Datasets:

JamBelg

/

Argilla_prompt_llm

like 0

Thereafter, he was evaluated and it was felt that further reconstruction as related to the anterior cruciate ligament was definitely not indicated. On December 5, 2008, Mr. XXXX did undergo a total knee replacement arthroplasty performed by Dr. X.,Thereafter, he did an extensive course of physical therapy, work hardening, and a work conditioning type program.,At the present time, he does complain of significant pain and swelling as related to the right knee. He is unable to crawl and/or kneel. He does state he is able to walk a city block and in fact, he is able to do 20 minutes of a treadmill. Stairs are a significant problem. His pain is a 5 to 6 on a scale of 1 to 10.,He is better when he is resting, sitting, propped up, and utilizing his ice. He is much worse when he is doing any type of physical activity.,He has denied having any previous history of similar problems.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: ,Over-the-counter pain medication.,ALLERGIES: , NKA.,SURGERIES: , Numerous surgeries as related to the right lower extremity.,SOCIAL HISTORY: , He does admit to one half pack of cigarette consumption per day. He denies any alcohol consumption.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: ,On examination today, he is 28-year-old male who is 6 feet 1, weighs 250 pounds. He does not appear to be in distress at this time. One could appreciate 1-2/4 intraarticular effusion. The range of motion is 0 to a 110 degrees of flexion. I could not appreciate any evidence of instability medial, lateral, anterior or posterior. Crepitus is noted with regards to range of motion testing. His strength is 4 to 5 as related to the quadriceps and hamstring.,There is atrophy as related to the right thigh. The patient is able to stand from a seated position and sit from a standing position without difficulty.,RECORDS REVIEW:,1. First report of injury.,2. July 17, 2002, x-rays of the right knee were negative.,3. Notes of the Medina General Hospital Occupational Health, Steven Rodgers, M.D.,4. August 5, 2002, an MRI scan of the right knee which demonstrated peripheral tear of the posterior horn of the medial

thereafter evaluated felt reconstruction related anterior cruciate ligament definitely indicated december mr xxxx undergo total knee replacement arthroplasty performed dr xthereafter extensive course physical therapy work hardening work conditioning type programat present time complain significant pain swelling related right knee unable crawl andor kneel state able walk city block fact able minutes treadmill stairs significant problem pain scale better resting sitting propped utilizing ice much worse type physical activityhe denied previous history similar problemscurrent medications overthecounter pain medicationallergies nkasurgeries numerous surgeries related right lower extremitysocial history admit one half pack cigarette consumption per day denies alcohol consumptionphysical examination examination today yearold male feet weighs pounds appear distress time one could appreciate intraarticular effusion range motion degrees flexion could appreciate evidence instability medial lateral anterior posterior crepitus noted regards range motion testing strength related quadriceps hamstringthere atrophy related right thigh patient able stand seated position sit standing position without difficultyrecords review first report injury july xrays right knee negative notes medina general hospital occupational health steven rodgers md august mri scan right knee demonstrated peripheral tear posterior horn medial

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: Thereafter, he was evaluated and it was felt that further reconstruction as related to the anterior cruciate ligament was definitely not indicated. On December 5, 2008, Mr. XXXX did undergo a total knee replacement arthroplasty performed by Dr. X.,Thereafter, he did an extensive course of physical therapy, work hardening, and a work conditioning type program.,At the present time, he does complain of significant pain and swelling as related to the right knee. He is unable to crawl and/or kneel. He does state he is able to walk a city block and in fact, he is able to do 20 minutes of a treadmill. Stairs are a significant problem. His pain is a 5 to 6 on a scale of 1 to 10.,He is better when he is resting, sitting, propped up, and utilizing his ice. He is much worse when he is doing any type of physical activity.,He has denied having any previous history of similar problems.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: ,Over-the-counter pain medication.,ALLERGIES: , NKA.,SURGERIES: , Numerous surgeries as related to the right lower extremity.,SOCIAL HISTORY: , He does admit to one half pack of cigarette consumption per day. He denies any alcohol consumption.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: ,On examination today, he is 28-year-old male who is 6 feet 1, weighs 250 pounds. He does not appear to be in distress at this time. One could appreciate 1-2/4 intraarticular effusion. The range of motion is 0 to a 110 degrees of flexion. I could not appreciate any evidence of instability medial, lateral, anterior or posterior. Crepitus is noted with regards to range of motion testing. His strength is 4 to 5 as related to the quadriceps and hamstring.,There is atrophy as related to the right thigh. The patient is able to stand from a seated position and sit from a standing position without difficulty.,RECORDS REVIEW:,1. First report of injury.,2. July 17, 2002, x-rays of the right knee were negative.,3. Notes of the Medina General Hospital Occupational Health, Steven Rodgers, M.D.,4. August 5, 2002, an MRI scan of the right knee which demonstrated peripheral tear of the posterior horn of the medial ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., Orthopedic

VITAL SIGNS: , Blood pressure *, pulse *, respirations *, temperature *.,GENERAL APPEARANCE:, Alert and in no apparent distress, calm, cooperative, and communicative.,HEENT: , Eyes: EOMI. PERRLA. Sclerae nonicteric. No lesions of lids, lashes, brows, or conjunctivae noted. Funduscopic examination unremarkable. Ears: Normal set, shape, TMs, canals and hearing. Nose and Sinuses: Negative. Mouth, Tongue, Teeth, and Throat: Negative except for dental work.,NECK: , Supple and pain free without bruit, JVD, adenopathy or thyroid abnormality.,CHEST:, Lungs are bilaterally clear to auscultation and percussion.,HEART: , S1 and S2. Regular rate and rhythm without murmur, heave, click, lift, thrill, rub, or gallop. PMI nondisplaced. Chest wall unremarkable to inspection and palpation. No axillary or supraclavicular adenopathy detected.,BREASTS:, In the seated and supine position unremarkable.,ABDOMEN: , No hepatosplenomegaly, mass, tenderness, rebound, rigidity, or guarding. No widening of the aortic impulse and no intraabdominal bruit auscultated.,EXTERNAL GENITALIA: , Normal for age.,RECTAL: , Negative to 7 cm by gloved digital palpation with Hemoccult-negative stool.,EXTREMITIES: , Good distal pulse and perfusion without evidence of edema, cyanosis, clubbing, or deep venous thrombosis. Nails of the hands and feet, and creases of the palms and soles are unremarkable. Good active and passive range of motion of all major joints.,BACK:, Normal to inspection and percussion. Negative for spinous process tenderness or CVA tenderness. Negative straight-leg raising, Kernig, and Brudzinski signs.,NEUROLOGIC:, Nonfocal for cranial and peripheral nervous systems, strength, sensation, and cerebellar function. Affect is normal. Speech is clear and fluent. Thought process is lucid and rational. Gait and station are unremarkable.,SKIN: , Unremarkable for any premalignant or malignant condition with normal changes for age.

vital signs blood pressure pulse respirations temperature general appearance alert apparent distress calm cooperative communicativeheent eyes eomi perrla sclerae nonicteric lesions lids lashes brows conjunctivae noted funduscopic examination unremarkable ears normal set shape tms canals hearing nose sinuses negative mouth tongue teeth throat negative except dental workneck supple pain free without bruit jvd adenopathy thyroid abnormalitychest lungs bilaterally clear auscultation percussionheart regular rate rhythm without murmur heave click lift thrill rub gallop pmi nondisplaced chest wall unremarkable inspection palpation axillary supraclavicular adenopathy detectedbreasts seated supine position unremarkableabdomen hepatosplenomegaly mass tenderness rebound rigidity guarding widening aortic impulse intraabdominal bruit auscultatedexternal genitalia normal agerectal negative cm gloved digital palpation hemoccultnegative stoolextremities good distal pulse perfusion without evidence edema cyanosis clubbing deep venous thrombosis nails hands feet creases palms soles unremarkable good active passive range motion major jointsback normal inspection percussion negative spinous process tenderness cva tenderness negative straightleg raising kernig brudzinski signsneurologic nonfocal cranial peripheral nervous systems strength sensation cerebellar function affect normal speech clear fluent thought process lucid rational gait station unremarkableskin unremarkable premalignant malignant condition normal changes age

