AjayMukundS/Indian_Legal_NER_Dataset huggingface dataset:
A perusal of the FSL report Ex.PY as regards the .32 inch revolver, which was recovered in the case, it has been stated that chemical CRA No. D-1026-DB of 2011 and CRA No. D-1046-DB of 2011 and -42- Murder Reference No. 6 of 2011 examination of barrel wash of .32 inch revolver No. FG-2917 marked W/2 indicates that it had been used in firing.
Hence, after change of definition of "land" as per Section 2(7) of W.B.L.R. Act, the non-agricultural land recorded in the R.S. Khanda Khatians as "Akrishi Proja" originated from "Maliki" or "Madhyaswatwadhikari" khatians now recorded as raiyat in W.B.L.R. Act shall be accounted for in calculation of the ceiling excess area of a family with effect from 15-2-71 as the amended Section 2(7) comes effective from 7-8-69.
Criminal Appeal Nos. of 2001 [arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.2724-25/2000] filed by the State of Kerala are dismissed.

























IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.	      OF 2001 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1522/2000)
T.T.Antony								 ... Appellant 			Versus State of Kerala & Ors.					     ... Respondents W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.	   OF 2001 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.8840/2000)
if	such flexibility  does not jeopardize Government  or	 administra- tion,  administration should be graceful enough	 to  respond and acknowledge the flexibility of human mind and  attitude.
[1181BC, 1183C, B]
1176     Air India etc. etc. v. Nergesh Meerza & Ors. etc.  etc.,
[1982] 1 S.C.R. 438, referred to.
    5.
Sub-section (1) minus the proviso thereto reads as hereunder:
 "1. Subject to the Limits of Liability the Company will indemnify the insured against all sums including claimant's cost and expenses which the insured shall become legally liable to pay in respect of  (i) death or bodily injury to any person caused by or arising out of the use (including the loading and/or unloading) of the Motor Vehicle.
[1968]
1 S.C.R.  260; Dhulabhai  and others  v. The State of Madhya Pradesh and  another [1968]  3 S.C.R. 662 and Union of India v. A. V. Narasimhalu [1970] 2 S.C.R. 145. referred to.
     (2) In  the present  case it  is clear  that  what	 the plaintiff, respondents	wanted to prevent was the threatened breach of  their  right	 which	flowed	from  the  agreement entered into between the derecognised union and the company.
Although this rule played a role in the devel- opment of the doctrine of fundamental breach, the continued validity of the rule was ac- knowledged when the doctrine was rejected by the House. of Lords in Suissee Atlantigue Societed' 766 Armement Maritime S.A.v.N.V. Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale, [1967] 1 A.C. 361 at 393,412- 413,427-428, 430.
Mr. Gavnekar submitted that the decisions in the case of (i) Mahibubi (supra), (ii) Bashir Abbas (supra), (iii) Lakhanlal Purohit (supra) and (iv) Keshav N. Bharti (supra) are rendered by the learned Single Judges and if this Court intends to take a different view, the matter should be referred to a larger Bench.
The report of the Inspection Team was placed before the State Level Standing Committee and the Committee in its meeting held on 24-2-2000 examined the relative merits of the application of the 1st respondent society and that of the Hussaini Educational Society, Nellore, as per the guidelines issued in G.O. Ms. No.398, Education, dated 4-12-1987 and keeping in view the report of the physical verification submitted by the Inspection Team.
CITATION:
 1977 AIR 2185		  1978 SCR  (1) 222  1977 SCC  (4) 137  CITATOR INFO :
 APR	    1978 SC  47	 (6,10,15)
 E	    1980 SC 962	 (6,44,64,66,67,68,99,102,103,1  RF	    1992 SC 604	 (96,97)


ACT:
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Ss. 397 and 482-Scope of.
Interlocutory  order--What  is-Order compelling	 persons  to face  trial  Without  proper  application  of  mind  by
In Dilip Kumar Sharma v. State of M.P., this Court was not concerned with the question of the vires of Section 303, but Sarkaria, J., in his concurring judgment, described the vast sweep of that Section by saying that "the section is Draconian in severity, relentless and inexorable in operation" [SCC para 22, p. 567: SCC (Cri) p. 92].
This Court in Statesman (P) Ltd. v. H.R. Deb104 had an occasion to examine the question who is a 'judicial officer' and Hidayatullah, C.J. speaking for the Constitution Bench answered the same thus : (SCR p. 620) 43 (1994) 3 SCC 440: JT (1994) 1 SC 290 104 (1968) 3 SCR 614: AIR 1968 SC 1495
It is true that the two writ petitions Nos. 916/1961 and 918/1961 filed by the appellants Rai, Ramkrishna & Ors. and M/s. Road Transport Co., Dhanbad & Ors. respectively in the High Court at Patna along with 18 others under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution had challenged the validity of the whole of the Act.
[53 B]
Salaman v. Secretary of State for India, [1966] I K.B.	613,
State  of Saurashtra v. Menon Haji Ismail, [1960]  1  S.C.R.
537 and Secretary of State in Council for India v.  Kamachee Boye Sahaba, [1859] 13 Moore P.C. 22, referred to.
Before us a purported minute of the meeting dated 27.10.1993 has been placed which is in the following terms: "It was decided that objection/ submission are to be given before the Krishnaunni Commission appointed by the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala and it may be filed jointly or severally by the members of the Managing Committee after consulting with Devaswom Advocate Shri K.P. Dandapani of Ernakulam.
PW­8, Ms.Shefali Barnala Tandon in her evidence has proved the statements of child N and M recorded by her U/s 164 Cr.P.C as Ex.PW8/Band Ex.PW8/C.  
 U/s 7 & 8 POCSO Act r/w Section 354 IPC Page 9 of 31 SC No.122/2013: FIR No.146/2013: PS Ashok Vihar: State V/s Sundar DOD: 23.04.2015 13.
This appears clearly from the judgments of Lord Atkin (at p. 157; p. 491), Lord Thankerton (at p. 158; p. 

