AjayMukundS/Indian_Legal_NER_Dataset huggingface dataset:
In The Supreme Court Of India
                                       Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction

                                        Criminal Appeal No. 348 Of 2022
                                          (@ Slp (Crl.) No.8567 Of 2019)

              Anil Kumar Yadav                                                  …Appellant(S)
                                                        Versus

              State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr.                                 …Respondent(S)

                                                      O R D E R
1

                                                        R
       In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru

         Dated This The 19Th Day Of February, 2021

                           Before

            The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh

                Criminal Appeal No.176/2011

Between:

Sri G.L. Jagadish,
S/O Sri G.N. Lingappa,
Aged About 52 Years,
Residing At No.29, 3Rd Main,
Basaveshwara Housing Society Layout,
Vijayanagar, Near Bts Depot,
Bengaluru-40.                                   ... Appellant

             [By Sri H. Ramachandra, Advocate For
       Sri H.R. Anantha Krishna Murthy And Associates
                         - (Through V.C.)]

And:

Smt. Vasantha Kokila,
W/O Late N.R. Somashekhar,
Aged About 58 Years,
Residing At No.322, 8Th Main,
3Rd Stage, 4Th Block,
Basaveshwaranagar,
Bengaluru.                                    ... Respondent

         [By Sri K.R. Lakshminarayana Rao, Advocate]

      This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 378(4) Of
Cr.P.C. Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 06.07.2010
Passed By The P.O. Ftc-Ii, Bengaluru In Crl.A. No.470/2009
And Confirming The Order Dated 27.05.2009 Passed By The
Xxii Acmm And Xxiv Ascj, Bengaluru In C.C.No.17229/2004
Convicting The Respondent/Accused For The Offence
Punishable Under Section 138 Of Ni Act.
                                           2



     This Criminal Appeal Having Been Heard And
Reserved For Orders On 06.02.2021 This Day, The Court
Pronounced The Following:

                             Judgment
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

                               Present

       The Honourable Mr. Justice P.B.Suresh Kumar

 Monday, The 23Rd Day Of November 2020 / 2Nd Agrahayana,
                           1942

                         El.Pet..No.2 Of 2019


Petitioner:

              Anandagopan.K, Aged 72 Years,
              S/O.Late Kesava Panicker,
              Chaithanya,
              Vallamkulam P.O.,Eraviperoor,
              Pathanamthitta-689 542.

              By Advs.
              Sri.V.Philip Mathew
              Sri.E.Radhakrishnan
              Sri.Jeph Joseph

Respondent:

              Anto Antony, Aged 62 Years, S/O.Antony,
              Resident Of 12/710A(11/287),
              Skyline Palm Spring Villa,Kalathipady,
              Vadavathoor P.O.,
              Kottayam-686 010.

              R1   By   Adv. Sri.S.Sreekumar (Sr.)
              R1   By   Adv. Sri.P.Martin Jose
              R1   By   Adv. Sri.P.Prijith
              R1   By   Adv. Sri.Thomas P.Kuruvilla
              R1   By   Adv. Sri.R.Githesh
              R1   By   Adv. Sri.Manjunath Menon
              R1   By   Adv. Shri.Harikrishnan S.
              R1   By   Adv. Sri.Sachin Jacob Ambat
              R1   By   Adv. Smt.Hani P.Nair
              R1   By   Adv. Sri.Ajay Ben Jose
              R2   By   Sri.Murali Purushothaman, Sc,Ele.Commn.

     This Election Petition Having Been Finally Heard On
18-11-2020, The Court On 23-11-2020 Delivered The
Following:
 Election Petition No.2 of 2019
                                       ..2..

                          P.B.Suresh Kumar, J.
                  -----------------------------------------------
                     Election Petition No.2 of 2019
                  -----------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2020


                                 Judgment
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam

                                   Present

              The Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.S.Manikumar

                                      &

                 The Honourable Mr. Justice Shaji P.Chaly

      Tuesday, The 29Th Day Of September 2020 / 7Th Aswina, 1942

                          WP(C).No.34097 Of 2015(R)

Petitioner:
                 M.P.Chothy, Aged 65 Years
                 S/O. Kalamban Painkan, Macherikkudy House,
                 Iringole Kara, Perumbavoor Village,
                 Iringole P.O, Pin 683548.

                 By Adv. M.P.Chothy (Party-In-Person)

Respondents:
      1      State Of Kerala,
             Represented By The Chief Secretary,
             Govt. Secretariat,
             Thiruvananthapuram-695 001.

       2         The Registrar,
                 State Sc/St Commission, Ayyankali Bhavan,
                 Kanaka Nagar, Vellayambalam, Kaudiar P.O,
                 Thiruvananthapuram-695 003.

       3         Registrar General,
                 High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam

       4         Union Of India,
                 Represented By Its Secretary,
                 Ministry Of Social Justice And Empowerment,
                 Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi-110001.