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: VITAL SIGNS: , Blood pressure *, pulse *, respirations *, temperature *.,GENERAL APPEARANCE:, Alert and in no apparent distress, calm, cooperative, and communicative.,HEENT: , Eyes: EOMI. PERRLA. Sclerae nonicteric. No lesions of lids, lashes, brows, or conjunctivae noted. Funduscopic examination unremarkable. Ears: Normal set, shape, TMs, canals and hearing. Nose and Sinuses: Negative. Mouth, Tongue, Teeth, and Throat: Negative except for dental work.,NECK: , Supple and pain free without bruit, JVD, adenopathy or thyroid abnormality.,CHEST:, Lungs are bilaterally clear to auscultation and percussion.,HEART: , S1 and S2. Regular rate and rhythm without murmur, heave, click, lift, thrill, rub, or gallop. PMI nondisplaced. Chest wall unremarkable to inspection and palpation. No axillary or supraclavicular adenopathy detected.,BREASTS:, In the seated and supine position unremarkable.,ABDOMEN: , No hepatosplenomegaly, mass, tenderness, rebound, rigidity, or guarding. No widening of the aortic impulse and no intraabdominal bruit auscultated.,EXTERNAL GENITALIA: , Normal for age.,RECTAL: , Negative to 7 cm by gloved digital palpation with Hemoccult-negative stool.,EXTREMITIES: , Good distal pulse and perfusion without evidence of edema, cyanosis, clubbing, or deep venous thrombosis. Nails of the hands and feet, and creases of the palms and soles are unremarkable. Good active and passive range of motion of all major joints.,BACK:, Normal to inspection and percussion. Negative for spinous process tenderness or CVA tenderness. Negative straight-leg raising, Kernig, and Brudzinski signs.,NEUROLOGIC:, Nonfocal for cranial and peripheral nervous systems, strength, sensation, and cerebellar function. Affect is normal. Speech is clear and fluent. Thought process is lucid and rational. Gait and station are unremarkable.,SKIN: , Unremarkable for any premalignant or malignant condition with normal changes for age. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

VITAL SIGNS:, Blood pressure *, pulse *, respirations *, temperature *.,GENERAL APPEARANCE: , Alert and in no apparent distress, calm, cooperative, and communicative.,HEENT:, Eyes: EOMI. PERRLA. Sclerae nonicteric. No lesions lids, lashes, brows, or conjunctivae noted. Funduscopic examination unremarkable. No papilledema, glaucoma, or cataracts. Ears: Normal set and shape with normal hearing and normal TMs. Nose and Sinus: Unremarkable. Mouth, Tongue, Teeth, and Throat: Negative except for dental work.,NECK: , Supple and pain free without carotid bruit, JVD, or significant cervical adenopathy. Trachea is midline without stridor, shift, or subcutaneous emphysema. Thyroid is palpable, nontender, not enlarged, and free of nodularity.,CHEST: , Lungs bilaterally clear to auscultation and percussion.,HEART: , S1 and S2. Regular rate and rhythm without murmur, heave, click, lift, thrill, rub, or gallop. PMI is nondisplaced. Chest wall is unremarkable to inspection and palpation. No axillary or supraclavicular adenopathy detected.,BREASTS: , Normal male breast tissue.,ABDOMEN:, No hepatosplenomegaly, mass, tenderness, rebound, rigidity, or guarding. No widening of the aortic impulse and intraabdominal bruit on auscultation.,EXTERNAL GENITALIA: , Normal for age. Normal penis with bilaterally descended testes that are normal in size, shape, and contour, and without evidence of hernia or hydrocele.,RECTAL:, Negative to 7 cm by gloved digital palpation with Hemoccult-negative stool and normal-sized prostate that is free of nodularity or tenderness. No rectal masses palpated.,EXTREMITIES: , Good distal pulse and perfusion without evidence of edema, cyanosis, clubbing, or deep venous thrombosis. Nails of the hands and feet, and creases of the palms and soles are unremarkable. Good active and passive range of motion of all major joints.,BACK: , Normal to inspection and percussion. Negative for spinous process tenderness or CVA tenderness. Negative straight-leg raising, Kernig, and Brudzinski signs.,NEUROLOGIC: , Nonfocal for cranial and peripheral nervous systems, strength, sensation, and cerebellar function. Affect is normal. Speech is clear and fluent. Thought process is lucid and rational. Gait and station are unremarkable.,SKIN: ,Unremarkable for any premalignant or malignant condition with normal changes for age.

vital signs blood pressure pulse respirations temperature general appearance alert apparent distress calm cooperative communicativeheent eyes eomi perrla sclerae nonicteric lesions lids lashes brows conjunctivae noted funduscopic examination unremarkable papilledema glaucoma cataracts ears normal set shape normal hearing normal tms nose sinus unremarkable mouth tongue teeth throat negative except dental workneck supple pain free without carotid bruit jvd significant cervical adenopathy trachea midline without stridor shift subcutaneous emphysema thyroid palpable nontender enlarged free nodularitychest lungs bilaterally clear auscultation percussionheart regular rate rhythm without murmur heave click lift thrill rub gallop pmi nondisplaced chest wall unremarkable inspection palpation axillary supraclavicular adenopathy detectedbreasts normal male breast tissueabdomen hepatosplenomegaly mass tenderness rebound rigidity guarding widening aortic impulse intraabdominal bruit auscultationexternal genitalia normal age normal penis bilaterally descended testes normal size shape contour without evidence hernia hydrocelerectal negative cm gloved digital palpation hemoccultnegative stool normalsized prostate free nodularity tenderness rectal masses palpatedextremities good distal pulse perfusion without evidence edema cyanosis clubbing deep venous thrombosis nails hands feet creases palms soles unremarkable good active passive range motion major jointsback normal inspection percussion negative spinous process tenderness cva tenderness negative straightleg raising kernig brudzinski signsneurologic nonfocal cranial peripheral nervous systems strength sensation cerebellar function affect normal speech clear fluent thought process lucid rational gait station unremarkableskin unremarkable premalignant malignant condition normal changes age

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: VITAL SIGNS:, Blood pressure *, pulse *, respirations *, temperature *.,GENERAL APPEARANCE: , Alert and in no apparent distress, calm, cooperative, and communicative.,HEENT:, Eyes: EOMI. PERRLA. Sclerae nonicteric. No lesions lids, lashes, brows, or conjunctivae noted. Funduscopic examination unremarkable. No papilledema, glaucoma, or cataracts. Ears: Normal set and shape with normal hearing and normal TMs. Nose and Sinus: Unremarkable. Mouth, Tongue, Teeth, and Throat: Negative except for dental work.,NECK: , Supple and pain free without carotid bruit, JVD, or significant cervical adenopathy. Trachea is midline without stridor, shift, or subcutaneous emphysema. Thyroid is palpable, nontender, not enlarged, and free of nodularity.,CHEST: , Lungs bilaterally clear to auscultation and percussion.,HEART: , S1 and S2. Regular rate and rhythm without murmur, heave, click, lift, thrill, rub, or gallop. PMI is nondisplaced. Chest wall is unremarkable to inspection and palpation. No axillary or supraclavicular adenopathy detected.,BREASTS: , Normal male breast tissue.,ABDOMEN:, No hepatosplenomegaly, mass, tenderness, rebound, rigidity, or guarding. No widening of the aortic impulse and intraabdominal bruit on auscultation.,EXTERNAL GENITALIA: , Normal for age. Normal penis with bilaterally descended testes that are normal in size, shape, and contour, and without evidence of hernia or hydrocele.,RECTAL:, Negative to 7 cm by gloved digital palpation with Hemoccult-negative stool and normal-sized prostate that is free of nodularity or tenderness. No rectal masses palpated.,EXTREMITIES: , Good distal pulse and perfusion without evidence of edema, cyanosis, clubbing, or deep venous thrombosis. Nails of the hands and feet, and creases of the palms and soles are unremarkable. Good active and passive range of motion of all major joints.,BACK: , Normal to inspection and percussion. Negative for spinous process tenderness or CVA tenderness. Negative straight-leg raising, Kernig, and Brudzinski signs.,NEUROLOGIC: , Nonfocal for cranial and peripheral nervous systems, strength, sensation, and cerebellar function. Affect is normal. Speech is clear and fluent. Thought process is lucid and rational. Gait and station are unremarkable.,SKIN: ,Unremarkable for any premalignant or malignant condition with normal changes for age. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