 493), Lord Macmillan (at p. 159; p. 498) and Lord Wright (at p. 162; p. 505) in The Cristina, (1938) 60 Ll.L.Rep. 147; [1938] A.C. 485.
ORIGINAL SIDE Present:
The Hon'ble Justice Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay And The Hon'ble Justice Tapan Mukherjee A.P.D. No. 179 of 2001 G.A. No. 597 of 2008 C.S. No. 216 of 1996                               Oriental Bank of Commerce                                         Versus                                Santosh Kumar Agarwal
Dr. Shiv Prasad, Sr. Resident AIIMS hospital is PW9 who conducted the postmortem of the body of deceased Hardeep and got exhibited his report Ex.PW9/A and also deposed regarding his subsequent opinion with respect of knife in question. 

State vs. Talewar & Ors. 

FIR No. 139/08 8/26 PW9 has been duly cross examined by counsel for both the accused persons. 

14.
The accused/applicant is arrested by the Police Station Sanawad AJK, District Khargone in Crime No.410/2014 under sections 370(a), 376(d), 376(f), 372, 479, 419, 366, 366(a),373,493,347 of IPC and Section 3(1)
(xii),3(2)(v), 5/6 of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities)Act and Sections 3/4, 16/17 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
Sub-clause 4 of Regulation 8 reads as follows :
"Reg. 8(4) The Bureau RC shall invite comments/recommendations on the applications referred to in sub-regulation (3) from the follow-ing, namely :
(i) the State Government concerned ;
(ii) the affiliating University/State Board of Technical Education;
(iii) Bureaus MPCD;
(iv) Bureau BOS;
(v) Bureau RA;
(vi) the Regional Office."
After the new state of Bombay  was	 constituted with   territories  drawn  from	 various   existing   States including  Hyderabad, under the States	Reorganisation	Act,
1956,  equation	 of  posts and	determination  of  inter  se seniority  was	done by the Allocated  Government  Servants'
(Absorption,  Seniority.   Pay and Allowance)  Rules,  1957.
Vivian Bose, J., however, speaking for a Constitution Bench of this Court in Rajnarain Singh vs. The Chairman, Patna Administration Committee, Patna and Another [1955 (1) SCR 290] analysed the opinions of different learned Judges in Re: Delhi Laws Act (supra) and culled out the majority view thus:
"..that an executive authority can be authorized to modify either existing or future laws but not in any essential feature.
A.C.   88,	 Attorney  General  for	 Ontario  v.
     Attorney General  for the	Dominion and  the Distillers      and Brewers Association,[1896] A.C. 348, State of Uttar      Pradesh and  Others v.  Hindustan Aluminium Corporation      Ltd. and Ors., [1979] 3 SCR 709, G. K. Krishnan etc. v.
     The State	of Tamil Nadu and Anr. etc. [1975] 2 SCR 715      @ 721,  Commonwealth of  Australia v. Bank of New South      Wales [1950] A.C. 235 referred to.
M. F. A. 337/78 is against the common order of the Calicut Tribunal in O. A. Nos. 176/74 and 211/74, holding that the teak plantations involved in the two applications (894 acres in O. A. 176 and 343.95 hectares in O. A. 211) are eligible for exemption under Section 2 (f) (1) (i) (C) of the Vesting Act.
Witness DW9 Sh. N.V.N Krishnan who was posted as Inspector of Police with CBI, ACB, New Delhi in January 2009 had identified his signatures on the seizure memo Ex.DW9/A vide which he had seized document related to this case during 06/11 26 of 95 a search conducted at the office premise of accused no.1 Sh. Anil Kumar Saini.
Writ petitions before the Allahabad High Court were heard and allowed by the Division Bench (M. Katju and Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, JJ.) vide common judgment and order dated January 27, 2004 reported in Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. State of U.P. (connected with Moser Baer India Ltd. v. State of U.P.). 

4. State of U.P., being aggrieved, filed special leave petitions before the apex court.
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

Crl Mc No. 1622 of 2006()


1. T.R.Ajayan, S/O. O.Raman,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. M.Ravindran,
                       ...       Respondent

2. Mrs. Nirmala Dinesh, W/O. Dinesh,

                For Petitioner  :Sri.A.Kumar

                For Respondent  :Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.R.Raman
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.K.Mohanan

 Dated :07/01/2008

 O R D E R
In the Court of Sh. Vimal Kumar Yadav, Additional Sessions 
           Judge­II, South District, Saket Court, Delhi.

Session Case No. 59/2013

In the matter of :

State 

Versus

1.  Ram Srijan Bhagat Kori,
S/o late Chatu Ram,
R/o H. No.619, Gali No.7B,
Shambhav Colony, Mandi Pahari, Delhi.


2.  Chanderwati Devi 
W/o Ram Srijan Bhagat Kori,
R/o H. No.619, Gali No.7B,
Shambhav Colony, Mandi Pahari, Delhi.


3.  Urmila,
D/o Ram Srijan Bhagat Kori,
R/o H. No.619, Gali No.7B,
Shambhav Colony, Mandi Pahari, Delhi.

Fir No.                  : 11/2012.
Police Station           : Fatehpur Beri.
Under section.           : 308/34 Ipc.

