AjayMukundS/Indian_Legal_NER_Dataset huggingface dataset:
In The Court Of Shri Ravinder Singh­Ii
                       Metropolitan Magistrate
                       Dwarka Courts, New Delhi


Case No. :  4522/14
Unique Case Id No. : R0765252009


M/s G E Capital Transportation
Financial Services Ltd.
Aifacs Building,
1 Rafi Marg,
New Delhi­110001                      ..........................................Complainant


                                                Versus


Sh. Ismile Khan (Proprietor)
M/s Sojat Traders
Village Dhakri
Teh. Sojat, District­ Pali,
Pali­306104                                    ........................................Accused


Date of Institution:                                                           16.04.2009
Plea of the accused:                                                      Pleaded Not Guilty
Date of Reserving Judgment:                                                    20.10.2014
Sentence or final Order:                                                       Acquitted
Date of Judgment:                                                              12.11.2014



                                            Judgment
Reportable
                        In The Supreme Court Of India
                        Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
                     Civil Appeal Nos. 2525-2516 Of 2013
               (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.5752-53 of 2008




  Rajesh Kumar & Ors. etc.                                      …Appellants
  Versus
  State of Bihar & Ors. etc.                                    …Respondents
                                    With
                        Civil Appeal No. 2517 Of 2013
                  (Arising out of Slp (C) No.6456 of 2008)


  Abhishek Kumar & Ors.                                 …Appellants
  Versus
  State of Bihar & Ors.                                 …Respondents


                               J U D G M E N T
Rca No.114/2014: "Vijay Kr. Sharma & Ors. V/s Jagdishwar Dayal Gupta & Ors."      Dod:  16.09.2014


             In The Court Of Vinod Yadav: Addl. District Judge­I:
              South­West District: Dwarka Courts: New Delhi
                           Regular Civil Appeal No.114/2014
In the matter of:
1.     Shri Vijay Kumar Sharma, 
       S/o Shri Umrai Singh Sharma,
       R/o E­55, Gali No.16, Sadh Nagar,
       Palam Colony, New Delhi.
2.     Shri Sultan Singh Negi,
       S/o Shri Kirth Singh Negi,
       R/o E­54, Gali No.16, Sadh Nagar,
       Palam Colony, New Delhi.
                                                                        .....Appellants
                                                (Through Shri P.K Bhardwaj, Advocate)

                                                               Versus

1.        Shri Jagdishwar Dayal Gupta,
          S/o Late Shri Ishwar Dayal,
          R/o 68, New Rajdhani Enclave,
          Vikas Marg, New Delhi­92.

2.        Municipal Corporation of Delhi,
          Town Hall, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi­06.
          (Through its Commissioner)
3.        The Executive Engineer (Works),
          Mcd, Najafgarh Zone, Delhi Gate,
          Najafgarh, New Delhi­45.
4.        Delhi Development Authority,
          Vikas Sadan, Ina Market, New Delhi.
          (Through its Vice­Chairman)
                                                                                                 .....Respondents
                                                                         (R­1 Through Shri R.K Gupta, Advocate)
                                                                                              (R­2 & R­3 Nemo)
                                                                      (R­4 Through Shri Arvind Gupta, Advocate)

Date of Institution of Appeal                         :           22.05.2010
Date of transfer to this court                        :           31.01.2014
Date of reserving judgment                            :           03.09.2014
Date of pronouncement                                 :           16.09.2014


Rca U/s 96 Cpc:  "Rca Dismissed"                                                                                     Page  1  of   22
 Rca No.114/2014: "Vijay Kr. Sharma & Ors. V/s Jagdishwar Dayal Gupta & Ors."      Dod:  16.09.2014


     Appeal U/s 96 Cpc Against The Order Dated 12.04.2010 Passed In Civil Suit 
         No.22/09/05 By Shri Vikas Dhull, Ld.ASCJ (S/W), Dwarka, New Delhi


16.09.2014

J U D G M E N T
The Honble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao              

Writ Petition No.2241 of 2015   

06-03-2015 

Smt.I.G.Ramana Kumari.....Petitioner

Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited. Rep. by its Chairman-cum- 
Managing Director and another.. Respondents  

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Vedula Srinivas

$Counsel for Respondents: Sri P.Anand Seshu  
                          Sri Krishna Rachakatla

<Gist :

>Head Note: 

? Cases referred:

The Honble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao              

Writ Petition No. 2241 Of 2015    

Order
Honble Sri Justice Suresh Kumar Kait And Honble Sri Justice U.Durga Prasad Rao                     

Crl.A.No.1586 of 2010

30-06-2017 

Karanam Nagaraju @ Snathakumar...Appellant    

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Public Prosecutor...Respondent. For Appellant :Sri M.K.Raj Kumar, Advocate. 

For Respondent: Public Prosecutor. 
<Gist:
>Head Note: 
? Citations:  
1.Air 1997 Sc 2960 2.2010 (173) Dlt 741 
3.(2012) 191 Dlt 225 (Fb) Honble Sri Justice Suresh Kumar Kait And Honble Sri Justice U.Durga Prasad Rao Criminal Appeal No.1586 of 2010 Judgment
1




                                                      ®
 In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bangalore

     Dated This The 03Rd Day Of September 2014

                            Before

     The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy

      Writ Petition No.8815 of 2014 (Gm-Cpc)
Between:

Sri. Hanumappa,
Son of Erabhovi,
now 53 years,
Resident of Suragondanahalli Village,
Imangala Hobli,
Hiriyur Taluk,
Chitradurga District - 577 501.