                 R1 & R2 By Sri. Prakashan K.V., Special Govt. Pleader .
                 R3 By Adv. Sri.B.Unnikrishna Kaimal
                 R4 By Adv. Smt.Sindhumol.T.P., Cgc

     This Writ Petition (Civil) Having Been Finally Heard On 18-09-2020,
The Court On 29-09-2020 Delivered The Following:
 W.P(C) No.34097/2015                      2



                                                                           "C.R."
                                     Judgment
$~J-
*    In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
                        Judgment Reserved on: 23.01.2019
%                     Judgment Pronounced on: 28.02.2019

+      Cs(Os) 501/2016
       Sh Rajeev Tandon & Anr                    ..... Plaintiffs
                       Through Mr.Prabhjit Jauhar, Ms.Rosemary
                               Raju,     Ms.Aishwarya           and
                               Ms.Upasana Goel, Advs.
                       versus
       Smt Rashmi Tandon                         ..... Defendant
                       Through Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Mr.Vaibhav
                               Mishra and Ms.Rashmita Roy
                               Choudhury, Advs.

       Coram:
       Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath

Jayant Nath, J.


Ia No. 14323/2016
In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
                Delhi Bench: 'E' New Delhi

          Before Shri Kul Bharat, Judicial Member
                             And
             Shri O.P. Kant, Accountant Member
                  [Through Video Conferencing]

                       Ita No.5849/Del/2017
                      Assessment Year: 2014-15

Dcit,                             Vs.    Major Shiv Dayal Singh
Exemption Circle,                        Chikitsa Trust,
Ghaziabad                                Phoos Bangla, Civil Lines,
                                         Fatehgarh,
                                         Farrukhabad
                                                   Pan :Aabtm7636F
          (Appellant)                            (Respondent)

                Appellant by        Ms. Pramita M. Biswas, Cit(Dr)
                Respondent by       Sh. Abhinav Malhotra, Adv.


                           Date of hearing                     13.07.2021
                           Date of pronouncement               29.07.2021
                                 Order
Honble Sri Justice P. Keshava Rao        

Criminal Revision Case No.1625 Of 2018       


03-07-2018 

D. Chandra Sekhar ...Petitioner

The State of Telangana, by Traffic Police Station, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, rep., by Public Prosecutor, High ct of Judicatu

Counsel for Petitioner  : Sri G. Sravan Kumar.

Counsel for the respondent: Public Prosecutor


<Gist: 

>Head Note:    

? Cases referred

1.(2012) 8 Scc 450 



Honble Sri Justice P. Keshava Rao        

Criminal Revision Case No.1625 of 2018      

Order
$~
*     In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
+     Cs(Comm) 1155/2018 & I.As.13597/2018 And 14309/2018
      Su-Kam Power Systems Ltd.                ..... Plaintiff
                    Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior
                                Advocate with Mr. Anuj Berry,
                                Mr. Abhey J.V., Mr. Saksham
                                Dhingra, Mr. Vinay Tripathi
                                Mr. Malak Bhatt, Ms. Apoorva
                                Murali and Ms. Surabhi
                                Bhandari, Advocates.
                         versus
      Mr. Kunwer Sachdev & Anr.            ..... Defendants
                   Through: Mr.Rajeev Virmani,
                            Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ajay
                            Bhargava, Mr.Ankur Sangal,
                            Ms.Sucheta Roy, Ms.Richa
                            Bhargava,, Ms.Saugaat
                            Khurana and Ms.Niharika,
                            Advocates.
                         Reserved on:      11th October, 2019
%                        Date of Decision: 30th October, 2019
Coram:
Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Manmohan
                  Judgment
Fao-792-2018                                [1]



           In The High Court Of Punjab And Haryana
                        At Chandigarh

                                                Fao No.792 of 2018 (O&M)
                                            Date of Decision: August 06, 2018

Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited              ...Appellant

                 Versus

Mehrana and others                                          ...Respondents


Coram:- Hon'Ble Mr.Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu


Present:     Mr.Sanjeev Goyal, Advocate
             for the appellant-Insurer.

             Mr.Diwan S. Adlakha, Advocate
             for respondents No.1 to 5.


             ***
Harinder Singh Sidhu, J.
Reportable


                                         In The Supreme Court Of India
                                            Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

                                         Civil Appeal No.4233 Of 2018
                                   (Arising Out Of Slp (C) No.25649 Of 2017)


                         Canara Bank                                    …Appellant

                                                     Versus

                         N.G. Subbaraya Setty & Anr.               ...Respondents


                                                 Judgment
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad
 
 

A.F.R.
 
Court No. - 76
 

 
Case :- Application U/S 482 No. - 39535 of 2019
 

 
Applicant :- Mohammad Azam Khan And 2 Others
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Saiful Islam Siddiqui,Tahira Kazmi
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
C/Lpa/1655/2019                             Judgment Dated: 30/06/2021




             In The High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad

                R/Letters Patent Appeal No. 1655 of 2019

              In R/Special Civil Application No. 5342 of 2017
                                    With
                 Civil Application (For Stay) No. 1 of 2019
                In R/Letters Patent Appeal No. 1655 of 2019

For Approval And Signature:


Honourable Mr. Justice J.B.Pardiwala                                 Sd/-

and
Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati                          Sd/-

==========================================================

1     Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed                 No
      to see the judgment ?

2     To be referred to the Reporter or not ?                          No

3     Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy                No
      of the judgment ?

4     Whether this case involves a substantial question                No
      of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
      of India or any order made thereunder ?

