Claim: In the judgment of the Environmental Defence Society Inc v New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd case, one of the policies of the NZCPS similarly stated that adverse effects of activities were to be avoided on outstanding natural features and outstanding natural landscapes, and the majority held that "avoid" meant "not allow" or "prevent the occurrence of," in addition, the majority also decided that consideration of alternative sites may be necessary.
Evidence: Policy 15 of the NZCPS similarly stated that adverse effects of activities were to be avoided on outstanding natural features and outstanding natural landscapes. The majority held that "avoid" meant "not allow" or "prevent the occurrence of". The majority also decided that a consideration of alternative sites may be necessary; although, '"This will be determined by the nature and circumstances of the particular site-specific plan change application."