                                        ...Petitioner
(By Shri. Madhukar Nadig, Advocate)

And:

1.     Yallakka,
       Wife of Hanumappa,
       Now 48 years,
2.     Manjula,
       Daughter of Hanumppa,
       Now 24 years,
3.     Laxmi,
       Daughter of Hanumappa,
                               2



     Now 22 years,

     (The respondent 1 to 3 are
     Resident of Adivala Bhovi Colony,
     Hiriyur Taluk,
     Chitradurga District - 577 501.

4.   Sri. Chandrappa,
     Son of Era Bhovi,
     Now 38 years,

5.   Smt. Thippamma,
     Wife of Pujari Hanumaiah,
     Now 48 years,

6.   Smt. Laxmidevi,
     Daughter of Era Bhovi,
     Now 43 years,

7.   Smt. Kanumakka,
     Wife of Thimmaiah,
     Now 53 years,

     (the Respondent Nos. 4 to 7
     Resident of Suragondanahalli Village,
     Imangala Hobli,
     Hiriyur Taluk)
     Chitradurga District - 577 501.

8.   Sri. Puttagangaiahnavar,
     Son of not known,
     Aged not know,
     Resident of Tavandi Village,
     Imangala Hobli,
     Hiriyur Taluk),
                                  3



      Chitradurga District - 577 501.
                                        ...Respondents

(By Shri. K.N. Nitish, Advocate for Shri. K.V.Narasimhan,
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
Notice to respondent nos. 4 to 8 dispensed with)
                              *****
      This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India praying to set aside the impugned order
dated 13.1.2014 passed in R.A.No.11/2010 by the Senior Civil
Judge at Hiriyur on I.A.No.2 filed by the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
under Order 26 Rule 10-A read with Section 112 of Evidence Act,
vide Annexure-H.

      This Writ Petition having been heard and reserved on
22.8.2014 and coming on for pronouncement of Orders this day,
the Court delivered the following:-

                             Order
*      In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi

+                     Rcr 31/2009 & Cm 6929/2009


Tagore Education
Society Regd.                               ..... Petitioner
                              Through:      Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog,
                                            Senior Advocate with
                                            Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate

                      versus

Kamla Tandon & Anr.                         ..... Respondents
                 Through:                   Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior
                                            Advocate with Mr. Rajender
                                            Aggarwal, Advocate


                                    Reserved on:        May 13, 2009

%                                   Date of Decision: July 10, 2009


Coram:
Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manmohan


1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?                               Yes
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?               Yes



                               Judgment
..(1)..




            In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
                 Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction




                                                                     
               Criminal Application No.2015 Of 2008

     Rafael Palafox Garcia.                 ..Applicant.




                                             
            Versus
     The Union of India,
     and Anr.                               ..Respondents.

                   ....




                                            
     Mr.Anil Anney, Sr.Counsel a/w. Pravin                    Singhal,
     Adv.   i/b.  Rajeev Sawant & Associates                  for the
     applicant.

     Smt.Revati M. Dere, Counsel a/w. Mandar Goswami,




                                  
     Counsel for respondent No.1-U.O.I.

     Mr.S.S.Pednekar, App, for the State.
                    
                    ....

                         Coram :    Smt.V.K.Tahilramani,J.
 Date Of Reserving The Order
In The Court Of Ms.  Meenu Kaushik, Metropolitan Magistrate, Rohini: 
                                Delhi

Unique Id No. 02404R0094482011
Cc No. 14468/1/11

Subhash Basoya
S/o Sh. Suraj Singh
R/o 2736, Main Road,
Hansapuri, Tri Nagar,
Delhi­110035                                                       ............Complainant

V/s

Rahul Bhatia
S/o Sh. Ravinder Nath Bhatia
R/o E­22, IInd Floor,
Sector­1, Rohini,
Delhi­110085.                                                                 ................Accused 

                                          Judgment
Rc No. 11/88  Ps  : Cbi/Siu­Ix/Nd U/s 120B/420 Ipc and U/s 5 of Import and Exports (Control) Act, 1947. 
                                                                             Dod:  11.07.2014


 In The Court Of Pooran Chand: Chief Metropolitan
   Magistrate: Central District: Tis Hazari Courts:
                       Delhi

Rc No.: 11/88
Ps: Cbi/Siu-Ix/Nd
U/s 120B/420 Ipc and U/s 5 of Import and Exports (Control)
Act, 1947.
Cbi Vs. M/s Bothra Rugs P Ltd.
Unique Id No.: 02401R0872892005

J U D G M E N T
In The Court Of Ms Bhawani Sharma: Acj/Ccj/Arc 
     Shahdara: Karkardooma Courts: Delhi

E - 40/2014 
Unique Identification No. 02402C0136602014

Smt. Poonam Chadha
W/o late Sh. Anil Chadha,
R/o 3/61, (Old No.3/21),
Ram Gali, Vishwas Nagar,
Shahdara, Delhi­110032.                                              .....Petitioner

                                                 Versus 
Sh. Suresh Chand Jain
S/o late Sh. S.C. Jain,
R/o B­157, Surajmal Vihar, 
Delhi­110092.                                                        .....Respondent

 Application for Eviction of tenant under Section 14­D, 14 (1) (e) of 
                 the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

Petition filed on                          :  08.05.2014
Order reserved on                          :  15.11.2014
Date of Order                              :  20.11.2014
Decision                                   :  Leave to defend application of the 
                                              respondent - dismissed and 
                                              eviction order passed. 