==========================================================
        Navrangpura Gam Dharmada Trust Thru Trustees
                           Versus
                Gautambhai Bhikhabhai Thakor
==========================================================
Appearance:
Mr. Mehul Suresh Shah, Ld. Sr. Counsel With Mr Vishal C
Mehta(6152) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4
 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5
Mr. Ansin Desai, Ld. Sr. Counsel With Mr. Zalak B Pipalia(6161)
for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

    Coram:Honourable Mr. Justice J.B.Pardiwala
          and
          Honourable Ms. Justice Vaibhavi D. Nanavati

                             Date : 30/06/2021



                                 Page 1 of 34

                                                      Downloaded on : Sat Jan 15 09:36:25 Ist 2022
      C/Lpa/1655/2019                         Judgment Dated: 30/06/2021




                           Oral Judgment
Reportable


                                      In The Supreme Court Of India


                                     Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction

                                      Criminal Appeal No.576 Of 2010


                         Ram Lal                                          ….Appellant

                                                   Versus

                         State Of Himachal Pradesh                     ….Respondent

                                                       With

                                        Criminal Appeal No. 577 Of 2010

                                        Criminal Appeal No. 578 Of 2010




                                                  Judgment
1


                                                                         Non­Reportable

                                       In The Supreme Court Of India

                                      Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction

                                     Criminal Appeal No.1560 Of 2013

                         Farida Begum                                           .. Appellant

                                                         Versus

                         State of Uttarakhand                                   .. Respondent

 With Criminal Appeal No. 1652 of 2013 and Criminal Appeal No. 1653 of 2013 J U D G M E N T
Cr No.4242 of 2019(O&M)                                                              1

       In The High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At
                       Chandigarh
                                  Cr No.4242 of 2019(O&M)
                                  Date of Decision-19.11.2019


Municipal Committee/Council, Jalalabad(W)      ... Petitioner
          Versus
Vimla Devi (now deceased) through her Lr and others
                                                             ... Respondents


Coram:-Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Raj Mohan Singh

Present:     Mr. Puneet Kansal, Advocate and
             Ms. Nikhita Kansal, Advocate
             for the petitioners.
             Mr. Vikas Bahl, Senior Advocate with
             Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate and
             Ms. Priyanka Kansal, Advocate
             for respondents No.1 and 2.
                            ***
Raj Mohan Singh, J.
1
                                                                      S.A. No. 421/2001

       High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Bench At
                                     Indore
              (Single Bench : Hon. Mr. Justice Vivek Rusia)



                               S.A. No.421 of 2001


Sabbir Khan (Deceased) through.                           ...      Appellants.
L.Rs. - Habib Khan & others.                              Defendants no.2 to 4.


                                         Vs.


Sher Mohmmad & others.                                    ...Respondents


                   ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.
     Shri A.S. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Shri Sapnesh Jain, Advocate for appellants.
                  Shri Gulab Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
                   ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.



                                   Judgment
Item No.16                           Court No.7                 Section Ii

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                       Record Of Proceedings

     Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No(s). 16399/2019

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-12-2018
     in Crmwp No. 35460/2018 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
     Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)

     Rakesh Kumar                                                     Petitioner(s)

                                                 Versus

     The State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.                                Respondent(s)

     (For Admission and I.R. and Ia No.75301/2019-CONDONATION Of Delay
     In Filing and Ia No.75313/2019-EXEMPTION From Filing O.T. and Ia
     No.75311/2019-PERMISSION To File Additional
     Documents/Facts/Annexures )

     Date : 23-09-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     Coram :
                         Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit
                         Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose


     For Petitioner(s)             Mr.   Pradeep Kant, Sr. Adv.
                                   Mr.   Divyanshu Sahay, Adv.
                                   Mr.   Rohit Kumar Singh, Aor
                                   Ms.   Shradha Narayan, Adv.
                                   Mr.   Sanjay Goel, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)


                          Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R
Non­Reportable
                                 In The Supreme Court Of India
                                 Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

                                 Civil Appeal NO(s). 8109 Of 2010


         Goli Vijayalakshmi & Ors.                            ….Appellant(s)


                                 Versus


         Yendru Sathiraju(Dead) By Lrs. & Ors. ….Respondent(s)

                                               With

                                 Civil Appeal NO(s). 8110 Of 2010


                                          Judgment
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad
 
 

Afr
 
Reserved
 
Court No. - 39
 
Case :- Writ - C No. - 12759 of 2019
 
Petitioner :- Yantraleshwar Gupta Alias Dhreej Kumar And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U P And 10 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K. Upadhyay,Vineet Sankalp
 
With
 
Case :- Writ - C No. - 12768 of 2019
 
Petitioner :- Rajendra Maheshwari
 
Respondent :- State Of U P And 10 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K. Upadhyay,Vineet Sankalp
 
With
 
Case :- Writ - C No. - 12817 of 2019
 
Petitioner :- Sohrab Ahmad
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K. Upadhyay,Vineet Sankalp
 
With
 
Case :- Writ - C No. - 12821 of 2019
 
Petitioner :- Durga Prasad Baranwal And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K. Upadhyay,Vineet Sankalp
 

 
With
 
Case :- Writ - C No. - 12837 of 2019
 
Petitioner :- Ashish Agarwal And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K. Upadhyay,Vineet Sankalp
 
With
 
Case :- Writ - C No. - 12876 of 2019
 
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Chaurasia And 3 Others
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K. Upadhyay,Vineet Sankalp
 
With
 
Case :- Writ - C No. - 12877 of 2019
 
Petitioner :- Ishwar Chandra Giri And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U P And 10 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K. Upadhyay,Vineet Sankalp
 

 
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.


Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan
                 Bench At Jaipur
               (1) S.B. Civil Writs No. 1416/2018

1.   Sudhir Heeralal Dhadda Son Of Shri Heeralal Dhadda,
     Aged About 62 Years
2.   Sunil Heeralal Dhadda Son Of Shri Heeralal Dhadda, Aged
     About 61 Years, Both By Caste Oswal Jain, Resident Of
     House No. 730, Dhadda House, Gopal Ji Ka Rasta, Chaura
     Rasta, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
                                                  ----Petitioners
                             Versus
1.   The Assistant Commissioner-I, Devasthan Department,
     Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.   The Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Rajasthan,
     Udaipur.
3.   Shri Balraj Munot Son Of Shri Manak Raj Munot, Resident
     Of Raj Vihar Mall, 6/4, Tonk Road, Airport, Sanganer,
     Jaipur.
4.   Smt. Manju Surana Daughter Of Late Shri Manak Raj
     Munot, Resident Of D-182, Gajraj Marg, Bapu Nagar,
     Jaipur.
                                                ----Respondents

 (2) S.B. Civil Writs No. 3512/2018

1. Sudhir Heeralal Dhadda Son Of Shri Heeralal Dhadda, Aged About 62 Years
2. Sunil Heeralal Dhadda Son Of Shri Heeralal Dhadda, Aged About 61 Years, Both By Caste Oswal Jain, Resident Of House No. 730, Dhadda House, Gopal Ji Ka Rasta, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
 ----Petitioners Versus
1. The Assistant Commissioner-I, Devasthan Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 

2. The Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Rajasthan, Udaipur. 

3. Ajay Jain Son Of Late Shri Manak Raj Munot, R/o Raj Vihar Mile, 6/4, Tonk Road, Airport, Sanganer, Jaipur (2 of 20) [Cw-1416/2018] (Raj.)
 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajeet Bhandari, Adv. with Mr. Jitendra Mishra, Adv.
C.R No. 6893 of 2018                                              -1-


       In The High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At
                      Chandigarh


                                                 Date of Decision: 05.02.2020.

1. Cr. No.6893 of 2018



Sunil Dutt Bansal &Ors                                   ...Petitioners

                           Vs.

Jai Bhagwan&Ors.                                         ...Respondents



2. Cr. No.7404 of 2018

Sunil Dutt Bansal                                        ...Petitioner

                           Vs.

Jai Bhagwan&Ors.                                        ...Respondents



Coram: Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin



Present: Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Senior Advocate, with
         Mr. Samar Ahluwalia, Advocate, and
         Ms. JanyaSirohi, Advocate, for the petitioners

         Mr. Vikas Bahl, Senior Advocate, with
         Mr. Nikhil Sabharwal, Advocate, for the respondents


Alka Sarin, J.
1

                                      In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras

                                                     Dated: 29.04.2019

                                                          Coram:

                                     The Honourable Mr.Justice S.Manikumar
                                                     And
                                     The Honourable Mr. Justice M.Venugopal

                                                 C.M.A.No.2249 of 2015
                                                    M.P.No.1 of 2015


                      Dr.V.Sridevi                                       .. Appellant

                                                             vs.

                      Dr.C.S.Mani                                        .. Respondent



                      Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of the
                      Family Courts Act, against the order passed by the IIIrd Additional Family
                      Court at Chennai in I.A.No.3648 of 2011 in O.P.No.3499 of 2009, dated
                      20.07.2015.



                                     For Appellant           : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan,
                                                               Senior Counsel
                                                               for Mr.L.Chandrakumar

                                     For Respondent          : Mr.N.G.R.Prasad
                                                               for M/s.Row & Reddy




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                          2

                                                    Judgment
Honble Dr. Justice B. Siva Sankara Rao        

Writ Petition Nos.5978 of 2017   

22.03.2018 

Sri A. Murali and another .Petitioners

The State of Andhra Pradesh,  rep. by its Principal Secretary,  Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi

Counsel for Petitioner:  Sri P. Gangarami Reddy

Counsel for Respondents:Learned Government Pleader      

 for Municipal Administration for respondent No.1. 

 Sri Md.Saleem, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 Sri M. Ravindra, learned counsel for <Gist: 
>Head Note:    
? Citations:  
1. (1978) 1 Ap Lj 459
2. Air 1956 Sc 110 
3. 1990(2) Alt 202 (D.B.)
4. 1976 Air (Sc) 1785
5. 2007 (5) Alt 676
6. Air 1995 Ap 17 
7. 1991 Air 1453
8. 2006 Air Scw 5192  
9. (2004) 8 Scc 733
10. (1999) 6 Scc 464 
11. (2000) 7 Scc 425 
12. 2016 (4) Alt 426
13. 2009 (15) Scc 705 
14. (2013) 5 Scc 336 
15. (2006) 7 Scc 597 In The High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad For The State Of Telangana And The State Of Andhra Pradesh + Writ Petition Nos.5978 and 9673 of 2017 Sri A. Murali and another .Petitioners Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District and three others. 