Date of assignment       : 23.03.2013.
Reserved for order on   : 17.05.2014.
Date of decision         : 31.05.2014.

State v. Ram Srijan Bhagat & Ors., Fir No. 11/2012.    Page 1 of 20
                                           Judgment
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

WP(C).No. 15339 of 2007(A)


1. Vikram Sarabhai Educational Trust &
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. University Of Calicut,
                       ...       Respondent

2. The Vice Chancellor,

                For Petitioner  :Sri.George Poonthottam

                For Respondent  :Sri.Alexander Thomas,Sc,Kpsc

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.Balakrishnan Nair
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K.Basheer
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.N.Ravindran

 Dated :23/05/2008

 O R D E R
                         K.Balakrishnan Nair,
                               A.K.Basheer &
                            P.N.Ravindran, Jj.
                     -----------------------------------------
                      W.P.(C) No.15339 Of 2007-A
                     -----------------------------------------
                         Dated     23rd May, 2008.

                                 Judgment
Honble Sri Justice Ashutosh Mohunta And Honble Sri Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy                      

M.A.C.M.A. No.2332 Of 2011 and batch   

02-04-2014 

M/s. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited,Rep. by its Deputy Manager 
(Legal), 3-6-111/8, Ii Floor, Far East Plaza, Street No.18, Himayath Nagar,
Hyderabad.       -....Appellant.

Smt. Manju Devi, W/o.Late Yogendar Kumar Rai, Age 42 Years, Household, H. No.3-   
5-1415/A, Barkathpura, Hyderabad and four others. - -Respondents.

Counsel for Appellant/s:Mr. T. Mahender Rao.
                        Mr. Kota Subba Rao. 
      .
Counsel for Respondent/s        : Mr. R.G. Siva Kumar.
                                  Mr. P. Ramakrishna Reddy.
                                 Mr. T. Mahender Rao.

<Gist   :

>Head Note:    

?Cases referred :        

1.  (2009) 6 Scc 121
2.  2004 Acj 1  
3.  2006 (6) Alt 147
4.  Air 2012 Sc 3104 
5.  Manu/Hp/1314/2010   
6.  2013 Acj 145 
7.  2004 13 Scc 224 
8.  2010 (4) Ald 531 (Db)
9.  2013 Acj 1403 

Honble Sri Justice Ashutosh Mohunta           
And  
Honble Sri Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy             

M.A.C.M.A. Nos.2332 Of 2011 & 1898 Of 2012     

This Court made the following :


Common Judgment
*            In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi

                                                 Date of Reserve: December 11, 2008
                                                    Date of Order: February 18, 2009
+ Cm(M) 133/1999
%                                                                      18.02.2009
     Raghbir Singh                                              ...Petitioner
     Through: Mr. K.D. Kaushal, Advocate

         Versus

         Sheela Wanti & Anr                                   ...Respondents
         Through: Mr. G.D. Chopra, Advocate

         Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra

1.       Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
         judgment?                                            Yes.

2.       To be referred to the reporter or not?                                Yes.

3.       Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?                        Yes.


         Judgment
In the Court of Ms. Kaveri Baweja
           Additional Sessions Judge­ Special Ftc - 2 (Central)
                            Tis Hazari Courts: Delhi. 


Sessions Case No. : 09/13
Unique Id No. : 02401R0553072012


State         versus                        Gaurav Maggo 
                                            S/o Sh.Ashok Kumar Maggo
                                            R/o C­83, Gandhi Vihar,
                                            Delhi. 


Case arising out of:


Fir No.               :      111/12
Police Station        :      Timarpur
Under Section         :      376/417 Ipc


Judgment reserved on                        : 17.02.2014
Judgment pronounced on                      : 22.02.2014


                                    Judgment
In The Court Of The Xii Addl. City Civil And
    Sessions Judge (CCH.No.27), At Bangalore.


Present:Sri.Bhairappa Shivaling Naik, B.Com.,LL.B.(Spl),
         Xii Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge,
         Bangalore.

        Dated: This The 23Rd Day Of July 2015

                      O.S.No.1401/2010

       Plaintiff:-      Shri.Ramaraj,
                        S/o.Sri.Kempaiah,
                        Age 68 years,
                        R/at: Mathrusree,
                        No.21/32, 1st Main,
                        5th Cross, Bhyataranapura,
                        Mysore Road,
                        Bangalore -560 026.

                                 (By Sri. Ashok B.Patil,
                                             Advocate)

                        -Vs-

       Defendants:-     1.   Thimmegowda,
                             S/o.Mariyappa,
                             Aged about 47 years,
                             R/at No.101/B,
                             20th Main Road,
                             Marenahalli,
                             Vijayanagar,
                             Bangalore-560 040.
                                     2              O.S.No.1401/2010




                          2.      Smt.Mahadevamma,
                                  w/o. Chunetinikar
                                  aged about 61 years,
                                  R/at.Basaweshawara
                                  Nilaya, Manjunatha
                                  Nagara, Kytsandra Post,
                                  Tumkur.

                                  Or

                                  No.3, Barline,
                                  Dar Quarters,
                                  Tumkur.

                          3.      Smt.M.Saroja,
                                  w/o.K.C.Lakshminarayana,
                                  aged about 51 years,
                                  r/at. No.R-23,
                                  Car Police Quarters,
                                  Sirsi Circle,
                                  Mysore road,
                                  Bengaluru -560018.

