Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ widget:
|
|
18 |
|
19 |
This model is based on the [facebook/wav2vec2-xls-r-300m model](https://huggingface.co/facebook/wav2vec2-xls-r-300m) and was fine-tuned with 72 hours of recordings and transcripts from the Croatian parliament. This training dataset is an early result of the second iteration of the [ParlaMint project](https://www.clarin.eu/content/parlamint-towards-comparable-parliamentary-corpora) inside which the dataset will be extended and published under the name ParlaSpeech-HR and an open licence.
|
20 |
|
21 |
-
The efforts resulting in this model were coordinated by Nikola Ljubešić, the rough manual data alignment was performed by Ivo-Pavao Jazbec, the method for fine automatic data alignment from [Plüss et al.](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02810) was applied by Vuk Batanović and Lenka Bajčetić, while the final modelling was performed by Peter Rupnik.
|
22 |
|
23 |
Initial evaluation on partially noisy data showed the model to achieve a word error rate of 13.68% and a character error rate of 4.56%.
|
24 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
19 |
This model is based on the [facebook/wav2vec2-xls-r-300m model](https://huggingface.co/facebook/wav2vec2-xls-r-300m) and was fine-tuned with 72 hours of recordings and transcripts from the Croatian parliament. This training dataset is an early result of the second iteration of the [ParlaMint project](https://www.clarin.eu/content/parlamint-towards-comparable-parliamentary-corpora) inside which the dataset will be extended and published under the name ParlaSpeech-HR and an open licence.
|
20 |
|
21 |
+
The efforts resulting in this model were coordinated by Nikola Ljubešić, the rough manual data alignment was performed by Ivo-Pavao Jazbec, the method for fine automatic data alignment from [Plüss et al.](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02810) was applied by Vuk Batanović and Lenka Bajčetić, the transcripts were normalised with a tool by Danijel Korzinek, while the final modelling was performed by Peter Rupnik.
|
22 |
|
23 |
Initial evaluation on partially noisy data showed the model to achieve a word error rate of 13.68% and a character error rate of 4.56%.
|
24 |
|