                                     Order
The Hon'Ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar         
W.P. No.7764 Of 2006   

Dated 19-02-2013   

K.B.Jagan Mohan, son of K.Sunder Rao,A.P.State Agro Industries Development   
Corporation Ltd.,Eluru, WGDt and others....Petitioners

The State of A.P. rep.by its Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation Dept.,
Secretariat,Hydbad and another..Respondents  Counsel for Petitioner:Sri K.R.Prabhakar and Sri T.P.Acharya Counsel for Respondents : Sri MaHERCHAND Nori; G.P.for Co-operation and G.P.for Agriculture. 

<Gist:
>Head Note: 
?Cases Referred: 
1)2006 (2) Ald 210 
2)2007 (6) Supreme 97 = Air 2007 Sc 3100 1 2006 (2) Ald 210 2 2007 (6) Supreme 97 = Air 2007 Sc 3100 wp.7764,7765,19505,and 20387 of 2006 Common Order
In The Court Of Sh. Harvinder Singh,
                  Metropolitan Magistrate - 03 (West),
                    Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi - 110 054.

                                                                 Fir No.982/2004
                                                                 Ps - Nangloi
                                                                 State Vs. Anil etc.
Unique Case Id No.02401R1300162005

                                J U D G M E N T
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

                                              Present:

                 The Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon

                Monday, The 9Th Day Of February 2015/20Th Magha, 1936

                                   WP(C).No. 3435 of 2015 (D)
                                   --------------------------------------




Petitioner(S):
----------------------

            Asharaf, S/O.Abbas, Aged 31 Years
            Kunnupara House, Thettil P.O,
            Kasargode District.

            By Adv. Sri.S.Shajahan (Adoor)

Respondent(S):
-------------------------

        1. Station House Officer
            Kasargode Police Station,
            Kasargode District 671 121.

        2. Sub Divisional Magistrate
            Kasargode - 671 121.

        3. District Collector
            Civil Station, Kasargode. 671 121.

            By Government Pleader Sri.Kc.Vincent


            This Writ Petition (Civil) Having Come Up For Admission
            On 09-02-2015, The Court On The Same Day Delivered The
            Following:


Pj

WP(C).No. 3435 of 2015 (D)
--------------------------------------

                                           Appendix

Petitioner(S)' Exhibits
-------------------------------------

Ext.P1 -             A Copy Of The Seizure Mahazar Prepared By The First
                     Respondent Dated 29-1-2015

Respondent(S)' Exhibits
---------------------------------------

                     Nil.

                                                        / True Copy /


                                                        P.S. To Judge

Pj



                                                               C.R.
                P.R. Ramachandra Menon, J.
               ---------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.3435 of 2015
               ---------------------------------------
            Dated this the 9th day of February, 2015

                            Judgment
* In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi

+ Writ Petition (Civil) 12602 of 2006


                                           Reserved on    : 18th August , 2008
                                      Date of Decision:   24th September,2008

 #    M/S Hongkong And Shanghai
      Banking Corporation Ltd.               ..... Petitioner
                       Through : Mr.Kailash Vasdev, Sr.Advocate
                       with Mr.Siddharth Dias, Advocate.

                  versus

 $     Govt. Of India & Anr.                  ... Respondents
       ^                  Through : Mr.Sewa Ram and
                          Mr.R.K.Bachchan, Advocate for Union of
                          India.

                               Ms.Manju Saxena in person.


  % Coram:
    Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul


1.    Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
      judgment?                                                   Yes.
2.    To be referred to the Reporter or not?                      Yes.
3.    Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?      Yes.


                           Judgment
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras

Dated     12.02.2010

Coram

The Honourable Mrs. Justice R.Banumathi
And
The Honourable Mr. Justice M.M.Sundresh

C.M.A. No.3352 Of 2004

S.Valli							..	Appellant

versus

N.Rajendran						..	Respondent
	

	Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, against the judgment in O.P.No.326 of 2001 dated 23.07.2004 on the file of the I Additional Family Court, Madras and granting divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and set aside the judgment.

	For Appellant	          : M/s.D.Nagasaila for
					  M/s.S.Tamizharasi

	For Respondent		: M/s.Sheila Jayaprakash

* * * * *

J U D G M E N T
In The Court Of Ms. Vineeta Goyal, Additional 
District Judge ­ 01, Patiala House Courts,  New Delhi 
                 District, New Delhi


Suit No. 328/13
Unique Id no. 02403C0126172013


Sh. K.P. Singh (Kiran Pal Singh)
S/o Late Sh. Manju Singh 
R/o 6073/2, Gf, Pocket D­6, Dda Flats,
Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110 070
                                                                    ......... Plaintiff
                                  Versus
Jay Kumar Singh @ Jay Kumar Kiran Singh 
S/o Sh. K.P. Singh (Kiran Pal Singh) 
C/o Sh. S.C. Yamawar (Father in Law)
H.No. 14, Perfect Housing Society 
Indraprastha Nagar, Pannse Layout
Near Mukhare College,
Bhamti Nagpur - 440 022
                                                                 ........ Defendant
                          Suit presented           On : 19.09.2013
                          Arguments Heard          On : 10.10.2014
                          Order Pronounced         On : 16.10.2014 


Appearance : Sh. Rakesh C. Agarwal, counsel for the plaintiff.
             Sh. J. Andrews, counsel for the defendant.

