text
stringlengths 0
74.9k
| label_text
stringclasses 4
values |
---|---|
Sender:
Reply-To: harmons@gyro.WV.TEK.COM (Harmon Sommer)
Distribution:
Organization: /usr/ens/etc/organization
Keywords:
Unless they have been taught to "neck rein". Then the left rein is brought
to bear on the left side of horse's neck to go right. | rec.motorcycles |
record
hand | rec.sport.baseball |
: The next question is how shall I carry the thing on the bike, given
: the metal frame and all. I have a big backrest (approx 12" high) and
: was hoping that I would be able to bungee cord the backpack to the backrest.
: Any one have any experiences on such experimentation?
Put the pack on the pillion and bungee it to the backrest.
If that is not possible then you should be able to bungee it behind the
backrest, just make sure it doesn't bend or break anything like the rear
fender or turnsignals.
-- | rec.motorcycles |
Anyone,
I am a serious motorcycle enthusiast without a motorcycle, and to
put it bluntly, it sucks. I really would like some advice on what would
be a good starter bike for me. I do know one thing however, I need to
make my first bike a good one, because buying a second any time soon is
out of the question. I am specifically interested in racing bikes, (CBR
600 F2, GSX-R 750). I know that this may sound kind of crazy
considering that I've never had a bike before, but I am responsible, a
fast learner, and in love. Please give me any advice that you think
would help me in my search, including places to look or even specific
bikes that you want to sell me.
Thanks :-) | rec.motorcycles |
Alright, beat this automobile sighting.
Driving along just a hair north of Atlanta, I noticed an old, run down
former car dealership which appeared to deal with, and repair, older
rare or exotic foreign sports cars. I saw:
Ford GT-40 (!), the famous model from Ford, that seemed to win most of
its races in the late 60s, including Le-Mans 4 or 6 times.
Two Jensen Interceptors, one a convertable, one a hatchback?
Porsche 911 (boring compared to the rest)
THREE Ferarries, a Mondial, a 308 prepared for racing, and a red 60s model
that I couldn't identify.
And at the bottom, a late 70s MG convertable.
Outside there was a rotting Rover 3500 saloon, which was never regularly
sold in the U.S.
And in the showroom, there was a small italian body, either an Alpha Romeo
or a Lancia. It was about the size of an Austin Mini.
The trunklid was missing, exposing a boot with a voltage regulator
in the upper left corner of the wall, and a chunk of metal removed from
the floor on the right hand side as if something would leave the trunk
and go to the outside from here.
The taillights looked like they
would be the round type (if they were there). Does anyone know what the
make of this one is?
Certainly made my day... | rec.autos |
Anyone around here read this yet?
Does Anita have a number?
Tony | rec.motorcycles |
Individual leaders by total points (Final standings)
NOTE: Games played and points per games not accurate !!
Player Team GP G A Pts ppg Prj PIM +/-
M.Lemieux PIT 59 69 91 160 2.71 160 38 53
LaFontaine BUF 82 53 95 148 1.80 148 63 13
Oates BOS 83 45 97 142 1.71 142 32 12
Yzerman DET 83 58 79 137 1.65 137 44 33
Turgeon NYI 80 58 74 132 1.65 132 26 -2
Selanne WIN 82 76 56 132 1.61 132 45 6
Mogilny BUF 75 76 51 127 1.69 127 40 9
Gilmour TOR 81 32 95 127 1.57 127 96 32
Robitaille LA 82 63 62 125 1.52 127 100 16
Recchi PHI 81 53 70 123 1.52 123 95 -2
Sundin QUE 79 47 67 114 1.44 114 96 19
Stevens PIT 71 55 57 112 1.58 112 169 16
Bure VAN 82 60 50 110 1.34 110 67 37
Tocchet PIT 79 48 61 109 1.38 109 240 28
Roenick CHI 82 50 57 107 1.30 107 82 15
Janney STL 82 24 82 106 1.29 106 12 1
Sakic QUE 77 48 57 105 1.36 105 40 -4
Juneau BOS 83 32 70 102 1.23 102 33 21
Hull STL 78 54 47 101 1.29 101 41 -21
Andreychuk TOR 81 55 45 100 1.23 100 56 4
Fleury CAL 82 34 66 100 1.22 100 88 15
Francis PIT 83 24 76 100 1.20 100 68 6
Housley WIN 78 18 79 97 1.24 97 52 -13
Ciccarelli DET 81 41 56 97 1.20 97 81 12
Damphousse MON 82 39 58 97 1.18 97 96 5
Hawerchuk BUF 79 16 80 96 1.22 96 48 -14
Shanahan STL 69 51 43 94 1.36 94 168 9
Muller MON 79 37 57 94 1.19 94 75 9
Jagr PIT 80 34 60 94 1.18 94 69 31
Modano MIN 80 33 60 93 1.16 93 81 -6
Messier NYR 72 25 66 91 1.26 91 70 -3
Sanderson HAR 79 46 43 89 1.13 89 28 -24
Reichel CAL 78 40 48 88 1.13 88 54 23
Bellows MON 80 40 48 88 1.10 88 42 4
Fedorov DET 72 34 53 87 1.21 87 72 33
Thomas NYI 76 37 50 87 1.14 87 109 0
Coffey DET 79 12 75 87 1.10 87 77 16
Kurri LA 81 27 60 87 1.07 88 38 20
Bradley TB 78 42 44 86 1.10 86 90 -22
Brind'Amour PHI 78 37 49 86 1.10 86 87 -9
Ronning VAN 77 29 56 85 1.10 85 30 16
Bondra WAS 80 37 48 85 1.06 85 70 3
Cassels HAR 81 21 64 85 1.05 85 57 -15
Murphy PIT 82 22 62 84 1.02 84 73 42
Bourque BOS 78 19 63 82 1.05 82 40 38
Granato LA 79 37 45 82 1.04 83 165 3
Verbeek HAR 81 39 43 82 1.01 82 180 -11
Ridley WAS 81 26 56 82 1.01 82 38 4
Duchesne QUE 81 20 62 82 1.01 82 57 15
C.Lemieux NJ 75 30 51 81 1.08 81 149 0
Suter CAL 80 23 58 81 1.01 81 112 -1
Lebeau MON 69 31 49 80 1.16 80 20 23
Roberts CAL 57 38 41 79 1.39 79 172 31
Semak NJ 80 37 42 79 0.99 79 70 22
Hatcher WAS 80 34 45 79 0.99 79 110 -12
D.Hunter WAS 81 20 59 79 0.98 79 194 2
Courtnall MIN 82 36 43 79 0.96 79 49 -2
Brown STL 69 25 53 78 1.13 78 56 -4
Ricci QUE 76 27 51 78 1.03 78 121 9
Kisio SJ 77 26 52 78 1.01 78 90 -15
Craven VAN 76 25 52 77 1.01 77 30 0
G.Courtnall VAN 82 31 46 77 0.94 77 167 23
Nolan QUE 72 36 40 76 1.06 76 185 -6
King NYI 74 38 38 76 1.03 76 45 -1
Amonte NYR 80 33 43 76 0.95 76 47 0
Gagner MIN 82 33 43 76 0.93 76 141 -15
Lindros PHI 58 41 34 75 1.29 75 143 25
Hogue NYI 67 33 42 75 1.12 75 106 6
Nieuwendyk CAL 77 38 37 75 0.97 75 52 8
Pivonka WAS 66 21 53 74 1.12 74 51 12
Borschevsky TOR 76 34 40 74 0.97 74 26 32
Dahlen MIN 81 35 39 74 0.91 74 6 -18
Richer NJ 76 38 35 73 0.96 73 44 0
Emerson STL 80 22 51 73 0.91 73 60 -1
Nedved VAN 82 38 35 73 0.89 73 94 18
Chelios CHI 82 15 58 73 0.89 73 282 13
Carson LA 84 37 36 73 0.87 74 30 2
Zhamnov WIN 66 25 47 72 1.09 72 58 5
Kvartalnov BOS 72 30 42 72 1.00 72 14 9
Steen WIN 78 22 50 72 0.92 72 75 -8
Linden VAN 82 33 39 72 0.88 72 60 15
Mullen PIT 71 33 37 70 0.99 70 12 21
Larmer CHI 82 35 35 70 0.85 70 48 22
Donnelly LA 82 29 40 69 0.84 70 45 18
Kovalenko QUE 80 27 41 68 0.85 68 57 10
Gartner NYR 81 45 23 68 0.84 68 55 -2
Khristich WAS 61 31 36 67 1.10 67 26 26
Sheppard DET 70 32 34 66 0.94 66 29 7
Garpenlov SJ 78 22 44 66 0.85 66 56 -25
Iafrate WAS 81 25 41 66 0.81 66 169 15
Gretzky LA 43 16 49 65 1.51 67 6 6
Zalapski HAR 80 14 51 65 0.81 65 86 -32
Graves NYR 81 36 29 65 0.80 65 148 -4
Anderson TOR 74 21 43 64 0.86 64 117 19
Zelepukin NJ 76 23 41 64 0.84 64 66 16
MacIver OTT 78 17 46 63 0.81 63 80 -42
Dineen PHI 80 35 28 63 0.79 63 199 11
Chiasson DET 78 12 50 62 0.79 62 151 15
Ysebaert DET 79 34 28 62 0.78 62 42 19
Galley PHI 80 13 49 62 0.78 62 98 14
McEachern PIT 83 28 33 61 0.73 61 46 21
Nicholls NJ 67 13 47 60 0.90 60 80 -13
Keane MON 75 15 45 60 0.80 60 93 28
Flatley NYI 77 13 47 60 0.78 60 61 3
S.Young QUE 81 30 30 60 0.74 60 20 4
Shannon WIN 82 20 40 60 0.73 60 91 -4
Fedyk PHI 74 21 38 59 0.80 59 48 14
Blake LA 76 16 43 59 0.78 60 152 18
Olausson WIN 66 16 41 57 0.86 57 22 -5
Makarov CAL 70 18 39 57 0.81 57 40 0
Smith CHI 76 10 47 57 0.75 57 212 13
Elynuik WAS 77 22 35 57 0.74 57 66 2
Stevens NJ 79 12 45 57 0.72 57 116 16
Adams VAN 51 25 31 56 1.10 56 14 33
Tucker TB 76 17 39 56 0.74 56 69 -10
MacInnis CAL 48 11 43 54 1.13 54 59 15
Sutter CHI 63 20 34 54 0.86 54 65 9
Bodger BUF 80 9 45 54 0.68 54 87 14
Nemchinov NYR 81 23 31 54 0.67 54 34 15
Driver NJ 81 14 40 54 0.67 54 64 -9
Ruuttu CHI 82 17 37 54 0.66 54 134 14
Yake HAR 63 22 31 53 0.84 53 44 5
Turcotte NYR 68 25 28 53 0.78 53 40 -2
Sandstrom LA 37 25 27 52 1.41 53 51 11
Malakhov NYI 61 14 38 52 0.85 52 59 14
Ward VAN 68 22 30 52 0.76 52 82 32
Otto CAL 74 19 33 52 0.70 52 150 2
Kontos TB 66 27 24 51 0.77 51 12 -7
Leach BOS 78 26 25 51 0.65 51 126 -6
Poulin HAR 78 20 31 51 0.65 51 37 -19
Tkachuk WIN 81 28 23 51 0.63 51 199 -14
Savard MON 62 16 34 50 0.81 50 90 2
Norton NYI 63 12 38 50 0.79 50 45 -6
Cullen TOR 64 18 32 50 0.78 50 109 -23
Cote WAS 74 21 29 50 0.68 50 34 28
Eklund PHI 52 11 38 49 0.94 49 16 8
Olczyk NYR 68 21 28 49 0.72 49 52 -1
Semenov VAN 74 12 37 49 0.66 49 32 16
Davydov WIN 77 28 21 49 0.64 49 64 -2
Miller STL 80 24 25 49 0.61 49 96 0
Poulin BOS 83 16 33 49 0.59 49 62 30
Klima EDM 66 32 16 48 0.73 48 98 -15
Dionne MON 73 20 28 48 0.66 48 55 6
Baker OTT 74 19 29 48 0.65 48 52 -21
Rucinsky QUE 76 18 30 48 0.63 48 51 14
Weight EDM 76 17 31 48 0.63 48 65 5
Zhitnik LA 76 12 36 48 0.63 49 78 -2
MacLean NJ 78 24 24 48 0.62 48 100 -7
Corson EDM 78 16 31 47 0.60 47 207 -16
Sweeney BUF 79 21 26 47 0.59 47 118 4
Simpson EDM 60 24 22 46 0.77 46 36 -14
Hawgood PHI 66 11 35 46 0.70 46 68 -9
Johansson WAS 74 7 38 45 0.61 45 54 0
Miller WAS 81 18 27 45 0.56 45 32 -1
Manson EDM 81 15 30 45 0.56 45 210 -26
Desjardins MON 81 13 32 45 0.56 45 98 19
Schneider MON 58 13 31 44 0.76 44 89 9
Goulet CHI 63 23 21 44 0.70 44 41 10
Leclair MON 70 19 25 44 0.63 44 33 11
Drake DET 71 18 26 44 0.62 44 91 14
Lumme VAN 73 8 36 44 0.60 44 55 29
Gaudreau SJ 58 23 20 43 0.74 43 18 -17
Gill TOR 68 11 32 43 0.63 43 64 4
Turgeon OTT 70 25 18 43 0.61 43 104 -26
Probert DET 79 14 29 43 0.54 43 292 -9
Wood BUF 80 18 25 43 0.54 43 77 7
Ranheim CAL 82 21 22 43 0.52 43 26 -4
Zamuner TB 82 15 28 43 0.52 43 72 -25
