT TRICEPS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations occasional to 1+, positive waves 1+. Motor units, increased needle insertional activity and decreased number of motor units firing.,3. ,EXTENSOR DIGITORUM:, Fibrillations 0, fasciculations rare, positive waves 0, motor units probably normal.,4. ,FIRST DORSAL INTEROSSEOUS: , Fibrillations 2+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 2+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,5. ,RIGHT ABDUCTOR POLLICIS BREVIS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 0. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,6. , FLEXOR CARPI ULNARIS:, Fibrillations 1+, occasionally entrained, fasciculations rare, positive waves 1+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,7. ,LEFT FIRST DORSAL INTEROSSEOUS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves occasional. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,8. ,LEFT EXTENSOR DIGITORUM:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,9. ,RIGHT VASTUS MEDIALIS:, Fibrillations 1+ to 2+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 1+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,10. ,ANTERIOR TIBIALIS: , Fibrillations 2+, occasionally entrained, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 1+. Motor units, increased proportion of polyphasic units and decreased number of motor units firing. There is again increased needle insertional activity.,11. ,RIGHT GASTROCNEMIUS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 1+. Motor units, marked decreased number of motor units firing.,12. ,LEFT GASTROCNEMIUS:, Fibrillations 1+, fasciculations 1+, positive waves 2+. Motor units, marked decreased number of motor units firing.,13. ,LEFT VASTUS MEDIALIS: , Fibrillations occasional, fasciculations occasional, positive waves 1+. Motor units, decreased number of motor units firing.,IMPRESSION: ### Response: Neurology, Radiology

NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION: , At present the patient is awake, alert and fully oriented. There is no evidence of cognitive or language dysfunction. Cranial nerves: Visual fields are full. Funduscopic examination is normal. Extraocular movements full. Pupils equal, round, react to light. There is no evidence of nystagmus noted. Fifth nerve function is normal. There is no facial asymmetry noted. Lower cranial nerves are normal. ,Manual motor testing reveals good tone and bulk throughout. There is no evidence of pronator drift or decreased fine finger movements. Muscle strength is 5/5 throughout. Deep tendon reflexes are 2+ throughout with downgoing toes. Sensory examination is intact to all modalities including stereognosis, graphesthesia.,TESTING OF STATION AND GAIT:, The patient is able to walk toe-heel and tandem walk. Finger-to-nose and heel-to-shin moves are normal. Romberg sign negative. I appreciate no carotid bruits or cardiac murmurs.,Noncontrast CT scan of the head shows no evidence of acute infarction, hemorrhage or extra-axial collection.

neurological examination present patient awake alert fully oriented evidence cognitive language dysfunction cranial nerves visual fields full funduscopic examination normal extraocular movements full pupils equal round react light evidence nystagmus noted fifth nerve function normal facial asymmetry noted lower cranial nerves normal manual motor testing reveals good tone bulk throughout evidence pronator drift decreased fine finger movements muscle strength throughout deep tendon reflexes throughout downgoing toes sensory examination intact modalities including stereognosis graphesthesiatesting station gait patient able walk toeheel tandem walk fingertonose heeltoshin moves normal romberg sign negative appreciate carotid bruits cardiac murmursnoncontrast ct scan head shows evidence acute infarction hemorrhage extraaxial collection

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION: , At present the patient is awake, alert and fully oriented. There is no evidence of cognitive or language dysfunction. Cranial nerves: Visual fields are full. Funduscopic examination is normal. Extraocular movements full. Pupils equal, round, react to light. There is no evidence of nystagmus noted. Fifth nerve function is normal. There is no facial asymmetry noted. Lower cranial nerves are normal. ,Manual motor testing reveals good tone and bulk throughout. There is no evidence of pronator drift or decreased fine finger movements. Muscle strength is 5/5 throughout. Deep tendon reflexes are 2+ throughout with downgoing toes. Sensory examination is intact to all modalities including stereognosis, graphesthesia.,TESTING OF STATION AND GAIT:, The patient is able to walk toe-heel and tandem walk. Finger-to-nose and heel-to-shin moves are normal. Romberg sign negative. I appreciate no carotid bruits or cardiac murmurs.,Noncontrast CT scan of the head shows no evidence of acute infarction, hemorrhage or extra-axial collection. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., Neurology, SOAP / Chart / Progress Notes

