Update README.md

README.md

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ This test is designed around breaking expectations. It consists of a common math
 Poems. Model passes each poem test for writing coherently and in rhyme. 1 point for each poem. 6 in total.
 	
 ## S-test:
-Stylized writing. Models are asked to explain a concept in a distinct writing style or as if they are a character. Up to 1 point for each style. Models are penalized for failing to explain the concept or to keep the style all the way through the explaination. 8 in total.
+Stylized writing. Models are asked to explain a concept in a distinct writing style or as if they are a character. Up to 1 point for each style. Models are penalized for failing to explain the concept or to keep the style all the way through the explaination. 8 in total. **Note:** not very reliable due to large human factor(±1). Take with a grain of salt.
 
 # What does each of the tests measure I dont understand111!!!11!
 BCD=following commands
@@ -38,4 +38,8 @@ What they show is quite interesting:
 - Cheater meme model(una-cybertron) was somewhat creative, but braindead
 
 # More tests?
-Feel free to suggest more models for testing by opening new discussion. Mention model name, size and why do you want to test it.
+Feel free to suggest more models for testing by opening new discussion. Mention model name, size and why do you want to test it.
+
+# Limitations
+- All tests were only done once. 
+- Human factor plays a huge role in SP tests. After redoing some of the tests I noticed ±1 variation for S-test and ±0.5 variation for P-test. (Xwin is likely underrated and Spicyboros is likely overrated in S-test.)