 Respondents Date Of Judgment
1

     Item No.3                         Court 6 (Video Conferencing)                        Section Xvii-A

                                        S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                 I N D I A
                                                Record Of Proceedings

                                          Civil Appeal Diary No(s).13886/2020

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-10-2019
     in Ea No. 11106/2017 passed by the Custom Excise Service Tax
     Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad)

     Commissioner Of Central Excise And St Daman                                       Appellant(s)

                                                               Versus

     Firmenich Aromatic India Private Limited                                          Respondent(s)

     (With Ia No.81178/2020-CONDONATION                               Of    Delay     In   Filing   and   Ia
     No.81179/2020-EX-PARTE Stay)

     Date : 12-02-2021 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

     Coram :
                                 Hon'Ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
                                 Hon'Ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

     For Petitioner(s)                         Mr.   Balbir Singh, Asg
                                               Mr.   A.K. Panda, Sr. Adv.
                                               Mr.   Rupesh Kumar, Adv.
                                               Mr.   B. Krishna Prasad, Aor


                                Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                       O R D E R
:1:



 In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru

      Dated This The 8Th Day Of January, 2021

                         Before

      The Hon'Ble Mr.Justice K.Somashekar

         Criminal Petition No. 580 Of 2017

Between
Sri T. Karthik Raja
Aged about 38 years
S/o Thyagaraj
A.K. International
No.66, 2nd Right Cross
Puttappa Colony
New Thippasandra
Bengaluru - 560 075.                       ... Petitioner
(By Sri. Abhinav .R, Advocate)

And
Sri V.M. Prabhakar
Aged about 48 years
S/o Late V.K. Madhavan
M/s. Maruthi Ginger Traders
Main Road, Kudige
Kushalnagar Hobli
Somwarpet Taluk
Kodagu District - 571 234.                ... Respondent

(By Sri V.R. Sarathy, Advocate)

     This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to quash the
proceedings in Pcr No.117/2016 (C.C.No.433/2016) on
the file of Civil Judge and Jmfc, Kushalnagar at
Annexure-A as well as the complaint filed by the
                             :2:



Respondent in Pcr No.117/2016 dated 09.06.2016 before
the Civil Judge and Jmfc, Kushalnagar at Bangalore vide
Annexure-B.

      This Criminal Petition coming on for Admission, this
day, the court made the following:


                         Order
1

                            Before The Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court

                                              Dated :     27.04.2019


                                                        Coram:
                              The Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani

                                           C.M.A(MD)No.864 of 2014

                           Judgment reserved on                  Judgment pronounced on
                                 01.11.2018                            27.04.2019

                      Brinks Arya India Private Ltd.,
                      Having Office at 3/85-C,
                      Arun Nagar Vadavalli,
                      Coimbatore District,
                      Tramilnadu                                             ... Appellant

                                                    Vs.

                      1.G.Bama
                      2.G.Thulasi
                      3.Minor G.Lenin
                        (rep. By his mother and
                        next friend 1st respondent)
                      4.Rengappa Reddi
                      5.Rukkumani
                      6.National Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                        Through its Divisional Manager,
                        Having office at North Veli Street,
                        Madurai 625 001.                                     ... Respondents


                      Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                      Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award dated 02.11.2009 made
                      in M.C.O.P.No.830 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court,
                      (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal), Madurai.


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                       2


                                 For Appellant             : Mr.D.Sivaraman
                                 For R1 to R5              : Mr.K.Murugesan
                                 For R6                    : Mr.J.S.Murali

                                                 Judgment
*      In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi
                                 Reserved on: 12.10.2018
                               Pronounced on: 22.04.2019

+      Lpa No.359/2017, Cm Nos.17922/2017, 20160/2017, 33383-
       84/2017, 47167/2017 & 660/2018

       Bayer Corporation                    ..... Appellant
               Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.
               Sanjay Kumar, Ms. Arpita Sawhney and Mr. Arun
               Kumar Jana, Advs.

                     versus

       Union Of India & Ors                   ..... Respondents
                Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Cgsc with
                Mr. T.P. Singh and Mr. Shashwat Jain, Advs. for
                R-1 & 6.
                Ms. Rajeshwari, Adv. for R-2 & 5.
                Ms. Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr. Vivek Ranjan
                and Mr. Devanshu Khanna, Advocates for
                Interveners.

+      Rfa(Os)(Comm) 6/2017, Cm Nos.17508/2017 & 32128-
       29/2017

       Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh & Anr
                                                ..... Appellants
                Through: Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Advocate
                with Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Nishchal Anand and
                Mr. Sanchith Shivakumar, Advs.

                     versus

       Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ..... Respondent
                Through: Ms. Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr. Vivek
                Ranjan and Mr. Devanshu Khanna, Advs.