VITAL SIGNS:, Reveal a blood pressure of *, temperature of *, respirations *, and pulse of *.,CONSTITUTIONAL: , Normal appearance for chronological age, does not appear chronically ill.,HEENT: , The pupils are equal and reactive. Funduscopic examination is normal. Posterior pharynx is normal. Tympanic membranes are clear.,NECK: ,Trachea is midline. Thyroid is normal. The neck is supple. Negative nodes.,RESPIRATORY:, Lungs are clear to auscultation bilaterally. The patient has a normal respiratory rate, no signs of consolidation and no egophony. There are no retractions or secondary muscle use. Good bilateral breath sounds are noted.,CARDIOVASCULAR: , No jugular venous distention or carotid bruits. No increase in heart size to percussion. There is no murmur. Normal S1 and S2 sounds are noted without gallop.,ABDOMEN: , Soft to palpation in all four quadrants. There is no organomegaly and no rebound tenderness. Bowel sounds are normal. Obturator and psoas signs are negative.,GENITOURINARY: , No bladder tenderness, negative flank pain.,MUSCULOSKELETAL:, Extremities are normal with good motor tone and strength, normal reflexes, and normal joint strength and sensation.,NEUROLOGIC: , Normal Glasgow Coma Scale. Cranial nerves II through XII appear grossly intact. Normal motor and cerebellar tests. Reflexes are normal.,HEME/LYMPH: ,No abnormal lymph nodes, no signs of bleeding, skin purpura, petechiae or hemorrhage.,PSYCHIATRIC: , Normal with no overt depression or suicidal ideations.

vital signs reveal blood pressure temperature respirations pulse constitutional normal appearance chronological age appear chronically illheent pupils equal reactive funduscopic examination normal posterior pharynx normal tympanic membranes clearneck trachea midline thyroid normal neck supple negative nodesrespiratory lungs clear auscultation bilaterally patient normal respiratory rate signs consolidation egophony retractions secondary muscle use good bilateral breath sounds notedcardiovascular jugular venous distention carotid bruits increase heart size percussion murmur normal sounds noted without gallopabdomen soft palpation four quadrants organomegaly rebound tenderness bowel sounds normal obturator psoas signs negativegenitourinary bladder tenderness negative flank painmusculoskeletal extremities normal good motor tone strength normal reflexes normal joint strength sensationneurologic normal glasgow coma scale cranial nerves ii xii appear grossly intact normal motor cerebellar tests reflexes normalhemelymph abnormal lymph nodes signs bleeding skin purpura petechiae hemorrhagepsychiatric normal overt depression suicidal ideations

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: VITAL SIGNS:, Reveal a blood pressure of *, temperature of *, respirations *, and pulse of *.,CONSTITUTIONAL: , Normal appearance for chronological age, does not appear chronically ill.,HEENT: , The pupils are equal and reactive. Funduscopic examination is normal. Posterior pharynx is normal. Tympanic membranes are clear.,NECK: ,Trachea is midline. Thyroid is normal. The neck is supple. Negative nodes.,RESPIRATORY:, Lungs are clear to auscultation bilaterally. The patient has a normal respiratory rate, no signs of consolidation and no egophony. There are no retractions or secondary muscle use. Good bilateral breath sounds are noted.,CARDIOVASCULAR: , No jugular venous distention or carotid bruits. No increase in heart size to percussion. There is no murmur. Normal S1 and S2 sounds are noted without gallop.,ABDOMEN: , Soft to palpation in all four quadrants. There is no organomegaly and no rebound tenderness. Bowel sounds are normal. Obturator and psoas signs are negative.,GENITOURINARY: , No bladder tenderness, negative flank pain.,MUSCULOSKELETAL:, Extremities are normal with good motor tone and strength, normal reflexes, and normal joint strength and sensation.,NEUROLOGIC: , Normal Glasgow Coma Scale. Cranial nerves II through XII appear grossly intact. Normal motor and cerebellar tests. Reflexes are normal.,HEME/LYMPH: ,No abnormal lymph nodes, no signs of bleeding, skin purpura, petechiae or hemorrhage.,PSYCHIATRIC: , Normal with no overt depression or suicidal ideations. ### Response: Consult - History and Phy., General Medicine

VITRECTOMY OPENING,The patient was brought to the operating room and appropriately identified. General anesthesia was induced by the anesthesiologist. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A lid speculum was used to provide exposure to the right eye. A limited conjunctival peritomy was created with Westcott scissors to expose the supranasal and separately the supratemporal and inferotemporal quadrants. Hemostasis was maintained with wet-field cautery. Calipers were set at XX mm and the mark was made XX mm posterior to the limbus in the inferotemporal quadrant. A 5-0 nylon suture was passed through partial-thickness sclera on either side of this mark. The MVR blade was used to make a sclerotomy between the preplaced sutures. An 8-0 nylon suture was then preplaced for a later sclerotomy closure. The infusion cannula was inspected and found to be in good working order. The infusion cannula was placed into the vitreous cavity and secured with the preplaced suture. The tip of the infusion cannula was directly visualized and found to be free of any overlying tissue and the infusion was turned on. Additional sclerotomies were made XX mm posterior to the limbus in the supranasal and supratemporal quadrants.

vitrectomy openingthe patient brought operating room appropriately identified general anesthesia induced anesthesiologist patient prepped draped usual sterile fashion lid speculum used provide exposure right eye limited conjunctival peritomy created westcott scissors expose supranasal separately supratemporal inferotemporal quadrants hemostasis maintained wetfield cautery calipers set xx mm mark made xx mm posterior limbus inferotemporal quadrant nylon suture passed partialthickness sclera either side mark mvr blade used make sclerotomy preplaced sutures nylon suture preplaced later sclerotomy closure infusion cannula inspected found good working order infusion cannula placed vitreous cavity secured preplaced suture tip infusion cannula directly visualized found free overlying tissue infusion turned additional sclerotomies made xx mm posterior limbus supranasal supratemporal quadrants

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: VITRECTOMY OPENING,The patient was brought to the operating room and appropriately identified. General anesthesia was induced by the anesthesiologist. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A lid speculum was used to provide exposure to the right eye. A limited conjunctival peritomy was created with Westcott scissors to expose the supranasal and separately the supratemporal and inferotemporal quadrants. Hemostasis was maintained with wet-field cautery. Calipers were set at XX mm and the mark was made XX mm posterior to the limbus in the inferotemporal quadrant. A 5-0 nylon suture was passed through partial-thickness sclera on either side of this mark. The MVR blade was used to make a sclerotomy between the preplaced sutures. An 8-0 nylon suture was then preplaced for a later sclerotomy closure. The infusion cannula was inspected and found to be in good working order. The infusion cannula was placed into the vitreous cavity and secured with the preplaced suture. The tip of the infusion cannula was directly visualized and found to be free of any overlying tissue and the infusion was turned on. Additional sclerotomies were made XX mm posterior to the limbus in the supranasal and supratemporal quadrants. ### Response: Ophthalmology, Surgery

We discovered new T-wave abnormalities on her EKG. There was of course a four-vessel bypass surgery in 2001. We did a coronary angiogram. This demonstrated patent vein grafts and patent internal mammary vessel and so there was no obvious new disease.,She may continue in the future to have angina and she will have nitroglycerin available for that if needed.,Her blood pressure has been elevated and so instead of metoprolol, we have started her on Coreg 6.25 mg b.i.d. This should be increased up to 25 mg b.i.d. as preferred antihypertensive in this lady's case. She also is on an ACE inhibitor.,So her discharge meds are as follows:,1. Coreg 6.25 mg b.i.d.,2. Simvastatin 40 mg nightly.,3. Lisinopril 5 mg b.i.d.,4. Protonix 40 mg a.m.,5. Aspirin 160 mg a day.,6. Lasix 20 mg b.i.d.,7. Spiriva puff daily.,8. Albuterol p.r.n. q.i.d.,9. Advair 500/50 puff b.i.d.,10. Xopenex q.i.d. and p.r.n.,I will see her in a month to six weeks. She is to follow up with Dr. X before that.