NORMAL CATARACT SURGERY,PROCEDURE DETAILS: , The patient was taken to the operating room where the Rand-Stein anesthesia protocol was followed using alfentanil and Brevital. Topical tetracaine drops were applied. The operative eye was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A lid speculum was inserted.,Under the Zeiss operating microscope, a lateral clear corneal approach was utilized. A stab incision was made with a diamond blade to the right of the lateral limbus and the anterior chamber filled with intracameral lidocaine and viscoelastic. A 3-mm single pass clear corneal incision was made just anterior to the vascular arcade of the temporal limbus using a diamond keratome. A 5- to 5.5-mm anterior capsulorrhexis was created. The nucleus was hydrodissected and hydrodelineated, and was freely movable in the capsular bag. The nucleus was then phacoemulsified using a quadrantic divide-and-conquer technique. Following the deep groove formation, the lens was split bimanually and the resultant quadrants and epicortex removed under high-vacuum burst-mode phacoemulsification. Peripheral cortex was removed with the irrigation and aspiration handpiece. The posterior capsule was polished. The capsular bag was expanded with viscoelastic. The implant was inspected under the microscope and found to be free of defects. The implant was inserted into the cartridge system under viscoelastic and placed in the capsular bag. The trailing haptic was positioned with the cartridge system. Residual viscoelastic was removed from the anterior chamber and from behind the implant. The corneal wound was hydrated with balanced salt solution. The anterior chamber was fully re-formed through the side-port incision. The wound was inspected and found to be watertight. The intraocular pressure was adjusted as necessary. The lid speculum was removed. Topical Timoptic drops, Eserine and Dexacidin ointment were applied. The eye was shielded. The patient appeared to tolerate the procedure well and left the operating room in stable condition. Followup appointment is with Dr. X on the first postoperative day.

normal cataract surgeryprocedure details patient taken operating room randstein anesthesia protocol followed using alfentanil brevital topical tetracaine drops applied operative eye prepped draped usual sterile fashion lid speculum insertedunder zeiss operating microscope lateral clear corneal approach utilized stab incision made diamond blade right lateral limbus anterior chamber filled intracameral lidocaine viscoelastic mm single pass clear corneal incision made anterior vascular arcade temporal limbus using diamond keratome mm anterior capsulorrhexis created nucleus hydrodissected hydrodelineated freely movable capsular bag nucleus phacoemulsified using quadrantic divideandconquer technique following deep groove formation lens split bimanually resultant quadrants epicortex removed highvacuum burstmode phacoemulsification peripheral cortex removed irrigation aspiration handpiece posterior capsule polished capsular bag expanded viscoelastic implant inspected microscope found free defects implant inserted cartridge system viscoelastic placed capsular bag trailing haptic positioned cartridge system residual viscoelastic removed anterior chamber behind implant corneal wound hydrated balanced salt solution anterior chamber fully reformed sideport incision wound inspected found watertight intraocular pressure adjusted necessary lid speculum removed topical timoptic drops eserine dexacidin ointment applied eye shielded patient appeared tolerate procedure well left operating room stable condition followup appointment dr x first postoperative day

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NORMAL CATARACT SURGERY,PROCEDURE DETAILS: , The patient was taken to the operating room where the Rand-Stein anesthesia protocol was followed using alfentanil and Brevital. Topical tetracaine drops were applied. The operative eye was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A lid speculum was inserted.,Under the Zeiss operating microscope, a lateral clear corneal approach was utilized. A stab incision was made with a diamond blade to the right of the lateral limbus and the anterior chamber filled with intracameral lidocaine and viscoelastic. A 3-mm single pass clear corneal incision was made just anterior to the vascular arcade of the temporal limbus using a diamond keratome. A 5- to 5.5-mm anterior capsulorrhexis was created. The nucleus was hydrodissected and hydrodelineated, and was freely movable in the capsular bag. The nucleus was then phacoemulsified using a quadrantic divide-and-conquer technique. Following the deep groove formation, the lens was split bimanually and the resultant quadrants and epicortex removed under high-vacuum burst-mode phacoemulsification. Peripheral cortex was removed with the irrigation and aspiration handpiece. The posterior capsule was polished. The capsular bag was expanded with viscoelastic. The implant was inspected under the microscope and found to be free of defects. The implant was inserted into the cartridge system under viscoelastic and placed in the capsular bag. The trailing haptic was positioned with the cartridge system. Residual viscoelastic was removed from the anterior chamber and from behind the implant. The corneal wound was hydrated with balanced salt solution. The anterior chamber was fully re-formed through the side-port incision. The wound was inspected and found to be watertight. The intraocular pressure was adjusted as necessary. The lid speculum was removed. Topical Timoptic drops, Eserine and Dexacidin ointment were applied. The eye was shielded. The patient appeared to tolerate the procedure well and left the operating room in stable condition. Followup appointment is with Dr. X on the first postoperative day. ### Response: Ophthalmology, Surgery

NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY/CARDIAC STRESS REPORT,INDICATION FOR STUDY: , Recurrent angina pectoris in a patient with documented ischemic heart disease and underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was studied in the resting state following intravenous delivery of adenosine triphosphate at 140 mcg/kg/min delivered over a total of 4 minutes. At completion of the second minute of infusion, the patient received technetium Cardiolite per protocol. During this interval, the blood pressure 150/86 dropped to near 136/80 and returned to near 166/84 at completion. No diagnostic electrocardiographic abnormalities were elaborated during this study.,REGIONAL MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION WITH ADENOSINE PROVOCATION: , Scintigraphic study reveals at this time multiple fixed defects in perfusion suggesting indeed multivessel coronary artery disease, yet no active ischemia at this time. A fixed defect is seen in the high anterolateral segment. A further fixed perfusion defect is seen in the inferoapical wall extending from close to the septum. There is no evidence for active ischemia in either distribution. Lateral wall moving towards the apex of the left ventricle is further involved from midway through the ventricle moving upward and into the high anterolateral vicinity. When viewed from the vertical projection, the high septal wall is preserved with significant loss of the mid anteroapical wall moving to the apex and in a wraparound fashion in the inferoapical wall. A limited segment of apical myocardium is still viable.,No gated wall motion study was obtained.,CONCLUSIONS: ,Cardiolite perfusion findings support multivessel coronary artery disease and likely previous multivessel infarct as has been elaborated above. There is no indication for active ischemia at this time.

nuclear cardiologycardiac stress reportindication study recurrent angina pectoris patient documented ischemic heart disease underlying ischemic cardiomyopathyprocedure patient studied resting state following intravenous delivery adenosine triphosphate mcgkgmin delivered total minutes completion second minute infusion patient received technetium cardiolite per protocol interval blood pressure dropped near returned near completion diagnostic electrocardiographic abnormalities elaborated studyregional myocardial perfusion adenosine provocation scintigraphic study reveals time multiple fixed defects perfusion suggesting indeed multivessel coronary artery disease yet active ischemia time fixed defect seen high anterolateral segment fixed perfusion defect seen inferoapical wall extending close septum evidence active ischemia either distribution lateral wall moving towards apex left ventricle involved midway ventricle moving upward high anterolateral vicinity viewed vertical projection high septal wall preserved significant loss mid anteroapical wall moving apex wraparound fashion inferoapical wall limited segment apical myocardium still viableno gated wall motion study obtainedconclusions cardiolite perfusion findings support multivessel coronary artery disease likely previous multivessel infarct elaborated indication active ischemia time

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY/CARDIAC STRESS REPORT,INDICATION FOR STUDY: , Recurrent angina pectoris in a patient with documented ischemic heart disease and underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy.,PROCEDURE: , The patient was studied in the resting state following intravenous delivery of adenosine triphosphate at 140 mcg/kg/min delivered over a total of 4 minutes. At completion of the second minute of infusion, the patient received technetium Cardiolite per protocol. During this interval, the blood pressure 150/86 dropped to near 136/80 and returned to near 166/84 at completion. No diagnostic electrocardiographic abnormalities were elaborated during this study.,REGIONAL MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION WITH ADENOSINE PROVOCATION: , Scintigraphic study reveals at this time multiple fixed defects in perfusion suggesting indeed multivessel coronary artery disease, yet no active ischemia at this time. A fixed defect is seen in the high anterolateral segment. A further fixed perfusion defect is seen in the inferoapical wall extending from close to the septum. There is no evidence for active ischemia in either distribution. Lateral wall moving towards the apex of the left ventricle is further involved from midway through the ventricle moving upward and into the high anterolateral vicinity. When viewed from the vertical projection, the high septal wall is preserved with significant loss of the mid anteroapical wall moving to the apex and in a wraparound fashion in the inferoapical wall. A limited segment of apical myocardium is still viable.,No gated wall motion study was obtained.,CONCLUSIONS: ,Cardiolite perfusion findings support multivessel coronary artery disease and likely previous multivessel infarct as has been elaborated above. There is no indication for active ischemia at this time. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Radiology