Fao (Os) (Comm) 169/2017                                     Page 1 of 90
        Coram:
       Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
       Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva
Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
%
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam           (Cr)
                                Present

            The Honourable Mr. Justice Alexander Thomas

      Monday ,The 01St Day Of October 2018 / 9Th Aswina, 1940

                        WP(C).No. 31900 of 2018

Petitioner/S:

                C.P.Ashok Kumar
                Aged 61 Years, S/O.A.P.Achuthan Nair,
                Kannath Valappil House
                (Anand Nivas), Arangottukara Po,
                Pin 679532,
                Thrissur District, Near Thirumittacode

                By Advs.
                P. Radhakrishnan
                Sri.Madhu Radhakrishnan
                M.D. Joseph
                Sri.Nelson Joseph


Respondent/S:
       1      Sub Registrar
              Thrithala,
              Office Of The Sub Registrar, Thrithala 679534,
              Palakkad District.

      2         Inspector General Of Registration
                Department Of Registration, Vanchiyoor,
                Thiruvananthpauram-695035.


Other Present:
             Smt.A.C.Vidhya, Govt.Pleader


    This Writ Petition (Civil) Having Come Up For Admission On
    01.10.2018, The Court On The Same Day Delivered The
    Following:
 W.P.(C)No.31900/2018                      2

                                                                        (Cr)
                          Alexander Thomas, J.
                   -------------------------------------------
                           W.P.(C)No.31900 of 2018
                 ----------------------------------------------
                                   Judgment
-: 1 :-
                                                                          R.P. Nos. 1399/2017
                                                                                 & 1401/2017


 High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Bench At Indore
     [Division Bench: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vivek Rusia
     And Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amar Nath (Kesharwani)]

                             R.P. No. 1399 of 2017
Chief Executive Officer, Dewas Development Authority,
District Dewas.
                                                                      ---Petitioner.
                                         Versus

1.     Umar Ali S/o. Wazib Ali, Aged 52 years, Occ. Agriculture.
2.     Afsar Ali S/o. Wazib Ali, Aged 45 years, Occ. Agriculture.
3.     Bismillah Bi W/o. Wazib Ali, Aged 52 years, Occ. None.
       All R/o. Sulpur Tehsil, District Dewas.
4.     State of M.P. Through Collector, Dewas/
       Land Acquisition Officer, Collectorate Office, Dewas.
5.     Commissioner (Revenue) Ujjain Division,.
       Commissioner Office, Ujjain.
                                                             ---Respondents.

                             R.P. No. 1401 of 2017
Chief Executive Officer, Dewas Development Authority,
District Dewas.
                                                                      ---Petitioner.
                                         Versus

1.     Rehmat Ali S/o. Nazir Ali, Aged 70 years, Occ. Agriculture.
2.     Decd. Kalu S/o. Nazir Ali through L.R's -
       a) Mumtaj Bi W/o. Late Kalu, Aged Adult, Occ. Housewife
       b) Ramjan S/o. Late Kalu, Aged Adult, Occ. Agriculture.
       c) Kubran Ali S/o. Kalu, Aged Adult, Occ. Agriculture.
       d) Jaajid Ali S/o. Kalu, Aged Adult, Occ. Agriculture
       All R/o.Gram Rasulpur Tehsil, District Dewas.
3.     State of M.P. Through Collector, Dewas/
       Land Acquisition Officer, Collectorate Office, Dewas.
4.     Commissioner (Revenue) Ujjain Division,.
       Commissioner Office, Ujjain.
                                                             ---Respondents.

                          .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
         Shri Aviral Vikas Khare, learned counsel for the Review Petitioner.
          Shri Aditya Garg, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents/State.
          Shri Rajeev Kumar Jain, Advocate on behalf of Shri K.L. Hardia,
     learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3 in R.P. No. 1399/2017 and
                 respondents No.1 & 2 in R.P. No.1401/2017.
                          .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
                                        -: 2 :-
                                                                  R.P. Nos. 1399/2017
                                                                         & 1401/2017


                                     Order
$~
* In The High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi

%                                 Date of Decision: 14th December, 2018

+     Mac.App. 163/2018

      Babli Dixit & Anr                                  ..... Appellants
                     Through:         Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate

                         versus

      Satendra Kumar & Ors
      (Iffco Tokio Gen Ins Co Ltd )            ..... Respondents
                    Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for
                              Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for R3.

                            Judgement
In The High Court At Calcutta
                      Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                Original Side



Present: The Hon'ble Justice Samapti Chatterjee




                                  Wp 134 of 2016


                          Smt. Kalpana Poddar & Ors.
                                  Vs
                       State of West Bengal & Ors.




For the Petitioners          : Mr. Sarvapriyo Mukherjee, Advocate
                               Ms. Sananda Ganguly, Advocate


For the Respondent Bank      : Mr. Avratosh Majumder, Advocate
                               Mr. Prithu Dudheria, Advocate




Heard on                     : 20.07.2018, 03.08.2018, 27.08.2018,
                               10.09.2018, 14.09.2018, 28.09.2018,
                               05.10.2018, 16.11.2018, 25.01.2018,
                               04.02.2019, 15.02.2019, 22.02.2019,
                               04.03.2019, 11.04.2019 & 17.04.2019.