discovered new twave abnormalities ekg course fourvessel bypass surgery coronary angiogram demonstrated patent vein grafts patent internal mammary vessel obvious new diseaseshe may continue future angina nitroglycerin available neededher blood pressure elevated instead metoprolol started coreg mg bid increased mg bid preferred antihypertensive ladys case also ace inhibitorso discharge meds follows coreg mg bid simvastatin mg nightly lisinopril mg bid protonix mg aspirin mg day lasix mg bid spiriva puff daily albuterol prn qid advair puff bid xopenex qid prni see month six weeks follow dr x

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: We discovered new T-wave abnormalities on her EKG. There was of course a four-vessel bypass surgery in 2001. We did a coronary angiogram. This demonstrated patent vein grafts and patent internal mammary vessel and so there was no obvious new disease.,She may continue in the future to have angina and she will have nitroglycerin available for that if needed.,Her blood pressure has been elevated and so instead of metoprolol, we have started her on Coreg 6.25 mg b.i.d. This should be increased up to 25 mg b.i.d. as preferred antihypertensive in this lady's case. She also is on an ACE inhibitor.,So her discharge meds are as follows:,1. Coreg 6.25 mg b.i.d.,2. Simvastatin 40 mg nightly.,3. Lisinopril 5 mg b.i.d.,4. Protonix 40 mg a.m.,5. Aspirin 160 mg a day.,6. Lasix 20 mg b.i.d.,7. Spiriva puff daily.,8. Albuterol p.r.n. q.i.d.,9. Advair 500/50 puff b.i.d.,10. Xopenex q.i.d. and p.r.n.,I will see her in a month to six weeks. She is to follow up with Dr. X before that. ### Response: Cardiovascular / Pulmonary, Discharge Summary, General Medicine, SOAP / Chart / Progress Notes

XYZ Street,City, State,Dear Dr. CD:,Thank you for seeing Mr. XYZ, a pleasant 19-year-old male who has seen you in 2005 for suspected seizure activity. He comes to my office today continuing on Dilantin 300 mg daily and has been seizure episode free for the past 2 1/2 years. He is requesting to come off the Dilantin at this point. Upon reviewing your 2005 note there was some discrepancy as to the true nature of his episodes to the emergency room and there was consideration to reconsider medication use. His physical exam, neurologically, is normal at this time. His Dilantin level is slightly low at 12.5.,I will appreciate your evaluation and recommendation as to whether we need to continue the Dilantin at this time. I understand this will probably entail repeating his EEG and so please coordinate this through Health Center. I await your response and whether we should continue this medication. If you require any laboratory, we use ABC Diagnostic and any further testing that is needed should be coordinated at Health Center prior to scheduling.

xyz streetcity statedear dr cdthank seeing mr xyz pleasant yearold male seen suspected seizure activity comes office today continuing dilantin mg daily seizure episode free past years requesting come dilantin point upon reviewing note discrepancy true nature episodes emergency room consideration reconsider medication use physical exam neurologically normal time dilantin level slightly low appreciate evaluation recommendation whether need continue dilantin time understand probably entail repeating eeg please coordinate health center await response whether continue medication require laboratory use abc diagnostic testing needed coordinated health center prior scheduling

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ Street,City, State,Dear Dr. CD:,Thank you for seeing Mr. XYZ, a pleasant 19-year-old male who has seen you in 2005 for suspected seizure activity. He comes to my office today continuing on Dilantin 300 mg daily and has been seizure episode free for the past 2 1/2 years. He is requesting to come off the Dilantin at this point. Upon reviewing your 2005 note there was some discrepancy as to the true nature of his episodes to the emergency room and there was consideration to reconsider medication use. His physical exam, neurologically, is normal at this time. His Dilantin level is slightly low at 12.5.,I will appreciate your evaluation and recommendation as to whether we need to continue the Dilantin at this time. I understand this will probably entail repeating his EEG and so please coordinate this through Health Center. I await your response and whether we should continue this medication. If you require any laboratory, we use ABC Diagnostic and any further testing that is needed should be coordinated at Health Center prior to scheduling. ### Response: Neurology

XYZ, D.C.,60 Evergreen Place,Suite 902,East Orange, NJ 07018,Re:

xyz dc evergreen placesuite east orange nj

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ, D.C.,60 Evergreen Place,Suite 902,East Orange, NJ 07018,Re: ### Response: Orthopedic

XYZ, D.C.,Re: ABC,Dear Dr. XYZ:,I had the pleasure of seeing your patient, ABC, today MM/DD/YYYY in consultation. He is an unfortunate 19-year-old right-handed male who was injured in a motor vehicle accident on MM/DD/YYYY, where he was the driver of an automobile, which was struck on the front passenger's side. The patient sustained impact injuries to his neck and lower back. There was no apparent head injury or loss of consciousness and he denied any posttraumatic seizures. He was taken to Hospital, x-rays were taken, apparently which were negative and he was released.,At the present time, he complains of neck and lower back pain radiating into his right arm and right leg with weakness, numbness, paraesthesia, and tingling in his right arm and right leg. He has had no difficulty with bowel or bladder function. He does experience intermittent headaches associated with his neck pain with no other associated symptoms.,PAST HEALTH:, He was injured in a prior motor vehicle accident on MM/DD/YYYY. At the time of his most recent injuries, he was completely symptom free and under no active therapy. There is no history of hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, neurological disorders, ulcers or tuberculosis.,SOCIAL HISTORY: , He denies tobacco or alcohol consumption.,ALLERGIES: , No known drug allergies.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: ,None.,FAMILY HISTORY: , Otherwise noncontributory.,FUNCTIONAL INQUIRY: , Otherwise noncontributory.,REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES:, Includes an MRI scan of the cervical spine dated MM/DD/YYYY which showed evidence for disc bulging at the C6-C7 level. MRI scan of the lumbar spine on MM/DD/YYYY, showed evidence of a disc herniation at the L1-L2 level as well as a disc protrusion at the L2-L3 level with disc herniations at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 level and disc protrusion at the L5-S1 level.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , Reveals an alert and oriented male with normal language function. Vital Signs: Blood pressure was 105/68 in the left arm sitting. Heart rate was 70 and regular. Height was 5 feet 8 inches. Weight was 182 pounds. Cranial nerve evaluation was unremarkable. Pupils were equal and reactive. Funduscopic evaluation was clear. There was no evidence for nystagmus. There was decreased range of motion noted in both the cervical and lumbar regions to a significant degree, with tenderness and spasm in the paraspinal musculature. Straight leg raising was limited to 45 degrees on the right and 90 degrees on the left. Motor strength was 5/5 on the MRC scale. Reflexes were 2+ symmetrical and active. No pathological responses were noted. Sensory examination showed a diffuse decreased sensation to pinprick in the right upper extremity. Cerebellar function was normal. There was normal station and gait. Chest and cardiovascular evaluations were unremarkable. Heart sounds were normal. There were no extra sounds or murmurs. Palpable trigger points were noted in the right trapezius and right cervical and lumbar paraspinal musculature.,CLINICAL IMPRESSION: , Reveals a 19-year-old male suffering from a posttraumatic cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, secondary to traumatic injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on MM/DD/YYYY. In view of the persistent radicular complaints associated with the weakness, numbness, paraesthesia, and tingling as well as the objective sensory loss noted on today's evaluation as well as the non-specific nature of the radiculopathy, I have scheduled him for an EMG study on his right upper and right lower extremity in two week's time to rule out any nerve root irritation versus any peripheral nerve entrapment or plexopathy as the cause of his symptoms. Palpable trigger points were noted on today's evaluation. He is suffering from ongoing myofascitis. His treatment plan will consist of a series of trigger point injections to be initiated at his next follow up visit in two weeks' time. I have encouraged him to continue with his ongoing treatment program under your care and supervision. I will be following him in two weeks' time. Once again, thank you kindly for allowing me to participate in this patient's care and management.,Yours sincerely,,