NUCLEAR MEDICINE HEPATOBILIARY SCAN,REASON FOR EXAM: , Right upper quadrant pain.,COMPARISONS: ,CT of the abdomen dated 02/13/09 and ultrasound of the abdomen dated 02/13/09.,Radiopharmaceutical 6.9 mCi of Technetium-99m Choletec.,FINDINGS:, Imaging obtained up to 30 minutes after the injection of radiopharmaceutical shows a normal hepatobiliary transfer time. There is normal accumulation within the gallbladder.,After the injection of 2.1 mcg of intravenous cholecystic _______, the gallbladder ejection fraction at 30 minutes was calculated to be 32% (normal is greater than 35%). The patient experienced 2/10 pain at 5 minutes after the injection of the radiopharmaceutical and the patient also complained of nausea.,IMPRESSION:,1. Negative for acute cholecystitis or cystic duct obstruction.,2. Gallbladder ejection fraction just under the lower limits of normal at 32% that can be seen with very mild chronic cholecystitis.

nuclear medicine hepatobiliary scanreason exam right upper quadrant paincomparisons ct abdomen dated ultrasound abdomen dated radiopharmaceutical mci technetiumm choletecfindings imaging obtained minutes injection radiopharmaceutical shows normal hepatobiliary transfer time normal accumulation within gallbladderafter injection mcg intravenous cholecystic _______ gallbladder ejection fraction minutes calculated normal greater patient experienced pain minutes injection radiopharmaceutical patient also complained nauseaimpression negative acute cholecystitis cystic duct obstruction gallbladder ejection fraction lower limits normal seen mild chronic cholecystitis

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: NUCLEAR MEDICINE HEPATOBILIARY SCAN,REASON FOR EXAM: , Right upper quadrant pain.,COMPARISONS: ,CT of the abdomen dated 02/13/09 and ultrasound of the abdomen dated 02/13/09.,Radiopharmaceutical 6.9 mCi of Technetium-99m Choletec.,FINDINGS:, Imaging obtained up to 30 minutes after the injection of radiopharmaceutical shows a normal hepatobiliary transfer time. There is normal accumulation within the gallbladder.,After the injection of 2.1 mcg of intravenous cholecystic _______, the gallbladder ejection fraction at 30 minutes was calculated to be 32% (normal is greater than 35%). The patient experienced 2/10 pain at 5 minutes after the injection of the radiopharmaceutical and the patient also complained of nausea.,IMPRESSION:,1. Negative for acute cholecystitis or cystic duct obstruction.,2. Gallbladder ejection fraction just under the lower limits of normal at 32% that can be seen with very mild chronic cholecystitis. ### Response: Gastroenterology, Radiology

OBSERVATIONS: , FEV1 is 3.76, 103% predicted. FVC is 4.98, 110% predicted. Ratio is 75. FEF 25-75 is 3.053, 82% predicted, postbronchodilator improves by 35%. DLCO is 35, 121% predicted. Residual volume is 3.04, 139% predicted. Total lung capacity is 8.34, 120% predicted.,Flow volume loop reviewed.,INTERPRETATION:, Mild restrictive airflow limitation. Clinical correlation is recommended.

observations fev predicted fvc predicted ratio fef predicted postbronchodilator improves dlco predicted residual volume predicted total lung capacity predictedflow volume loop reviewedinterpretation mild restrictive airflow limitation clinical correlation recommended

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: OBSERVATIONS: , FEV1 is 3.76, 103% predicted. FVC is 4.98, 110% predicted. Ratio is 75. FEF 25-75 is 3.053, 82% predicted, postbronchodilator improves by 35%. DLCO is 35, 121% predicted. Residual volume is 3.04, 139% predicted. Total lung capacity is 8.34, 120% predicted.,Flow volume loop reviewed.,INTERPRETATION:, Mild restrictive airflow limitation. Clinical correlation is recommended. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