                                           (Deft.1 by Sri.CS
                                  Defts.2 &3 by
                                  Sri.C.Venkatesha-
                                  Advocates)

Date of Institution of the suit         :   26/02/2010
Nature of the suit                      :   Declaration and
                                            Mandatory Injunction
Date of commencement of
recording of the evidence               :   13/10/2011
                                 3              O.S.No.1401/2010



Date on which the Judgment was
pronounced                      :    23/07/2015
Total Duration                 Years   Months   Days
                             :    05     04      27



                            (Bhairappa Shivaling Naik)
                         Xii Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge,
                                     Bangalore



                       J U D G M E N T
S. S. Sangwan vs. Rajender Kumar Bansal             Cc. No. 3116/12

    In The Court Of Ms. Swati Katiyar, Metropolitan
      Magistrate-05 (Ni Act), Dwarka Courts, Delhi

Cc No. 3116/12
Id No. 02405R0227002010

Sh. S. S. Sangwan
s/o Sh. P. S. Sangwan
R/o H. No. Rzf2/113,
Gali No. 5, F2 Block,
Nasirpur Road, Mahavir Enclave Ph-I,
Palam, New Delhi-110045
                                                 ...........Complainant
                                 Vs.
Sh. Rajender Kumar Bansal
s/o Sh. Tulsi Ram Bansal
r/o-426, Paschim Puri
Sikendra, Agra, Up-282007
                                                 ..................Accused

Date of Institution        : 15.09.2010
Offence Complained of      : u/s 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Plea of Accused            : Not Guilty
Date of Reserving order    : 18.12.2013
Date of Decision           : 04.01.2014
Decision                   : Acquitted

Judgment
In The Court Of The Ix Addl. Small Causes And
          Addl. Mact., Bangalore, (Scch-7)

        Dated this, the 29th day of September, 2015.


Present : Smt.Indira Mailswamy Chettiyar,
                            B.Com., Ll.B. (Spl.),L.L.M.,
          Ix Addl. Small Causes Judge & Xxxiv Acmm,
          Court of Small Causes,
          Member, Mact-7, Bangalore.

                     M.V.C.No.7875/2012


1. Smt.Ningamma @ Lingamma,                 ..... Petitioners
W/o Late B.H.Gangadharaiah,
Aged about 62 years,
R/at No.45, 2nd Main Road,
Raghava Nagar,
New Timber Yard Layout,
Bangalore-560026.

Her Native Place Address :
No.86, Byadagere,
Kunigal Taluk,
Tumkur District.

(By Sri. Venkatesha Naidu. R., Adv.,)

                                      V/s
                                            .....Respondents
1. District Health Family
Welfare Officer (D.H.W.O.),
C/o G.V.K. Emergency
Management & Research Institute,
S.T.D.C. Housing Board Colony,
Opp. Govt. Unani Medical College,
G.M.S. Compound,
Magadi Road,
Bangalore-560079.

2. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Regional Office,
                                               M.V.C.No.7875/2012
                                 2                    (Scch-7)

6th Floor, Krishi Bhavan,
Hudson Circle,
Bangalore-560001.

(Policy No.241400/31/11/01/00014183
Valid from 16.11.2011 to 15.11.2012)

3. Thammaiah S/o Late Rangaiaha,
No.30, 8th Main, 9th Cross,
Agrahara Dasarahalli,
Magadi Road,
Bangalore-79.

(Owner of Motor Bike bearing No.KA-02-
Ee-1890)

(R-1 and R-3 Exparte)
(R-2 By Sri. L. Sreekanta Rao, Adv.,)

                            Judgment
Patna High Court Cr. App (Db) No.404 of 2008 dt.16-07-2012          1




              In The High Court Of Judicature At Patna
                 Criminal Appeal (Db) No.404 of 2008
        ===================================================
 Manish Kumar son of Parsuram Thakur, resident of village Repura, P.S.Sakara, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State Of Bihar ... .... Respondent/s with Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 409 of 2008 =================================================== Chandan Kumar son of Ram Binoy Thakur, resident of village Harpur, P.S.Sakra, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s with Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 426 of 2008 =================================================== Nagendra Mishra son of Gaya Mishra,resident of village Sutihara, P.S.Mushahari, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s with Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 473 of 2008 =================================================== Pankaj Kumar Thakur son of Ram Chandra Thakur, resident of village Repura, P.S.Sakara, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s with Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 607 of 2008 =================================================== Nanhaki Chaudhary son of Maksudan Chaudhary, resident of village Dhali, P.S. Sakara, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s All the above five appeals are against the judgment of conviction dated 19.03.2008 and order of sentence dated 28.03.2008 passed by Sri Ram Chandra Sahni, Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. Ii, Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No. 325 of 2002. 

 ------------
 Appearance :
 (In Cr.App (Db) No.404 of 2008) For the Appellant/s :Mr.Saravan Kumar, Sr. Advocate Mr.Pramod Kumar (In Cr. App (Db) No.409 of 2008) For the Appellant/s :Mr Saravan Kumar, Sr. Advocate Patna High Court Cr. App (Db) No.404 of 2008 dt.16-07-2012 2 Mr. Ambuj Nayan Chaubey Mr. Siddharth Harsh (In Cr.App (Db) No.426 of 2008) For the Appellant/s :Mr.Kailash Nath Diwakar,Advocate (In Cr. App (Db) No.473 of 2008) For the Appellant/s :Mr. Shakeel Ahmad Khan,Sr.Advocate (In Cr. App (Db) No.607 of 2008) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Punam Srivastava Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Singh Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s: Mr. Ashwini Kumar Sinha, App (in all the 5 appeals) =================================================== Coram: Honourable Mr. Justice Shyam Kishore Sharma And Honourable Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal Oral Judgment
The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose And The Hon'Ble Sri Vilas V. Afzulpurkar                