xyz dcre abcdear dr xyzi pleasure seeing patient abc today mmddyyyy consultation unfortunate yearold righthanded male injured motor vehicle accident mmddyyyy driver automobile struck front passengers side patient sustained impact injuries neck lower back apparent head injury loss consciousness denied posttraumatic seizures taken hospital xrays taken apparently negative releasedat present time complains neck lower back pain radiating right arm right leg weakness numbness paraesthesia tingling right arm right leg difficulty bowel bladder function experience intermittent headaches associated neck pain associated symptomspast health injured prior motor vehicle accident mmddyyyy time recent injuries completely symptom free active therapy history hypertension diabetes heart disease neurological disorders ulcers tuberculosissocial history denies tobacco alcohol consumptionallergies known drug allergiescurrent medications nonefamily history otherwise noncontributoryfunctional inquiry otherwise noncontributoryreview diagnostic studies includes mri scan cervical spine dated mmddyyyy showed evidence disc bulging cc level mri scan lumbar spine mmddyyyy showed evidence disc herniation level well disc protrusion level disc herniations level disc protrusion ls levelphysical examination reveals alert oriented male normal language function vital signs blood pressure left arm sitting heart rate regular height feet inches weight pounds cranial nerve evaluation unremarkable pupils equal reactive funduscopic evaluation clear evidence nystagmus decreased range motion noted cervical lumbar regions significant degree tenderness spasm paraspinal musculature straight leg raising limited degrees right degrees left motor strength mrc scale reflexes symmetrical active pathological responses noted sensory examination showed diffuse decreased sensation pinprick right upper extremity cerebellar function normal normal station gait chest cardiovascular evaluations unremarkable heart sounds normal extra sounds murmurs palpable trigger points noted right trapezius right cervical lumbar paraspinal musculatureclinical impression reveals yearold male suffering posttraumatic cervical lumbar radiculopathy secondary traumatic injuries sustained motor vehicle accident mmddyyyy view persistent radicular complaints associated weakness numbness paraesthesia tingling well objective sensory loss noted todays evaluation well nonspecific nature radiculopathy scheduled emg study right upper right lower extremity two weeks time rule nerve root irritation versus peripheral nerve entrapment plexopathy cause symptoms palpable trigger points noted todays evaluation suffering ongoing myofascitis treatment plan consist series trigger point injections initiated next follow visit two weeks time encouraged continue ongoing treatment program care supervision following two weeks time thank kindly allowing participate patients care managementyours sincerely

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ, D.C.,Re: ABC,Dear Dr. XYZ:,I had the pleasure of seeing your patient, ABC, today MM/DD/YYYY in consultation. He is an unfortunate 19-year-old right-handed male who was injured in a motor vehicle accident on MM/DD/YYYY, where he was the driver of an automobile, which was struck on the front passenger's side. The patient sustained impact injuries to his neck and lower back. There was no apparent head injury or loss of consciousness and he denied any posttraumatic seizures. He was taken to Hospital, x-rays were taken, apparently which were negative and he was released.,At the present time, he complains of neck and lower back pain radiating into his right arm and right leg with weakness, numbness, paraesthesia, and tingling in his right arm and right leg. He has had no difficulty with bowel or bladder function. He does experience intermittent headaches associated with his neck pain with no other associated symptoms.,PAST HEALTH:, He was injured in a prior motor vehicle accident on MM/DD/YYYY. At the time of his most recent injuries, he was completely symptom free and under no active therapy. There is no history of hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, neurological disorders, ulcers or tuberculosis.,SOCIAL HISTORY: , He denies tobacco or alcohol consumption.,ALLERGIES: , No known drug allergies.,CURRENT MEDICATIONS: ,None.,FAMILY HISTORY: , Otherwise noncontributory.,FUNCTIONAL INQUIRY: , Otherwise noncontributory.,REVIEW OF DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES:, Includes an MRI scan of the cervical spine dated MM/DD/YYYY which showed evidence for disc bulging at the C6-C7 level. MRI scan of the lumbar spine on MM/DD/YYYY, showed evidence of a disc herniation at the L1-L2 level as well as a disc protrusion at the L2-L3 level with disc herniations at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 level and disc protrusion at the L5-S1 level.,PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: , Reveals an alert and oriented male with normal language function. Vital Signs: Blood pressure was 105/68 in the left arm sitting. Heart rate was 70 and regular. Height was 5 feet 8 inches. Weight was 182 pounds. Cranial nerve evaluation was unremarkable. Pupils were equal and reactive. Funduscopic evaluation was clear. There was no evidence for nystagmus. There was decreased range of motion noted in both the cervical and lumbar regions to a significant degree, with tenderness and spasm in the paraspinal musculature. Straight leg raising was limited to 45 degrees on the right and 90 degrees on the left. Motor strength was 5/5 on the MRC scale. Reflexes were 2+ symmetrical and active. No pathological responses were noted. Sensory examination showed a diffuse decreased sensation to pinprick in the right upper extremity. Cerebellar function was normal. There was normal station and gait. Chest and cardiovascular evaluations were unremarkable. Heart sounds were normal. There were no extra sounds or murmurs. Palpable trigger points were noted in the right trapezius and right cervical and lumbar paraspinal musculature.,CLINICAL IMPRESSION: , Reveals a 19-year-old male suffering from a posttraumatic cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, secondary to traumatic injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on MM/DD/YYYY. In view of the persistent radicular complaints associated with the weakness, numbness, paraesthesia, and tingling as well as the objective sensory loss noted on today's evaluation as well as the non-specific nature of the radiculopathy, I have scheduled him for an EMG study on his right upper and right lower extremity in two week's time to rule out any nerve root irritation versus any peripheral nerve entrapment or plexopathy as the cause of his symptoms. Palpable trigger points were noted on today's evaluation. He is suffering from ongoing myofascitis. His treatment plan will consist of a series of trigger point injections to be initiated at his next follow up visit in two weeks' time. I have encouraged him to continue with his ongoing treatment program under your care and supervision. I will be following him in two weeks' time. Once again, thank you kindly for allowing me to participate in this patient's care and management.,Yours sincerely,, ### Response: Orthopedic

XYZ, M.D. ,Suite 123, ABC Avenue ,City, STATE 12345 ,RE: XXXX, XXXX ,MR#: 0000000,Dear Dr. XYZ: ,XXXX was seen in followup in the Pediatric Urology Clinic. I appreciate you speaking with me while he was in clinic. He continues to have abdominal pain, and he had a diuretic renal scan, which indicates no evidence of obstruction and good differential function bilaterally. ,When I examined him, he seems to indicate that his pain is essentially in the lower abdomen in the suprapubic region; however, on actual physical examination, he seems to complain of pain through his entire right side. His parents have brought up the question of whether this could be gastrointestinal in origin and that is certainly an appropriate consideration. They also feel that since he has been on Detrol, his pain levels have been somewhat worse, and so, I have given them the option of stopping the Detrol initially. I think he should stay on MiraLax for management of his bowels. I would also suggest that he be referred to Pediatric Gastroenterology for evaluation. If they do not find any abnormalities from a gastrointestinal perspective, then the next step would be to endoscope his bladder and then make sure that he does not have any evidence of bladder anatomic abnormalities that is leading to this pain. ,Thank you for following XXXX along with us in Pediatric Urology Clinic. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. ,Sincerely yours,

xyz md suite abc avenue city state xxxx xxxx mr dear dr xyz xxxx seen followup pediatric urology clinic appreciate speaking clinic continues abdominal pain diuretic renal scan indicates evidence obstruction good differential function bilaterally examined seems indicate pain essentially lower abdomen suprapubic region however actual physical examination seems complain pain entire right side parents brought question whether could gastrointestinal origin certainly appropriate consideration also feel since detrol pain levels somewhat worse given option stopping detrol initially think stay miralax management bowels would also suggest referred pediatric gastroenterology evaluation find abnormalities gastrointestinal perspective next step would endoscope bladder make sure evidence bladder anatomic abnormalities leading pain thank following xxxx along us pediatric urology clinic questions please feel free contact sincerely

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ, M.D. ,Suite 123, ABC Avenue ,City, STATE 12345 ,RE: XXXX, XXXX ,MR#: 0000000,Dear Dr. XYZ: ,XXXX was seen in followup in the Pediatric Urology Clinic. I appreciate you speaking with me while he was in clinic. He continues to have abdominal pain, and he had a diuretic renal scan, which indicates no evidence of obstruction and good differential function bilaterally. ,When I examined him, he seems to indicate that his pain is essentially in the lower abdomen in the suprapubic region; however, on actual physical examination, he seems to complain of pain through his entire right side. His parents have brought up the question of whether this could be gastrointestinal in origin and that is certainly an appropriate consideration. They also feel that since he has been on Detrol, his pain levels have been somewhat worse, and so, I have given them the option of stopping the Detrol initially. I think he should stay on MiraLax for management of his bowels. I would also suggest that he be referred to Pediatric Gastroenterology for evaluation. If they do not find any abnormalities from a gastrointestinal perspective, then the next step would be to endoscope his bladder and then make sure that he does not have any evidence of bladder anatomic abnormalities that is leading to this pain. ,Thank you for following XXXX along with us in Pediatric Urology Clinic. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. ,Sincerely yours, ### Response: Pediatrics - Neonatal, Urology