Tinordi MIN 69 15 27 42 0.61 42 157 -1
Paslawski CAL 71 18 24 42 0.59 42 12 0
Ruzicka BOS 60 19 22 41 0.68 41 38 -6
Elik EDM 60 14 27 41 0.68 41 56 -4
Kudelski OTT 61 24 17 41 0.67 41 28 -25
McSorley LA 79 15 26 41 0.52 42 393 0
Shaw OTT 79 7 34 41 0.52 41 34 -47
Lidstrom DET 83 7 34 41 0.49 41 28 7
Stastny NJ 60 17 23 40 0.67 40 20 -3
Ellett TOR 68 6 34 40 0.59 40 46 17
Tikkanen NYR 78 16 24 40 0.51 40 94 -22
Niedermayer NJ 78 11 29 40 0.51 40 47 8
Racine DET 79 9 31 40 0.51 40 80 8
McPhee MIN 82 18 22 40 0.49 40 44 -4
Millen LA 40 23 16 39 0.98 40 42 15
Chambers TB 53 10 29 39 0.74 39 34 -23
Holik NJ 59 20 19 39 0.66 39 72 -2
Clark TOR 65 17 22 39 0.60 39 187 3
Khmylev BUF 66 20 19 39 0.59 39 26 6
Creighton TB 81 19 20 39 0.48 39 110 -21
Krushelnyski TOR 82 19 20 39 0.48 39 60 3
Kurvers NYI 49 8 30 38 0.78 38 38 8
Crossman STL 57 10 28 38 0.67 38 28 -6
Kovalev NYR 63 20 18 38 0.60 38 79 -8
Craig MIN 68 15 23 38 0.56 38 106 -10
Krupp NYI 79 9 29 38 0.48 38 67 8
Momesso VAN 82 18 20 38 0.46 38 193 11
Kamensky QUE 31 15 22 37 1.19 37 14 13
Numminen WIN 65 7 30 37 0.57 37 33 4
Pearson TOR 76 23 14 37 0.49 37 196 -2
Graham CHI 82 20 17 37 0.45 37 141 1
Leetch NYR 36 6 30 36 1.00 36 26 2
Ciger EDM 62 13 23 36 0.58 36 8 -14
Beers TB 62 12 24 36 0.58 36 70 -24
Reid BOS 65 20 16 36 0.55 36 10 12
Lapointe QUE 73 10 26 36 0.49 36 98 4
Sjodin MIN 75 7 29 36 0.48 36 30 -25
Weinrich HAR 76 7 29 36 0.47 36 76 -10
Borsato WIN 65 15 20 35 0.54 35 38 -1
Zezel TOR 68 12 23 35 0.51 35 24 -1
Burr DET 79 10 25 35 0.44 35 74 18
Donato BOS 81 15 20 35 0.43 35 61 2
Benning EDM 55 10 24 34 0.62 34 152 -1
Howe DET 59 3 31 34 0.58 34 22 20
Guerin NJ 63 14 20 34 0.54 34 63 16
Hull OTT 67 13 21 34 0.51 34 14 -21
D.Sweeney BOS 83 7 27 34 0.41 34 66 34
Nylander HAR 56 11 22 33 0.59 33 36 -5
Beranek PHI 63 15 18 33 0.52 33 78 -6
Wesley BOS 64 8 25 33 0.52 33 47 -2
Matteau CHI 77 15 18 33 0.43 33 96 6
Broten MIN 80 12 21 33 0.41 33 22 7
Leeman MON 50 15 17 32 0.64 32 24 14
Dalgarno NYI 55 15 17 32 0.58 32 60 16
Mellanby EDM 67 15 17 32 0.48 32 147 -4
Primeau DET 73 15 17 32 0.44 32 152 -6
Gilbert CHI 75 13 19 32 0.43 32 57 5
Mullen NYI 78 18 14 32 0.41 32 28 7
Presley BUF 78 15 17 32 0.41 32 92 5
Leschyshyn QUE 81 9 23 32 0.40 32 55 22
Zubov NYR 46 8 23 31 0.67 31 4 1
Mironov TOR 57 7 24 31 0.54 31 38 -2
Bureau TB 63 10 21 31 0.49 31 111 -12
Brisebois MON 68 10 21 31 0.46 31 77 8
Heinze BOS 72 18 13 31 0.43 31 24 21
Smehlik BUF 78 4 27 31 0.40 31 59 10
Lemieux CHI 79 10 21 31 0.39 31 109 4
Yushkevich PHI 79 5 26 31 0.39 31 71 10
Evason SJ 83 12 19 31 0.37 31 132 -33
McInnis NYI 56 10 20 30 0.54 30 24 7
Noonan CHI 61 16 14 30 0.49 30 82 1
Gallant DET 66 10 20 30 0.45 30 186 20
Kennedy DET 67 19 11 30 0.45 30 46 -1
Hough QUE 77 8 22 30 0.39 30 69 -11
Gusarov QUE 78 8 22 30 0.38 30 57 16
MacTavish EDM 80 10 20 30 0.38 30 110 -15
Buchberger EDM 81 12 18 30 0.37 30 133 -24
Janssens HAR 73 12 17 29 0.40 29 233 -12
U.Samuelson PIT 76 3 26 29 0.38 29 247 37
Sydor LA 78 6 23 29 0.37 29 59 0
Duchesne MIN 82 16 13 29 0.35 29 30 6
Falloon SJ 41 14 14 28 0.68 28 12 -25
Sandlak VAN 59 10 18 28 0.47 28 122 2
Carpenter WAS 65 11 17 28 0.43 28 63 -16
Kron HAR 42 14 13 27 0.64 27 18 7
Ferraro NYI 43 14 13 27 0.63 27 38 -5
Kravchuk EDM 55 10 17 27 0.49 27 32 3
Plavsic VAN 56 6 21 27 0.48 27 51 27
Ron Sutter STL 59 12 15 27 0.46 27 99 -11
Cole TB 65 12 15 27 0.42 27 21 -4
Odgers SJ 65 12 15 27 0.42 27 251 -25
Fitzgerald NYI 74 9 18 27 0.36 27 32 -1
Fetisov NJ 74 4 23 27 0.36 27 158 7
Korolev STL 74 4 23 27 0.36 27 20 -1
Kypreos HAR 75 17 10 27 0.36 27 325 -5
Andersson TB 75 16 11 27 0.36 27 14 -14
Huddy LA 80 2 25 27 0.34 27 62 20
Rich Sutter STL 82 13 14 27 0.33 27 100 -6
Slegr VAN 40 4 22 26 0.65 26 109 16
Svoboda BUF 40 2 24 26 0.65 26 59 3
Patrick NYR 60 5 21 26 0.43 26 61 1
Jones WAS 68 12 14 26 0.38 26 124 16
Lamb OTT 69 7 19 26 0.38 26 62 -40
Osborne TOR 75 12 14 26 0.35 26 87 -7
May BUF 80 13 13 26 0.33 26 238 3
Eagles WIN 82 8 18 26 0.32 26 131 -1
Brunet MON 45 10 15 25 0.56 25 19 13
T.Green NYI 58 7 18 25 0.43 25 43 6
Stern CAL 69 10 15 25 0.36 25 207 2
Lidster VAN 71 6 19 25 0.35 25 36 9
Haller MON 72 11 14 25 0.35 25 117 8
Tippett PIT 73 6 19 25 0.34 25 56 7
Peluso OTT 79 15 10 25 0.32 25 318 -32
DiMaio TB 54 9 15 24 0.44 24 62 0
Brady OTT 55 7 17 24 0.44 24 57 -25
Freer OTT 61 10 14 24 0.39 24 39 -32
Cavallini QUE 66 9 15 24 0.36 24 34 10
Lachance NYI 74 7 17 24 0.32 24 67 -2
Shaw BOS 76 10 14 24 0.32 24 108 9
Berg TOR 78 13 11 24 0.31 24 103 2
Ozolinsh SJ 37 7 16 23 0.62 23 40 -9
Klatt MIN 45 4 19 23 0.51 23 38 6
Loach LA 53 10 13 23 0.43 23 27 3
Todd EDM 55 9 14 23 0.42 23 26 -9
Ashton CAL 56 10 13 23 0.41 23 52 8
McBain OTT 57 7 16 23 0.40 23 43 -35
Gelinas EDM 63 11 12 23 0.37 23 30 2
Bautin WIN 69 5 18 23 0.33 23 92 -2
Krygier WAS 74 11 12 23 0.31 23 60 -14
Johnson MIN 79 3 20 23 0.29 23 105 9
Acton PHI 80 8 15 23 0.29 23 51 -11
Barnes WIN 37 12 10 22 0.59 22 10 -3
Huffman QUE 52 4 18 22 0.42 22 54 0
Sutton BUF 61 8 14 22 0.36 22 30 0
McKay NJ 71 11 11 22 0.31 22 199 1
Konstantinov DET 81 5 17 22 0.27 22 135 23
Pellerin NJ 44 10 11 21 0.48 21 37 -1
Sillinger DET 51 4 17 21 0.41 21 16 0
Volek NYI 56 8 13 21 0.38 21 34 -1
Lindberg CAL 61 9 12 21 0.34 21 18 -4
Evans PHI 65 8 13 21 0.32 21 70 -9
Hamrlik TB 65 6 15 21 0.32 21 65 -20
Gilchrist MIN 68 10 11 21 0.31 21 49 -12
Churla MIN 73 5 16 21 0.29 21 286 -8
Kasparaitis NYI 77 4 17 21 0.27 21 166 14
Loney PIT 81 5 16 21 0.26 21 99 3
Courtenay SJ 38 7 13 20 0.53 20 10 -15
Wilson SJ 42 3 17 20 0.48 20 40 -28
T.Pederson SJ 43 7 13 20 0.47 20 31 -14
Lomakin PHI 48 8 12 20 0.42 20 34 14
Druce WIN 48 6 14 20 0.42 20 37 -5
Hannan BUF 53 5 15 20 0.38 20 41 10
Corriveau HAR 54 8 12 20 0.37 20 12 -20
Bourque NYR 54 6 14 20 0.37 20 39 -9
Hiller DET 60 8 12 20 0.33 20 109 6
Maltais TB 61 7 13 20 0.33 20 35 -19
Burt HAR 62 6 14 20 0.32 20 116 -14
Johansson CAL 75 4 16 20 0.27 20 60 11
Marchment CHI 76 5 15 20 0.26 20 309 13
Diduck VAN 78 6 14 20 0.26 20 163 29
Podein EDM 38 13 6 19 0.50 19 25 -1
Berehowsky TOR 40 4 15 19 0.48 19 61 1
Babych VAN 41 3 16 19 0.46 19 42 4
Audette BUF 42 12 7 19 0.45 19 51 -5
Chorske NJ 50 7 12 19 0.38 19 25 -1
Bassen STL 51 9 10 19 0.37 19 59 -4
Hatcher MIN 65 4 15 19 0.29 19 176 -26
Kucera CHI 70 5 14 19 0.27 19 59 7
Wilson STL 76 8 11 19 0.25 19 44 -7
Macoun TOR 76 4 15 19 0.25 19 55 3
King WIN 77 8 11 19 0.25 19 203 4
Beukeboom NYR 79 2 17 19 0.24 19 153 10
Carkner PHI 80 3 16 19 0.24 19 146 16
Neely BOS 12 11 7 18 1.50 18 25 4
Foligno TOR 54 13 5 18 0.33 18 84 1
Christian CHI 60 4 14 18 0.30 18 12 6
Errey BUF 61 9 9 18 0.30 18 80 1
Gavin MIN 63 10 8 18 0.29 18 59 -4
McLlwain TOR 65 14 4 18 0.28 18 30 -17
Daigneault MON 65 8 10 18 0.28 18 57 24
Ramage MON 74 5 13 18 0.24 18 146 -24
Smith EDM 76 4 14 18 0.24 18 30 -11
Paek PIT 76 3 15 18 0.24 18 64 15
Murphy CHI 17 7 10 17 1.00 17 18 -4
DiPietro MON 27 4 13 17 0.63 17 14 10
M.Pederson SJ 40 10 7 17 0.43 17 24 -20
Nattress PHI 44 7 10 17 0.39 17 29 1
Carbonneau MON 59 4 13 17 0.29 17 20 -8
Yawney CAL 61 1 16 17 0.28 17 65 5
Kasatonov NJ 63 3 14 17 0.27 17 55 7
Roberts BOS 64 5 12 17 0.27 17 103 22
MacDermid WAS 72 9 8 17 0.24 17 80 -13
Odjick VAN 74 4 13 17 0.23 17 360 4
Conacher LA 79 9 8 17 0.22 17 20 -15
Cavallini WAS 79 6 11 17 0.22 17 56 4
Erickson WIN 39 4 12 16 0.41 16 12 2
Straka PIT 41 3 13 16 0.39 16 29 3
Erixon NYR 42 5 11 16 0.38 16 10 13
Murphy BOS 48 5 11 16 0.33 16 60 -14
Ledyard BUF 48 2 14 16 0.33 16 43 0
Butsayev PHI 49 2 14 16 0.33 16 57 2
Ulanov WIN 54 2 14 16 0.30 16 122 6
Carter SJ 55 7 9 16 0.29 16 81 -25
Glynn EDM 62 4 12 16 0.26 16 58 -12
Boschman OTT 68 9 7 16 0.24 16 95 -27
Rumble OTT 68 3 13 16 0.24 16 61 -26
Stanton PIT 76 4 12 16 0.21 16 97 8
Murzyn VAN 77 5 11 16 0.21 16 179 36
Musil CAL 78 6 10 16 0.21 16 129 26
May WAS 80 6 10 16 0.20 16 266 0
Foote QUE 80 4 12 16 0.20 16 168 3
Odelein MON 81 2 14 16 0.20 16 201 35
Andersson NYR 29 4 11 15 0.52 15 16 7
Archibald OTT 42 9 6 15 0.36 15 32 -15
Taylor LA 46 6 9 15 0.33 15 49 2
Lowe NYR 47 3 12 15 0.32 15 58 -1
Domi WIN 59 5 10 15 0.25 15 340 1
McCrimmon DET 60 1 14 15 0.25 15 71 21
Konroyd DET 65 3 12 15 0.23 15 67 -15
Zombo STL 69 0 15 15 0.22 15 78 -4
Butcher STL 82 5 10 15 0.18 15 209 0
Zmolek SJ 83 5 10 15 0.18 15 229 -51
Fergus VAN 36 5 9 14 0.39 14 20 1
Skrudland CAL 38 7 7 14 0.37 14 65 4
Pantaleyev BOS 39 8 6 14 0.36 14 12 -6
Pearson QUE 41 13 1 14 0.34 14 95 3
C.J.Young BOS 43 7 7 14 0.33 14 32 -6
Smail OTT 51 4 10 14 0.27 14 51 -34
Hardy LA 53 1 13 14 0.26 14 89 -1
Broten NYR 58 5 9 14 0.24 14 48 -6
Barr NJ 60 6 8 14 0.23 14 44 3
Taglianetti PIT 71 2 12 14 0.20 14 182 15
Ewen MON 74 5 9 14 0.19 14 191 7
Bergevin TB 76 2 12 14 0.18 14 66 -16
Finn QUE 79 5 9 14 0.18 14 160 -4
Lefebvre TOR 79 2 12 14 0.18 14 90 6
M.Sullivan SJ 81 6 8 14 0.17 14 30 -42
Ojanen NJ 31 4 9 13 0.42 13 14 -2
Reekie TB 42 2 11 13 0.31 13 69 2
Lindsay QUE 44 4 9 13 0.30 13 16 0
Ramsey PIT 44 3 10 13 0.30 13 28 16
Valk VAN 46 6 7 13 0.28 13 73 5
Jelinek OTT 49 7 6 13 0.27 13 52 -21
Needham PIT 55 8 5 13 0.24 13 24 -2
Lowry STL 56 5 8 13 0.23 13 101 -18
Rychel LA 68 6 7 13 0.19 13 293 -14
McGill PHI 70 3 10 13 0.19 13 221 7
Stapleton PIT 78 4 9 13 0.17 13 10 -8
Richardson EDM 80 3 10 13 0.16 13 140 -18
Rouse TOR 80 3 10 13 0.16 13 128 8
Daneyko NJ 82 2 11 13 0.16 13 222 4
Ogrodnick DET 18 6 6 12 0.67 12 2 -3
S. King NYR 24 7 5 12 0.50 12 16 4
Joseph EDM 31 2 10 12 0.39 12 46 -6