Writ Appeal No.1309 Of 2012      

4-1-2013

K. Raja Rao 

A.P. Industrial Development Corporation Limited (State Government Undertaking)
Rep. by its Managing Director Parishrama Bhavan, Fathemaidan Road  Hyderabad and   
another

Counsel For Appellant: Sri E. Manohar, Senior Counsel for Sri V. Kishore      

Counsel For Respondent No.1: Sri S. Sreenivasa Reddy           Counsel For Respondent No.2: G.P. for Revenue <Gist >Head Note:    
?Citations:  
1. Air 1979 Sc 102 
2. Air 1971 Ap 169. 
3. (2006) 9 Scc 617 
4. Air 1999 Sc 1305 
5. Aplj 1984(2) 173
6. Air 1933 Pc 63 
7. Air 1976 Sc 1309 8.1993 Supp.(1) Scc 499  
9. (1979) 1 Scc 193 
10. Air 2006 Sc 1874  
11. 1939 Ac 439 
12. (1918) 2 Kb 833 Judgment
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras

Date:  16.02.2015

Coram

The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice R.Subbiah

	  		      A.Nos.6809 to 6811 of 2014
and
A.Nos.6948 & 6949 of 2014
and
A.D.No.30964, 30779, 
29500, 40981 of 2014
and
A.D.No.38355 of 2007
in
E.P.No.48 of 1997
in
C.S.No.43 of 1962

P-1 S.V.R. Saroja  ..

P-2 S.V.R. Vijaya  ..

P-3 S.V.R. Ramprasad  ..

P-4 S.V.R. Renuka Devi  All Are Residing At L17/71 24Th St Anna Ngar East Chennai 102				...   Petitioners

	Vs.

R-1 S.V. Mathaprasad  20 Bajanaikoil St Rajakilpakkam Chennai 600 073

R-2 Mrs. Rajaby Fathima Buhari  Dead By Lrs

R-3 A.M. Buhari (Dead)  By Lrs

R-4 Mohammed Basheer Buhari  (Dead) By Lrs

R-5 Mrs Zubeida Hamid  .

R-6 Mr Mohammed Farook  ..

R-7 Mrs. Maimeena Jamal  ..

R-8 Haja Mohideen Buhari  ..

R-9 Abdul Coder Buhari  ..

R-10 Mrs Mumtaj B Uhari  2 To 9 Are Legal Heirs Of 1St J.D.) Residing At Imperial Hotel No.5 Gandhi Irvin Road Egmore Chennai 8

R-11 Mrs Shahira Basheer  W/O Deceased Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-12 Mrs Fazeelath Siraj  D/O Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-13 Mrs. Mahajubdeen Ibrahim  D/O Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-14 Haja Abdul Nazeer  D/O Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-15 Mrs Farzana Malik  D/O Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-16 Haja Anwar Murad  S/O Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-17 Mrs Zeenath Yusuf  S/O Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-18 Haja Amed Imitaz  S/O Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-19 Haja Mohammed Sameer  S/O Mohammed Basheer Buhri

R-20 Miss Roshanara Begam  10 To 19 Are Legal Heirs Of 3Rd J.D.) Residing At No.L 15 27Th Cross St Besant Nagar Chennai 90

R-21 A.M.D. Buhari  						..Respondent


Order
1


Order Sheet                                                                  Sheet No...
                                  A.P. No. 251 of 2005

                         In The High Court At Calcutta
                    Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction                           Original
                              Side


                                                   In the matter of:


                                      Union Of India
                                          Vs.
                                  Samarendra Nath Mukherjee
Before:
The Hon'ble Justice
Indira Banerjee.

Date: 09.04.2009
                                  Mr. N.R. Mukherjee .....for the Petitioner

                                  Mr. Moloy Kr. Ghosh.....for the Respondent


                                       Judgment
In The Court Of Sh. Devendra Kumar Sharma
  Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Spl. Acts) Central
                           Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
                    Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. vs D.D. Sehgal (through Lr)
                                                   U/s 630 of Companies Act, 1956
                                                                            Cc No.1650/3
Judgment
In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi

                 Arb. A. No. 5 of 2012 & I.A. No. 22361 of 2012

                                              Reserved on: 11th January, 2013
                                              Decision on: 4th February, 2013

        Intertoll Ics Cecons. O & M Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..... Appellant
                      Through: Mr. Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Senior
                                Advocate      with     Mr.     Balaji
                                Subramanian, Ms. Jasleen Oberoi and
                                Ms. Rohini Sisodia, Advocates.

                             versus

        National Highways Authority Of India .... Respondent
                     Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate
                              with Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr.
                              Samanvya Dwivedi, Mr. Kunal Bahari
                              and Ms. Monisha Handa, Advocates.

                                        And
                 Arb. A. No. 6 of 2012 & I.A. No. 22363 of 2012

        Intertoll Ics Cecons. O & M Co. Pvt. Ltd. ..... Appellant
                      Through: Through: Mr.Ciccu Mukhopadhaya,
                                Senior Advocate with Mr. Balaji
                                Subramanian, Ms. Jasleen Oberoi and
                                Ms. Rohini Sisodia, Advocates.
                      versus

        National Highways Authority Of India .... Respondent
                     Through: Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,
                              Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhimanyu
                              Bhandari, Mr. Samanvya Dwivedi, Mr.
                              Kunal Bahari and Ms. Monisha Handa,
                              Advocates.