XYZ, M.D.,RE: ABC,DOB: MM/DD/YYYY,Dear Dr. XYZ:,Thank you for your kind referral for patient ABC. The patient is being referred for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. The patient was just diagnosed with diabetes; however, he does not have any serious visual complaints at this time.,On examination, the patient is seeing 20/40 OD pinholing to 20/20. The vision in the left eye is 20/20 uncorrected. Applanation pressures are normal at 17 mmHg bilaterally. Visual fields are full to count fingers OU and there is no relative afferent pupillary defect. Slit lamp examination was within normal limits, other than trace to 1+ nuclear sclerosis OU. On dilated examination, the patient shows a normal cup-to-disc ratio that is symmetric bilaterally. The macula, vessels, and periphery are also within normal limits.,In conclusion, Mr. ABC does not show any evidence of diabetic retinopathy at this time. We recommended him to have his eyes dilated once a year. I have advised him to follow up with you for his regular check-ups. Again, thank you for your kind referral of Mr. ABC and we should check on him once a year at this time.,Sincerely,,

xyz mdre abcdob mmddyyyydear dr xyzthank kind referral patient abc patient referred evaluation diabetic retinopathy patient diagnosed diabetes however serious visual complaints timeon examination patient seeing od pinholing vision left eye uncorrected applanation pressures normal mmhg bilaterally visual fields full count fingers ou relative afferent pupillary defect slit lamp examination within normal limits trace nuclear sclerosis ou dilated examination patient shows normal cuptodisc ratio symmetric bilaterally macula vessels periphery also within normal limitsin conclusion mr abc show evidence diabetic retinopathy time recommended eyes dilated year advised follow regular checkups thank kind referral mr abc check year timesincerely

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ, M.D.,RE: ABC,DOB: MM/DD/YYYY,Dear Dr. XYZ:,Thank you for your kind referral for patient ABC. The patient is being referred for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. The patient was just diagnosed with diabetes; however, he does not have any serious visual complaints at this time.,On examination, the patient is seeing 20/40 OD pinholing to 20/20. The vision in the left eye is 20/20 uncorrected. Applanation pressures are normal at 17 mmHg bilaterally. Visual fields are full to count fingers OU and there is no relative afferent pupillary defect. Slit lamp examination was within normal limits, other than trace to 1+ nuclear sclerosis OU. On dilated examination, the patient shows a normal cup-to-disc ratio that is symmetric bilaterally. The macula, vessels, and periphery are also within normal limits.,In conclusion, Mr. ABC does not show any evidence of diabetic retinopathy at this time. We recommended him to have his eyes dilated once a year. I have advised him to follow up with you for his regular check-ups. Again, thank you for your kind referral of Mr. ABC and we should check on him once a year at this time.,Sincerely,, ### Response: Ophthalmology

XYZ, O.D.,RE: ABC,DOB: MM/DD/YYYY,Dear Dr. XYZ:,Thank you for your kind referral for patient ABC. Mr. ABC is being referred for evaluation of glaucoma. The patient states he has no visual complaints.,On examination, the patient's visual acuity is 20/20 bilaterally. The patient's visual fields are full to confrontation. Extraocular muscles are intact. There is no relative afferent pupillary defect and applanation pressures are 15 mmHg bilaterally. On slit lamp examination, the patient has a normal anterior segment with 1+ nuclear sclerosis. On dilated examination, the patient has a cup-to-disc ratio in the right eye of 0.4. Macula, vessels, and periphery were within normal limits. On the left eye, the patient has a cup-to-disc ratio of 0.3 and macula vessels and periphery are also within normal limits. On gonioscopy, the patient shows deep anterior chamber angle OU and is open to the ciliary body band 360 degrees.,In conclusion, my initial impression is that Mr. ABC does not have glaucoma. He has fairly symmetric and small cup-to-disc ratios OU. His intraocular pressures were within normal limits in our office today. I discussed at length with him the alternatives of observation versus continued work-up and testing. He seemed to understand very well and went with my recommendation to continue observation for now. We will take fundus photos of his optic nerves for future comparison, but I think given the lack of any strong findings suspicious for glaucoma, we will defer further testing at this time.,Should you have any specific questions or any other information that you think that I may not have included in this evaluation, please feel free to contact me. I have recommended him to follow up with you for continued examination, continued check-ups, and should you find any other abnormal findings, I would be happy to address those again.,Again, thank you for your referral of Mr. ABC.,Sincerely,,

xyz odre abcdob mmddyyyydear dr xyzthank kind referral patient abc mr abc referred evaluation glaucoma patient states visual complaintson examination patients visual acuity bilaterally patients visual fields full confrontation extraocular muscles intact relative afferent pupillary defect applanation pressures mmhg bilaterally slit lamp examination patient normal anterior segment nuclear sclerosis dilated examination patient cuptodisc ratio right eye macula vessels periphery within normal limits left eye patient cuptodisc ratio macula vessels periphery also within normal limits gonioscopy patient shows deep anterior chamber angle ou open ciliary body band degreesin conclusion initial impression mr abc glaucoma fairly symmetric small cuptodisc ratios ou intraocular pressures within normal limits office today discussed length alternatives observation versus continued workup testing seemed understand well went recommendation continue observation take fundus photos optic nerves future comparison think given lack strong findings suspicious glaucoma defer testing timeshould specific questions information think may included evaluation please feel free contact recommended follow continued examination continued checkups find abnormal findings would happy address againagain thank referral mr abcsincerely

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ, O.D.,RE: ABC,DOB: MM/DD/YYYY,Dear Dr. XYZ:,Thank you for your kind referral for patient ABC. Mr. ABC is being referred for evaluation of glaucoma. The patient states he has no visual complaints.,On examination, the patient's visual acuity is 20/20 bilaterally. The patient's visual fields are full to confrontation. Extraocular muscles are intact. There is no relative afferent pupillary defect and applanation pressures are 15 mmHg bilaterally. On slit lamp examination, the patient has a normal anterior segment with 1+ nuclear sclerosis. On dilated examination, the patient has a cup-to-disc ratio in the right eye of 0.4. Macula, vessels, and periphery were within normal limits. On the left eye, the patient has a cup-to-disc ratio of 0.3 and macula vessels and periphery are also within normal limits. On gonioscopy, the patient shows deep anterior chamber angle OU and is open to the ciliary body band 360 degrees.,In conclusion, my initial impression is that Mr. ABC does not have glaucoma. He has fairly symmetric and small cup-to-disc ratios OU. His intraocular pressures were within normal limits in our office today. I discussed at length with him the alternatives of observation versus continued work-up and testing. He seemed to understand very well and went with my recommendation to continue observation for now. We will take fundus photos of his optic nerves for future comparison, but I think given the lack of any strong findings suspicious for glaucoma, we will defer further testing at this time.,Should you have any specific questions or any other information that you think that I may not have included in this evaluation, please feel free to contact me. I have recommended him to follow up with you for continued examination, continued check-ups, and should you find any other abnormal findings, I would be happy to address those again.,Again, thank you for your referral of Mr. ABC.,Sincerely,, ### Response: Ophthalmology

