Datasets:
FpOliveira
commited on
Commit
•
c1e71da
1
Parent(s):
782f036
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -9,7 +9,16 @@ size_categories:
|
|
9 |
---
|
10 |
## TuPI dataset statistics
|
11 |
|
12 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
----
|
14 |
| Label | Count |
|
15 |
|----------------------|--------|
|
@@ -45,9 +54,9 @@ A framework inspired by Vargas et al. (2022) and Fortuna (2017) was adhered to b
|
|
45 |
* A high level of academic attainment comprising individuals with master’s degrees, doctoral candidates, and holders of doctoral degrees.
|
46 |
* Expertise in fields of study closely aligned with the focus and objectives of our research.
|
47 |
|
48 |
-
The subsequent table provides a concise summary of the annotators' profiles and qualifications (Table
|
49 |
|
50 |
-
**Table
|
51 |
|
52 |
| Annotator | Gender | Education | Political | Color |
|
53 |
|--------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|------------|--------|
|
|
|
9 |
---
|
10 |
## TuPI dataset statistics
|
11 |
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
|
14 |
+
The TuPi dataset stands as an extensive compilation of annotated texts meticulously crafted to discern hate speech across diverse social networks.
|
15 |
+
Comprising 10,000 unpublished documents sourced from Twitter, this repository offers a refined presentation of the TuPi
|
16 |
+
dataset tailored for adept handling in both binary and multiclass classification tasks.
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
Table 1 provides a detailed breakdown of the dataset, delineating the volume of data based on the occurrence of aggressive speech and the manifestation of hate speech within the documents
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
**Table 1 - Count of documents for categories non-aggressive and aggressive.**
|
21 |
+
|
22 |
----
|
23 |
| Label | Count |
|
24 |
|----------------------|--------|
|
|
|
54 |
* A high level of academic attainment comprising individuals with master’s degrees, doctoral candidates, and holders of doctoral degrees.
|
55 |
* Expertise in fields of study closely aligned with the focus and objectives of our research.
|
56 |
|
57 |
+
The subsequent table provides a concise summary of the annotators' profiles and qualifications (Table 3).
|
58 |
|
59 |
+
**Table 3 – Annotators’ profiles and qualifications.**
|
60 |
|
61 |
| Annotator | Gender | Education | Political | Color |
|
62 |
|--------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|------------|--------|
|