OBSERVATIONS: , The forced vital capacity is 2.84 L and forced expiratory volume in 1 second is 1.93 L. The ratio between the two is 68%. Small improvement is noted in the airflows after bronchodilator therapy. Lung volumes are increased with a residual volume of 196% of predicted and total lung capacity of 142% of predicted. Single-breath diffusing capacity is slightly reduced.,IMPRESSION: , Mild-to-moderate obstructive ventilatory impairment. Some improvement in the airflows after bronchodilator therapy.

observations forced vital capacity l forced expiratory volume second l ratio two small improvement noted airflows bronchodilator therapy lung volumes increased residual volume predicted total lung capacity predicted singlebreath diffusing capacity slightly reducedimpression mildtomoderate obstructive ventilatory impairment improvement airflows bronchodilator therapy

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: OBSERVATIONS: , The forced vital capacity is 2.84 L and forced expiratory volume in 1 second is 1.93 L. The ratio between the two is 68%. Small improvement is noted in the airflows after bronchodilator therapy. Lung volumes are increased with a residual volume of 196% of predicted and total lung capacity of 142% of predicted. Single-breath diffusing capacity is slightly reduced.,IMPRESSION: , Mild-to-moderate obstructive ventilatory impairment. Some improvement in the airflows after bronchodilator therapy. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary

OCULAR FINDINGS: , Anterior chamber space: Cornea, iris, lens, and pupils all unremarkable on gross examination in each eye.,Ocular adnexal spaces appear very good in each eye.,Cyclomydril x2 was used to dilate the pupil in each eye.,Medial spaces are clear and the periphery is still hazy in each eye.,Ocular disc space, normal size and shape with a pink color with clear margin in each eye.,Macular spaces are normal in appearance for the age in each eye.,Posterior pole. No dilated blood vessels seen in each eye.,Periphery: The peripheral retina is still hazy and retinopathy of prematurity cannot be ruled out at this time in each eye.,IMPRESSION: ,Premature retina and vitreous, each eye.,PLAN: ,Recheck in two weeks.,

ocular findings anterior chamber space cornea iris lens pupils unremarkable gross examination eyeocular adnexal spaces appear good eyecyclomydril x used dilate pupil eyemedial spaces clear periphery still hazy eyeocular disc space normal size shape pink color clear margin eyemacular spaces normal appearance age eyeposterior pole dilated blood vessels seen eyeperiphery peripheral retina still hazy retinopathy prematurity cannot ruled time eyeimpression premature retina vitreous eyeplan recheck two weeks

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: OCULAR FINDINGS: , Anterior chamber space: Cornea, iris, lens, and pupils all unremarkable on gross examination in each eye.,Ocular adnexal spaces appear very good in each eye.,Cyclomydril x2 was used to dilate the pupil in each eye.,Medial spaces are clear and the periphery is still hazy in each eye.,Ocular disc space, normal size and shape with a pink color with clear margin in each eye.,Macular spaces are normal in appearance for the age in each eye.,Posterior pole. No dilated blood vessels seen in each eye.,Periphery: The peripheral retina is still hazy and retinopathy of prematurity cannot be ruled out at this time in each eye.,IMPRESSION: ,Premature retina and vitreous, each eye.,PLAN: ,Recheck in two weeks., ### Response: Ophthalmology