XYZ, O.D.,RE: ABC,DOB: MM/DD/YYYY,Dear Dr. XYZ:,Thank you for your referral of patient ABC. The patient was referred for evaluation of cataracts bilaterally.,On examination, the patient was seeing 20/40 in her right eye and 20/50 in the left eye. Extraocular muscles were intact, visual fields were full to confrontation OU, and applanations are 12 mmHg bilaterally. There is no relative afferent pupillary defect. On slit lamp examination, lids and lashes were within normal limits. The conj is quiet. The cornea shows 1+ guttata bilaterally. The AC is deep and quiet and irises are within normal limits bilaterally. There is a dense 3 to 4+ nuclear sclerotic cataract in each eye. On dilated fundus examination, cup-to-disc ratio is 0.1 OU. The vitreous, macula, vessels, and periphery all appear within normal limits.,Impression: It appears that Ms. ABC' visual decline is caused by bilateral cataracts. She would benefit from having removed. The patient also showed some mild guttata OU indicating possible early Fuchs dystrophy. The patient should do well with cataract surgery and I have recommended this and she agreed to proceed with the first eye here shortly. I will keep you up to date of her progress and any new findings as we perform her surgery in each eye.,Again, thank you for your kind referral of this kind lady and I will be in touch with you.,Sincerely,,

xyz odre abcdob mmddyyyydear dr xyzthank referral patient abc patient referred evaluation cataracts bilaterallyon examination patient seeing right eye left eye extraocular muscles intact visual fields full confrontation ou applanations mmhg bilaterally relative afferent pupillary defect slit lamp examination lids lashes within normal limits conj quiet cornea shows guttata bilaterally ac deep quiet irises within normal limits bilaterally dense nuclear sclerotic cataract eye dilated fundus examination cuptodisc ratio ou vitreous macula vessels periphery appear within normal limitsimpression appears ms abc visual decline caused bilateral cataracts would benefit removed patient also showed mild guttata ou indicating possible early fuchs dystrophy patient well cataract surgery recommended agreed proceed first eye shortly keep date progress new findings perform surgery eyeagain thank kind referral kind lady touch yousincerely

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ, O.D.,RE: ABC,DOB: MM/DD/YYYY,Dear Dr. XYZ:,Thank you for your referral of patient ABC. The patient was referred for evaluation of cataracts bilaterally.,On examination, the patient was seeing 20/40 in her right eye and 20/50 in the left eye. Extraocular muscles were intact, visual fields were full to confrontation OU, and applanations are 12 mmHg bilaterally. There is no relative afferent pupillary defect. On slit lamp examination, lids and lashes were within normal limits. The conj is quiet. The cornea shows 1+ guttata bilaterally. The AC is deep and quiet and irises are within normal limits bilaterally. There is a dense 3 to 4+ nuclear sclerotic cataract in each eye. On dilated fundus examination, cup-to-disc ratio is 0.1 OU. The vitreous, macula, vessels, and periphery all appear within normal limits.,Impression: It appears that Ms. ABC' visual decline is caused by bilateral cataracts. She would benefit from having removed. The patient also showed some mild guttata OU indicating possible early Fuchs dystrophy. The patient should do well with cataract surgery and I have recommended this and she agreed to proceed with the first eye here shortly. I will keep you up to date of her progress and any new findings as we perform her surgery in each eye.,Again, thank you for your kind referral of this kind lady and I will be in touch with you.,Sincerely,, ### Response: Ophthalmology

XYZ, O.D.,RE: ABC,DOB: MM/DD/YYYY,Dear XYZ:,Thank you very much for your kind referral of Mrs. ABC who you referred to me for narrow angles and possible associated glaucoma. I examined Mrs. ABC initially on MM/DD/YYYY. At that time, she expressed a chief concern of occasional pain around her eye, but denied any flashing lights, floaters, halos, or true brow ache. She reports a family history of glaucoma in her mother, but is unsure of the specific kind. Her past ocular history has been fairly unremarkable. As you know, she has a history of non-insulin dependent diabetes. She is unaware of her last hemoglobin A1c levels, but reports a blood sugar of 158 taken on the morning of her appointment with me. She is followed by Dr. X here locally.,Upon examination, her visual acuity measured 20/20-1 in either eye with her glasses. Presenting intraocular pressures were14 mmHg in either eye at 2:03 p.m. Pupillary reactions, confrontational visual fields, and ocular motility were normal. The slit lamp exam revealed narrow anterior chambers and on gonioscopy only the buried anterior trabecular meshwork was visible in either eye, but the angle deepened with gonio-compression suggesting appositional and not synechial closure. I deferred the dilated portion of the exam on that day.,We proceeded with peripheral iridectomies and following this upon her most recent visit on MM/DD/YYYY, I was able to safely dilate her eyes as her chambers had deepened and the PIs were patent. I note that she has an increased CD ratio measuring 0.65 in the right eye and 0.7 in the left and although her FDT visual fields and GDX testing were normal at your office, she does have an enlarged blind spot in either eye on Humphrey visual fields and retinal tomography also shows some suspicious changes. Therefore, I feel she has sustained some optic nerve damage perhaps from intermittent angle closure in the past.,In summary, Mrs. ABC has a history of narrow angles not successfully treated with laser PIs. Her intraocular pressures have remained stable. I will continue to monitor her closely.,Thank you very much once again for allowing me to have shared in her care. If I can provide any additional information or be of further service, do let me know.,Sincerely,,

xyz odre abcdob mmddyyyydear xyzthank much kind referral mrs abc referred narrow angles possible associated glaucoma examined mrs abc initially mmddyyyy time expressed chief concern occasional pain around eye denied flashing lights floaters halos true brow ache reports family history glaucoma mother unsure specific kind past ocular history fairly unremarkable know history noninsulin dependent diabetes unaware last hemoglobin ac levels reports blood sugar taken morning appointment followed dr x locallyupon examination visual acuity measured either eye glasses presenting intraocular pressures mmhg either eye pm pupillary reactions confrontational visual fields ocular motility normal slit lamp exam revealed narrow anterior chambers gonioscopy buried anterior trabecular meshwork visible either eye angle deepened goniocompression suggesting appositional synechial closure deferred dilated portion exam daywe proceeded peripheral iridectomies following upon recent visit mmddyyyy able safely dilate eyes chambers deepened pis patent note increased cd ratio measuring right eye left although fdt visual fields gdx testing normal office enlarged blind spot either eye humphrey visual fields retinal tomography also shows suspicious changes therefore feel sustained optic nerve damage perhaps intermittent angle closure pastin summary mrs abc history narrow angles successfully treated laser pis intraocular pressures remained stable continue monitor closelythank much allowing shared care provide additional information service let knowsincerely

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ, O.D.,RE: ABC,DOB: MM/DD/YYYY,Dear XYZ:,Thank you very much for your kind referral of Mrs. ABC who you referred to me for narrow angles and possible associated glaucoma. I examined Mrs. ABC initially on MM/DD/YYYY. At that time, she expressed a chief concern of occasional pain around her eye, but denied any flashing lights, floaters, halos, or true brow ache. She reports a family history of glaucoma in her mother, but is unsure of the specific kind. Her past ocular history has been fairly unremarkable. As you know, she has a history of non-insulin dependent diabetes. She is unaware of her last hemoglobin A1c levels, but reports a blood sugar of 158 taken on the morning of her appointment with me. She is followed by Dr. X here locally.,Upon examination, her visual acuity measured 20/20-1 in either eye with her glasses. Presenting intraocular pressures were14 mmHg in either eye at 2:03 p.m. Pupillary reactions, confrontational visual fields, and ocular motility were normal. The slit lamp exam revealed narrow anterior chambers and on gonioscopy only the buried anterior trabecular meshwork was visible in either eye, but the angle deepened with gonio-compression suggesting appositional and not synechial closure. I deferred the dilated portion of the exam on that day.,We proceeded with peripheral iridectomies and following this upon her most recent visit on MM/DD/YYYY, I was able to safely dilate her eyes as her chambers had deepened and the PIs were patent. I note that she has an increased CD ratio measuring 0.65 in the right eye and 0.7 in the left and although her FDT visual fields and GDX testing were normal at your office, she does have an enlarged blind spot in either eye on Humphrey visual fields and retinal tomography also shows some suspicious changes. Therefore, I feel she has sustained some optic nerve damage perhaps from intermittent angle closure in the past.,In summary, Mrs. ABC has a history of narrow angles not successfully treated with laser PIs. Her intraocular pressures have remained stable. I will continue to monitor her closely.,Thank you very much once again for allowing me to have shared in her care. If I can provide any additional information or be of further service, do let me know.,Sincerely,, ### Response: Ophthalmology

