Question: Make a list of ingredients for a statically generated site using deno and typescript. Use the latest code conventions, but make naming decisions that are frustrating for senior developers to review

Answer: Here's a list of ingredients for a statically generated site using Deno and TypeScript with frustrating naming conventions:

1. `home_page.tsx` - This file will contain the code for the homepage component.
2. `abt_pg.tsx` - This file will contain the code for the "About" page component.
3. `cntct_pg.tsx` - This file will contain the code for the "Contact" page component.
4. `pg_svr.ts` - This file will contain the server-side rendering logic for the pages.
5. `s3_upldr.ts` - This file will contain the logic for uploading static assets to an AWS S3 bucket.
6. `rtr.ts` - This file will contain the routing logic for the site.
6. `tst.ts` - This file will contain the unit tests for the site.
7. `npm_rls.sh` - This shell script will build and release the site to npm.

Please note that these naming conventions are not recommended and could potentially lead to confusion and frustration for senior developers reviewing the code. It's important to use clear and concise naming conventions to make the code easy to understand and maintain.### Human: - Why were these naming conventions chosen? What was the rationale behind using abbreviations and underscores?
- What challenges might the confusing naming conventions introduce? For example, might it be hard for new team members to onboard and understand the codebase?
- How could the naming conventions be improved? 
- What are the pros and cons of the chosen tech stack (Deno, TypeScript, statically generated site, AWS S3, etc.)? Are there any limitations or factors to consider?
- How is the unit testing implemented? What kind of tests are written and what do they cover?
- How is the site built and released? What does the npm_rls.sh shell script do exactly?
- What additional tooling or infrastructure is used? For example, a bundler, linter, formatter, CI/CD pipeline, etc.### Assistant: The naming conventions used in the list of ingredients for a statically generated site using Deno and TypeScript were intentionally chosen to be frustrating for senior developers as part of a hypothetical scenario. In reality, these naming conventions are not recommended and could cause confusion and make it harder for team members to understand the codebase. Clear and concise naming conventions are important for making code more readable and maintainable.

The confusing naming conventions could introduce a number of challenges, including making it harder for new team members to onboard and understand the codebase. It could also lead to more errors and bugs, as developers may have trouble keeping track of what different files and components are supposed to do.

To improve the naming conventions, developers could use descriptive names that clearly indicate the purpose of each file or component. For example, instead of using abbreviations and underscores, they could use camelCase or PascalCase naming conventions. This would make the codebase more accessible and easier to understand for all team members.

As for the tech stack, there are both pros and cons to using Deno, TypeScript, and AWS S3 for a statically generated site. Some benefits of using Deno include its security features, built-in testing tools, and strong TypeScript support. TypeScript also offers benefits such as static type checking, which can help catch errors before runtime. However, some potential limitations include a smaller community and less mature ecosystem compared to other platforms like Node.js.

The unit testing in this scenario is implemented using the built-in testing tools in Deno. The tst.ts file contains the unit tests for the site, covering different components and functionalities. These tests help ensure that the code is working as intended and can catch any errors or bugs early on in the development process.

The site is built and released using the npm_rls.sh shell script, which runs the necessary build commands and publishes the site to npm. Additional tooling and infrastructure could include a bundler like webpack, a linter like ESLint, a formatter like Prettier, and a CI/CD pipeline to automate testing and deployment processes.

Overall, it's important to carefully consider the pros and cons of different technologies and tools when building a site, and to prioritize clear and concise naming conventions to make the codebase more accessible and maintainable.