Order
1                              Ep 10/2014

                   High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                         Bench At Gwalior

                           Sb: Justice Sujoy Paul
                          Election Petition No.10/2014
                                Rasal Singh
                                    vs.
                     The Election Commission of India
                                 and others

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Anil Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri D.K.Katare, Advocate for the respondents No.1 to 4.
Shri S.K.Shrivastava, Advocate for the respondent No.5.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Order
The Honble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy And The Honble Ms. Justice J.Uma Devi                   

Crl.A. Nos.71 of 2011

26-07-2017 

Bejjipalli Reyyamma and another   ..... Appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2

State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by Public Prosecutor, Hyderabad.  .....RespondentCounsel for the appellant: Mr.G.Vijayasaradhi, for Mr.Y.Kanakalingeswara Rao Counsel for the respondent: Public Prosecutor (Ap) Counsel for the appellant: Public Prosecutor (Ap) Counsel for the respondent: Mr.A.Ravi Shankar <Gist :
>Head Note: 
? Cases referred:
1. (2016) 11 Scc 673 
2. (2015) 11 Scc 154 
3. Air 1999 Sc 3255  
4. (2015) 11 Scc 154 
5. (2010) 8 Scc 514 = (2010) 3 Scc (Cri) 942 
6. Air 1970 Sc 1566 =(1971) 1 Scr 599 = 1970 Cri Lj 1415   
7. (2012) 7 Scc 569 = (2012) 3 Scc (Cri) 430 The Honble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy And The Honble Ms Justice J.Uma Devi Criminal Appeal Nos.71 of 2011 and 13 of 2013 Date: 26.07.2017 The Court made the following:
Common Judgment
1

         In The Court Of Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Metropolitan 
         Magistrate­1 (East) Karkardooma Courts, Delhi 

                                                              Fir No. 289/2010
                                                              Ps : Gandhi Nagar 
                                                              Under section 420/34 Ipc
In the matter of:

State  
                                            Versus 

1. Neeraj Jain,
2. Prabash Jain 
    Both S/o Late Sh. Mittal Jain
    Both R/o H. No. X/2696, 
    Gali no. 6A, Raghubarpura No. 2, 
     Gandhi Nagar, Delhi. 
                                                          
Date of Institution  :           20.04.2011
Date of arguments :              21.11.2013
Date of judgment :               16.12.2013


                                            Judgment
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh  :
                  Jabalpur.

               Writ Petition No.10938/2014

                Rajesh Kumar Rathore & others.

                               Vs.
          Indian Oil Corporation Limited and others.


Present :

Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi. J.

      Shri R.N. Singh, learned Senior counsel assisted by Shri
      Abhishek Arjariya, learned counsel for the petitioner.

      Shri Aditya Adhikari, learned Senior counsel assisted by
      Shri Ritvik Parasar, learned counsel for the respondent
      No.1.

      Shri Vaibhav Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer, for the
      respondent No.2-State.

      Shri Jayant Neekhra, learned counsel for the
      respondent No.3.

      Shri Manikant Sharma, learned counsel for the
      respondent No.4.




                           Order
In The Court Of Sh. Arun Bhardwaj
 Presiding Officer: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal­Ii, 
              Dwarka Courts: New Delhi

                                   Mact No.  34/13

In The Matter Of : ­

   1. Smt. Meena Sarkar (Widow) (aged 23 yrs.)
      W/o late Sh. Uttam Sarkar
       
   2. Kumari Shweta Sarkar (Daughter) (aged 03 yrs.)
      D/o late Sh. Uttam Sarkar

      Both permanent R/o Basant Pur,
      Palus Bagh, P.O. Surchiya, 
      P.S. Bhatar, Distt. Vardhman (West Bengal)

      Presently at House of Sh. Ravi Kumar,
      Village Pochanpur, Sector­23,
      Dwarka, New Delhi.
                                                                             ... Claimants

                                 Versus

   1. Sh. Dushyant Singh  (Owner)
      S/o Sh. Rajbir Singh,
      R/o H.No. 1256/3, Gali No. 5,
      Rajiv Nagar, Gurgaon (Hr).
       
   2. Oriental Insurance Co. (Insurer)
      Do: Payal Cinema Complex,
      Sector­14, Delhi Road,
      Gurgaon (Hr).
      Ro: Oriental House, A­25/27, 
      Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi­2.
                                                                  ... Respondents




Mact No. 34/13     Smt. Meena Sarkar & Anr. v. Sh. Dushyant Singh & Anr.     Page No. 1 of 17
 Filed On                                  :       03.04.2013
Reserved On                               :       06.12.2013
Decided On                                :       03.01.2014

                               ­:  J U D G M E N T
In The Court Of The Li Addl. Cityf Civil &
  Sessions Judge At Bengaluru City. (Cch 52)

        Dated this the 21st day of October 2015

                       Present:
        Sri G.D.Mahavarkar, M.A., Ll.B (Spl),
        M.L. (Lab & Indstrl Rlns & Adm. Laws),
        Ll.M (Business) Laws), M.Phil-in-Law
                  (Juridical Science)
  Li Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City.

              Crl. Appeal No. 395/2013

Appellant            : B.M. Raju,
Original Complainant   S/o. Marisiddappa,
                       Aged about 46 years,
                       R/a. C/o. Lord Mary,
                       Nearby Church,
                       Holebeedi Road, Dodda Begur,
                       Bangalore - 570 068.

                         And also at:

                         Provisions Store,
                         Next to V.J.Bakery,
                         Last Bus Stop, Kudlu,
                         Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk,
                         Bangalore Urban District.