Judgment on                  : July 12, 2019.
 Samapti Chatterjee, J.
1

                                            In The Supreme Court Of India
                                             Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

                                               Civil Appeal No 366 of 2022
                                          (Arising out of Slp(C) No 8208 of 2020)


     The Patiala Central Cooperative Bank Ltd
     Patiala & Ors                                                                 .... Appellant(s)


                                                          Versus


     Jaswinder Singh                                                               ....Respondent(s)




                                                        Order
Cra-D-568-Db of 2011                                           1

      In The High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At
                     Chandigarh


(1)                                                  Cra-D-568-Db of 2011

Shyam Singh and another
                                                          .... Appellants

                                        Versus
State of Haryana
                                                         ..... Respondent

(2)                                                  Cra-D-592-Db of 2011

Pardeep Soni @ Mintu and another
                                                          .... Appellants

                                        Versus
State of Haryana
                                                         ..... Respondent


                         Reserved on : 08.02.2019
                       Date of decision : 26.02.2019


Coram :- Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma
            Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh


Present:    Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Senior Advocate, with
            Mr. Vishal R. Lamba and Mr. Himmat Singh Deol, Advocates,
            for the appellants (in Cra-D-568-Db of 2011).

            Mr. J.S. Bedi, Senior Advocate, with
            Mr. Harsimranjeet Kaur and Mr. Shivansh Mahi, Advocates,
            for the appellants (in Cra-D-592-Db of 2011)

            Ms. Shubhra Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

            Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate,
            for the complainant.

                   ***


                              1 of 39
           ::: Downloaded on - 18-03-2019 07:41:28 :::
 Cra-D-568-Db of 2011                                          2

Rajiv Sharma, J.
dss                            1   Judgment-wp-10835-18-g.doc

        In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay
                Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
               Writ Petition No. 10835 Of 2018

 Xyz                                                   ... Petitioner
      Versus
 Union of India and ors.                               ... Respondents

 Mr. D.J. Khambatta, Sr. Advocate (Amicus Curiae) a/w. Ms
 Naira Jejeebhoy and Mr. Pheroze F. Mehta.
 Ms Gayatri Singh, Sr. Advocate a/w. Ms Aditi Saxena, Ms
 Meenaz Kakalia and Mr. Kranti L.C. for the Petitioner.
 Mr. Anil C. Singh, A.S.G. a/w. Mrs. Purnima Awasti a/w Ms
 Anusha Pravin Amin and Ms Geetika Gandhi for Respondent
 Nos.1 and 3.
 Mr.AB. Vagyani, Government Pleader a/w. Mr Y.S. Khochare,
 Agp and Mr. P.P. More, Agp and Mr. Udayan Shah for
 Respondent No.2.
 Mr. Rajiv Chavan, Sr. Advocate a/w. Ms Priyanka Chavan, Ms
 Anupama Pawar I/b Mr. D.S. Shingade, Mr. Vinod Mahadik,
 Dr.Madhavi Patil and R.N. Cooper Hospital for Mcgm.

                                  With
                      Writ Petition No. 9748 Of 2018
 Xyz                                           ... Petitioner
      Versus
 Union of India and ors.                               ... Respondents

 Ms Gayatri Singh, Sr. Advocate a/w. Ms Aditi Saxena, Ms
 Meenaz Kakalia and Mr. Kranti L.C. for the Petitioner.
 Mr.AB. Vagyani, Government Pleader a/w. Mr Y.S. Khochare,
 Agp and Mr. P.P. More, Agp and Mr. Udayan Shah for
 Respondent No.2.

                               With
               Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                 Writ Petition (L) No. 3172 Of 2018

 Xyz                                                   ... Petitioner
      Versus
 Union of India and anr.                               ... Respondents
 Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam for the Petitioner.

                                                                          1 of 78




::: Uploaded on - 03/04/2019                 ::: Downloaded on - 04/04/2019 04:17:27 :::
   dss                              2   Judgment-wp-10835-18-g.doc

 Ms Poornima Awasthi for Respondent No.1 - Uoi.
 Ms P.H. Kantharia,Government Pleader a/w. Ms Deepali
 Patankar, Assistant to G.P. for Respondent No.2- State.
                                .....

                           Coram : A. S. Oka And M. S. Sonak, Jj.


 Reserved On : 2nd November 2018. 

 Pronounced On : 3rd April, 2019. 

 Judgment
In The High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam
                             Present
           The Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran
     Tuesday, The 13Th Day Of July 2021 / 22Nd Ashadha, 1943
                      Op(C) No. 446 Of 2021
    Against The Order Dated 06.02.02021 In E.A.No.780/2020 In
     E.P.No.565/2020 In Os 163/1977 Of I Additional District
                       Court, Ernakulam,
Petitioner:
0



           George Varghese.P, Aged 55 Years
           Pandyamyalil House, Kanjiramattom.P.O,
           Ernakulam-682315.
           By Advs.
           Sri.P.Ravindran (Sr.)
           Shri.Sreekumar S
           Sri.N.Raghuraj
Respondents:

 1 Fr. A.J.Abraham, Aged 46 Years, S/O.A.T.Jacob,Vicar,St.Ignatius Orthodox Syrian Church,Kanjiramattom,Ernakulam District-682315. 

 2 K.I.Thankachan, Aged 53 Years, S/O Ittan,Trustee,St.Ignatius Orthodox Syrian Church,Kanjiramattom,Ernakulam District-682315. 

