Q: the songs that can still be experienced as single pieces which are strong enough for them to be considered "good", could also have a double triple however many as you much meaning at the whole picture, and n many songs could still be themselves in their own way? one doesn't even need to publish them one at a time, simply just planning the whole process at the writing is enough to make it so, i guess, and they could come as singles, when finished also as a whole with the extra album touches if necessary. and as far as i understood you have no problems in the writing departmant which comes like a natural language to you. this would only differentiate the process of writ
 ing, the amount of production that will be needed to put in would not rise, since there are still n many of songs which is lesser than the amount that you are already going to make? maybe i'm a sucker for continuity and your work and just want to listen to an album that has been made from you, i don't know. but you also don't seem like being a person who willingly refuses having more meaning, especially when the work going to be done is not exponentially increasing, which it doesn't seem like at this case. am i missing something?
A: i think so. i think you are putting me on the wrong side of the argument. i am arguing for something 'more' meaningful than an album, not less. in my opinion, at the length of an album, there's much stronger ways to use the same amount of time, in terms of creative audio/visual content. in my opinion