text
stringlengths
0
74.9k
label_text
stringclasses
4 values
Article from as follows
rec.sport.baseball
cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs scuk cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs cuck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck cubs suck oh yeah, he aqlso added that harry is a drunken idiot who shoulda stayed in st louis where his heart is, but also added that fair weathered fans all like to be together. i guess this is the reason harry is now a cub fan, bud man. note he never really left st, louis. jim walker
rec.sport.baseball
Does anybody else think that WS stats should become part of a player's career stats? Why not?
rec.sport.baseball
You can avoid these problems entirely by installing an oil drain valve in place of the bolt. I have one on both of my cars. There have been no leaks in 210,000 miles (combined miles on both cars).
rec.autos
When I'm riding my 900RR, my goodies are already up against the tank, because the design of the Corbin seat tends to move you forward. Wouldn't the major danger to one's cajones be due to accelerating into and then being stopped by the tank? If you're already there, there wouldn't be an impact problem, would there? - Michael -
rec.motorcycles
I don't know about trains, but I've saw a sign on the back of a Greyhound bus that warns you that your radar detector may be set off. It doesn't explain why, but it does set off my radar detector.
rec.autos
That brings up an interesting point. Anyone else catch ESPN's piece about prospects and the relationship between age, career length, MVPs and Hall of Fame members? It was part of their preseason special. Basically, they looked at players that had amassed 1000 plate appearances (or ABs) by the time they were 24, and noticed some interesting things. For starters, they found out such players comprised the majority of MVPs in the history of the game. They also found out such players represented the majority of the players in the hall of fame. The kicker, though, was that they actually did some number-crunching and found that such players' careers lasted much longer than the careers of players not in that group. They also found that these players produced at both a greater level of performance and produced over twice the raw totals (HRs, etc) of the other players. The first group outhit the second something like .282 to .260 in raw BA, and blew away the second group in such categories as HRs, 2Bs, RBIs, etc. It was the most impressive thing I've seen on ESPN in recent memory. I guess Ray Knight makes his rebuttal tonight.
rec.sport.baseball
Well, simply put, drinking is irrelavent. Driving drunk is indefensable and unforgivable. There is a large differnece. But, then, with an attitude like yours, I expect you'll be dead soon. I just hope you don't take a human being out with you.
rec.motorcycles
How does one read the betting spreads for baseball? They tend to be something like 8-9 which means it must not be runs! Thanks. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Rex Wood -- davewood@cs.colorado.edu -- University of Colorado at Boulder
rec.sport.baseball
I'm still catching up from Spring Break, but bear with me... Javy Lopez has proven, over 1400+ AB in the minor leagues, that he is ready to play in the majors. He is *not* being rushed. Players who are clearly too good for AA and play behind stiffs at the major league level are wasting their time, and may actually have a court case against major league management for keeping them, at AAA. Unless Lopez is *me* defensively (I'm 5'7'', 165 and born to play second base :-)), he belongs in the major leagues. Valentine isn't saying he should back up. He's saying he should be put in a position to *win* the job in the major leagues, which, IMHO, he would if given the opportunity. (Val, if I'm misinterpreting, please let me know.) But the players who *are* ready are 1)the best and 2) the ones most likely to benefit from being in the majors. Javy Lopez is not a middle- of-the-road prospect. He's the real thing. NOW. Again, the most important thing a player can do is hit. Lopez does that miles better than Olson or Berryhill. If his defense is good enough for Greenville, or Richmond, it's good enough for Atlanta. If he really was awful defensively, he would no longer be a catcher. See Sprague, Ed. Oh, where to start... OK. First of all, solid != good. I want good players. Solid is one of those words used to describe nice white guys who really aren't very good at baseball. Think of it as "TWG" without the caps. It's a losing strategy to say, "We have solid guys, we don't need to improve." You used it four times in that paragraph, BTW. Same for experienced. I might add, though, that Greg Olson and Damon Berryhill aren't exactly Carter and Fisk. Olson has played three years, Berryhill five, although 90 and 91 were a wash. The only difference, IMHO, between Olson and Valle is the supporting cast. "Two big bats." Hrm. I like Justice, but I find Mr. Gant's trend disturbing. Call it one and a maybe. The Braves' platoon is OK, but neither player has *any* value outside of the platoon. Bream vs. LH and Hunter vs. RH are awful. I'll leave the thirdbase comment alone. Pendleton has wasted too much bandwidth already. If the CF platoon hits .300, I'll retrace Mr. Likhani's midnight run down Forbes, and I live in NY and LA. (Got that, Mike?) And doesn't Cox call pitches, anyway? Nope. They're baseball management, possible the most short-sighted collection of people in the nation. Do you not believe this goes on, Mark? Do you think Frank Thomas needed those three months in AAA in 1990? Or Cal Eldred wasn't *really* better than Ricky Bones last year? You're mostly polite; make defensible, if flawed cases; have wit and have, in the past, admitted being wrong. That does qualify you on r.s.b. We'll make an SDCN out of you, yet :-)
rec.sport.baseball
Group A Group B ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ Cardiff Devils 7-3 Bracknell Bees Nottingham Panthers 8-3 Billingham Humberside 7-7 Whitley Warriors Murrayfield Racers 11-2 Fife Flyers Whitley Bay 6-9 Cardiff Devils Billingham Bombers 6-8 Murrayfield Humberside 8-5 Bracknell Bees Nottingham Panthers 11-5 Fife Flyers Cardiff Devils 10-4 Humberside Murrayfield Racers 6-4 Nottingham Bracknell Bees 4-9 Whitley Bay Fife Flyers 2-5 Billingham Bracknell Bees 3-8 Cardiff Devils Billingham Bombers 2-8 Nottingham Whitley Bay 5-7 Humberside Fife Flyers 3-12 Murrayfield P W D L F A P P W D L F A P Cardiff Devils 4 4 0 0 34 16 8* Murrayfield Racers 4 4 0 0 37 15 8* Humberside 4 2 1 1 26 27 5 Nottingham Panthers 4 3 0 1 31 16 6* Whitley Bay 4 1 1 2 27 27 3 Billingham Bombers 4 1 0 3 16 26 2 Bracknell Bees 4 0 0 4 15 32 0 Fife Flyers 4 0 0 4 12 39 0 * indicates qualified for Championship Finals Relegation/Promotion A Relegation/Promotion B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Basingstoke 10-4 Swindon Wildcats Sheffield Steelers 12-8 Peterborough Durham Wasps 13-5 Romford Raiders Slough Jets 1-9 MK Kings Basingstoke 6-0 Durham Wasps Sheffield Steelers 9-4 Milton Keynes Swindon 8-5 Romford Raiders Milton Keynes Kings 4-6 Peterborough Durham Wasps 17-2 Swindon Wildcats Slough Jets 2-12 Sheffield Romford 4-10 Basingstoke Peterborough 10-2 Slough Jets Romford *8-3* Durham Wasps Peterborough 8-5 Sheffield Swindon 7-11 Basingstoke Milton Keynes Kings 10-4 Slough Jets P W D L F A P P W D L F A P Basingstoke 4 4 0 0 37 15 8 Sheffield Steelers 4 3 0 0 38 22 6 Durham Wasps 4 2 0 2 33 21 4 Peterborough 4 3 0 1 32 23 6 Swindon 4 1 0 3 21 43 2 Milton Keynes Kings 4 2 0 2 27 20 4 Romford Raiders 4 1 0 3 22 34 2 Slough Jets 4 0 0 4 9 41 0
rec.sport.hockey