        Coram: Justice S. Muralidhar


Arb. A. Nos. 5 & 6 of 2012                                         Page 1 of 23
                              Judgment
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

WP(C).No. 16206 of 2010(R)


1. Jayachandran.C., Aged 38,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. The High Court Of Kerala, Represented By
                       ...       Respondent

2. The Registrar (Subordinate Judiciary),

3. State Of Kerala, Represented By The

4. Krishnakumar.P., S/O.G.P.Panicker,

5. Smitha.M., Uphar, Udaya Nagar,

6. Muhammed Raees, S/O.Muhammed Basheer,

7. Sulekha.M., Panamvilakam Veedu,

8. Balakrishnan K.K., Kariyangatte House,

9. Nazeera.S., 8/61, Nelsa,

10. Babu.K., Charuvila Puthen Veedu,

11. Kauser Edapagath, Zahira,

12. Badharudeen.A., Panayil Veedu,

13. Manilal C.S., Chennattu House,

                For Petitioner  :Sri.Mathai M Paikaday(Sr.)

                For Respondent  :Sri.A.Mohamed Mustaque

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice Mr.J.Chelameswar
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon

 Dated :13/09/2010

 O R D E R
    J.Chelameswar, Cj. & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J.
            - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
            W.P.(C)Nos. 16206 and 16207 of 2010
            - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
          Dated this the 13th day of September, 2010

                              Judgment
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Jabalpur
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Present:                   Hon'ble Shri Justice R.C. Mishra
                                        Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Jain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                                    Misc. Cr. Case No.1983/2011
             Rahis Ahmed, son of Aziz Ahmed,
             aged about 50 years, Resident of 1002,
             Panchtantra Towers, Yari Road, Andheri (West)
             Mumbai - 400 061 (Mah)                                                                                     ...Petitioner
                                        vs.
             State of Madhya Pradesh, through Sho
             P.S. State Economic Offence, Investigation Bureau
             Bhopal (M.P.)                                  ...Respondent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Shri Kishore Shrivastava, Senior Counsel with Shri S.A. Khan,
Advocate for the petitioner.
     Shri Umesh Pandey, Standing Counsel for the respondent/State
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Hearing : 11.04.2011
Date of Order                         : 22.07.2011

                                                              Order
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras  

Dated: 30.06.2008

Coram:  

The Honourable Mr.Justice P.D.Dinakaran 
And
The Honourable Mr.Justice K.N.Basha

Criminal Appeal No.1110 of 2006


Chinnappan alias Karuppusamy			...  Appellant


vs.


State, by Inspector of Police, 
Dharapuram Police Station, 
Erode District. 
(Cr.No.216/2006).					...  Respondent

	Appeal against the judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Erode District dated 24.11.2006 made in S.C.No.132 of 2006.

		For Appellant	:	Mr.S.Ashok Kumar, S.C.
						For Mr.A.K.Kumaraswamy

		For Respondent :	Mr.N.R.Elango
						Additional Public Prosecutor
----

J U D G M E N T
-1-


     In the Court of Dig Vinay Singh : Addl. Sessions Judge
           Spl. Judge: Ndps (Nw): Rohini Courts: Delhi

     In the matter of :
                                                 Sc No.         64/12
                                                 Fir No.        210/12
                                                 Ps.            Crime Branch
                                                 U/s            21 Ndps Act
     State
             Versus
     Mohd. Niyaz
     S/o Late Sh.Kurban Ali
     R/o H.No. E-2609, J.J.Colony,
     Bawana, Delhi

                                Date of receipt                 : 19.10.2012
                                Date of arguments               : 08.01.2014
                                Date of announcement            : 08.01.2014

     Judgment
In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi

                       Crl.L.P. No. 257 of 2013

Icon Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.                           ..... Petitioner
                  Through:              Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate

                               versus

Aggarwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors ..... Respondents
               Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda & Mr.
                          Anand Chaudhari, Advocates

                               With

                       Crl.L.P. 258 of 2013

Icon Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.                             ..... Petitioner
                  Through:              Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate

                               versus

Aggarwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors ..... Respondents
               Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda & Mr.
                          Anand Chaudhari, Advocates

                           With
                       Crl.L.P. 259 of 2013

Icon Buildcon Pvt.Ltd.                              ..... Petitioner
                  Through:              Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate

                               versus

Aggarwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors..... Respondents
               Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda & Mr.
                            Anand Chaudhari, Advocates
               With
           Crl.L.P. 260 of 2013
Crl.Lp. Nos. 257-262 of 2013                             Page 1 of 14
 Icon Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.                                 ..... Petitioner
                  Through:                  Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate

                               versus

Aggarwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors..... Respondents
               Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda & Mr.
                          Anand Chaudhari, Advocates

                           With
                       Crl.L.P. 261 of 2013

Icon Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.                                 ..... Petitioner
                  Through:                  Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate

                               versus

Aggarwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors..... Respondents
               Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda & Mr.
                            Anand Chaudhari, Advocates
               And
           Crl.L.P. 262 of 2013

Icon Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.                                 ..... Petitioner
                  Through:                  Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate

                               versus

Aggarwal Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors..... Respondents
               Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda & Mr.
                          Anand Chaudhari, Advocates

        Coram: Justice S. Muralidhar

                               Order
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

Crl Rev Pet No. 3953 of 2007()


1. Moosakoya, S/O.Muhammed,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. The State Of Kerala, Represented By
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :Sri.Babu S. Nair

                For Respondent  :Public Prosecutor

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B.Koshy
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema

 Dated :05/12/2007

 O R D E R
In The Court Of  Anurag  Sain, Adj­03 (East), 
            Karkardooma Courts, Delhi


 Rca No.: 90/14
 Unique Case Id No.  02402C0253912014 

Sh. Ashok Kumar Jaitly,
S/o Late Devraj Jaitly,
R/o 12/80, Second Floor,
Geeta Colony, 
Delhi­110031
                                                         ........Appellant

Smt. Manjeet Kaur,
W/o Late Sh. Surjeet Singh,
R/o F­78, Rajouri Garden,
New Delhi­110027.
                                                         ........Respondent

Date of institution of appeal       : 25.08.2014
Date of reserving judgment          : 27.08.2014
Date of pronouncement               : 29.08.2014

Judgment
In The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At Jaipur 

Bench, Jaipur

(1) S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 4379/2012
Dewan Syed Aley Rasool Ali Khan vs. Altaf Hussain & Ors.

With 
(2) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15228/2013
Abdul Kalam & Anr. vs. District & Sessions Judge, Ajmer & Ors.
With 
(3) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15275/2013
Syed Gulzar Hussain & Anr. 
vs. 
District & Session Judge, Ajmer & Ors.

Date ::13.11.2013

Common Judgment
Tapadia Rr/B.                            1 / 60                        Cra/395/2015

          In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
                  Civil Appellate Jurisdiction




                                                                                         
           Civil Revision Application No. 395 Of 2015




                                                                 
    1. Magnum Developers and Ors.                                               Applicants

                                                 Vs

    1. Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust




                                                                
    and Anr.                                                            .. Respondents


    Mr. Y. H. Muchhala, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Girish Godbole,




                                                      
    Senior Advocate a/w S/Shri Vaibhav Nagvekar, Ajay Panicker and
    Rashda Ainapore, i/b. Ajay Law Associates for Applicants.
                                  
    Mr. Sagheer A. Khan a/w Mr.Sharique Nachan and G.D.Shaikh i/b
    Judicare Law Associates, Advocates for respondent no.1.
                                 
                           Coram :                          R.G.Ketkar,J.
                           Reserved On:                     14/08/2015
                           Pronounced On :                   11/09/2015
           
        



    Order
*       In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
%                           Rcr No. 120/2011
+                                    Date of Decision: 11th July, 2011

#      Vijay Nayyar                                      ...Petitioner
!                                 Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocate

                                 Versus

$     Om Prakash Malik                       ....Respondent
                 Through: Mr. N.N Aggarwal & Mr. Rohit
                           Gandhi, Advocates

       Coram:
*      Hon'Ble Mr. Justice P.K.Bhasin

1.     Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed
       to see the judgment?(No)
2.     To be referred to the Reporter or not? (No)
3.     Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? (No)


                              Order
The Honourable Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy  And The Honourable Sri Justice M.S.K. Jaiswal                    

Criminal Appeal Nos.172 of 2015 And Batch    

20-01-2017 

Shaik Akram  Appellant  

The National Investigation Agency Rep. by its Special Public Prosecutor High
Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and the State of
Andhra pradesh  Respondents   Counsel for the Appellants : Mr. A.T.M. Rangaramanujam Senior Counsel, for Mr. T. Prasanna Kumar & Mr. D. Purnachandra Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy, Special Public Prosecutor, National Investigation Agency <Gist :
>Head Note:    
?Citations : 1. (1979) 4 Scc 172  
 2. (2014) 6 Scc 59
 3. (2013) 13 Scc 1
 4. Air 1963 Sc 822
 5. (2014) 14 Scc 295
 6. Air 1952 Sc 16
 7. (1978) 1 Scc 405
 8. (2010) 6 Scc 614
 9. (2001) 9 Scc 642
 10. 1990 Crl Lj 215
 11. Air 1979 Sc 1705
 12. 2010 Law Suit (Bom.) 915
 13. (2013) 14 Scc 266 The Honble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy And The Honble Sri Justice M.S.K. Jaiswal Criminal Appeal NOs.172, 175 And 311 Of 2015 Dated:20-1-2017 The Court Made The Following:         
Common Judgment
Before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Bangalore
                     (Scch-8)
    Present: Shri P.J. Somashekar B.A., Ll.B.,
             Xii Additional Small Causes Judge
             and Member, M.A.C.T., Bangalore.

        Dated this the 27th day of August 2015

        M.V.C. Nos.8161/2011 & 1118/2012

Petitioner in Mvc Shri B.V.Pradeep,
8161/2011         Son of B.V.Venkatachalapathy,
                  Aged about 24 years,
                  Residing at No.5, 13th Cross,
                  Wilsongarden,
                  Bengaluru-560 027.
                  Also at No.32, Bagepalli Town,
                  "D" Division,
                  Chickballapur District.
                  (Shri P.Shivakumar, Advocate)

Petitioner in Mvc Shri A.M.Narendra Babu,
1118/2012         Son of A.M.Muninagappa,
                  Aged about 24 years,
                  Residing at No.252, Narasepura,
                  Vidyaranyapuram Main road,
                  Bengaluru-560 097.
                  Also at Attibele Village,
                  Hosakote Taluk,
                  Bengaluru Rural District.
                  (Shri M.E.Mohan Kumar,
                  Advocate)

                  V/s.
Respondents in    1. Venkata Choudary Pattipatti,both the cases Son of P.Venkatanaidu, Residing at No.3/61, 2 Scch-8 Mvc 8161/2011 & 1118/2012 Nadimipalli Village, Gugudu Post, Narapala-515 425, Andhrapradesh State. 