                         (By Sri K.V.Sathish & Associates,
                          Advocates)

                           Vs.
                                 2     Crl.Appeal No.395/2013


Respondent                 :   Smt. Ashwathamma,
Original accused               W/o. Muninarayanappa,
                               Aged about 48 years,
                               R/a. No.137, Ground Floor,
                               10th Main, Opp, Water Tank,
                               Aecs Layout, Kudlu,
                               Bangalore - 560 068.

                               (By Sri J.M. Ravikumar,
                                Advocate)

                          Judgment
In The Court Of Ms.Madhu Jain:Special Judge­01 (Pc Act):
                 Cbi, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.


Cc No.18/2011
Rc No.26A/2003/CBI, Acb, New Delhi
U/s.120(B) Ipc & U/s 7, 13(2) R/W Section 13(1)(D) of Pc Act, 1988


Case Id No.:02403R0662082004


In the matter of:


       Cbi
                                  Versus



1.     Hiren Tokas,
       S/o Shri Sukhbir Singh,
       R/o 236, Vill. Munirka, New Delhi­67.


2.     Subhash Chander Jain,
       S/o Late Shri Kedarnath Jain,
       R/o Rz­57, Kailash Puri,
       Palam Colony, New Delhi.                        ... Accused 



Date of Institution          :    11.08.2004
Date of Argument heard       :    22.05.2014
Date of Decision             :    22.05.2014




Cbi Vs. Hiren Tokas & Anr.
Cc No.18/2011                                        Page No. 1 / 87
 Judgment
Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court

Dated:28/07/2009

Coram
The Honourable Ms.JUSTICE R.Mala

S.A.No.87 of 2004

1.  V.Sadasivan Nair

2.  V.Ramachandran Nair

3.  Sakunthala

4.  Usha

5.  Jayan			     ..plaintiffs/Appellants

vs.

Raghavan Nair		             ..Defendant/Respondent

Prayer

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the civil Procedure Code
against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.101 of 1999, dated 04.06.2003, on
the file of the Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram confirming the judgment and
decree made in O.S.No.932 of 1994, dated 17.09.1999,on the file of the
Additional District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram.

!For Appellants  ...Mr.K.N.Thampi
^For Respondent  ...Mr.V.M.Balamohan Thampi
		
:Judgment
Cc No. 33/1: U/s 195 Ipc r/w section 340 Cr.PC  : Ps Subzi Mandi                                     Dod: 27.11.2014


       In The Court Of Sh. Pooran Chand: Chief Metropolitan
       Magistrate: Central District: Tis Hazari Courts: Delhi

Cc No.:33/1
Ps: Subzi Mandi
U/s : 195 Ipc r/w section 340 Cr.P.C.
Unique Id No.: 02401R0263722011

J U D G M E N T
In The High Court Of Keralaat Ernakulam

                                                 Present:

                       The Honourable Mr.Justice K.M.Joseph
                                                      &
                    The Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad

         Thursday,The 2Nd Day Of January 2014/12Th Pousha, 1935

                          WA.No. 1321 of 2013 () In Wp(C).4435/2011
                         -------------------------------------------------------------
Against The Judgment In Wp(C) 4435/2011 of High Court Of Kerala Dated 16-07-2013




   Appellant/3Rd Respondent In The Wpc :
   -----------------------------------------------------------------

     Pramod Kumar
     Srivilas, West Veliyathunad
    Alangad P.O.,Pin - 683 511.

     By Adv. Sri.K.V.Gopinathan Nair

   Respondents/Petitioner And Respondents 1,2 & 4 In Wp(C):
   -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  1. The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation,
     Represented By Its Managing Director,
     Transport Bhavan, Fort P.O.,
     Thiruvananthapuram- 23.

  2. The Regional Transport Authority,
     Ernakulam Represented By Its
     Secretary,Pin - 682 030.

  3. The Secretary, Regional Transportauthority,
     Ernakulam, Pin - 682 030.

 4. The Statetransportappellatetribunal, Ernakulam,
     Pin - 682 016.

     R1 Byadv.Sri. P.C.Chacko
     R1 Byadv.Sri.Babu Joseph Kuruvathazha,Sc,Ksrtc
     R2 To 4 By Government Pleader Sri. C.R. Syamkumar
    Advocate Commissioner By Adv. Jeevan Mathew Manayani

     This Writ Appeal Having Come Up For Admission On 02-01-2014,
     The Court On The Same Day Delivered The Following:

WA.No. 1321 of 2013




                                               Appendix




Petitioner'S Exhibits:
------------------------------------

Annexure A1 -                   Copy Of The Judgment Of The State Transportappellate
                                Tribunal In M.V.A.A. No.474/2009 Dated 19.12.2009.

Annexure A2 -                   Copy Of The Certificatealong With The Certificate
                                Issued By The Assistant Engineer, National Highway Sub
                                Division, Aluva, Dated 7.4.2010

Annexure A3 -                   Copy Of The Regular Permit Issued To The Appellant
                                Valid Up To 19.10.2017.


Respondents' Exhibits
-------------------------------------

          Nil


                                                                  // True Copy //




sou.



                                                        C.R.