OPERATION PERFORMED: ,Dental prophylaxis under general anesthesia.,PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Impacted wisdom teeth.,2. Moderate gingivitis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Impacted wisdom teeth.,2. Moderate gingivitis.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: ,Minimal.,DURATION OF SURGERY: ,One hour 17 minutes.,BRIEF HISTORY: ,The patient was referred to me by Dr. X. He contacted myself and stated that Angelica was going to have her wisdom teeth extracted in the setting of a hospital operating room at Hospital and he inquired if we could pair on the procedure and I could do her full mouth dental rehabilitation before the wisdom teeth were removed by him. I agreed. I saw her in my office and she was cooperative for full mouth set of radiographs in my office and a clinical examination. This clinical and radiographic examination revealed no dental caries; however, she was in need of a good dental cleaning.,OPERATIVE PREPARATION: ,The patient was brought to Hospital Day Surgery accompanied by her mother. I met with them and discussed the needs of the child, types of restoration to be performed, and the risks and benefits of the treatment as well as the options and alternatives of the treatment. After all their questions and concerns were addressed, they gave their informed consent to proceed with the treatment. The patient's history and physical examination was reviewed. Once she was cleared by Anesthesia, she was taken back to the operating room.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: ,The patient was placed on the surgical table in the usual supine position with all extremities protected. Anesthesia was induced by mask. The patient was then intubated with a nasal endotracheal tube and the tube was stabilized. The head was wrapped and the eyes were taped shut for protection. An Angiocath was previously placed in preop. The head and neck were draped in sterile towels, and the body was covered with lead apron and sterile sheath. A moist continuous throat pack was placed beyond tonsillar pillars. Plastic lip and cheek retractors were then placed. Preoperative digital intraoral photographs were taken. No digital radiographs were taken in the operating room, as I stated before I had a full set of digital radiographs taken in my office. A prophylaxis was then performed using a Prophy cup and fluoridated Prophy paste after scaling and replaning was done. She presented with moderate calculus on the buccal surfaces of her maxillary, first molars and lower molars. She did not require any restorative dentistry.,Upon the conclusion of the restorative phase, the oral cavity was aspirated and found to be free of blood, mucus, and other debris. The original treatment plan was verified with the actual treatment provided. Postoperative clinical photographs were taken. The continuous gauze throat pack was removed with continuous suction and visualization. Topical fluoride was then placed on the teeth.,At the end of the procedure, the child was undraped, extubated, and awakened in the operating room, taken to the recovery room, breathing spontaneously with stable vital signs.,FINDINGS: , This patient presented in her permanent dentition. Her teeth #1, 16, 17, and 32 were impacted and are going to be removed following my full mouth dental rehabilitation by Dr. Alexander. Oral hygiene was fair. There was generalized plaque and calculus throughout. She did not have any caries, did not require any restorative dentistry.,CONCLUSION:, Following my dental surgery, the patient continued to intubated and was prepped for oral surgery procedures by Dr. X and his associates. There were no postop pain requirements. I did not have any specific requirements for the patient or her mother and that will be handled by Dr. X and their instructions on soft foods, etc., and pain control will be managed by them.

operation performed dental prophylaxis general anesthesiapreoperative diagnoses impacted wisdom teeth moderate gingivitispostoperative diagnoses impacted wisdom teeth moderate gingivitiscomplications noneestimated blood loss minimalduration surgery one hour minutesbrief history patient referred dr x contacted stated angelica going wisdom teeth extracted setting hospital operating room hospital inquired could pair procedure could full mouth dental rehabilitation wisdom teeth removed agreed saw office cooperative full mouth set radiographs office clinical examination clinical radiographic examination revealed dental caries however need good dental cleaningoperative preparation patient brought hospital day surgery accompanied mother met discussed needs child types restoration performed risks benefits treatment well options alternatives treatment questions concerns addressed gave informed consent proceed treatment patients history physical examination reviewed cleared anesthesia taken back operating roomoperative procedure patient placed surgical table usual supine position extremities protected anesthesia induced mask patient intubated nasal endotracheal tube tube stabilized head wrapped eyes taped shut protection angiocath previously placed preop head neck draped sterile towels body covered lead apron sterile sheath moist continuous throat pack placed beyond tonsillar pillars plastic lip cheek retractors placed preoperative digital intraoral photographs taken digital radiographs taken operating room stated full set digital radiographs taken office prophylaxis performed using prophy cup fluoridated prophy paste scaling replaning done presented moderate calculus buccal surfaces maxillary first molars lower molars require restorative dentistryupon conclusion restorative phase oral cavity aspirated found free blood mucus debris original treatment plan verified actual treatment provided postoperative clinical photographs taken continuous gauze throat pack removed continuous suction visualization topical fluoride placed teethat end procedure child undraped extubated awakened operating room taken recovery room breathing spontaneously stable vital signsfindings patient presented permanent dentition teeth impacted going removed following full mouth dental rehabilitation dr alexander oral hygiene fair generalized plaque calculus throughout caries require restorative dentistryconclusion following dental surgery patient continued intubated prepped oral surgery procedures dr x associates postop pain requirements specific requirements patient mother handled dr x instructions soft foods etc pain control managed