Petit CAL 34 3 9 12 0.35 12 50 -6
Williams SJ 39 1 11 12 0.31 12 49 -25
B.Smith MIN 43 5 7 12 0.28 12 8 -6
Bozon STL 52 6 6 12 0.23 12 55 -1
Ronan MON 53 5 7 12 0.23 12 20 6
Dirk VAN 67 4 8 12 0.18 12 146 22
Hunter VAN 72 5 7 12 0.17 12 182 -5
Luongo OTT 74 3 9 12 0.16 12 68 -42
Berube CAL 75 4 8 12 0.16 12 209 -6
Wilson CAL 22 4 7 11 0.50 11 8 10
Vujtek EDM 28 1 10 11 0.39 11 8 -1
Konowalchuk WAS 36 4 7 11 0.31 11 16 4
Snuggerud PHI 39 4 7 11 0.28 11 14 -3
Murray CHI 49 4 7 11 0.22 11 57 -14
Donnelly BUF 58 3 8 11 0.19 11 219 6
Dahl CAL 59 2 9 11 0.19 11 52 9
Kasper TB 66 4 7 11 0.17 11 20 -16
More SJ 73 5 6 11 0.15 11 179 -35
Quintal STL 73 1 10 11 0.15 11 100 -6
Ludwig MIN 76 1 10 11 0.14 11 149 0
Muni CHI 79 0 11 11 0.14 11 73 -15
Lazaro OTT 26 6 4 10 0.38 10 16 -8
Norwood STL 32 3 7 10 0.31 10 63 -5
Featherstone BOS 34 5 5 10 0.29 10 102 6
Murphy OTT 42 3 7 10 0.24 10 28 -18
DeBrusk EDM 49 8 2 10 0.20 10 199 -14
Wells NYR 50 1 9 10 0.20 10 105 -2
Kimble BOS 54 7 3 10 0.19 10 177 4
Corkum BUF 67 6 4 10 0.15 10 38 -2
Dahlquist CAL 73 3 7 10 0.14 10 66 -2
Gordijuk BUF 16 3 6 9 0.56 9 0 4
Hurlbut NYR 23 1 8 9 0.39 9 16 4
Boivin PHI 30 5 4 9 0.30 9 76 -5
Moller BUF 35 2 7 9 0.26 9 83 6
Cunneyworth HAR 36 5 4 9 0.25 9 61 -1
Petrovicky HAR 42 3 6 9 0.21 9 45 -10
McRae STL 45 3 6 9 0.20 9 167 -13
Cirella NYR 52 3 6 9 0.17 9 83 4
Maley SJ 55 2 7 9 0.16 9 143 -27
Daniels PIT 57 5 4 9 0.16 9 14 -6
Hughes BOS 61 5 4 9 0.15 9 191 -5
Lalor WIN 62 1 8 9 0.15 9 74 -13
K.Samuelson PIT 63 3 6 9 0.14 9 106 25
McKenzie HAR 63 3 6 9 0.14 9 202 -9
Kocur NYR 64 3 6 9 0.14 9 129 -9
Loewen OTT 77 4 5 9 0.12 9 145 -25
Houlder BUF 13 3 5 8 0.62 8 6 7
T.Sweeney BOS 14 1 7 8 0.57 8 6 1
Douris BOS 18 4 4 8 0.44 8 4 5
Keczmer HAR 21 4 4 8 0.38 8 28 -2
Greig HAR 22 1 7 8 0.36 8 27 -11
Day HAR 24 1 7 8 0.33 8 47 -8
Werenka EDM 27 5 3 8 0.30 8 24 1
Tatarinov QUE 28 2 6 8 0.29 8 28 6
McDonough SJ 30 6 2 8 0.27 8 6 -21
Hill MON 30 2 6 8 0.27 8 47 -5
K.Brown CHI 31 2 6 8 0.26 8 37 4
Loiselle NYI 38 5 3 8 0.21 8 84 -4
Hudson EDM 39 1 7 8 0.21 8 44 -8
Hedican STL 40 0 8 8 0.20 8 30 -4
Roberge MON 48 4 4 8 0.17 8 140 3
Ahola SJ 49 3 5 8 0.16 8 36 -11
McIntyre NYR 57 3 5 8 0.14 8 82 -14
Anderson WAS 57 2 6 8 0.14 8 18 -1
Houda HAR 57 2 6 8 0.14 8 163 -21
Hartman TB 58 4 4 8 0.14 8 154 -7
Wilkinson SJ 58 1 7 8 0.14 8 96 -48
Hammond OTT 61 4 4 8 0.13 8 104 -40
Barrasso PIT 62 0 8 8 0.13 8 20 0
Kennedy WIN 77 1 7 8 0.10 8 105 -4
Eastwood TOR 12 1 6 7 0.58 7 21 -2
Quintin SJ 14 2 5 7 0.50 7 4 -4
R.Brown CHI 15 1 6 7 0.47 33 33 6
Godynyuk CAL 26 3 4 7 0.27 7 17 7
Rice EDM 26 2 5 7 0.27 7 13 -5
Murray BOS 27 3 4 7 0.26 7 8 -6
Wiemer BOS 27 1 6 7 0.26 7 48 -1
Berezan SJ 28 3 4 7 0.25 7 28 -18
Marois NYI 28 2 5 7 0.25 7 35 -3
Mallette NJ 34 4 3 7 0.21 7 56 3
Hynes PHI 36 3 4 7 0.19 7 16 -3
Gilhen TB 42 3 4 7 0.17 7 12 -13
Chase STL 49 2 5 7 0.14 7 204 -9
Vukota NYI 71 2 5 7 0.10 7 199 4
Zettler SJ 79 0 7 7 0.09 7 150 -48
Lafreniere TB 9 3 3 6 0.67 6 4 -5
Propp MIN 15 3 3 6 0.40 6 0 -8
Belanger MON 18 4 2 6 0.33 6 4 1
Kerr HAR 22 0 6 6 0.27 6 7 -11
Shuchuk LA 23 2 4 6 0.26 6 14 4
Bergland TB 25 3 3 6 0.24 6 11 -9
Vaske NYI 25 1 5 6 0.24 6 30 6
Carney BUF 29 2 4 6 0.21 6 51 2
Dinnen OTT 31 2 4 6 0.19 6 30 -19
Albelin NJ 34 1 5 6 0.18 6 14 -1
Patterson BUF 35 4 2 6 0.17 6 18 -2
Ladouceur HAR 59 2 4 6 0.10 6 107 -17
Russell CHI 66 2 4 6 0.09 6 151 5
Lang LA 11 0 5 5 0.45 5 2 -3
Lipuma TB 13 0 5 5 0.38 5 32 1
Brown NJ 15 0 5 5 0.33 5 2 3
Kozlov DET 16 4 1 5 0.31 5 14 -1
Savage WAS 16 2 3 5 0.31 5 12 -4
Bruce SJ 17 2 3 5 0.29 5 33 -14
Byers SJ 18 4 1 5 0.28 5 122 -2
Conroy PHI 18 3 2 5 0.28 5 17 0
Van Allen EDM 21 1 4 5 0.24 5 6 -2
Richer BOS 23 1 4 5 0.22 5 18 -9
Wolanin QUE 23 1 4 5 0.22 5 49 8
Leach HAR 24 3 2 5 0.21 5 4 -7
Prokhorov STL 26 4 1 5 0.19 5 15 -4
Kruse CAL 26 2 3 5 0.19 5 41 3
Richter NYR 35 0 5 5 0.14 5 2 0
Bawa SJ 41 5 0 5 0.12 5 47 -24
Osiecki MIN 42 1 4 5 0.12 5 19 -20
Matvichuk MIN 51 2 3 5 0.10 5 26 -7
Pedersen HAR 58 1 4 5 0.09 5 60 2
Jennings PIT 58 0 5 5 0.09 5 65 7
Essensa WIN 66 0 5 5 0.08 5 2 0
Ray BUF 68 3 2 5 0.07 5 211 -3
McKim BOS 7 1 3 4 0.57 4 0 2
Faust PHI 8 2 2 4 0.50 4 4 3
Smolinski BOS 8 1 3 4 0.50 4 0 3
Fogarty PIT 12 0 4 4 0.33 4 4 -3
Hervey TB 15 0 4 4 0.27 4 36 -4
Picard SJ 25 4 0 4 0.16 4 24 -17
Reese CAL 25 0 4 4 0.16 4 4 0
Romaniuk WIN 28 3 1 4 0.14 4 22 0
Thompson LA 28 0 4 4 0.14 4 79 -3
Pilon NYI 41 1 3 4 0.10 4 146 -3
Giles STL 48 0 4 4 0.08 4 40 -2
Baron STL 53 2 2 4 0.08 4 59 -5
Cheveldae DET 66 0 4 4 0.06 4 4 0
Hankinson NJ 4 2 1 3 0.75 3 9 2
McDougall EDM 4 2 1 3 0.75 3 4 2
Felsner STL 4 0 3 3 0.75 3 0 0
Ruff TB 8 2 1 3 0.38 3 8 -1
Petrov MON 9 2 1 3 0.33 3 10 2
Black MIN 10 2 1 3 0.30 3 4 0
Morris SJ 14 0 3 3 0.21 3 6 -11
Walter VAN 23 3 0 3 0.13 3 8 -2
Hrivnak WIN 29 0 3 3 0.10 3 0 0
Wakaluk MIN 29 0 3 3 0.10 3 20 0
Dufresne MON 30 1 2 3 0.10 3 30 0
Cronin PHI 34 2 1 3 0.09 3 37 0
Smyth CAL 34 1 2 3 0.09 3 95 3
Hrudey LA 48 0 3 3 0.06 3 8 0
Marsh OTT 57 0 3 3 0.05 3 30 -25
Casey MIN 58 0 3 3 0.05 3 28 0
Berry MIN 61 0 3 3 0.05 3 107 4
Ranford EDM 66 0 3 3 0.05 3 10 0
Belfour CHI 69 0 3 3 0.04 3 28 0
Rivers TB 4 0 2 2 0.50 2 2 -2
Forslund CAL 5 0 2 2 0.40 2 0 0
Capuano TB 6 1 1 2 0.33 2 2 -4
Djoos NYR 6 1 1 2 0.33 2 2 0
Cummins DET 7 1 1 2 0.29 2 58 0
Otevrel SJ 7 0 2 2 0.29 2 0 -6
Kolstad SJ 10 0 2 2 0.20 2 12 -9
Osborne TB 11 1 1 2 0.18 2 8 -1
Wood SJ 12 1 1 2 0.17 2 71 -5
Brickley WIN 12 0 2 2 0.17 2 2 0
Eakins WIN 14 0 2 2 0.14 2 38 2
Simon QUE 15 1 1 2 0.13 2 67 -2
Bennett CHI 16 0 2 2 0.13 2 8 -2
Gillis HAR 18 1 1 2 0.11 2 38 0
Carlyle WIN 22 1 1 2 0.09 2 14 -6
Nylund NYI 22 1 1 2 0.09 2 43 -2
Blue BOS 22 0 2 2 0.09 2 6 0
Watters LA 22 0 2 2 0.09 2 18 -3
Woolley WAS 23 0 2 2 0.09 2 10 0
Whitmore VAN 29 0 2 2 0.07 2 2 0
Stauber LA 30 0 2 2 0.07 2 2 0
W.Young TB 31 0 2 2 0.06 2 2 0
Roussel PHI 32 0 2 2 0.06 2 11 0
Twist QUE 34 0 2 2 0.06 2 64 0
Fiset QUE 37 0 2 2 0.05 2 2 0
Jablonski TB 42 0 2 2 0.05 2 7 0
Soderstrom PHI 43 0 2 2 0.05 2 4 0
Healy NYI 46 0 2 2 0.04 2 2 0
Burke HAR 50 0 2 2 0.04 2 25 0
Hextall QUE 53 0 2 2 0.04 2 56 0
Roy MON 61 0 2 2 0.03 2 16 0
Vernon CAL 63 0 2 2 0.03 2 42 0
Joseph STL 66 0 2 2 0.03 2 8 0
Brown PHI 67 0 2 2 0.03 2 76 -5
Grimson CHI 76 1 1 2 0.03 2 186 2
Barnaby BUF 1 1 0 1 1.00 1 0 0
Ratushny VAN 1 0 1 1 1.00 1 0 0
Zholtok BOS 1 0 1 1 1.00 1 0 1
Sullivan NJ 2 0 1 1 0.50 1 0 -1
Duncanson NYR 3 0 1 1 0.33 1 0 0
Beaufait SJ 4 1 0 1 0.25 1 0 -1
Bowen PHI 4 1 0 1 0.25 1 2 0
MacDonald BUF 4 1 0 1 0.25 1 2 0
Esau QUE 4 0 1 1 0.25 1 2 1
D.Smith MIN 9 0 1 1 0.11 1 2 -2
Vial DET 9 0 1 1 0.11 1 20 1
Brown BUF 10 0 1 1 0.10 1 6 -5
Draper BUF 11 0 1 1 0.09 1 2 0
Karpa QUE 11 0 1 1 0.09 1 13 -6
Tichy CHI 13 0 1 1 0.08 1 30 7
Gosselin HAR 15 0 1 1 0.07 1 2 0
Fortier LA 16 0 1 1 0.06 1 11 -9
Hayward SJ 18 0 1 1 0.06 1 2 0
McGill TOR 19 1 0 1 0.05 1 34 5
Bergeron TB 19 0 1 1 0.05 1 0 0
Potvin LA 19 0 1 1 0.05 1 52 -9
Berthiaume OTT 23 0 1 1 0.04 1 2 0
Racicot MON 25 0 1 1 0.04 1 6 0
Wregget PIT 25 0 1 1 0.04 1 6 0
Ciccone MIN 29 0 1 1 0.03 1 106 3
Puppa TOR 32 0 1 1 0.03 1 0 0
Hackett SJ 36 0 1 1 0.03 1 4 0
Fitzpatrick NYI 37 0 1 1 0.03 1 2 0
Billington NJ 40 0 1 1 0.03 1 8 0
Potvin TOR 46 0 1 1 0.02 1 4 0
Vanbiesbrouk NYR 48 0 1 1 0.02 1 18 0
McLean VAN 54 0 1 1 0.02 1 16 0
Moog BOS 54 0 1 1 0.02 1 14 0
Beaupre WAS 57 0 1 1 0.02 1 20 0
Baumgartner TOR 61 1 0 1 0.02 1 155 -11
Bales BOS 1 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Burridge WAS 1 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Chabot MON 1 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
D'Alessio HAR 1 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Littman TB 1 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Parks NYI 1 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Semchuk LA 1 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 0
St. Amour OTT 1 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 0
Cimellaro OTT 2 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 -2
Cote TB 2 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 -1
Marcinyshyn NYR 2 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 -1
O'Neill WIN 2 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Raglan TB 2 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 0
Williams LA 2 0 0 0 0.00 0 10 0
Charron MON 3 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 0
Ciavaglia BUF 3 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Cloutier QUE 3 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Hamr OTT 3 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 -3
Wamsley TOR 3 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Hirsch NYR 4 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
O'Connor NJ 7 0 0 0 0.00 0 9 -4
J.Messier NYR 9 0 0 0 0.00 0 6 0
Knickle LA 10 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 0
Chapdelaine LA 13 0 0 0 0.00 0 12 -6
Shannon TOR 15 0 0 0 0.00 0 11 -2
Agnew HAR 16 0 0 0 0.00 0 68 3
Waite CHI 20 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Langway WAS 21 0 0 0 0.00 0 20 -13
Riendeau DET 22 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 0
Hebert STL 23 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 0
Tabaracci WAS 23 0 0 0 0.00 0 12 0
Tugnutt EDM 25 0 0 0 0.00 0 2 0
Caufield PIT 26 0 0 0 0.00 0 60 -1
Hasek BUF 27 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Pietrangelo HAR 30 0 0 0 0.00 0 4 0
Irbe SJ 35 0 0 0 0.00 0 10 0
Terreri NJ 47 0 0 0 0.00 0 6 0
Fuhr BUF 56 0 0 0 0.00 0 10 0