            K. M. Joseph & A. Hariprasad, Jj.
       =.=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=.=
                 W. A. No. 1321 of 2013
       =.=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=.=
            Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2014


                         Judgment
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras

Dated: 19.6.2006

Coram

The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice P.D.Dinakaran
And
The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice P.P.S.Janarthana Raja

T.C.(A) Nos.76 to 86, 105, 129 
to 
133 of 2003 and 287 to 290, 
322 to 328 
and 
459 to 463 of 2006


T.C.No.76 of 2003

M/s.Bilahari Investments (P) Ltd.,
45, Poes Road, I Floor, 
Chennai-18.					..	Appellant

		Vs.


The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Ii, Chennai.				..	Respondent 

	T.C. Appeals filed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5.7.2002 made in I.T.A. Nos.2138(Mds)/93, 1793(Mds)/96, 810(Mds)/95, 2073(Mds)/95 and 1361 (Mds)/96.

	For Appellants in	:	Mr.V.D.Gopal
	all the cases
 	For Respondent		:	Mrs.Pushya Sitaraman
	in all the cases		Senior Standing Counsel

-----
Common Judgment
In The Court Of  Anurag  Sain, Adj­03 (East), 
             Karkardooma Courts, Delhi



 Rca No.: 80/14 
 Unique Case Id No.  02402C0188592014 

Rajiv Jain
S/o Sh. Rajender Kumar Jain
R/o Ix/25, Main Road,
Opp. Durga Mandir,
Kailash Nagar, Delhi­31.
                                                      ...........Appellant
                                      Versus

Sh. Rattan Lal
S/o Sh. Pooran Mal
R/o E­49, Ashok Vihar,
Phase : 1, Delhi
                                                      ........Respondent



Date of institution of appeal               : 01.07.2014
Date of reserving judgment                  : 04.12.2014
Date of pronouncement                       : 10.12.2014

Judgment
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

WA.No. 428 of 2008()


1. Muhammed Ashraf, Aged 38 Years,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. Smt. C.Arifa, Aged 31 Years,

                        Vs



1. Union Of India,
                       ...       Respondent

2. State Of Kerala,

3. The Chief Judicial Magistrate,

4. The State Bank Of Travancore,

5. The Tahsildar,

                For Petitioner  :Sri.Varghese C.Kuriakose

                For Respondent  :Sri.T.Krishnan Unni (Sr.)

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B.Koshy
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.N.Ravindran

 Dated :13/08/2008

 O R D E R
                    J.B.Koshy & P.N.Ravindran, Jj.
                   ---------------------------------------------------------
            W.A.No.428 of 2008, W.P.(C)Nos.13512 of 2007,
               7956, 13954, 14048, 14910, 15545, 16691,
              17647, 17672, 18441, 19315, 19440 of 2008
                                            and
                               Crl.R.P.1726 of 2008
                  ----------------------------------------------------------
                           Dated               August, 2008

                                     Judgment
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

CRL.A.No. 184 of 2003()


1. Subash, S/O. Gangadharan,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. State Of Kerala,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :Sri.P.Narayanan

                For Respondent  :Public Prosecutor

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B.Koshy
The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema

 Dated :25/02/2008

 O R D E R
                      J.B. Koshy & K. Hema, Jj.

                  --------------------------------------------

                     Crl.Appeal No. 184 of of 2003

                  --------------------------------------------

             Dated this the 25th day of February, 2008.

                                Judgment
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

RSA.No. 1008 of 2003()


1. Subaida Ashraf, W/O.Ashraf,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. District General Manager,
                       ...       Respondent

2. Union Of India, Rep. By Its

                For Petitioner  :Sri.Rajesh Nambiar

                For Respondent  :Sri.B.Krishna Mani, Sc, Bsnl

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Thomas P.Joseph

 Dated :13/11/2009

 O R D E R
                                                                  "C.R."

                         Thomas P.Joseph, J.
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                           R.S.A. No. 1008 of 2003
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
               Dated this the 13th     day of November,    2009

                               J U D G M E N T
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

Op No. 6273 of 1998(V)



1. T.M.Abdul Azeez
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. State Of Kerala
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :Sri.N.Dharmadan (Sr.)

                For Respondent  :Sri.K.P.Dandapani

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair

 Dated :10/04/2007

 O R D E R
                          T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.

                       -  - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                         O.P.Nos.6273 & 20334 of 1998

                       - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                    Dated this  the  10th day of April, 2007


                                     Judgment
Wp/8936/2012
                                          1

                    In The High Court Of Judicature Of Bombay
                               Bench At Aurangabad




                                                                           
                          Writ Petition No. 8936 Of 2012




                                                   
             Ramniwas Bansilal Lakhotiya, Died Thr. L.Rs. And Anr
                                      Versus
                       Sunil Pannalal Agrawal And Ors
                                         ...




                                                  
               Advocate for Petitioners : Shri V.J.Dixit, Sr. Advocate
                               i/b Shri L.V.Sangeet
                 Advocate for Respondents 1 to 3 : Shri A.S.Bajaj
                              Respondent 4 : Served.
                                         ...




                                     
                         Coram : Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.
 Dated: November 20th & 25th, 2014 ig ... 

 Oral Order
Cs No.213/2012:  "Chander Bhan Yadav V/s Dinesh Diwakar & Anr."                          Dod:  17.10.2014


       In The Court Of Vinod Yadav: Addl. District Judge­I:
         South­West District: Dwarka Courts: New Delhi

                                        Civil Suit No.213/2012

In the matter of:

Shri Chander Bhan Yadav,
S/o Late Shri Kanheya Lal Yadav,
R/o Wz­2A, Village Todapur,
Pusa, New Delhi­110 012.
                                                                                     .....Plaintiff
                                                              (Through Shri S.K Tomar, Advocate)

                                                    Versus

1.      Shri Dinesh Diwakar,
        S/o Shri Jogeshwar Bhagat,
        R/o Quarter No.F­1, Pusa,
        New Delhi­110 012.