 Dead by his L.Rs. 

 1(a) Venkatanaidu, Son of Patti Patti, Residing at M.Gopal Naidu, Nallacherlapalli village, Mudigabba (Mandalam), Ananthapuram District, Andrapradesh 515 159. 

 (Exparte)

 2. The Manager, Chola-MS General Insurance Company Limited, Dare House, 2nd floor, No.2 N.S.C., Bose Road, Chennai-600 001. 

 (Shri Y.P.Venkatapathi, Advocate)

 3. Shri N.V.Rajan, Son of Varadarajulu, No.145, Green View Homes, Kamaraj Road, Bharathi Road, Bengaluru. 

 (Exparte)
 4. The Manager, The New India Assurance Co. 

 No.19/4, Saranchal Arcade, 1st Floor, Dinnuer Main road, R.T.Nagar, Bengaluru.        (Shri Srinivasa T.P., Advocate)
 3                  Scch-8           Mvc 8161/2011 & 1118/2012




                  Common Judgment
1

     High Court Of Madhya Pradesh At Jabalpur

      Single Bench : Before Justice J.K. Maheshwari

               Misc. Appeal No. 3927 Of 2010

                       Shivnarayan Mahant

                              -Versus-

                Registrar, Public Trust and others

_____________________________________________________

Shri Girish Shrivastava, Advocates, for the appellant.
Smt. Sheetal Dubey, Govt. Advocate for respondent no.1.
Shri Avinash Zargar, Advocate for the respondents No. 2 to 7.
___________________________________________________

                            Order
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras

Dated:29.10.2012

Coram:
							
The Honourable Mr. Justice M.Venugopal

C.M.A.No.1347 of 2011





M/s.United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Divisional Office,
Vellore.						... Appellant/2nd Respondent

Vs.

1.K.Dhanalakshmi
2.K.Karthikeyan
3.K.Saravanan
4.K.Sarathkumar
5.L.Srinivasan
6.Saroja						... Respondents 1 to 6/Claimants

7.G.Selvakumar
8.Uma Maheswaran					... Respondents 7 & 8/Respondents 1  & 3

(Respondents 7 & 8 exparte in Lower Court)




Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 04.09.2010 in M.C.O.P.No.237 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,  Subordinate Court, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.

		For Appellants			: Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan

		For Respondents 1 to 6		: Mr.G.Vinodhkumar

		For Respondents 7 & 8		: Exparte

Judgment
1        Civil Revision No.105/2015

             High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                         Bench At Gwalior

                      Civil Revision No.105/2015

Petitioner.......                            Vijay Sood

                                       Vs.

Respondents.....                     Kanak Devi and others

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri N.K.Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Shri Sanjay Sharma,
Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri V.K.Bhardwaj, Sr. Advocate with Shri Anoop Gupta,
Advocate for the respondent No.1.
Date of hearing                              : 01/02/2016
Date of order                                : 29/03/2016
Whether approved for reporting               : Yes
                             Order
In The Court Of Sh. Sanjay Sharma : Special Judge (Ndps) /
  Addl. Sessions Judge, (North­East): Karkardooma Courts, 
                            Delhi


Sc No.          :                                    17/10
Fir No.         :                                    77/10
Ps              :                                    Crime Branch
Under Section   :                                    20 (b) (ii) (C) of the Ndps Act
Case Id         :                                    02402R0215232013

State                        Versus                          Sanjeev Kumar (in Jc)
                                                             S/o Sh. Bhola Shah
                                                             R/o Sikta Bazar, Ps Sikta 
                                                             District Betia, Bihar

Date of Institution                                  : 31.07.2010
Date of reserving order                              : 28.07.2014
Date of Judgment                                     : 06.09.2014

                                                 J U D G M E N T
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court


Dated : 02/08/2006


Coram:
The Honoruable Mr.Justice F.M.Ibrahim Kalifulla
and
The Honourable Mr.Justice P.Murgesen


W.A.(MD)No.135 of 2006
W.A.(MD)No.136 of 2006


R.Shanmugaiah				... Appellant in
					    both the W.As.

vs.


1.P.S.Lakshmanakumar

2.Regional Transport Authority,
  Virudhunagar District,
  Virudhunagar.

3.The State Transport Appellate
   Tribunal,  High Court Campus,
   Chennai-600 104.			... Respondents in
					     both the W.As.


W.A.No.135/2006: Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
of the learned single Judge, dated 29.03.200, made in W.P.No.10481/2005.

W.A.No.136/2006: Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
of the learned single Judge, dated 29.03.200, made in W.P.No.10482/2005.


!For Appellant   ...  Mr.M.Palani

^For Respondent  ...  Mr.M.Ajmalkhan
No.1
		
For Respondent	 ...   Mr.R.Janakiramulu,
No.2			Spl.Govt.Pleader.



:Judgment
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh At Jabalpur


                       First Appeal No : 175 Of 2011

                          Smt. Madina Begam & Anr.
                                        - V/s -
                       Shiv Murti Prasad Pandey & Ors.


Present :             Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon.

                       Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vimla Jain
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate with Shri Sushil

       Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellants.

              Shri J.L.Soni, Advocate for Respondent No.1 & 2.

              Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Government Advocate

       for Respondent No.3.

              Shri Ravish Agrawal, learned Sr. Advocate , Shri L.S.

       Singh, Sr. Advocate with Shri Kaustub Jha & Shri Lav

       Kush Mishra, Advocates for Respondent Nos.4 & 5.



                                        Order