 3 Peter N Chacko, Aged 61 Years, S/O Chacko,Manager Elected,St.Ignatius Vocational Higher Secondary School,Kanjiramattom,Ernakulam District-682315, Nedumattathil House,Chethikkode.P.O, Ernakulam. 

 4 M.K.Geore, Vazhakkalayil House,Chethikkode.P.O, Ex-Trustee,St.Ignatius Orthodox Syrian Church,Kani- Ramattom,Ernakulam -682315. 

 5 M.T.Issac, Ex-Trustee,St.Ignatius Orthodox Syrian Church,Kan- Jiramattom,Ernakulam District-682315. 

 6 Saju P.Poulose, S/O Poulose,Pallamkunnel House,Chethicode, Kanjiramattom,Ernakulam District-682315(Ex- Trustee). 

 7 V.G.Kuriakose, Kaniyamparambil House,Ex-Trustee,Kanjiramattom, O.P.(C)No.446 of 2021 & :-2-:
C.R.P.No.81 of 2021 Ernakulam District-682315. 

 8 The District Educational Officer, Office Of The District Educational Officer,Ernaku- Lam-682011. 

 By Advs. 

 Sri.S.Sreekumar (Sr.) Smt.Soumiya C.D This Op (Civil) Having Come Up For Admission Along With C.R.P.No.81 Of 2021 On 09.04.2021 And Thereafter On 04.06.2021, 08.06.2021, 21.06.2021 And 30.06.2021 For Further Arguments, The Court On 13.07.2021 Delivered The Following:
 The Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran Tuesday, The 13Th Day Of July 2021 / 22Nd Ashadha, 1943 Crp No. 81 Of 2021 Against The Common Order Dated 06.02.02021 In E.P.No.565/2020 In Os 163/1977 Of The I Additional District Court, Ernakulam Revision Petitioners/Judgment
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
 
 

Afr
 
Reserved on 29.4.2019
 
Delivered on 13.05.2019
 
Case :- Criminal Appeal No. - 1426 of 2005
 

 
Appellant :- Rama Pasi And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
 
Counsel for Appellant :- A.V.S. Chauhan,Manish Kumar Yadav (Amicu,R B S Rathaur,S N Pandey,S.M. Mohsin Zaidi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
 
along with 
 
Case :- Criminal Appeal No. - 1530 of 2005
 

 
Appellant :- Matauley @ Khushi Ram
 
Respondent :- The State Of U.P.
 
Counsel for Appellant :- Arun Sinha,(Amicus Curie),Balram Singh,Dinesh Kumar,Manish Kumar Singh Yadav
 
Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
 

 
Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.


Hon'ble Virendra Kumar-II,J.
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad
 
 

Reserved on 01.04.2022
 
Delivered on 12.04.2022
 
Court No. - 10
 

 
Case :- Second Appeal No. - 203 of 2021
 

 
Appellant :- M/S Reptakos Brett Company Limited
 
Respondent :- M/S Utkarsh Granite Private Limited
 
Counsel for Appellant :- Pankaj Agarwal, ,Akash Deep Srivastava
 
Counsel for Respondent :- K.M. Tripathi,Krishna Mohan Tripathi,Sunil Kumar
 

 
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Counsel for appellants contended that who is the Jagirdar against whom the legal fiction is to apply, is not pleaded by the claim petitioners and the scope and ambit of Rule 2 of the Rules regarding 'Grant of Pattadari rights in non-Khalsa villages', 1356 Fasli framed under Section 172 of the Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli is nebulous.
The petitioner Sukhbir Kataria, who is accused no.14 in Criminal Complaint bearing No.74136 dated 04.06.2013 (Annexure P-1) titled as 'Om Parkash Vs. Satish Kumar and others' seeks quashing of the same alongwith the summoning order dated 22.07.2013 (Annexure P-2), whereby he had been summoned to face trial under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC.
2. T. Vasanthakumar -vs- Vijayakumari, reported in AIR 2015 Supreme Court 2240 wherein it has held that Negotiable Instruments Act (26 of 1881), Ss.138 and 139 -  C.C.NO.7919/2017 Dishonour of Cheque - Appeal against acquittal - Cheque as well as signature on it not disputed by accused respondent -
The petition was filed through Sh. Vijay Pahwa, General Power of Attorney and it was asserted in the petition under Section 13-B of the Rent Act that 1 of 23 50% share of the demised premises had been purchased by the landlord from Sh. Vinod Malhotra vide sale deed No.4226 registered on 20.12.2007 with Sub Registrar, Chandigarh.
The management witness Shri Gopinath Dasgupta - DRM North Bengal Regional Office, Ramprakash Sarkar - sub- staff Mahabirsthan Branch as well as Ms. Omit Namchu management witness stated in their examination in chief that the appellant made a confessional statement in writing accepting the fraudulent withdrawal of Rs.23,000/-only from the bank account of Shri Mrinal Kanti Ghosh.
, in Laxmi Pat Surana v. Union Bank of India, Civil Appeal No. 2734 of 2020, a judgment delivered on 26.03.2021, this Court, after referring to various judgments of this Court, including the judgment in Babulal Vardharji Gurjar v. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries (P) Ltd., (2020) 15 SCC 1 [“Babulal”], then held:
 “35