Q: What are your perceptions and/or deductions about the growing population around the world, due to increasing means to support children and less present factors that reduce population (i.e. Famine, disease, war, etc)? Do you think there will ever be government-implemented actions to reduce this increase, like restrictions on family size, or public awareness campaigns? What do you expect the reactions would be towards pushed legislation, and how would such arguments regarding rights and freedoms hold up against the possible detriments of reaching a point where food, water, and other resources are inadequate to support the people, leading into collapse of organized society, or government enforced regulation of food supplies and distribution? Is the forementioned distopia-like situation a ridiculous extreme? Would people be willing to accept the concept of a country stagnant in population growth over the personal shock of being limited to
  only on
 e or two children? How would the classes face this problem differently? Would the same laws apply to them, or would they be eligible to pay a hefty sum for the right to have anadditional child/children? Would religious groups earn separate benefits, as family dynamic is important in many of their teachings?
A: we will continue to compete for survival and resources, just like we have done since the beginning. unless of course we invent our way out of that cycle, which ironically we are well on our way to doing