XYZ,RE: ABC,MEDICAL RECORD#: 123,Dear Dr. XYZ:,I saw ABC back in Neuro-Oncology Clinic today. He comes in for an urgent visit because of increasing questions about what to do next for his anaplastic astrocytoma.,Within the last several days, he has seen you in clinic and once again discussed whether or not to undergo radiation for his left temporal lesion. The patient has clearly been extremely ambivalent about this therapy for reasons that are not immediately apparent. It is clear that his MRI is progressing and that it seems unlikely at this time that anything other than radiation would be particularly effective. Despite repeatedly emphasizing this; however, the patient still is worried about potential long-term side effects from treatment that frankly seem unwarranted at this particular time.,After seeing you in clinic, he and his friend again wanted to discuss possible changes in the chemotherapy regimen. They came in with a list of eight possible agents that they would like to be administered within the next two weeks. They then wanted another MRI to be performed and they were hoping that with the use of this type of approach, they might be able to induce another remission from which he can once again be spared radiation.,From my view, I noticed a man whose language has deteriorated in the week since I last saw him. This is very worrisome. Today, for the first time, I felt that there was a definite right facial droop as well. Therefore, there is no doubt that he is becoming symptomatic from his growing tumor. It suggests that he is approaching the end of his compliance curve and that the things may rapidly deteriorate in the near future.,Emphasizing this once again, in addition, to recommending steroids I once again tried to convince him to undergo radiation. Despite an hour, this again amazingly was not possible. It is not that he does not want treatment, however. Because I told him that I did not feel it was ethical to just put him on the radical regimen that him and his friend devised, we compromised and elected to go back to Temodar in a low dose daily type regimen. We would plan on giving 75 mg/sq m everyday for 21 days out of 28 days. In addition, we will stop thalidomide 100 mg/day. If he tolerates this for one week, we then agree that we would institute another one of the medications that he listed for us. At this stage, we are thinking of using Accutane at that point.,While I am very uncomfortable with this type of approach, I think as long as he is going to be monitored closely that we may be able to get away with this for at least a reasonable interval. In the spirit of compromise, he again consented to be evaluated by radiation and this time, seemed more resigned to the fact that it was going to happen sooner than later. I will look at this as a positive sign because I think radiation is the one therapy from which he can get a reasonable response in the long term.,I will keep you apprised of followups. If you have any questions or if I could be of any further assistance, feel free to contact me.,Sincerely,

xyzre abcmedical record dear dr xyzi saw abc back neurooncology clinic today comes urgent visit increasing questions next anaplastic astrocytomawithin last several days seen clinic discussed whether undergo radiation left temporal lesion patient clearly extremely ambivalent therapy reasons immediately apparent clear mri progressing seems unlikely time anything radiation would particularly effective despite repeatedly emphasizing however patient still worried potential longterm side effects treatment frankly seem unwarranted particular timeafter seeing clinic friend wanted discuss possible changes chemotherapy regimen came list eight possible agents would like administered within next two weeks wanted another mri performed hoping use type approach might able induce another remission spared radiationfrom view noticed man whose language deteriorated week since last saw worrisome today first time felt definite right facial droop well therefore doubt becoming symptomatic growing tumor suggests approaching end compliance curve things may rapidly deteriorate near futureemphasizing addition recommending steroids tried convince undergo radiation despite hour amazingly possible want treatment however told feel ethical put radical regimen friend devised compromised elected go back temodar low dose daily type regimen would plan giving mgsq everyday days days addition stop thalidomide mgday tolerates one week agree would institute another one medications listed us stage thinking using accutane pointwhile uncomfortable type approach think long going monitored closely may able get away least reasonable interval spirit compromise consented evaluated radiation time seemed resigned fact going happen sooner later look positive sign think radiation one therapy get reasonable response long termi keep apprised followups questions could assistance feel free contact mesincerely

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: XYZ,RE: ABC,MEDICAL RECORD#: 123,Dear Dr. XYZ:,I saw ABC back in Neuro-Oncology Clinic today. He comes in for an urgent visit because of increasing questions about what to do next for his anaplastic astrocytoma.,Within the last several days, he has seen you in clinic and once again discussed whether or not to undergo radiation for his left temporal lesion. The patient has clearly been extremely ambivalent about this therapy for reasons that are not immediately apparent. It is clear that his MRI is progressing and that it seems unlikely at this time that anything other than radiation would be particularly effective. Despite repeatedly emphasizing this; however, the patient still is worried about potential long-term side effects from treatment that frankly seem unwarranted at this particular time.,After seeing you in clinic, he and his friend again wanted to discuss possible changes in the chemotherapy regimen. They came in with a list of eight possible agents that they would like to be administered within the next two weeks. They then wanted another MRI to be performed and they were hoping that with the use of this type of approach, they might be able to induce another remission from which he can once again be spared radiation.,From my view, I noticed a man whose language has deteriorated in the week since I last saw him. This is very worrisome. Today, for the first time, I felt that there was a definite right facial droop as well. Therefore, there is no doubt that he is becoming symptomatic from his growing tumor. It suggests that he is approaching the end of his compliance curve and that the things may rapidly deteriorate in the near future.,Emphasizing this once again, in addition, to recommending steroids I once again tried to convince him to undergo radiation. Despite an hour, this again amazingly was not possible. It is not that he does not want treatment, however. Because I told him that I did not feel it was ethical to just put him on the radical regimen that him and his friend devised, we compromised and elected to go back to Temodar in a low dose daily type regimen. We would plan on giving 75 mg/sq m everyday for 21 days out of 28 days. In addition, we will stop thalidomide 100 mg/day. If he tolerates this for one week, we then agree that we would institute another one of the medications that he listed for us. At this stage, we are thinking of using Accutane at that point.,While I am very uncomfortable with this type of approach, I think as long as he is going to be monitored closely that we may be able to get away with this for at least a reasonable interval. In the spirit of compromise, he again consented to be evaluated by radiation and this time, seemed more resigned to the fact that it was going to happen sooner than later. I will look at this as a positive sign because I think radiation is the one therapy from which he can get a reasonable response in the long term.,I will keep you apprised of followups. If you have any questions or if I could be of any further assistance, feel free to contact me.,Sincerely, ### Response: Hematology - Oncology, Neurology

without difficulty, into the upper GI tract. The anatomy and mucosa of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, stomach, pylorus, and small bowel were all carefully inspected. All structures were visually normal in appearance. Biopsies of the distal duodenum, gastric antrum, and distal esophagus were taken and sent for pathological evaluation. The endoscope and insufflated air were slowly removed from the upper GI tract. A repeat look at the structures involved again showed no visible abnormalities, except for the biopsy sites.,The patient tolerated the procedure with excellent comfort and stable vital signs. After a recovery period in the Endoscopy Suite, the patient is discharged to continue recovering in the family's care at home. The family knows to follow up with me today if there are concerns about the patient's recovery,from the procedure. They will follow up with me later this week for biopsy and CLO test results so that appropriate further diagnostic and therapeutic plans can be made.,

without difficulty upper gi tract anatomy mucosa esophagus gastroesophageal junction stomach pylorus small bowel carefully inspected structures visually normal appearance biopsies distal duodenum gastric antrum distal esophagus taken sent pathological evaluation endoscope insufflated air slowly removed upper gi tract repeat look structures involved showed visible abnormalities except biopsy sitesthe patient tolerated procedure excellent comfort stable vital signs recovery period endoscopy suite patient discharged continue recovering familys care home family knows follow today concerns patients recoveryfrom procedure follow later week biopsy clo test results appropriate diagnostic therapeutic plans made

### Instruction: find the medical speciality for this medical test. ### Input: without difficulty, into the upper GI tract. The anatomy and mucosa of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, stomach, pylorus, and small bowel were all carefully inspected. All structures were visually normal in appearance. Biopsies of the distal duodenum, gastric antrum, and distal esophagus were taken and sent for pathological evaluation. The endoscope and insufflated air were slowly removed from the upper GI tract. A repeat look at the structures involved again showed no visible abnormalities, except for the biopsy sites.,The patient tolerated the procedure with excellent comfort and stable vital signs. After a recovery period in the Endoscopy Suite, the patient is discharged to continue recovering in the family's care at home. The family knows to follow up with me today if there are concerns about the patient's recovery,from the procedure. They will follow up with me later this week for biopsy and CLO test results so that appropriate further diagnostic and therapeutic plans can be made., ### Response: Gastroenterology, Surgery