Sidorkiewicz OTT 63 0 0 0 0.00 0 8 0
-- | rec.sport.hockey |
1st round:
----------
PITT vs NYI: PITT in 4.
It looks like a safe bet. NYI has been bagging it of late.
NYI and NJD have a showdown Friday night for the honour
of Pittsburg anyway. Pigsburg in 4.
WASH vs NJD: WASH in 6.
I think that NJD have a solid team and will compete with
WASH. I agree though with WASH in 6.
BOS vs BUF: BOS in 5.
The B's have been playing awesome hockey in the last
two weeks. The only question is how long will it last?
Fuhr is a dud. BOS in 4.
QUE vs MON: MON in 7.
It seems to me that MON is much like the VAN - no chemistry.
The Habs seem to be not in stride. QUE in 5.
CHI vs STL: CHI in 4.
STL should not be in the playoffs. CHI in 4.
DET vs TOR: DET in 6.
I am a diehard Leaf fan but ... It seems that the Leafs
offense is shutting down in the last week. Can they
turn it around against Detroit. As I recall, the last
couple of time these two teams met, the Leafs were pummelled.
I don't know if Bobbie is allowed in Canada yet. If he is,
DET in 5. If not, DET in 6.
VAN vs WIN: WIN in 6.
Upset in the making here. Another team with bad chemistry.
There is something gone foul among Linden, Momesso and Bure.
WIN in 6.
CAL vs LA: CAL in 5.
Anybody that says that LA could possibly beet CAL does
not watch the Smythe a whole lot. LA is a bunch of Geritols.
CAL in 4.
2nd round:
----------
PITT vs WASH: PITT in 4.
It seems to me that Pigsburg has some egos on their team. Their
saving grace though is Bowman. He can put anybody in their place.
However, if PIGS have a quick first round, they may be a little
too high. WASH could be there for a surprise. Having said that,
I will say PITT in 6.
BOS vs MON: BOS in 6.
MON will not be there. BOS is surprising me of late. Cam is great.
The couple of wins against QUE last week have sold me with the
B's. B's in 6.
CHI vs DET: CHI in 7.
Yikes. This will not be pretty. But DET is running like a machine
of late. They've had a non-busy end of the season in which they played
like killers. DET in 6.
WIN vs CAL: CAL in 5.
CAL has a solid team, a little weak in the nets. CAL will out
muscle WIN. CAL in 5.
3rd round:
----------
PITT vs BOS: PITT in 5.
I hate PITT. My logic eludes me. The dark side will take over
and give BOS the extra push it needs to dump PITT. There may
be something to this - if you think of the rivalry. BOS in 7.
CHI vs CAL: CHI in 5.
Finals:
------
PITT vs CHI: PITT in 5.
NO, no, no. We have BOS vs DET. I don't know what to say
here. Both teams will be flying and overdue. I will go
with goaltending and muscle and say DET in 7.
| rec.sport.hockey |
But waiiiiiit, isn't Nissan officially registering the car as far as
government paperwork goes, Nissan Stanza Altima, to avoid costly and
lengthy paperwork? I read this on the net a while ago, and someone
actually may have said there's a little Stanza logo on the Altima
somewhere.
You *can* have it both ways :-)
Spiros | rec.autos |
With the kind of team Montreal has now, they can take the
cup easily. The only problem they have right now is that everyone is
trying to steal the show and play alone. They need some massive teamwork.
They are also in a little of a slump because long-time hockey
Montreal Canadiens announcer Claude Mouton died last tuesday and it was
rough on everybody because he has worked with the organization for 21
years. But I know that is no excuse. But if the Habs manage to get some
good teamwork and get into the spirit, they should have no problem
winning in May. | rec.sport.hockey |
What about U. Johnny Hodapp, the greatest 2nd baseman in Cleveland Indians
history? 225 hits in 1930, consistantly over .300. A great, great second baseman.
| rec.sport.baseball |
I just noticed that my halogen table lamp runs off 12 Volts.
The big thinngy that plugs into the wall says 12 Volts DC, 20mA
The question is: Can I trickle charge the battery on my CB650
with it?
I don't know the rating of the battery, but it is a factory
intalled one.
Thanks,
Sanjay
--
'81 CB650 DoD #1224 | rec.motorcycles |
My friend, David Gordon wants to sell his 1989 Honda. Some of the details of th
e car are as follows:
Five speed
A/c, AM/FM/Cassette stereo
ps/pb
Rear window defroster
EXCELLENT CONDITION
Asking 6400.00 OBO. | rec.autos |
Don't just nab it, POUNCE on it. These are fairly rare bikes, and
they are MORE than adequate for putting a big brown stripe in your shorts.
Does a 50mph power wheelie appeal to you? I thought it would...
Only really bad things: the stock clutch isn't up to the task.
Barnett can take care of this. The back tire wears quickly (gee, wonder why?),
and the induction system is a bear to work on.
Later, | rec.motorcycles |
: >DUCATI3.UUE
: >QUUNCD Ver. 1.4, by Theodore A. Kaldis.
: >BEGIN--cut here--CUT HERE--Part 3
: >MG@NH)C1M+AV4)I;^**3NYR7,*(.H&"3V'!X12(&E+AFKIN0@APYT;C[#LI2T
This GIF was GREAT!! I have it as the backdrop on my Apollo thingy and many
people stop by and admire it. Of course I tell them that I did it myself....
It's far too much trouble to contact archive sites to get stuff like this, so
if anybody else has any good GIFs, please, please don't hesitate to post them.
Is the bra thing still going?
--
Nick (the Idiot Biker) DoD 1069 Concise Oxford No Bras
M'Lud. | rec.motorcycles |
I have owned my Sprint from the beginning and that sensor light comes on every
30K to let you know it's time for a check up. When that light goes on, I just
take it to the delaer tell them "It's that time" and they work on it for 4 hou
and you pay $5 for parts and $100 for labor. (Ahh...what they get for labor)
I currently have about 95K on my Sprint and of all the times I took it in for
service, I never say on the payment sheet anything about the replacement of the
Oxygen sensor. What the heck is an Oxygen sensor? As far an I know of, I have
never had that thing replaced in my car and the car is purring like a kitten.
Now, I don't have a/c (Mother Nature does that for me :-) ) and that might have
something to do with it, but I still never heard of an Oxygen sensor. The only
MAJOR service job I have had on my car (besides getting the tires replaced
if you want to call that a service job) was getting the Rotor, Distributor and
Gasket replaced. And that was all done within the past 2 months.
What I do at 30K is have a good tune-up, let them replace what ever they need
to, pay the bill (about $125) and go home and don't worry about the car for
another 30K. Oh, I just remembered something. If that little sensor light
bothers you, in the fuse box right below the turn-signal lever up against
the dash, there is a swith on the right side. Flip that switch and the light
will go off. I do that so that little light won't annoy me. If you can't
find it, look it up in the car manuel. I hope that I have helped a little
and good luck with the _Oxygen sensor_?
- Thomas - | rec.autos |
in europe you can buy a 525iX, with computer controlled diffs rather
than the horrid viscous coupled ones of the outgoing 325iX. | rec.autos |
The New York talk shows are just awful in this regard. People are constantly
calling WFAN and WABC with (stuff like) "I was thinking, why don't the Yankees
trade Kaminicki and Silvestri to Seattle for Ken Griffey Jr and Randy Johnson,
that would really help the team" or "Do you think the Yankees can get Roger
Clemens?". The show hosts are pretty good about handling these guys, but it's
still annoying.
The best one was at the end of one show, a caller started out with "I was
thinking, why don't the Yankees trade for..." and then the host hung up on
him. I cheered! | rec.sport.baseball |
Insurance companies sure seem to go for No-Fault coverage. Since the
majority of accidents are the cagers' fault, doesn't this imply that we
would have to pay much higher rates under a No-Fault system?
With a cars-only system, it seems to make sense on the surface: take the
legal costs out of the system. But it looks like motorcyclists would
get screwed.
--
Michael "Chuck" Bain meb4593@icdfs.ca.boeing.com | rec.motorcycles |
An effort was made to remove the sticker. It came to pieces, leaving
most of it firmly attached to the window. It was dark, and around
10:00 pm. The sticker (before being mangled in an ineffective attempt
to be torn off) warned the car would be towed if not removed. A
"reasonable person" would arguably have driven the car. Had an
accident occured, I don't think my friend's attorney would have much
trouble fixing blame on the apartment mangement.
As a practical matter, even without a conviction, the cost and
inconvenience of defending against the suit would be considerable.
As a moral matter, it was a pretty fucking stupid thing to do for so
paltry a violation as parking without an authorization sticker (BTW, it
wasn't "somebody's" spot, it was resident-only, but unassigned,
parking).
| rec.motorcycles |
Why not? Brooks Robinson is a defensive liability too, and Ted
Williams is a weak hitter. Even great players decline as they age. | rec.sport.baseball |
Let's start over. I'm not arguing about who is the better goaltender. I'd
take Soderstrom right now. What I am saying is that Roussel can be a #1
netminder. The GAA difference is less than half a goal per game (less than
that after last night), their save percentages are close, and their records
are similar. And with that, I just don't see how you can label Roussel as
the most disappointing player on the Flyers this season.