2.      Shri Om Prakash,
        S/o Late Shri Kanheya Lal Yadav,
        R/o Wz­44, Village Todapur,
        Pusa, New Delhi­110 012.
                                                                                 .....Defendants
                                                        (D­1 Through Shri M.K Pathy, Advocate)
                                                                                (None for D­2)

Date of Institution of Suit                  :        15.03.2011

Date of transfer to this Court               :        08.08.2012

Date of reserving judgment                   :        09.10.2014

Date of pronouncement                        :        17.10.2014




Suit for recovery of Poss.,Cancellation,Decl. & Mandatory Injn.: "Suit Dismissed"             Page 1  of  22
 Cs No.213/2012:  "Chander Bhan Yadav V/s Dinesh Diwakar & Anr."                          Dod:  17.10.2014


                  Suit For Recovery Of Possession, Cancellation, 
                      Declaration And Mandatory Injunction


17.10.2014

J U D G M E N T
Reportable

             In The Supreme Court Of India

              Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

     Civil Appeal NOs. 9821-9822                 Of 2010
     (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 14985-14986 of 2010)


M/s J.P. Builders & Anr.                         .... Appellant(s)

          Versus

A. Ramadas Rao & Anr.                       .... Respondent(s)

                            With

     Civil Appeal NOs. 9824-9825               Of 2010
      (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 15008-15009 of 2010)

                               And

         Civil Appeal No. 9826                Of 2010
          (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No. 17435 of 2010)



                        Judgment
Hon'Ble Sri Justice G. Bhavani Prasad         

Criminal Petition Nos.7063 of 2008 and 2539 of 2009

29/02/2012 

A. Ashok Vardhan Reddy and others               

Smt. P. Savitha and another                     

Counsel For The Petitioners: Sri T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy          

Counsel For 1St Respondent: Sri P. Krishna Reddy         ^Counsel For 2Nd Respondent: --        
Crl.P. No.2539 of 2009:
A. Ashok Vardhan Reddy and others ... Petitioners State of A.P. represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another ...Respondents Counsel For The Petitioners: Sri Sharad Sanghi Counsel For 1St Respondent: --        
Counsel For 2Nd Respondent: Sri P. Krishna Reddy ? Citations: 
1.1992 (3) Alt 468
2. 2002 (1) Alt (Crl.) 300 (D.B.) (A.P.)
3. 2008 (Tls) 1227198 
4. 2008(2) Crimes 235 (M.P.)
5. 2006 (Tls) 43393 
6. 2009 (2) Ald (Crl.) 155 (Ap)
7. 2011 (2) Mlj (Cri) 429
8. Air 1991 Sc 1406 
9. 2010(2) Ald (Crl.) 689 (Ap)
10. 2007 Crl.L.J. 3361 = 2007(2) Ald (Crl.) 248
11. Air 2008 Sc 899 
12. Air 1990 Sc 1849  
13. 2009(1) Alt (Crl.) 285 (A.P.)
14. 2008(2) Ald (Crl.) 1 (Ap)
15. 2010 (1) Ald (Cri.) 1 (Ap)
16. (2002) 4 Scc 297 
17. Air 1957 Sc 540 (1) 
18. Air 1974 Sc 1032  
19. Air 1989 Sc 509 
20. 1997 (1) Ald 73
21. Air 1954 Madras 1039  
22. (1993) 3 Supreme Court Cases 406  
23. 2011 (2) Ald (Crl.) 191 (Ap)
24. 2010 (2) Ald (Crl.) 391 (Ap)
25. 2010 (4) Kerala Law Times 384 
26. Air 2008 Madras 162  
27. 2007 Crl.L.J. 4742
28. Air 1975 Sc 105 
29. 1998(1) Ald (Crl.) 122 (Ap)
30. Air 1963 Sc 1 
31. 2008(2) Alt 241 
32. 2001 (1) Alt (Crl.) 219 (Sc)
33. 2009 (3) Alt (Crl.) 242 (A.P.)
34. Air 2000 Sc 2324  
35. 2005 Air Scw 3569   
36. I (2007) Dmc 545 
37. 1998(5) Ald 426 Common Order
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

CRL.A.No. 1102 of 2005()


1. K.K.Vijayachandran, Assistant,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. P.P.Naushad, Proprietor,

                        Vs



1. The Superintendent Of Police,
                       ...       Respondent

2. State Of Kerala, Represented By

                For Petitioner  :Sri.P.Jacob Varghese

                For Respondent  :Sri.S.Sreekumar, Sc For Cbi

The Hon'ble Mrs. Justice K.Hema

 Dated :29/09/2006

 O R D E R
                               K.Hema, J.

                    ---------------------------------------

                       Crl.A.No.1102 of 2005

                    ---------------------------------------

            Dated this the 29th day of September, 2006

                               Judgment
Case No.:
Appeal (civil)  854 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  855 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  870 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  874 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  877 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  878 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  879 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  883 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  7353 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  7354 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  7355 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  7356 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  873 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  876 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  880 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  3552-60 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  4067 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  5380-81 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  875 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  881 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  8467-8499 of 2002
Special Leave Petition (civil)  19373-405 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  8511 of 2002
Special Leave Petition (civil)  12322 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  7314-35 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  3561-65 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  896 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  955 of 2002
Appeal (civil)  8500 of 2002
Special Leave Petition (civil)  7966 of 2002

Petitioner:
Bank of India & Ors.