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: OPERATION PERFORMED: ,Dental prophylaxis under general anesthesia.,PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Impacted wisdom teeth.,2. Moderate gingivitis.,POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES:,1. Impacted wisdom teeth.,2. Moderate gingivitis.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: ,Minimal.,DURATION OF SURGERY: ,One hour 17 minutes.,BRIEF HISTORY: ,The patient was referred to me by Dr. X. He contacted myself and stated that Angelica was going to have her wisdom teeth extracted in the setting of a hospital operating room at Hospital and he inquired if we could pair on the procedure and I could do her full mouth dental rehabilitation before the wisdom teeth were removed by him. I agreed. I saw her in my office and she was cooperative for full mouth set of radiographs in my office and a clinical examination. This clinical and radiographic examination revealed no dental caries; however, she was in need of a good dental cleaning.,OPERATIVE PREPARATION: ,The patient was brought to Hospital Day Surgery accompanied by her mother. I met with them and discussed the needs of the child, types of restoration to be performed, and the risks and benefits of the treatment as well as the options and alternatives of the treatment. After all their questions and concerns were addressed, they gave their informed consent to proceed with the treatment. The patient's history and physical examination was reviewed. Once she was cleared by Anesthesia, she was taken back to the operating room.,OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: ,The patient was placed on the surgical table in the usual supine position with all extremities protected. Anesthesia was induced by mask. The patient was then intubated with a nasal endotracheal tube and the tube was stabilized. The head was wrapped and the eyes were taped shut for protection. An Angiocath was previously placed in preop. The head and neck were draped in sterile towels, and the body was covered with lead apron and sterile sheath. A moist continuous throat pack was placed beyond tonsillar pillars. Plastic lip and cheek retractors were then placed. Preoperative digital intraoral photographs were taken. No digital radiographs were taken in the operating room, as I stated before I had a full set of digital radiographs taken in my office. A prophylaxis was then performed using a Prophy cup and fluoridated Prophy paste after scaling and replaning was done. She presented with moderate calculus on the buccal surfaces of her maxillary, first molars and lower molars. She did not require any restorative dentistry.,Upon the conclusion of the restorative phase, the oral cavity was aspirated and found to be free of blood, mucus, and other debris. The original treatment plan was verified with the actual treatment provided. Postoperative clinical photographs were taken. The continuous gauze throat pack was removed with continuous suction and visualization. Topical fluoride was then placed on the teeth.,At the end of the procedure, the child was undraped, extubated, and awakened in the operating room, taken to the recovery room, breathing spontaneously with stable vital signs.,FINDINGS: , This patient presented in her permanent dentition. Her teeth #1, 16, 17, and 32 were impacted and are going to be removed following my full mouth dental rehabilitation by Dr. Alexander. Oral hygiene was fair. There was generalized plaque and calculus throughout. She did not have any caries, did not require any restorative dentistry.,CONCLUSION:, Following my dental surgery, the patient continued to intubated and was prepped for oral surgery procedures by Dr. X and his associates. There were no postop pain requirements. I did not have any specific requirements for the patient or her mother and that will be handled by Dr. X and their instructions on soft foods, etc., and pain control will be managed by them. ### Response: Surgery

OPERATION PERFORMED: , Cervical epidural steroid injection C7-T1.,ANESTHESIA:, Local and Versed 2 mg IV.,COMPLICATIONS: ,None.,DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: ,The patient was placed in the seated position with the neck flexed the forehead was placed on a cervical rest. The head and cervical spine were restrained. The patient was monitored with a blood pressure cuff, EKG and pulse oximetry. The skin was prepped and draped in sterile classical fashion. Excess cleansing solution was removed from the skin. Local anesthesia was injected at C7-T1. An 18-gauge Tuohy needle was then placed in the epidural space with loss of resistance technique and a saline-filled syringe utilizing a midline intralaminar approach.,Once the epidural space was identified, a negative aspiration for heme or CSF was done. This was followed by the injection of 6 cc of saline mixed with methyl prednisolone acetate 120 mg in aliquots of 2 cc. Negative aspirations were done prior to each injection. The needle was cleared with saline prior to its withdrawal. The patient tolerated the procedure well without any apparent difficulties or complications.