You say Soderstrom played against better competition. That may very well
be, but there is no way of knowing how Roussel would have performed in
those games. Besides, against the better scoring teams like Pittsburgh,
the defense is more keyed up than they are against San Jose.
But I'm not just judging Roussel on that game alone. I've seen him play
for the past two seasons in Philly and before that in Hershey. It's just
my opinion, but I think he's got what it takes. Of course, I thought that
about Mark LaForest, too. But I never did about Wendell Young. So I'm
batting .500 in judging Hershey talent since the Hextall-era.
As for the Rangers game, you can say he was saved by a mistake by the
offensive player if you like. But Rou had his leg in position to make the
save. If he didn't, it wouldn't have mattered if the Rangers player didn't
get the puck up or not. It would have been a goal. On a breakaway that's
what the goalie wants to do, take away as much as possible and force the
shooter to beat him.
I seem to remember Roussel doing an excellent job against Pittsurgh on
opening night to give the Flyers a tie against the two-time defending
champs. And not to take anything away from Soderstrom because he was
senational in that game agains the Habs. But you can't tell me that a
Montreal player had an open net to shoot at some point during that game
and just flat out missed it. Mistakes, both on offense and defense are
part of the game. Or there'd never be shutouts.
Anyway, I'm happy the Flyers have both Soderstrom and Roussel and
I'm not going to argue about it anymore. Besides, with the current
7-game winning streak and expectations soaring for next year, I
don't want to piss you off to the point that you don't sell me any
tickets next season:-). | rec.sport.hockey |
With everyone bitching about the hockey coverage by ESPN its almost like the
Detroit-Toronto game was not televised last nite. I was just thankful to see
hockey on a night that it wasn't supposed to be carried. Thanks to ESPN, no
matter why they televised the game | rec.sport.hockey |
I have been looking at buying a 1989 Jeep Laredo and was wondering
if anyone had any bad or good experiences with this model. Is it
all that much different than the other YJs?
It looks, feels and sounds like a nice vehicle even thought the
price is rather steep for an '89 (12K Canadian).
| rec.autos |
This morning a truck that had been within my sight (and I within
his) for about 3 miles suddenly forgot that I existed and pulled
over right on me -- my front wheel was about even with the back
edge of his front passenger door as I was accelerating past him.
It was trivial enough for me to tap the brakes and slide behind him
as he slewed over (with no signal, of course) on top of me, with
my little horn blaring (damn, I need Fiamms!), but the satisfaction
of being aware of my surroundings and thus surviving was not enough,
especially when I later pulled up alongside the bastard and he made
no apologetic wave or anything.
Is there some way that I can memorize the license plate of an
offending vehicle and get the name and address of the owner?
I'm not going to firebomb houses or anything, I'd just like to
write a consciousness-raising letter or two. I think that it would
be good for BDI cagers to know that We Know Where They Live.
Maybe they'd use 4 or 5 brain cells while driving instead of the
usual 3. | rec.motorcycles |
Well, DRL's are already mandatory for motorcycles...
| rec.autos |
I was wondering if anyone had any kind of Fenway Park gif.
I would appreciate it if someone could send me one.
Thanks in advance. | rec.sport.baseball |
: >Every single piece of evidence we can find points to Major League Baseball
: >being 50% offense, 50% defense. A run scored is just as important as a run
: >prevented.
: >
: This certainly passes the "common sense test" for me, but is there any
: statistical evidence to say what percent of defense is pitching and what
: percent is fielding? I'd really like to know. BTW, Sherri, thanks for
: the DA data I find it fascinating.
One of the chapters in Palmer and Thorn's 'Hidden Game' is titled
'Pitching is 44% of Baseball,' implying that fielding is 6%. How do
they determine that? Beats me -- it's been a long, long time since I
read it.
One also has to separate offense into batting and baserunning, with the
split probably somewhere around 49.5% and 0.5%.
-- | rec.sport.baseball |
Yup! Ruins your sex life!
Tony
| rec.motorcycles |
Well, the Patrick Division got a little more interesting last night.
The Islanders lost in OT and the Devils tied the Pens. That means if the Isles
beat the Devils on Friday, the will meet the Caps in the playoffs.
However, I have some more comments on the Islanders and hockey in
general that I need to get off my chest :). First of all, with the Islanders
back-to-back lackluster performances against the Whalers, one may think that
the Islanders are out of shape. These guys always suck wind in the 2nd period,
come on a little in the 3rd and run out of gas too soon. It is unbelieveable
how many one goal games these guys have lost. Anyway, the games was pretty
wide open. The Isles still have tons of trouble scoring. The Whalers played
a golie in is 1st NHL start, I think his name was Lenarduzzi (sp?). (His NHL
debut was the Tuesday tie against the Isles). Like I mentioned before, this
guy looked like the best golie on the planet for a while (until he misplayed a
Mahlakov slap shot to go to OT). I say it's because the Isles don't shoot
correctly. Has anyone else noticed this?
Also, I think it is really a shame for hockey when I guy like Mick
Vukota gets as much ice time as he does. This guy has about as much hockey
talent as Jiggs MacDonald (who did play hockey, I think). Anytime he gets the
puck it gets stolen, and he always starts fights and gets needless penalties.
Richard Pilon is another guy who is on the ice to stir up crap. And he's a
defenseman. He's got to be approaching negative infinity for his plus/minus.
This guy gets beaten all the time. Why the need for such "enforcers"? Not
only do fights slow the game down ALOT, but it takes away from the guys who are
really trying to play the game. I'll be one of the few to admit, I do enjoy a
good fight once in a while, but only when it's "called for". You know, when a
guy checks the goalie too hard. In other words, a violation of "hockey ethics"
might cause you to get puched. But there is no need to start crap when you are
losing or becuase you can get away with it!! Does anyone agree that referees
need to be a little less lenient in the 3rd and OT? I mean COME ON already.
I'm sick of seeing teams pulling guys down, holding guys etc. just becuase the
referee doesn't call it. OT and late in the 3rd should be a time for strategy,
not physical prowess. Trying to set up a goal should be first and foremost.
If you are so afraid that the other team is going to score that you have to
pull a guy down to prevent it, you don't deserve to win in the first place.
Just My Honest Opinion, | rec.sport.hockey |
From where I come from in Canada, Borshevsky sounds more Canadian than
Smith! -)
Anyways, crawl back into the hole you crawled out of...the NBA doesn't
care where they get basketball players from, major league baseball
doesn't give a damn where they get baseball players from (except Cuba,
that is).
Canada is in no imminent danger of being overtaken as the primary
supplier of players...Sweden, Finland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia
are all relatively small countries, and cannot really produce players
at a greater rate than they are already producing them, and the
potential influx from the former Soviet Union is severely blunted
because the system has been raided and is starved for finances and
will take a decade or two, to recover and become a real threat, and
the US will just maintain its slow increase. Canada should continue
to supply 60% plus of the top hockey players in the world for the
forseeable future.
Besides we need the European hockey market if hockey is to take
its rightful place besides soccer as the two predominant world
sports...and since soccer is essentially boring, unlike hockey.
Canadians are under no threat...the European numbers will soon saturate,
if they haven't already...and by the time Russia comes online again,
the NHL should be a world league, and there will be many more teams
to stock and many more jobs for Canadian hockey players. In the near
team, the percentage of Canadians will mostly decline because of
Americans, not because of Europeans.
Crawl into a hole and die...
| rec.sport.hockey |
just to satiate my curiosity, why would this make you the stupid one? It seems
to me, everybody SHOULD be aware enough of what is going on. You do not need
to calculate the future position. You need to look at your mirrors a little
more. If you glance around, you will be able to tell how much faster than you
the car is going. Maybe not precisely, but well enough to know if you should
let him around before you try to pass. I know what you are talking about,
about the other driver being startled, because i myself have been startled
by drivers cruising by at around 90-100mph when i'm doin 55-65. The problem,
though, as i saw it, was not their fault for barreling around me, but my fault
for not paying the attention to my task-at-hand that i should have been.
Oddly enough, since the 2nd time(happened 2x in around 4 mo. when i'd had my
liscence for around 6 mo), i haven't been startled..and i've been passed by
cars doing roughly twice the speed of my car. Another odd occurance is the
fact that this only seems to happen on LONG trips...and if i drive along with
them, it doesn't happen at all :-) even on the long trips! :-) (adrenaline
will do that to you...i've had bad cop experiences with speeding, so anything
over the limit is adrenalizing for me...scared i'll get caught :-) Maybe
they should raise the limit, so we can pay better attention.....
just curious, and my .otwo | rec.autos |
My favorite was the Barry Foote homer that bounced on Waveland and through
a second floor window across the street. Second though, would be the Kong
drive that was last seen bouncing down the street that dead ends to the
park at Waveland. | rec.sport.baseball |
To Mr. Millitello -
Listen, Sammy, can you explain why Buck pitched you in relief
yesterday? I figure no-one would know this better than you yourself.
Jason A. Miller
"some doctor guy" | rec.sport.baseball |
being a mere female, I have often found I can't really take the big offensive line with asshole car drivers, so I found a more subtle and nastly
ooops I mean nasty way to get back at them. If somebody cuts you up, just wait till they have pulled out past you, and then gently lean over and
bend their aerial, every time I have done that it has eventually snapped
off near the base - which tends to go undetected for a while and is a bummer to replace.
| rec.motorcycles |
I recently bought a pack of prospect hockey cards which had various
players that were coming into the NHL. I got this particular card of
a Russian named Viktor Kozlov. It says "many scouts believe he will
be the #1 pick in 1993". Another guy is quoted as saying "He's as
good as Mario Lemieux". Anyone know who this guy is????? | rec.sport.hockey |
I was playing this golf game and something interesting happened.
On the 7th hole, I drove the ball down the fairway, when the ball was
in mid-flight, the game completely froze. A couple seconds later, the
screen went completely black, with an error message in large "Bubble"
letters that said DIVISION BY ZERO. I thought it was funny considering
I am a computer programmer, and I had never seen an error like this on
an actual video game system like Sega or Nintendo (or even Atari or
Intellevision years ago). Oh yeah, after the message, there was also
what must have been an address, in hexadecimal. I forget the exact hex
code that was given. HAS THIS HAPPENED TO ANYONE ELSE??? It must have,
my game shouldn't have been the only one to do this. | rec.sport.hockey |
From article <1qkkl5INNbvo@hp-col.col.hp.com>, by theckel@col.hp.com (Tim Heckel):
--When I was selling Nissans last summer, I sold a '92 SE-R in early August
when its supply was getting quite scarce. The car was black with ABS,
Value Option Pkg, and power moonroof. I sold it for $12,900 plus tax.
Naturally, my manager didn't really care to sell one of the most desirable
SE-R's for virtually no profit (to the best of my knowledge).....
--Aamir Qazi
-- | rec.autos |
Could be due to the rear-end ratio also.
Usually automatics have different rear-ends than manuals, from
my limited experience anyways.
David
| rec.autos |
MK48T02 from thomsom. It has a timekeeper (clock) and 512 bytes of NVRAM which
has a lithium battery backup. The battery has a life of ~10 years of poweroff
operation. Installed in a car it could be left powered on continuously and not
draw much current. The battery would only be used when your auto battery was
dead or had been removed.
In California they have a line on the transfer of ownership form which states
that the odometer mileage is correct. If incorrect you are required to
fill in what you know (or guesstimate) to be the correct mileage. If you
lie on this form and are caught you can be prosecuted and the buyer can
sue you for the value of the mileage differential. | rec.autos |
They light the highways in Texas? Funny, everywhere else I've been
they only light 'em at junctions.
I won't even get into how much road markings vary between states and
localities except to say that there are some areas where markings are
essentially nonexistant.
I suspect you have very limited experience -- US freeways vary
dramatically, particularly between states. I can name a number of
interstate highways in various parts of the country where 130 would be
very optimistic in any car.
I'm not sure what you call "quite severe" in terms of road deviations
but I suspect every single bridge junction on I84 through CT would be
considered so. They're hard to take at 85mph. That's not the only
interstate I've seen with such deviations, but it's one I drive
frequently.
Texas is pretty much an edge-case -- you can't assume that everywhere
has roads in such good condition, such flat terrain, and such
wide-open spaces. It just ain't so. | rec.autos |
Rumor has it that a guy at Dell Computer had his Miata totalled, so that would
be about $10k.
-- | rec.autos |
Sandberg is not particulary known for his stolen bases. What competition did
Alomar have? Sandberg came in a year after Ripken, and the same year as Boggs,
Gwynn, and the other magicians. So less attention was given to Sandberg.
Alomar is the only one in his class to be worth a mediocre. Besides the
numbers don't count. National league pitchers are much better pitchers.
Larry on someone elses account
-- | rec.sport.baseball |
^^^^^^^
Ooops...that should read Selke...forgive me for my insolence.
congenially, as always,
jd
--
James David
j3david@student.business.uwo.ca | rec.sport.hockey |
[... stuff deleted ...]
I have to agree here. As I heard on TSN tonight, "You want to pick
someone else, but you just don't see how you can". And I'm a Bruins
fan. Maybe this year will be different, but it doesn't look good.
Time will tell, though.
[... lots more deleted ...]
Randy | rec.sport.hockey |
Jonathan E. Quist, on the Thu, 15 Apr 1993 14:26:42 GMT wibbled:
: [lots of things, none of which are quoted here]
: >>> You think your *average* dirt biker can jump
: >>>a 3 foot log?
: >
: >How about an 18" log that is suspended about 18" off of the ground?
: >For that matter, how about a 4" log that is suspended 2.5' off of the
: >ground?