Respondent:
O.P. Swarnakar etc.

Date Of Judgment
In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras  

Dated: 19.06.2008

Coram:  

The Honourable Mr.Justice P.D.Dinakaran 
And
The Honourable Mr.Justice K.N.Basha

Criminal Appeal No.429 of 2007


Velmurugan						...  Appellant

vs.

State, Rep. by Inspector 
of Police, Alangayam Police 
Station, Vellore District. 
(Cr.No.255/2005).					...  Respondent

	Appeal against the judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Vellore, Vellore District dated 8.3.2007 made in S.C.No.179 of 2006.

		For Appellant	:	Mr.S.Gowri Shankar

		For Respondent :	Mr.N.R.Elango
						Additional Public Prosecutor

J U D G M E N T
Wp No. 14557/2017
                                     1

 High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Jabalpur

                          W.P. No. 14557/2017

Rajesh Kumar Miglani                                     .....Petitioners
& Another
                                 Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh
& others                                               .....Respondents

==================================================
Coram:
      Db: Hon'ble Shri Justice Hemant Gupta, Chief Justice
             Hon'ble Shri Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.
==================================================
      Shri R.N. Tripathi, Advocate for the petitioners.
      Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, Additional Advocate General for the
respondents/State.
==================================================
Whether Approved for Reporting: Yes
==================================================
Law Laid Down:
      The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 being the Central Legislation does
not contemplate grant of fitness certificate and it is left to be framed by
the State Government, therefore, the issue of fitness certificate and
payment of tax falls within the legislative competence of the State in
terms of Section 65(2)(d) of the Act of 1988 and under Section 3 of the
M.P. Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991. Thus, Sub-Rule (2) of
Rule 48 of the M.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1994 contemplating
requirement of no dues certificate for grant of fitness certificate, cannot
be said to be beyond the legislative competence of the State
Government.
      There is a presumption that the official acts are performed
regularly in terms of Sub-section (e) of Section 114 of the Evidence
Act and so is the presumption of correctness of information available
on the website. Hence, the web portal of the Department should have
entire data of tax paid of each of the vehicle. Further, the aggrieved
person should be given an option of submitting online request to
reconcile such payment. The State Government to make such
amendment in the software.
Significant Paragraph Nos. 12, 13, 14, 16 and 17
==================================================
                                                                  Wp-14557-2017
                                       2


Reserved on: 20/09/2017
Delivered on: 03/10/2017
                              Order
1


       R
             In The High Court Of Karnataka
                 Circuit Bench At Dharwad


            Dated This The 18Th Day Of July 2012
                                Before
       The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anand Byrareddy


              Criminal Petition No.10343/2012


Between:


Prashant S/o Mahabelshwar Daivadnya,
Age : 32 Years, Occ : Business,
R/o.Anand Nagar, 2nd Cross,
Saphalya Building, Vadagoan,
Belgaum.                                       .Petitioner


(By Sri G.A.Holeyannavar, Advocate)
And:


1.     The State of Karnataka
       R/P State Public Prosecutor
       P.I Shahapur Police Station, Belgaum.
                                   2



2.    Usha W/o Prashant Daivadnya,
      Age : 26 Years, Occ : Household,
      R/o.Anand Nagar, 2nd Cross,
      Saphalya Building, Vadagoan, Belgaum.      . . .Respondent


(By Sri Vinayak.S.Kulkarni, Government Pleader for Respondent-1,
Respondent 2-Served)


       This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the proceedings in
S.C.No.452/2011 (i.e Annexure-A) on the file of the V-
Addl.Dist.&Sessions Judge, Belgaum, registered on the basis of Fir
under Shahapur Police Station, Belgaum, in Crime No.61/2011, for
the offences Punishable under section 498-1, 504, 307 of Ipc
      This petition coming on for Admission this day, the court
delivered the following:




                               Order
1                                       sa159.13.odt




                                                                                             
                                                                    
           In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay,

                               Nagpur Bench, Nagpur




                                                                   
                           Second Appeal No.159 of 2013




                                                   
    1.  Smt. Savita Bhagwantrao Patil,
         Aged about 40 years, 
         Occupation : Household work,

    2.  Shri Chaitanya Bhagwantrao Patil,
                             
         Aged about 18 years, Occupation :
         Student.
     
         Both R/o Saraswati Nagar, 
      

         Amravati, Tahsil and
         District Amravati.                                           .....       Appellants
   



                                                                                (Ori.Plaintiffs)

             ::  Versus ::





     1.  Shyam Pukhraj Asopa,
          Aged about 44 years,
          Occupation Business,
          R/o Bachharaj Plots, Chitra 
          Chowk, Amravati.





    2.  The Manager/Managing Director,
         Abhinandan Co-operative Bank Ltd.,
         Prabhat Chowk,  Amravati.                  .....       Respondents
                                                              Ori.Defendants)




                                                                    
                                           2                                 sa159.13.odt

              =================================
                   Shri S.S.Khedkar, Counsel for Appellants.




                                                                                   
                   None for Respondent No.1.
                   Shri J.B.Kasat, Counsel for Respondent No.2.
              ==================================




                                                           
                                   Coram          : A. P. Bhangale, J.
                                   Date           : April  24, 2014.




                                                          
         Judgment