: Oh, ye of little imagination.
:You don't jump over those -that's where you lay the bike down and slide under!
: --
: Jonathan E. Quist
The nice thing about horses though, is that if they break down in the middle of
nowhere, you can eat them. Fuel's a bit cheaper, too.
--
Nick (the 90 HP Biker) DoD 1069 Concise Oxford Giddy-Up!
M'Lud. | rec.motorcycles |
: kevinh, on the Tue, 20 Apr 1993 13:23:01 GMT wibbled:
Jonathan Quist bemoaned:
: : |> Yes, it's a minor blasphemy that U.S. companies would ?? on the likes
of A.M.,
: : |> Jaguar, or (sob) Lotus. It's outright sacrilege for RR to have
non-British
: : |> ownership. It's a fundamental thing
Lotus looks set for a management buyout. GM weren't happy that the Elan was
late and too pricey. If they can write off the Elan development costs the may
be able to sell them for a sensible price.
: : I think there is a legal clause in the RR name, regardless of who owns it
: : it must be a British company/owner - i.e. BA can sell the company but not
: : the name.
: : kevinh@hasler.ascom.ch
: I don't believe that BA have anything to do with RR. It's a seperate
: company from the RR Aero-Engine company.
It's Vickers who own Rolls Royce cars.
And yes Kevin it is posts, Morgan use a sliding pillar front suspension.
Ob Bike (at long bleeding last): When will that Pettefar bloke get a mail
address so we can bung him on the Ogri list?
dave | rec.motorcycles |
I am interested in finding out how the 4Runner and Pathfinder have
been updated in the past few years. Like new engine, suspension and
the like. I noticed that the 1993 and 1992 4Runners are identical,
for example, and was looking into buying a used one.
Any info would be appreciated, esp. models/years to check out or
avoid. | rec.autos |
If you are interested in receiving the final player stats for
the 1992-1993 NHL Season as well as playoff box scores, stats and
scores/updates...
then e-mail my stat server
mmilitzo@skidmore.edu | rec.sport.hockey |
Splitfires work mainly by providing a more-or-less unshrouded spark to the
combustion chamber. If an engine's cylinder head design can benefit from this,
then the splitfires will yield a slight performance increase, most noticeably
in lower rpm range torque. Splitfires didn't do diddly-squat for my 1992 GMC
pickup (4.3l V6) but do give a noticeable performance boost in my 1991 Harley
Sportster 1200 and my best friend's 1986 Sportster 883. Folks I know who've
tried them in 1340 Evo motors can't tell any performance boost over plain
plugs (which is interesting since the XLH and big twin EVO combustion chambers
are pretty much the same shape, just different sizes). Two of my friends who
have shovelhead Harleys swear by the splitfires but if I had a shovelhead,
I'd dual-plug it instead since they respond well enough to dual plugs to make
the machine work and extra ignition system worth the expense (plus they look
really cool with a spark plug on each side of each head) | rec.motorcycles |
Ah, we are looking for good people just like you. We are a very concerned
group of citizens who are absolutely disgusted at the way that the majority
of drivers simply disobey traffic rules like going above the speed limit,
passing on our right, and riding our tails, while all the while we respectfully
abide by the rules of this great country and maintain the mandated speed
limits with our calibrated, certified cruise controls, while keeping the
respectful 1.5 car length distance/10 mph speed. How many times have you been
ticked off by some moron who jumps ahead in the (5.5 * 1.5)8.25 car lengths
that you have left between you and the vehicle ahead of you while driving
55 mph? Finally you have an option. We are a totally member supported group
that perform functions for our own good, for the good of this great country but MOST of all for those unfortunate ones that are too stupid to realize it,
bless their souls. For a paltry $10, you can join Citizens for Rationally
Advanced Piloting(C.R.A.P), a non-profit, members only, society. But, but,but,
there is a slight hitch, the initiation rite. To be a full fledged member of
this exclusive club, you must proof that you are able to be in the fast lane of
the busiest interstate in your area, keep the correct 1.5 car lenth/10 mph speedand I know this can be difficult with those morons around, NOT let anybody pass
you, not in the next lane, not in the slow lane, not in the breakdown lane,
not NOWHERE. For a complete list of acceptable interstates and times, send $5.
And by the way, over 90% of our members are highly regarded attorneys in the
auto field and they are completely, absolutely positively in the business ONLY
to serve your best interests. As a testament to their virtues, they will give
members 90% off the initial consultation fee. Feel free to drop me a line at
your earliest convenience and remember, only SPEED kills! | rec.autos |
mark andy (living in pittsburgh) bought his RZ350 from a dude in
massachusetts (or was it connecticut?). | rec.motorcycles |
Anyone have any opinions on fairly recent model Alfa Spiders ( 86-> )
Reliablilty for what their class ( I'm not talking Alfa vs. Toyota corrola
which is more relaible )
As far as I can discern, in recent years, there are 3 levels with all
basically the same mechanical aspects.
Please email any responses
| rec.autos |
Actually, what I think has become more evident, is that you are determined to
flaunt your ignorance at all cost. Jagr did not have a better season than
Francis ... to suggest otherwise is an insult to those with a modicum of
hockey knowledge. Save your almost maniacal devotion to the almighty
plus/minus ... it is the most misleading hockey stat available.
Until the NHL publishes a more useful quantifiable statistic including ice
time per game and some measure of its "quality" (i.e., is the player put out
in key situations like protecting a lead late in the game; is he matched up
against the other team's top one or two lines; short-handed, etc), I would
much rather see the +/- disappear altogether instead of having its dubious
merits trumpeted by those with little understanding of its implications.
Brad
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brad K. Gibson INTERNET: gibson@geop.ubc.ca
Dept. of Geophysics & Astronomy
#129-2219 Main Mall PHONE: (604)822-6722
University of British Columbia FAX: (604)822-6047
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
V6T 1Z4 | rec.sport.hockey |
You might want to clarify the 11 game winning streak. That Pens streak
is a PLAYOFF streak (tied by the Chicago Blackhawks, who had won 11 in a row
until they met the Pens in the finals last year) The 18 game unbeaten, so far,
is a regular season unbeaten streak. But hey, don't take it personally. I'm a
Flyers fan and two in a row is a stretch. But with a healthy Lindros, Recchi,
Brind'amour and Tommy Soderstrom, they'll be there next year!
By the way, since the Flyers need defenseman, what kind of trade would
anybody suggest from the existing Flyers roster since the scuttlebutt is that
Terry Carkner won't be there next year and apart from him a piece of notebook
paper would be better defense. | rec.sport.hockey |
We have one here, at Berg's alma mater (class of 1923). It's kind of
a sour thing; she disapproved of the job that Sewell et al had done.
| rec.sport.baseball |
Again, from my alcohol server's class:
The absolute *most* that eating before drinking can do is slow the absorption
down by 15 minutes. That gives me time to eat, slam one beer, and ride like
hell to try to make it home in the 10 minutes left after paying, donning
helmet & gloves, starting bike...
| rec.motorcycles |
People get a life !!!!!!!!!! | rec.autos |
rec.sport.hockey |
|
Well, after suffering from an intense fit of Minnesota-induced cabin fever,
I've decided to road trip to Milwaukee and take in a couple of games this
weekend. A couple games at County stadium will be great to relieve tension,
but I thought "Why not go to Wrigley for a game too?"
I see the Cubs are playing the Phillies on Sat (2:05 start, I believe
that's Eastern time listed). I figured it would be fun to bounce down to
Wrigley for the day game and live it up a little. I'm wondering if anyone
(esp. Cubbie fans) have some advice on:
1) If I'm taking 41 (Skokie Hwy) south until it runs into 94, what's the
best way to get to Wrigley? I'm planning on getting there an hour or
two early and paying through the nose for parking to keep things easy.
2) Is it probable that I'll be able to walk up and get bleacher seats (2 or
3) on game day? I figure since it's early in the year, Ryno's out and
the weather isn't great I should be able to get tickets. If not, what's
the best way to get advance tickets; can I call the Cubs' ticket office
directly and pick up tickets at the will call window?
3) Any advice on where to eat before or after the game?
4) Do they allow inflatable I-luv-ewe dolls (present from Lundy) into the
bleachers? :-)
| rec.sport.baseball |
I am interested in uncovering statistics on Boston Red Sox players from
March 1992 - present. I want to look at changes in batting average, hits,
multi-hit games, runs, stolen bases, and on base % during
every game. Where can
I find this information? Do any sports magazines log this info or do I
have to go directly to the ball club?
Thanks for the info. Kip
| rec.sport.baseball |
Well, actually now that you mention it, a few weeks ago the CBC ran a
documentary on "Ice Hockey in Harlem". the Canadian Club of New York
(something like that) sponsors a league for kids in Harlem and based on
the TV report they all seemed to be having a lot of fun. All playing
with regular equipment, jerseys, etc etc, on a proper outdoor rink. It
looked just like kids playing hockey anywhere else. | rec.sport.hockey |
jlevine@rd.hydro.on.ca (Jody Levine) writes...
I've already discussed this in e-mail with Jonathan. It's the film
"The Inspector General" [:-)], with Danny Kaye, although I can't quote the
name of the leading lady (Because Maltin doesn't :-(). Jonathan thinks there
was an earlier Russian film; "Movies on TV" just says it was based on a Gogol
(Yes, Jonathan, I looked it up again -- only two o's) story. | rec.motorcycles |
Please count me in also...
Just can't tell you how excited I was when the Islanders beat the Rangers
in overtime on last Friday!!! | rec.sport.hockey |
Pens-6 NJ Devils-6
FIRST PERIOD: SCORING: 1, Pittsburgh, Daniels(Needham, Tippett)4:14.
2, NJ Devils, C. Lemieux(Semak, Driver)10:19. 3, Pittsburgh, Stevens
(Tocchet, Murphy)12:40ppg. 4, NJ Devils, Zelepukin(Driver, Niedermayer)
17:26. PENALTIES: PGH, Stevens(roughing)1:30. NJD, Pellerin-double
minor(cross-checking)1:30. NJD, Zelepukin(tripping)7:21. NJD,
Stasny(holding)11:15. PGH, Taglianetti(roughing)13:51. NJD, Lemieux
(roughing)13:51. PGH, Jagr(tripping)15:23.
SECOND PERIOD: SCORING: 5, Pittsburgh, Lemieux(Murphy, Tocchet)1:42.
6, NJ Devils, Semak(Lemieux, Zelepukin)2:27. 7, Pittsburgh, McEachern
(Jagr, Barrasso)4:24. 8, NJD, Stevens(Guerin, Pellerin)5:45. 9,
Pittsburgh, Lemieux(unassisted)12:40shg. 10, NJ Devils, Richer
(Nicholls)15:53. 11, NJ Devils, Lemieux(Zelepukin)17:40. PENALTIES:
PGH, Stevens(roughing)3:06. NJD, McKay(roughing)3:06. PGH, Mullen
(hooking)10:42. PGH, Tocchet(roughing)12:06. NJD, Stevens(slashing)
12:06. NJD, Lemieux(unsportsmanlike conduct)12:40. PGH, U.
Samuelsson(cross checking)20:00. PGH, Barrasso-double minor(spearing)
served by McEachern, 20:00. NJD, Holik(cross checking)20:00. NJD,
Lemieux(roughing)20:00.
THIRD PERIOD: SCORING: 12, Pittsburgh, Mullen(Jagr, Lemieux)18:54.
PENALTIES: NJD, Daneyko(interference)3:37. PGH, Stevens(roughing)
9:18. NJD, Holik(roughing)9:18. PGH, match penalty-game misconduct,9:50.
NJD, Zelepukin(tripping)12:01. PGH, Stevens(roughing)18:41. NJD,
Daneyko(roughing)18:41.
OVERTIME: SCORING: No scoring. PENALTIES: No penalties.
SHOTS ON GOAL:
Pittsburgh: 9-11-8-2=30
NJ Devils: 12-15-9-3=39
GOALIES:
Barrasso(39 shots, 33 saves. 43-14-5)
Billington(30 shots, 24 saves)
REF: Devorski Linesmen: Gauthier, Vines | rec.sport.hockey |
^^^^
^^^^^^^^
^^^
Geez, can I type or what?
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder | rec.sport.baseball |
I am fortunate enough to have tickets for an Orioles-Red Sox game in
Baltimore on Saturday, July 31st. I haven't been to the new park,
and I was wondering if anyone out there can give me pointers or good tips
or anything helpful about the place so that I can enjoy every moment spent
there.
For instance, what time do the gates open? Do we see the Orioles take BP?
When will the Red Sox take BP? Anything you can tell me would be
appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Please respond to my e-mail address.
I know it's still three-and-a-half months away, but I'm psyched!
| rec.sport.baseball |
It was great to hear that UMass is bringing back hockey! It reminded me that a
couple of years ago there was talk that both Bimidgi (sp?) and Mankato State
trying to upgrade their programs to Div. 1 status. I also seem to remember
that they had some trouble with new NCAA rule about just who was allowed to
compete at the Div. 1 level. Was that ever resolved? Also, I was just
wondering if there is ANY college hockey east of Colorado (Alaska excepted).
With the new popularity of hockey on the west coast, I would expect there to
be some interest building at the collegiate levels too. Anyone heard anything?
James Old, e-mail JOLD@vma.cc.nd.edu
| rec.sport.hockey |
I don't know if you could call him rushed, but "Big" Ben McDonald didn't
much time at all in the minors. Of course that was because the balls used
in AAA had seams too large and gave McDonald blisters forcing him to go
on the DL several times. He's done most of his learning here in the majors.
Of course Gregg "Wild Thing" Olson and Mike "Deserved a Cy Young" Mussina
didn't spend much time in the minors either. I read somewhere that pitchers
are less likely to need that much time in the minors anyway so maybe that
has something to do with it.
Let's go O's! Why Not?
Admiral Steve "Still reliving Sept. 30, 1989" Liu
____________________________________________________________________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| rec.sport.baseball |
o Subaru Service Manuals ................................... $10.00
This is not a complete set, but includes sections 4, 5
& 6 which cover MECHANICAL COMPONENTS (suspension, wheels
& axles, steering, brakes, pedals & control cables, heater
& ventilator, air conditioning), BODY (body & exterior,
doors & windows, seats, seat belts, interior, instrument
panel), and ELECTRICAL (engine electrical system, body
electrical system, wiring diagram, and trouble-shooting).
These are the genuine Subaru issue manuals. They are for
model year 1986, but have plenty of good information that
applies to other years as well.
And, as long as I'm posting (end of car stuff),
o Miscellaneous Darkroom Equipment ........................ $75.00
Solar enlarger (several objective lenses) with easel and
timer, negative carriers for 35mm and 2 1/4 x 3 1/4, misc.
printing masks. Developing tanks, thermometer, trays,
constant-temperature bath, ground glass, mirrors, darkroom
lamps, glassware, el-cheap-o tripods..... and (as they say)
MUCH MORE!
o Beautiful Antique Buffet ............................... $1500.00
Solid cherry (no veneer). Handmade, with very interesting
dovetail corners in the drawers. Built (we think) around
1880. Not gaudy or covered with gew-gaws; a simple, elegant
piece of furniture, but too big (60" long, 37" tall, 24"
deep) for our little Cape Cod house.
Will deliver pricier items (ie, over $10) anywhere in the Rochester
area. (And will consider delivering the others.) Will deliver any
of it on UofR Campus between now and graduation. | rec.autos |
I doubt Henderson would clear waivers. And if he did, he would
instantly be signed for the major league minimum, with Oakland picking
up the remaining $3 million tab.
Some GMs value on-field performance too... | rec.sport.baseball |
What can you expect from a buffoon who said that the Pens should have
drafted Kirk Muller instead of Mario Lemieux?
Perhaps once upon a time Don Cherry had some insight into the game of
hockey, but he's really degenerated into a parody of himself. | rec.sport.hockey |
Actually, Gaetti's first year with California was 1991. His .632 DA wasn't
out of line with his career averages, and his .616 was actually below average
in 1988. But check out the last three years at the Metrodome.
1990
Gaetti .655
AL Avg .604
1991
Pags .744
Leius .653
Al Avg .620
1992
Leius .680
AL Avg .603
For the last three years, the highest DAs in either league have been posted
by Minnesota players -- three different ones, including one (Pags) who was
mediocre to horrible elsewhere. That doesn't *prove* a park effect is at
work, any more than San Diego's horrible infield numbers prove a park effect
is at work. But it looks like a strong possibility to me.
Lots
And it might even be a nice play to thrid base.
--
Dale J. Stephenson |*| (steph@cs.uiuc.edu) |*| Baseball fanatic | rec.sport.baseball |
Chris Chelios was Montreal's co-captain with Guy Carbonneau when he was traded to Chicago for Denis Savard, and Peter Stastny was captain of the Quebec Nordiques when he was traded to New-Jersey. Also Mark Messier was captain of the Edmonton Oilers when he was traded to New-York. How about Dale Hawerchuk with Winnipeg when he was traded to Buffalo, was he captain too ? I think so. I should not forget Wayne (you know who) when he was traded to L.A. he was captain. Didn't they strip Wendel Clark of his capta
incy in Toronto ?
Just some updates and thoughts.
Cheer...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Piche (LMC/U/DET - Design)
Ericsson Communications Inc.
8400 Decarie Blvd, 1rd floor
Town of Mont Royal, Quebec. H4P 2N2
(514)-738-8300 ext. 2178.
E-mail: LMCDAPI@LMC.ERICSSON.SE
MEMOid: LMC.LMCDAPI
CHEERS..... | rec.sport.hockey |
Toronto 1 1 1--3
Detroit 1 4 1--6
First period
1, Detroit, Yzerman 1 (Gallant, Ciccarelli) 4:48.
2, Toronto, Cullen 1 (Clark, Gill) 10:44.
Second period
3, Detroit, Sheppard 1 (Probert, Coffey) pp, 5:04.
4, Detroit, Burr 1 (Racine) sh, 6:42.
5, Detroit, Chiasson 1 (Coffey) pp,11:00.
6, Detroit, Howe 1 (Yzerman, Drake) 14:46.
7, Toronto, Gilmour 1 (Borschevsky, Ellett) pp, 19:59.
Third period
8, Detroit, Racine 1 (Primeau, Drake) 5:10.
9, Toronto, Lefebvre 1 (Cullen, Pearson) 7:45.
Detroit: 6 Power play: 6-2 Special goals: pp: 2 sh: 1 Total: 3
Scorer G A Pts
--------------- --- --- ---
Burr 1 0 1
Chiasson 1 0 1
Ciccarelli 0 1 1
Coffey 0 2 2
Drake 0 2 2
Gallant 0 1 1
Howe 1 0 1
Primeau 0 1 1
Probert 0 1 1
Racine 1 1 2
Sheppard 1 0 1
Yzerman 1 1 2
Toronto: 3 Power play: 5-1
Scorer G A Pts
--------------- --- --- ---
Borschevsky 0 1 1
Clark 0 1 1
Cullen 1 1 2
Ellett 0 1 1
Gill 0 1 1
Gilmour 1 0 1
Lefebvre 1 0 1
Pearson 0 1 1
-----------------------------------------
Winnipeg 1 0 1--2
Vancouver 2 0 2--4
First period
1, Vancouver, Adams 1 (Linden, Bure) pp, 1:23.
2, Vancouver, Craven 1 (Bure, Murzyn) 9:56.
3, Winnipeg, Steen 1 (Shannon, Housley) pp, 17:53.
Second period
No scoring.
Third period
4, Winnipeg, King 1 (Barnes) 3:43.
5, Vancouver, Linden 1(Courtnall, McLean) 12:16.
6, Vancouver, Ronning 1 (Courtnall) 18:31.
Vancouver: 4 Power play: 6-1
Scorer G A Pts
--------------- --- --- ---
Adams 1 0 1
Bure 0 2 2
Courtnall 0 2 2
Craven 1 0 1
Linden 1 1 2
McLean 0 1 1
Murzyn 0 1 1
Ronning 1 0 1
Winnipeg: 2 Power play: 3-1
Scorer G A Pts
--------------- --- --- ---
Barnes 0 1 1
Housley 0 1 1
King 1 0 1
Shannon 0 1 1
Steen 1 0 1
| rec.sport.hockey |
Being a proud BU alumnus, I'd like to get a list of BU players in
the NHL so I can keep an eye on their progress. A lot of Terriers are
graduating this year so I hope to see them soon in the NHL. If somebody
could post or send me a list, I'd appreciate it. Please note if the player
graduated from here or not.
| rec.sport.hockey |
Aargh!
Paul Stewart is the worst and most biased ref. presently in the NHL.
He called a total of 4 penalties on the Habs and one on the Nordiques.
The Nords' penalty came in O.T. Stewart, being an ex-Nordique himself,
was looking to call penalties on the Habs while letting the Nords
get away with murder...WE WAS ROBBED!!!!
It was an excellent game with plenty of end-to-end rushes and tremendous
goalkeeping. The Nords tied it with over 1 minute to go while Lebeau
was serving a penalty. I don't mind Stewart calling a penalty in the
last 5 min. of the game, but AT LEAST BE FAIR ABOUT IT. The Nords were
caught with their hand in the cookie jar more than once. Stewart turned
the other cheek...BASTARD!
Patrick Roy collapsed after letting in the tieing goal. He was shaky and
on his knees for the rest of the night. The winning goal shouldn't have
gone in.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming the loss on Stewart. The Habs had
plenty of chances to capitalize, Muller, LeClair, Haller, etc. but
failed to put the puck in the net. That's what did them in. But
Mr. Stewart didn't help matters at all.
Oh well, at least the Bruins lost in O.T. also Ha, Ha!!--)
,,,
(0-0)
============================oOO(_)OOo===================================
The Czar of Mainframe Computing <JBE5@MUSICB.MCGILL.CA>
McGill University
--> I'M TOO SEXY FOR COBOL.
---> Habs...will beat the Nords in 7!!!!
---> Let's Go Expos!
===========================================
| Hickory, dickory doc, |
| She took a good look at your cock. |
| It's really scary all rinkled and hairy,|
| It smells like a 10 year old sock! |
| --Andrew Dice Clay |
=========================================== | rec.sport.hockey |
As the subject says. It has 70k and my brother-in-law wants $250. Please don't
reply to me as I am posting this for him. Here's his numbers :
5pm-10pm 712 676 3669
daytime 712 269 1261
| rec.autos |
} The roar at Michigan and Trumbull should be loader than ever this year. With
} Mike Illitch at the head and Ernie Harwell back at the booth, the tiger bats
} will bang this summer. Already they have scored 20 runs in two games and with
} Fielder, Tettleton, and Deer I think they can win the division. No pitching!
} Bull! Gully, Moore, Wells, and Krueger make up a decent staff that will keep
} the team into many games. Then there is Henneman to close it out. Watch out
} Boston, Toronto, and Baltimore - the Motor City Kittys are back.
nice woofing (or should i say meowing?).
and yes, the Tiggers are a fun, exciting team that i would pay to see.
but last year, they went 75-87. this year, their offense is essentially
the same, and their pitching is, at best, essentially the same. so why
do you think they will suddenly improve to win the 92 or so games which will
be required to win the A.L. East? what has changed that i don't see?
remember, a 20-4 win is worth as much in the standings as a 3-2 win... | rec.sport.baseball |
I'm thinking of buying a new Dodge Intrepid - Has anyone had any
experiences that they'd like to share?
Thanks. | rec.autos |
As I won't be able to make the Joust this summer (Job related time
conflict :'^{ ), I plan instead on going to the Rider Rally in
Knoxville.
I'll be leaving from Chicago. and generally plan on going down along
the Indiana/Illinois border into Kentucky and then Tennessee. I would
be very interested in hearing suggestions of roads/routes/areas that
you would consider "must ride" while on the way to Knoxville.
I can leave as early as 5/22 and need to arrive in Knoxville by 6PM
on 5/25. That leaves me a pretty good stretch of time to explore on
the way.
By the way if anyone else is going, and would like to partner for the
ride down, let me know. I'll be heading east afterward to visit family,
but sure don't mind company on the ride down to the Rally. Depending on
weather et al. my plan is motelling/tenting thru the trip.
From the Rally I'll be heading up the Blue Ridge Parkway, then jogging
into West Va (I-77) to run up 219 -> Marlington, 28 -> Petersburg,
55E -> I-81/I-66E. After this point the route is presently undetermined
into Pennsylvania, New York?, and back to Chicago (by 6/6). Suggestions
for these areas would be of great interest also.
Many thanks for your ideas,
Enjoy,
| rec.motorcycles |
Sounds a lot more like an Opel GT to me. I'd guess that this is on the same
chassis as the Kadett, rather than the bigger Manta - but I could easily
be wrong. I think the later Kadett's were sold here as Buick Opels. | rec.autos |
What, a dog weighs 150lb maybe, at max? You can't handle it?
You have, I presume, thumbs? Grapple with it and tear it's head
off!
Sheesh, even a trained attack dog is no match for a human,
we have *all* the advantages.
Regards, Charles
DoD0.001
RZ350 | rec.motorcycles |
Were they palying football or baseball in Detroit on Saturday? From looking
at the school, some people may think it was football. Between two games this
week, the Tigers scored 40 runs!!!! The offense can carry them, I hope the
pitching will hold out. I was at Camden Yards yesterday, everytime I looked
up the score was getting higher. What a great site it was to see the Tigers
kicking butt while enjoying a game at Camden Yards. GO TIGERS AND GO TONY
PHILLIPS!!!!!!!!
| rec.sport.baseball |
About as good as Mussina's. better than Sutcliffe's and McDonald's
He's in the bullpen. Steinbrenner is in charge after all.
He's got the talent to be the 4th starter now, and evetually the ace.
He was a higher ranked (and generally better) prospect than Arthur
Rhodes who happens to be, well hey, the Oriole's 4th starter.
As for Militello, it's still early. | rec.sport.baseball |
Howdy,
I'm a little new to this newsgroup, but I would like to tap some of the
knowledge and expertise available here.
The Subject: After-market cruise controls
The Background:
I recently broke my ankle in a road-bicycling accident (4 places, five
screws, yuk! :-( ). In two weeks I will be returning to Texas (my
home) from my school (BYU) in Provo, Utah. As you can imagine, trying to
drive nearly 1300 miles with a broken right ankle isn't just the epitome of
a good time. My car does not have a cruise control, so I would have to do
all the pedalling (ha ha) with my messed-up ankle.
My question:
What is the general opinion of after-market cruise control units? I
realize that a cheap CC (cruise control) from, say, Pep Boys, isn't going to
be as good as a factory or professionally installed unit (if there is such a
thing). And I uderstand that I probably can't expect much in the way of
accuracy, looks and that sort of thing; But anything's gotta be better than
trying to drive with a hosed ankle.
I have a 1984 Jeep Cherokee, 4 speed, standard, 4*4, 2.5L engine with
kettering(sp?) ignition (y'know, distributor cap, rotor, that set-up--not
electronic. Maybe you could've guessed it being an '84, but I'm just trying
to give information as completly as I can).
I found a CC unit for 80 bucks. It seems to use the vehicles vacuum system
instead of an electric servor/motor. Is this good or bad? If I did buy
this CC, which vacuum hose should I tap?
It has two speed sensors: One magnetic, and one that gets a signal from the
negative side of the distributor, kinda like a tach pick-up, or so I
understand. I can use either one. Which is best? The manual says (I read
it in the store today) that the magnetic/axle set-up is more accurate, but
harder to install. Is there really a big difference?
It has a sensor for the brake pedal, just like other CCs, but does NOT have a
sensor for the clutch pedal. So if I wasn't paying real close attention I
might push the clutch in while the cruise is trying to get the speed up. Which
would wind the engine up kinda high until I got my wits about me and turned
the thing off. I'm pretty coordinated, so this doesn't bother me, if it
were for my girlfriends car, *then* it would bother me, but I'm ok with it.
The installation also calls for an attachment to a steady-on brake signal
and a switched-on brake signal. I think I can get a switched brake signal
from the correct side of the brake light blade fuse. Am I right? But I'm
not sure where to get the steady-on brake signal, or, for that matter, what
exactly it is? Any ideas as to what the manufaturer wants and where to get
it?
I think I can figure the other things out. Like how to hook-up the negative
side tach-type sensing gizmo and the cabin control unit, and the ground and
all that miscellaneous business. But I need a little help with:
1. Is it worth the money and safety risk (if any) for such a
device?
2. Is there any particularly good after-market CC?
3. Are "professionally" installed CCs signifacantly better and
worth the cabbage?
4. If the unit I saw (sorry, no manufacturer or model number, just
that it is at Pep Boy and its $80) is sufficient for my simple
needs, how do I get the thing installed properly (specifically,
the questions above)?
My father and I built a "Veep" (Volkswagen powered Jeep CJ-2A) when I was in
high school, so I consider myself fairly good with tools, electronics, and
cars. So the installation doesn't scare me. I just want to be certain that
I get the thing installed correctly as my Cherokee is just a wee bit more
complicated than my Veep. :-)
I appreciate your time in reading my post, and I would appreciate any
expertise or opinion anybody has on the subject. If you would like to share
some of your wisdom, please email as I don't get over this group very often
(but I check my mail all the time).
Again, thanks for any help anyone may have. | rec.autos |
rec.autos |
|
Sixteen days I had put off test driving the Honda ST1100. Finally,
the 17th was a Saturday without much rain. In fact it cleared up,
became warm and sunny, and the wind died. About three weeks ago, I
took a long cool ride on the Hawk down to Cycles! 128 for a test ride.
They had sold, and delivered, the demo ST1100 about fifteen hours
before I arrived. And the demo VFR was bike-locked in the showroom --
surrounded by 150 other bikes, and not likely to move soon.
Today was different. There were even more bikes. 50 used dirt bikes,
50 used street bikes, 35 cars, and a big tent full of Outlandishly Fat
Touring Bikes With Trailers were all squeezed in the parking lot.
Some sort of fat bike convention. Shelly and Dave were running one
MSF course each, at the same time. One in the classroom and one on
the back lot. Plus, there was the usuall free cookout food that
Cycles! gives away every weekend in the summer. Hmmm, it seemed like
a big moto party.
After about ten minutes of looking for Rob C, cheif of sales slime,
and another 5 minutes reading and signing a long disclosure/libility/
pray-to-god form I helped JT push the ST out into the mess in the
parking lot. We went over the the controls, I put the tank bag from
the Hawk into the right saddlebag, and my wife put everything else
into the left saddlebag. ( Thats nice.... ) Having helped push the
ST out to the lot, I thought it best to have JT move it to the edge of
the road, away from the 100+ bikes and 100+ people. He rode it like a
bicycle! 'It cant be that heavy' I thought.
Well I was wrong. As I sat on the ST, both feet down, all I could
think was "big". Then I put one foot up. "Heavy" came to mind very
quickly. With Cindy on the back -- was she on the back? Hard to
tell with seat three times as large as a Hawk seat -- the bike seemed
nearly out of control just idling on the side of the road.
By 3000 rpm in second gear, all the weight seemed to dissappear. Even
on bike with 4.1 miles on the odometer, slippery new tires, and pads that
did not yet bite the disks, things seems smooth and sure. Cycles! is
on a section of 128 that few folks ever ride. About 30 miles north
of the computer concentration, about five miles north of where I95
splits away, 128 is a lighly travelled, two lane limited access
highway. It goes through heavily forested sections of Hamilton,
Manchester-by-the-Sea and Newbury on its way to Gloucester.
On its way there, it meets 133, a road that winds from the sea about
30 miles inland to Andover. On its way it goes through many
thoroughly New England spots. Perfect, if slow, sport touring sections.
Cindy has no difficulty with speed. 3rd gear, 4th gear, purring along
in top gear. This thing has less low rpm grunt that my Hawk. Lane
changes were a new experience. A big heft is required to move this
thing. Responds well though. No wallowing or complaint. Behind the
fairing it was fairly quiet, but the helmet buffeting was
non-trivial. Top gear car passing at 85mph was nearly effortless.
Smooth, smooth, smooth. Not sure what the v4 sound reminds me of,
but it is pleasant. If only the bars were not transmitting an endless
buzz.
The jump on to 133 caused me to be less than impressed with the
brakes. Its a down hill, reversing camber, twice-reversing radius,
decreasing radius turn. A real squeeze is needed on the front binder.
The section of 133 we were on was tight, but too urban. The ST works ok
in this section, but it shows its weight. We went by the clam shack
oft featured in "Spencer for Hire" -- a place where you could really
find "Spencer", his house was about 15 miles down 133. After putting
through traffic for a while, we turned and went back to 128.
About half way through the onramp, I yanked Cindy's wrist, our singal
for "hold on tight". Head check left, time to find redline. Second
gear gives a good shove. Third too. Fourth sees DoD speed with a
short shift into top. On the way to 133 we saw no cops and very light
traffic. Did not cross into DoD zone because the bike was too new.
Well, now it had 25 miles on it, so it was ok. Tried some high effort
lane changes, some wide sweeping turns. Time to wick it up? I went
until the buffeting was threating to pull us off the seat. And stayed
there. When I was comfortable with the wind and the steering,
I looked down to find an indicated 135mph. Not bad for 2-up touring.
Beverly comes fast at more than twice the posted limit. At the "get
off in a mile" sign, I rolled off the throttle and coasted. I wanted
to re-adjust to the coming slowness. It was a good idea: there were
several manhole-sized patches of sand on the exit ramp. Back to the
slow and heavy behavior. Cycles! is about a mile from 128. I could
see even more cars stacked up outside right when I got off. I managed
to thread the ST through the cars to the edge of the concrete pad
out front. Heavy. It took way too much effort for Cindy and I to put
the thing on the center stand. I am sure that if I used the side
stand the ST would have been on its side within a minute.
My demo opinion? Heavy. Put it on a diet. Smooth, comfortable,
hardly notices the DoD speed. I'd buy on for about $3000 less than
list, just like it is. Too much $ for the bike as it is. | rec.motorcycles |
I am selling my Sportster to make room for a new FLHTCU.
This scoot is in excellent condition and has never been wrecked or abused.
Always garaged.
1990 Sportster 883 Standard (blue)
factory 1200cc conversion kit
less than 8000 miles
Branch ported and polished big valve heads
Screamin Eagle carb
Screamin Eagle cam
adjustable pushrods
Harley performance mufflers
tachometer
new Metzeler tires front and rear
Progressive front fork springs
Harley King and Queen seat and sissy bar
everything chromed
O-ring chain
fork brace
oil cooler and thermostat
new Die-Hard battery
bike cover | rec.motorcycles |
Then allow me to enlighten you, Rex. You see, there's a thing called a tie.
A tie is worth one point (I know, I know. You're not good at math. But bear
with me). A win is worth two points. So, getting two ties is the same as
getting one win. If your team played two games, won one and lost one, you'd
have two points. If my team played two games and tied them both, we'd also
have two points. We'd be tied in the standings even though our records are
different.
Perhaps you should learn something about hockey before posting again. (I am
starting to sound like Roger or what?) | rec.sport.hockey |
Definitely!
Safety is an important criterium for me when buying a car. I won't buy a
small car like a Civic or whatever.
Great = Safety + Handling + Speed - for me
Seems to me that you would be more "dead" in a small car than a large car
after an accident. | rec.autos |
Re: Waving...
I must say, that the courtesy of a nod or a wave as I meet other bikers while
riding does a lot of good things to my mood... While riding is a lot of fun by
itself, there's something really special about having someone say to you "Hey,
it's a great day for a ride... Isn't it wonderful that we can spend some time
on the road on days like this..." with a gesture.
Was sunny today for the first time in a week, took my bike out for a spin down
to the local salvage yard/bike shop... ran into about 20 other people who were
down there for similar reasons (there's this GREAT stretch of road on the way
down there... no side streets, lotsa leaning bends... ;) ... Went on an
impromptu coffee and bullshit run down to puyallup with a batch of people who
I didn't know, but who were my kinda people nonetheless.
As a fellow commented to me while I was admiring his bike... "Hey, it's not
what you ride, it's that you ride... As long as it has 2 wheels and an engine
it's the same thing..."
-- | rec.motorcycles |
Hello everyone. I'm new to motorcycles so no flames please. I don't
have my bike yet so I need a few pieces of information:
1) I only have about $1200-1300 to work with, so that would have
to cover everything (bike, helmet, anything else that I'm too
ignorant to know I need to buy)
2) What is buying a bike going to do to my insurance? I turn 18 in
about a month so my parents have been taking care of my insurance up
till now, and I need a comprehensive list of costs that buying a
motorcycle is going to insure (I live in Washington DC if that makes
a difference)
3) Any recommendations on what I should buy/where I should look for it?
4) In DC, as I imagine it is in every other state (OK, OK, we're not a
state - we're not bitter ;)), you take the written test first and then
get a learners permit. However, I'm wondering how one goes about
learning to ride the bike proficiently enough so as to a) get a liscence
and b) not kill oneself. I don't know anyone with a bike who could
teach me, and the most advice I've heard is either "do you live near a
field" or "do you have a friend with a pickup truck", the answers to both
of which are NO. Do I just ride around my neighborhood and hope for
the best? I kind of live in a residential area but it's not suburbs.
It's still the big city and I'm about a mile from downtown so that
doesn't seem too viable. Any stories on how you all learned?
Thanks for any replies in advance.
-Greg Humphreys
:wq
^^^
Meant to do that. (Damn autoindent)
| rec.motorcycles |
<<I wrote>
<Is there a resource available to the consumer comparing all of the makes
<and models of automobiles, trucks, vans, etc. for survivability in a
<crash of different severities?
<...
<Also, I've found very little objective data comparing different
<vehicles for handling, pick-up, braking, expected maintenance, etc.
<I recall years ago Consumer Reports annual buyer's guide was much more
<informative in those aspects than it is now.
Thanks to a reply from someone I looked a little further and found what
I was looking for. The April CR magazine has most of the above things.
Despite recent articles here the ratings looked pretty good for
relative comparison purposes. Unfortunately the crash test comparisons
didn't include half of the cars I'm comparing.
Anybody know how '93 Honda Civic hatchbacks and Toyota Tercels fare in
an accident?
| rec.autos |
********* 1990 Integra LS for Sale *********
5 speed, sunroof, rear spoiler, new tires
59.7K miles
$ 7950 or best offer.
call 908-949-0878
908-938-4101
email att!hotsoup!peng | rec.autos |
There's also Billy Jack, The Wild One, Smokey and the Bandit
(Where Jerry Reed runs his truck over Motorcycle Gangs Bikes),
and a video tape documentary on the Hell's Angels I
found in a rental store once
| rec.motorcycles |
Oh come on, Silly, all you have to do is cut a hole in your hood and
put a tube there so you can get to the oil fill hole. What do you
think all those big air intake things are for on those hot-rod cars?
They're just for looks only...little does anyone know, they provide
access to the oil-fill hole. | rec.autos |
Sometimes a bad choke pull-off diaphram will cause a car to fast idle. The
pull-off, which is vacuum actuated, provides a necessary pull in non-cold
weather conditions to get the idle off the the fast idle cam. Locate the
fast idle cam on your vehicle and see if you can rotate it to produce a
normal idle. If so, locate the diaphram and test it. If you can't apply
suction (via a good piece of rubber vacuum hose) with your mouth that will
cause the diaphram to retract, then it's bad and should be replaced. | rec.autos |
Catcher is their weakest position, with the possible exception of second base.
They have a chance to simultaneously replace their biggest offensive problem
spot with a well-above-average offensive player *and* acclimate a highly
promising potential star with no pressure on him to carry the team, and they
want to play *Olson* and *Berryhill* instead?!
"A catcher's defensive reputation will be inversely proportional to his
recent offensive level of performance." Thus, Mickey Tettleton goes (in
the media) from being a no-hit defensive whiz to a slugging thumb-finger
in two short years. The rule doesn't apply to perceived "superstars", who
get the Gold Glove Offensive Transfer effect instead. Greg Olson is probably
considered to be a good defensive catcher precisely because he can't hit.
Aren't they the same thing?
Either that or just stupidity.
Of course.
One could make the same sort of argument in other cases. Pete Rose, in
pursuing Ty Cobb's record, was a huge gate attraction (and national media
magnet). The Reds made a lot of money off that; they also wasted the prime
of Eric Davis. That may be "good business", but that doesn't mean I don't
loathe them for it.
| rec.sport.baseball |
Actually, they're pretty worthless, if you want to evaluate players
with stats. RBIs and Runs Scored should be banned; all they do is
confuse victims of mediot brainwashing like yourself.
You
Uh, so?
You've just explained why we use OBP and SLG to evaluate players.
Precisely because the team that scores more runs wins the game.
Traditional baseball stats have gotten way too far away from methods
which enable fans to see who contributes to those runs scored - that's
where OBP, SLG, Runs Created, Linear Weights, etc. come in. These
simplify matters so that we can more easily measure a player's
offensive contribution to the team's runs scored.
Thank you for making our case. Have a nice day. | rec.sport.baseball |